Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Elon Musk calls for US elected officials to undergo cognitive tests" video.

  1. Absolutely every single Republican tested would easily score well below 30 in any IQ test. It would be hilarious.
    5
  2. What about a cognitive test for Skynews presenters
    2
  3.  @chrisg8321  What has IQ got anything to do with debating. Maybe you need your IQ checked!
    1
  4.  @harryfarber6435  95% of the murderers that had their death sentences commuted were registered Republicans.
    1
  5. IQ has nothing to do with debating ability, but this was obvious from the responses to my initial post.
    1
  6. 99.999% of the death sentences commuted by Biden were registered Republicans.
    1
  7.  @harryfarber6435  He did. All the un alive sentences he commuted were registered Republicans.
    1
  8. @chrisg8321  What has being smart got anything to do with IQ. I said nothing about being smart, I specifically mentioned IQ.
    1
  9.  @chrisg8321  Happy for you to reference or quote any data that uses the word “smart” in describing the meaning of “IQ”.
    1
  10.  @chrisg8321  I do accept that in some dictionaries the word “smart” may have the word “intelligence” in its description. However intelligence and IQ are not the same thing. I was not referring to intelligence I explicitly mentioned “IQ”.
    1
  11. @chrisg8321  No. Factually incorrect, the word "intelligence" can be used to describe a whole host of things. I explicitly was referring to "IQ" which is a test. You may score quite high in "IQ" but lack the necessary skills required to be a successful debater. Conversely someone with just average "IQ" who commits to training for a debate will appear smarter (to use your language) than someone unprepared, no matter how high thier "IQ" is.
    1
  12.  @chrisg8321  Yes you are wrong. I used the term “IQ” which is a specific thing. You then separated the word intelligence out which created a different meaning and claimed being smart is the same as being intelligent, which I previously acknowledged is the case in some dictionaries. So all you have done so far is to resort to personal abuse (doesn’t concern me) and strawman my original comment by attempting to change the words I used. Again all you have contributed is fallacious nonsensical gibberish. Once again “IQ” is not the same or has the same meaning as intelligence.
    1
  13.  @chrisg8321  No you are wrong. In separating the word intelligence out of IQ you change the meaning of IQ. This is strawmaning and is fallacious nonsense.
    1
  14. @chrisg8321  Yes because you are wrong again in your reply. I didn't claim or suggest you Strawmaned saying "The I in IQ stands for intelligence". You Strawmaned by separating the word intelligence out of the term IQ and thus changing its meaning. Once again intelligence and IQ are not the same thing.
    1
  15. @chrisg8321  No, you explicitly spilt the term IQ and specifically concentrated on the word intelligence and thus attempted to change the meaning of term to suit your argument. That's strawmaning and it is fallacious garbage. Twice now you have resorted to personal abuse. Is that all you have? Try a logical argument instead.
    1