Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Aboriginals and Australians will be the ones that suffer if the Voice 'fails'" video.

@arroeducarlion4990 Read "An Aboriginal Australian Genome Reveals Seperate Human Dispersals into Asia Published in "Science" in Sep 2011.
2
@gregmatthies8128 Are you suggesting the British empire invented the wheel or the beginning of scientific thought/process, because if you are you are factually and demonstrably wrong.
1
@gregmatthies8128 The high rates of indigenous people in our gaol system is far more complicated than your simplistic ideas about offending. One example is access to quality legal advice, second if you create offences that mirror indigenous behaviours like public drunkenness then this disproportionately effects indigenous people. Imagine if it was an offence to be drunk at a dinner party in a private home. I would have spent my entire adult life in gaol. Our laws while not designed to be racist can and do effect certain groups disproportionately. The Royal commission into indigenous deaths in custody acknowledged this.
1
@arroeducarlion4990 The injection of South Asian DNA is a well established scientific fact. It happened about 5000 years ago and lined up with a spurt of food cooking technology in the northern parts of Australia. There is absolutely zero evidence of any group of humans inhabitanting the Australian mainland before the aboriginal.
1
@arroeducarlion4990 No you are factually and demonstrably wrong. There is only one race of humans. Yes we all have varying degrees of genealogy, with all sorts of some of bits of Neanderthal and Denisovans during our evolution. So what. Tasmanian aborigines were cut off due to the rising sea levels at the end of the last glacial period.
1
@arroeducarlion4990 Who is talking about genocide? I'm certainly not. If you are then put into context your discussion points and not ask a question that can be answered by a dictionary.
1
@arroeducarlion4990 I just explained it. Humans moved out of Africa some 300000 years ago and spread across the planet they intermingled with other homo species along the way. Easily explained.
1
@arroeducarlion4990 It absolutely has not been debunked. It is and remains the scientific consensus. Yes their are other theories, these have not been proven. There is overwhelming evidence of homosapiens evolving and then spreading out of Africa approximately 300000 years ago. If you have contrary opinion, please provide or cite the published peer reviewed scientific paper. Please don’t quote a YouTube channel or magazine article.
1
@arroeducarlion4990 Read; "The Hybrid Origin of Modern Humans" Evolutionary biology (October 2015)
1
@arroeducarlion4990 Cite one. If you are alluding to the different theories of humans out of Africa in one wave or several waves I certainly accept that possibility and there is much we are to learn. I still fail to see any end state to any point you are trying to make. Currently there is zero evidence of any human species inhabiting the Australian mainland prior to the aboriginal culture. If you are implying that the different groups came into conflict over untold numerous issues well no shit Sherlock, again what’s the point?
1
@gregmatthies8128 That’s exactly what I am doing and you have clarified your comment and I have no issues with it whatsoever. I’m a big fan of Western civilisation myself realising it is not perfect and has done some damage. It is actually you that is blindly arguing, I quote your words exactly “You see the only history I am interested started about 250 years ago in Australia.” Do not lecture me about keeping both eyes open, your hypocrisy slip is showing. I too don’t have any particular interest in indigenous culture but respect it. Again the hypocrisy in belittling indigenous dreaming stories when vast quantities of people and cultures from the West and the East believe in ridiculous sky daddy stories from ancient texts. Try and keep both your eye open.
1
@gregmatthies8128 You are factually incorrect public drunkenness is still a crime in Victoria.
1
@gregmatthies8128 The criminal data just doesn't support your statement. Indigenous people are overwhelming over representated on these public nuisance offences. It is a perfect example of laws not necessarily being racist but have unintended consequences directly disproportionately effecting Indigenous people. The data is clear.
1
@gregmatthies8128 You completely missed the point I was making so drawing pictures for you appears pointless. Your reply made this abundantly clear as you totally ignore the data.
1
@gregmatthies8128 No, ignoring potentially racist bias in our law making and the devastating effect it has on the disproportionate amount of indigenous Australians in our legal system and our gaols is what is truely racist.
1