Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Black ice covers roads in Blue Mountains after cold conditions" video.

@barryoconnor721 Nice ad hominem fallacy. Rendering your entire comment nonsensical gibberish.
1
@barryoconnor721 or in words you may understand a spelling mistake does not invalidate an argument.
1
Our Blue mountains here in Sydney are more a series of rolling hills.
1
@peterjones4180 If you are unable to recognise a light hearted flippant remark then I'm sad for you.
1
@peterjones4180 Your comments are just choke full of fallacious arguments, from Authority, to strawman, to Ad hominems, I don't think there isn't a form of fallacious argument you haven't tried.
1
Having seen the Andes, the Rockies, and the Himalayas I was merely taking the piss out of our own mountains here in Australia as we do, which at just over a 1000 metres are indeed technically mountains just not in the same class. Sorry you had to witness mister no humour and his rant.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. Another fallacious argument. Classic strawman. Anthropogenic climate change is significantly different to the cyclical climate change you are conflating it with. Read some scientific papers on the subject.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. Common public knowledge.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. No, you are continuing with your strawman. Anthropogenic climate change is unusual warming due to the burning of fossil fuels artificially rapidly increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. This is common public knowledge and not controversial.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. Geology.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. Core samples and the study of geology allows us to determine the makeup of the atmosphere million’s off years ago.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. Right I see your point now. What is natural and what is unnatural is irrelevant. Over the history of our planet there have been numerous different things that have effected our atmosphere from the sun to comets to the rotation of our earth. What anthropogenic climate change is the effect humans are having. We are causing it to heat rapidly. This is going to cause massive disruption and if we act to minimise it, then it may not be as bad.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. How do you know what is sensible and what isn't. I just explained your question is nonsensical.
1
@peterjones4180 Just a classic cherry picking fallacious argument. I'll stick with the science not your interpretation of it.
1
@peterjones4180 Read some scientific papers on the lag observed in atmospheric warming and CO2 concentrations in core samples from Antarctica. Your amateur analysis has been thoroughly debunked.
1
@TheRealBobSmith. specifically what abuse are you talking about? I may ridicule your argument but I have never been personally abusive, if you can provide an example I will apologise unreservedly.
1
@peterjones4180 Sorry that just is not what the science says you are misinterpreting the data.
1
@peterjones4180 You fundamentally don't understand that Antarctica ice core samples that contain CO2 samples are not indicative of the average or northern hemisphere CO2 samples. Just using Antarctica ice core samples as means of determining CO2 has been widely debunked. You are behind in the science.
1
@peterjones4180 Would you like me to reference the scientific papers that prove you are wrong. Ahh what the hell. Read, "Southern hemisphere climate response to ozone changes and greenhouse gas increase." Shindell and Schmidt 2004, Geophysical Research Letters, 2004. And persisting with an your argument from authority fallacy proves nothing.
1
@peterjones4180 seriously you get your information from youtube comments. I make no argument other than read the science. "The ice core record: climate sensitivity and future greenhouse warming" Lorius et al Nature 1990. "Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation" J.D. Shakun, Nature 2012. "Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes across Termination III" Caillion et al, Science 2003.
1
@peterjones4180 None of those papers invalidate the IPCC latest report which is explicit in its conclusion that human activity is warming the planet.
1
@peterjones4180 Yes you continue with this childish fallacious argument from authority rubbish. There is nothing highly contentious about the IPCC report as it has been reviewed by over 200 scientists. You have your own personal opinion and I have the IPCC report of which there isn't a singler one as they build on each other as we learn more. You are fixed on your personal view. You should write a paper and submit it. There is a Nobel prize in science awaiting you.
1
@peterjones4180 Straight out argument from authority and as such just nonsensical gibberish. Your personal circumstances are anecdotal and fallacious in argumentation as well.
1