Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "‘Heading back to the White House’: Donald Trump predicted to win the presidential election" video.

Here are 8 national independent polls showing Harris ahead. 1. Real clear politics poll 2. Race to the WH poll 3. decision desk. HQ/ the hill poll 4. 538 poll 5. Silver bulletin poll 6. Morning consult poll 7. CBS news/yougov poll 8. Civics/Daily cos poll
4
@furionmax7824 I don't expect MAGA fans to understand factual information.
2
@offgridgoldau They do if the candidate is ahead by enough points. On average Trump is only leading in four of the Battleground states. Trump may very well win, but my point was only that it is going to be very close.
2
Here are 8 national independent polls showing Harris ahead. 1. Real clear politics poll 2. Race to the WH poll 3. decision desk. HQ/ the hill poll 4. 538 poll 5. Silver bulletin poll 6. Morning consult poll 7. CBS news/yougov poll 8. Civics/Daily cos poll
2
@debnorris110 A ridiculously stupid reply. The polls I referenced included Rasmussen and other conservative polling organisations. You obviously know nothing about polling or bothered to do any research.
2
Here are 8 national independent polls showing Harris ahead. 1. Real clear politics poll 2. Race to the WH poll 3. decision desk. HQ/ the hill poll 4. 538 poll 5. Silver bulletin poll 6. Morning consult poll 7. CBS news/yougov poll 8. Civics/Daily cos poll
2
@kevint5890 Yes. I have made no predictions, simply provided factual polling data, most of which have Harris about 2 points ahead, which isn't enough to ensure an electoral collage victory. My point is only that it is very very close. Trump is polling slightly ahead in the battleground states. There may be only 10 or 20 electoral collage votes in it. Trump may win but only just.
2
@aaronaaron6569 I personally make no predictions,I simply provided factual polling data. Trump has a very slight lead in the battleground states. It will be very close, very very close.
1
@Positiveenergy68 I don't expect MAGA fans to understand factual information.
1
@furionmax7824 I made no comment about Trump, nor expressed any bias towards Harris, I merely posted factually correct polling information. It is a ridiculously stupid reply to suggest because I posted factually correct information I hate Trump. That is simply a ludicrously inane idea. Happy for you to actually reference any polling that supports Trump. I know I can and if you had of done just two minutes of research you would have discovered the polls I referenced included Rasmussen and other conservative polling organisations, but again I didn’t really expect to to understand polling data, and you proved me correct. Thankyou.
1
@Positiveenergy68 Some early polling does suggest that. I made no predictions about who would win, I merely posted factual polling data. I didn't really expect any MAGA fans to understand that, and I was correct, they didn't.
1
@kathymarson Just mindless partisan vacuous nonsense from you. If you had bothered to have a go at positiveenergy for his crack at low information Democrat voters your comment may have had some validity, but you didn't.
1
You have no idea about your own electoral system. You must register to vote and you must be over 18 and provide proof of your ID to register. You must be a US citizen to vote and provide evidence of this to register. You can put whatever you like in a drop box, but it won’t count unless you are a registered voter. I’m not even an American and I know this. Are you an American? Did you go to school in the US? If so that is a sad indicator of the US educational system.
1
@GrahamCahill-uj3sc Over 80 legal cases brought before the US courts at the last election were all thrown out for their idiocy. The US election system is one of the most robust in the entire world. It is by no means perfect, but you would have to provide evidence of widespread voter fraud, and nobody ever has.
1
@joe5923 Reference the specific incident where this has happened. Quote the case number and details.
1
@joe5923 Yes caught, arrested and eventually prosecuted. The system works perfectly.
1
@joe5923 idiot
1
@joe5923 You are a person of low intellectual capabilities.
1
Poor old joe5923 he obviously suffers from an low intellectual capacity and is unable to accept his own factual data.
1
@debnorris110 Nope simply stating factual data from publicly available and easily falsifiable data. Only you can’t falsify it, all you can do is use to tired old gaslighting term. You simply can’t handle the cognitive dissonance of data that conflicts with your preconceived bias.
1