Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "" video.

That just simply isn’t factually correct.
5
@stephenrichards5386 The idea you think a scientific paper is invalid because it’s 6 years old just proves your scientific illiteracy.
4
@stephenrichards5386 You didn’t even read it and both papers I referenced completely contradicted the original statement. You offer no rebuttal just unsubstantiated personal opinion that is worthless. Nature magazine is a scientific journal. It is neither perfect or claims to be but is peer reviewed and has retracted articles in the past. Your criticism is unfounded. Just because you don’t like the data is just your worthless personal opinion.
3
@stephenrichards5386 No certification, no data references, no citations, just your personal opinion which is literally worthless.
3
How many published peer reviewed scientific papers do you wish me to reference that proves beyond all reasonable doubt your claim is utterly false?
2
@corycarlson3846 “Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance 1979-2017” Eric Rignot, Jeremie Mouginot, Bernd Scheucl, National Library of Medicine
1
Mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet 1992-2017 IMBIE team Nature Magazine 2018
1
@stephenrichards5386 Yep, that's right a personal slur is always a good logical argument. Once again you provided no certification, no data references, no nothing. Just personal opinion which is just anecdotal and completely fallacious.
1
@jsshay01 Your argument is a anecdotal and fallacious. There are numerous scientific papers available on the internet that show beyond all reasonable doubt the rise in sea levels worldwide, and it isn’t uniform and why would it be as the oceans vary in all manner of things from salinity to temperature and of course the effects of gravity. Just because you don’t understand (another fallacious argument from incredulity) it doesn’t mean it isn’t reality. You made numerous claims all unsubstantiated, can you refer to a scientific study that shows ocean levels are stagnate?
1