Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Biden could be ‘impeached’ over mishandling of Afghanistan withdrawal" video.

Yep they were all on the same golf course with Trump
2
You make a very general statement about VP Harris and I understand your clear political bias, but could you please provide some actual fact based evidence for her incompetence. Thank you.
2
@masterken5369 No I understand that's your opinion, what I asked for was fact based argument of her incompetence, you have just offered meaningless white noise. Her net approval rating at -4 is low, but slightly higher than Pences was at the same stage, see I just provided more factual data in support of your opinion than you did. That does not prove incompetence though. Have another try.
1
@chinaprambassador5843 I made no claim about Joe Biden, and am wondering why exactly you commented on a request for evidence of VP Harris incompetence, with do your own research. You clearly lack any skills in argumentation and the burden of proof. You have publicly embarrassed yourself on this forum. Formulate a coherent reply and get back to me.
1
@masterken5369 I made no mention of President Biden, and yes you should be wary of someone hanging around so long with such a poor legislative record, but the American people voted for him anyway. I asked Judy specifically for evidence of VP Harris incompetence. You do understand the difference between just not liking someone's decision and actual incompetence, they are two completely seperate ideas. Never been a fan of coprophagia, however urolagnia that's a different matter.
1
@masterken5369 It's called taking the piss, and it's relatively easy with opinion based arguments.
1
edda green As colourful and descriptive your advice is, how in way does this relate to my request for actual fact based evidence of VP Harris incompetence. I have only recently been to my doctor and I can confirm my head is truthfully where it is meant to be and have a solid work history enabling a comfortable lifestyle while always paying my tax. Now these inconsequential matters are out of the way. Can you please answer my question?
1
@masterken5369 One long nonsensical meaningless rant to a simple question to provide evidence to a claim of incompetence which you completely avoided and were unable to provide. When you make the claim you have the burden of proof. Have another go try and be coherent this time.
1
@chinaprambassador5843 I asked for a coherent response and all you sent was gobblygook mashup of total rubbish. Do you have anything sensible to say?
1
@masterken5369 google or search for what. I will accept VP Harris is incompetent if you can just provide the thinnest sliver of evidence, anything what about her cooking skills have you evidence that a cake she baked tasted bad because she mixed up the sugar with salt, this would prove she is incompetent, otherwise just give it away as it is your unjustified belief she is incompetent and I'll accept that.
1
@kristinajackson5862 Nice try, but what you have just committed is what in argumentation is called shifting the burden and is a logical fallacy. I made no claim about VP Harris or her competence
1
@kristinajackson5862 You obviously didn't understand my reply. I answered your question in detail, but let me make it clear for you. Your question is nonsensical in context. I made no such claim, I asked Judy Grantham to provide evidence of her claim. Your question to me is as irrelevant or nonsensical as me asking you to provide evidence you have a drivers license, it's meaningless. Your just embarrassing yourself in a public forum.
1
edda green Sorry I didn't realise you were a millennial and had the attention span of a goldfish.
1
@masterken5369 My opinion of her performance in the VP debate is hardly proof, but here it is anyway seeing as you asked. First off I was quite impressed with VP Pence, I thought Harris was reasonable but her mannerisms were a little off putting, I think she rolled her eyes once too often. Overall Pence was a little better but Harris was still good. As I said though this doesn't prove incompetence, to you it might prove you didn't like her policies and that's fine, just because two sides presented doesn't mean one is incompetent and one right. Rarely in life things are black or white.
1
@kristinajackson5862 You just pileing on the fallacies one after the other. Just suppose I am lonely in no way shape or form does that influence the point or question I asked or made. This is called a Ad hominem argument and is a logical fallacy. So far in your replys to me you haven't made one logical point, just meaningless chatter. This is public forum and you should expect to be questioned if you make an unsupported comment. If you don't then don't comment publicly. I'm sorry you feel that replying to a public comment on a public platform is a sign of loneliness for you. There are helplines and support available for you.
1
@masterken5369 The structure social norms and ethnicity of your family are irrelevant to the discussion about VP Harris competency, but your inability to stay on topic does in a small way demostate your competency in structuring a coherent argument.
1
@kristinajackson5862 You simply failed to understand a single word I said. That's not pathetic just sad you showed such ignorance publicly. Kamala Harris is qualified to be VIce President because the American people elected her. This is not a hard concept to understand. You did not ask genuine question, a genuine question would have been directed to Judy Grantham who made the original claim of incompetence.
1
@chinaprambassador5843 "Rhetoric is the art of ruling the minds of men"
1
@masterken5369 So that's it, repeated requests from me for some actual evidence of VP Harris incompetence have finally been met by attempted ridicule that only shows you to be a bigot, and I'm the loser?
1
@kristinajackson5862 Kamala Harris is a lawyer by trade as was a successful prosecutor. She was twice elected, DA and then Attorney General of California. She was then elected to the US senate, and ended up being elected VP. Now you may not like her political views but these actions all provide evidence of her competence as a lawyer and politician.
1
@masterken5369 Just more personal abuse and the sum of your evidence is a quote from an estranged father who had little contact with his daughter since she was seven, and you call me idiotic, you moronic clown
1
@masterken5369 None of that was evidence of incompetence only your opinion. You obviously do like her political decisions and that's fine you are completely entitled to them. Do you hold Trump and Republicans to the same standard about the things they said about each other during primary debates. Do you remember what Lindsey Graham said about Trump before he was elected. That of course doesn't let Harris off the hook, there are Democratic policies I don't agree with either some of them you mentioned, but it is not a measure of competence. Finally you go off on this parochial rant that your view is the only right one and I'm a communist, which is just a nonsensical black and white arguement and is a logical fallacy in argumentation. It childish, it just like saying I'm good and your bad. You just are unable to comprehend that you can have opposing political views it doesn't necessarily mean one is absolutely wrong and the other completely right. Are you that truely mired in your opinion you are unable to see just the slightest difference, because if not that is sad.
1
@masterken5369 As the US has the highest incarceration rate in the world at 698 per 100000 that is not much to be particularly proud of.
1
@WinstonNewYork You do understand it was the Republicans under President Trump who signed the withdrawal agreement with the Taliban. You have just accused the Republican Party of being communists, do you know how silly that sounds.
1
@adamk6299 What you just said is just nonsensical white noise other than he signed a whole heap of executive orders that if you had a memory longer than two minutes would realise Trump did as soon he was President as did Obama and you can just keep going back, your point is pointless, this is just common practice, you may not agree with those actions but others do. I made one specific factual point, not senseless opinions.
1
@WinstonNewYork I made one factual point and made no expression of my lack of or support of President Biden only that President Trump signed the deal for the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and you have gone off on some ridiculous parochial political rant about issues I never mentioned. This idea that the US is in danger of becoming a fascist state has been thrown around by both sides and is just a reflection of how stupid and parochial the political debate is in the US.
1
@patricksweeney5132 Have you read the four page withdrawal document, published on the State Department website? Quote for me please the references to punishment clauses? I can't find them. Your claim of Biden varying from Trumps agreement is false all Biden did to alter the process was delay the date by 4 months.
1
@WinstonNewYork That was the most cowardly gutless reply I have ever received from anyone on YouTube ever. I often get personally abused because I insist on facts to support an argument and when backed into corner that is all quite often they have, and I ignore it and move on, but in your case I will respond to your pathetic gutless cowardly reply in accusing me of sophistry by making a legitimate factual point that you with your limited experience and obvious lack of knowledge of the issue are unable to answer, and then you finish with a good day, you contemptible hypocrite.
1
@WinstonNewYork I was polite in my previous response but once you accused me of being deceitful the gloves are off. You might have thought you were accusing the democrats of giving up on the war. You are so ignorant you didn't even know that it was Trump and the Republicans who decided to end the war in Afghanistan and withdraw, you moron.
1
@WinstonNewYork Here is another one for you genius. Why did the Democrats only rigg the Presidential election? Why didn't they rigg the House of Representatives? Democrats actually lost seats. Why didn't they rigg the Senate elections so they had an absolute majority and not have to deal with the filibuster. You clown, you and your stupid conspiracy theory. I have more integrity in my small toe than you have in your entire body.
1
@WinstonNewYork So that's it your entire reason is an argument from ignorance, you can't imagine how they did it you just know they did it. You can't accept Trump lost in a free and fair election which is how the Justice Department described it. They called it the most free and fair election in US history. An argument from ignorance is just an informal fallacy. You do realise Trump lawyers have argued in court that no reasonable person would believe that the voter machines were made or manipulated by Venezuela. These were Sidney Powells own words. Every one of those claims that came before a court was thrown out, some by Judges Trump had appointed.
1
@kurtfrancis4621 And in your comment you sum up perfectly the hopeless stupidity of parochial American politics at the moment.
1
Your comment is a sad reflection of the state of American political discourse and how stupidly parochial it has become.
1