Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Tucker: What is the science behind this?" video.

it’s called climate proxy, and just because you don’t understand it (which is an argument from ignorance and a logical fallacy) doesn’t mean it is a not real. Read up on climate science and educate yourself. Your comment is just embarrassing.
2
@defeqel6537 science has never claimed to be infallible, but I’m interested, what is?
2
@sagacious00004 What part of modern science is built on shaky foundations?
2
@defeqel6537 Fine. Name me a particular climate model that was significantly wrong.
1
@Bydun4prison Nope just calling out BS where I see it, not attempting to invoke fringe metaphors.
1
@zephyrwinkle6552 There is no singular current climate model and the fact you suggest there is shows how little you know about the subject. If you mean the CMIP5 models used by the IPCC then it consists of approximately 100 different climate models produced by 49 different groups. If you are claiming these are all wrong then you are going to have to provide some substantive evidence, otherwise you are just talking out of your arse.
1
@defeqel6537 Hansens models were virtually spot on. The 1988 to 2017 temperature increase of 0.6c proved his model correct. The myth about Hansen models being wrong come s from deliberately false evidence given by Patrick Michaels ( who is mostly under the pay of the fossil fuel industry). He deliberately left out Hansens scenarios B and C. Micheals simply deleted inconvenient data. In fact global surface temperatures have increased by about 0.35 since 2000 precisely in line with Hansens 1988 model. I could go on, but you are just factually and demonstrably wrong. You have been sold on Fossil fuel PR spin. Nothing to be ashamed of it has happened to millions of people.
1
@C GN Nice try but it is yourself using the hyperbolic language. I have merely quoted the accepted science which mentions nothing about the end of the world. I leave that up to RWNJs.
1