Comments by "Winnetou17" (@Winnetou17) on "DistroTube"
channel.
-
159
-
62
-
27
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
Stallman also doesn't use it for the priciple of it. I've never understood, and it pains me, the people that saw Stallman using really old hardware having basically a severely handicapped experience and then they thought to themselves "hmm, nope, I don't want to do that, no FOSS for me". Like, nobody is asking you to go to the same lengths as Stallman, he's just showcasing you just how bad of a situation we're in. If anythink, it should be more of a reason to start contributing to FOSS one way or another, so if people get in a situation where they HAVE to go full FOSS, they won't be so behind in features.
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Until snaps can have custom repositories, people complaining about it will never stop, even if Canonical will be spotless for, say, 10 years. And while I don't actively complain, I support the camp that complains about it.
Really, having the backend closed source is simply a risk. A risk that at one point it will be gone. Or it will turn for the worse. It might not happen, but noone can guarantee it won't. There are many people who will happily use it, and if it goes to the doodoo simply switch to another package format. But some other people prefer stability. That is, they prefer to settle on the better (preferably best) format and then never have to deal with it again.
Canonical really is wrong with this approach. For snaps' sake, I hope that they either make the backend open source too, or someone creates a custom backend for a snap repository so people can bypass Canonical's nonsense.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
I disagree with the ranking. Yeah, if you know already what to expect, what do you have to do, it is easy.
But, in some cases, let's take Gentoo, you do have to learn quite some things for it to work. And as nice as the wiki is, there's still things that you kind of need to know before hand, otherwise you'll be in for a bad time. Like someone mentioned, when it breaks... well, it's not so easy anymore, now, is it ? And just the amount of what you need to learn, what packages do what, what an OS requires in general and so on, there's a lot to learn. That's objectively difficult.
Of course, there is such a thing as something being difficult no matter how much you know. I'd say that it doesn't apply here almost at all. Everything related to installing and maintaing an OS is knowledge based. There's no realtime dexterity or attention/observation/perception contest where if you do not act in less than 1 second to an event you lose.
Back to the Gentoo example. I can bet you that more than 99% of people who a) didn't used Linux before or know that much about it and b) are not developers, now these people, if you would task them to install Gentoo (as their first Linux install) I bet you that more than 99% won't be able to do it in less than 24 hours. On a computer where compiling everything needed takes less than 4 hours. They'll have A LOT to learn. Well, maybe some may be able to do it faster, if they skip on the documentation, and happen that the code examples all work.
If you take out the "time to learn" parameter from the equation, most things in life become easy.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I don't think that Notepad++ devs are hypocritical in the slightest. Few things to consider:
- are they owned by Microsoft ? No
- do they have contracts with Microsoft ? Pretty certain they don't
- Notepad++ is 17 years old software that's very praised for it's usefulness on Windows. If Microsoft does NOW something bad, what would the devs that worked 17 years on this project supposed to do ? Close the project now ? Ok, it can be argued that this isn't the first shady thing that Microsoft does, but you get the idea
So, considering the above, I think that the devs publicly distancing themselves to what Microsoft did is exactly the thing they should've done. Though I can also argue about not mixing products with ideology. I mean, raise your individual fork at Microsoft, but leave the Notepad++ project completely untouched. But getting back, I don't think they're hypocritical. You can certainly stay in a man's backyard but still fight them over things you don't approve. You don't have to immediately leave. If the differences are many, clear and insurmountable, THEN you'll have to eventually leave.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3