Comments by "Winnetou17" (@Winnetou17) on "The Lunduke Journal"
channel.
-
23
-
16
-
15
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's been like that for many years already. It focuses and comments more on the future and the trends, not that much on particular stuff that's currently not working. It did that in the first editions, but it got boring and repetitive (for him) fast (every single year to mention how bad games are on Linux, for example), so he shifted on more of a meta analysis.
While I wouldn't say no to have an actual list, roundup of all the things still missing or being broken in Linux, I appreciate this culture and trend analysis more, since it's less easy to observe and realize the current state or the near to medium term risks.
He is usually a bit more pessimistic in his views, but, in a way, he's contributing to those things not having a change to turn into reality, by outraging people who in turn do something about it, before it's too late.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I agree on your first part, but fully disagree with the last paragraph about "if you're a tech reporter, report on the tech". I mean, you can certainly skip the un-interesting to you stuff, just like I skip political stories some times and sport stories almost all the time. But if something is in the tech, or affects the tech, how, why shouldn't that be reported ?
You mean that, say, hypothetically a news item like "Company X in tech is shutting down half of its servers in preparation of the incoming hurricane and floods that will hit tomorrow" should NOT be reported because some people "don't want a weather report" ?? Should the fact that the organization that funds and steers the Linux development decides to spend less and less on that and increasingly more on totally unrelated stuff NOT be reported ? Something like this, where, if people know about it in time, can rally up and push against some stupid political change, so they can save the project NOT be covered, because it's a news item that's political in nature ? I'm just baffled beyond words of how can you say that. It's beyond obvious to me that this SHOULD.... no, sorry, this MUST be reported on. You can simply filter them out if you're not interested. But the reporting of something that affects tech, by tech journalists absolutely must be done. That's journalism 101. Jeez Louise!
2
-
2
-
Sorry to put this out to you, but many artist are and were as$h0les Or at least very very difficult to work with, and hard to be a close person to. Aka, very focused on their project and their passion, neglecting everything else. If you want to check all the people of all the bands, movies, paintings, sculptures etcetc in detail, you''ll be put off by 80% of them. I'd say to separate the two, the artist and the art, and only make sure that you don't promote ahole artists in a way that enables them to be more ahole-y. At least on the dead ones that's very easy.
With Linux Mint, maan, that's so disappoint to hear. I hope the community can steer it off of that though.
2
-
2
-
@dm8579 1) Yes, it CAN help. If both USA and EU have been acting faster on the helping side (some of which they themselves set the deadline), maybe Ukraine would've recovered the territory by now
2) Ukraine didn't ask just for money, it requested other things too, like the ability to use rockets in Russia
3) Don't act as if US has absolutely nothing to gain. A weakened Russia means more gas exports (which it already increase) for USA, and a lot of weapons selling to all ex-soviet countries that want to get rid of Russia, like the baltic states, Ukraine, Georgia, not to mention the increase of military spending for most of NATO, which a good portion comes back to USA as weapons sold
4) In the end it's still up to USA how it uses its own money, you can't fault Zelensky for asking
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@alomac8976 That slow startup times, last time I watched a video about it, was largely been addressed. Also, if waiting literally 2 extra seconds when you open a program is that much of a concern.... then I feel sorry. The running performance was already on par with flatpaks, IIRC.
The other side that xritics briefly mentioned, is that you can have anything as a snap, including daemons, system tools and I think, even libraries. That is, some things you can have them as snaps, but not flatpaks. From what I remember, a good example of that is Nextcloud, the cloud server software - which can be installed trivially as a snap.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I almost hate Microsoft with a passion, but I couldn't simply spew such gigantic BS that Win 11 uses almost 8 GB of RAM idling. Maaaybe if you have 128 GB of RAM and if you also have a lot of extra bloatware, then maaaaybe you can reach that.
But a clean Win 11, even with 128 GB (it matters how much total you have, as Windows will try to prefetch and cache things if you have extra/spare RAM, which is GOOD) I don't think it reaches that much.
My Win 10 was at about 3.6 GB of RAM un startup, and I have 64 GB of RAM in total. And I don't have a clean installation, this Win 10 was never reinstalled, it's still the same (but upgraded to Pro at one point) that came with the laptop, almost 8 (yes, eight) years ago.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This coming from something that fElon touched, I have no confidence that it's actually real, even remotely so. Plus, 103 days can be like 102 days of waiting for approvals and 1 full day of meetings + actual work. The idea being that while it will take 103 days for that change to be public, the engineer can spend his time on other tasks on those 102 days of approval waiting.
Still, it's extremely likely that there was a lot of red tape, I just wouldn't take for granted that it was that bad. Frankly, even one full day is extremely bad, and I think that's the level it actually was before. This is one area where Elon does do well, getting rid of needless beaurocracy (well, sometimes it is needed, he cuts that too) and lazy people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm part of this statistic change 😀
Long overdue, this start of the year (well, started just before the year change) I finally installed my first Linux on bare metal and switched to it. I went directly with Gentoo. In these 8 months, I only logged in back into Windows 10 (which still functioned flawlessly, I might add, one of the reasons I switched so late) a total of 3 times, one of which was only to check that it's still working and to do updates, just in case.
I'm not surprised that Gentoo isn't in the statistics, it's very niche by its nature, and while I love it and I think it's, by a good margin, the distro with the best customizations possible (in an easy to do manner), I think it will always be niche.
I also have to point out (fortunately at least one other comment saw it) the Steam Desktop share is flawed and it is trivially to see it. SteamOS users are Steam Deck users, which, last time I checked, it is not a desktop PC neither a laptop. Even if you keep it on a desktop or in your lap. So the Steam Desktop PCs users is actually about 1%. Which, I do have to admit, is significantly lower than I expected. Steam somehow saw the least Linux increase, even though it should've actually increased the most, since it has two vectors: desktop PCs AND Steam Deck. But then again, the surveys are only on a portion and it's random, so there's always a chance of stats being skewed by how the random picks happened. That's why it's better to wait several months too see a trend, like Bryan said in the video.
1