Comments by "Winnetou17" (@Winnetou17) on "JayzTwoCents" channel.

  1. But it launched 5 (five) (two less than 7) years ago...
    19
  2. Enjoy the 130% improvement :)
    18
  3. LoL, that WOULD be funny!
    11
  4.  @AutomotiveConcepts  Hey, this is a nerd gathering, get your toned muscular a$s outta here!
    8
  5. But but, a no case IS the best case XD
    5
  6. Just limiting the power will most likely do jack S#!T, since the main problem is the high voltage. Which is present when a single core boost happens. Which, guess what, is when the processor runs at 30-50W. When at 200-300W, the voltage is actually lower, just like the frequencies are lower at all-core workloads vs single core workloads which can boost to 6.0 GHz.
    3
  7. So, did Jay try to change the power supply too, or only everything else ?
    2
  8. In 98% of games now, no. And in, say, 2 years, that might drop to 90% of games. Also, if you like to play at 4K, that can jump back to 100% :)) I'd say that if you can afford that card or similar, get it. Worry about upgrading CPU later.
    2
  9. About that IGP removed from KabyLake-X, that's a thing that was requested by consumers (don't know how much though). In the idea that instead of space & thermals used needlessly by the IGP, intel would better just make the CPU better and let the graphics for the actual GPU. I for one I am glad to see that, though the specs I find show 7740X having just 100MHz more base clock and the same 4.5GHz boost clock. Lame. For everything else... yeah, WTF intel. This shows to me that they have NO confidence in their own products. I see no other reason to rush things this much and come up with this extremely lame release. They really are afraid that if they waited 2-3 more months to come with an actual coherent line-up they would somehow lose too much market or something. But I think this poor launch actually helped AMD more than if intel hadn't had said or released anything at Computex. Also, I'm not (...yet..) anti-intel, I'm not on the bandwagon that they are just ripping and milking consumers etcetc, because I don't know for certain if that is true or those money are actually well spent. Anyway, on this x299 launch, they announced that they would allow bootable RAID 1 and RAID 10 for NVMe by buying a 99$ physical key (or something like that). Sooo, physical keys ? In 2017 ? That's so anti-consumer I can't even.... Fuck intel for this thing alone. I hope their value halves and those that are in charge now get fired and end up in poverty.
    1
  10. Nope, your comment is epic fail. Ryzen R7 are in a totally different category than 7700k.
    1
  11.  @Many_Mirrors  All 4 are with the same motherboard and power supply ?
    1
  12. Seeing Jay saying that all the 4 unmatched sticks have tighter timings that the 3200-16-16-whatever stick shows that, unfortunately, Jay doesn't understand those RAM timings. All those timers are based on CLOCK CYCLES. A 2400 "MHz" (actually 1200 MHz and 2400 MT/s) stick, like the Patriot one, at CL of 15 is THE SAME as another stick at 4800 "MHz" with a CL of 30. And they both mean 12.5 ns CAS Latency. A CL 19 5100 "MHz" stick is NOT looser on timings than a CL 16 3200 "MHz" stick. It's actually much faster (lower latencies), while also having much more bandwidth (more transfers per second). 5100 "MHz" with CL 19 means 7.45 ns of latency on CAS. While 3200 "MHz" with CL 16 means 10 ns of latency for CAS. The 5100 "MHz" stick is on another league, as it's much much faster than the... all the others in this video. And 7-8 ns of latency is about as good as you can get, while 10 ns is average to good (on desktop)
    1
  13. If we keep the progression, it would be 0x12d, as it was a difference of 4 between 0x125 and 0x129. And 0x131 would be 8 versions away, not 13... ?
    1