Youtube comments of Winnetou17 (@Winnetou17).

  1. "If you hate our signing you can tell us to replace it, or just use alcohol to remove it" - Now THAT'S dedication for customer satisfaction! Thank you GN!
    559
  2. I don't agree with the main premise of the video. It's not AI that's killing Adobe, it's their excessive greed. Au contraire, I think their AI integrations are doing fine. Though I still wish them bancrupcy for their greediness. Also what's said at 0:35 "the wealthiest and most influential software company in the world" couldn't be more wrong. I smell AI slop
    221
  3. On the Google doesn't support JPEG-XL because CPU costs... that's a cop-out. They've been asked multiple times, including by companies like Adobe, to implement it and they just straight up refused also acting like nobody cares about JPEG-XL. You can say whatever you want, but if you read the chromium thread about it, it's clear as day that Google DECIDED against both JPEG-XL and the community with no technical reasoning. Of course, they didn't say out loud why. Also, the CPU costs of JPEG-XL cannot be the only reason of rejecting it. There's loads of other use cases. Not to mention the forward looking of, JPEG XL is alone in the amount of features it provides/support that is outside of just some 300x300 images on a random website. You can have wide color gamut and HDR in it. People taking high-detail high resolution photos, can put the original images directly as jpegxl. But Google directly jumped in to say "nope, cannot see that directly in the browser. Think of the children in Africa!". I'll stop, my blood is starting to boil. I see that close to the end of the video these extra features were mentioned, so at least I'm at peace that Theo saw that. - I'm totally on the webp that it is good and it should still be supported as the bridge to JPEG XL. - AVIF has nice features, but it's a dead-end technology, we shouldn't bother putting more effort into it. - JPEG XL is truly the next generation of image formats and what we will use for decades. Hence why it's so infuriating of Google actively being against it and slowing massively its adoption. No, I'm not buying out the CPU cost argument. That's not the browser support problem. In a world where a website has a 6.6 MB JPEG with .png extension image, there's PLENTY of room for JPEG XL. Lastly, I really want to see benchmarks of just how slow JPEG XL supposedly is. I found out a benchmark, apparently from 2020 which unfortunately doesn't have a comparison to webp. And just citing X or Y MB/s is meaningless when you don't webp on the same exact hardware, as the numbers can differ massively from one CPU to another. Not to mention that 4 years have passed, things might've changed. EDIT: Initially mentioned about JPEGXL being lossless, but Theo corrected that very quickly. Also mentioned about PNG: PNG not being compressed ? Duuuude .... It's not a good compression for photographs (hence why people still use JPEG for that, it looks basically the same to a human, if you don't need to zoom in, and it is a smaller size as a JPEG). But PNG itself totally has compression. And multiple ways in which you can reduce the file size. There's a reason TinyPNG exists (or existed, didn't check recently)
    208
  4. And even though they're REALLY expensive (and only financially worth in very densely populated areas), they're still much cheaper than hyperloop.
    179
  5. A classic case of "If you really want to poison yourself so much, as least do it with the good stuff". That is, if you want/need Windows and other MS programs so much, just use Windows and be done for. No need to jump through extra hoops, while also compromising on ... literally everything.
    159
  6. Well, none. Except that when using cars you can be more exclusive, as in you can travel by yourself or just with your friends. More like a premium option. But it's more expensive and more wasteful.
    154
  7. Nothing. People are stupid. A subway train is better than this, and it's already a century old technology.
    141
  8. I lost it at "Ask me how I know these things". Oh, so true :))
    136
  9. Here, get yourself a better computer, so you can run Arch with a tiling window manager!
    130
  10.  @TheWizardGamez  It's not the cameras, it's the Starweak signal.
    128
  11. Since Brodie didn't say it, the "bus factor" is a situation where you have too much reliance on one person and if, theoretically, that person gets hit by a bus, then you suddenly have a very big problem. In other words, the knowledge (and sometimes work) is not spread or shared among more people. This is separate from having documentation, as even with perfect documentation, that someone new taking the role will still have to go through the documentation, so there will still be down time (and in reality you never have perfect documentation)
    108
  12. One thing to mention: on things that should be on release, you can still have a little effect on press. Buttons are like that, to have 4 states: normal, hover, active (aka on pressed, no released) and disabled .... if I remember correctly. Having something like a color change on press would still maintain the feeling of very fast interaction.
    106
  13. If I'm not mistaken, it was John Carmack that added that fast inverse square root in Quake 3, but what's important this time is that he didn't invented it. I mean, it's important because some people attributed that to him, and while he's a genious, it wasn't in this case. Still, way above the average coder for knowing or finding about this.
    105
  14. At 1:08 the editor did not get the joke. There's 2 hard problems: naming things, OFF BY ONE ERRORS and live sync (cache invalidation in the version I knew)
    104
  15. Holy crap, that "you need to enable macros" popup window only had Ok as an option ? Shouldn't that be a "Yes" and "No" prompt ? Also, knowing macros, can't see you see the macros before you decide to run them ? Lastly, shouldn't there be a mode in which you can only have current-document-modifications macros, which are totally incapable of seeing/accessing what you have on your computer, spawning other processes etc ? How is Microsoft not being sued after having that dumpster fire that are Macros in MS Office being so notoriously insecure for sooo long ?
    91
  16. I think that Apple gets less hate because they're a more "opt-in" ecosystem / playground. That is, the default is windows, when you have no choice or don't know what to pick. So you'll use it and, in many cases, find things that irk you and some that you'll absolutely hate. But going to an Apple... you usually reasearch it a bit, before you choose to buy one. That is, you already have some idea if you'd like it or not and there's good chances that you'll simply not switch to it if there's possibility of incompatibility, so to speak. Getting back to Windows being the default option - you rarely are forced to use Apple, for, say, work. So bottom line of the above, when going Apple you usually know what you're getting into, significantly reducing the number of people frustrating with using it. As some simply choose to not go Apple, they might've realized beforehand that what they're doing is simply incompatible (like most gaming). And the rest might've had done some research and learned how to do the basic things. Me personally, I do hate Apple more than Microsoft. I do not deny that their engineers and designers are usually doing a very good job. Most people I know using Apple's products are happy, things work. Well, the thing they're using it for. But Apple is so focused on control and walling the garden as much as possible, so anti consumer, that I do not care how good their products are. Microsoft, to be fair, is not that far off. But, I guess, because their current position, they have a much bigger garden, so closing it is much much harder. But their strides for requiring an online Microsoft account, and what they're doing to secure login and I forgot the next thing after secure login, that's also a no-no. I've used Windows since Windows 95 (used a bit 3.11 too, but it was on old computers in some places) to Windows 10, and I've been a happy Windows 10 user. I know I won't drive Windows 11, not by personal choice. I might have to, for work, but unless I REALLY have to for something specific, I won't install it on any of my personal systems. Even if their bullshit if bypassable.
    79
  17. It's ok, we'll just spend 90% of our time watching programming videos on YouTube, and no one will know then :D
    76
  18. Trolleytrucks
    70
  19. I stand with Drew here. He might've been nagging and snarky a bit, but was in the right. And the later responses from Go's side were quite lacking, I'd say much more impolite that Drew ever was in those threads. First, like Brodie said, they initially said they can do a temporary solution, and that they're working on a solution or at least some improvements. Later, with no further notice, they act like the temporary solution is the well-established-and-acknowledged one, with no more information on the improvement/solution. Second, the responses like "because of boring details, we don't want to do this" (paraphrase). But it's exactly the place and time to actually post those admitedly boring details since at least those who are impacted can understand why it takes so long or why it's not practical to be done, and the people that are in those threads can understand a lot on the subject. Not to mention that it would've also shed some light into the prioritisation, if it's something that is hard to do, it can be understood that there are more important things to do first. But no, they treated those impacted like kids who want too much, and whose pains are not important. Sigh Edit: I forgot to add. When you have 3 requests from the same IP in the same second... I find it hard to believe that something can't be done about it, with reasonable effort. Example: 5:18
    67
  20. I have this vaaaague feeling that the person responsable for that gets much more than the minimum wag e
    64
  21. Regarding Samsung's crysis (1 ? 2 ? Remastered ?) mode, I really appreciate that it is for EXECUTIVES. That's actually so rare to see. If a problem arrives and, like, more work needs to be done, it's usually the regular employees that take the grunt. Here it seems like they are actually taking this seriously. Even though I don't like Samsung anymore, I respect this part of their work ethic.
    64
  22. I cannot but nickpick that you say that Stallman is asking things from users. Check 18:10 and especially what he says at 18:40 . He is not asking users do to stuff, he's just doing things for himself the way he sees it they should be done, and encourage others to do the same. Of course, as you say, it's very impractical now for most of the people to live with the same restrictions as Stallman. Hell, I'm posting this from a Windows laptop, because I'm that confortable. However, the more people are aware of this, and see the valor of free software, the more people will get involved in it, and the more it will get to be a reality. No company or current government will do that. Simple people will have to work hard and unite in order to achieve this. So for now we have an OS and several tools which are free. Then some people make another tool or program free. Then some talented people, fed up by Intel's surveillance in their CPUs team up and make a free CPU. And so on. So, don't think too much of the good things that you'll have to give up in order to be pure. Think of the things you can help out (even by just spreading the idea and debate on this topic around) so you and everyone else will have less and less things to give up, in order to live a free life :)
    62
  23.  @peterhutt4807  Why sad ? I actually like that I don't have the surprise spoiled.
    62
  24. That's what's nice in RAR, it has a flag for that. If you want to compress a huge library of pictures or videos for example, you might want to have them independently compressed. But a large database or text-like files or things like a complete game / program you might want to compress the whole archive.
    55
  25. I really hate this nowadays trend/push of "you cannot discern for yourself, WE have to do it for you, so we're censoring things. Don't worry, it's for your beeeenefit. Think of the children!"
    54
  26.  @censoredterminalautism4073  () { } aaah, so much cleaner... I can actually see lines of code now, not half of the screen filled with empty lines
    54
  27. Interesting. I assume that the division got sorted in the newer CPU instructions, but what about the sqrt ? How is that handled faster ? I don't know, but I don't think there's a CPU instruction to compute the sqrt...
    51
  28. Of course it wasn't here, because it's true hue hue hue
    51
  29. They did already. It's hard to see, because it's been many iterations. A 6700K is much much worse than a flagship 10th or 11th gen CPU, especially with the Spectre+Meltdown mitigations in place. And I'm pretty sure that a 11900K with only 4 cores enabled + hyperthread will be significantly faster than a 6700K, while consuming less power. Or the same power consumed, but much higher clock speeds. I said a 11900K instead of a 11100 because the 6700K was the flagship, so it had the best binning, so it would be fair to compare it to the best binned of this generation.
    50
  30. Some of us have YT Premium, so hopefully he gets enough money to be worth it :)
    45
  31. Not to mention that the handle can look legit in multiple ways. That is, you cannot know if it is the correct one unless ... you know it beforehand. For example, @donaldtrump can be as legit as @donaldjtrump (the j from his middle name). Same with Elon Musk, maybe the real one is @elonreevemusk (his full name). How can you know by just seeing them ?
    45
  32. This works because you're 3 people. Grow to 8 and it will most likely fall apart unless everybody has the same knowledge/seniority and way of doing things (which is rare).
    42
  33. DT: "A lot of these programs are now becoming so big and complicated" My mind: strong and complicated password *tap tap*
    40
  34. I am amazed that it wasn't featured at all, not even in the honourable mentions.
    38
  35. It wasn't Qualcomm which lit up the efficiency fire under Intel's bu^^. Because you can't answer to something like that in a couple of months. It was Apple, 4 years ago when they launched M1 which lit up the efficiency fire. That's how long architecting, designing and manufacturing a chip takes. And it can take even more than 4 years. I'm baffled about this "launch". Apparently actual reviews come only on 24th of September ? This seems to have been only a pre-launch hands on. Now wainting for another 3 weeks will be a bit painful. But I am excited about Lunar Lake, I really hope Intel didn't screw this one. I was mostly alone in battling people which were touting "hurr ArM iS sO mUcH mOrE eFfIcIeNt tHaN x86. durrr die x86" and I tried to explain that Apple's M efficiency comes from more sources, not ARM alone. Two of the major ones was memory directly on chip and better manufacturing node. Now Intel did both with Lunar Lake. Once the drivers for Linux are matured, we'll be able to see a proper ARM vs x86 comparison that's more apples to apples (pun unintended).
    38
  36. I have some questions for AMD, though surely we'll never have an answer as their recent silence is already one answer for many of them. Anyway, here it goes: - Why was B550 so late ? - Why was this support/compatibility annouced so late ? Wasn't it known when Zen 2 launched ? If not, when was it known ? Even so, wasn't a lack of guarantee known in advance ? Couldn't AMD give some warnings going forward ? - When making the decision to absolutely not support any 3xx or 4xx chipsets for Zen 3 CPUs, were any board partners consulted ? - Wasn't AMD aware that many customers are buying B450 specifically to upgrade to a Zen 3 CPU ? Why wasn't there any communication ? - Why is AMD still so silent about the matter ? How could a customer not think that AMD simply pulled an Intel out of greed and/or lack of care ? That is, simply abandon a part of customers and move forward, because it's easier. How can an AMD fan have the benefit of the doubt now ? - Seeing customers and media perception (especially seeing MSI promises) and not having any comment on them, any try to address the issue as soon as possible (so there's as little damage as possible), isn't AMD concerned that the whole community will be less trustful of ANY marketing and promise going further ? Isn't that a bigger price to pay than being honest and trying to work with the partners and the community ? Does anyone at AMD think it's ok to say now that "well, we only said Socket AM4 support, nothing about chipsets" ? How could the community at large realize the difficulty of providing this kind of support when no attempts at it were made and when AMD is being so shady ? Sigh
    37
  37.  @mukkeshmckenzie7386  Guilty! I'm just a bit salty that people still seem to think that Intel CPUs are the same as Sandy Bridge (last great IPC improvement) or Sky Lake (first 14nm ... ish... 5th gen was mostly missing). It's not like Intel wanted the 10nm fab to go so wrong and be 2-5 years late. They didn't plan for 100-200 MHz improvements for 5 consecutive years. It's surprizing how far they managed to get with 14nm and how they can still somewhat compete with AMD, which are on a much better manufacturing node.
    34
  38. I think that at this point you can safely go with "Undecided with Matt 'Dad Jokes' Ferrell" :D Then you won't have to apologize anymore.
    34
  39. I can't nag the feeling that one day, we'll miss X for its ability to run remote desktop environments. That is, having a thin client and all processing to be done on the server. That is still a thing today and will surely continue to be.
    33
  40. But Asianometry doesn't have videos exclusively about Asia. Since I'm romanian, I very distinclty remember his video about the Moldavian oligarchs. And recently he has one about Serbian semiconducts and one about Yugoslavia. Jon really is a man of culture.
    32
  41.  L Dikx  Not fully serios, but you do realize that Napoleon was a corsican, which is italian culture, and that Corsica was only recently occupied and not even properly annexed by France when Napoleon was born ? Napoleon's father was from Tuscany and his mother was genoese. His primary languages were corsican and italian and only at the age of 9 or 10 he learnt french. Not to mention that his family actually fought agaisnt the french, trying to maintain Corsica independent. In others words, he's not that much french in origin. Which explains his military prowess :P
    31
  42. 10:41: "We've got the input list just here... same elements as before, I think..." "Well, you wrote it, mate!" =)) What's a Creel playing both the teacher and the student for our amusement. Question: for integers, if you know you're big-endian, isn't it easier to simply build the counter array to have power-of-two buckets (like 8 or 16) ? And then, instead of doing mod 10, simply read the relevant 3-4 bits, put in the relevant bucket, and so on. You also have to make sure to have the sign bit in it's own step. Also, would it help to construct all the count arrays at once, so you only traverse forward the array once ? It uses a bit more memory, but arrays of 16 integers... doesn't sound that bad. Worst case for normal integers would be to compare 64 bit signed integers, and that would amount to 64/4 + 1 = 17 count arrays (the extra one is for the sign count array). Cheers!
    30
  43. You used "decimal places" in many places where "digits" was the correct word. Other than that, nice video :)
    28
  44. The graph at 3:00 is classic NVidia shenanigans. These guys are totally incapable to ever produce a graph that's both correct and not misleading. And useful. Other than that, yeah, good corrections. There's even more minor corrections, if someone would be pedantic. I think that Theo deep down knows he's not accurate / properly correct, but overall he gets the big idea pretty well. Edit: one thing that I can give Theo is that he does listen to the suggestions and corrections, well, as much as he can take in a limited amount of time. You can see in this video that when he showed the fast inverse square root he didn't say that John Carmack invented it. That's an improvement on his part.
    28
  45. Regarding logging in as another user (either fully, or just in a terminal session) is that yourself can be a danger. Say, you do take a break and come back some time later and forget that you're logged in as root (I know, in terminals you have a different prompt, but not everybody is used to that). And if you forget that you're logged as root, you might do things that you don't want to do. Commands that you run and that create files or folders, they will be owned by root. And you might find out later that your user doesn't have access to them or that some daemon cannot interact with said files anymore or things of that nature.
    27
  46. I have to say, I'm a bit baffled that this isn't obvious to everyone.
    27
  47. Jorge is an IDIOT! LOL
    27
  48.  @Marlow925  What you say about the car having the option to be the fastest when there are multiple stops is true. However, there's two things which actually makes this impractical and which subway trains (only more than a century old idea) solve effortlessly. 1) Throughput: 4400 passangers per hour is super low. Make another stop at a stadium and you'll have 50 000+ angry people who can't get to /out from the stadium. Ok, not everybody will have to use this, but however you want to expand this, the very very low capacity that single cars have will immediately become very painful. 2) Cost: Having a lot of cars for 1-4 people is not efficient. Not only the car themselves will be quite expensive, but the operating cost will be quite high too. A car carrying 1-4 people and weighting 1 tonne is not efficient. Also, they'll have to recharge the battery (which will wear out) several times per day, which complicates things by quite a bit. A train can have powered lines, so no need of a battery which will inevitably become waste, and the weight to people ratio is much better, effectively more efficient. However you take it, if you have to scale it, the cars won't work, and the train will be the best option. Unless you want to keep it exclusive and expensive. In the end, I really don't understand what are people so excited for. I mean, yeah, nice, a new route was made, some stuff is easier to reach. But the technology is absolutely nothing new. Some say that the tunnelling was done much cheaper, but I really don't see that either. Maybe it's on the cheap side, but surely not 10 times cheaper or anything close.
    26
  49. I meaaan, it's still a good language. And if you do like it, then it's perfect!
    26
  50. Ok, here's a hot take: I fully disagree with Drew. Well, most of his points are actually ok, and I agree with some (like decoupling GNU and FSF and the need for new licences). But I said fully disagree because I totally do not agree with the method of achieving said reforms. There is this case that FSF is kind of tone deaf, that is extreme in its philosophy. I do think that is good. That is should stay that way (off topic and that Richard Stallman should stay in FSF, including leading it). Why (to answer Brodie's question in the end) ? Because it is objectively pure. It is a golden standard. When FSF endorses something, so far you can be sure that it actually, absolutely is free software, no "practical considerations", no "in a manner of speaking" no "for all intents and purposes" and so on. That is very valuable. If someone like Drew likes to improve the situation and cannot do so with/within FSF for reasons like FSF being very rigid, I don't understand this need to change FSF, when it has a clear stated goal and philosophy. He should begin another foundation and achieve those things like that. A milder FSF, more in tone with the masses I'm sure would attract a lot of people that are in the sentiment of FSF, but are not willing to go to the lengths that Richard Stallman go (and why I have huge respect for him). This doesn't have to be at the expense of the current FSF, it should be alongside. Also, I cannot agree with that 5-year-old mentality that if red people are known to be good with something, then to have blue people good with that, we should put blue people in charge. That's downright insulting for anybody with 3-digit IQ. If the blue people want to weave, then they should start learning. And only deal with the cases when they are not allowed to learn, that's the only thing that should be done. Equality of chances, not equality of outcome. Leadership should be on merit. Assuming that blue people need to be put in charge automatically assumes that both red and blue people are tribalist cavemen-level people who cannot be impartial and cannot see value in the people of other color. How can I take this man seriously when he's so gigantically wrong about such a simple issue ? Also, that "we're told that unfree Javascript" is stupid and cringe, I have to agree. That should be improved. By FSF.
    24
  51. One important piece that I don't think it was mentioned (let me know if I missed it) is that Varia is open source, using Mozilla Public License Version 2.0
    24
  52.  @OutLanderUSN  I think that JetBrain's model is pretty good. You pay at one point (you can make it subscription, but you don't have to). You get the latest version at that time + whatever releases for the next year. Which should also include minor/security updates that come even later, though I'm not 100% sure. Maybe it can be a bit better defined, but, yeah, it would make sense to have a way to rebuy it (without you going out of your way to do so) after some time has passed and/or some notable improvements have been made, to keep the ecosystem healthy.
    24
  53. In regards to "Ed". Is there any other editor in this 14 text editors list that can open/operate a file of any size ? I ask because at one time I had a log file which was like dozens of GB big. From what I remember I couldn't open it neither in vim neither in nano, because they tried to load the whole file in RAM, so unless you have excessive RAM sizes, it will crash. I don't remember exactly what I did, I think I searched how I can split it and chunked it.
    23
  54. A bit curious that a low-end OS, especially one that has "Legacy" in its name is 64bit only. No love for 32bit anymore. Oh well, by this time I guess only Gentoo makes sense to install on TRULY old hardware.
    23
  55. Now we only need GIMP 3.0 to launch to wrap up this year. With a proper 5% Linux market share :)
    23
  56.  @barongerhardt  Or converting from inches to feet then from feet to miles. Then to combine it with pounds, ounces and gallons for a true suicide-inducing experience. No, sorry, I'm too accustomed to the 21st century. Don't want to start daily using such prehistoric things. I'm kidding a bit, and I know that the imperial system isn't prehistoric. But it kind of is archaic in nature, even if it didn't existed like in the 2nd century BC. And it really is counter-productive, that's why I'm so against it. People should really make an effort and get rid of it.
    23
  57. It's ok, Intel is really small and obscure.
    22
  58. That's a good argument. Also, isn't having more complex instruction going to help with program size, which also helps with cache hits ? That is, using an overly simple example, we can make a 128 kB program with RISC, but with CISC that can probably be done in just 64 kB, and that 64 kB might fit exactly in the L1 cache, and lo and behold, speed improvements! Not to mention, that I think there should be cases where an instruction would simply be faster than multiple instructions ... actually, with out of order and speculative execution maybe not. The idea is that you might need to use some extra steps or registers, while in a single instruction, the CPU could optimize it further. Though I'm just theoretical here, no idea if it's actually the case.
    20
  59.    But that would not count ifs and fors and whiles. And sometimes there's significant work done there.
    20
  60.  @WyzrdCat  It's not obvious to me why it's confusing. I guess the American english has some rule on it ? I'm not native english speaker btw. And I say that it seems obvious to me, because it's something that I don't see why it would have a grammar rule about it.
    20
  61.  @spicynoodle7419  Not sure if copium or trolling. Devs are not abandoning RT, though you can say that the adoption rate is still rather slow. But unlike things like PhysX, it won't disappear. Soon all AAA that care about a graphics score will have RT. On the indie scene it will be probably completely missing for many years, except things made with Unreal Engine with Lumen. Probably Unity will have something like that too in not-so-distant future, if it doesn't already have (didn't check)
    20
  62. In regards to "not forking Chromium" vs "use OS-based rendering". My take on this, is that they simply use whatever rendering engine is installed. The rendering engine (webkit, for example) will be used by the browser like "hey, here's the HTML + CSS, give me pixels to show on the screen". Inherently, it cannot mess with privacy, since it cannot know where that HTML+CSS comes from, it has no access to things like cookies, it doesn't know and cannot connect to anything external and so on. I'm not so sure on the Javascript side, but I'm pretty sure that JS will be run separately, or containerized somehow. So, the browser, whatever DuckDuckGo are working on, will manage things like connecting to the server, fetching the files (what you can do with cURL), managing cookies and local storage, and so on, and on this level you have privacy concerns. So that's why I think they're going for this approach. No need to fork and maintain the rendering engine, they'll use whatever is available, since it cannot interfere with the privacy. And using it as an external program is different than forking it, even though it's, I guess, more on the nuance level.
    20
  63. Very well said!
    20
  64. But it launched 5 (five) (two less than 7) years ago...
    19
  65. My stupid brain initially read that as "Cheese from Switzerland" 😄 I might be hungry...
    19
  66. It actually predates Linux. X11R3 was released in 1988 :))
    18
  67.  @JoeX92  It's certainly very influential. But I'd argue that both Google and Microsoft are an order of magnitude more influential. One has made its name a common word, synonym with "web search", while the other changed 2 keys on the keyboards - the Windows key (was called "super" before) and the copilot BS key (which I don't like nor agree, but only someone already extremely influential could've imposed something like this). As such, I'd say that Adobe is nowhere near that influence. They're really only massively influential in design. Non-tech people do know and heard about Google and Microsoft. While Adobe some do, but not all.
    18
  68. Enjoy the 130% improvement :)
    18
  69.  @david-3172  Still, give credit where credit is due. I'm still only 1% towards that 1 million dollars, as are most of its viewers.
    18
  70. Regarding your second point, yes, I have to commend Brodie for finding, researching and presenting good, relevant topics. Actual good journalism work over here.
    18
  71. Louis, as others said in the comments, the NY lady said PO box 842, but you asked the Maine lady PO box 248
    17
  72. I was thinking of that. If Kent had the audacity to tell Linus to build a filesystem (which he already did, but that's besides the point) then he should try to build his own 30 million code kernel and see how easy is to review thousands of lines of code dumped all at once expecting to be done in one day. And not realize that if everybody did the same, you'll get to to 100k lines of code to be reviewed in 10-20 hours. Really smart of you Kent, really smart!
    17
  73. I think the FSF attitude is EXACTLY what is needed and what they should do. No cracks in the armor as you say. It protects us from getting complacent and "slowly boiled". It protects against slippery slopes. It defines the golden standard and is very nice to see people catering to that, despite the immense hurdles in doing so. It really saddens me the stance of many people who think FSF as irrelevant or extremists just because they actually stand by their stance and don't compromise on their ethics. They are important to see what the golden standard is. It's up to you how much of it you want. In practicality, for now, going 100% is very limiting. But that's the good thing, we know, we are aware of that! If you want to go full privacy and full freedom, you know what to do, you know how to get there, you know what you have to ditch. And I haven't heard of an FSF endorsed software to be actually non-free in any regard, so they are doing a good job there, as far as I know. It also REALLY saddens me that some people think that endorsing FSF somehow needs that you yourself, on all your computers, have to run 100% free software and then they see the impracticality of it (like Richard Stallman going without a cellphone and running 15 year old laptops) and promptly reject the idea in its entirety. When it's actually should be used a sign that more work has to be done to get free software to be a decent alternative. You can run and use whatever you want, just try to help the idea (mind-share, testing, documentation and, of course, programming & others) to move it into a better place. Its akin to someone seeing a poor, weak person, which is poor and weak of no fault of its own, and being disgusted by it and running away from it. That's not the right attitudine, that person should be helped. Same with free software, it should be helped so it grows into a decent alternative.
    17
  74.  @anderdrache8504  Nice!
    16
  75. While I don't like the guy, I think Steve Jobs actually wanted to make computers better for everyone.
    16
  76. While I hate Microsoft about as much as Apple nowadays, your take on Windows in this specific case is totally wrong and uncalled for. Only Windows was affected because only that update was affected. Windows doesn't have anything worse than Mac or Linux here. Also Mac and Linux could've been just as much affected. That whole section is very cringe. Edit: I mean the section starting at 3:35 The rest of the video is a-ok
    16
  77.  @electrolyteorb  You are coping. Yeah, the memory bandwidth is significantly below. But you can have 96 GB of (V)RAM (110 if you use Linux) avaible. Your 5090 won't be as good and fast once it's bottlenecked by the normal dual-channel system RAM which even on high-end desktops (that aren't something like Threadripper) maxes out at about 120-140 GB/s
    16
  78. But nobody questioned their ability to make decisions. It's just that in this case, they DECIDED to use GPL code. So they should release the source code of whatever they built using that. I think it's only fair this way. You get something for free, you give something for free. And this way the society evolves, as you can continously build upon what's been already built before, no need for every company/developer in the world to create everything from scratch, that would be, globally, such a waste of effort.
    16
  79. Brodie, you know you've made it when NVD preemptively takes action so your video is much less damaging. Quite the reach!
    15
  80. Can't wait for Jeff Geerling to announce a new line of his famous t-shirt: "It's been 0 days since I last compiled Linux" - Thank you Igor edition. I don't use Gentoo, but that is exactly what I plan to switch to. Even without that, this is such good news to me, I love seeing things like this. Uncluttering, simplifying, reducing complexity are among the most satisfying things you can do in big projects.
    15
  81. Didn't Brodie said in the video that if you're CNA for a project you own, only you can issue a CVE for that project ?
    15
  82.  @privateanon7623  Yeah, but you need to see the bigger picture then. There are cases where it should be on release. Like allowing drag-and-drop (which Carmack mentioned). Whatever happens directly on press has be easily undoable (like on a virtual keyboard) or not that important.
    15
  83. "There is no excuse" here's one: it barely had people working on it for the fist, like 8 years ? To be honest, I don't know exactly how it was, but that can be an excuse. Even a decent one. People back then didn't yet realize the need for building something new.
    15
  84. If memristors ever become a thing, maybe then. The idea is that it will enable non-volatile memory, a bit faster than RAM. So me might not need L1-L3 cache. Or maybe just L1. And we'll no longer have RAM and HDD/SSD, just memory. But it's been years since I've heard about that and still nothing, I'm kind of leaning on that being just wishful thinking instead of "cool new tech that's still stuck in the lab phase".
    15
  85. What was wrong with the showoff ? I especially like that it's on point and has no wasted time or text on marketing bullshit. Though you guys seem more focused on the audio and video, which I can't say I saw anything major that was off.
    15
  86. Fish with shell mommy - now your terminal is truly fishy!
    14
  87. I was thinking the same. "Hey I have this massive powerhouse of a CPU with 64 threads and 128 GB of RAM" - proceeds to install the most minimal config, using binaries whereever possible.
    14
  88.  @Novascrub  Yup, I thought the same. The first one is a bit debateable, but the second one is totally not a critique or showing ffmpeg as being inferior. The whole thing is stretched .... a lot.
    14
  89. One vibe, I don't know why, it doesn't even matter how hard I try
    14
  90. About 3) Can't they simply replace the whole tank with one that has a new pump ? And then fill it with hidrogen ?
    14
  91. Hey DT, don't change the keyboard! How else are we going to know how strong and complicated the password is ?
    14
  92.  @pacman_pol_pl_polska  :)) Not hibernating, but I am more function over form. I guess I simply don't care that much.
    14
  93.  @cameronbosch1213  WTF did you smoke ? There's plenty of stuff to complain about Mozilla but them being worse that Google certainly is not. That's like saying that some psycho that killed a person is worse than Stalin. Like, do you even thought a bit about it ?
    13
  94. "for the therapist to tell you the answers you already knew" -- have you actually went to a therapist ? Because I highly doubt it's going to tell you things you already knew.
    13
  95.  @yatinarora1252  Conceptually is EXACTLY sharding.
    13
  96. The study is from 2021. It would be nice to have one from 2024 too, some of the slow languages have improved.
    13
  97. I mean, it's not NASA's fault that it's massively underfunded. I'd say they still are doing very well given the circumstances. The recent Mars mission was a massive success. If only it would receive the money that SpaceX are burning, then it would be much better, though it will still be a very little budget.
    13
  98. I would argue that having processes that are tightly coupled are a direct violation of UNIX philosophy. One of the main takeaways of "do ONE thing and do it WELL" is that it can be used with other programs. That is, a "business" need can be done by simply running a specifically crafted chain of commands (programs). The "one thing" part mentioned before helps so that no matter the context, the program has no side/unwanted effects and doesn't waste resources for something you don't need. If you need something extra, it can be provided by another program or with an option. However, if your program is tightly coupled with another, well, then you don't have one program that does one thing and does it well, you have 2 programs masked as one, so essentially one program that does two things. Not being able to run a program with all its features standalone compromises its interoperability and use for composing a bigger program. Which is exactly what the UNIX philosophy stands for, whatever bigger/complex program you need, you can build it by using small dedicated programs. With systemd's dedicated programs you can reasonably build a single program: systemd itself. In conclusion, systemd is mostly a monolyth. It gets away because it does its job pretty well, it does cover most of the needs that people have. But not the concerns about its future.
    13
  99. 3 years ? How can you be so misinformed ? It will come next year, Elon said it since 2014 or so, you should've known by now!
    13
  100. Yet AMD had to pause for a while to make a new CPU from scratch and now, many years later after 2600K, their 2600 is about the same or slightly better in gaming. I wouldn't say it's Intel's fault here. Do you know that an 4.7Ghz overclocked 2600K still has better Cinebench single core score than an overclocked R7 1700 (and R7 1700X and R7 1800X) ? Granted, that in stock the i7 is lower vs R7 stock. Also, on CPU benchmark the i7 2600K has a single core score of 1941 vs 2006 and 2009 of R5 2600 and R7 2700. So after all these years, the single core performance is marginally better for stock speeds and slightly worse (though for Ryzen 2 it should be the same) for single core. The problem with Intel isn't lack of technological advancement (at least until now). It's their bullshit marketing, their thermal interface solutions and especially their greed in constantly jacking up the prices.
    12
  101. "... for people who aren't used to imperial". Or, how they are usually called, humans. Can't wait for US to ditch the imperial system.
    12
  102. Awesome, now that Theo switched to Zen, thanks to Firefox being so open and customizable, maybe now we can have more contributions to Firefox and somebody very known and vocal who can trash the websites that DECIDE to not support Firefox for absolutely no good reason (which is easy to prove when you change the user agent to appear like Chrome and see that evrything works perfectly). Theo, here's the formal request to revisit Firefox (like, say, when version 135 arrives) and do a video of what it is missing from it, what is wrong, what is insufficient and so. For me it's still my browser simply because of full open source and it works good enough for me. On the developer side, the fact that it has on the network developer tools the "Edit and Resend" makes it better than Chromium-based browsers. Not to mention that for mobile, it's the only one that supports extensions.
    12
  103. Hmmm, 64 threads vs 4 threads, that's 16 times more. And those results... most of them are around 14 times faster. Which means that the average per core is slower than Phenom's II, lol. If I had to guess, I think it's because of the frequency.
    12
  104. Or ... a forum thread ... sigh
    12
  105. I actually do have respect that he went there himself. Stupid, but respectable.
    12
  106.  @rossmanngroup  I want to challenge that decision. Why is it more important to have foolproof levels of security, but only for a handful of users, rather than focus on making the OS widely available, even if the secutity features drop by half (maybe the privacy ones too). I'm sure it will still be much better than what those other phone have originally (cough Samsung cough). Making it mainstream, not just for Pixel phone would mean, what, 10 times the potential users ? Isn't that much better for the goal ? Isn't that much more helpful for the global phone landscape ? Wouldn't that more easily bring people to also contribute (bug reports, code and financially) ? Of course, it would also increase the stress, from more exposure. But I think it would be tolerable.
    12
  107.  @BrodieRobertson  It still has that .gitignore file :P
    12
  108.  @BrodieRobertson  I get the "historic" ? part of "tiling" = tiling manager, but I don't think it should be a be-all end-all argument. Like Nicco said, while it's barebones, so to speak, or lacking, it's still tiling. Calling it like that it's the most descriptive way. I don't think a new term should be invented for this, I think the "in Linux, tiling means X" people should adjust. That's what makes the most sense to me, and what makes sense for the future (where, to a new guy, all these terms should make sense). Eventually we can maybe call this "manual tiling", versus "automatic tiling" and make sure to simply not use just "tiling".
    12
  109.  @mrdot1126  Yeah, I concede, the price is pretty good. I'd still argue that it's a bit apples to oranges since these tunnels presented here are really small. In the car costs I don't know... it does sounds like the Teslas are better in every way, except that the subway takes, what, an order of magnitude less space ? And I don't know how much power it uses, but it surely isn't the same as 60 model 3s or Ys, since the total weight is at least several times less. Oh, and it doesn't have heavy, polluting-to-make, fast-aging batteries. No matter how you cut it, using cars only works if you have a very low to low volume of people needed to be transported. In the case presented here it works. But for a whole city ? Yeah, right. Nothing revolutionary here, sorry, this isn't the future of transportation.
    12
  110. LoL sweetmelon3365 and folksurvival, I think you need a thicker skin. I mean, I don't want to say there is no chance that the dev is a cuckoo-head, you never know. There has been signs, so it is good to be guarded. But also not overreact.
    12
  111.  @miljantrajkovic1862  Yeah, tell that to my grandma! You people (you and Edward) are insane with statements like "noone is using the applications grid" or "I don't know anyone who uses the applications grid". Having keyboard-centric power-user interface is very good, but it shouldn't be at the expense of mostly-mouse driven interfaces that casual people (which are the vast majority) know, like and use. This is one of the STILL ongoing problem for Linux which really hinders it's mass adoption.
    12
  112. Several more comments like this and you'll get a job offering from LMG :)
    11
  113. LoL, that WOULD be funny!
    11
  114. This needs more upvotes. Surely Louis would chuckle seeing it.
    11
  115.  @justanothercomment416  Any sources on that ?
    11
  116.  @harrytsang1501  The hardware acceleration is a very good point, if it can be used it will be indeed be both very fast and energy efficient. Regarding the dead-end part, I might've jumped to conclusions too soon. Unfortunately I don't remember anymore the bigger list of limitations or downsides it has. From what I remember it was the max resolution and the lack of progressive decoding that were major hurdles. As in, it's almost as new as JPEG XL and it already has known downsides, why get used to them instead of jumping directly to the overall better format ? Now if these can be added in then... I'm not against having more formats. As long as we don't get to 14 of them :D
    11
  117. "If Zelensky's Ukraine is independent who do they need US money?" Can you ask a more idiotic question ? Jeez Louise, where are you folks coming from ? I wish that someday you face what Ukraine is facing and then amaze us with your amazing problem solving.
    11
  118. Can't wait for Framework to release their laptops with that. Which has good support for Linux. We're slowly getting to actual 8+ work hours of battery life in non-Apple land too.
    11
  119. Funny thing is that Servo was started by Mozilla. And parts of it are in Firefox for some time. But apparently the full thing is just a lot of work. But recently is has gotten under the wing of The Linux Foundation Europe and it seems to be getting steam again, that is a healthy dose of work put on it. The landscape of browsers in 2026 might be very different. We'd have Ladybird just for having better web standards and Google not going ham anymore. And Servo for speed and efficiency. And browsers no longer being single core bursty loads but also be very performant on 2-4 of efficiecy cores in a smartphone or a lowed laptop, instead of needing high clocked high performance cores.
    11
  120. Yup! And not just there, but everywhere there's any sort of problem solving or tinkering with. The only places (cannot find a better term) where it's not needed is in (usually) tedious, repetitive well-defined tasks. Or by being a soldier who has to strictly follow orders. But even in those cases, you need to have a desire to do better to improve yourself and the way the task is done, in order to advance to a better position. And nobody will spoon-fed you that.
    11
  121.  @flannn6  You stopped having any credibility of actually knowing a bit of what you're saying when you wrote "browser-bound".
    11
  122. What I see at 4:04 if you pause and go frame by frame is that the AI started to change things it shouldn't too. First instance at 4:05 wheere it says it was $0.00340 to store in WorkerKV and the AI simply replaced it to $0.002 even though that $0.00340 wasn't part of the previous computations. Not gonna lie though, overall it's still neat, but I don't think I'll ever get over this "I have to recheck every little thing it changed, to be sure". Nice that it shows it with color highlighting.
    11
  123. Your calculation is quite off. First of all, I don't think it will be 30 days per month. Did I miss there being a mention about working in weekends ? Normally you have 20 to 22 working days in a month. But also... it said PART TIME. So no 8 hours per day.
    11
  124. Regarding that a11y thing: it would be nice if ALL people would learn the VERY BASIC, common sense, bare decency and courtesy of SPELLING all acronyms (and now numeronyms too) before using them. That is, the first time it is used, say/write Accessibility (a11y), then you can use it as a11y in the rest of the talk/page. Why is it so hard ?
    10
  125.  @Nekomusu  *Microsoft. And, yes, you're right.
    10
  126. The hell is wrong with you ? Firefox is an excellent browser (still). And it's the most standard compliant browser. And while I'm certainly not a fan of current day Mozilla, and their focus on SJW and less on things like ... proper financing, I still think that "dumpster fire" is a bit of an exaggeration. Checking the landscape, it can be (MUCH) worse...
    10
  127.  @Peterowsky  And that's because Pornhub actually provides a service. Reliably.
    10
  128. I don't fully agree with the "Again with the "not making the mistakes of X11" and then basically inventing a whole new class of mistakes. " part. Yeah, it's tedious and bothersome, especially because how stubborn the Wayland devs are. But it's not this progress ? Aren't the things that are done/finished in Wayland working great ? And regarding on "mistakes" isn't this excessive discussion and Wayland devs being ... defensive? a good way to not let bad stuff in ? Yeah, it's annoying, it can be VERY slow, but at least when it's done, it's GOOD! I think it's better to have the difficult questions and stuff be upfront than to have to constantly rework and patch later.
    10
  129. I ran "lscpu" today, to see how much L1 and L2 cache I have and saw that you have there listed the mitigations enabled. Apparently I don't have them all on. But not all off either. I didn't changed or did anything about them, even though I'm tempted to leave them off, the CPU is old, and I couldn't refuse any performance improvement. But at the same time, I DO have many apps, I do browse the web, I do have some proprietary apps, so I absolutely have to have the mitigations enabled. Sigh.
    10
  130. If Arch is the IKEA of GNU/Linux, then what is Gentoo ? And, just to be sure, in case you or somebody else was thinking of it, using Gentoo in this analogy is not you being the carpenter. You're still not writing code.
    10
  131. Ok, fine, you convinced me, Gentoo is the carpenter and Arch is the IKEA. Nice points made!
    10
  132.  @Firestar-rm8df  Regarding that Memcached vs Redis... They're both in C. Please do the minimal amount of research before spewing such BS, you're wasting everyone's time. Also, Redis is single threaded especially for the speed it gives when you have no context switch from one thread to another. But memcached has other benefits.
    10
  133. did you meant to say "immaturity" ?
    10
  134.  @JimmyCall  Some people actually like having the ability to talk with other people. Shocking, I know.
    10
  135.  @haliszekeriyaozkok4851  What the hell are you talking about ? I can only agree with the wordpress and its (not "it's") plugin system sucking. Though it was mostly not the system itself but the vasy majority of plugins being horribly written by people who barely started to understand programming and who couldn't care less about having things well organized. But just how the system allowed crap code, it was also not stopping you writing good code. Though I also haven't checked wordpress in more than 8 years, maybe things have changed. But the rest of your complains I have no idea about. What do you mean you cannot use variables with ease ? What errror messages are ugly ? Other than getting an untranslated error from ebraic or whatever that was some 10 years ago, I never had problems with errors not being helpful. Why do you need keywords for defining variables, what does that add, other than bloating the code ? You don't need to use associative arrays WTF, you can and SHOULD use objects and interfaces whenever you need to ensure you're getting everything you asked for, in the format/types you need it. What utf-8 support is missing ? And for most web-related stuff, PHP is not slow.
    10
  136.  @adriankal  Yeah, composer appeared also about 10-15 years ago, and immediately made having modules a reality. That's why Symphony modules are used in all kinds of projects, not just in Symphony. PHP of 15 years ago is really different from current day. The features, security and tooling have improved drastically since then.
    10
  137. I was thinking the same thing. Unfortunately, doing the right thing will be very expensive in terms of money, time, effort etc. I don't know how the justice systems everywhere are getting more and more complicated, bloated to the extreme, that only people who have YEARS and YEARS of study can make sense of all the rules, and yet, the results is that the justice is a total joke. It does work in normal cases. But whenever is a little entity vs a big powerful entity, you have absolutely no guarantee of even the slightest fair and just and overly long, time-consuming, MONEY-consuming trial.
    10
  138. Well, Apple kind of does. It's when it does it at the expense of customer choice or right to repair or other common-sense things that it's triggering people like me. However this transition to ARM is a perfectly normal decision. It's already looking to be another one of the "the right decision at the right time" ones.
    10
  139. I feel the same.
    10
  140. @Lucas - It's really not that simple as Ctrl+f, nor just sort. Clearly not rocket science either. Though if it was just Ctrl+f then it would make even MORE sense to hire someone, because you (or Linus) HAVE MUCH BETTER THINGS TO DO. It's like "You hired someone to clean the office?"
    9
  141.  @BrodieRobertson  I commend you on not specifically call him out, I would have. I mean, I like the reporting he does but that particular video was just bad. And cringe.
    9
  142.  @zackaboy1236  Nice bait mate. But still a low level troll.
    9
  143. Either that or his thermal paste is getting replaced. Or both. :P
    9
  144. He REALLY doesn't want those cups...
    9
  145. I somewhat agree. But I'd say it's not Wordpress per-se that's pure trash, but some of the plugins that are written for it. WP itself is quirky, but it's not that bad. Admittedly I haven't checked it in several years. I remember it having extremely backwards compatibility which I respect a lot (like still supporting PHP 4 in 2013 or so) That being said, WP doesn't impose any kind of style or order when you make a theme or plugin. And maaaan, by FAR the worst code I saw, things that literally make you shout "HOW TF IS THIS SO F*****ING STUPID?" were in some plugins for Wordpress. Which is partially the fault of WP, but in principle I don't dislike the idea of freedom, so I can't fully fault WP for allowing this kind of dumpster fires. The community should filter out the pure trash plugins and promote sane-written ones.
    9
  146. 1) Paragraphs, man, paragraphs. My head hurts trying to read after the 3rd line, hard to keep up where you are in that wall of text 2) Please switch to what the REST OF THE WORLD (including USA, officially) use and use ˚C, not ˚F. Or at least mention that you use ˚F, you're on an international place.
    9
  147. I think it reduces latency in the event where the busy CEO is doing something else and the other part has to wait for the CEO to handle its request. The ambassador can start handling the request immediately.
    9
  148.  @Speykious  Interesting. Thanks for the explanations and the example.
    9
  149. Romania too! (and Romania had a trumpist candidate that openly visited and supported the polish trumpist) I hope Poland can see through their lies and vote for EU
    9
  150. Yeah, but with their many SJW-type of policies and takes and things like DEI, it's hard for people to trust Mozilla. First thing, I think they need to have a channel for donations that strictly, directly, go to Firefox. There's many people that care and like Firefox, but wouldn't want their money to go to some cancel-culture campaign or whatever they're doing this month, but instead to be assured that the donations go for the developers and testers and UI/UX and so on just to make Firefox better. Hopefully the guy that was supposed to be the next CEO makes it back and takes the position and steers the ship in the right way.
    9
  151.  @ErraticPT  It's low from our perspective. Making a competitive GPU is still REALLY difficult. Remember that it has the same 30W TDP, but more features. Okay, it has a manufacturing node advantage. Still, not that low of a bar as it might seem.
    9
  152. Gamers Nexus: I have a plea for you guys: Could you also benchmark the gaming cards in productivity, so it can be clearly seen why would someone spend twice as much on a card like this ? Or even better, make a dedicated video with these kind of benchmarks for all cards, so you and us can refer to it as what does it actually mean it's not just a gaming card. Because just saying that it's not a gaming card is not enough. This would help with the education of the audience, and hopefully trim a lot from the comments like "1000$ 1070Ti". I know this wasn't the best place to say this (wrong topic), but I wanted a shot :)
    8
  153. Well said!
    8
  154. "Free to play games are complete exploitative garbage" I don't know, I wouldn't call NetHack that... Jokes aside, yeah, all free things need to have a method to pay, a method to support. While I'm young I'm not able to contribute. Or those in poor countries. Now that I'm mid aged, have some disposable income and that I understand that things needs funds in order to have them stay nice, I can donate. Not to all of them, sadly, but, still, it can get sustainable in most situations.
    8
  155. "get investors [...] transfer all the risk to developers". Uhm... no. At least not in this case. CDPR lied and hid the fact that the game is totally unplayable on PS4 (non pro) and Xbox...whatever (I can never remember Xbox idiotic names). Why should investors pay for that (unless they specifically asked for that, but I don't think they did, as it's illegal) ? The risks is about the game idea and implementation not being what the customers or the market wants/like and the product not being able to be sold for a good profit.
    8
  156. Depends on which country in Europe. Western Europe has salaries bigger than 2000 €, for devs as associated roles. But in Eastern Europe (which have a lot of programmers because they can be hired remotely and are cheaper than US and Western Europe ones) it is about right. However, this being a donation means it's much likely that it will be taxed differently, at a lower rate. It certainly doesn't need a cut for a retirement pension. So if you take into account that it's probably 3000 € before taxes for a dev per month, 2000 will make it less than a month, so probably in the region of 5%. While the western europe might have this be 2% or lower of what a company spends on an individual developer. Still, the spirit of the idea stands. If you can't do the arbitrary fixed sum of $2000/year, just do 1% and call it a day. I'd say it's just as good, espcially for a company in a place with lower salaries than Silicon Valley.
    8
  157.  @mruczyslaw50  Pretty sure he was sarcastic :)
    8
  158. That's so stupid I can't even ...
    8
  159. @handlebar4520 The problem is twofold with your view/response/comment: 1. He used hormone levels that AS A PLACEHOLDER, as a simple example, he didn't even remotely said "this is what we need to do". How can you miss that ? 2. What he's proposing totally isn't an ELO system. In an ELO system you gain points for winning (or placing high in this case). It is based on the RESULTS of your matches/runs. Totally not what he said. He even gave the most simple example you can have - weight classes. On a weight class system, someone at 100 lbs will NEVER compete vs a 200 lbs person. That's not how it works. There's clearly defined brackets / segments. With an ELO system, a 100 lbs person might get to compete vs a 200 lbs person and forever be jumping between, say, 180 to 200 lbs competitors. Which, as you say, IS wrong, but, again, what he said totally IS NOT this. I appreciate the percentages. You seem to know some details about the topic. I'm genuinely and unironically baffled how you missed the point so ... completely. I can't think of an easier way to explain it than he did (for something short and on the spot)
    8
  160. While I get the frustration, and that it certainly can be better, the communication, that is. But I also have to point out that it's good that very specific examples arise with Wayland's developers refusing to simply implement something on a simple request. It's like a high barrier of entry (frustratingly so at times) that does, in its way, allow for proper thought on how it should be standardised and implemented. And with the requirements made clear, it's also kind of documenting why X or Y is like it is. And why it exists. So I kind of support their way of asking about the problem, until Every Single Detail is laid out. It does help with building the proper future, so to speak. The "trust the users", even the those users are hand selected to be trustworthy, that does not fly with me. They can be very thoughtful and well-motivated, but going into ALL the details upfront allows for improvements. After all, Wayland is not about simply recreating X, but something better, that's good, efficient and maintainable. For that you need to know exactly what's needed, exclude what's not needed, and have good documentation. In the end, they're the ones which give their sign of approval, so it only makes sense that they ask all the details upfront. And the devil is in the details, never underestimate the ability of a small detail to ruin everything.
    8
  161. Stallman also doesn't use it for the priciple of it. I've never understood, and it pains me, the people that saw Stallman using really old hardware having basically a severely handicapped experience and then they thought to themselves "hmm, nope, I don't want to do that, no FOSS for me". Like, nobody is asking you to go to the same lengths as Stallman, he's just showcasing you just how bad of a situation we're in. If anythink, it should be more of a reason to start contributing to FOSS one way or another, so if people get in a situation where they HAVE to go full FOSS, they won't be so behind in features.
    8
  162.  @oofingberg  why?
    8
  163. Well, Thunderf00t did mention a bit about that. So, you need roughly 1 MWh of energy for a full load of the semi. And in decently good conditions, you can about an average of 10 hours of peak time for solar panels. So to get 1 MWh of energy in a day, you need 100 kW worth of solar panels, that in 10 hours (well, in more than that, but in average) will gather 1 MWh. So, solar panels are usually 20 to 22.something percent effective. That is, they can gather about 20 something of the incoming solar energy which is around 1kW per square meter in a normal bright sunny day. It can go a bit more than that, though not by much. And when very bright, you usually have the problem of cooling the panels, otherwise their efficiency drops when overheated. So, let's assume the panels are at 25% efficiency. That means than 1 square meter of that can generate 250 W, so in one hour it will get 250 Wh of energy. Simply put, 4 square meters make 1 kW. To get to our 100 kW worth needed, we simply need to multiple the above figure by 100. So a megacharger needs gasp 400 sq.meters of good solar panels, and to run in good conditions, which California does have, but the northern part of USA and most of Europe (or rest of the world, really) do not. Now, usually a solar panel is bigger than a square meter, but less than 2. So the number of typical solar panels would be between 200 and 400, with a strong bias to be around 300, I'd say. Actually, if the conditions aren't that great or the efficiency is not the 25% I used... well, then having 400 might actually be the more realistic number.
    8
  164. I think you meant 3, not 300 billion dollars
    8
  165. If they start talking about socio-political issues, you tell them politely that it's out of scope of the FOSS project. If they continue to do so, then they are not respectful and can be booted off from the project.
    8
  166. That lawsuit idea is not bad, though I'm not sure how feaseable it is. But, backed by FSF or by somebody else, a lawsuit would be a public good, there have been cases where the license was not respected.
    8
  167.  @ahmedbathily7013  Dude, what the hell, nobody argued that books in general are bad. Just that Uncle Bob put more focus into selling books than into actually helping the industry.
    8
  168. I'll sound very disrespectful, but this kind of a review (I know this is a refresh, it doesn't matter this time) is ... not good for this type of a CPU. First thing: too much gaming benchmarks. It's a waste of time for everybody. Not even streamers should look for this CPU. So, gaming benchmarks for this kind of a CPU should be between none or at most 2 games, with several seconds of airtime. The other thing: the productivity benchmarks... are too few. This kind of CPU is rarely for one person and rendering jobs are not everything. This kind of CPU is mostly used in servers. Besides rendering, there's also databases, of many kinds, applications, web servers and above all... virtual machines. That photoshop score was kind of meh. But how does it do with 6 photoshop at once, each in a different virtual machine ? How about 7 ? Or 8 ? How does the threadripper or R9 3950 fare in this ? How many queries per second can it do ? Requests per second ? How much RAM can it have ? How well does it run a special algorithm ? Or another algorithm, but in 50 instances ? Or Docker container farms ? In this video, W-3175X won confortably the 7-Zip compression benchmark. How many other applications/workloads does it win in ? Probably not many, if any. But we don't know. And this video sheds way too little light. If you start to factor all the things said above, you start to realize that this kind of a review misses the point for this kind of a CPU. It spends too much time on benchmarks that are not relevant, misses a lot of benchmarks or workloads that are relevant, and I guess it also kind of speaks to the wrong audience. All in all I think this is just mostly a time waster. The folks at the big corporations that buy these CPUs don't decide based on this review. And those of us who look at this never buy something like this.
    8
  169. This needs more upvotes
    8
  170. This needs more upvotes
    8
  171. Maan, after all these sponsors, Brilliant still didn't got those 200 people subscribed.
    8
  172. It's not like they know how Android works or how to write code for it. Oh, wait.... But what do you mean slow and Chrome ? Of all the people that still insist on running Chrome instead of Firefox or Brave combined with those that happily ditched Chrome, I heard literally 0 complain about speed. It's either the privacy or some feature that some other browser has (which usually can be had in Chrome too, with extensions, but whatever)
    8
  173.  @NoBoilerplate  tsk tsk tsk, and you said that you can go outside and play...
    8
  174.  @flamingoxe5984  Yeah... uhm, no. Technically it was conquered, and annexed in 1769 (months before Napoleon's birth) after the french troops defeated the corsican republic troops, but wasn't actually (truly) annexed until 1789. In those 20 years it was more or less just occupied. Napoleon's father and Napoleon himself in the early days were coriscan nationalists. Even if technically he was born in the Kingdom of France he has 0% french heritage. He is as french as an austrian who gets french citizenship. It's that simple. Read a bit about it.
    8
  175.  @AutomotiveConcepts  Hey, this is a nerd gathering, get your toned muscular a$s outta here!
    8
  176. Oh! So now that you found out that you're a Mac ... how do you feel ?
    7
  177. Don't want to be an apologist, but I think the reason is about what he said that a new browser has bigger chances. Because of the baggage. Firefox is 2.88% but on the decline. Linux is 3-4% but growing.
    7
  178. Yeah, but in this context Windows wasn't even considered.
    7
  179.  @GamersNexus  This video was a very good dose of severe optimism. I loved it!
    7
  180.  @PerErikKarlsson  It's "better" if there's a low number of people using it and if they want/need privacy. Like a premium option, where you travel alone or just with your friends. For any serious transportation, the subway is the clear winner in cost and throughput.
    7
  181. Yeah, from what I know, there's plenty Win + ? combos that are not taken, and can be used. They won't be as intuitive Win+E opens file explorer, Win+W opens.... something ... screenshot related, Win+L locks the screen. But guess what Win+Q does ? Nothing. At least on Windows 10. Win+Z ? Still nothing. So surely there can be combos found for the Win/Super key that can be easily learned.
    7
  182.  @jabbruh  Yes you can. Since PHP 7.0 (which is many years old), though it wasn't everything at once, bits and pieces got added with newer versions. It's still not perfect, as Nick Hamilton above said, you still don't have typed arrays. But you have classes (first thing they added), you have the base (scalar) types like int or ?int (int or null aka nullable int), you have union types so you can more exactly define arguments and returns (like int|float aka int or float). How many decades ago have you last time checked PHP ?
    7
  183. Fully agree! But, please, split it in two-several paragraphs, it's hard to read.
    7
  184. #HeyDT Genuine question: you stumbled a bit on opening things and getting shortcuts and so on. You've had rofi opened multiple times with "Help and Tips" there. Why don't you try it ? I don't know for ArchCraft how useful it actually is, but I do think (and hope) it should've answered at least some of your questions. And people spent effort making it, it would be a shame to not check it, but get frustrated on things not working.
    7
  185. I remember the new Porsche ... I forgot its model name, but it has a big battery, a bit over 100 kWh, and they weigh at about 600 kg. Now, with this, they could probably reduce that to 400 kg. Maan, that sounds too good to be true. Let's make that 500 kg, and it's still awesome. And on smaller sized cars, having a 30 kWh battery would mean that the car would probably weigh as much as its ICE counterpart. About 1000 kg in total, maybe even less. Exciting times!
    7
  186. Call me pedantic, but I think it would be best to have a fork with the current way of small, required proprietary blobs included, just to be called something else, like Chadboot. And have Libreboot be.... you know... libre? Without any asterisks. Fully, 100% free, like it was before nov 2022. And to have them easy to recognize what they do like "oh, Libreboot is just Chadboot without any proprietary code". It's basically like it is now already, but under two different names, for different purposes and less confusion. Otherwise, I'm happy that both a) they added the proprietary stuff to make it usable on much more systems and b) that they still give you the option of having 100% free software.
    7
  187. Totally! I would be interested to see a 9900K with 4 cores shut down and be compared vs 6700K to see the real difference between Skylake and Skylake+++. Btw, apparently, to Intel, the sky IS the limit LOL
    7
  188. Or the inaccuracy, I assume
    7
  189. So basically you're going to live forever .... longing
    7
  190. Thanks for this comment. I thought too that 80% improvements means 5x performance, but later in the video you gave the example with 15 and 18 compiles per hour so I realized then that the sky is not that blue. In order to have less hassle with this, I'd say to say "improve [...] speed" instead of "improve [...] times". Speed is [things] per [time], say compiles/hour in this case. It should be more easily understood intuetively (and correct, to boost). A compile (build or whatever else) time is measured in seconds. Improving it means reducing the number of seconds to compile. So here it's reasonable to believe that 50% improvement means 50% time reduction aka twice the speed.
    7
  191. So everything was working for years, and now suddenly, this ? I'm unironically shocked that something like this happened. I also don't understand how the current short term fix (for Ubuntu) isn't simply disabling systemd oomd. It seems that for now, its shortcomings far outweight its benefits. Once it's improved and thoroughly tested, then enable it back. All that swap talk feels to me like missing the big picture - solving the problems that people have NOW first, and do a proper fix later. Jeez, things like this make Windows look good. Sigh.
    7
  192. It is a glorified RDP hardware. And 2 x 4K doesn't need THAT much. You can have good 1080p quality with 10 Mbit/s. 4K is 4 times the number of pixels of 1080p, so AT MOST it would need 40 MBit/s. I say at most, because video streming will be (of course) done using compression (probably AV1) and if the video is not very "busy" in the amount of small details, then the extra pixels won't add much when compressed. So 2x4K would be 80 Mbit/s. Let's round it to 100 Mbit/s and have them at 60 FPS. And no, doubling the framerate doesn't double the size, again, because of compression. Of course, if you have more, it will be better. But I wouldn't be surprised if it would actually be totally fine with 100 MBit/s. Because normal applications have a lot of spaces that are basic and simple. Like margins on a website or on a Word document, that gets compressed very easily. Or the background color of the Excel cells, those are easy to compress too, and also don't move much, so you might get it to look artifact-y only when you scroll, but look crystal clear when you're just typing stuff and 95% of the screen is static. The taskbar of the OS and the menu/top of the app(s) are also very static, so in reality it's like you have fewer number of pixels.
    7
  193. C, done properly, is difficult too
    7
  194.  @MichaelZenkay  That is a good argument, but the numbers still matter a lot. Using more energy for something does, in the end, mean more pollution, since the energy itself, even if solar or wind, pollutes (from manufacturing, repairing and then replacing). But how much more pollution is to be seen. Like mjc0961 said, the difference might be easily offset by simply reusing the bottle. If it's something like reusing 2, 3, 5 or 10 times, then I'd say it's the better option. 10 to 20 I'd say it's questionable, and it would depend on context if it's feasible or not. Higher need of reusing means that yes, just using plastic is actually better (and also more convenient)
    7
  195.  @subbastionbastion2167  It was a joke. You missed it.
    7
  196.  @Ceelbc  Well, to be frank, the less market share Chrome has, and the more Firefox has, the happier I am. So your case is good news to me :)
    7
  197. But isn't that exactly what he's saying here ? A project should be about a single thing. Firefox should be a good browser, not save the planet.
    7
  198.  zz zip  It's a slippery slope. And by that I mean, they have to do it, once you do something in a way, it's basically impossible to go back. That's why we have Wayland and no X12. So they have to keep and maintain the security. Yeah, the other features are slower to come, there's some struggle. But that's why we didn't had it before, because it was hard to make it. Nevertheless, this is progress.
    7
  199. Was waiting for a mention of how right Richard Stallman is about freedom and security. Well, he's more on the software side, but the principles remain. We'll just have to start manufacturing locally chips. Which means they'll be decades away in performance and efficiency. But, hey, for something important, that might still be something better than nothing.
    7
  200.  @WhatsACreel  AI compilers that can do things better than humans! NEVER! Maybe just faster... (insecure human signing off)
    7
  201. If you don't blink, you might be able to see the correction on the top right side sliding into view when he said that.
    7
  202. What do you mean YouTube scanned your computer ? Websites (unless we speak about the "good" old days of ActiveX) cannot do that.
    7
  203.  @johnyang799  What is crap about / in Firefox ?
    6
  204.  @Stuke51  Which codecs ? Or, if it's easier, on what site you can't see/hear stuff ?
    6
  205. Until snaps can have custom repositories, people complaining about it will never stop, even if Canonical will be spotless for, say, 10 years. And while I don't actively complain, I support the camp that complains about it. Really, having the backend closed source is simply a risk. A risk that at one point it will be gone. Or it will turn for the worse. It might not happen, but noone can guarantee it won't. There are many people who will happily use it, and if it goes to the doodoo simply switch to another package format. But some other people prefer stability. That is, they prefer to settle on the better (preferably best) format and then never have to deal with it again. Canonical really is wrong with this approach. For snaps' sake, I hope that they either make the backend open source too, or someone creates a custom backend for a snap repository so people can bypass Canonical's nonsense.
    6
  206. Brodie, your whiteboard gave me an excellent idea... unless someone else had it first. "Wayland" would be a great name for a doom metal band (for those that don't know, doom metal usually has themes like grief, loss, mourning, sorrow, dread and so on). And after 13 albums, to start having angry thrash metal songs too. And only after 21 or so albums, to start singing only happy hard rocks songs. It would mirror Wayland development pretty closely, I reckon. Eternal Suffering would be like the 10th album.
    6
  207. Yup! Very well said. Sad to see all of that being kept "outside" because "CPU costs for old smartphones!"
    6
  208.  @sdrc92126  Up to a point. There's plenty of cases where the space is limited, so the efficiency matters. Yeah, of course, if it costs double to get 10% more energy nobody will buy that. But if it costs 20% more for 10% more energy some people will get that. While it's more cost per watt, it's still less power from the grid which costs even more per watt, so overall net positive.
    6
  209. In this case, I think doing the prevention is actually easier!
    6
  210. Everybody mentions Steam and Proton, but too few mention the DECADES of work done by WINE also with the help of ReactOS developers. Without them, Proton would not exist.
    6
  211. #HeyDT ! Why don't you make the tier list in HTML ? It shouldn't take more than 30 minutes, and doing the list will be MUCH easier. Hunting the layers to precisely click to add a new item and resizing the layers to fit everything in is so silly. Let me know if you want me to do it and share it via pastebin or something.
    6
  212.  @richardharries5825  That's (no offense) one of the most stupid arguments I've ever heard against the elecric vehicles. Did you know that when walking near tall buildings, heavy objects that can fall from the building, like a flower pot, are completely silent ? More silent than an electric car in motion! And yes, that's how stupid your argument is. Jeez!
    6
  213.  @kurnma3776  Also, fun fact. Intel Core chips since Skylake (6th gen) already have these "TPM chips" integrated into the CPU die! You just have to enable it on the BIOS
    6
  214. On mac you deserve the ads
    6
  215.  @TheMr82k  Yup! But... the 90s ? You mean the 80s (and only then the 90s). GNU started in 1983. By the time Linux arrived, only the kernel was really missing.
    6
  216. @Ayy Leeuz I think you confuse "tool" with "abstraction". When you said: "that is not the purpose of abstraction at all. abstraction is not removed from actuality so you don't need to understand how it works in actuality, nonsense. abstraction is a means of simplifying for those who understand" That is totally wrong. That is what a tool (or library in broader computer term) does - allows you to apply your knowledge much more easily, without going into the details, but you have to understand how it works, what it does. An abstraction is just going to give you the ability to use a concept without knowing its implementation details. That includes to not know them at all. Of course, it should still let you know of its limits and side effects, if there are side effects. And because all abstractions have limits, eventually you will learn how they work, when you need something better/different. For example: can someone learning javascript get good at it and be productive, and give out good code without knowing what pointers are or basic structures, like linked lists ? Absolutely! Of course, at some point, it should learn, or it would be good to learn about them. Like say, they start with frontend development, go into backend development, start using databases and at some point they'll need to optimize a query and then learn that there are hash-based indexes and btree based indexes. Because the language (JS) abstracted the memory management, it lowered the barrier of entry, but that doesn't mean those who use it are useless or that whatever they code (until they learn how everything works from the transistor level up) is bad or garbage. It just means that they're limited in what they can do. And that "limited" is actually still quite sought-after and useful these days when there's a lot of programs, apps, APIs and so on, to be built. Blame it on the hardware which allows programs being literally 10000 slower than a decently optimized one to still be useful. Overall I think you're wrong, and I agree with Grog. I hope you never used malloc until you properly learned what it has to do, otherwise you're a bad programmer too and should quit the industry. See how ridiculous it is ? You're basically saying that everybody should know assembler before they can use any other language. Insane!
    6
  217. Half transparency: 150% of the drama of full transparency, 50% of the other transparency benefits. Yup, certainly worse than opaque corps. So much waste on this drama.
    6
  218. Still waiting for a full week in which I hear NOTHING about AI (that is, no mainstream news about AI or mainstream people having takes on AI). I don't think it will happen in 2024 :(
    6
  219.  @alittlelooney5361  How can't you understand the hate ? It's been 11 months of having only X570 chipset capable of supporting Zen2 and Zen3, with everybody (very reasonably) believing that B450 chipset boards will support Zen 3 too, especially since B550 is never to be seen. If someone bought a Ryzen5 3600 two months ago, planning to upgrade to a Ryzen7 4700, with no need of PCI-E 4.0, tell me how could you know that you DO need X570 ? Or why would you spend the extra money on a X570, for 0 benefits ? AMD delayed B550 by one entire year, and they didn't told anything about Zen3 only working on 500 series chipsets. If they either a) announced last year that Zen 3 needs 5xx chipset or b) released B550 when Zen2 launched, then this wouldn't be such an issue now. But, as it stands, AMD just s****ed in the plans and decisions of a lot of their customers, including people who actually paid attention at what they are buying. AMD deserves most of the hate they're getting now.
    6
  220. The good thing ... well, good might be a stretch, let's call it happy coincidence, is that most of these mitigations are done in the hardware in the latest CPUs. The original Spectre and Meltdown, IIRC, are patched in hardware from Intel Core gen 10th onwards, for example. So you might actually not need most of them, depending on the CPU you have.
    6
  221. A unit is $2000, not $6000. At least that's what I understood from the video. The $6000 figure is because it needs 3 panels for 6L.
    6
  222. I call bullshit, until you show how it can be done in np++ (which I assume is Notepad++?)
    6
  223. Yeah, that confused me too. It's written the same exact as the color, WTF
    6
  224. You're not wrong, but overall is not that gimmicky. It's actually really good on old hardware, out of the box (you could, of course have a manually configured Arch or Gentoo for better results. I guess Debian too). Remember that DT chose the "Full instalation".
    6
  225. Confirmed! Intel is a GN shill. They got money from Steve!
    6
  226. No need to wait, tomorrow he'll deliver all of them!! It's really not that hard. Quick, buy more shares and a Vesla car, it would be financially insane not to!
    6
  227. Can't wait for ASUS to release their new motherboard feature: Mandatory Overclocking Normalizing Kit for Enthusiastic Yanks.
    6
  228. Yes, this! Thank you! I complained in the previous video clip that there was a graph that was animated and the ACTUAL graph, with the animated bars in the correct (final) position was visible for less than a second. And before the animation finished, you had no idea where a bar would stop, so the 5 seconds of animation was effectively wasted time (and effort). And it's infuriating because I rarely can properly grasp something like this in just one second. It was a graph with over 10 bars (I think it was countries). So I need to pause to read it. Waste of time. Instead the graph could've been shown for 10+ seconds while the narrator continued to talk.
    6
  229. Yes, but Death would've taken the absolute clown show of watching Elon suffer the humiliation and stress of going down and (some, hopefully most) of its fans realizing just how d00mb they were and how bad Musk was. In the other scenario he would've been martyrized and people would go nuts with conspiracy theories, getting even d00m-ber.
    6
  230. Jeff Geerling in his video said that 3.0 is supported, but not certified, so you have to enable it manually.
    6
  231. The problem with these kind of things is if some demented individual learns to use this, and gets to track you easily, or sabotage you in some way - like make your phone constantly search and report, draining the battery or making Apple think you lost your phone and you find yourself with your phone blocked or who knows what other things.
    6
  232. I thought about it for a good time ago. But you have to realize that having a different OS will increase the testing time for GN by A LOT. I guess literally double the time for some scenarios. It's not just the testing alone, but the installation and maintaining the OS. And drivers on Linux can be quite a PITA. And I doubt they have the time. So, as nice as it would be, since Linux can perform SO WELL (especially when dealing with loading a lot of files and God-knows how many other scenarios), the reality is that it too expensive, effort-wise, to have them. Also, sadly, it's still not so broadly used, though I guess it's also because things like benchmarks aren't that easy to find.
    6
  233. My homie asking the CPU usage and the kernel version but not reading the top part of that conky part. Interesting that there it says 2 GB of RAM being used. I guess it takes into account the cache/buffer part too. But, having multiple tools for the same job, but lacking util-linux and a full featured browser like firefox is ... questionable. I'm curious if there is a good reason behind that.
    6
  234. They're hyping it as if it's absolutely amazing, yet what Boston Dynamics did literally 10 years ago was better. And Musk touting that it can do everything GTFOutta here with your gigantic BS claims. That's the problem. Exaggerated claims. They're just on "meh" level with what they've shown. Assuming they went by themselves. If the Optimus is STILL remotely operated then it's not even close to impressive.
    6
  235. LoL @ Java because they assume the end user and the developer are both idiots - you, sir, made my day :))
    6
  236. I think the $5000 is the filtration system, not the beepy measurement thingy
    6
  237. Sooo, I'm a bit confused. In the end it didn't really mattered the scheduler used, but the file system. Why then the discussion about the schedulers ? Is it because that's what you initially thought was the culprit ? Or you simply wanted to talk about them ? Or something else ?
    6
  238.  @someguycalledcerberus9805  Exactly :D
    6
  239. I think a very good example of how good & useful is awk is the example of a log like the apache access log (in the default format) and properly filter the requests that responded with a 400 or 503 response, given that you can find 400 and 503 in the request address, or in the size or the time it took to complete. Also to filter all requests that are longer than a second for example and many other things like that. It's basically Excel powers in CLI over column-structured data/files (which are common in commands outputs or log files)
    6
  240.  @Twitch_Moderator  17-20% IPC gain seems too much. I wouldn't bet on it. What I heard was 10-15%. Which is still very good. If that's true, then that's enough to actually match Intel in gaming, while obliterating them in every other aspect. R7 4700 or R7 4800 would literally be equal or better than i9 10900K in all scenarios.
    6
  241. I used to like JavaScript (dynamic language, first order functions, prototype based OOP) but I didn't like all the frameworks that emerged from it. jQuery is truly a definition of good library design, as evidenced by its staying power with so little changes. While things like Angular have to keep saying "yeah, the old version was bad, but this new one is good". Anyway, bad comparsion, framework vs library. What I still don't understand, probably because I don't program much in JS nowadays, is why people didn't profit from the awesome prototypical inheritance but insisted into getting back to the classes system. Yeah, it can be done (because prototype based OOP is awesome) but it's like "nah, these round wheels are too dangerous, we must get back to square wheels".
    5
  242.  @mukkeshmckenzie7386  It's hard to say now, but I don't think they got to more than 4 cores (finally) just to combat AMD. I think they genuinely just managed to make work ok then. 8600K was launched only 6 months after Ryzen 1000, which clearly means it wasn't something that they recently started. And I do think they would've released it without Ryzen too. Between 6th and 7th gen - literally 200 MHz more, a joke of an upgrade Between 7th and 8th gen - 2 more cores. Also a bit better clocks IIRC Between 8th and 9th gen - another 2 more cores. Also a bit better clocks IIRC and turbo boost improvements. IIRC it was here that Specter and Metldown had hardware mitigations, so it should be some IPC improvements over 6-7-8th gen when running in safe mode, to say so. Between 9th and 10th gen another 2 more cores, better thermal interface (made the die thinner or something like that). Really pushed the clocks to the maximum. More core and cache tuning options. They DO have A LOT of anti-consumer practices, to this day. Those should be the focus of criticism on them, not the 14nm part.
    5
  243. And that's why it's stated for Alpha release only in 2026. Currently with it you can see/use like half of the websites. About the same % of functionality as some AAA games have at release. I'm sincerely very positively surprised that they said alpha only in 2026, not 2025. It tells me they're realistic and serious about it.
    5
  244.  @kvasir8931  What is wrong with you ? You pay in order to support its existance. It's ok if you don't because you don't have the money (like young people do, or people from poor countries). But having this mentality of "why pay when you can get it free" is so stupid and damaging, it's the reason why we can't have nice things today on the Internet. I really hope that the normal, average person, the ones which also have some disposable income and at least half a brain, get to be normal for them to pay for things they are using and they like. Even if they can access it for free. You don't need triple digits IQ to realize that if almost nobody pays for something, that something will disappear. Or it will get twisted into a horrible disgusting hack of predatory tactics in order to get some money. Then it will disappear.
    5
  245. This is only the 9th time I've read this comment. That's crazy!
    5
  246. Doesn't Linux Mint still JUST WORKS ? Also, they have a Debian edition too.
    5
  247. "Here you can see the lion charging at the gazelle, as he's going to eat .... very soon".
    5
  248. I disagree with the ranking. Yeah, if you know already what to expect, what do you have to do, it is easy. But, in some cases, let's take Gentoo, you do have to learn quite some things for it to work. And as nice as the wiki is, there's still things that you kind of need to know before hand, otherwise you'll be in for a bad time. Like someone mentioned, when it breaks... well, it's not so easy anymore, now, is it ? And just the amount of what you need to learn, what packages do what, what an OS requires in general and so on, there's a lot to learn. That's objectively difficult. Of course, there is such a thing as something being difficult no matter how much you know. I'd say that it doesn't apply here almost at all. Everything related to installing and maintaing an OS is knowledge based. There's no realtime dexterity or attention/observation/perception contest where if you do not act in less than 1 second to an event you lose. Back to the Gentoo example. I can bet you that more than 99% of people who a) didn't used Linux before or know that much about it and b) are not developers, now these people, if you would task them to install Gentoo (as their first Linux install) I bet you that more than 99% won't be able to do it in less than 24 hours. On a computer where compiling everything needed takes less than 4 hours. They'll have A LOT to learn. Well, maybe some may be able to do it faster, if they skip on the documentation, and happen that the code examples all work. If you take out the "time to learn" parameter from the equation, most things in life become easy.
    5
  249.  @danielalvesldiniz  Yeah, it literally is since early-mid 1990s. But I think it matters less right now. What matters is that is on the rise. Multiple people excited for its future. With some companies, like Valve, commited to improve it. Firefox, sadly, doesn't have that. And I'd so wish it did. For me it still runs very good. Though not perfect, as some websites simply don't check for Firefox (which is closest to running the actual web standards)
    5
  250. Yeah, but does KDE have the scheduling optimisation for Alder Lake ? Shit, that sounded like a legit question. Now people will believe I'm an MS shill. MOOOOO
    5
  251. Now I'm REALLY curious... why did work on X been so little in the past 2 decades ? Or I'm wrong ? But it feels like little was added in these many years, hence the appearance and rise of Wayland. Is it because the code is really hard to get into ? Or are the maintainers too restrictive ? Or simply slow ? I also cannot help but wonder how hard would it be to fix X's current issues like multi monitor with different refresh rates. Or freesync. Is something fundamently wrong in the current design of X that make these (nearly) impossible to do ? Or are they simply.... not done ? Anyway, really nice history lesson, I like these, keep it up Brodie!
    5
  252. Couldn't agree more. I really hope that they grow and succeed in making more models. Personally, I do like (and have no problems) carrying a 4.5 Kg (+2 Kg the charger) desktop replacement 17" laptop. It's already over 5 years old and while it still services me pretty well, I drool more and more on the current CPUs (a modern 8 core will be sooo much better than my i7 6700HQ). I'd like a better GPU too, but on this front I'd really like to get an AMD one (currently GTX 1060 mobile) so I can run Linux with no stupid issues. Also, having something much beefier, would also allow me to simply keep it in a low-power state and still have better performance than I have now. I really with my next laptop would be a Framework one, they're by far the ones I'd like to invest my money into. Though if I had to choose, I think I'd get one of those that are tailed for providing Linux installed & working properly out of the box.
    5
  253. Hell yeah! When I have to raise my "max open files" to 100 in my IDE just to be able to have a normal, maybe a bit complex, flow opened and having 5 "Processor.php" files ... yeah, VERY clean, I can't tell which is which, where I started, where I went, so helpful, much productiveness wow!
    5
  254. I think that people ask too much from Valve. They're just a gaming company. The rest of the community should be involved more. Valve won't fix your Adobe Photoshop not working on Linux nor will it make an alternative that's on par with the features of Photoshop. And nobody can ask that of Valve. Also, somebody else mentioned, SteamOS is purpose-built and, in essence, niche. It's if you ONLY want gaming with Steam. We need to see the bigger picture and ensure that complete newbies go to something like Linux Mint which are properly general purpose. Though there's still issues on Linux, hopefully most of them will disappear by the next year. At least I hope that Wayland gets to 99% of the features that X11 has and can actually be used by most people with no hassle.
    5
  255.  @barongerhardt  There are times where you normally use feet but have other things being expressed as "half a mile". Which is 2640 feet in length. Oh yeah, I forgot about yards. Those I haven't used or was forced to use much. Anyway, the age is not exactly an argument. I was using more as mocking, like neatherthal = uses foot, contemporary man = uses meters. First, using "foot" as a measure does come from around the Bronze age. Of course it wasn't the exact foot we have now. But the idea is the same, just that now we have tools and conventions, so it's the same everywhere (well, almost everywhere, that's how "International foot" got to be a thing). The meter is still superior in that it was designed from the start to not be something so subjective like a human foot or cubit or anything else human-related. First it was based on Earth's size, and quite soon a reference bar was created. But to get back on in, ft, yd, miles, pounds, ounces, gallons and the rest, the real benefit of the metric system is indeed that it's all in base of 10. You might barely, if ever need to care about mm in the same sentence as Mm (1000 km), but it does matter immensily. Because you use small units there, which interacts with medium units elsewhere, which eventually matter for big units somewhere else. Not having headaches in converting is very useful, both in time and in chances of mistakes. Basically the context will never matter, since it's so easy to convert from one size to another. Lastly, indeed, our current languages aren't neccessarily better because they are newer. On that, I do regret many new things because a lot of time they shed some old, useful things, just because they feel they won't need them or because they're expensive (like having a phone that can be used for 50 years, not what we have now with smartphones). However, I do have to point that using NAMES in latin has nothing to do with the language being good. Speaking in latin is an ENTIRELY different thing. And, no, basically nobody (including scientists) is speaking latin, which I think you could say that it is counter-productive. I understand your argument, but your example here is really not good.
    5
  256. There's a channel that I've seen a couple of videos, testing Windows 11 vs Linux (usually CachyOS or Fedora) called "CasuallyGamin9". From what I saw there, there were a few games that DID perform better than on Windows. Not so much on the average FPS, but on the minimum FPS (sometimes more than double). If SteamOS launches after this NTsync, or has it included, I'm sure that there will a flood of "SteamOS better performance with Windows games than Windows" reviews from big tech channels like LTT, GN and HU. A man can dream.
    5
  257.  @4mROIdg.JRETZ35l6KtdwE_MRRjkqw  Truly, nothing of value in your comment.
    5
  258. Yeah, but banning the name ??? Is Trump a banned name ? If they really have a problem with politics, they should simply close the threads or posts that are political (and probably asking for trouble). Not banning a name, Jeez Louise!
    5
  259. There's a massive thing missing in your cost plan: the internet connection. Edit: misread, ignore this.
    5
  260. About the safety - that is in theory. In practice, Ubuntu surely has at least 100 things more important than replacing the very stable coreutils. And that can wait until they pass all the tests. I think it's mainly the license as well.
    5
  261. Seeing how much of a power hog they are in desktops, I'm a bit afraid. Coupled with their recent off-the-chart idiot mafia bullying and coupled some more with their bullshit drivers for Linux, I have all the reasons to go for an AMD graphic card on my next laptop. Hopefully it won't be garbage, but given how good RDNA 2 is, I think it will be fine.
    5
  262. But but, a no case IS the best case XD
    5
  263.  @sammiller6631  Wrong. This direction that we're talking about is something objective. When they say that something is free software, it means that the code for the software is available, no binaries. That's not faith, it's not zealotry, is the objective truth. Now, you can say that they are inqusition-level zealous, because they don't compromise. Like, say, for practicality. If the only full free software laptop is one from 17 years ago, then so be it. I like and respect that. Because (here's the big thing) I can always choose how much poison I take. That is, if I go full free software or only partially and how much. And this differs from person to person, everybody has a different tolerance and needs, so what's practically free software might be too compromised and unsafe for others and viceversa. That's why having FSF tied to objectively full free software is very valuable, even if it's impractical (for now). I also value that is shows us how far we are from that ideal standard. Even when that distance is sooo big and they're actually getting blamed for it.
    5
  264. Maybe the developer got hacked because he run the exploit himself, and the hackers posted the exploit on it's repositories. Better safe than sorry.
    5
  265. The jokes about simply waiting for the next generation are starting to get true. I mean, by the looks of it, you can have a GPU at MSRP or something close to that (inflation & extra tarrifs might limit how much the price can be dropped for a current-gen GPU) probably at the end of the year, if not even later, that is one full year or more after they launched. It actually is worth to wait another year or less to get the next gen, or the now-current gen at reduced prices. Fortunately, there's no console launch anytime soon. that surely impacted the production capabilities for AMD.
    5
  266.  @galdutro  Holy crap, that much on Tiger Lake ? 4 cores with 8 threads ? I know that 4c/8t is not much nowadays, but it's not little either. And Tiger Lake is pretty snappy too. How much RAM do you have ?
    5
  267. Well, they did mention the caveats and that there's still juggle room and that it's risky, but they have a chance of going over it. Also, the crisis can be after the war too, and without a collapse.
    5
  268. That's like saying that the tricycle culture is fundamentally broken. Because in the instructions it assumes (to you) that you have to be a Formula 1 race driver. In case my example seems WAAY blown own of proportions, that's exactly what the OP did. It is a really stupid (emotional?) take. So you know the Linux culture after doing one step-by-step guide ? And you think that's what a network admin needs to know to build a corporate network ? My example with being Formula 1 driver to use a tricycle is on the same level, really.
    5
  269.  @aziemelzapratama5257  wait... we're not ?
    5
  270.  @subterfugue  What Hello World said. To simplify it more, it's basically a format which has a specific code for "this file ends here" which windows doesn't go over (it only loads up to that point). Which allows people to add whatever data they want after that code, in the same file. Including compressed data. But it can really be anything. Including one or more icons that can be displayed by windows file manager, regardless of the executable code.
    5
  271. @ Testing ™©®
    5
  272. For me that's why it's so appealing. You can make so many jokes with and about it
    5
  273. Gentoo FTW! I don't know DTs answer though, though I wouldn't be surprised if he answered that some time before. If any case, you might have your answer in the next #heyDT.
    5
  274.  @nephatrine  He's probably amazed how same-ish GIMP is to the '90s version
    5
  275. It's interesting that in all programming 0 means false and non 0 means true, but in the exit codes it's the opposite, and bash knows to do that, to treat a 0 exit code a true value. Neat showing. Basically you'll never use it directly in the CLI (other than maybe testing if you wrote it correctly), but it's one of the foundations for effective, useful scripting. Basically all install scripts use this to check files, directories and permissions, to make sure they're doing the things correctly.
    5
  276. I think that Linus is ok with the english way of pronouncing Linus, because he's usually very pragmatic. It's close enough to be clear it's his name, and it certainly the way people pronounce things can't be changed over night, people will still call him in the english way. It would be a pointless debate. Out of respect, unless said otherwise by the person, I always think that pronouning in its native language is the polite way. Of course, in practice I don't always get to do that, sometimes I'm not even aware that it's in a different language, but I do think that's the most polite way, most showing of respect. I would go out of my way to learn and use this "origninal" pronunciation for people like Linus (well, it's easy here anyway, no real effort required) or, to give another easy example, for Michael Schumacher. While here, it's also a sign of respect (some would even call that normal decency) to use the diacritics where required.
    5
  277. I don't get your last complaint. A LOT, really A LOT of people, more normie ones, complain when switching to Firefox that it doesn't have the conveniences of Chrome. Exactly like that Sync Service. WHAT THE FLYING F is stopping you on not using it ? It's not for you, it's for the normies. If you were in their shoes, you'd realize how immensily annoying a comment like yours is. It's literally being damned if you do, damned if you don't.
    5
  278.  @marcogenovesi8570  "is Unix phylosophy against dependency now? Does your scripts work without all the grep/awk/count/sort/whatever? " I think you didn't understand the Unix philosophy. At least from your example which is terrible. A script that you write is meant to use the very unix-like-in-philosophy programs, because *they are to be used for composition*. That is the sole reason of "only" doing one thing and do it well, so it can be brought up and be used in other scripts/programs with as little unneeded stuff as possible. Does grep use awk/count/sort ? Does awk use grep/count/sort ? Does sort use grep or awk ? Do you understand the difference now ? Back to the topic at hand... have you even bothered to read the thread ? Just two replies above and 3 hours before you posted your first post, Hanabishi wrote: "can I use systemd as ONLY the init binary and throw out the entire rest of it? You can, technically. It is complicated, but much easier for servers though. You can get rid of logind because "systemd services are not sessions, they run outside of logind". So you can run for example sshd instead of logind. Journald also can be disabled (you will not have a replacement for logs of course, but kernel dmesg works though)." Even somebody new to the topic should see that systemd clearly isn't so unix-like some would believe. Having 70 binaries is not enough to say they follow the unix philosophy. Please, do check on your favourite search engine ""Systemd: The Biggest Fallacies" on "Jude's Blog.". It will take 15-20 minutes. This discussion will be much more productive after that.
    5
  279. This comparison, while appearing funny, is completely wrong. X is solid state does not specify any quantity, any %. It simply implies that it's more than 0%. "Our new cola is arsenic free" has the "free" in it, which PRECISELY quantifies the arsenic as 0%. In other words the example is wrong and misleading and totally not comparable with the topic of the video.
    5
  280. Looked fine ? It's outrageous!
    5
  281. Btw, just to confirm, saying something is supported in ALL major browsers, with exceptions, is a total waste. Of time, space, everything. I want my 5 seconds back, dammit!
    5
  282. Or maybe the customers should stop calling. If only one customer calls per day, he'll only have to take a dump once a day, problem solved! It's always the customers who are to blame.
    5
  283. It's a quick look, not a review. And not giving a reason or at least something else to do instead is the definition of waste of time and space. Give me my 5 seconds back!
    5
  284. Log files too, sometimes. When you want to have retention for days to years (and not use something like ELK), the previous days/hours are usually gzipped so they take less space, but they're kept as individual files.
    5
  285. Besides the point made above, it's also that in some cases there's not much funding and such there's not enough effort/time/money/people going into UI Design. Just simple functional.
    5
  286.  @andreas.111  It got that years ago
    5
  287. So where are the big boobs ?
    4
  288.  @donaldwilliamfry  If God truly is real, he better show up and do something, actual helping and also proving he exists. Because all the people on the Earth are doing a horrible job of speaking in his name. Until that happens, there's a lot of us who'd rather not believe nonsensical fairy tales and take responsability for what they do. And also do good just for the sake of doing good, not from fearing of being boiled alive for eternity, or at the promise of everything you could ever wish in the next life. So, please, keep your religion to yourself, and stop wasting other people's time with that nonsense, when the topic at hand has nothing with religion.
    4
  289.  @BrodieRobertson  I think it's the part at the end about shining light on the issue without insults (like the french invasion). And I'm on the same page. Reddit and YouTube are meant for drama, let us have our fun poking at the issue. Those targeted shouldn't take everything to heart. Of course on places like github, things should be proffessional and on point.
    4
  290. I take when we have things that have specific words with specific meanings and those get ignored. Case in point, having EXPERIMENTAL code. What more do you need to be told to not use this in production, and if you do, do it at your own risk ? Experimental code is so you know what's coming, to be able to work with it and test it, not ship it to production. To the folks saying that "well, they shipped it, so it's their responsability", I disagree, at least on this particular case. Nginx is opensource and you can compile nginx without http3 (omit --with-http_v3_module), so you can have it without experimental code at all. You can have it removed (not just disabled) at a binary level. So you can be VERY EASILY shielded from "oh, someone just flipped a flag, by mistake or intent". Also, F5's point was that they know people/projects/companies that USE it, not that they simply might have it in the binary. I understand F5's position here, and I can't really blame them that much, but I do think it's just bad practice and it incentivises bad practice in general, and should be avoided. So I'd be happier if they didn't go the CVE route, but using other means of communication.
    4
  291. Bullshit! The 3 year part. It stayed as a level 2 since... forever and you're claiming it will suddenly jump to level 5 in 3 years ? GET OUTTA HERE!
    4
  292. This depends a lot on the hardware you have. For desktops and laptops Linux is still behind in hardware support (especially peripherals) because the companies making them didn't bother to write drivers for Linux, and OF COURSE that they don't opensource the ones on Windows or offer schematics or documentation of sorts. Also, even for Windows, the stability of the system is again, determined by hardware. And user behaviour. I'm not now writing this from my almost 7 year old laptop that I've used DAILY for both work and personal use (aka A LOT). It still has the original Windows 10 install, except that at one point I upgraded to the Pro version to get rid of those F^#^&$#ING automatic updates (best $11 spent ever). In almost 7 years I had 4 (four) blue screens of death. And after I configured it so it updates when I say so, not when it wants, I can get to really high uptimes (I usually try to be between 1 and 2 months, but the biggest I got was exactly 100 days. It still ran fine, but I went immediately to update it, to not risk being the idiot who got hit by a ransomware) Still, if you get a new laptop or premade desktop, you can check System76 or Tuxedo or Framework to get one that's guaranteed to work flawlessly with Linux. And even without that, Linux is evolving fast, so your experience from 1 year ago can be drastically improved. It's still not guaranteed. But in, say, at most 5 years, I think that more than 99% of people would be perfectly served by Linux. By then Wayland and HDR will be mainstream and mature, the GPU drivers will be perfect for all 3 vendors, the anti-cheat systems in games should no longer be a problem, all except the most obscure games should be playable, everything except Adobe software should also work with no hassle and drivers for over 99% of components and peripherals should be available.
    4
  293. Because they're using it, they know what doesn't work, and it's also something that, because they interact with it on a daily basis, it's very annoying ? Seems overwhelmingly obvious to me.
    4
  294. Hey DT! Wouldn't it better if most of those distros that some call them pointless, to be simply customizing scripts, to be ran after the base distro installation ? Wouldn't that achieve mostly the same thing, except it will be simpler for... everyone ?
    4
  295.  @waveformdistortion  The Sony Xperia 4, if I remember correctly, doesn't let you install benchmarking tools. And it so happens that it overheats like crazy (not helped by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 non plus, but still, they did an awful job at cooling it or at least limiting its power a bit). When I heard that, I immediately lost interest in any Sony phone. How can they be so petty ?
    4
  296.  @SisypheanRoller  Damn it, if my net wouldn't had dropped at the exact time, I would've posted this hours ago and the many replies that I see now would've been ... better. So, regarding the monolithic part - the number of binaries is indeed not relevant (though often easy to tell at a glance). The idea is the coupling. If you have one giant binary or one main binary and another 10 binaries, but there is a hard dependency to them (or just one of them) then you have a monolithic program. In our case (unless it has changed recently, I haven't checked) journald is a prime example. It is a component of systemd that cannot be (safely) removed or changed. It is a separate binary from systemd but because of the hard coupling, it effectively is part of systemd. To systemd's credit, the amount of binaries that have stable APIs and that can be changed with 3rd party binaries safely has increased over the years. One can hope that eventually that will be the case for all of them and that everyone will then be able to use as much of systemd as it needs and replace anything that they don't like. Getting back to the UNIX philosophy of "do one thing and do it well" unfortunately many many people don't understand it and spew bullsh!t that it's outdated or other such nonsense. The idea of it is that such programs (tools or in a broader sense, infrastructure) should do one thing and do it well in order to have effective interoperability. In order to have that program be able to be easily and effectively used for scripts or other programs. Since you mentioned, the "one thing" is not important. It can be any thing as long as a) is complete enough that in most cases can be used alone and b) is small enough that you don't have to disable a lot of it for normal cases or that by simply running it the CPU/memory requirements are significantly higher than what is actually needed in the typical use case. This can be as simple as listing the contents of a directory (ls) or transcoding video and audio streams with many options of editing and exporting (ffmpeg). Is ffmpeg massively complex ? Yes! Do people complain that it violates the UNIX philosophy ? Not to my knowledge. Why ? You can use it effectively with the rest of the system, you can script around it. And it works well. OBS using it under the hood is a testament of that too. Lastly, here's a practical example of why not following the UNIX philosophy is bad, which hopefully also responses to Great Cait's question of why the hate: Search CVE-2018-16865 . It's a vulnerability that was found on journald several years ago, and was later fixed. The problem is that it's pretty high severity. And... you cannot simply disable or remove journald (or couldn't at that time). You can use rsyslog alongside journald, but because they made it to be soo coupled, you cannot literally remove it and still have a working system. Imagine the stress levels for system administrators that found out that they have a big security risk that they cannot disable/remove/replace, they just have to wait for an update. That's the hate. Yeah, it works pretty good. But it's not perfect. And it's being shoved down our throats in a "take it all or leave it" manner that is a slippery slope for potential big problems down the line when everyone is using it and suddenly some massive vulnerability hits it or Red Hat pushes something on it that everybody hates or things like that. And people will suddenly realize that "oh, sheet, what do we do now, we have no alternative, we cannot change 70 programs overnight". And it's annoying, because we know to do better. Hopefully it can change to be fully modular and non monolithic so something like what I wrote above cannot happen.
    4
  297. A lot of past time events have echoes that can be seen even today. That's not enough
    4
  298. You have no idea what you're talking about. An embodiment of "Linux does not have the right culture".
    4
  299. You can, I think, I hope, also try to push back against such nonsense. I'm sure that Linux Mint has a TON of users that are actually sane. If they receive a massive pushback, maybe this can be corrected and Linux Mint can remain as a a good option to have.
    4
  300.  @maxcontreras.  Interesting, thanks for the info! And cheers! Your english is very good, I didn't had any problems. Granted I'm not a native speaker either, I'm from Romania.
    4
  301. By saying "dwarf planet size" do you refer to systemd as a whole, the full(ish) suite of executables ? I don't think it's the case here, at least, clearly, not all. From what I know, systemd did made efforts in the last years to be less monolithic, to actually embrace somewhat the unix philosophy. I hope that journald at least is replaceable now. And I don't say that because I'm an apologist or a fan, I still hate systemd and Lennard P. And I use Gentoo with openRC and I'll check sys6 when I'll have a bit more time or on the new laptop.
    4
  302. Here's your bro with the real life tips
    4
  303. @cateatingbread Well, support from Windows 10 expiring might give a push to more people.
    4
  304. Whaaat ? And running trains with diesel ? Battery ? Sideways electric lines ?
    4
  305.  @Lauren88O8  Sooo about 69c per egg. Not nice, indeed! Hope that normal times come back sooner rather than later.
    4
  306. Money laundering.
    4
  307. It's an artix very focused to run well on old hardware. This includes being based on debian, so there's little chances of updates breaking stuff. And you don't really need to update that much and often on a 15 year old machine.
    4
  308. A package got an update, quick, rebuild the whole system! Seriously though, the thought that you can nuke your ZFS ... that's nightmare fuel!
    4
  309. IIRC GIMP 3 has a lot of color space improvements if not an overhaul. And it's one of the main blockers for Adobe people in using it, from what I've heard.
    4
  310. Is she better than DotA Lina ? They're both doing magic!
    4
  311. Depends on the game. My GTX 1060 (laptop version) surely won't have any problems in Half-Life 2 :D
    4
  312. animated wepb ? You mean webm ?
    4
  313. Does that mean that all compilations were single threaded ? And if that is true, does that mean that all compilations would've been 4-6 times as fast as they were ? 20 minutes grub install ?
    4
  314. Except that in the end it was shown that it was not the schedulers but the file system used.
    4
  315.  @janami-dharmam  Yeah, he switched silver and copper when listing the melting points. I think it was just a simple mistake.
    4
  316. LoL
    4
  317. A few of these are only differences, with Windows not being truly inferior. For example: the backslash. You can use forward slash too (at least in the modern windowses. Maybe in Windows 95 it wouldn't've worked) The case insensitive files.... that might actually by a bonus for a normie user. Lastly, the activation in order to customize... that's understandable. Activating is only using a key, no names required. And since it's not free (for now) it makes sense to have some kind of locked features. And visual customization have 0 impact on actual important things, like drivers and applications. It's not awesome, but I cannot truly fault them for that.
    4
  318. Even more insane was that he actually passed the scores without the thermal paste! He could've won even without that!
    4
  319. Who's this Ed and what have you done with Low Level Learning ?
    4
  320. True, but the successor should frankly rise itself to that name, not have to be specifically chosen by Stallman. And, sadly, I can't think of anyone being so outspoken and uncompromising, while still very clear in the vision and goal as Richard is. Though to be fair I'm not THAT involved to know that many people in this, maybe they are and simply had a low profile, I don't know.
    4
  321. Gr8 b8 m8, I r8 8/8
    4
  322. Theo: Check out Sam! Me: Sam who ? Theo: Yeah!
    4
  323.  @BuggiEU  Because that's normal ? I mean, normal it is for the reviews to come a bit before the launch. The launch means they are up for selling. Isn't it normal to have reviews so people know if it's worth buying ?
    4
  324. 100% agree
    4
  325.  @famousmwofficial8046  The thing is that it used to cater. That's why there's still looming expectation it will do so. I guess they didn't put a bright flashing light "Starting from this version, we don't care anymore" or something like that.
    4
  326. He already did Haiku and also ReactOS. Don't know about the others
    4
  327.  @KookoCraft  I think you are kind of confusing the terms. It's called a patch, but it's akin to a plugin, module or DLC in gaming terms. And the idea is that it's easier to add than to remove. So barebones base + pick and choose your features via patches. All in source code so they're compiled and have no runtime overhead. Yeah, it's not streamlined enough, you don't have a one-click or one-command install that will also bring all the patches, so I get that it can get to be tedious and a bit annoying for some. But it's not THAT bad. And it has its reasons.
    4
  328. Did you just say that C is slower than Java nowadays ?
    4
  329. Another problem with the way apt lists the packages that are going to be installed/removed/updated is that someone new will have no idea what they do. The biggest offender, I think, is xorg. Who is new to linux (ok, GNU/Linux) would have the slightest idea how important xorg is and what it does ? The name itself is as generic as possible, it can be literally about anything. So even if it was somebody reading the wall of text, it might still believe that it's just sudo or apt being a bit overzealous. It would be nice if all Linux installers and settings had a page somewhere were it would list all important components of the sistem, to better (easier?) educate people. A list like: - bootloader: grub - init sistem: open rc - display manager (or whatever it is): X.org - desktop environment: gnome - theme: whatever - default shell: alacritty - default package manager: apt While to a new user these won't tell anything about what they do and how they work, it will allow them to get a bit familiar with them. And if they hop to another distro, they might realize where the differences come from, so later they will more easily get to conclusions about what they like.
    4
  330.  @insu_na  Always annoying when people can't even read headlines. Always in such a hurry, which is ironic, that when taking the time to RTFM (which isn't even the manual, just a slightly longer instruction list) and installing it without problems, it's faster than going fast and breaking it and then spending time to troubleshoot it.
    4
  331. While I support the idea, I don't think it relates to e-waste anymore. 32bit systems are, by now, so old that they're basically unusable as a normal computer. If you value your time, that is. So I think that 32 bit systems are mostly just for niche segments now, enthusiasts and geeks having them for retro purposes. And, frankly, they could all simply still use Debian 11, that's why I say the e-waste is a non argument in this case, these systems are not being thrown away anyway, Debian 12 support or not. And the machines that would be e-waste without proper software support are 64 bit by now. Still, like I said, I really like the 32 bit support and backwards support in general. Maybe you want to simply have a partition with 32bit OS+apps that you can run "natively" so to speak, while your main OS can stay 64 bit.
    4
  332. @carnigoth This massive radicalisation that's happening in USA is part of the problem. You shouldn't each and everyone of you go to the extreme over things like these. The reality is that both parties have gigantic problems and you, the normal people, should relearn to get along. That will be productive on the long term. And it will start by not getting angry at the people from the other side, even when they're wrong. It won't be easy, but a deescalation is so very much needed.
    4
  333. So now we can have malware and spyware in Linux too ? I'm thinking of those DRMs that totally destroy the performance or the totally-not-a-spyware-and-a-rootkitofsorts anti-cheat that Valorant (IIRC) has.
    4
  334. Like others said, I think at the first sign of trouble or good opportunity, Trump will kick Elon out like it's a flea. I got to say, it's weirdly satisfying seeing how Trump's got Elon under his boot. The old geezer still has tricks up his sleeve. Though overall, I fear it will only bring a massive amount of problems, globally and for USA. I do hope I'll be proven wrong on this.
    4
  335.  @freecycling6687  Oh man, what an excellent idea of a bet! Who would come first ? :))
    4
  336.  @thelasthallow  The launch itself is progress, though wildly expensive, but hey, it happens. But the detonation... I mean come on... totally not the reason to cheer. I mean, not even a shocked "oooh" or something like that, then follow up with "well, it launched, yaay" and only THEN cheer. It reeked of brainwashed people.
    4
  337. In the stream from which this video is made, Theo said that Firefox is a bad browser, but Safari is a toy, not an actual browser. So, yeah, even harder to love.
    4
  338. Somebody has to first put a light on this nonsense so somebody else (hopefully many) can fight this nonsense. Tech is dying because of these lunatics.
    4
  339.  @SirLightfire  From their marketing material, when you searched for something, it showed you one or more images too. So I think they store the screenshots too. That would explain why it needs so much space too (IIRC about 25 GB per month). I mean it's not something gigantic, but if it's just the metadata of what you did, it would be, what 2 MB per day, so 100 MB / month ?
    4
  340. Isn't that overkill to do it in bash ? Seems way to complicated for that, to me.
    4
  341. I have two questions. Forgive me if they are extremely stupid. 1) Can you minimize a window in dwm ? And in WMs in general ? (when using just them, without a DE). I'm asking because I'm actually keeping a lot of programs open usually (currently still in Windows), like several terminals, notepad++, 2-3 browsers (and FFX and Chrome usually have 2+ windows opened too), PHPStorm, Skype, Teams, File manager(s) and task manager. And some I don't REALLY need to keep them open at all times, but I do like the instant switch. 2) Can you install and run something like Firefox without a DE and a WM ? I assume that yes, you can, provided you have a ... graphical system (??) like X ? I might confusing a lot of stuff here. I'm just curious what is exactly needed for what.
    4
  342. @thunder kus It won't take weeks. I don't know why Thunderf00t even mentioned how long it will take to charge using your standard home outlets, that's just stupid and a waste of time to think about and mention. Realistically, they will be mostly be charged overnight, when the driver sleeps. The most basic supercharger can get that done. Also, if those 1MW Semi chargers get to be a reality and actually not be very rare, they should also help a lot. Like you take a mandatory 30 minute break mid day, in that time you could charge 50% of the battery. So it's feaseable to reach 800 miles per day of driving. Really, if Elon Musk wouldn't have marketed insanely stupid things, people could see that in some cases this is a decent truck. For low-weight high volume short-to-medium hauls it's definitely usable.
    4
  343.  @GeoEstes  It's shown in the video that the revenues are among the biggest they ever had... where did you got that -1/3 ??
    4
  344. I don't know, it mentioned there raspberry pi zero, that's quite barebones with no GPU to speak of. I think it's mostly for those cases, not desktop users with modern CPUs (like Zen 2 or Intel 10th gen or better)
    4
  345.  @ern0plus4  If I'm not mistaken, this also allows for dynamic code and also self modifying code. That, at times (rarely done today) can allow some tight-in-memory programs.
    4
  346. True. Still, better late than never.
    4
  347. Yes and no. The idea is that if it isn't popular, the legitimate reasons are only mild annoyances. You can usually get around by easily (like using something else). But when it gets popular, you kind of feel surrounded by it. It's no longer so easy to circumvent it. It's also easier to get annoyed that something bad is no longer just something in a corner, but it's spreading like a plague. So the popularity part makes you from simply not liking it to hate it. With a passion. DIE SYSTEMD!
    4
  348. Y. U. Bald Homie, where art thou ?
    4
  349. If you keep to the latest version, don't you also risk getting the latest backdoor that might've been put there intentionally by somebody who hacked some accounts or servers where i2p is stored ?
    4
  350. Fortunately, the error had the decency to be quite harmless, so don't stress about it. Cheers!
    4
  351. I don't think that Notepad++ devs are hypocritical in the slightest. Few things to consider: - are they owned by Microsoft ? No - do they have contracts with Microsoft ? Pretty certain they don't - Notepad++ is 17 years old software that's very praised for it's usefulness on Windows. If Microsoft does NOW something bad, what would the devs that worked 17 years on this project supposed to do ? Close the project now ? Ok, it can be argued that this isn't the first shady thing that Microsoft does, but you get the idea So, considering the above, I think that the devs publicly distancing themselves to what Microsoft did is exactly the thing they should've done. Though I can also argue about not mixing products with ideology. I mean, raise your individual fork at Microsoft, but leave the Notepad++ project completely untouched. But getting back, I don't think they're hypocritical. You can certainly stay in a man's backyard but still fight them over things you don't approve. You don't have to immediately leave. If the differences are many, clear and insurmountable, THEN you'll have to eventually leave.
    4
  352.  @Unethical.Dodgson  Don't kid yourself, he's not stupid. He always knows what to say to the public, be it normal people, investors or government officials/agencies so that they take his BS for granted. Nobody is even close to getting this far on this amount of BS. You can try your best to talk some people into an idea that's only 1/10 the amount of BS he does on a regular basis, and you'll get laughed out of the room and have nobody backing you up or giving you money. That's where his "genius" is.
    4
  353. Very well said!
    4
  354. DoS, not DDoS! There's nothing distributed here!
    4
  355.  @jaredsmith5826  Well, getting more serious now, it actually improved a lot. Since PHP 7.0 (now we're at version 8.1), I'd say it's a decent language. Much more static typing, less bugs, less exotic behaviours and hidden errors because 0.1% might want that feature, and general modern features. It has pretty regular releases, though it also followed the extremely annoying and stupid trend of only supporting a version for a couple of years, but other than that, it's going well. There's still some of that haystack, needle and needle, haystack nonsense, because backwards compatibility (ugly or not, there's millions of websites written in PHP, so backwards compatibility is very important). I like it as a language because you can easily grow with it. You can start by simply having a really simple program with several functions and ifs and fors, fully procedural. And you can expand easily and at your own pace towards fully featured OOP style, with namespaces, interfaces and traits, with autoloading. You get the idea.
    4
  356. It's still better than actual no backup. But, yeah...
    4
  357. You cannot deprecate something when you lack an alternative. Once Wayland is mature enough, the deprecation will surely begin.
    4
  358. I second that!
    4
  359. There is a video here on youtube with a madman who installed the latest Gentoo at that time on a 486, in 2018. And another video from this year, if I remember correctly, installing ... Gentoo (of course it's Gentoo) on a Pentium 133 MHz. And yeah, they boot really slow 5-10 minutes to boot, another 5 minutes just to shut down. Though you can actually connect to the internet and see or download stuff safely. But overall, there's little reason to install a modern kernel. Though, regarding the speed, the one on the Pentium doesn't seem like he went full optimisation, so it actually might run much better. I'm with Linus too here. Part of me hates to see support like this dropping, but in reality, it keeps the code more maintainable, without an everlasting list of things to check or maintain compatible. And the devices who get to be dropped support truly are obsolete and also don't really benefit from having the latest kernel. Now please excuse me while I stash a nice whiskey bottle for 2032 when 586 support will be dropped.
    4
  360. Couldn't agree more!
    3
  361. Hey Louis, thanks and congrats for all the work you do, especially this thing: contributing for a common sense law to be passed, aka working for a better world. Now, I feel the need to express some things: 1) Even though things like the right to repair don't have much sense to be something to be taken into account just on a local scale, I do feel that the senator is entitled to ask anyone from where it is, even if it sounds totally dumb. For all they care maybe the people from Nebraska actually don't want this law, but somehow a lot of people from other states come to plead for it. Surely there can be nebraskians found to come and plead so this is no longer an issue. 1.a) When the senator had nothing to good to say about that satisfied customer from Nebraska... I see that as perfectly normal. He is not there to congratulate anybody. It's normal, given the time constraints, to only ask/talk only about the things that he doesn't like/know etc. I'd say, if all he had to say/point was a stupid argument, then all for the better, as that seems that everything else was ok, and that stupid argument can be cleared with ease. 2) In general I think that in order for a law to be passed, or at least for it to pass further, after this kind of talk (I don't know exactly how it works in US, I'm from Romania), the senators DO have to ensure that all aspects are taken into account. You can think of them to be the devil's advocate. However a dumb question might be asked, you guys should be prepared to answer it so the thing you're pleading for is without a benefit of a doubt good/better for all people, especially law and politics people. Think of them being like "ok, so you want this law that seems pretty common sense. But, you know there's big companies (or anyone else for that matter) that might not want that, and we're not technical enough to call bullshit on their part. How will you tackle this?" Aka is your job to provide as much evidence as possible that this will have no secondary effects or unforseen situations or abusable situations or affect unrelated parties etc. And that the things affected are with a reason (repair right will lower Apple's income, but will provide the consumer their right of ownership over the bought part or their human right dunno). It does sound a little like you'll have to do their work, but ... such is life. 3) As AkolythArathok said in this comment section, there needs to be a more serious pose. Talking about Repair Family is kind of distracting from the point aswell. Or things like "hey I have here a customer which is so happy, yay!". You actually did her job here with very clearly and shortly/on point saying "we do data recovery for which the customer has no option to do at the manufacturer, for any amount of money". That is how I think a point should be made. All in all, it was kind of sad, but totally not surprising to see this. And I have to congratulate for your speech. It was very on point, with clear arguments and examples. Now all you have to do for next year is to have everybody supporting this be as efficient and articulate as you :) And have everybody be able to totally demolish all (dumb) counterarguments presented here. And as you very well observed, to have this lobbying prior to the talk. The talk is just a showcase.
    3
  362.  @BrodieRobertson  Wait, didn't Brave said they're going to continue the support of v2 ? Even if Chromium removes it ?
    3
  363.  @DistroTube  If I'm not mistaken, because you liked it, he cannot edit his comment anymore (which makes sense if you think about it)
    3
  364. Yet somehow their revenue increased substantially in the last couple of years
    3
  365.  @SimonVaIe  True. That's why I said it's difficult to say. Thing is, for HEDT, they had "Broadwell-E" with 6950X as their top-of-the line CPU, in 2016 (when Kaby Lake was on desktop), with 10 cores. They were just then developing these things, on the new 14nm node, which also had a bumpy start. From this, I'd say that they brought the mainstream 6 core about as early I'd you expect. Most likely they might've delayed them a bit if Ryzen wouldn've appeared.
    3
  366. I was thinking the same thing. I mean, in order to be truly worth it, it needs to have some major performance advantages. And some of that might be from processor-specific... things.
    3
  367. Already ? I think I've had it for more than a year.
    3
  368. Same. And I can't nag the feeling that some of these are actual scams. Though for certain some are real. I guess that now, when we're already bottlenecked by the Lithium production, the current batteries price will increase to insane levels, which should allow the other types that haven't reached the economies of scale to finally surface in the consumer market. But I still don't know if it will be this year or in 5 years. The hype always hides or kills good estimations on this regard.
    3
  369. That's not the point of the video ... ??
    3
  370.  @thelasthallow  It's biased heavely in favour of science. Sorry that it makes you so salty about it, real people care about the real world, not about the fantasies of a con man.
    3
  371. I think it's a combination of the two. They love it for some features and hate it for some others. And in the end they love the nice things more than they hate the bad things. And they probably also hope/expect that the bad things will get solved (which, eventually, I'm sure they will, at least the things fixable by software updates. The hardware ones will get fixed too, but in future revisions of the car)
    3
  372. Not even that forsaken LA loop which is just cars with drivers in tunnels (totally not profound) didn't got self driving, and that's basically perfect conditions, short route (read: not so complex) with almost everything controlled. On a side note, I still can't believe that FSD is not illegal to be used as a term for Level 2 assisted driving when the term "full self driving" matches the Level 5 one. That clearly says a lot about the society too, which enabled these high-level charlatans. It's like me selling Immortal pills, making you feel like no disease, condition, wound or age can affect you. While technically I'm selling 200mg ibuprofen pills, clearly labeled as such on the wall of text that is the technical details sheet. How insane would that be ?
    3
  373.  @spuriouseffect  Sorry, you keep confusing government or state owned with beaurocracy. And think that private = beaurocracy free. Which is totally wrong. They are very different things. At a very basic level, having beaurocracy is having written papers about rules and agreements. Any kind of contract, if it's written - BAM there you go, beaurocracy. Does your fancy Sweden have nothing but verbal agreements between all the companies ? I seriously doubt it. Beaurocracy is often seen as negative when it's done inefficient, which is very easy to do. The goal of beaurocracy is to have everything stated and noted, so everything can be tracked and everybody can know and check the current or past rules and agreements & their states at a given time. With a well-constructed beaurocracy, nobody can say "I don't know what I have to do, what are my responsabilities" or "I don't know if I'm allowed to do that" or "I don't know who made that or took that decision" and so on. Having that idea in mind, simple people think then that everything have to be written and whenever something new comes, one or more rules are created, without having regard of the existing rules and the need to have the shortest, most efficient list of rules. Cases where beaurocracy foster corruption and nepotism are cases where people are using or actively trying to create a very heavy beaurocracy, where it's impossible to track all the things so they can benefit from that. But that's not the idea of beaurocracy that's wrong, that's the fault of the people who created or let the system get into that state. It's like saying that houses are useless - they break all the time, you need a lot of time and money for all the repairs, in winter you're cold, in summer you're sweating buckets, insects can fly inside, the walls get moldy etc etc, so you conclude that houses suck, and everybody should move into caves. Well, that's not the idea of having a house that's to blame here, it's how that house in particular what was wrong - it should have been built better.
    3
  374. @TheFridayCheckout Intel ANNOUNCED not released. Sorry to shout, it triggered me greatly, such a basic mistake.
    3
  375. Truly off-topic, but I just have to comment: seeing 2724 comments (which, sadly, means it's impossible to read even half of them) and then seeing that the video has only 76390 (yes, 76 thousand) views... This amount of engament surely is among the top. Of course, being something known and that makes you angry help greatly (there's studies that show that online people react the most to things that anger you. Which perpetually fuels click bait, polarisation, echo chambers and such. Oh well). Anyway, really stunned at the comments to views ratio. Outstanding! I think that Mr. Barnatt can put this to his resume. Cheers!
    3
  376. On the Zen5 rumor, another serial leaker (which, while I don't always agree with what he says, his leaks are pretty solid) - the YT channel "Moore's Law is Dead" specifically said that it's NOT 40% and that everybody is wrong on that. To his sources, it's 16-24% IPC increase, and the clock speeds seem to be mostly similar. And I firmly believe him on this one. 40% increase is either a) very cherry picked, b) totally wrong or c) gigantic, almost unseen, gen-to-gen improvement. The last time that has happened is from Buldozer to Zen 1, which was also 4 years, not just 2. And it was from a rather bad architecture to begin with, while here the "previous gen" is already very good and advanced on all fronts. To put it shortly 40% my @$$
    3
  377.  @SpaceBanana  What the hell is wrong with y'all calling an OS an "operative system". It's "operating system" wtf.
    3
  378. Well, unfortunately, some games are console exclusives :( So, you might have a console for them, not because you don't want to spend on a good PC. Hopefuly, indirectly, this will mean better PC ports :D
    3
  379. I second this. When did firefox or its CEO supported censorship ? I know they got a bit too woke for their own good (or for my taste). I really hope something changes there and firefox rises back from its ashes. I don't want it to die :(
    3
  380. Repeat after me: Rhai - phy - zen
    3
  381. JPG is lossy even at 100 quality.
    3
  382. I've never seen this explicitly stated - if the Steam Client is out of support, even if you stay offline, you won't be able to run the games that you already have installed ? At worst, I guess you can do this by staying permanently offline and adjusting your clock to be like in 2019 or something
    3
  383.  @chrisr7597  Classic Christopher is nice, but how would Quantum Christopher sound ?
    3
  384. From outside, that's a reasonable take to have. If you dig deeper, it seems to be highly unlikely. Most of the people covering the story didn't even mention that the guy was from Microsoft.
    3
  385. Yeah... no. The conversation would be very short. Both Brian and Linus would mostly agree and that would be it. Barely any debate at all.
    3
  386.  @dio4296  If the joke uses a reference that some simply don't know about, it's not that bad to explain it. So... is this the case ? I didn't understand the joke either. Should a read/watch something so I can click ?
    3
  387.  @maxcontreras.  Ha, correct, I am missing on those. I simply didn't had them in memory when I wrote it, and it's not something I had to dabble in recently. From your list, I know about all, except loc OS. Is that a capital i or a lowercase L ? Never heard of that one. I'll check it out.
    3
  388.  @larryczerwonka5125  huh ? What I said is to physically reload the page. Like visiting another page. It's the most basic thing, it works perfectly on ALL browsers and ALL devices and screens.
    3
  389. It's been like that for many years already. It focuses and comments more on the future and the trends, not that much on particular stuff that's currently not working. It did that in the first editions, but it got boring and repetitive (for him) fast (every single year to mention how bad games are on Linux, for example), so he shifted on more of a meta analysis. While I wouldn't say no to have an actual list, roundup of all the things still missing or being broken in Linux, I appreciate this culture and trend analysis more, since it's less easy to observe and realize the current state or the near to medium term risks. He is usually a bit more pessimistic in his views, but, in a way, he's contributing to those things not having a change to turn into reality, by outraging people who in turn do something about it, before it's too late.
    3
  390. Very nice list!
    3
  391. Hey DT! Do you know that when you have a floating selection (like after pasting) you can press the new layer button at the bottom of the layer window and it will merge the floating selection into a new layer. Personally I only use this all the time and I merge or whatever the new layer into another one instead of anchoring the floating selection. I honestly don't really understand the need of a floating layer. It confuses new people greatly. Sorry, not greatly, but MASSIVELY. Why wouldn't the Paste command simply create a new layer is beyond me. Aaanyway, at the end, the cut and paste of the layers wasn't needed. There's a tool to move layers (the icon is a 4-direction arrow). By holding Shift and dragging, it will move the active layer. Without Shift, it will try to guess the layer you want to move based on where you started dragging. There's other options too. Hope these little tricks helped. Cheers!
    3
  392.  @SeralyneYT  But... on the internet, including the FOSS community, can't you simply be just a name ? Like what you are here on YouTube ? With that you can be anything you want in real life and noone would know, and most importantly, noone should care. And by that metric, it would be fully inclusive.
    3
  393. I was wondering too, glad I'm not the only one. One Wikipedia search later, quote: "A breast pump is a mechanical device that lactating women use to extract milk from their breasts. They may be manual devices powered by hand or foot movements or automatic devices powered by electricity."' Oh well...
    3
  394.  @gagenater  Ok, so at least there's that.
    3
  395.  @iamjacobnz  Depends. The NVidia product might not age well, while the Framework desktop will still be a very good desktop chip for everyday use and work (that doesn't need very powerful graphics).
    3
  396. Eric Murphy here on YouTube did a VERY GOOD video on that just several days ago. It has recent, real world examples of what happens when you don't have privacy. I cannot recommend it enough.
    3
  397.  @orlfman  It's true, though NVidia started to open source their drivers, though only the ones for RTX 3000 or 2000 onwards. If they truly continue that path, he might be enjoying good, open source drivers for his 3070 Ti. Though it's been a bit silent on that front, I wouldn't bet on it happening. But can certainly hope so.
    3
  398.  @BrodieRobertson  I wanted to mention this as well. When a computer starts, the transistors have to be put in "work mode". This work mode is actually something similar to overloaded mode. That is, you first have to put a lot of power into them to get there. Unfortunately, I don't have a better explanation. However, it is true, that having a lot of power cycles will degrate your components, mostly the capacitors, I think. Once per day is certainly ok, you should get 10 years of life even with crappy hardware.
    3
  399. Yeah, I'm in the same camp. I like (liked?) JS as a language, and realized I don't like any frameworks. Though, to be honest, I haven't used one in years, since I'm a backend dev. jQuery was/is the only well built, well designed piece of JS. And it's what it should be - just a library, not a framework. I'm still baffled that some simple websites go to the hassle of having Angular or Vue or React. If you have A LOT of reactive (is this the word ?) elements, then, maybe. Something like a facebook page, I guess would be quite the work with only jQuery. But maan, there's a lot of websites that are over engineered with these modern JS frameworks.
    3
  400.  @mrmoinn  True, for loops usually have 3 declaration parts, separated by semicolons. What I was thinking was more on the test condition. On ifs in particular, sometimes you have multiple expressions there, and a few of them can be quite complicated. And it's no semicolons there.
    3
  401.  @4Leka  Dude, can you stop having EVs up yours so deep ? It's blatantly obvious that running low on fuel is much more of an issue with EVs than with gasoline cars. EVs are awesome but they specifically lack in this department (one of the few). EVs are awesome even with that, there's no need to act dumb and ignore the shortcomings in order to make EVs look better.
    3
  402. I disagree. It's a slippery slope. If everybody would change their defaults (and I'm not speaking lfs or gentoo levels of customizations) then we would only have debian, fedora and arch. The existence of so many distros, many which are simply extra stuff preinstalled over a base distro, means that whatever you ship as the default DOES matter. And I say that it's a slippery slope that after several versions you have to change the default office suite, then the default browser, then the default music editor, then the default package manager and so on.
    3
  403. less elegant ? Can you give some examples ? I specifically like PHP because (and maybe I'm too biased) the syntax it's the best for me, makes the most sense. Not too cryptic, not too verbose, just the right amount of practical and descriptive.
    3
  404.  @NvidiaRTX5080  Where do you see the delta in the 8:10 slide ? "Maximum cell temperature was up to 26% lower" then they say 40° C vs 54° C. This is just wrong. If it would actually have been about delta, then yeah, your point is correct. But it doesn't apply here.
    3
  405. You wanted to ensure they have an equal split, lol.
    3
  406. I think that you're simply a case where it does make sense to have & use a car. There are many cases and Tech Altar acknowledged them. The thing is that these cases are much fewer in number than those that have a car. I mean, many could simply go car-free and they'd have few downsides.
    3
  407.  @K6ORJ  The problem is that it took 15 years. If X wouldn't have been a deadend, Wayland would've NEVER took off.
    3
  408. Our friend, glue! He won't let you down ... because you're glued to the ceiling 😁
    3
  409. Not sure if bot or not. And if it's a bot, not sure if to be scared or proud. What a time to be alive!
    3
  410. He didn't missed the opportunity. It has all those contacts... on the SIM.
    3
  411. That won't be the case. There's a lot of standardisation (and it would be good to have an extra player to keep Google in check with THEIR out-of-spec implementations and websites) nowadays and the browser won't get big if it doesn't follow them. The browser problems of the past that lead to jQuery becoming so mainstream was actually the lack of standards.
    3
  412.  @conorstewart2214  Yeah, I misread a bit, he started to mention things like a Celeron CPU and bargaining power with data centers and I thought he started to check how much it would cost if it would've been self hosted. For the AWS instance, the internet connection is included in those $10, of course.
    3
  413. @UKMonkey About your general elections argument... if you were to compare it to Brexit, then it would mean to have another general elections before the elected person got to be in office. If you elect it again after 4-5 years it is different, since you can say that you tried that option for a reasonable amount of time. In case of Brexit the try part didn't even start yet. Also, if things are so debateable after a vote has been cast but not applied, then you are really diluting the idea&process. In time more and more decisions will be fought against and the general public will care less and less about voting, while those in power will focus more and more on giving reasons of not applying the vote if it wasn't in their favor.
    3
  414.  @BrodieRobertson  Also, I find it disturbing that there's no mention that an elected board member has been outed, but without starting the elections for a new board member. It imbalances the board.
    3
  415.  @Malekthegreat  The problem is with some devs or other higherups insisting to ONLY use ORM. With the attitude that if you don't use it, then you must be that kind of person who only uses unsafe, very messy, manual concatenation of strings to build the queries.
    3
  416. I would, after receiving an extra paycheck equal with the salary for one entire year, on the spot, so I can invest into my job security or a retirement fund. And, of course, a raised paycheck.
    3
  417.  @slay3rgamingyt  Offtopic, but could you please change your stupid, stupid name ? You're wasting everybody's space, for no good reason (that I know of)
    3
  418. I think the original idea was that if the only reason to refactor is because you want to avoid duplication THEN you should think that it should be used in 3 places and only then abstract it. Not that all abstractions should come from using duplications.
    3
  419. Or that they have unknown answers and to which they provide basically no insight at all.
    3
  420. Yeah, I wish someone would do a in depth check on explanation on that. I think a bit of it is bloat, but it's also like you said, having things pre cached so some things are faster. And when you start those other programs, the difference between a minimalistic WM/DE and Gnome shrinks. I just wish someone would demistify that, and we can see the values by ourselves. Still, for the vast majority of normal users, 800-1200 MB of RAM at startup is still plenty fine. It's a bit much, I'd say, only on 4GB or lower systems.
    3
  421.  @jesusisking3814  Hey Spam King! If Jesus actually loves someone, tell him to move his fat ass and contact the person directly, not pass vague and threating message through guillible lunatics like yourself. Of course, assuming that he actually exists and that he has any divine power of any kind and that he actually loves and tries to "save" somebody.
    3
  422. It's about 2 weeks old IIRC.
    3
  423. This was an excellent post, but, please, break it into paragraphs. It's difficult to read midway when it's a wall of text.
    3
  424. I can't wait for a similar analysis on the Aptera car too! Regarding the solar panels, IMO it's mostly an useless gimmick. Ok, if you REALLY like to travel in remote areas (that still have good roads somehow), then, ok, it makes sense. But that's really, really niche. Otherwise, especially since we need so many solar panels globally, to get rid of fossil fuels, any solar panel on a car is at least twice as productive sitting on a roof. Like a roof over a parking, charging the battery that some electric cars can use to recharge while the car is parked and the owner is busy. On a roof it can be 100% in sunlight (except only from clouds) and it can be oriented directly towards the sun. Or close to, if it's static. On a car, at least 1/3 of the panels are not well oriented. Well, come to think of, almost none are properly oriented, though usually most of them are almost decently so.
    3
  425. Hate to sound like the devil's advocate, but Facebook is still a great tool to be in touch with friends and aquentances and to organize events and such. It's just that dumb people started to overuse it, that it got worse and worse. Of course Facebook encouraged that.
    3
  426. What the hell is wrong with jQuery ? In the space of JS libraries and frameworks it is (to me) literally the only one that's well designed. Hence its staying power. Even without any major updates. Ok, I guess that many of its features are now native and most of it is no longer needed, if your website targets modern browsers. Still, I wouldn't say that overall it is obsolete, it still has very nice quality of life features.
    3
  427. So your solution is to have the web paid and basically unavailable for 90% of people. Genious! A grouped subscription is not a bad idea, but it simply doesn't work for all websites and for all people. If not done ostentatively, you'd be surprised how many people are ok with ads. You get to see the site freely, and they get paid by some company trying to be more known. For many that's a win-win.
    3
  428. Copying my answer to another guy with basically the same question: Don't want to be an apologist, but I think the reason is about what he said that a new browser has bigger chances. Because of the baggage. Firefox is 2.88% but on the decline. Linux is 2-3% but growing.
    3
  429. Ah, a man of culture!
    3
  430.  @shiks98  Technically the M chips that Apple has (same idea) are more powerful. The M Ultra chips go 16-channel to a max of 800 GB/s. And have both more CPU and GPU cores. Also technically you don't need "faster" RAM and to spend billion $$ to invent it. The RAM is fast enough, what Intel and AMD are skimping WAAY TOO MUCH is limiting the high-end CPUs to dual channel. Threadripper has 4 and 8 channels. And servers usually have 6 and 8 channels. I know there's 12 channels too. Don't know if there's with more. And guess what, with 4 channels you can go (almost) double the bandwidth of dual channel (and bandwidth is what you need). And I say almost because Threadripper and server chips usually keep the RAM at stock (like 4800-5600 MT/s) speeds/frequencies, while the high end desktops usually go higher on that.
    3
  431. I still can't get over the fact that so many people recommend Fedore to new-to-Linux people.
    3
  432. Free as in "free speech" not "free beer". Meaning, you are FREE to use it as you want.
    3
  433.  @BillAnt  Depends on your needs and wants and financial availability. This is akin to donating to a crowd fund, except that you are actually guaranteed to receive something functional. But in spirit, unless it happens to suit your needs very well, it's a donation. For which, of course, you need to have the extra money and the desire to give them (and, I guess, confidence that they'll actually be used for what you want).
    3
  434. I know it's not hardware, but no mention of Blizzard the anonymous entity that forced GoG to delist Warcraft I and II ? And GoG pledging to still support unlisted games ? While offering a discount for a Warcraft 1 + 2 bundle and a mention to their offline installers. I'm very into game preservation (and right to ownership in general), so I'd wish this story was more widespread, to shame Blizzard and Microsoft for their anti-consumer practices.
    3
  435. Soooo, pardon the question, but what exactly does "ricing" (riceing ? rice-ing?) mean ?
    3
  436.  @terrydaktyllus1320  What a braindead take. Basically "ignore the signs that point to things getting bad about the things you love. Just continue as if nothing is happening, what could go wrong?". And he failed to mention Mozilla. I'd love to hear (well, read) your take on how well Moziila is doing. And before you start that "don't put words into my mouth" BS, let me point you that you wrote "Maybe ignore the politics and just use software that works for you?" which isn't even remotely close to what the OP said. So, if you're so happy to put words into other people's minds, then you don't get to use this as an argument.
    3
  437. I had the same problem too for a while. I thought it's only one of them and I'm just misremembering the name. Then I realized that it's actually 2 different distros. If it helps, ANtix = ANtique, minimal distro for old hardware and ARtix = ARch based minimal distro without systemd
    3
  438. I never thought he is or was insane.
    3
  439.  @galdutro  Ha, interesting, thanks for the reply. I guess that not updating on every single minor new version is a must on Gentoo. Unless you have a "build server" specialized for that, from which you get the binaries, directly.
    3
  440. It outperformed the predictions of westerners saying it will collapse for 2 years now.
    3
  441. No need, we have something better: the subway trains!
    3
  442. For the general public, it's easier to follow like DT did it.
    3
  443.  @latezksi  Sorry if I appear very stupid... how do you do the part >Use multiple line select to efficiently copy and paste The best I can think of would be to have the resulting JSON to be split per line, as many lines as the source, instead of it being a single line. Then you can select the source and paste as a column in the output, three time. Then join the lines back. I guess that's pretty quick, just as fast as Mental Health's solution.
    3
  444.  @FaZekiller-qe3uf  I can reason with it being a 1.0
    3
  445. @briliantlysplendid that's the that Khromno told - NVidia overproduced the 10 series in order to cope with miners. Now that they aren't actually buying them anymore, we're left with old & expensive cards. Well, at least in theory, I don't really have a clue of how much the miners actually impacted GPU stock and prices.
    3
  446. Good point!
    3
  447. On the other hand, at least it won't die from out of memory if you edit a 55 million line file.
    3
  448. I don't know if any other 4 people already told you, but the stutters you mention are most likely "generated" by the game.
    3
  449.  @BrodieRobertson  I expect (read: hope) that with the rise of things like Raspberry Pi 5 being good enough for desktop use (and it surely-many-incoming clones) and also RISC-V getting mainstream, getting hardware with free drivers and firmware (maybe even the hardware itself to be free) might be a thing. Like something that actually works and is easy to use.
    3
  450. Wait, PHP syntax is kind of meh ? How come ? For me, it's the best. There's no language that's easier to look at IMO. I might be too used to it. So, out of curiosity, which language has better syntax ?
    3
  451. Or you know, maybe there's more extensive testing now. I don't think anybody had the proper scale of testing in the first wave.
    3
  452. @MinecrafterPiano - Imbellis- Dude, that's 22% less, or 78% of the cost, not 78% less Edit: I posted a notification about an error and it was fixed :)
    3
  453. Regarding the javascript vs java at the end, can't there simply be a clause that whatever happens to JavaScript™ cannot be used in a case of Java™ not being taken care of ?
    3
  454. The hell are you smoking ? Zelenski cross dressor ? Money launderer ? You say that COMPARING TO ELON ? The absolute, undisputed conman king ? The man that tells you that Full Self Driving will be done next year since LITERALLY 2014 ?
    3
  455. GIMP 3 is garbage, Brodie still has horrible drawings.
    3
  456.  @JoeOvercoat  Elon might've said that about Tesla, but I remember that rather recently (2020 maybe?) he said that about Space-X, so the need that everybody works extra hours go reach some goal/milestone. It was an internal email.
    3
  457. @FluXΦ TAA@1440p has better framerates, but it also looks worse. 4K DLSS (aka 1440p upsampled to 4K) is between 1440p TAA and 4K TAA in both image quality and performance. If it's closer to the 4K in image quality and closer to 1440p in performance then you can call this a win. I'm curious if 4K DLSS looks better than native 4K (no AA).
    3
  458. The honourable mention is Arch, buut The esteemed, prestigious, renowned, distinguished, venerable mention is Gentoo. It still has 32 bit support. And you can trim it down more than all distros in DT's list, so even 30 (yes, thirty) year old computers can run on it. As long as they have 32 MB of RAM. And an Intel 486 compatible CPU. It won't be fast though. A Pentium 3 tier CPU + about 2 GB I'd say is the minimum for kind-of-modern way of using the computer for modern-day light activities. The down side is that Gentoo is totally not for Linux beginners. There's a lot to learn in order to customize and use it effectively. While we're at it, Debian itself is a good option. Since, you know, 80% of DT's list is based (directly or indirectly) of Debian. And, of course, Devuan too (maybe even better). Lastly, but not least, I'm pretty sure that Slackware is also an excellent distro for this.
    3
  459. If the motherboard allows you, in two years time, you'll be able to upgrade to a R9 4900X or whatever it will be called, on the cheap. So even if 3700X might not be the top performer in everything, you should still have solid upgrade paths.
    3
  460. Linus Torvalds' name is not spelled pronounced the same as Linus Sebastian's name. Because Torvalds is finnish. His name is spelled pronounced Leenoos, but ee and oo are short. There's a short clip on YT where he mentions about how Linux and Linus are spelled pronounced. Edit: meant to talk about pronunciation, not spelling.
    3
  461.  @johndoe5110  Oh, right, I mean to say how it's pronounced, thanks for pointing it out. I'll edit to correct the mistake.
    3
  462. I was curios too. I hate when acronyms aren't spelled out at their first mention. Even when I know already what they mean.
    3
  463. Well said! And having programs simple and focused and modular means that it's easier to pick it to use it for a situation, otherwise you might have extras that make it a hassle/incompatible/too slow.
    3
  464. Mandatory Microsoft account ? Yikes!
    3
  465. 🤢🤮
    3
  466.  @20NewJourney23  In practice IT IS controlled by Google. Edit: I meant to say that Chromium is controlled by Google. Brave, fortunately, isn't.
    3
  467. You're not a number Brodie!
    3
  468. Or make them more repairable, so you can easily inspect them and see that they have nothing extra.
    3
  469. What does servo add ? Or to ask differently, what is Firefox missing ? Genuine question, I do use Firefox and I don't feel like it's slower or something, at least not noticeable. And features-wise I'd say it's about on parity with Chrome and Chromium, except google specific things. Though, come to think of it, I do remember WebRTC working worse in firefox, while it was basically without issues on Firefox Chrome. Though on the other side, Firefox has better developer tools. Well, maybe not overall better, but it has 2 things that I do use that Chrome doesn't have: edit and resend for network requests (chrome has only resend) and "skip this file" when debugging javascript.
    3
  470.  @filonin2  "there is no reason you could not use renewable powered" or, you know, you could use that renewable power to simply not have to use fossil fuels in the first place ? At a greater efficiency/output ? There are some exception when what you say makes sense, but currently it's very VERY rare to have excess renewable power and not be able to use it directly, meaning you can use it for carbon capture.
    3
  471. At the very end: DT: "You like my work ? Want to see more videos about Linux and free and open source software ? Subscribe to DistroTube over on Patreon. Allright guys, peace!" My mind after waiting 15 seconds "Arch &Fedora"
    3
  472. Yeah, the double standard rouding is a bit cringe. But you can tell he's really happy, and with those numbers, I'd be happy too.
    3
  473. Genuine question: is that "they can do that in a few lines in the server" actually a well-spread, often-use thing, that makes sense to be in the server, FOR THE WHOLE ecosystem ? Because, hypothetically, if it was a stupid architecture before, where the server did way too many things, and got to be unmaintably huge and impossible to improve without breaking a lot of other things, then the replacement for that, it makes sense to have better separation and thought put in what should be where. I have no idea of your exact use case, but in general, just because before it worked very easily and now it doesn't (from an effort to develop point of view), it's not enough of an argument in itself, if the new way is more maintainable and allows the ecosystem to evolve and be much better than the old way.
    3
  474.  @hiiaminfi  I think you're so obviously wrong, I'm not even sure if you're genuine. However there is one specific point I want to address here, to leave it written: In regards to "5. He is not fit to be in any position of power and the reasons for that are documented in a lot of detail in the stallman report 6. "He has done great things" is not a reason to keep him in a position of power. It is a reason to not stop using the great things he did in the past, e.g. Thomas Eddison was a terrible person and no sane person would argue that we should therefore stop using electrical light." He ABSOLUTELY is fit to be in a position of power and there are PLENTY of reasons for that. Because he has demonstrated countless times that he knows what free software is about. He knows what privacy is about. He knows how licensing works. Whenever he speaks about having free software or why proprietary is not good and about nuances on the topic, everybody should listen. Because, like I said above, he demonstrated time and again that on this topic he's VERY knowledgeable. I'm sorry that I have to inform you that FSF is about free software not about anybody's views on whatever sexual-related things he's criticised about that he had an opinion on. If you don't like it, go make your DEI Software Foundation and prove it that it's better. That way, the rest of us that actually care about basic human rights and software can continue working on software for everybody and not waste time on things like this.
    3
  475. Aptera's car IS NOT SMALL. Not even close!
    3
  476. To be fair, products like this need to exist. The end goal, the "too much" version has to actually exist for people to know when to stop.
    3
  477. Can't wait for the processes to improve, and also take the quality up so you can have a house which can last 200 years with an average of, say, 24 hours of maintenance per year.
    3
  478. Can't wait for the next console from Microsoft: Twitter box series twitter.
    3
  479. If one of your fans spells your name wrong, you can say that it's not a quality fan :P
    3
  480. Can I be THAT guy ? Why doesn't btrfs integrate with df and du ? Not having to learn a slew of new commands for each fs would be, oh, so neat. Also, how is performance, when using subvolumes and quotas and such ? Is it just a couple percent slower in heavy duty (big listings, logs writing, file retrievals by a server etc all at the same time) ? Or it's more than that ?
    3
  481. @ Yeah, good point.
    3
  482. Regarding that search... if there are many articles with the misspelling, the system might genuinely think that's a different term and that's why it's returning those specific results. Though I don't really know.
    3
  483.  @xcoder1122  The untyped nature is a given that can easily be worked with by manually typing what you need. Classes are not a feature to me, but a regression. Prototypes are superior. Forcing classes into JS is just one of the reasons why I dislike JS frameworks in the first place. And JS direction in general. Something neat, cute, small and powerful that got out of hand by being shoved where it doesn't belong, or transformed (just because it was so powerful that it can!) into something which is just stupid, but, hey, it's almost the same as other languages! And totally something that we didn't actually needed. Really, the things you're mentioning make sense in the backend world where more strictness is required, but JS was not created for backend. So I'm only grading it for browser usage. For backend basically any other popular language is better IMO.
    3
  484. Lunar Lake is only half of next gen, meant for very efficient ultrabooks. The other half is Arrow Lake. While I normally don't like soldered memory (or soldered anything) I'm very excited about Lunar Lake. It should be much more efficient, and it should FINALLY kill the gigantic horde of "bUt aRm iS sO mUcH mOrE eFfiCieNt, die x86 hurr durr". If having proper controls and drivers and software (like Linux) it should finally be on par with Apple's M powered laptops, as far as ability to be efficient (latest manufacturing node, memory on chip and not a massively bloated OS + apps - like Windows). That is, it won't be dragged down by non-ISA factors that make x86 seem less efficient than ARM. Well, I do think it is less efficient, but to a much smaller degree, like 5-10%, nothing massive and certainly not something to ditch x86 over. Hopefully with LunarLake we'll see the real difference.
    3
  485.  @Gljdr  Thank you! I do try to see their side. In their defense if it's so much more expensive for a subway tunnel, the justification should also be clear enough (ie, the costs per person per mile is still lower, in the end). I just wish there were some public information about these things, some cost breakdowns. Do you know if there are any ?
    3
  486. What tylerdean said. It's a bit big and it's hard to replace stuff you don't like from it. For example, check CVE-2018-16865 . Basically journald had a pretty big vulnerability. That's not the issue, it happens. The issue is that you could not (at that time at least) disable or remove it. It was essential to the system, even though it shouldn't have. Imagine being a system administrator and realizing there's a big vulnerability out there, and there's nothing you can do, only wait for the patch to appear. This monolithic design (and no, just because there 60-70 executables doesn't mean it's not monolithic) is the bad part about it. Or following the UNIX philosophy, as some would say. Still, from what I remember, they started to modularise their things, most of them could be used independently or swapped with something else. I haven't checked in almost one year, so I don't know if it got there yet. If it does, then the hate towards it should dissipate too. At least my gripe with it.
    3
  487. *and is now mostly usable - fixed it for you
    3
  488. It's overkill
    3
  489. Why is it a shame that Valve is so involved ? Do you know or fear foul play ?
    3
  490. Except he did the math wrong and forgot a 24 in the big seconds to month multiplications (I so hate how much he rushes) which would make the cost about $28k, when using the 500ms time. With, say, 100ms time, it would be $5k. I do wonder though, how would the serverless response times be. They would be bigger than 90ms, right ? Since there's spin-up time, well, at least for some of them. Is that spin-up time 10ms ? 100 ms ? 1 second ?
    3
  491.  @chaosSpectre370  To be fair, I do think that contracts and proofs should be physical. I feel like going full digital or digital only is a weakness.
    3
  492. :))
    3
  493. @ Correct, except that I still call 128 bits as dual channel (and saw that most people do it too) even though DDR5 has its 64 bits split in dual channels per module.
    3
  494.  @zanagi  Well, who knows, maybe he was hiking a mountain or something and didn't had the means to properly analyze and respond to this stupid drama.
    3
  495.  @Ceelbc  Ha, I wouldn't thought I'll see it. Very weird though. I mean, not for Edge, it does have performance improvements, especially for battery/power usage. And it's on Windows... you never know if it cheats or not. But Opera being faster.... damn! I can hardly believe it!
    3
  496.  @disks86  Maybe it was coded using OOP ?
    3
  497.  @knghtbrd  Terry is right, DT does not and I think never had daily driven Gentoo. He has been on different Arch based (Arco Linux?) distros for more than 4 years (and he started with Ubuntu).
    3
  498.  @sayantansantra2332  Yes, I know that in some places you do get a mac directly, though I don't know how much, to what degree. I do work in IT and we have macs, but you can use a windows laptop too, mac is not required. I also think this mac-centric world is more present in USA, though I don't have numbers to back this up.
    3
  499. That's a nice fairy tale when you get a laptop with Windows already installed and you don't have an administrator account, cannot enter BIOS etc.
    3
  500. Operates slimly ?
    3
  501.  @lorenzo42p  But it is something that can be done manually. I mean, everything works, it's just that you have to manually move the windows every single time you open them. Annoying ? Yes. Stupid ? Yeah. Blocker ? Absolutely not.
    3
  502. You speak as if it's the devs who decide all of these, not the clients themselves. Who always want something they've seen on another website. Developers can certainly be more outspoken about the tradeoffs and/or benefits of simply having less, but they rarely, very rarely control this. In the end it's the one who owns and pays that decides.
    3
  503. Just limiting the power will most likely do jack S#!T, since the main problem is the high voltage. Which is present when a single core boost happens. Which, guess what, is when the processor runs at 30-50W. When at 200-300W, the voltage is actually lower, just like the frequencies are lower at all-core workloads vs single core workloads which can boost to 6.0 GHz.
    3
  504.  zz zip  Think of it as "in beta"
    3
  505. SM2 ? RoN ?
    3
  506.  @folksurvival  Fair enough
    3
  507. If you can use arrays, they are always the fastest
    3
  508. How about reverting Xmobar to the previous version, before this change ? And only upgrade when the antialiasing is ready ? Speaking of, how do you freeze a program version on Arch ? Also, how can you install multiple version of a program and/or library in Arch, without using containers like AppImage, flatpak or docker etc ?
    3
  509.  @11Survivor  LoL, wut ? Let me give a quote from Wikipedia: "Napoleon's parents joined the Corsican resistance and fought against the French to maintain independence, even when Maria was pregnant with him." That is from the Early Life paragraph on Napoleon's wiki page. I don't have the expertise to dispute what's there. It does say in the his father's wiki that he eventually embraced the french goverment. Also, Napoleon learnt french starting at 10 years old. It wasn't his father who teach him french. I don't know where you got that "speaking french at home" and I doubt the value of it if it's late in their lives. Also, Napoleon said that he was more influenced by his mother. I do admit that going to a french school from age of 9 is a pretty good way of learning early enough the french values and culture (though he never learnt to spell right or to speak quickly in french). In the end, is that enough to make him french ? I'd say not. But how much french ? 70% ? 50% ? 30% ? That's a topic of endless debate. I'd say that he has strong italian roots, and not truly fully french, and that it wouldn't have become the same person if he was born and raised in mainland France by a french family.
    3
  510.  @swanvictor887  What a load of bullshit. The "legacy" car brands will survive on the simple fact that Tesla cannot make enough cars to meet the global car demand (not specific EV demand, but anytype-of-car). Then you add that there's a lot of brands that have decent EVs already, and only getting better too, and then you add that Tesla's also have their own problems that some people will not get over with and... ta-daa, the majority of the "legacy" brands will make the switch without disappearing.
    3
  511. LoL, praise the eunuchs!
    3
  512. @Lui "What kind of company releases a high end GPU blahblah" How about you actually check before writing something ? Check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_10_series#Products 1080ti was launched almost 10 months later. And, you know research and discoveries happen. Sometimes you do get 30-35% in a short span. It's not the first time that would happen. Also not to mention that the better thing to bitch about would be that they released 1080ti 7 months later than Titan X and it performs about the same, while costing 700$ instead of 1200$
    2
  513. About it's price: if it's truly just a case and you can insert any ATX motherboard & power supply on it, then you could easily use this for 10 years. The money you would spend on fans in these years could very well make up for it's price. Not to mention the energy savings and the pleasure of being quiet. Could anyone do the math ?
    2
  514. They do. Free software as RMS tells is, DOES NOT mean that it should cost 0$. It's about the freedom to see see/check, modify and (re)distribute the (modified or not) software. By seeing and checking, it means the source code. You can technically see the executable but it takes a massive effort to check it in that form.
    2
  515. I think this list is a too US-biased and rock-biased. Is this based only on awards received ?? I have some complaints: 8) Right now by VH ? Really ?? It is a good song but totally not defining for the 1990s decade. Thunderstruck by AC/DC is WAAY more iconic and remembered world-wide. 7) Puff Daddy ? And no Coolio - Gangsta's paradise ???? I can go hang myself now Also, the 1990's is when cheesy pop & dance got massive. Things like Aqua, Vengaboys, Backstreet Boys, Ace Of Base, Macarena, I'm Blue, Coco Jumbo & soo many others. Granted, it's kind of hard to pick songs... but not even one ???
    2
  516. Holy crap! An entire 54 reply-long thread and all but one of the comments are totally missing the point! @Torgo I'll answer to you, since at least you honestly said your opinion, argumented it and presented it in a non-flaming way. So, the most important thing: Free software DOES NOT mean the software cost 0$. This is a problem with this label, I really wish Stallman would make an effort to name it otherwise so there's less confusion about this. What RMS is advocating for is the freedom to see/check, modify and (re)distribute the (modified or not) software (though on the redistribution of a paid software is kind of weird). So, just like after you buy a table, you are free to check how it was made, and you can modify it and even sell it. RMS wants to be able to do the same things with the software. Theoretically you could check a program by disassembling it, but the time investment for that is massive. And in most cases illegal also. As a side topic, the means of revenue from software in these cases is complicated. Nothing would prevent someone from buying a software then putting it on piratebay and everyone else getting it for free. For games, I guess that one way of doing would be like John Carmack/Id Software did - make it closed source, and release it as open source several years after. But you still have the privacy concern. Highly specialized software (websites included) usually are already done just for a specific company and the company (aka the customer) does receive the source code too, so there is no problem. Getting back to Stallman, another thing is that (from what I've seen) he's not advocating that others should do like him and impose such enourmous restrictions just to be free. He is just stating at what lengths he (and anyone else) has to go in order to be mostly free. Just so that you can see how bad the situation is. So you shouldn't think about how impossible and impractical (paranoic if you like) it would be to do the same, but how good it would be for more and more people to work, collaborate and contribute to free software so being free is easier and more of a sane/easy choice.
    2
  517. What's wrong with 32:9 ? Just curious.
    2
  518. +Ben Wagner Besides what Lucas Bons said already, I think I can give another idea of how it is. Basically every attack or roll/jump you make, can't be stopped. So, if you attack an enemy and realize you'll miss.... you can't cancel it or move away. You have to finish your move. Which might even take longer if you don't hit anything (with big, heavy weapons, like a halberd). In this time the enemies can have all the fun on you. And viceversa, once they started an attack they can't interrupt it, or move while attacking, giving you an opportunity to hit them, if you dodged the attack. That's why it's said to be fair. You also really have to learn how each enemy likes to attack/battle. Even if you're high level and you go to beat some monster/boss, and just want to attack him straight away, you'll die without killing him(or taking more than 10% of the life of the boss) 10/10 times. While if you know what/how to do, you can beat them 10/10 times. So, if you have the patience to learn, and the patience to attack when you should... it's not that hard really. It also feels very rewarding to finally learn and beat some monster/boss, after you got mercilessly hacked into pieces dozens of times. Also finding the numerous secrets. This is one of the reasons it's a great game.
    2
  519. I was about to ask the same! About Caesar III or Pharaoh. No Cilivisation though, since it's not real-time.
    2
  520. @Tiger White - Please, don't say that X has better build quality than W, Y and Z combined. If that were really true W, Y, Z wouldn't have existed anymore. Albeit debateable, people are not THAT stupid. I have a Dell Inspiron laptop from 2007 too, and it still works quite as well. Though I can't really tell how much since I don't use it anymore, it's more like a backup in case my main laptop dies suddenly. However TWO friends bought the next inspiron series, from 2008 and it was shit. Both had non-trivial problems. So I guess that 2007 was a good year for them, while 2008 was a bad one. And I think this applies to all companies. They have an average build quality, but the REALLY GOOD ones are usually a series/model.
    2
  521.  @DimitrisKanakis  "It s still unclear where the power moving the system forward is generated" I have some doubts too, but it's all from the wind. Let me see if I can make an argumentation: Let's say we have a 10m/s wind. The thing is that the wind is so strong, that it will push the cart no matter if it has 10 kg or 100 kg. In that sense, we can say that it's force and power is uncapped, for our purposes (since we don't know at which weight it won't push the cart to 10 m/s speed). But even if the cart has only 0.1 grams, the wind will only transfer enough power to get it to 10 m/s. In all cases it imposes a 10 m/s^2 acceleration, but the mass differs, so the force differs. Now, because of that, the cart can, normally, only use (is this the correct term?) the power required for it's own weight. Let's assume it has 10 kg. And that is on perfect ice (no friction with the ground). The power needed to push 10 kg at 10 m/s means that it will need to have a 10 m/s^2 acceleration directed forward, so the power needed would be m * a * v = 10 * 10 * 10 = 1000 kg * m^2 / s^3 which is 1000 W. And that is the main thing. At the wheel level, they have the same power, since they are forced to move with the cart, at the 10 m/s velocity and the torque is ... I guess, the same force of the cart. But, the wheels are also connected to the propeller. So they transfer (for simplicity) all the 1000W to it. But the propeller has a bigger "wheel", so while it has the same power & force, because it's bigger, it will result in lower speed. It's the torque formula which determines the correlation between force, radius and power. Basically at a given, constant, power, the bigger the radius, the smaller the force and viceversa. And likewise, at a given, constant force, the bigger the radius the smaller the power, since bigger radius means lower velocity. And because friction is a thing, at a low enough force, the thing won't rotate. In a way, I think that the propeller acts as extra weight, extra friction resistance, because it's connected to the wheels, which "saps" more power from the wind, which in turn it uses to propel the cart faster. So the initial 1000W that I said, some of it will be used by the propeller, so there's less power for the wheels. But, the wind will compensate the extra power so the cart still has 10 m/s^2 acceleration forward. So now (well, at the same time) the cart will receive power for both moving the wheels of the cart and the propeller. So you can say that the wind provides the cart with, say, 1500 W, which 1000W are used by the wheels to push the cart forward and 500W used by the propeller. Hope it makes sense. There's also the thing that, if the car is faster than the wind, then theoretically it doesn't receive any power from the wind. I'm still not sure how to explain that. In a way I can say that both the propellere and the wind are, combined, pushing the cart. But then again, if the cart has been faster than the wind for some time, then it should only go on the propeller, and maybe inertia... dunno.
    2
  522. What is that ? What does it do ?
    2
  523. Nice, thanks for the info! Some others pointed that those barriers are actually heavier. I have no idea and I'm lazy to investigate myself, but it might be possible that the cargo is closer to 20 tons. On that idea, if the battery itself adds, at most, 6 tons extra than a diesel engine (7 tons battery, 1 ton less in engine+extras weight), why would it carry 10-14 tons less ? It doesn't make much sense. So I don't think that the drive and steer weigh 60000+lbs. Also, please split your text a bit. It's a wall of text right now. Readable, but not confortably so, once you passed the 2nd row.
    2
  524.  @SR-ry6hs  I don't think it's actually vaporware, just insane claims. I mean, for short to medium distances for low weight high volumes products, it makes a lot of sense. Toilet paper needs to be delivered too! It's just that it doesn't beat diesel in everything (not even close). And it's not even comparable with rail (why Elon isn't sued into jail for that and other impossibly stupid claims like that is beyond me. USA really is disappointing at times)
    2
  525. Shoutout to me and everybody in the comments, the 1% of the 3%. Such a select club we're in! Woohoo!
    2
  526.  @martinda7446  That's a pretty insightful take. Yes, (unregulated) capitalism led to having exploided cheap workforce outside of the country. And many many other problems. Though, the only thing that's truly better, I think, it's a properly regulated capitalism, especially where long term effects are taken into consideration. I really hope I'll leave to see that happen, though I wouldn't be surprised if things continue to go downhill.
    2
  527. There's Citroen Ami and it's class of cars... wait, they're quadricycles. Dang it. If only they could make a slightly bigger version of it, but on the same principles.
    2
  528. Yup. Same idea of living paycheck to paycheck. One time when you don't get it, or it's late, or it's smaller, or your needs increase (any kind of urgency) and you might not be able to pay other things, creating problems for others or for yourself. Having money not spent, which depreciate because of inflation is less efficient, but the problems you might get if you don't have some extra savings might be worth hundreds of years of 1-3 paychecks savings in inflation depreciation. In the end, if you have a three-digit IQ and realize that problems ALWAYS arise (not "if", but "when"), the long-term cost of having some savings (others might call it "insurance") far outweights the benefits or running fully lean. A bit off-topic, it's so nice to see that the individual (or bot) who keeps spamming about a certain person related to a certain religion is completely ignored. I feel like I'm in an elevated realm, where all people are smarter or have more wisdom. While I'm here, I hope everybody has a great day!
    2
  529. Our RMS in heaven, hallowed be your name Your FSF come. Your kernel patch be done, on our workstations as it is on cloud servers. Give us this day our daily updates. And forgive us our vulnerabilities, as we also have forgiven the FOSS developers And to not bring us into closed gardens but rescue us from proprietary software. For the GNU and FSF and FOSS are yours forever. POSIX! On a more serious note, this is an interesting idea. Also, I have to note out that mentioning the stuff in the interview is totally the right thing to do. That is, if you want a functioning society where people can trust one another. But then again, here we are, coming up with religions to impose basic human rights, because it doesn't work the normal way. Sigh.
    2
  530. Dang it, I forgot to add GPL into the prayer
    2
  531.  @anon_y_mousse  The rights of privacy and the rights of free speech (this last one isn't directly impeded by proprietary software, but cases where people were cancelled from their subscriptions based on their beliefs happened)
    2
  532.  @FullNietzsche  Interesting. Theoretically speaking you should have two sources of some IPC improvements: from Broadwell to Skylake and from getting the Spectre and Meltdown mitigations in hardware. Not something huge, indeed. I'd estimate to be something like 20%. But, it's also comparing a flagship to an i5. It's still better in absolutely everything, at half the price and half the power consumption, right ?
    2
  533.  @davidereverberi5279  You didn't understood what I wrote. It's because Skylake (and before) doesn't have the hardware mitigations that Comet Lake has which makes it kind of an IPC increase. It's basically just much less of a penalty to the IPC on Comet Lake than it is on Sky Lake. Next, you have to add that on top of Sky Lake IPC improvement over Haswell. Here's a review from when 6700K was fresh: https://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation You can see there, near the bottom, that it says 5.7% IPC over Haswell on Sky Lake with DDR 3, and 6% IPC increase when Sky Lake was on DDR 4. That was quite low, buuut, that was with DDR 4 on 2133 MT/s, the lowest most basic DDR 4. Which was normal back then, as it was new. Now, with 3200-4400 MT/s being the norm, with nice timings, that should be easily at least another 5%. All three combined should add up to about 20%. That is, from Haswell to Comet Lake.
    2
  534. Yeah, the amount of "just reinstall windows" is staggering. I still use Windows 10 on my laptop, the same install that the laptop came with, a bit over 6 years ago. If you know to take good care (and don't have sketchy or faulty hardware/drivers) windows can be rock solid too. After I got the Pro licence key and disabled automatic updates (was a bit of a hassle) I even got a 100 day uptime (a bit by mistake, I usually try to do the updates and restart about once per month). I wouldn't know to take as good care or to troubleshoot if I simply went the way of "just reinstall it". I always try to find out what the problem is and how it can be solved. Sometimes it is a very quick/easy fix. I have some friends that still think that you should reformat+reinstall every 6 months to a year or so. And me in 24 years I've never reinstalled Windows in order to fix it, only to upgrade it. Jeez.
    2
  535. On the writing is thinking - it is an overgeneralization. Not the first one made here, and I'll bet it's not the last one either. But the tips are generally useful. And the arguments can be interesting, sometimes it's something I didn't thought of. But, yeah, you do have to filter it to your case.
    2
  536. I don't understand the relevancy of that WAAAY OVERUSED "they're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats" clip. Of all the stupid things Trump said, this has to be on the 2000th place in that list. It's sincerely annoying to see it so much as if it's of any importance (one way or another).
    2
  537.  @electric26  LoL
    2
  538. Frankly I always thought that the forcing of using classes in JS (with those extra closures for having private variables and _super or whatever it was so you can call the "parent" and so on) was a regression. Prototype, being dynamic is just better. You can do everything you can with classes, but also more. And it is so... javascript! Forcing classes is like forcing mediocrity.
    2
  539.  @NoBoilerplate  The topic fits the channel name very well, so I think you couldn't've gone wrong here.
    2
  540. DoS not DDoS! Why do so many people get this wrong ?
    2
  541. It's especially difficult to categorize all these cases. I'd like to think that everybody who wants to play/install/buy a non-platinum game would read what exactly the issues are, before continuing further.
    2
  542. Damn, I'm late to the party. This was a really nice showing, and I like Thomas and Sono. However, I do have a negative point, to ask: why put a solar panel on a car and not on a rooftop ? For the short to mid term, until we have some saturation of solar roofs, wouldn't that panel generate more on a roof, thus better help with the CO2 and the climate change ? Say, if it's put on a parking lot, keeping shade to the parking below, it can have near peak performance the full year. On a car, especially one like in this video, it can generate 0 W for days, depending on where it is sitting.
    2
  543. Here I place a formal request for Theo to STOP DOING MULTIPLE MULTIPLICATIONS AT ONCE. And in general to STOP RUSHING over delicate things/parts like that. The rather large and significant math mistake at the end would've been TRIVIALLY avoided by not rushing so much and doing the math in multiple steps. Like first stating how many requests are per minute, then per hour, per day then per month. Or at least something like 3600 seconds per hour, 720 hours per month to keep things still simple. I really mean it that it was really a rush, as what I requested above takes SECONDS extra to write. Can you NOT feel dumb for doing a big mistake because you wanted to save, say, 1 minute, out of a 74 minute video, kinda spoiling it at the end ? Also, Theo, please place the multiplication in the written part too. If you miss something, you AND US can see it there much more easily and not have to search in the calc app history. Not to mention that you switch things so fast there, it's very hard to keep up and spot the mistake right then (that is, without pausing), it's almost looking like you WANT to hide something (which I know you don't, I'm just stating how bad this is) After all, it was stated that serverless is more expensive and that the cost difference might not matter that much anyway, so the overall conclusion is still kind of there, but it's still so SOO frustrating to see (not the first time) such glaring mistakes that also might make someone less knowledgeable really question the video and conclusion. For something so easily avoided. STOP RUSHIIIIIIIII
    2
  544. I think he and Brian Johnson from AC/DC and many others, like it was suggested in the intro, are in a different list, for hard rock.
    2
  545. Apparently the robovan can lift its shell, which Munro actually said at the end of the video. Which would take care of the potholes and such, if it lifts enough.
    2
  546. @ @RandoTark  That 53% more IPC is from FX to Ryzen ? Or from Ryzen 1 to Ryzen 2 ? If it's from FX to Ryzen, then that doesn't really count, since it's 4.5 years difference, and FX lineup was lagging behind. And unfortunately in GN's graphs, there are no 9th gen (if you can call it like that) 4c/8t intel CPUs, to see the difference from 2600K. In Passmark's CPU benchmark, the 9900K does have a 2900 single thread rating, which is quite amazing. What I am trying to say is that the technology is pretty much out of low hanging fruits. So, both intel and AMD will only offer small improvements from now on, at least on silicon based chips. I'm not denying that Intel's launches have produced smaller and smaller performance gains. The new uarch from intel might be the ever-delayed 10nm cannon?ice?whateverlake. Which is also taking them 4?5? years already.
    2
  547. The better parts of literally not having any friends :)
    2
  548. DDR5 might actually bring some new performance, not just slightly more bandwidth. But I wouldn't rush to buy it the moment it arrives. As with all tech, it might take another full year until the great products are to be seen.
    2
  549. I think this is perfect with TWM. I mean, a normal keyboard has ONLY, what, 105 keys ? Getting 17 more from the mouse has to be a god send. With the 4 modifier keys (Ctrl, Alt, Shift and Super), that basically 68 more key combinations. Sweet! Oh, and you can use more than a modifier key too! On a more serious note, those keys can actually allow you to permanently keep one hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse, as long as you don't have much text to type. With the modifier keys, you really could have all the TWM administration keybindings controlled with a modifier key (or none) + a mouse key.
    2
  550. I guess that for WatchMojo they are scremo or something. Quite sad.
    2
  551. The sad thing is that it mostly needs hardware manufacturers support, and Linux is no central organization with lots of funds (or dominating market presence) to convince the manufacturers to do it. Well, it has the Linux foundation, but it doesn't have that kind of finances. And Linux desktop is still only a minor minor part of Linux.
    2
  552.  @censoredterminalautism4073  :))
    2
  553.  @GSBarlev  Impossible to tell without at least knowing what his 1 minute uptime was.
    2
  554.  @vilian9185  OpenGL is still in development ? I swear I've seen 4.6 for ages. Will there be a 5.0 ?
    2
  555. Yup! Well summarized!
    2
  556. One silver lining that I can think of, about all of this, is that if Apple spends so much effort into making these so much of a closed garden, at one point this effort will simply eat too much into their revenue. That is, it will cost them a lot on the manpower needed to design those things. And the things themselves will make the product cheaper / consume more / weigh more something like that. Well, so far it wasn't enough, but with time, maybe the competition will rise, and by virtue of simply not having to invest that much of everything into closing the garden, they will have the superior product. It's like hardened products vs normal consumer products. The hardened products are always more expensive, while at the same time having less performance. Well, at least in the normal conditions. In extreme weather for example, a hardened product will work, while a normal consumer one won't. In this case, Apple will have a hardened product, but not against natural elements, but against being repaired. And, I hope, at one point it will simply be inferior in performance or price/performance.
    2
  557.  @LeslieBurke8  True, I won't hold my breath either. Truth to be told, in some aspects, Apple have the superior product. Be it by design, performance or simply the ecosystem and the idea that things simply work. Hopefully, with the rise of Linux on desktops, maybe the superior part of the software will vanish as really good things will start to be supported for Linux too. And on the hardware side, both AMD and Intel made a comeback and have pretty good CPUs and APUs. Still have to catch up on performance/watt, but given that in general the performance needs haven't risen that much, the things you can do on 15W or lower have risen regardless. Apple will have another home run with M3 as it will be the first 3nm processor in the laptop space and again it will be significantly more powerful at the same very low power consumption. This is the same that they had with M1, first 5nm on the market. Now that AMD will come with 5nm, they will actually be better than M1 and M2, but that means nothing for the normal consumer, when AMD/Intel come with the good product almost 2 years later. Hopefully M3 and M4 will have better competition.
    2
  558. The CPU certainly isn't the problem for moving to Linux. On the AI part, you could say that if you tell it to generate things that you imagined, it's still you doing the creation, and the AI is just (like a tool) facilitating, helping you transpose your imagination. The counterpoint is that many people aren't and won't do that.
    2
  559.  @LTPottenger  Interesting. I still say that it's not the CPU lacking support, unless it somehow belives it has an iGPU when it doesn't. From what you say, it seems it's confused somehow about the GPU. I can't give any actual advice, since I've never tried that combo, I'm still on an almost 8 year old laptop with Intel 6th gen CPU and an NVidia 1060 GPU. I installed Gentoo and I can't say I had any major issues or problems, though I think I had to install the nvidia proprietary drivers twice initially or something. I actually had more issues with the Wi-Fi card until I got it working. Booting from live USB works ? Including multiple distros ? That would be a sign that it's not processor support. Unless, don't know, maybe you installed Debian and the kernel version doesn't know about Ryzen 8000, that might be a thing. But almost all other distros have a newer kernel which should instantly solve the problem. Or maybe you can upgrade the kernel in Debian too, though I don't know how easy that is.
    2
  560. To be fair, from what I heard, it was kind of bad. First of all, entirely single threaded and thus very slow. It's why systemd was so successful initially.
    2
  561. Good idea of a video! I have several points to make: - the term "review" is a bit subjective. For me it always hinted some sort of completeness. That is, to paint an accurate description of the entity reviewed, which implies going more in depth, in order to know what and how works, to not be fooled by something pretty that will break on the next update. After reading/watching a review, I expect that anything that's not there to be details of little importance. So in that regard, I, too, agree that what DT does is more "first look" of a Linux/BSD/GNU distro - I think there is value in having a more in-depth/longer-tried look on a distro, including for newer-to-Linux people. When looking at a "first look", you see mainly how it looks and the general idea of what a distro wants to be. However, it doesn't tell you much about how it actually functions, how it is to daily drive it. For people to switch to a(nother) distribution, they need to also know how hassle-free or hassle-light the new distro is to drive, not just to install and look at. Things like how often should you update stuff, and how does that work. Customizing something non trivial, how is that done. When an update breaks, how easy is to fix it or revert it. When something doesn't work, how easy is to make it work. Upgrading from one version to another, is that ok (where applicable, like Fedora 36 to 37 or Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04) ? It's things like that that also help when choosing a distro, that give you some knowledge and peace of mind that you'll get along ok with that distro, since you have somewhat of a deeper understanding of how it works and how to tackle it in times of need. Of course, some of this is maybe not distro specific but specific to a package manager or specific to Linux in general. If I can make a really bad analogy, it's like having a first date and the girl tells you that she cooks. Three months into the relationship you realize that she only cooks pastas and doesn't even want to try to make a soup. Or 1 month after you installed a distro you realize that watching videos on YouTube makes your laptop an airplane simulator because the distro you chose doesn't have the browser with hardware acceleration or doesn't have the proprietary NVidia drivers. Things like there are very valuable to be known beforehand (man, do I like soup!) - lastly, regarding reviews or first looks, if they can be harmful. Well, they can, even if the reception from both viewers and the maintainer(s)/owner(s) is positive. It's all about setting expectations. The idea is that a distro might get a first look, where it's shown that is nice and all. And an user (probably a novice) might try to install that, but have all sorts of problems. Either at installation or later, when something doesn't work. And that person might quit Linux altogether after a bad enough experience. I think the best example of how to do it right is Gentoo. Everybody reviewing Gentoo mentions that it's source based and that is time consuming, unless you have a really fast computer. And that, even so, it's for advanced users, all the responsability is shifted to you, you basically only have several tools for automating stuff. And this is good, it gives the warnings that it needs to do so somebody seeing it, might like it, but realize that it won't have the time to actually maintain that.
    2
  562. I'm in the same boat. But because he's DT, I asked that, with the same disclaimer than I'm on the side of not believing this is actually useful for the society. I asked that on the first video on the other channel, but I think I'm shadow banned, I have no replies and no likes, kind of like nobody sees it. I'm actually curious, because I'm hoping that DT wouldn't go into this, unless he feels that it's at least okish, morally speaking. I can never know. But since I'm not that much into this, it's an opportunity to learn, maybe I'm the one that will change my mind. So far he explained what the options are, and overall I got the idea, it's a nice tool for lower risks, by the looks of it. But on the "how is this useful for the society" part I'm still clueless. I mean, for the companies and for actual investors (people that are actually there and put money to invest, not to simply profit by playing the trading game) for them I understand, it's a way for a company to receive funding fast, just by providing trust that it will do well (financially and/or for the society). But for those that are only there to play the trade game and profit from it, I feel like they're simply intermediaries, leeches that profit from the success of others and overall making the place worse (they can also amplify bad stuff like hype or other speculation, which sometimes can be fabricated). I really hope that I'm at least partially wrong and that these traders actually do provide some value for the system, but I highly doubt that. Sigh
    2
  563. I'm very curious too. Theoretically, if they have 9 servers, even if they're very beefy (think of maxed out Epyc CPUs), that's still, I think, very cheap compared to most all cloud solutions of the same size. And something tells me that they don't have hundreds of programmers and devops either.
    2
  564. *Almost native performance
    2
  565. You said it yourself, it's a 100% compile time increase. Note the "compile time" not "performance". In a race, when your lap time doubles, you don't say that the speed got a 100% increase. It's halved aka it's a 50% decrease aka it degraded by 50%. Same with performance. It was also in the wording "degradation" which implies reduction.
    2
  566. AND that he goes to jail.
    2
  567. Weird, for me, his level is normal.
    2
  568.  @SpaceBanana  Okay, fair enough. Still weird to see so many people in this thread use the wrong term, and none using it correctly.
    2
  569. I don't get this video. I mean, the story is nice, and it makes sense. But it's a story of why Theo ditched Windows and went to Macs (initially because hardware, then because software aka MS made Windows bad). Linux was just a tangent. And other than maybe Photoshop, I don't see why the "gave up" on Linux, it simply looks like Theo didn't try it in an environment where it had to actually code. If that were to happen, I'm sure he would've loved Linux the same as Mac. I'll be waiting for Apple to force something to not work anymore or to be upgraded into an inferior version, for the love of Open Source to come back to Theo. Where nobody can force you to stop using something.... though in practice it does happen too (hard to use very old with very new programs at the same time, though AppImages and VMs can mostly solve that), but it's really REALLY rare that it will negatively impact you.
    2
  570. I think you didn't understood it. If you follow ALL the points, then your project will be just about the FOSS (say, Hyperland). With no socio-political issues attached. If someone tries to bring a socio-political issue on the table, then it will be informed that is out of scope. If they insist, for any reason, then they are not nice and can be booted off the project.
    2
  571. You said that this is not a troll post, and I appreciate the well-written post, but I hate to inform you that in the context of this video, you're quite off-topic. Also, I do want to tell you that FOSS and Free software are not the same thing. That's why FOSS stands for Free and open source software - emphasis mine. You can write free software (that is not open source) and monetize it. Technically you can make money with FOSS too, but it's more the exception than the rule. It's certainly quite difficult, uncertain, and clearly you're not going to get rich off of it. At least in the current times. If FUTO gets bigger, we might someday live in a world where people have understood the value of FOSS and donate to it on a regular basis when they get the means to (aka when they have enough income) and then working in FOSS can be an actual secure, well-paid job.
    2
  572.  @SeralyneYT  I didn't knew of those takes, and I'm a bit surprised. Do you have more info on that ? Like what/when/where they were said/written ? Or a video/article covering those ?
    2
  573.  @RunePonyRamblings  While I'm not convinced, you have a good point!
    2
  574. You lost me at "Windows and Linux". I think it's standard just on Mac. Never heard or seen it before watching Jeff's video now.
    2
  575. He's testing the CPUs in their out-of-the-box configuration. Nothing wrong here, really. It's a bit silly that it's a desktop CPU versus a laptop CPU, but given the time difference between the two, it's expected that the newer CPU to be visibly faster, even when having less power. What is missing, is testing for out-of-order processing, using RAM too. Because there has been (I think) significant improvements in this regard. And these tests completely bypass that.
    2
  576.  @redwolfexr  The thing that is not apparent just looking at the Aptera car in an image is that it's actually a big car. It's slightly longer than normal cars, but because of its sleek design and being a 3 wheeler, it doesn't appear so. Still, I'm not truly convinced that it's not a scam. Seems a bit too good to be true. And they offer way too little information.
    2
  577. Agreed
    2
  578. He is basically doing what trains did in the 1900's - except this is worse than trains. How people got so excited over this nothingburger of totally not new, not cheap, not better (not even close) technology is way beyond me. Like having the smallest tunnel possible, with absolutely 0 safety & redundancy features (good luck to anyone involved if a fire breaks out or if a car breaks down in the tunnel) with 62 cars with drivers (when they had in the contract that it would be fully autonomous pods, good luck for the extra totally not little cost) with cars driving at 30 mph ? Having to deliver 4400 passengers/hour and clearly not being able to even hit half of that ? Oh wow, I am soooo impressed /s
    2
  579. The video went pretty well for the first 10 minutes. But I cannot disagree more with the reason Linux didn't hit mainstream. People not liking the changes absoultely isn't it (not to mention that saying that there's also clearly no other reason is downright stupid). Yes, not liking change is a thing and that provides resistance. People will postone, will not understand and so on. But there's plenty of people who tried Linux and ... didn't switch (le gasp!). The main reason is that, for many different reasons, Linux desktop is NOT as easy to use as a Windows and a Mac. Yeah, in some situations Linux works flawlessly out of the box and your Windows will be stuck in a boot loop. But overall, Windows and macs work in 90%+ of the cases, while Linux is somewhere at 50%. Because NVidia (maan, f**k NVidia), because missing wireless drivers, because some stupid update broke GRUB, because you lack Adobe Photoshop, because it crashes when it wakes from sleep AND SO MANY MORE that make Linux harder to use than Windows or Macs, overall.
    2
  580. I'm with you on this one. While I don't know exactly how would a large project / website would look without OOP, working with Magento 2 frustrates me. It's sooo over engineered. Just checking a normal, non-trivial but also not rocket-science-level flow I have to go through 60 files. WTaF is wrong with OOP nowadays ? The "single responsability principle" of SOLID and those idiotic "have functions of at most 30 lines, preferably 4" and other garbage like that made things so unusable. Also, one thing more on this, there is still a rush to convert everything from inheritance to composition. People realized that even that OOP from 10-15 years ago was utter BS, but hey, THIS TIME they got it right, right ? Ok, rant off, sorry for the spam.
    2
  581. I was searching for someone to point this out. This is correct, about half of Steam users on Linux are on Steam Decks, meaning the DESKTOP part of Steam is about 1%, not 2%. Frankly it is much lower than what I expected.
    2
  582. Yeah, not to mention how misleading is to show the single core improvements of CPUs compared to basically increase core counts on GPUs. Guess what, CPUs are getting more cores too. I can't think of any ANY graph made by NVidia to be correct and useful or insightful at the same time.
    2
  583.  @christopherconard2831  The unique phrases that you speak for american and british? english are basically non existant in "moldovan" vs romanian language. Their accent is different, at least when comparing from someone from west or south of Romania (the ones near Moldova's border, ie also in the Moldova's historical reagion share the accent) but otherwise they're identical.
    2
  584. It's not zero. Much energy was wasted into making the bullshit claims, and into the others parroting them, then Thunderfoot debunking them, and by everybody who watched the original videos and/or this one. GBs if not a couple of TBs of uploading and encoding (for all resolutions) are not free. Neither streaming PBs of videos (1 GB of one video * 1 million views = 1 PB. Ok, for 1080p resolution, the video certainly doesn't have 1 GB, but it's 4 videos, so combined, they surely passed the Petabyte mark)
    2
  585. I agree on your first part, but fully disagree with the last paragraph about "if you're a tech reporter, report on the tech". I mean, you can certainly skip the un-interesting to you stuff, just like I skip political stories some times and sport stories almost all the time. But if something is in the tech, or affects the tech, how, why shouldn't that be reported ? You mean that, say, hypothetically a news item like "Company X in tech is shutting down half of its servers in preparation of the incoming hurricane and floods that will hit tomorrow" should NOT be reported because some people "don't want a weather report" ?? Should the fact that the organization that funds and steers the Linux development decides to spend less and less on that and increasingly more on totally unrelated stuff NOT be reported ? Something like this, where, if people know about it in time, can rally up and push against some stupid political change, so they can save the project NOT be covered, because it's a news item that's political in nature ? I'm just baffled beyond words of how can you say that. It's beyond obvious to me that this SHOULD.... no, sorry, this MUST be reported on. You can simply filter them out if you're not interested. But the reporting of something that affects tech, by tech journalists absolutely must be done. That's journalism 101. Jeez Louise!
    2
  586. Hey DT! Why don't you use printf for ensuring the right amount of spaces ? That for is actually ridiculous! In both the terminal and in C, you have printf. In terminal you would use this as printf "%78s\n" "text guaranteed to ocupy 78 characters, left padded" With 78 being the minimum width, s denoting that it's a string (and the default padding is a space for strings, a zero for numbers). This way (usually the norm with numbers) the padding is added to the left of the variable outputted, (aka right aligned) and that is kind of useless in your example. For that you have to add a minus to the width specifier, like this: printf "%-78s\n" "text left aligned but still 78 characters wide" Check the GNU documentation (you can check C documentation of the function too, but there's minor subtle differences between the C function and the shell program)
    2
  587. If by good reason you mean "because it pollutes lsblk", this alone is one of the dumbest reasons to drop Ubuntu. Or any other distro for that matter. That's like saying that you'll never buy a Bugatti Veyron because, say, you don't like the silver color (theoretically, I don't know what color(s) it has). Like really, I can't think of anything that would be smaller/pettier than this, to complain about and above else, to ditch an entire distro. And I say that as someone who doesn't like Ubuntu in its current state, and I'm not a fan of snaps either.
    2
  588. I'd say that a more effictive way would be to be involved into their discussions and push against stupid things. Though supporting the alternatives is not bad either.
    2
  589.  @r_v_t  The big 4 ? I assume you mean Windows, Linux and MacOS.... what's the fourth ? Android (which is also Linux, but with different userland tools) ?
    2
  590. Sorry to put this out to you, but many artist are and were as$h0les Or at least very very difficult to work with, and hard to be a close person to. Aka, very focused on their project and their passion, neglecting everything else. If you want to check all the people of all the bands, movies, paintings, sculptures etcetc in detail, you''ll be put off by 80% of them. I'd say to separate the two, the artist and the art, and only make sure that you don't promote ahole artists in a way that enables them to be more ahole-y. At least on the dead ones that's very easy. With Linux Mint, maan, that's so disappoint to hear. I hope the community can steer it off of that though.
    2
  591.  @storm_f1788  e
    2
  592. ​ @sulai9689  Here is a list: 3:15 There was encapsulation before OOP, including in C 5:28 "before OO there were no maps or lists or sets" - this is 100% wrong from every possible angle. First no OO is required for that, check the article "Dataless Programming" by R. M. Bazler of RAND Corp from 1967. Second, a very trivial example, linked lists exist from 1956. LISP, one of the oldest high level programming language, extensively uses lists. Since 1958. And in general, there have always been abstractions in programming and the more complex languages become, the more abstractions they acquire, this has nothing to do with OOP at all 6:05 polymorphism is not an OOP idea either. Ad-hoc polymorphism if I'm not mistaken, first appeared in ALGOL 68. Very not OOP. What he refers more specifically is subtyping polymorphism, I assume specifically against interfaces. What he says about printers is extremely well shown to work without OOP in open, read and write syscalls. You have no idea, and do not have to bother at all knowing what exactly you are writing to. It's having an API what matters to allow polymorphism. Getting back to interfaces, the ML language has many of these (polymorphism, encapsulation, modularity) also without OOP, since 1973. You could say that this specific polymorphism - interface subtype - was created and popularized by OOP, but overall, he still presented it in a very misleading manner. 8:45 overwhelming majority of drivers are written in C. And not just in Linux.
    2
  593. So, did Jay try to change the power supply too, or only everything else ?
    2
  594. I remember with Rocket Lake aka Intel's 11th gen appeared, with AVX512, that in the applications that were able to use AVX512 it was literally 5-6 times faster than the rest of the CPUs. But those apps were quite niche, things you'd use on a specific workplace or for some simulation I think.
    2
  595.  @terrydaktyllus1320  Regarding emojis: I remember seeing a video sometime ago and the presenter argued that they're basically an evolution of punctuation. If you think about it, with punctuation we are signaling the tone, giving hints about how it should be read. Knowing the tone, you can get a feel of the mood (like being sarcastic, or throwing an idea as a joke, not being serious) and you'll be able to more closely convey or understand what is being communicated, including non verbal hints. Edit: forgot to add: this is especially helpful when talking with people you don't know. With your friends, just from their style, you should be able to infer the mood only from the text. But on a stranger is much harder to know what they are thinking, and the possibility for misinterpretation is much higher. Of course, the fact that is overused and mindlessly used is another topic.
    2
  596. But, you know, maybe you do have a 2nd or 3rd gen intel CPU and you want to upgrade to a better processor which can keep up as much as possible, like 5-7 years. In this case, even though it's very expensive, a 9900K might be good, as it will the games/applications where it's 60% better than a 6700K will increase, and having only one upgrade in 6 years might actually be cheaper than 2 smaller upgrades at 3 years.
    2
  597. I have a question, if somebody knows, as I don't have the game. I know that there's a setting to control the crowd density (or something like that), effectively meaning how much people are around, and that it's on the gameplay settings. Theoretically this impacts CPU load, because of each person's AI. My question is: what was this setting at on these benchmarks ? Also, with the massive amount of people that suggest the SMT-bugfix, if that is confirmed to be true, I expect a followup video for this, but it would be good to wait for more fixes (possible even improvements or optimisations) to arrive before dedicating time for another full video. Cheers!
    2
  598.  @CptJistuce  LoL, nice one!
    2
  599.  @TheSimoc  Interesting. Didn't knew the details of Windows' prefetch. Can't say I'm shocked to find out, lol.
    2
  600. Oooor, crazy idea, you can stay and make sure Linux still works the way you think it should ?
    2
  601. Besides having well structured, well done etc documentation like other said, there's one more thing: context. Just saying is "having documentation" is too general. Does it mean a man page ? --help option ? A long web page ? A wiki ? A series of tutorials ? These all are good resources, but for different contexts. So, for command line programs, a man page is required. Unless I'm mistaken "man" comes from "manual". A manual has to be detailed and, as best as possible, complete. So I'd say that a massive 100-page long man page for find is ok. But, staying on the command line programs, you also, many times, only need to check some flags, get some examples and things like that. That's were something like --help or maybe even more flags (maybe --examples?) come to mind/help. You should have all the details in the man page, starting with how to get these quicker, simpler bits of help, so you can type your command in less than 1 minute and go on continue what you're working on. For complex programs (like Blender, or even ffmpeg) I think that a wiki and a series of tutorials is also needed. Especially if using images or video or audio would simplify the teaching/education (those cases where an image is worth 1000 words). For source code, yeah documentation is good. Since I'm a programmer myself, the problem is usually that very few people bother writing documentation (because it's hard, tedious and excessively boring. Few, few people have the drive or talent or passion to write documentation). However, a bit of suckless mentality does good here. The source code should be as easy to understand as possible (of course, without compromising quality) and only then, when needed (like explaining WHY a function or some line is needed, or what a flag or something like that might mean in an external context) the documentation should be written, usually trying to be as concise as possible. Back to contexts, installing an operating system is not like simply running a command to find all your php files. You do need to understand what is happening. So, while reading most of the stuff in the Arch or Gentoo wiki will take days, you will be better off it, have much less (potential) headaches from the mistakes that you didn't made, that could've also been spread to those who you asked for help. Since I mentioned, maybe everywhere where there's documentation, the scope of it should be mentioned too. Like a man page could state that it's a long read, if you need a quick nudge to get over your work, check these help/examples. If you do know that you want a complex case then you know you'll have to spend more time to read the man page. A blender wiki could state that learning it will take probably months and that you should start with understanding some terminology and flows and do some tutorials. A documentation like Arch or Gentoo install guide could (I don't remember if it does) also mention the important parts that you should know and that probably you'll need several days of reading + trying to install in a virtual machine, before achieving the install, if you've never done it before. Overall, the documentation should set the expectations of how much information it provides and how quick it is to comprehend it. Edit: and also, try to provide shorter/quicker bits of information, where it's safe to.
    2
  602.  @dm8579  1) Yes, it CAN help. If both USA and EU have been acting faster on the helping side (some of which they themselves set the deadline), maybe Ukraine would've recovered the territory by now 2) Ukraine didn't ask just for money, it requested other things too, like the ability to use rockets in Russia 3) Don't act as if US has absolutely nothing to gain. A weakened Russia means more gas exports (which it already increase) for USA, and a lot of weapons selling to all ex-soviet countries that want to get rid of Russia, like the baltic states, Ukraine, Georgia, not to mention the increase of military spending for most of NATO, which a good portion comes back to USA as weapons sold 4) In the end it's still up to USA how it uses its own money, you can't fault Zelensky for asking
    2
  603. Yeah! Go System76! Somebody interview Richard Stallman about this. Poor man might actually upgrade to a modern laptop/CPU now!
    2
  604.  @davidgomez79  Tell me you're a hater without telling me you're a hater. And where did you find that at $99 ? It seems to be $129.
    2
  605. Could R7 3800XT be configured to run at the frequencies of 3700X, but have a lower voltage & power consumption, so you can keep it at 50 degrees Celsius, with the CPU fan running at a really quiet 30 dBa ?
    2
  606. It is not. You can add a string, let's say of 150 characters in length, that's only at difference 10 of another 150 characters or so string in the original input.txt. But make this new string have the initial first 100 characters be the same as the original string, and the 10 difference to occur in the last 50 characters. The "optimized" Fortran-like program would incorrectly compute that the minimum distance is 0, while in reality the minimum distance is still 7.
    2
  607. @ACodingWoof You make some valid points, but, by your definition, what is the difference between a kernel and an operating system ?
    2
  608.  @relentlessmadman  Windows calculator already has it. If you think that in the 21st century it's normal to have to spend time on that, then I'm sorry that you don't value your time. And the others'. Because if this video has 110K viewers, and let's say 30k of them are not UK+US based, then 30k * 10 seconds = massive waste. Not to mention that if you have several values like inches, feet, then miles per gallon, miles per hour, pound force and other like that (totally realistic in a car video) then it's much more than 10 seconds.
    2
  609.  @BobbyFeltault  That's a great attitude!
    2
  610. I've got a question, have you considered watching or just listening for the whole video ? :)
    2
  611. Thank you!
    2
  612.  @homfes  Ha, didn't know that, thanks!
    2
  613. You do realize that the 300 mile is an average ? By it's definition it won't satisfy all the people.
    2
  614. Java is so verbose, that even when I was more of a text-editor fanboy, I would've used an IDE for Java with no thought. Making so many files, and writing so much boilerplate code by hand would've pushed me to jump off of a cliff or something. Now, I mainly code in PHP. When I was on simpler projects years ago, things like Wordpress, using a text editor was actually ok. I don't like autocomplete, so using an IDE wouldn't've added much. However, nowadays, when I work on projects that are OOP and there's literally tens of thousands of files (of course, from the framework & other 3rd party modules), I would feel just as overwhelmed as I said for Java. Because now, when I follow some logic, I have to open up to 50 (yes, fifty) files. It would be insane to do that in a text editor, unless it would work exactly the same as in an IDE.
    2
  615. Captain Pedantic here: in the Civ 6 benchmark the R9 5900X is 15% (not 13%) faster than i9 10900K, meaning that it completes turns in 13% less time. * flies out *
    2
  616. @ But that's the thing. With something like SteamOS, they seem to be willing to test it, and, through it, Linux. And they have a lot of views. It will solidify Linux as mainstream.
    2
  617.  @ararune3734  I paid for it my Window 10 Pro key. I got it on a sale for only about $8. And before that I bought Win 10 Home for my mom's computer, though that I didn't got on sale, it was something like $40 IIRC. My laptop came with Win 10 Home preinstalled, that I later applied the 10 Pro on. The thing is, in both cases we're actually using it. So we're paying for it, because that's what a normal, decent human should be doing. Pay for it and then you have the right to complain to Microsoft about its downsides. If one would be using it without paying for it, that's being a hypocrite (with few exceptions). And a contributor to the shitshow ad-infested apocalypse we're in right now.
    2
  618. * "Acorn RISC Machine" (not risk, lol)
    2
  619.  @theBabyDead  Ok, fair enough :)
    2
  620. Underrated comment!
    2
  621. Completely agree. Given how many bad examples exist, I think this intel generation going with 10000 is, by far, the least offender. It is annoying, but it has certain key features: it's consistent and predictable with the established pattern. Also, it's (again) just an iteration. Absolutely no need to get a new name for this. They could work on the K, X, XE, F, S OMFG letters in the back though. Oh, and in their mobile lineup, those names are pretty bad. 10710G7 ? What ? (don't know if I remembered a correct name, but you get the idea). 10700K ? The i7 model following the 9700K ? Yeah, perfectly fine.
    2
  622. Frankly, I think that not changing anything in the process is actually the best way. Splitting the window or what others said having a "Priority Deadline" or making a rule that only trustworthy devs can do late merges etc is just making the system more complex. It's slippery slope to a system where there's so many rules and regulations that you can't do anything effectively. Not to mention make it nearly impossible for new people to enter because they have to do an entire Ph. D. just to know how to contribute. Keeping the rules simple and as few as possible and forcing the people to realise the rule intention not simply follow them ad-literam is the best way, though not immediately obvious, as it will take time to get to be common place, and I guess that you'll always have cases where people don't understand and do the wrong thing. Because, you know, there's a reason the window is 2 weeks and not 2 days. Thing is, people contributing are smart enough, they can certainly understand these things too without the need to excessive "perfect" regulation where it has to be stated extremely precise, down to the last detail. Having a more lax system is more flexible.
    2
  623. I think he's doing it because he cannot help himself to not troll. While trying to influence what he shouldn't. The brands he's destroying is just an opportunity for him to buy very low, until he stays low for a while, does something neat and the brands bounce back to their previous valuation. He's the best pump & dump schemer in the world (or at the grandest scale).
    2
  624. Don't remember exactly if he has a video exactly for that, but he does have an entire series of configuring emacs.
    2
  625.  @HentaiWarhol  What the hell is wrong with you people ? Why do so so many people get SO triggered over somebody pointing out grammar mistakes (in a polite fashion, mind you) ? It's actually doing them a favor, showing them a mistake so they're aware of it and can correct it. How do you know if the original poster simply did a typo and doesn't care about it, or genuinely didn't know the correct spelling and now is grateful that he learnt it ? Critique is good and healthy (of course, politely and in moderation). It's allowing us to improve ourselves. The only people you don't critique are those who you truly don't care about in the slightest, and/or that you don't want to ever engage with. And before you say it, yes grammar is important. In written text that has the potential to be read by hundreds of people or more, grammar is very important. If left unchecked, people will gradually start to write more and more wrong and the potential of not understanding what they are writing or, even worse, incorrectly assess what was written increases. No, not everybody that tells you of a grammar mistake is a pedantic grammar nazi that has nothing better to do. If it's only the private conversation between you and your buddy, then, yeah, write in whatever style you want.
    2
  626. There are many programs and scripts that use curl, not just browsers. Still not even close to critical. Which puts a shade on actual critical bugs and security holes.
    2
  627. That is interesting. Do you have a "why" disclaimer ? Including what other OSs are doing that isn't covering your needs (BSD, Haiku, dare I say, Serenity, what else am I missing ?) ?
    2
  628. Why this specifically ?
    2
  629.  @jakeadams4621  The thing is that with buttons and knobbles you can get to know them by muscle memory and use them without even looking at them. Which, for me, is a massive plus. Which won't happen on a touch screen.
    2
  630. That is one of the core things of Linux. It's as customizable as you want! If you want and like something, that you get it and use it. Nobody can tell you what to do.
    2
  631.  @t3dotgg  But you can do both (though I'm ok with just having the long videos, since I like understanding the context and nuances). That is, AFTER you do the initial video, with all the details, you can make a summary video, a more distilled take. There's things that can be taken out like the chat interaction and tangents and the time it takes to write and compute. And you can make corrections too. Now, if you have the time and mood for a summary video, that's another topic. But it is (at least theo-retically) possible and not pointless.
    2
  632.  @Firestar-rm8df  Ok, I've been a bit of an ass, true. On the multi vs single threaded part, Redis can handle quite some requests, though, of course it does have a limit. And for using something like a Threadripper, you can use multiple instances. Might not be something very easy to do, if you already have an app, or have very specific data requirements, but in most cases this can be used, so you can have both blazingly fast™ response times and lots of users/data. Still memcached clearly has its place, if I'm not mistaken it can easily scale to be used on multiple servers at once, as a big pool of TB of RAM if you needed (and not in the sense of individual servers that are copies of a main server, neither manual sharding as I suggested with Redis)
    2
  633.  @Tynach  Fair enough! Thank you for the extra explanation. I was speaking more about the principle of checking every thing before implementing, but if it's a standard hardware feature like you say... then I can't say much in their defense :))
    2
  634.  @terrydaktyllus1320  Whoa there, you went on a full rant when it should've been only the first paragraph. It was handicapped in a sense that it had limited functionality and a slow system. That he himself was clearly not happy about it. This was from some time ago when he had a call with Brian Lunduke. Even finding a laptop and a webcam was hard. He said it himself that it was quite the hassle. Because (well, at that time) basically all laptops less than 10 years old had Intel Management Engine (that's the name IIRC) installed and only old laptops didn't have that. Also in that call he mentioned that he has no cell phone (neither "smart" or "dumb") because it's basically a tracking device. He would've liked to use one, if it was actually free. Same as with a good modern laptop. He had to specifically search for that configuration it didn't simply "worked for him". It was the bare minimum acceptable, because he doesn't compromise on freeness of his devices. I didn't attacked him in any way, I don't know what got you so triggered.
    2
  635.  @chill89892  Yeah man, you know you have to count when you use a grenade, that makes it a great unit of time. Grenades ago could mean 30 seconds ago :)) Jokes aside, I think he just made a typo
    2
  636.  @burgerjointgame  Well, better late than never! It's a bit sad that the claimed things aren't actually sustainable (who wouldn't want to travel in an actual Hyperloop and go from London to New York in like 1 hour ?). But better be a bit sad than to be shocked when you realize it was a conjob all along. And that you actually spend money on that.
    2
  637. Wait, aren't...errr weren't Sono Motors the ones from Germany, making cheap EVs ? They're gone ? :(
    2
  638.  @justin_time  Yeah, that cascade of issues is why governments are usually afraid of slowing the economy. And, yeah, I heard that the energy prices are a huge problem now in DE, and were for a few years, and that the industry was hit hard. But I also heard they have a lot of solar that's waiting for permits and in general to be connected to the grid. I really hope DE gets to sort the energy problem, without massive imports of fossil fuels.
    2
  639. It shouldn't fully flop. There are use cases, like short-medium range hauls. And not everything is very heavy, toilet paper and other such things need to be carried too. So for low weight high volume stuff, the Tesla Semi should be actually decent.
    2
  640.  @khenn800  To be fair, Cybertruck has innovations too. Too bad it's put and shaped into a very st00pid product.
    2
  641. Pfff, that millenial... of all the platforms it can play games on, he had to choose a Macbook.
    2
  642. gif is really niche nowadays, only usable for small simple images or small simple animations. And the animations part wasn't the topic of this video.
    2
  643. Or just display a pear with a bite.
    2
  644. But if he doesn't have these old games, what can he do ? Just install it, boot into it and ... edit a file ?
    2
  645. Coolest idea in these comments!
    2
  646. Exactly!
    2
  647. Other than not being the fastest and the most efficient, I'd say nothing!
    2
  648.  @justanothercomment416  Yeah, I was curious if you got it in the PHP 5 or 4 or even earlier. Since 7 and especially 8 it is much better, stable (also decently fast, for an interpreted language) and has strong OOP features.
    2
  649. I knew that red shirt guy is up to no good!
    2
  650. You can dual boot on the same drive, but it's a hassle. Updates will wipe the bootloader and you'll have to manually remake it. So rather that set you up for headaches (or worse, lost data, not to mention time ... or sanity) I think it's only normal that most distros simply don't have that option in the installer. It will only do harm.
    2
  651. I'm sure that it become a topic because many people suggested Linux to be used.
    2
  652. "Why haven't you asked your community to send you their attempts" - I think for this case, he should've only asked for tips, not for the actual website. If someone actually want to do it, he/she would say so, no need to ask.
    2
  653. But what other channel has videos on this topic ? I'm actually quite curious of how Argentina is doing. I wouldn't have come here if somebody else made the video :(
    2
  654. MrStealMahBeef Exactly! AMD's silence prior to the extremely late annoucement and afterwards speak volumes about the care for the customer.
    2
  655. Wait, what ? What did FreeDOS do ?
    2
  656.  @aqmohra4  Historically speaking, many, many, well, most connectors were not done to accept either way (lacking the specific word...). Anyway, in this case I'd say it's the people using the connectors who are more stupid than those who designed them.
    2
  657. Real Linux users only use ed
    2
  658.  @_Daio_  Yeah, though surely not as bad. We won't have a pandemic to slow supply and shipping and we won't have ANOTHER shot up in demand because suddently everybody is at home.
    2
  659. In case you don't know it already, you should check out Serenity OS. Seeing it develop is quite nice (the creator posts videos from time to time with him working on various aspects and has a monthly presentation of what things are new. While it's still far from being a ready to use OS, it's also already quite feature rich, given that the project is only several years old. And it has its own browser. And they recently started to code their own programming language.
    2
  660. English isn't your native language I assume ? (Actually asking, not trying to be mean). It's a 100% increase in build time. But things like performance, like speed, are not measured directly in seconds but in something done per second (or other unit of time). They both answer to the question "how fast?". Using the same analogy, if doing a lap in a race now takes you 2 minutes instead of 1 minute, your average speed is halved, do you don't say "100% speed degradation" you say "50% speed degradation". Also, why I asked about native language skills. Degradation means something is worse, it implies reduction. So when you somebody says that something degraded by 80%, you know it's now at 20% of what it was before (not 180%). A 100% X degradation means there's nothing left.
    2
  661.  @BrodieRobertson  I was trying to make a joke about "Anarchy in the UK" - a famous Sex Pistols' song.
    2
  662. What's wrong with GPLv3 ?
    2
  663.  @marcasrealaccount  I don't see it as restrictive. It is restrictive for a categories of people which I don't care much about, because they care more about greed.
    2
  664.  @jerry2357  Oh, yeah, definitely. Servicing one truck per day is... not great :))
    2
  665. What project ? Is it going good ? Making progress ?
    2
  666. Lame. Lame joke.
    2
  667. Regarding the strategies of this video, you can do all of them at the same time.
    2
  668.  @ChaunceyGardener  "The only thing missing is the condescending tone of Linux communities" - that's the real loss.
    2
  669. It totally is just you. Do you have extensions ? Maybe they're interferring or something. Does it happen with Firefox too ?
    2
  670. I'm on the side of people freaking out. The thing is, Ubuntu/Canonical, have done bad things on this "topic" before, so them "teasing" r/linux is truly poor taste. That is, I can accept this sort of joke from someone that has spotless background/history on the matter. If you don't have a spotless history on the matter, then you joking about it is totally inappropiate, you don't know to read the room, you deserve all the backlash so you learn to behave. When you do something stupid, you do not remember people about it!!! So, even if it was an acceptable joke, there's still the problem that there's no place for a joke there. I'm human and I do have a sense of humor. I can accept a joke here, in VERY VERY rare occasions for EXCEPTIONALLY good jokes. Which is totally not the case here. The thing is, these people putting this joke, they think they're funny, but they don't think of the impact. Several weeks or months down the line, when I'll upgrade my sister's computer, seeing the joke for the 34th time is not only not funny, it wastes space on my terminal, wastes energy to my eyes to go past it, wastes brain cell cycles for me to understand that it's there and that I have to skip it. It's pollution. I think the problem is the goldfish attention span syndrome that seems to be more and more pervasive on the current society. We are not able to be focused on one thing anymore. Like to get into the mindset that you have something to do and for the next 5 minutes, 1 hour, 8 hours or whatever, only think, interact and do think exclusively about that, and nothing else, so you're as efficient and productive as you can be. Sure some people or areas (especially creative/art) can or want all sorts of extras. But that shouldn't become the universal only-way to do/have things. It should be the individual adding the extras, not the provider to come with them. It's like now an action movie can't simply be an action movie. No, it has to have a comedic relief character and the main character must also have a love interest. It's not something bad if a movie has all 3, but it should be the exception, not the norm. There are places for jokes and comedy, I'll go there when I want jokes and comedy, stop polluting all other areas with unneeded (and rarely good) funny, that's not the reason I'm here. In conclusion, this particular act is certainly of very small degree and by itself shouldn't cause much rage. But it shows a fundamental lack of understanding from those at Canonical, and as such, everybody expects them to continue on this stupid path, unless someone tells them to not do that. So, that's why the rage is justified and actually needed right now, so they learn that it's not ok and they stop, BEFORE doing something truly stupid and distruptive.
    2
  671.  @nunyadambidniss  I don't see how your answer has any relevance to what I said.
    2
  672. It's the idea of having sense, in general. If you see people doing wrong stuff, you should be bothered, to a point, especially if it impacts you (more) directly. In this case, the main point is that installing into a VM and spending mere hours on a distro is not a review. And I'm totally down with that, it should be called out so people doing these "first impressions" don't label them as reviews. Having proper terms, that is, terms that are not ambiguous and/or that people all generally agree upon make for better, more efficient communication. For example, I might've heard that Fedora is a really good Linux distro. Now, the nuance is that if I'm perfectly happy with what I have right now, I might only want a quick look on it, to know what's it about, to see why people call it great. Unless it blows my mind, I won't switch to it, so I don't need many details, including not needing if it works just as well on real hardware or how it is after a month, since I'm not intro distro hopping right now. However, if I'm unhappy with what I have now and I'm thinking "hmm, this is not good enough, I should try something better, what would that be?" - well, in this case, I would like a review. Something that will give me extra details that make me aware of things I should know in order to make an informed, educated decision. I don't want to see a first look, install it, and after 1 month realize that this isn't working, as nice as it looks, I need to hop again. Here a review (long term or "proper" or "full" review however you want to call it) is something that probably would give me the information in 20-40 minutes so I can skip that 1 month and go and install directly what I actually need.
    2
  673. I wouldn't say it's ridiculous. Not all new chips really need to have support for all the instructions that appeared. At least theoretically, having fewer things included (or, to rephrase it, to remove things that aren't really needed) will make the chip smaller, cheaper and more efficient. In practice this might be on the cents level but, hey, I still say it's a decision that Intel or whomever should be allowed to make. In ARM-land, it's like making Cortex-M0 (which is REALLY barebones) chips. Those are still manufactured today.
    2
  674.  @TheRedFoxDoesStuff  Ooh, sorry, my bad. But isn't Ubuntu also shipping non-v3 ISOs ? I thought they only offered that as an extra option. Though come to think of it, I think Fedora also did something like this and without the non-v3 part. Frankly I'm baffled why is Fedora so recommended for new users. To me it seems a distro for people which already know what Fedora's limitations are. Which are quite subtle. Anyway, rant off.
    2
  675.  @alexatkin  A few days ? Doesn't it have to be off for a month or so, for this to happen ?
    2
  676. If it's at the detriment of the others (aka in a skill based online match) then the cheater(s) are the immoral and emotionally immature one. Unless, of course, literally everybody cheats and it's something known and expected. But if it's not.... sorry to burst your bubble.
    2
  677. Ha, that's brilliant!
    2
  678. Very well articulated and concise, good video.
    2
  679. I don't get it, what's the incompatibility between "distro reviews are boring" and doing a react video ?
    2
  680. It's not mentioned in this video, but I would like to add that Gentoo is also blocking AI made or AI helped contributions. Though they reserved the ability to have exceptions, just in case. But this isn't because of creativity and stuff like that, it's just about the ethics, moraly and licensing part of it. They just don't want to have to deal with a potential giant mess later. And I couldn't agree more on that stance.
    2
  681.  @BuggiEU  What have phones have to do with this ? Look at Zen 5. And all CPU launches before that.
    2
  682. @dodgsonwevegotdodgsonhere9970 Yes you do. More than the people who don't. WTF
    2
  683. Isn't turning off the display still better ?
    2
  684. Except that ... it's not ?
    2
  685. But after rereviewing it, isn't it normal to at least recompute the severity ? Isn't having a 9.8 high critical issue which is barely a problem in reality, make the whole system much less trustworthy ? I see this as a massive problem that even after an appeal was made, the severity is still so wrong. They should care a lot that if an issue is marked that high, people SHOULD fear and panic and do their best to patch/update/fix the issue. If we get to a place where "oh, a 9.8 severity issue appeared" and the response from the people that should be concerned is "is that ACTUALLY 9.8 or is it like that stupid integer overflow on curl?" then you have a massive problem in your system. Like that anecdote with the boy crying wolf.
    2
  686.  @ViniciusSilvadaCruz  Technically, I think Lunduke is a millenial. And Richard Stallman would be a boomer. Doesn't matter much though. That being said, I fully disagree.
    2
  687.  @sdwone  Yeah, no problem doing that. It's not me who decided that the kid should go there. Also, by "that kid" do you mean Suleman Dawood ? Can't tell it to his father - he died with his son. Her mother also knew how risky it was and originally she was supposed to go, but eventually gave her ticket to her son, as he too wanted to go. At the end of the day, it's something very risky no matter what. And people do make mistakes. So I hope that they took the decision knowingly. From what I saw on Wikipedia everyone going had to sign an agreement that they know it's experimental and that bad stuff, up to and including death can happen.
    2
  688. *their
    2
  689. I don't understand, uses binary packages ? As in, it doesn't compile ? Why is it based and touted like Gentoo then ? I feel it totally misses the point. Not in a bad way, but in a "has nothing to do with" way. Also, why the hell was updating so slow then ?
    2
  690. What the others have said, except that this totally does not scale. For more people that need to transit and/or at smaller costs, the subway is the clear winner.
    2
  691. If you'd be in the industry, you'd understand everything perfectly clear. Really, it's neither vague nor incorrect in the context. Very slightly can be considered inflammatory. But that doesn't detract at all that Linux is very very poor fitting for their needs.
    2
  692. But is it dynamic across different resolutions ? That is, can you define it to look good on all resolutions without using multiple definitions (aka using media queries) ?
    2
  693. @obvious_humor You can certainly hate the player, when he's not doing something for survival, but it does affect other people who have nothing to do with the game, in a game completely made by humans which is also constantly changing. It's true that foreseeing an increase of GPU prices is not something that a normal person is capable of, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be touched. A fraction of people actually use GPUs for work and these people have every right to be mad at miners (and DRAM prices going up). Also, Rudy Sal 14 question of "why mine on a card made for graphics" is a direct reponse to your "what is the point of a GPU, if not to process graphics?". How could you miss this one out ???
    2
  694. Weeeell, technically they'll be much more assaulted by unconfortable questions and later demands and pressure from the big corporations asking for exceptions, pardons or results. So it's not THAT easy for them either. Still, nowhere near facing unpaid bills, hunger, cold, lack of medicine and so on.
    2
  695. Since input was asked, please, let me (I also posted this on Luke's video): Gemini and Gopher are a total waste of time and effort (and quite stupid because of that) since they offer absolutely nothing that HTTP doesn't have already. Site owners who care about that can simply make their websites in a clean HTML. Yeah, HTML is a bit more verbose, but it's not that atrocious. An HTML equivalent of what DT showed in gemini would be less than half of what he showed as the source HTML code for distro.tube . Surfers who care about that can have javascript (and other things) disabled and only enable them by default as needed (corrected in the edit). I will concede that the browsers nowadays are doing it wrong by having everything enabled by default. If anything, all the effort should be in making a nice, easy-to-use interface for modern browsers to have everything disabled by default with easy toggles, like a checkbox in the status bar or something for enabling JS, external JS, cookies and so on, if you deem that you'll benefit from it. Change my mind!
    2
  696. Because it was a rather badly made example. You only need a <select> for the country prefix, and then the input, with a placeholder (a very-supported HTML input attribute) to show the format. Really easy, actually. And actually very usable without JS, unlike some other form validation hints that still DO need JS.
    2
  697. 3:55 WRONG 2560x1600 or 2560x1440 is NOT "2K". Not even close. I can't wait for this misinformation to die out. STOP USING 2K as a resolution name. 2K is 2048x1080 or 1920x1080 (and a few other variations close to these resolutions). Even without this information, knowing 4K and 8K would induce that 2K should be 1920 horizontal pixels, not 2560.
    2
  698. Well, at least it's in the name :))
    2
  699. There is one contender, if I'm not mistaken. Librem 5 is the brand. They have a phone that runs on Linux (instead of Android) and on which you can install most normal desktop/laptop Linux apps. The phone & the OS are still kind of in beta stage. For example the phone doesn't have cameras yet. And has quite old CPUs. The not-so-nice (yet) part is that the phone costs $800. And they have a version, which, if I'm not mistaken, is entirely made in US, by US companies. That one costs $2000. Yup, two thousand US dollars. So.... yeah... there's this one on the horizon, but it's not yet good enough for daily use and it's MUCH more expensive (especially given the phone specs)
    2
  700. And less time parsing code that is not used
    2
  701. Quality content my ass. Maybe on other video clips because for certain this one does not have quality content, just blowing up Musk into stratosphere hype. The Loop in LA didn't cost $10 million, but $53 million, was late, it's WAAY short of the 4400 passangers/hour for at least 13 hours/day and it doesn't have fully autonomous pods, but normal cars with drivers (which, btw, means significant extra running cost, as 62 drivers is nothing to sneeze at). Yeah, it was cheaper than that NY subway tunnel, but we're totally not comparing apples with apples here. The LA tunnel is the smallest it can be and has absolutely 0 (ZERO) safery features. No ventilation, no space for pedestrians, no exits, no fire dispensers, no bypass lanes/tunnels. I can't wait for a simple car breakdown to happen and to see all the Musk fans coming up with excuses that he's still a genious, even though his solution a) totally does not solve traffic and b) is inferior to subways.
    2
  702.  @DemPilafian  Yikes!
    2
  703. "To determine once and for all ..." Yeah, lol, no, not even close. The results are so flawed, I'm baffled that they were presented in the first place. That Zig solution had a lower number of passes than the Rust solution, because it ran on half the threads (1 per physical thread, instead of 2 per thread like the rest) and it got divided by 16 instead of 32. And I don't see the issue of having SIMD enabled for Rust and Zig but not enabled for C and C++ being addressed. There's one thing that this shows very clearly: getting an objective list of the fastest programming language is impossible. Different languages might be better in different scenarios. Also, like it was said, especially if you know the target system and if you REALLY need performance, assembly is the one to go. Zig, Rust, C and C++ all very good choices as well. Java too (was not that surprised to see it there), though for some (me) it's ugly AF, I'd rather struggle with assembly than Java. But for corporate projects Java is very welcomed.
    2
  704. He used the average of 2625 req/s (aka half of the peak of 5250), but yeah, that still amounts to $28k, effectively 10 times more expensive.
    2
  705.  @Marlow925  Nice to see your civil conversation with F T :) However, I feel the need to add that the tunnels here are very very small (hence the lower cost which a lot of people sees it as a miracle when it isn't). Check at 1:41 how big the tunnel is. What's that 3 meters in the highest point eg the diameter ? No bus can enter that. And I don't think you can add longer cars either since they won't fit at turn. So... yeah, this sistem was not planned to be upgraded at all. Another small thing that I didn't saw anywhere... these cars have to recharge their batteries. So you have to make spaces for rechanging and logistics for making sure they won't all need to recharge at once. A non-existent problem for subway trains.
    2
  706. Well, HoMM 4 of course! Such underrated gem.
    2
  707.  @joeyvdm1  "Zen3 will also have 8 core CCXs on top of the IPC improvements" Uhm... the IPC improvement already includes that. To rephrase that, a part of the IPC improvements comes from the 8 core CCX.
    2
  708. I don't know, the menu style, is interesting, but I can't shug the feeling like something is off with it. I don't know if it's the color on highlight on the side or something else. I can't say I have an idea how to change it though. But I have to say, I am really pleased with all the info and tips baked in so somebody new can still pick it up in no time. That's a lesson that many devs can learn! Kudos to the instantOS dev for that!
    2
  709. I third that!
    2
  710. Yeah, like Pablo said. I don't like Musk either, but right here you're strawmanning him.
    2
  711. 7:10 "Obiviously a lot of arch-based systems are picking up a lot of steam" - I see what you did there, nice^^ Edit: yeah, I see that quite a few others saw it too, ignore me.
    2
  712. That shows that he still either didn't learn anything or that he's still very willing to lie to his teeth for a nice lump sum of money. I wish the academia would single him out for making such a bad image of academics.
    2
  713. Oh, so this isn't about network transparency ? That's good, I guess.
    2
  714. Yeah, that triggered me too. So confidently wrong :))
    2
  715.  @Level2Jeff  If you have the time and curiosity, can you limit the CM5 to the power draw of CM4 ? And test if it's still faster (and thus, more efficient), given the same thermal constraints ?
    2
  716. Question, if anyone tried: with something like an R9 7950X, maybe even with 64-128 GB of RAM, would running Gentoo (and compiling in RAM) be viable ? Assuming of course that you don't have a problem learning and setting all the USE flags and so on. I'm just curious if at this performance the compiling time issue is finally something that is no longer a concern.
    2
  717. Well, then the whole 5th-9th gen would actually be ... 4th ??? gen ? But. yeah. recently the differences are smaller and smaller. Though I have to admit, I was very surprized with the power efficiency for 9900K. Not sure it's enough to call that a new gen though...
    2
  718. Soooo, HTML stands for Hyped TypeScript and Markdown Libraries ?
    2
  719. lol
    2
  720. Why doesn't the start_radio function also have the pkill and the mpv commands in it ? With the URL sent as $2 ? It would get rid of so many lines.
    2
  721.  @D.G.M.  Because repackaging Chromium is really easy and low effort ? While still being on the same exact domain, so to speak.
    2
  722.  @BrodieRobertson  There's this ... let's say feeling, since I'm not so sure exactly how factual it is, but the idea is that Lunduke is apparently about the only one digging and reporting on all sorts of these issues. These foundations seemingly got more and more corrupt and woke trying to censor what they don't like. And also he apparently is banned from a lot of them, and even banned to be mentioned. The uptick is that if you do find that his investigations are good, you could mention that he also covered the topic. In these clown-world times, this is needed. And it would also show that you're not under some control. Then again, people and fundations having a problem with Lunduke might start having a problem with you if you give him even a modicule of publicity. Speaking of, if you feel bold and crazy, I would really enjoy a clip / take on this whole Lunduke situation. It's history and current status and how you think this whole situation is, how split the whole bigger Linux and FOSS community is about him. I personally started watching him recently and he seems genuine, but it's still early to be sure about that. And the things he's reporting on... not gonna lie, they kinda scare me. Linux foundation having a total of 2% of its budget reserved for Linux and programming, and 98% on totally unrelated stuff, that thing can't be good long term. It seems like all of these fundations, being legally based in USA, have a systemic problem of being infiltrated by people who do not care about the product(s) that the foundation was based originally on. If these aren't course-corrected, or others arise that are free from all this drama, I truly fear for the future of Linux and FOSS in general.
    2
  723. They can still be a deterrent factor.
    2
  724.  @rameynoodles152  Couldn't agree more!
    2
  725. But the devtools has "Edit and resend" on the network tab. SOOOOO useful
    2
  726. Agree, now it's the norm to include lots of stuff, for a fraction of what they offer. And what's worse (and why it's not easy for the developers to fix this) is that if you want to NOT use an off-the-shelf solution, everybody jumps on you that you "want to reinvent the wheel", then bury you in insults and make you have trainings so you learn what code reuse is and how much more efficient and maintainable is. I know, not reinventing the wheel is a perfectly fine advice. Somehow some creatures that have more buzzwords than common sense decided that it's not an advice or guideline, but gospel, and it will be the better solution in all aspects 100% of the time. God forbit for you to actually use your brain a bit, exercise some barebones JS and write 2-10 lines of code, instead of getting YetAnotherPlugin. Same for code reuse. If you have 2 lines of code that are the same in your code base, you must stop working on actual useful stuff and refactor your application (adding 10-100 lines of code, maybe a couple of files) so that one line is not doubled anymore. Just great /s Not to mention how souless, disgusting and mind-numbing is to simply search, install, configure and maybe tweak a bit (mostly so they fit together) modules only. That's not programming. And, while more economical in some to most situations, it creates people who programmed too little and are not proper seniors. Sigh
    2
  727.  @LeiosLabs  Isn't the cancel culture a left thing ? People who worked very well for a project for YEARS and suddenly got pushed out of it (sometimes that being their own project) because "not fighting for trans rights is transphobic" ? I'm not saying there's not a lot of rotten right wing people or that there's no normal left people, but you can't say that it's only a problem with the far right and that somehow these kinds of exagerrated actions aren't a problem of the left.
    2
  728. And not to mention how bad the AI is (or was, haven't checked in months what's new in Civ 6). And seeing the almost-non-existant difference between 8700 and 8600 means tells me that they don't even multithread properly. Such weak realease this Civ 6 was, quite sad. Despite some of it's very good improvements.
    2
  729. Serious criticism: if you want to make a point, don't making fun of the actors. Do either one or the other, not both, in the same video (or audio or text or whatever) In my particular case, I just can't get over how annoying and stupid, to me, saying "Motzilla" or whatever that pronunciation would be spelled. I can't focus properly on the subect at hand because I keep getting triggered by this stupid thing. You can say, I'm the one being stupid, and I can't objectively counter that. But it is counter productive, there's nothing to gain with that making fun or whatever that mispronuciation is meant to be.
    2
  730. 200-300 what ?
    2
  731. Was this really this year ? I swear I've seen this talk years ago (like when the pandemic started). The examples are mostly the same. And worst of all, it's still "accordians" instead of "accordion" AAAAAAARRRGH my brain melts. Edit: I remember the browser support slides. One of them was wrong. Which it seems has been fixed since. But they still completely lack what they're about. I mean, she is speaking what it's about, but it's really basic accessibility to have it written on the slide too, to have something like "Browser support for :has pseudoselector" as a title above the browser icons. Other than that, I like the examples provided. Of course the idea is to remove or reduce JS where you can, not to fixate on buliding full websites completely void of JS. I mean, that's a thing too, especially for those that are nuts about security + privacy and disable JS by default on the websites they visit.
    2
  732. Mandatory request to Louis to make a video about Linux's shorcomings for his daily usage. I expect it to gather a lot of (usually) useless advices, like "use distro X, use program Y, use hardware Z", but who knows, maybe something useful will come out of it. And shading (sic) light on the problems might actually make a bump into them getting fixed :) Thanks Louis for the good news and all your work! Cheers!
    2
  733.  @michalthekind  God dammit, not again!
    2
  734.  @michalthekind  Yeah, I saw it. Quite dissapointing. And the missing assets / downgrades too.
    2
  735.  @edwinkm2016  Plz edit the comment
    2
  736. @jJaha Sjsj The performance gain is hard to say because it depends a lot on what you use and the hardware you have. Generally, since you have the use flags, you can customize the apps you install by quite a bit (like removing anything you don't need/use) and also compile them specifically for you processor microarchitecture and with higher levels of optimisations (like O3). In the end you should have lower RAM usage and some things should be a bit faster, but usually nothing ground breaking. It gets better and better the older your hardware is, since the differences between a generic app and an optimized app are much more visible. There's a video on Youtube which is 1 or 2 years old with a guy that installed the latest Gentoo at that time on a 486. It compiled it on another machine, then copied over and booted into it. It was slow (took like 6 minutes IIRC just to boot), but unlike basically any other OS nowadays, it was actually working, with all the modern features. If you're not big into customizing and/or optimizing or if you don't want to learn how the OS works, then you most likely won't find the time investment worthy.
    2
  737. Not sure if sarcasm...
    2
  738. I fully agree with your #4
    2
  739. John Crafton That's what she said
    2
  740. nıce
    2
  741. Was expecting to hear or see some "git gud", but alas no such luck. I guess that borderline funny, overused memes do die after a while.
    2
  742. So many people focus on the resolution when it comes to VR. The resolution just a part in what VR needs to be massively successful, and I think it's the closest to being where it should be. Another thing that it needs is better rendering frequency/refresh rate. That will help with people that get nauseous when playing, and there's still a good bunch of them. Totally out of my ass, but I think it needs to be something like 300Hz to be really effective. Like ca1ib0s said, it also needs 140º FOV. Variable Focus. Eye Tracking with Foveated Rendering. I'd say especially eye tracking. And what Luke said about more tracking in general, so it's not just your eyes that are in the game. Though what we have now is enough tracking-wise for cockpit games. Ultimately VR is an immesion tool. It does enhance immersion, but it also breaks it now, in several ways/points. When these are fixed, and the second generation of hardware&software come for that, it will good&cheap enough to really get big. And it's A LOT of work. HUGE amounts of work, both for hardware and software, to have what I've said above. Not just the graphic card able to run 4 - 2x16K at 120 - 300Hz, but also in the gaming technology to take into account all the trackings. In mere miliseconds. I'd say we're still like 10 years distance to that. On the bright side I have about 10 years in which I'll still be able to be productive & helpful to this world. Thank God there still isn't 16K VR porn.
    2
  743.  @SFDestiny  I think it is. Or that they have the same "source".
    2
  744. If you want to be teched by Casey, I hope you watched the last minute or so of the video.
    2
  745. Are you sure they're not a scam ? Seems a bit too good to be true.
    2
  746. Yeah, all of this AI talk. For someone that loves its work, asking to use AI is like asking a gamer to put the AI to play instead of him. That's not .... nice.
    2
  747. Don't know if he switched to something else, but I think it still is Arc. If I'm not mistaken, there's also a new one called Zen that also has this feature baked in, and it's based on Firefox (Arc is based on Chromium)
    2
  748. I'm a simple man, I see a bottle of Pepsi, I press Like
    2
  749. Have you actually watched his video ? Because he totally didn't tell Sabine that her opinion about foundations of physics is wrong. When you see "Science is falling" absolutely everybody goes "foundations of physics, obviously". I'm a bit sad that Sabine didn't properly got Dave's message. You can criticise all you want, but make it about what you know about. Always provide context. And have a bit less click bait in the title+thumbnail for BigBang's sake. "Foundations of physics" and "science" aren't interchangeable. Not even close.
    2
  750.  @InternetDarkLord  Hmm, I don't remember what he said about it. You do have a point.
    2
  751. Why the hell do you have to waste your, and everyone else who's reading this, time with this comment ?
    2
  752.  @ukraniankgb9131  Thanks!
    2
  753.  @crocodile2006  Ok, ok, thanks for that. Sooo, let me quote "Recover up to 70 percent of range in 30 minutes using Tesla’s Semi Chargers". UP TO :)) Also, what numbers do add up ? If the battery is 1000kWh, then 70% of that is ... 700kWh. Charging 30 minutes from a 1000 kW station will give you ... 500 kWh. You might say, well, the battery is not actually 1000kWh, it's less because it needs less than 2kWh per mile. In the video they said 1.7 or 1.8 kWh per mile. Using 1.7 kWh (and we don't know the conditions for that, only that it was a full weight) per mile, in order to do 500 miles we'll need 1.7 * 500 = 850 kWh. 70% of that is 595 kWh. Which is 20% more than the 500kWh that 30 minutes at 1MW. These "numbers match" to you ??? Really, I think that the 70% figure is for the 300 mile variant. Or in a "best case" scenario, where you use much less than 2 or 1.7 kWh per mile, but it's not the average (or anything that you can rely upon)
    2
  754. Gentoo FTW! I like how so many problems/issues are not a problem/issue in Gentoo.
    2
  755. Depends a lot on what games you play. Compelling Bytes here on YouTube has many videos showing how specific games work on Intel ARC. Not all do, but drivers improvements are still coming, so it's certainly looking pretty good.
    2
  756. JS is not a horrible language, the frameworks are. Pure JS + jQuery can be very beautiful. And powerful.
    2
  757. THANK YOU Steve and Gamers Nexus for having the guts to say out loud how useless that intel's response was. Though in their defense, there are a lot of people who jump to conclusions too quick and who would get mad when receiving an honest, to-the-point answer (though negative like "we're out of stock now and we don't know when we'll get back"), but who will be content when receiving a totally useless answer from which they can deduct the same negative answer (or worse). So I can't get mad at Intel for this, but I still hate it whenever I see something like that. Can't wait for the golden era of communication...
    2
  758.  @protocetid  To be fair, x86 has a bad rep on mobile devices because Intel's Atom cores were mostly a flop. For a long time. Either too weak, or to hungry. But I think we're now over this with both Intel and AMD.
    2
  759.  @protocetid  Heat and energy efficiency go hand in hand. If some varies differently from the other, then it's not something x86 vs ARM, but that particular implementation, the manufacturing node used, the IHS, things like that. The software freedoms... well, that's still kind of not something that's exclusive to x86 or against ARM, but something more on Android and iOS and Google Services. Pinephones exist, and you can install everything there. Another (non phone) ARM that is very free is Raspberry Pi. So, it's not ARM's fault that nowadays smartphones are so incredibly closed and spyware. It's Google + Apple + Samsung mainly + the rest of manufacturers. And, yeah, it's true, nowadays the performance is so good, that for normal apps, especially if you don't have so much spyware on it, it's already something that can be easily be done by most CPUs, even very low end ones.
    2
  760.  @protocetid  I think I saw recently that there's a new tablet that's also powered by AMD. It would be nice to have a phone too. Regarding it being powered by AMD... I'd say that the Steam Deck APU is a good chip for that. It is better optimized for low wattages. The problem with phones is that in order to be successfuly, you'd have to have most of the usual smartphone apps/programs on it. And it can be seen on the Pinephone that stuff isn't there yet. I mean, it's not even the apps, the DE itself still needs polishing. On this note, the channel "Switched to Linux" recently did a lot of tests on a Pinephone. Soo... yeah, it would take a while for this to take off, so to speak.
    2
  761.  @protocetid  Actually, TDP is not how much a chip uses, though it's not that far off either. When you don't have something else, and if you don't need/expect good precision, it can be used instead. The thing is that TDP is how much HEAT a cooler for that chip should be able to dissipate. Which if you think about it, that and how much the chip uses should never be the same, unless the chip is literally a resistor. As an example, on AMD's Zen 4 chips, the top desktop ones, they have 170W TDP, but they can consume (without overclocking) 230W in sustained load. Fortunatly, this is one of the bigger deviations, usually the TDP is closer to the actual consumption. Well, PEAK sustained consumption! The chip, if not in fully load, will always consume (much) less. And on short burst, it can consume (much) more. Getting back. Steam Deck is 15W TDP, but it's optimized to run at more like 3-9W. In games like Dead Cells 2 (which is a 2d indie game, pretty lightweight, but still far from idle-like power required) the OLED version of Steam Deck can run for over 8 hours. With a 50 Wh battery, that means that, in average, the chip + screen + wifi + audio, I think without bluetooth, consumes about 6W. Which makes me think that the chip itself is consuming like 3-4 W. Still, given that the Steam Deck has only 4c/8t, that's not exactly high end. Current phone flagships are certainly both more performant and more efficient. Not sure how it competes on GPU performance. A typical phone battery nowadays has 5000 mAh, which, given that the Li-Ion batteries usually hover at 4V (between 3.7 and 4.2), that makes for a battery capacity of aprox 20 Wh. Less than half of what the Steam Deck has. So the Steam Deck's APU (which I still consider the closest in x86 space to what a phone or a very efficient tablet/ultrabook would need) is not that efficient as compared to the current smartphone chips. Though, it is also built on 6nm, while the most recent chips are on 3nm, almost 2 generations newer, which is a pretty big difference. So, overall, I think that on the hardware side, while it will most likely be a setback in terms of performance or (maybe even and) efficiency, I think that if they wanted, both Intel and AMD could come up with a chip for a smartphone that still has decent efficiency and performance, just not flagship level. Now, on the software side, the advantage with Linux ... that is, GNU/Linux phones (Android, technically, is also Linux) is also the control that you get. And, I guess, a bit of compatibility for the software that's made for the desktop. I wouldn't say it's a big demand, unfortunately. Most likely just techies like us, and maybe privacy nerds. Still, it is nice to see how far Pinephone got, even though it seems like what they have is a bit too low end. The chip itself can be very efficient, they don't have a lot of cores or overclocked them or anything, it seems that the firmware and drivers they use or something is still not up to the task. Or maybe everything is rendered with the CPU instead of the GPU, dunno. But the chip itself is pretty common ARM chip with 4 A53 cores, those can totally be efficient. Oh, and good point about Waydroid. Haven't checked it, but from what I remember, you can already run a lot of apps through it. So you can get the best of both worlds with it.
    2
  762. Since PHP 8 or 8.1 you can have named parameters which allows calling in what order you want. That is you can call it array_search(needle: 'php', haystack: 'I cannot believe how good php is today'); Also, basically any editor worth its salt will give you a way to instantly know the parameters of a core function. While it's certainly not great, I still can't understand how people are so stuck into this. It's such a nothingburger nowadays. At most this will contribute 0.1% of a daily hassle of programming. I said this in another comment, if this is a big problem for you, then you either have extreme OCD and/or you should simply quit programming, as you'll have much bigger problems, no matter the language and framework.
    2
  763.  @JeffreyGordon  Uhm, I hope I wasn't too asinine with that jab. I mean, nothing personal. Cheers!
    2
  764.  @jayjohn9680  Uhm, no. And everybody is talking about the peak / best scenario, or with similar effort. What your describing is not. It's like comparing a mediocre new car to a good car that's 30 years old and badly maintained. Of course the new car will be better, but only because the old car was brought into a bad condition. This "loop" can very well get in the same situation where some cars broke and didn't got replaced, some are off to be charged, some are off because the drivers had their nature calls, and lo and behold, instead of 62 cars, you have 15, and you also have to wait 10 minutes to get one, time in which you could've simply walked to the destination without using this public beta experiment on humans that this "loop" is.
    2
  765.  @ern0plus4  Interesting, didn't knew about overlays!
    2
  766.  @spicynoodle7419  The worker pool of Apache, isn't that stuff from literally more than 10 years ago when nginx originally gained popularity ? From what I know it has configurable worker models and they added the nginx-way of doing things, like many years ago, but I don't remember the specifics, like how it was named exactly. And with that, from what I know/remember, it's basically on par with nginx on speed/performance/scalability.
    2
  767.  @rogerfroud300  Don't want to sound as insane as that guy, but having a bigger battery means you can charge fewer times, so when you do that, you can have a bigger break while the car charges. Like having a full lunch. Also, if you keep the same volume and weigh, you'll have a bigger battery, so it might recoup the charging speed, by having more "cells". What I mean is that if this has, say, half the charge rate, but you can have 40% extra cells / energy, then if you do that, you'll have 140% of the original battery, but at half the speed = 70% of the speed of the original one. Still significantly slower, but maybe not a deal breaker.
    2
  768.  @Baumring  Thank you! I'm getting tired of this "there's only 195 countries" BS
    2
  769. Soooo, a couple of questions: - if I have a SSD and a HDD, both of 1 TB and non-NVME, how do I differentiate between them ? - if I install Linux on sdb and later I remove the drive that is now sda, when I boot back into Linux, would it still be sdb, or it would be sda ? How does consistency between drives, when swapping is a thing, work ? Edit: ok, finished viewing the video, this is done using UUID.
    2
  770.  @RunePonyRamblings  I think I can give a definition: when a company creates a program using 90% FOSS for which they pay exactly 0, they add their thing and sell it for big bucks. Or maybe not even sell it for money, simply have it to be used. You wan't to see the source code to remove the telemetry ? Tough luck, proprietary! Add in situations where you have to use that software to benefit from another service for more malice. In all cases it allows a corporation (like, say, a company that resembles one of the longest rivers on Earth) to use FOSS in proprietary products, and without providing neither funds nor code back.
    2
  771. In the java vs JS, I think it's not the security aspect that made it be the standard, but how fast and easy you can code, prototype, learn. Small language, easy to embed. Well, being weak typed helped too.
    2
  772. How do you know it's high ? Do you know how many people live there and what they do ?
    2
  773. #HeyDT, why do you have to be so cringe at times ? 1) 1:16 "According to statcounter a full 71.29% of personal computers around the world are running Windows 10". With 15.44% for Windows 11 and 9.6% for Windows 7 and 2.5% for Windows 8, that's a total 98.83%. Add 0.4% from Windows XP and Windows has over 99% of personal computers around the world ??? Then at 2:36 you basically say the correct numbers now, Windows in total has 76%, and from that 76%, 71.3% are Windows 10. Meaning that a total of 0.76 * 0.7129 = 54.18% of the personal computers around the world are running Windows 10 2) Comparing Windows 11 market share to diseases is just very petty and cringe. You're releasing your hate on it, in the same way that people are getting toxic on social media. It's ok to have this at a talk with some friends when having a beer, but not here, in the wider public. Like I said, it's petty. Making fun of it's growth in a really weird way. Someone coming from Windows and seeing this will certainly not be convinced to switch, it will think all Linux guys are lunatics living in their bubble, making fun of "only 15%" while they have 2%. Other than that, like others said, Windows had this cycle of "bad release followed by good release" several times now, so most likely Windows 11 users will stay low until in 2024 we'll get Windows 12 which will be a refinement of Windows 11, aka it will work very well out of the box. Still with ads and telemetry through the roof, but it won't be so much in your way. And it will be better than Windows 11 in absolutely all aspects and people will then upgrade.
    2
  774. It's about the same as 10700K. People freaked out because IN A NEW WORKLOAD of AVX512 it did consume much more power. But it was about the same in AVX2 workload
    2
  775. LoL, what is wrong with emerge ? 😀
    2
  776. I'm getting more and more amazed at the backlash against Firefox. What is it that people don't like about it ? It works perfectly fine and it has A TON of features. I mean, I would use it even if I didn't care about my privacy and about Google's monopoly and its policies of shoving untested,out-of-spec features down their users' throat using their other services (gmail and youtube). It seems that people want actually for Firefox to die, and I really don't understand why. Yeah, I'm worried about some of the management at Mozzila, getting too woke, but the browser is still perfectly fine, very performant and feature rich. Edge getting more users than Firefox ??? Really ??? Stupid planet...
    2
  777. This certainly looks nice for those looking for jumping ship, or for you to install to your (grand)parents, without much worry that they'll struggle :) I have to ask (every OS video has somebody like this, right?) Have you checked SerenityOS ? It's not ready for daily driving, but is very interesting and, dare-I-say-it, appealing. Also, I know it's much more "hardcore", which might be out of the scope for this channel, but maybe a Gentoo video some day ? Maybe just to showcase a minimalistic setup and very customized apps, with a more streamlined installation (as compared to manually compiling). Even if few would ever use it, knowing that it exists and knowing what's possible should be good education.
    2
  778. How so ?
    2
  779. Me too!
    2
  780. You say that the place you're at pays you ok ? And also allow overtime ? That seems that maybe they actually do care about the service they provide or whatever your part of the job is. Maybe start talking with them of ways to improve the job ? Procedures, helpers, technology, automations, something ? So one way or another it gets better ? Maybe you can't make the work faster, but maybe you can make it more tolerable so more people join or slack less.
    2
  781. Firefox itself, in which you take the massive amount of 2 minutes to disable what you don't like ?
    2
  782.  @HamidKarzai  Fair enough!
    2
  783. Firefox forever!
    2
  784. Just add 60%
    2
  785. This is market share (percent of the market) not market cap.
    2
  786. Well, as an idea, it's not stupid. Choosing to implement it now, when it doesn't make any economical sense, that is VERY stupid. But who knows, maybe in another 100 years we might've developed something that would make it easier to implement. Or we might reach the level of need where the costs are feaseable... though I highly doubt that. Or simply have that much excess energy and prosperity that investing into something like this makes sense. Yeah, who am I kidding, we're never going to reach this.
    2
  787.  @GamersNexus  Maybe you can do a one-time benchmark session to show the difference between Windows and a Linux distro on a single CPU+GPU (preferably AMD one, as I've heard that the drivers there are the very good) when you have some news-free time ?
    2
  788. I think this only addressed part of the questions. The bigger picture for young folk nowadays that didn't got some computer study at school is why would you use them in the first place ? To them, using the terminal for anything else than debugging some system problem is going back to the '80s, like he saw in the movies. I remember an article of sorts with a teacher saying that some students (who only ever used smartphones and maybe tables) didn't knew what files and folders are. You can image now the wide gap from the big full GUI based everything they ran to a terminal-only environment with ... keyboard shortcuts! Yeah, so as I was saying, why anyone would like to use something like dwm, vim or emacs should also be stated. Someone in 2023, who is not nostalgic, who is not old, who is not even a programmer, what would be the benefits. To be frank, I'd struggle to recomment vim or emacs to a non-programmer. It does feel like overkill. Unless maybe they write a lot and could use things like groff and hoff and poff and whatever those are called, where you can have detailed formatting too.
    2
  789.  @monad_tcp  Whaaat ? First of all I don't think Mozilla would have allowed to be bought by Microsoft. Aaand, what's so wrong with Firefox now ? That it needs to die ? I know that Mozilla is .... questionable, but the browser itself it stilll is excellent. Not perfect, but really good. I really don't get all the hate on it. By people who probably haven't even tried it in a lot of years.
    2
  790.  @Fonda-d3x  It's been like that from the beginning 13 or so years ago.
    2
  791.  @mrquicky  Crying in GTX 1060 mobile.
    2
  792.  @Spirrwell  Well, that's weird, I can't see my own reply. If you have notifications on email, maybe you can see it there. I guess what you found now is not the original version, which caused the outrage. The weapons thing wasn't what you said, it was that if you have an event in any way related to Rust, it must have guns banned, something like that. Anyway, thanks for the civil response! Cheers!
    2
  793. You can't really show the client a regex pattern, nor can you expect the browser to translate that. It's up to you, the developer, to show that somehow somewhere. Like using the very-supported placeholder attribute that she totally forgot about. To be frank, most examples could've been done better.
    2
  794.  @javelinXH992  But it's not on that written slide that's shown at 8:10.
    2
  795. I don't understand that part at the start with the cost of delete vs write. Both in CPU registers, RAM and disk (be it solid state or HDD), a delete IS a write. Going over the special case of SSDs which have multiple bits per cell and writing would mean writing all 4 bits, the delete vs write doesn't make sense to me. At least, not in the current compute landscape. And the "store the input so later you can simply switch, instead of delete" sounds like basic caching to me. For consumer hardware, we are both getting more effiecient and not. If you look at smartphones and laptops, it is inarguable that we're getting much more efficient. And in general staying in the same power envelope, though the highend desktop replacement laptops are indeed more power hungry that what was 10 years ago. On the desktop side... if we ignore a couple of generations from Intel (13th and 14th) then the CPUs I'd say are getting more efficient and also staying at a reasonable power draw, so same power envelope. Same for RAM and disks. It's the GPUs that are also more efficient, but have expanded, by quite a lot, the power envelope at mid and high end levels. But I would say that the raw hardware power is impressive. On the datacenter side, 30,000 tons of coal seems quite little. I expected something like 1 billion tons of coal. Funnily enough, a lot of electrity nowadays is consumed in AI. Feels like creating the problem in order to create the solution to me. Waaay too much desperate-ness in getting the AI upper hand is quite a clown show to me. I am expecting more and more regulations on AI as the data used is still highway robbery in most cases, and the energy used is just ludicrous, at least for the current and short-term future results. In the context of having to use less energy, so we can stop putting carbon into air. Lastly on the prebuilt power limits or something similar. I don't know of having such a law, neither in EU nor in Romania where I live. However I do know that there is one for TVs (and other household electronic appliances, if I'm not mistaken) which actually limits the highend TVs quite a lot. Which, frankly, is quite stypid to me. If I get an 85" TV, you expect it to consume the same as a 40" inch one ? Not to mention that maybe I'm fully powered by my own solar panels. Who are you to decide that I can't use 200 more Watts for my TV ? On this theoretical setup, it would generate literally 0 extra carbon. And what's worse, because of this st00pid law, now people are incentivised to buy from abroad, which is worse for energy used (using energy to ship from the other side of the world instead of local) and worse for the economy (EU manufacturers cannot compete as well as those in other countries). Anyway, rant off.
    2
  796.  @ronstux4428  What you said is mostly true, but not complete. Trains also run into each other, or derail from no external human (like someone with a car) causes. In those cases it's the operator's fault.
    2
  797.  @rand0mtv660  I don't agree, unless this VC was done like three months or less before 1.0 release. I'm saying this because growing a software is not easy feat and most of the time you DO lose some features that you had when the project was small, things like performance. Still having performance while being full featured and production ready is not easy. So what I'm saying is that just because bun was fast at one point doesn't mean there was nothing else done to performance later. Hence why I say that everything that bun is now relies on those VC money.
    2
  798.  @theTweak0284  * I write Fortra (mostly F77 with some nice things from F90) due to some libs that I work with, and I have huge respct for anyone who was forced to write in a lang that did not let func or var names be longer than 6 chars.
    2
  799.  @aturchomicz821  The idea isn't that brains make LOTS of power (what is that even supposed to mean ???). The human brain typically consumes 20W of energy to run. And it's much better at doing complex stuff than any processor today. And everything bigger/better than a lower power notebook's CPU consumes more than 20W of energy
    2
  800. Single big High definition ? I'm not sure if all my data can fit into a 1280x720 ...
    2
  801.  @davidgomez79  Did he do that in an official FOSS project context ? That is, in their issue tracker ? Or on their mailing lists ? Or in their discord, if they have one ? Because I don't think he's against the idea of having and debating politics. Just that it should be outside of FOSS projects. To give a very simple example, let's say we're working on the same project, like a browser. It's totally ok to argue whom to vote. The debate itself is not bad / a problem. It is a problem if we're doing that in the browser's discord. It should be in a private channel/platform or in a discord about whom to vote.
    2
  802.  @Maxშემიწყალე  I don't think it's as easy as using a calculator vs doing multiplications and divisions by hand (either mentally or on paper). As you use less of stuff X you only get the basic idea of it, especially junior just learning the field. Then you start only learning the gist of stuff Y, which uses stuff X behind the scenes. Then stuff Z which uses stuff Y behind the scenes. When you only learn about stuff Z in general terms and hear there exists stuff Y, you won't get to know that stuff X exists. That's what I fear will happen, especially for junior, very few will still be curious, while many others will be normal humans, and do the bare minimum, and let AI do the rest. And when the AI will do something wrong, well, there might be a problem.
    2
  803. Finally a normal comment!
    2
  804. Actually I bought my laptop, a beefy 17.3 inch Asus laptop in 2016, and even though it was quite expensive (1500-1600$) it didn't had an SSD, but a 1TB 7200 RPM HDD. I was ok with that, because it has 2xM.2 ports where I can put whatever I want (and I wanted a really good SSD so not having to replace a mediocre SSD was a plus). Of course, Apple has no excuse
    2
  805. I know, right ?
    2
  806. Well said!
    2
  807. That's the wrong approach if you ask me. Talking is imperative. How are you going to find about it, in more details, if you don't talk about it ? Just don't be offended or agressive about it.
    2
  808. More like 0.0003%
    2
  809. Hell yeah! AMD deserve some flak for this. I don't think the reference cooler can actually run at 40dBA with 200 W without thermal throttling.
    2
  810. No, it's clear enough that it's a scam. We should start an indigogo (GoFundMe?) campaign to collect&help&fund all those backers and those that bought that abomination to sue Waterseed into oblivion, so Nancy and Don can finally go and rot in jail as they deserve.
    2
  811. True, though for some, especially in the beggining, seeing all of that is nice. I guess the best would be to have another video to point out that it's exactly as it's there, so this video can focus on the more unique (and important) traits of the distro.
    2
  812. I agree! I'm not a fan of their decisions in general, but I understand this angle, it makes sense. Having different "how to install whatever" tutorial for different flavours would be nuts, that's not a flavour anymore, it's a separate distro.
    2
  813.    Yeah, long term, it does appear that snaps, like other Canonical projects, will get tossed, after the burden becomes too big, compared to the unwarming reception. Unless they really make them stand out. To be fair, they do seem to have some advantages over flatpaks. But downsides too, and ones that leave you with a sour taste.
    2
  814.  @glidersuzuki5572  I said it on DistroTube's video about this. To me at least, a review implies some completeness. Like Brodie said about Asmongold's review of New World. And for games in general, a proper review implies that you finished the game. To summarize it best (I hope) is that if I watch a review about something everything that was not said/presented should be rather impactless details. That means that from the review I can (should) get a pretty good feeling of what that thing is, how it works, what to do with it, what it can't do etcetc.
    2
  815. Or just plain normal infrastructure. Like normal trains that USA so desperately needs.
    2
  816. Agreed
    2
  817. Rabid racist ? Where ?
    2
  818. Well, truth to be told, in a crisis, that is to be expected. Realistically speaking, in a crisis, a good bunch of work types are suddenly unmarketable. So people should expect that suddenly, the society needs something else more. It's up to you if you adapt. I'm not trying to cover Cuomo here. He's absolutely a massive a**ho**. But it should be common sense that you might have to switch (hopefully temporarly) to another job even if you "don't want it", The snowflake attitude will help noone.
    2
  819. Whoa, I mostly agree with the message of the video, but you REALLY need to be more careful on getting the information right. First, Go being a better C++ is... questionable. But there have been other comments and is not exactly my area so I'll just leave it at that. But later, "Java and Javascript are 3-4 times slower". Jeez. Holy crap! Java is like an order of magnitude faster than Javascript. You absolutely cannot put them in the same category. Javascript is interpreted, hence why it's slower. It's on the same page as Python and PHP. You don't create executables in Javascript, you need to run it through a runtime. Not to mention that, like PHP (don't know about Python) it basically single threaded. While Java is up there with the most performant languages if you know what you're doing and if the workload isn't prone to suffer from having Garbage Collection. I remember seeing that on ARM, some highly optimized program was 4% faster in Java than C (which also had a highly optimized version). I forgot the site with the benchmarks name though. Really, this is such a basic and fundamental difference that I really cannot trust anything else you say now about Java nor Javascript. It's almost like comparing C++ with Python. No, just no.
    2
  820.  @NoBoilerplate  But Java had trillions of dollars of optimisations too! That's why I was shocked. If I'm not mistaken Java has about the most advanced (and complex) garbage collection algorithms. And I know the JDK is quite a beast. And I say that as someone who doesn't like Java (and I like javascript, though I kind of hate about all frameworks on it). Of course, there's no ceiling in optimisations. Unless you don't have enough data. And Javascript (unlike Typescript) does lack having strong typing everywhere for example. That by itself includes some run overhead. I guess it's a matter of things like Python having those ML libraries that are basically implemented in C and calling them in Python gives you basically the same speed (for those specific functions). Also like the Falcon framework/module in PHP is basically a collection of C functions presented in PHP which, if you only use them, you're close to C speed. But in both cases, you're restricted to a set of functions. And the language itself, being dynamic, has an overhead of its own. I think that the benchmarks in which JS runs well are just that - cases where the engine already has an optimized solution implemented. Though if these cases are in good enough number, especially for the domain where JS is used, that's good and I think they can be used as representative of the language. But in general I'd go by worst case. I guess I'll just have to up my game on current language speeds. I did a quick search now and I can't say I'm happy with the first page of google's results. To be fair, I did find in there some instances where JS is faster or on the same plane (to say so) with Java. But I'm still not convinced. To be frank, I really don't see something like Elasticsearch being implemented and running as well on Javascript. While on this topic, do you have any good benchmarks sites ?
    2
  821. I wonder if the current harsher economical landscape impacted it. As in, if it were still like in 2018 if it would still have trudged along with the same lies, consuming even more money.
    2
  822. Yeah, that's the thing. I love Firefox, I kind of hate Mozilla. I hope that maybe someone someday will coup back Mozilla from their currently stinky board. Or maybe put enough pressure so they change, but that would have to be substantial and sustained.
    2
  823. @Tristen Grant Well, unless the project dies, I hope that at some point, that isn't like 5-10 years in the future, it will. Otherwise that would be... pretty lame.
    2
  824. taking selfies ?? On a more serious note, taking pictures/videos of the situation might be good later. Also, doesn't the GPS still function ? And isn't there any chance to connect to a satellite or something ? To do an emergency call for example. Or simply so you can be tracked by any means.
    2
  825.  @11Survivor  The context I put it in, is about the culture, the people's ways, tranditions, values, beliefs. In that regard, Napoleon was born and raised effectively as corsican (italian). Him being french is basically the same as someone being born in Germany, emigrating to France, getting his citizenship and then saying that he's french. Yeah, he has the documents, but the region he was born and raised into wasn't converted to french culture yet. If France conquers Corsica today, that doesn't mean that suddenly tomorrow everybody in Corsica speaks and understands french and they all raise their pinky finger when drinking from a teacup. These take at least one generation to have a meaningful change.
    2
  826.  @SmallPotato2313  hue hue hue
    2
  827. In 98% of games now, no. And in, say, 2 years, that might drop to 90% of games. Also, if you like to play at 4K, that can jump back to 100% :)) I'd say that if you can afford that card or similar, get it. Worry about upgrading CPU later.
    2
  828. What did you say ? I can't hear you in this noisy noisy crowd of GTX 10 users!
    2
  829.  @dimalinux  They are not GPL licensed, like the original coreutils are. Which means that all the big firms will eventually make their own versions and NOT distribute the source code, but slowly take over market share, to force you to use them.
    2
  830. It pays itself in 6-12 months money wise or CO2 emmissions-wise ?
    2
  831.  @nilnailscrew4784  Software isn't neccessarily linear in its progress. Even without NVidia's help, there might be a breaktrough, with somebody clever discovering important things and suddenly the driver for a good bunch of generation might be much better, close to/in line/even better than NVdia's drivers.
    2
  832. Hey, I clicked that weird red button that says SUBSCRIBE on it and indeed, there were multiple AJAX calls that were using JSON for BOTH request parameters and response data. Crazy!
    2
  833.  @swanvictor887  Thanks for the reply and extra information, I'll remember it! Cheers and stay well!
    2
  834.  @killistan  why so much fuss about the software ? We have emulators and virtual machines, allowing us to play 8 bit games from different ... everything from 40 years ago. And everything that came after that. Unless you have something really niche or really closed (like apple software or cloud-only software) you shouldn't have any problem. Just as we can install now Windows 95 on a virtual machine, somebody in 2042 will be able to install a Windows 10 in a virtual machine. Sheesh.
    2
  835.  @bstar777777  Oh, ok, haven't seen that video, nor others like that. I've seen some of his reaction videos but they were pretty normal. He was a bit pedantic at times, but I'm pedantic myself, so, uhm ... yeah :D
    2
  836. Thing is (or so I think) that with RISC-V noone will invest in it to bring it to a comparable level of performance with x86, while also keeping everything open. So you'll either have something open, but much behind in performance (which might be totally ok for microcontrollers and SBCs), or with nice performance, but proprietary stuff, so same as now. Intel and AMD have very big teams of top-world-grade engineers in order to get the performance and advancements they make. Whomever else would like to challenge that would need dozens of billions of dollars to invest. And internet collaboration like is done for software where everybody can chip in with a pull request, would surely not work as well for RISC-V. I hope I'm wrong and I'll get to see it.
    2
  837. @Penguin Revolution Can you use something different than flathub ? Yes. Can you use something different than snap store ? No. Case closed. Perhaps you should improve your reading comprehension.
    2
  838.  @louistournas120  I'm the same. I prefer the Win 95/98 theme, though the modern ones have a bit more functionality, which is neat. Also, despite its flaws, you can theme it pretty close to the old ones. At least in Win 10. I can't speak for Win 11, as I haven't tried it, and I'm pretty sure I'll never will, at least not on any computer that I own.
    2
  839. I'm not sure it's the full source code. They mention that the UI is, but is that everything they added on top of Chromium ?
    2
  840. Truly a worthy endeavor! Be sure to check where that pickaxe was sourced!
    2
  841. @Lelouch Yagami and @TheTelePhyzz ever heard of servers ? Do you really thing that somebody (non-stupid) buying a 6900K would get it just for games ? Or casual browsing ? There's things that other mentioned like video editing and software development. Those easily use more than 16GB of RAM. And doing development you might need virtual machines. Anyway, all these are still just for a guy/gal and his/her desktop. Then there's servers. Have a non-trivial website, with mysql and elasticsearch on which you store 100k products and then find out that you need more than 64GB of RAM for optimal speed. That's just one of the extremely many types of server workload.
    1
  842. @Adrian A: These CPUs are for servers aka for companies, not for individuals. I mean, few individuals have the money and especially the need for them. But if you have a moderately big website or application you might already have 2-10 servers. To jump from 10 cores to 16 or 18 cores could be Godsend in those situations. Not to mention that some software apps are licensed per node/computer they run. Another reason to have bigger, fewer servers. Părerea mea
    1
  843. About that IGP removed from KabyLake-X, that's a thing that was requested by consumers (don't know how much though). In the idea that instead of space & thermals used needlessly by the IGP, intel would better just make the CPU better and let the graphics for the actual GPU. I for one I am glad to see that, though the specs I find show 7740X having just 100MHz more base clock and the same 4.5GHz boost clock. Lame. For everything else... yeah, WTF intel. This shows to me that they have NO confidence in their own products. I see no other reason to rush things this much and come up with this extremely lame release. They really are afraid that if they waited 2-3 more months to come with an actual coherent line-up they would somehow lose too much market or something. But I think this poor launch actually helped AMD more than if intel hadn't had said or released anything at Computex. Also, I'm not (...yet..) anti-intel, I'm not on the bandwagon that they are just ripping and milking consumers etcetc, because I don't know for certain if that is true or those money are actually well spent. Anyway, on this x299 launch, they announced that they would allow bootable RAID 1 and RAID 10 for NVMe by buying a 99$ physical key (or something like that). Sooo, physical keys ? In 2017 ? That's so anti-consumer I can't even.... Fuck intel for this thing alone. I hope their value halves and those that are in charge now get fired and end up in poverty.
    1
  844. @Tristan Zipp - That's not exactly a waste. Games that appear say next year will push your card even at that resolution & refresh rate. And also, you don't know when you're going to buy a new monitor :)
    1
  845. What ? No BFG from quake and doom series ? Not even as honourable mentions ? Sheesh... :(
    1
  846. Yeah, Windows 98 added USB support.
    1
  847. Nope, initially it said "tested" instead of "preview".
    1
  848. You know, Witcher has 3 games in 8 year span (2007 - 2015) while TES has 5 games in a 17 year span (1994 - 2011). I wouldn't say TES is just quantity. Both series have an average of one game over 4 years. Also, TES might look like not having enough quality, because the games usually had huge scope, and they didn't got to be very polished. But with expansions and mods they solve that aspect.
    1
  849. +scottiemcnichols Who said anything about "the first" or "the best" ? Those belong to other lists...
    1
  850. Am I the single one that observed the mistake at 1:18 ? The wage gap doesn't shrink from 77% to 6.6%, it's from 23% to 6.6%. Now, who has a math problem ??
    1
  851. Yes! Such underrated games. They weren't very polished or balanced, but very fun and diverse.
    1
  852. Comparing them, a 1994 born band with bands from '60s and '70s in the "aged well" department... get the hell out of here. There's dozens of other bands that deserved more to be in the honorable mention. Not because Foo Fighters is bad or anything like that, but simply because they're too young to qualify for this list.
    1
  853. Have seen Metallica, Slayer, Megadeth, Alice in Chains, Iron Maiden and Rammstein. They were ok, but I wasn't blown away. I also saw Manowar and that actually impressed my a lot, even though I'm not much into them. They're actually better on stage than on studio. I can't say that of many other bands. And I was also extremely impressed of their speakers. It was cristal-clear, extremely loud and somehow I could still talk with my friends and hear each other. That never happened to me in any other concert before or after. I'm a little puzzled that noone (in the first like 100 comments I've read) even had a single mention of them. I guess I didn't had the luck to catch one of the better live perfomances of the former-mentioned bands. :(
    1
  854. @ihave7sacks Yes! Exactly! I bought an ASUS laptop (and a pretty expensive one, ROG 17") several days before this new year's eve. It had Windows and some bloatware, most of which I still have. However it also had Norton Security. I kept it initially because why not ? but I become so annoyed of the constant popups. When uninstalling I remember that it asked me a stupid question TWICE in a row. That's how bad it's UX is. It's like they actually wanted to annoy the user. On the feedback form of why I wanted to uninstall it, I told them that I'd rather deal with a virus. Much less headaches.
    1
  855. +Slayer Wasp can't tell about SC 2, since I only played the campaign... once. But in SC 1, you could do 1v7 on Big Game Hunters. I don't think they reacted at all to what you do/have. And there's many more small issues. It's arguably my favourite game, but I wouldn't include it in a best AI list. NetHack on the other hand...
    1
  856. +Grégoire Basseville I couldn't agree more! How they've missed Zeratul is beyond me...
    1
  857. What is wrong with having a Yahoo Mail ? Sure it got the passwords leaked... twice ? But other than that it's an ok email to use... I think. At least it knows to group emails by conversations, while the Outlook I have to use at work does not (might be old or badly configured but I don't know and I don't care, since I can't do anything about it anyway). Still kinda weird to hear them talk about how creepy the Google marketing will be, but on the other hand say "at least she has a gmail now". So it can be creeped upon. On this... does anyone know if it's possible to have like a paid subscription to google for any/all of their services to be able to use them but NOT track what I do ? Because if they go that hard with that marketing I'm seriously thinking to switching to bing or duckduck go or just simply having a lot of bookmarks. Like seriously, we have too much ads already, could you not expand this cancer this much ? I know it gave me free stuff on the internet, but it really should have a limit. And options for not being involved in it.
    1
  858. Aha, I see. So it boils down to money and actual screen size. But I guess there are pros too: When needed you can run games/movies at 21:9 on the exagerrated-wide monitor, and return to 2x16:9 for the daily usage, all bezel-less.
    1
  859. Ha, didn't thought about that, to check how much actual surface you'll benefit from.
    1
  860. This is a great show :D
    1
  861. As others said, affiliates don't see WHO bought what. At most they get info like male/female, age and stuff like that (if the platform has it)
    1
  862. +AdderTude I actually play like that... almost :)) I simply liked the Deprived and the club more than the others. And I'm still on my first game, haven't finished it yet so no spoilers please about what's better. I do use bows too though.
    1
  863. Nope, your comment is epic fail. Ryzen R7 are in a totally different category than 7700k.
    1
  864. +defiraphi Total Annihilation should have been in the list indeed. But PG and the rest are TBS games not RTS. How can you even mention them ???
    1
  865. +defiraphi Well, about mentioning them because of their influence would be asking too much of WatchMojo :)) I couldn't judge them for this, they're not doing a documentary here. However, I'm curious, why do you say they're the fathers of nowadays RTS ? What would be nowadays RTS (besides SC 2), and what was taken from PG etc ? I admit I haven't played CoH, though surely I'll give it a try sometime. Also, hard missions doesn't seem something popular these days at all.
    1
  866. +Benjamín Marrufo I'm ok with both. What I don't understand how can Tychus be there while Zeratul not even as an honourable mention... WTF
    1
  867. I see a lot of people complaining about "CCR, Deep Purple, ZZ Top underrated ? How ?". Can we all agree that WM forgot to say one thing: "Top 10 Underrated Rock Bands NOW". Most of you remember their glory or airplay they had on their time. But how about now ? Ask folks in their middle 20s or younger about these bands and others from their time. Led Zeppelin ? Yeah, heard of them, they're in all the top lists. Beatles ? Yup, know who they are. Deep Purple ? CCR ? Not so much.
    1
  868. At 1:17, that guy really had to write "Intel" there... Then they went to tell that Kaby Lake is very efficient so they can go with less cooling (when there's so little difference between Kaby and Sky sheesh). Then, as it wasn't enough, they go to tell how fantastic is intel M.2. Nope, I can't take them seriously. Too much intel ass-licking while saying basically nothing. Though the 2 VR systems in one seem cool. Then, the second team, this guy at 2:47 "In 2017 I will be signing every single manual that leaves the company". Why ? Because you'll be selling so few of them, that you'll actually have time for this ? Can't take this guy for serious either. I'm sorry if I look as a jerk and picky but I actually felt like I'm looking at a comedy show more than anything else :))
    1
  869. That was the belief when the war just started, that Russia has the 2nd largest army in the world and that it will finish it in 2-3 days. That was the belief when the russians were 40 or km away from Kiev That was the belief countless times in 2022, 2023 and 2024, yet here we are. Collapsing is a thing, so don't think that Russia can maintain the same pressure for ages. Also in general it's the right thing to do to not let them get away with it. Even if they win, it has been so costly that they won't do it again anytime soon. Otherwise you would've incentivised the aggressors to keep at it, if it would've been easy and rewarding.
    1
  870. Agreed! It's just normal to have peace of mind at those prices.
    1
  871. And how do you do the macro part ?
    1
  872.  @masterg8235  Unless there's something I don't know of (which is why I'm asking), you cannot have a regex that get a source, replace it exactly 3 times, then jump to the next source and repeat. And without that it would be quite some manual work. Not hours, as Mental said, but still not likely to finish faster than he did.
    1
  873.  @no_name4796  I concur. There can certainly be improvements in their communication skills, but I support them doing their due dilligence before approving or adding anything.
    1
  874.  @eemanemm  Nice, thanks for the explanation!
    1
  875. The sane left people (the ones that actually care about actual important stuff) should form a mass and push back against all of this nonsense.
    1
  876. April 2050: JerryRigEverything sues the solar panels manufacturer because the last month the solar panels only produced 79% of the initial rated capacity. The manufacturer retaliates saying that hand (digit?) writing on the dirty solar panels voids their warranty and permanently damages the panel. The rest of the world is befuzzled of why do they care so much ? They're all happy with their 20 KW array of 40 500W 1sqm panels that all costed a total of $2000 and have 75 years of warranty. Elon Musk makes the massive announcement that for the first time, SpaceX will send a rocket to Mars in the next 4 years.
    1
  877. LoL, wut ? What cold british weather ? You mean that around 0 degrees Celsius you get in the winter ? For winter and summer combined, british weather is the best. Not much heating neccessary and not much AC either. Compare that to Spain or Norway or even France and Germany when at least one of the extremes is much worse.
    1
  878. Question: don't you have to completely reinstall it, in order to upgrade it from one major version to another (say, 40 to 41) ?
    1
  879.  @Herby-1620  Ok, that's good to know, thanks!
    1
  880. Fast and Furious is garbage, wtf. Of course it wasn't mentioned. There are loads of better things that weren't mentioned.
    1
  881.  @eugeniovincenzo1621  That's good to know, thanks!
    1
  882.  @Abu_Shawarib  I think that Firefox has that, but doesn't have an option to set the limit, so by default it will use the entire RAM available on the system, then it will start hibernating tabs.
    1
  883. In Valve's defense, I'd rather them not make a new game that totally suck. I think they realized they have no idea for a new game, and rather than just making something for the sake of making it, they stick with what the can actually put value in. While we're at it, despite it's faults, Steam is a very good product.
    1
  884. Same. But he did got it pretty quickly.
    1
  885. This can simply be split with a <select> for the country code, in which you can display the flag of the country and the prefix, and then the phone field with the country-less phone number, using the pattern. The idea with a select + input I've seen it already on some websites, though I can't tell which, I don't remember. Edit: oh, sorry, now I see you mentioned having a dropdown at the end :)
    1
  886.  @giovannisardisco4541  Oh, nice, didn't knew that, thanks!
    1
  887. Holy crap, what happened to WatchMojo ? The production values were really low here, especially given their usual quality. Multiple takes with different volume and above all an ad for their sound channel, that is played at earache inducing volume, compared to the rest of the clip. How can you even claim to have something to do with music when you can't freaking normalize a goddamn 20 minutes clip ? And they have, right now, 23.7 million subscribers. Bloody hell!
    1
  888. I think it is intentional
    1
  889. That removal of single-use plastic is fantastic! Even if a bit more pricey, human effort is something which doesn't produce waste of any kind. With material components like plastic, the waste management has actual hidden costs, which the client buying it currently doesn't pay, but eventually the world will. Thank you Steve for spearheading this!
    1
  890. How to build a GPU all by yourself: 1) take some electronic chips (like PU, memory, VRM whatever) 2) assemble them in some meaningful way 3) add 2 Kg of screws 4) DONE
    1
  891. @Malus Ex Machina what you said makes sense, but in this case it all stops when YT said that they examined the appeal in great detail. They have absolutely no excuse at this point. And they don't seem to be accountable by any means ? Can they be sued for clearly lying in regards to what they do versus what the Terms & Conditions are ?
    1
  892.  @nexusclarum8000  Would you say it's preferably to use C for new projects ? (not being sarcastic, just curious)
    1
  893.  @kingzach74  So glad that I'm not the only one who would be so happy to not have a trackpad at all. I never liked them. And I always take my mouse with me, it's so much better. And for the few times when that's not possible or doesn't work, having the track point is perfect. Unfortunately I think there's too few of us to see that option arise. Unless we're lucky and someone like us really wants that too and knows+has time/money do actually do it.
    1
  894. Sooo, no Ashes of the Benchmark ?? I guess nobody's actually playing it, but I was still a little curious to see if it actually gets some decent FPS.
    1
  895. You over analyze and probably have too much time. Peace geeks ✌
    1
  896.  AileDiablo  They have a plan my ass. It's been 40 years and the lira is ran into the ground, millions of people strunggling a lot because of that. A good plan would've shown its fruits by now, it wouldn't have STILL been in the early stages, at the expense of millions of people's well-being. That's like saying that you'll improve the family's wealth, but your kids will be overworked and starving for their entire lives. But, hey, it will be better after that. That's bullshit. It shouldn't take more than 5 years to see a tangible benefit from a good plan, that people worked properly for. Yeah, Turkey's economy did grew from '80s to now, but it's not enough. And it's not like everybody else didn't grew their economy, without spitting at their people (with some exceptions, of course)
    1
  897. Wow, so many people over here that barely use food delivery. I feel quite special now, I'm kind of the opposite, I actually use food delivery a lot. First thing, I don't think it's THAT bad here in Romania. From the apps mentioned in the video, we only have UberEats a vaguely popular around here. Bolt Food (Estonian Uber that's 2 times better both in car sharing taxi and food delivery), Glovo and Tazz. I basically only use Bolt Food for several years now. Unlike the other apps, I can put the exact pin on the map so the delivery guys (which some really aren't that smart) don't end up on the other side of the boulevard. Also, the prices have indeed gone up substantially. As someone who used food delivery a lot before the pandemic too, the prices are on average a bit more then double (and the inflation here hasn't been THAT bad). One thing mentioned in the video, the difference between pizza chains which have somewhat working delivery and food delivery apps. It painted the apps as the new guy which doesn't have experience and doesn't know how to do things effectively. No idea how it is in USA, but I can confidently say that here with Bolt Food especially that is NOT the case. Just from the accuracy of the estimated time of arrival you realize that the infrastructure is quite advanced and mature. Not perfect, but clearly good. Also, we already have the range limit that it's mentioned in the video that somehow only pizza chains have. Here in Bucharest, which is a very large town for Romania, but it's probably just as big as one small district from New York, the range is about 1/4 of the city. 5-10 km, something like that, I don't know exactly. It is very expensive for me, and I was always aware of that, I still prefer it over spending time shopping and cooking and cleaning and associated extras. Plus, there are days when I literally spend about 1 minute ordering, since I know what I want, about 1 minute answering the delivery guy and getting the bag, and I can eat at my laptop while paying attention to a meeting, effectively I spend no time at all the whole day for "cooking" and eating, I love it. To achieve the same time efficiency and confort I'd have to either a) consume mostly instant foods, which are significantly cheaper, but much less healthier and with much less variety in the foods or b) have a personal chef which would be ideal, but I don't have THAT much money. From several hundreds of orders in the last 5 years I had only literally one order which was not delivered because there was no courier found, on a Sunday at 9-10 PM (don't ask, it was not at my place nor a normal day). And I had several bad deliveries where it was mostly the restaurant fault for not having good wrapping/casing of the food. And several deliveries with missing/wrong items, which were solved (kinda) with the help system of the app. Overall percent wise, not that many, something like 3-5% of the orders. Though there is a thing that I have to mention, I think it does help my good record, I rarely order at lunch times, when there's the most chaos. I usually eat significantly later. Of course, for the end user it will always be expensive. Before the apps, when you had to call, and there were fewer places you could have delivery from, it was worth it if multiple people ordered, like 4+. The delivery tax was a bit steeper, but when you split that in multiple people, it gets quite cheap. And some places had free delivery after a certain threshold. Now with the apps, there's still that free delivery after a threshold (though not always) and the tax seems to take into account the distance, but the efficiency of multiple people (big order) vs single person (small order) has been much diminished. All in all, considering the above points, I'd say that it can get to be mature enough to be sustainable. And I think that I am experiencing that.
    1
  898. There's something that doesn't sit well with me: - the law assumes that the cores have the same performance characteristics. The Macs have different cores, so the estimate cannot be correct. The single core performance isn't mentioned if it's a performance core (which I assume) or efficiency core - why is 12 core estimation of improvement 418%, but later a 10 core estimation of improvement is also 418% ? - why is process creation 1900% better ? Theoretically it shouldn't be possible to surpass 1100% (11 extra cores). Is is just because there's less context switching ? Lastly, I just have to talk about a thing that I see that many do not mention. The Amdahl's Law applies for a single program, more specifically a single algorithm. If you actually have multiple programs, multiple things that have to be computed, those should be basically 99% paralelizable between themselves. Say, playing a game and recording (encoding) a video of it, while also compiling something in the background. These are 3 main tasks, in which going from one CPU core to do them all, to say, 3 cores to do them (one for each program) I expect at least 99% improvement (assuming there's no bottlenecks at, say, HDD/SSD level). None of the programs needs to know what the other is doing, so it has 100% palalelization in theory (of course, in practice it can vary, a bit more if more cores alleviate bottlenecks and less with the overhead of scheduling and with the limitations of other hardware like memory and disk bandwidth) In current day and age, we're not running like in DOS times, running a single program at a time. Usually it is a single main program, like a browser or a game, but there's plenty occasions where you run multiple things, like I said above. Having a browser with many tabs can alone benefit from more cores, even if each tab has only serial tasks in it (aka 0% paralelism achievable). If you also do some coding alongside, there goes more cores. And, of course, today in something like MS Windows, you can assume a core is permanently dedicated to the background tasks of windows - indexing disk data, checking for updates, collecting and sending telemetry, all kinds of checks and syncs, like the NTP/Windows Time, scheduled tasks and soo on. In practice, 8 cores for casual workflows (browsing, gaming and office) is basically plenty, it is indeed little gain from more cores. In that sense I agree with the final thoughts. But I fully disagree with the final thoughts on the server comparison. Virtualisation is not for performance, quite the opposite. If you need top performance, especially lowest latency, you have to go bare metal. Virtualization has two great benefits: sandboxing: you don't have conflicts with what anything else is running on that server, so you can have 10 versions of something with no problem, it's easy to control how much resources it can use and many more. Also, it makes for immediate (almost) identical development environment, reducing devops time and especially stupid bugs because some dev runs PHP on Windows and it behaves differently than the same PHP version on Ubuntu. Also again, thinking in this paradigm of small virtual computers makes your application easy to scale (just have more containers). But an appllication running in a virtual machine or in a container will NEVER be faster than the same app configured the same, on bare metal. The nice thing is that nowadays, in most cases, virtualizing has a negligible impact on performance, while the other benefits are massive. That's why everybody is using it now.
    1
  899. Can't wait to be 80 years old in 2066 and finally able to play AotS at 4k@240Hz.
    1
  900. ​ @Psychx_  The distributed part has to be part of the CVE. Since this is a local problem, you have to really struggle to make it distributed. And I am just pointing that even the original flawed reasonings of why it is so insanely insecure, only mentioned denial of service, not distributed.
    1
  901.  @0LoneTech  LoL
    1
  902. On the boot/shutdown issue.... joke's on you, I only restart my computer about one time per rmonth.
    1
  903. I just want to add that the attitude of "Valve doesn't care about snaps, or your package manager. They don't want to support it. Not their job yadda yadda yadda" is ... not that good. Yeah, they might not like it, but if it isn't fundamentally flawed, as in making it impossible or incredibly difficult, then Valve should consider supporting and working with distributions and package managers, so it can be nicely integrated. That is, the way I see it, the desired outcome for an app that wants to have large reach, to be used by a large mass of people. You can say it's the same as making a FOSS for proprietary OS like Windows or iOS. You can hate the inferior OS (in case of Windows) and the hurdles you have to go to to bring compatibility, but if you do want to have a high reach, then it is something you have to do. While on this, thank you GIMP and LibreOffice. So getting back to the topic, I think everybody will have to gain, including less headaches and issues on Valve side, if Valve worked with the distros and package managers to make Steam work directly from the package manager so you don't need to go and download from Steam's website. That's what cavemen using Windows Neanderthal Technology (NT for short) do. Ok, snaps might still be a headache, though I guess it would be more from Canonical than from the snap system. If that's the only system not supported, it would still be better than now. And I suspect that a lot of this work would be front-heavy, that is, you work hard to integrate it once, then it's easy to maintain after.
    1
  904.  @Lernos1  If you don't pay them because you don't like them, that's ok, that's a valid reason. There can be arguments made both ways, but all in all, not supporting shady practices I guess it's one of them. In this case constantly trying to find alternatives and supporting those to grow and get market share should also be something you do. My response above was to the general mindset of "why pay something you can get for free?". That is, regardless of other reasons. And as if you can't get to know better.
    1
  905. Given Apple's track record, I think you can add to the title the uncertainty of their claim - "Apple makes parts and manuals available to all - allegedly".
    1
  906. So when will Rocket Lake arrive ? If it does happen to have PCI 4.0 and arrives in december 2020, then I think that Intel would be ok overall.
    1
  907.  @dameck9570  You lost me at "And yes, that is what is considered c++ at its peak since it uses the all features the language has to offer". You do know that all 3-digit IQ programmers know that languages and their features are tools, and only use the ones good and relevant for the problem at hand, right ?
    1
  908.  @XPLAlN  While that other guy is a bit obnoxious, your comment is completely void of paragraphs, making it impossible to quickly read it. In other words there's extra (needless) effort required to read it, simply because it's not easy to follow the line when they're long and there's no near visual helpers (like an empty line). Splitting it up would help immensely.
    1
  909. NO - the key surely does not exist (and it's useful as you can skip that level) YES - the key might or might not exist - you have to search. As an example, a father would say "I'm not certain if my son is doing drugs, but I'm certain it didn't travel to China". The bloom filter has situations when it knows for sure the key doesn't exist and can tell you that. If it would be all the time, then it will be a firm YES and firm NO all the time, indeed.
    1
  910.  @ToyKeeper  I heard it is named after the russian space station. Mir is a russian word which means both "peace" and "world". I guess it fits with things like "Unity". And yeah, if this is the case, that it's inspired directly or indirectly by the russian word, it is pronounced like you say, more or less.
    1
  911.  @h2oaddict61  I'm sorry, I made multiple comments in this thread and I'm not exactly certain to whom you're referring.
    1
  912.  @h2oaddict  Yeah, I was responding to Jason M's statement, I quote: "AMD basically has had a single generational increase of 53% IPC" To which I called bullshit (to sum it up). That 53% IPC increase was merely catching up. In multiple generations. Just because they had nothing to offer for 4 years doesn't mean it was a single generation. So this IPC was nothing extraordinary by itself. Mind you, Ryzen 1 IPC was still behind intel's 7th gen. As I said, the problem(s) with intel isn't it's lack of wanting to innovate. I'm certain that they really tried with their 10nm line, but they flopped. I wonder, if intel won't release anything new until 2022 and then (4 years after 9900K launch) launch a new line, which has 53% IPC increase over 9900K, would people be the same "Intel basically has had a single generational increase of 53% IPC" ? No, I don't think so. But it would be exactly the same situation.
    1
  913. I can't believe how many people are glued to their banking apps. I feel like I'm literally the only one that's not an 80 year old tech illiterate that does not use a banking app. By choice. I have all my needs in the web version. Which has fewer features than the app version, but for those I can go to a bank office. I guess I'm fortunate to not have/use a lot of banking stuff. I also only use the physical debit card for payments, nothing on the phone.
    1
  914. I meeeaaan, who WOULDN'T give everything in order to play with a nice pair of boobs ?
    1
  915. Well said! I fear this too, that new people into the field will get to be extremely few
    1
  916. Apparently this was recorded in like august (more or less) last year
    1
  917.  @LucaBertuolo  Come to think of it, yeah, you're right, to "photoshop" is a common term now. Still I maintain that Adobe is not as influential in the grand scheme, so to speak.
    1
  918. They're still overly greedy. And it's not my problem that the made their entire business model around being excessively predatory, unethical and greedy. There are websites which can do just fine to simply showing you the cookie consent on a bar at the bottom of the page, without an overlay/block for the rest of the page. So you CAN use the site before giving the consent.
    1
  919. Exactly! Now excuse me while I go save the planet by asking ChatGPT to do my homework and generate several videos for me.
    1
  920. "of a startup that is less than 1/10th the age of Mercedes" - uhm, Mercedes was founded 97 years ago, while Tesla was founded 20 years ago. "flies off"
    1
  921.  @Hunnter2k3  Good idea!
    1
  922. Oh come on, he meant on separate continents, not necessarily that there's only 3 continents. I mean, I certainly think he's not smart, but that's a minor common mistake that (too) many people make. Not Musk related.
    1
  923. Yeah, certainly there can be modules that act as a mini hub and "offer" 2 usb-c ports. The hdmi + audio jack also sound like a good idea. Or usb-a and audio jack. Especially for the framework 16, that would be GREAT with its 6 module slots. You could go to 8-10 "ports" by using these, which would almost be on par with the well-equipped laptops. Now that I think of, it would so awesome if there will ever be a framework 18. With even more modules. And 99Wh battery. And better cooling. But it's clearly too early still.
    1
  924.  @alomac8976  That slow startup times, last time I watched a video about it, was largely been addressed. Also, if waiting literally 2 extra seconds when you open a program is that much of a concern.... then I feel sorry. The running performance was already on par with flatpaks, IIRC. The other side that xritics briefly mentioned, is that you can have anything as a snap, including daemons, system tools and I think, even libraries. That is, some things you can have them as snaps, but not flatpaks. From what I remember, a good example of that is Nextcloud, the cloud server software - which can be installed trivially as a snap.
    1
  925. I don't think you can do that, buuut, you can simply have another kernel. One purpose built, and another general one, with the mitgations enabled.
    1
  926.  @runed0s86  Armored, big battery, overclockable processor and an m.2 ssd means that the phone will be huge. Like 6 times as thick. Like a literal brick almost. Noone ever will make a series out of that, I'm not sure that it will sell even 10 units.
    1
  927.  @gorak9000  I think you're the confused one. It wasn't the scheduler, it was the filesystem. And btrfs, the slow one, has more security features.
    1
  928.  @bagzhansadvakassov1093  Well, that's what some dork said above :)
    1
  929. Regarding suft being slow... could that be that it isn't using hardware (ie GPU) acceleration ? That would explain the high CPU usage for apparently not complicated things.
    1
  930. Don't be sorry! I'm thankful, as I didn't realized that mistake, and in general I like to be correct (and a bit pedantic). Soo, thanks!
    1
  931. @ Uuuh, let me guess, correct is "didn't realize" ? Not my native language.
    1
  932. There's Serenity and Serenum (I know they look and sound very similar, but have almost nothing in common). But they totally don't seem like something you can make a lot of money off of it, though in 7-10 years, who knows ?
    1
  933. Yeah, but nowadays gif is useful only in pretty niche cases, for small, simple images. Or animations, but the animation part wasn't the topic of this video clip.
    1
  934. @formdoggie5 I don't know what CPU this x58 is, but since you said it's 12 years old, I think it's not from Intel's Core lineup. In any case, I can bet you that a last-gen processor, be it either Intel or AMD will beat your x58 @ 5.3 GHz in single threaded performance, while running at 4.0 GHz, while also consuming at most half the power. Thing is, increasing the frequency does get exponentially harder and it's kind of a hard cap now. However, the processors kept improving, by making the transistors smaller, and packing more of them. And by having more of them, they have now more cache, more instructions per cycle (literally, not just as a result of better cache), better branch predicition and other small improvements, including non-performance things like better reporting, automatic over and under clocking in order to preserve power or to increase performance while not hitting a thermal throttle. All in all, there have been real improvements in the hardware of CPUs. They're not so evident though. Compared to a CPU from 12 years ago, I'd say that the new ones are about 50% faster/better at the same clock cycle and core count, while having other significant benefits (mostly power consumption). Compared with the increses seen in the '90, going from 33 MHz to 1000 MHz in about 10 years (I guess, too lazy to check exactly) is much more easier to see. But if we factor multi-core in the performance benefit, the increase has been quite good still.
    1
  935. That's quite extreme. If it's 15 hours per week, so 3 hours per day, so 1.5 hours per direction, you should get a permit as it is very wasteful. It should be below 10 hours per week (1 hour per direction per day)
    1
  936. That a big outlet can't a) pay a stupid fee to another outlets, like they're not in the same boat (sure, you can argue that it wasn't one of the bigger ones, so up until now they had no need to pay it, but then how did they found out?). Also, they should have some form of budget for things like this that doesn't need preapproval. After all, these sites are several bucks a month, even if you get all of them, it will be, what, several thousand dollars ? Hardly something to be concerned with at a big company. also b) can't fuU^%^##$ng do a stupid translation and have to use things like google translate. From german to english, of all languages. I swear, they should be laughed out of the room. They don't deserve to be in the industry. Let alone by a big or medium outlet in the industry. But it's not like journalists in general have high standards... sigh
    1
  937. What does FHS in FHS linux means ?
    1
  938.  @drishal14  Got it, thanks!
    1
  939. NVidia is clearly hindering the performance on GTX cards! You can trust me, I'm someone from the internet! Jokes aside, I really hope they don't lock this for only RTX cards. Ok, I get it that on my GTX 1060 I might drop from 60 FPS to 23 FPS in whatever game. But I might use it while not gaming, when I'm in a conference and the neighbor above JUST HAS TO DRILL HIS STUPID WALLS. Anyway, in this case what do I risk ? Going from 2% GPU utilization to 70% ? Oh, what a nightmare would that be * rolls eyes *. And it's not like having conferences in which nobody has to repeat stuff would actually be something useful, that all the world needs... /s. Also, I'm not sure from the video... does GTX 1080 sounds the same (aka quite bad) also when going solo, with no gaming/benchmark/stress running alongside ?
    1
  940.  @LTPottenger  Interesting. I just read about what it means. Might save me from headaches later :D Thanks!
    1
  941.  @terrydaktyllus1320  Everybody reading what you write and you (because you wrote it) would have a much more productive use of their time if you'd stop spewing bullshit that you have a very surface knowledge on. In your fantasy cuckoo land there are these "good programmers" that somehow never make any mistakes, their software doesn't ever have any bugs. In the real world, everybody makes mistakes. I invite you to name one, just one "good programmer" that doesn't ever write software with bugs. If it's you who's that person, let me know your non-trivial software that you wrote and that has no bugs. And if you're going to bring the "I didn't say that good programmers don't make mistakes or don't make bugs" argument, then I'm sorry to inform you that Rust, or more evolved languages in general, were created exactly for that. Programmers, good AND bad, especially on a deadline, have to get the most help they can. That's why IDEs exist. That's why ALL compilers check for errors. A language that does more checks, like Rust, but still gives you the freedom do to everything you want, like C, is very helpful. Unlike your stupid elitist posts that "languages don't matter". The bug presented in this video, that's a very classic example of something that would not happen in Rust. With people like you, we wouldn't even had C, just assembler by now. Whenever there's something about programming languages, don't say anything, just get out of the room and don't come back until the topic changes. Hopefully to one that you actually know something about.
    1
  942. While he's there, he could do an oven analysis too. How much heat it can produce, at what temps does the middle tray start to melt etc :D
    1
  943. They have a full day (monday) to read and respond
    1
  944. Same. Well, I've heard it here and there, but never at a wedding. And I would be surprised to, as even at face value, it's an odd mix.
    1
  945. Except that on the Moon or Mars it will simply be a train, since the low pressure is basically provided by the environment. In other words it would be something quite ordinary.
    1
  946. Intel really has too much budget for marketing and too little for HR, training and common sense. Truly sad to see these trainwreks of bafflingly overlong exceedingly boring keynotes.
    1
  947.  @theo949  Dude, you got triggered with no reasons. The video is not making a statement that EVs are not there yet, it's an observation that they're not there yet, and it tries to explain why. You do have some points, and I think that Wendover missed some other factors to influence the tipping point: people's opinion of cost, range and charging needs with EVs. With more people learning how they work, their needs, in the EV context, will also change, and surely the adoption rate would increase, surely also going over the tipping point. In any case, I'd say that the production and infrastructure is already going well, and expanding very nicely. What we'll really need soon is a way of electrical grids to be able to sustain the massive increase in power needs as people start converting to EVs.
    1
  948. Can't wait to remotely access my phone from my laptop!
    1
  949. Why do people keep mentioning that magenta is a color just inside our brains, on the premise that there's no individual wavelength for magenta, but don't mention the same about white ? White is also only in our brains. A computer will simply see RGB. I think people would understand this concept easier if they would mention white too.
    1
  950. LoL Devork :))
    1
  951.  @gammalgris2497  The problem is that many working in the field do so by being employed and put to work on an already big application, several years or older old, with dozens of other programmers working on it too. You can't really do sh!t in these situations, unless it's really bad or the entire team is on board with it, and it also happen to not be rushing and having budget (basically never).
    1
  952. Didn't had/see any issue. Still on 6.13.0 (.2 is available, just didn't got to compile it). But, I don't use Flatpak, soo.... yeah, I guess that's why.
    1
  953. Ooooh, I thought it was low. Good to know!
    1
  954. While I agree on general with the video's ideas, I don't fully agree with the argumentation, and I want to challenge or maybe add to some things presented here. I mean, on the "getting stuck" vs "learning new stuff, like distros, DEs etc" - at which point learning another thing which is kind of the same of what you already know and barely (if any) brings anything new to the table is actually worthwhile ? What I mean is, having the growth mindset is important, but only on the personal "global" level. Meaning, a person should always have a growth and learning mindset, but the focus and topics can (and in most cases should) change over time. Which means that there are many legitimate cases and reasons when you simply want that something you learn or learnt to stay the same, so you can still be proeficient in it, and still can rely on it, so you can the focus on SOMETHING ELSE. While using what you learnt just as a tool with 0 more investment on learning about it or very similar alternatives. Distros and DEs and so on are a perfect example of this, where, after you tried several and know what each is about and what you like most, yeah, not wanting to know about any other distro or DE (unless something truly revolutionary appears) is a perfectly legitimate mindset, when you want to now focus on learning something totally different. "Hey, did you see that new KDE hammer ? It has a nice glossy look. Do you want to learn how to use it and maintain it so the gloss doesn't wear off ?" "No, I like my Gnome hammer just fine, I don't care about that stupid glossy look" "Duuude, wth, why are you so stuck in the past ? You need to have a growth mindset, otherwise your mind will rot" It's like being in the 8th grade and having learnt to do quadratic equations, you keep searching and finding all the possible quadratic equations and challenge yourself to solve them. Yeah, it's good to do it for a while, so you know them by heart, but if you keep focusing just on them, you won't learn what integrals are and group theory and so on. I'd say that checking new distros and DEs (again, after you tried a good bunch of them and know what they're about) is analogous with this. After a while, simply trying new stuff that is fundamentally the same you did before is not so different to jerking off. You get a sense of acomplishment, but you haven't really advanced. There's also something: in my case I do have changes and updates anxiety of some sorts. I know, maybe I'm too much in the mind-rotten-cannot-accept-change-does-not-challange-himself territory. Thing is, I like perfectioning things. I like optimising things. Using a program and see it do things faster and changing it so I can have one less click in a workflow that I use rather often. So, for this, I do like the peace of mind of checking the "market", selecting what I think is the best (be it a distro, desktop environment or window manager, shell interpreter, text editor, video editor, audio editor, video player, audio player, browser etc) and sticking to it, and start optimising it. Usually through configs, then plugings then maybe even patches or actual code changes done by me. And if everybody starts using another program because a new one looks nicer and is new and has 2 more features, then I get very... sad and ... I don't know anxious or nervous ? I mean, if you look at it, the old program can be rather simply upgraded to have those 2 more features and its looks can be configured to look almost the same as good... but people don't care. Then some big company or group decides that what they do will only work on this new program, because they like it, so you can't use the old program, at least not without massive pain. So at that point you're like... "great, basically now I wasted a lot of hours and I have to switch to another program" which, bar that new feature, is strictly inferior because it's slower and you need more clicks to do your thing. Of course you can learn this new program too and change it to your hearts delight. When you get to the same optimisation as you had on the older one BAM another new program to do the same thing, only (ever so slightly) different. And the history repeats. There's the UNIX philosophy that each program should do one thing only and do it well. It's exactly for this reason: so you only learn it once. When you don't have to relearn the same things over and over again, because they got changed, you can then start building bigger things. No, I don't regularly check and learn new letters, digits, screwdrivers, hammers, pencils and so on. So, yes, I would like to stay on Gentoo for 20 years, preferably 100 if I live that long and something better doesn't appear. Same with other apps. Not because I gave up on the growth mindset, but because I want to learn about other stuff now, like driver programming, electrical engineering, plant farming, the french language and so on. No, I couldn't care less right now about the new Arch spinoff. And I think that's totally fine. Lastly @DT I have a genuine challange. Since you said recently that you actually didn't used Windows at all in more than a decade, I have this challenge for you: actually try Windows and MacOS and note at least 5 good things about them each (and not stupid things like "it's good because it's popular" or "the rounded corners are really nice". Actual good stuff). This isn't a "ha, got you with your own words" kind of thing. After this long of time, you might not be aware of what the others did and might not know exactly where Linux stands. Trying them, Windows and MacOS should give you good insights of some things that Linux could improve upon. And it might make you like Linux more. Errr, GNU/Linux, my apologies.
    1
  955.  @ghost-user559  How id DT plagiarizing Luke Smith videos ?
    1
  956. It's worse. When you pirate, say, a movie, you simply deprive the author of your copy. What he did is like pirating a movie and selling it to everybody in your city as if you made it. And with pirating, in some cases you can have legit reasons. Not for plagiarism.
    1
  957. I sure hope that things will get more responsable. But I'm not betting on it.
    1
  958.  @jonbrokaw3569  Dude, just edit the original comment to correct it. No need for a reply.
    1
  959.  @cameronbosch1213  But I didn't said that Mozilla cares or anything like that. I said that in no way it's worse than Google. Which does NOT imply that they are good, just that they're not nearly as bad as them. I gave an example too (though it was an edit, don't know if you saw it) in which it should be clear that it's about 2 horrible persons, but in which one is clearly much worse than the other. Lastly, I DO use Firefox. I don't believe that boycotting it will make it better. It will make it disappear instead. Making it better, despite Mozilla would be to engage on the discourse, participate in what they do and plan. There's many contributors to Firefox that aren't Mozilla employees. It's still mostly a community driven project. If the community is bigger, it can then steer better from Mozilla's shenanigans.
    1
  960. Looks to good to be true for me. I think it's a scam.
    1
  961.  @rawdez_  Intel at that time also thought they will reach 10 GHz soon. It didn't happen for 23 years for a reason. Including nobody ever talking about it. It does NOT exist. Learn to not believe everything you read on the internet, and you'll get out of the conspiracy theory bubble and have a better life. And also start helping the real things, that while being less interesting ... they actually exist.
    1
  962.  @Labotohs  It might. I would still classify that as cherry picked. AVX512 is still not that much used.
    1
  963.  @longhoacaophuc8293  Well said!
    1
  964. GN, I know this is more of a request: since one year has passed since Ryzen's launch, you wouldn't happen to do another series of benchmarks between a Ryzen 7 chip vs 7700K ? With both reasonably overclocked, both the CPU and the RAM (since Ryzen benefits from RAM speeds. There was this saying some time ago that AMD products usually get better over time (than at launch) because of later software improvements. And Ryzen, being new, also lacked specific optimizations for it. There's also Meltdown and Specter. All in all, I'm curios now how/if the gap between the two changed. Though I realize it might be stupid and redundant, since you also did some measurements when changes appeared. But I don't know of a general Ryzen 7 vs 7700K after 1 year (aka now, aka after significant patches). I think a video with this would be a good argument against fanboys (against either side).
    1
  965. OhMyGaaawd, I can't believe you missed the point on that C vs Go comparison at the end. It is a VERY GOOD comparison. Why ? The very thing you mentioned, that you wouldn't use C and Go in the same places. Initially there was only C (ok, a few others too, doesn't matter). But because it is only good at performance and low level control, it sucks at everything else (well, arguably) Go was invented as an alternative. Now Go occupies its own niche because C couldn't properly cover that part. Compared to C, Go has decent everything, it's just not perfect or the best in any of them. And since in some contexts speed of running is not the most important thing, but ease of developing is, they would prefer Go's "decent" vs C's "horrible" part. In regards to his SQL complaints... I'm still not sure what he wants/needs. Apparently statically analyzing that a query works is one of them. Ok, that can be done with SQL. Maybe he wants something like having directly an ORM-like library for a language, bypassing SQL ? Like, you only call functions and everything is run directly or sent from one server to another directly as binary data ? I guess that would be something. I remember that at the beginning there was a screenshot in which I think he wanted to highlight that the parsing of the query took semnificative time. Which, if you use something more direct, could be bypassed. Can't say I dislike the idea of having the option to send directly the structures and data exactly as the DB works with/uses them, so no more parsing is required.
    1
  966.  @ganswijk  No idea about RISC-V, but I remember hearing/reading that ARM does have variable length instructions.
    1
  967. On the complaining about the company part - I strongly disagree. First, just because you chose a [whatever] owned by a company (when you had the choice of [whatever] made by a community) that DOES NOT mean you must agree with everything they did or do, ESPECIALLY future decisions, and ESPECIALLY those that are different in nature to the past ones. The company released that [whatever] to the public for a reason, it wants users to use it, so it's normal to provide feedback for it. Which, when it works below expectations, comes in the form of critiques and complaints. In the end, the company does what it wants, then if they do something stupid, people complain, and if the company doesn't fix it, then it shouldn't be surprised when people stop using their product(s) and/or stop caring about the company. It's normal stuff. People complaining online is normal behaviour and a way for Canonical to find out that they're not doing the best they can. And if they're slow, they'll also see that in the number of new & existing installs. Of course, some people get the complaints to toxic levels. That is a problem. But complaining in general, is totally fine, if it's argumented (and if the user tried to do something about it, made some minimum effort of researching and troubleshooting before starting to complain). It's basically saying "Hey, it's your product, but if you want to keep me as an user/customer, they you should stop doing X". How is that wrong ? I have to say, the take that people shouldn't complain about a company, because it's in their right to take decisions and make changes... well, complaining is not the same as killing/cancelling/dismantling/disowning/forcing the company. That is, OF COURSE, not ok (and illegal). But complaining is 100% in the right of the users to do, just as the company has the right to do whatever with their product. Also, the popularity standpoint, I find it to be a weak argument. The popularity means that something was good YESTERDAY. It's not instant, so it cannot reflect what [whatever] is today. If something has 80% popularity today and the owner made a stupid decision and tomorrow it drops to 70%, well guess what, it's still the most popular, but it's clearly not the best anymore. Just that some people realize it on the spot, while some other people bring the popularity argument. By that logic Windows is excellent, because it's crushingly popular on desktop and laptops. But we all know that it's not that stellar, even though it had good moments, and is still a good operating system, desptie its annoyances. But if history and popularity would have not mattered, and everybody would start from 0% today ? I doubt that Windows would pass 40% market share.
    1
  968. So, at this point Intel could (should?) simply rename the CPUs as not being Core but Skylake. So the top Intel CPU this generation would be Intel Skylake 5900K (skylake - 1000 series, kabylake - 2000, coffee lake - 3000, coffeelake refresh - 4000, whateverlake is now - 5000). This would be clearer, easier while still being accurate & descriptive. You would also be able to say that they reached the Sky... (and can't pass it...) Jokes aside, such a bummer that they really cannot do literally anything with 10nm even after this long. The mobile chips from last year (or was it 2 years ago?) were promising. Big IPC gains, but rather low frequencies. Which you would hope they would improve over time. I actually feel pity a bit for Intel. The improvements and optimisations they did on this 14nm manufacturing are insane, but ... you can't make horses fly.
    1
  969.  @Many_Mirrors  All 4 are with the same motherboard and power supply ?
    1
  970. I'm curious, did SystemD had significant vulnerabilities in its lifetime ? I think that Mental Outlaw actually mentioned that it did not long ago, but I'm too lazy to search for that mention. So, do you know SystemD's track record ? And also Pulse Audio's one, since you mentioned it ?
    1
  971. Because those solar panels would be wasted. Instead of being inefficient because not always in good/perfect orientation with no shade, it will also increase weight and complexity. Those solar panels would massively be more efficient just staying in a parking lot, always in sun's view.
    1
  972.  @nomadhgnis9425  That's a bold AF take. Since when has "never" meant to mean 20 years ? Or even less ?
    1
  973. ​ @nomadhgnis9425  Fair enough. Though at some point it will become a bit too much work, and at that point running those apps with something like docker, appimage or, at worst, in a vm, will be the solution. But I'm happy if that is later rather than sooner. So whatever hardware is not properly supported by Wayland (like GTX 1000 series) is well beyond their running
    1
  974. Wait, so if I understand correctly what's said in Part 2, when you had 1 event before, if you want to have the same data, you have to use 2 events now ? That invalidates a bit the cost savings.
    1
  975.  @oshalaby-tt  No, when I said Free software I did not meant free as $0, I actually meant free as free speech software. I even mentioned "that you can monetize". Don't know where you got the impression of free as $0, I didn't refer to that anywhere.
    1
  976. Yeah. He should think about making his house taller :)
    1
  977. Wait, you don't have trolley buses anymore ? After trains and trams (aka also trains) they're the next most carbon-free method of transport. No need of super big, super heavy, impossible to stop burning if it burns battery like electric buses. And because they don't have to carry the battery, they're more efficient too. Well, not a big battery, having one for 20-30 km or so is good to have. In Romania, and from what I know other Eastern European countries, we still have them.
    1
  978. To be fair, the first topic - the happiness report, that is based on the period BEFORE the elections. We'll see how Trump & fElon's actions impacted the happiness on the next year report.
    1
  979.  @PasserMontanus  Well, it's not his native language, so I can't fault him for that. But I did cringe everytime I heard it. It just sounds very off.
    1
  980. GN said in another comment: " We used a 7980XE."
    1
  981.  @sgtyota  And progressive loading. And wide gamut + HDR support.
    1
  982. AppImages are the best, got it! Well, other than compiling the application directly, for best performance and least storage space. Gentoo FTW!
    1
  983. Yes! I was searching for this. Or a rational number :))
    1
  984. What is that religious figure and its quote ?
    1
  985.  @lepidusthewiser  I don't use Mac at all
    1
  986. Most IDEs have pretty good remote connecting tools. Remote debugging too (if it's enabled on the host, of course). And intelliJ also recently added a remote work functionality, where everything is run remote and only the GUI is run in the client (your) sistem. Though I have no idea how well it works.
    1
  987.  @WhatsACreel  Whoa, didn't expect a reply from you. Thanks for the explanation!
    1
  988.  @moussagacem8260  Cringe AF copy pasta
    1
  989. If I'm not mistaken a halving of the transistor gate size would mean aprox 4 times less surface/area occupied. So, no, 7nm wouldn't be less dense :)
    1
  990. Theoretically it will performe worse, since it won't be a mature process, but if that beefy cache size increase is true, that alone might make it better than all 14nm processors.
    1
  991. That hut contributor surely is putting much more work than that lazyass hut contributor.
    1
  992. For what ? GPUs ?
    1
  993. Technically speaking, maybe someone got (very) triggered by something in the first few minutes of the video, enough so that the rest of the video cannot redeem it (and even so, the like or dislike can be unapplied)
    1
  994. It's a running meme, I'm sure that the commenter just did it for the laughs.
    1
  995. I actually don't know if Pele is the greatest or not, I'm not into football, but the priases that Thoughy2 put are so cringe that it makes me doubt he's actually that great!
    1
  996. Is this for real ?
    1
  997.  @r0nd0n39  Thanks!
    1
  998. Yup!
    1
  999.  @techpriest4787  No, that excludes SteamOS, which has more than 40%
    1
  1000. It's easy, we don't have a life, so we can watch things like this when we eat, for example 😀
    1
  1001. A bit lazy to check, but doesn't Brave have more market share than Opera ? And you sure it's just 0.05% ? Sounds waaaay too low.
    1
  1002. Like Framework for laptops ? That would be awesome! But the reality is that you'll get drowned in regulations and making things compliant. It will be really difficult to make it fully compliant. And probably not cheap also, though at least in that regard, the prices have go so much up, that it might still be competitive.
    1
  1003. Yeah, in this sorting cases, it's mostly about the "class", O(n^2) vs O(n*logn) vs O(n). When in the same class, the specifics matter more, to compare the algorithms.
    1
  1004. I was searching for someone to mention this! Since DT didn't mentioned at least for sed that it comes from stream edit. Btw, do you know what does the "aw" in awk come from ? Awesome ? Always works ? Assembly workarounds ?
    1
  1005.  @flinx  If you look at 1:41 you can see that the tunnel is quite small. What's that, 3 meters in diameter ? I don't think anything like a bus or a van would fit. Maybe a custom made vehicle which would have to be low and if longer than a Tesla to have the possibility to bend. This is part of why this was cheap, the tunnels are very small.
    1
  1006. "Even as a desktop OS is buggier" maaan, what do you mean by that ? Linux as a desktop OS was always, by far, the buggiest version of it. Maybe you meant to say "even as a server OS" ?
    1
  1007. Where did you see ARC 770 performing as 3070 ? From the (quite many) reviews I've seen, it rarely gets close to it. Usually is about 20% slower.
    1
  1008.  @mitcoes  Ah, ok
    1
  1009.  @johanb.7869  Almost the same for me. Just that I started with version 2 IIRC. And there was a time when, with Firebug it was running kind of slow/bad, but other than that period (like 10 years ago, for 1-2 years) it was always withother any issues.
    1
  1010.  @divyanshbhutra5071  You're VERY wrong about upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5. No motherboard laptop or desktop supports that (except some very niche experiments). Only the 12th, 13th and 14th gen Intel CPUs support both DDR4 and DDR5, but not at the same time. And, theoretically motherboards could have slots for both of them, but it's a massive cost that basically nobody would benefit from. So no matter what computer you have, you were locked into DDR4 or DDR5 anyway. The problem is that those 8 GB that are soldered will always be 8 GB. And that dual channel will be meh at best, since you can't have matching sticks of memory. But the dual channel thing is not a gigantic issue. But 8 + 16 GB of RAM, if you take care of that laptop and if it's not built badly, can still last you and can still be usable 10 years after its release. That's not that bad, I'd say. Certainly not enough to warrant it illegal. I do wish they would be taxed slightly more for being closer to e-waste.
    1
  1011. Wow, I can't believe how wrong the history of OOP was portrayed. Literally all that Dave said that OOP coined existed before OOP. I would dislike this 5 times if I could, for such a distorted and wrong painting of the past, and from someone who should know much MUCH better. Since I can't dislike multiple times, I unsubscribed. Can't support someone who lies so easily or is so sloppy.
    1
  1012.  @sulai9689  sigh, YT shadow banning again. I put a detailed reply, but you have to sort the comments by "Newest first" in order to see it. Fortunately this video doesn't have that many comments, so this is usable here.
    1
  1013. We need to take back Mozilla from these clowns. At this point I can only deduce that they're doing this on purpose. Jeez Luoise, what a s**ts**w, it's not even funny anymore.
    1
  1014. About that workspaces per monitor... if you want to have an app, a window that will span on, say, two monitors, is that possible ? Or it HAS to be on floating mode ? Or it doesn't work at all ?
    1
  1015.  @chelonianegghead274  Booooo. Oh well, can't say I'm surprised.
    1
  1016.  @AndersJackson  I remember not long ago that 386 support was dropped. And Linus expressed hope that 486 support will be dropped soon too, in order to do some cleanup. But, yeah, Debian still has 32 bit support. And I'm pretty sure AntiX too. Surely there are others too, though, understandably, their number is dwindling. But why I said Gentoo is because of the amount you can customize it. There's a video on YT with a madman who installed the latest Gentoo at that time on a 486 in 2018 or 2019. Of course, it was compiled on another computer, but still, quite impressive.
    1
  1017. Finally, a decent take!
    1
  1018. If the page is very light and the backend is also very fast, simply reloading the page with the changes done can actually be a solution. Not for EVERYTHING, but it can still be a very usable and modern website.
    1
  1019.  @larryczerwonka5125  Oh ok, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation. Yeah, didn't knew about the "below the fold" term. Technically it can be done with a # in URL to automatically scroll into view. But it can get cumbersome fast, if you have a lot of places to take care of.
    1
  1020.  @larryczerwonka5125  Yeah, I'm kind of the same. I like the language, but I hate the frameworks that spawned out of it. jQuery is so good, powerful and well designed, why can't the rest be the same ? Unobtrusive and an actual library, an actual tool. Oh well.
    1
  1021.  @Qewbicle  Work peasant!
    1
  1022.  @sigmundfreud4472  Yeah, see the pinned comment (which was after you posted your comments). DT edited the wrong make.conf in the beginning, so he used the default settings, which, I think, means that he compiled everything single threaded.
    1
  1023. I almost hate Microsoft with a passion, but I couldn't simply spew such gigantic BS that Win 11 uses almost 8 GB of RAM idling. Maaaybe if you have 128 GB of RAM and if you also have a lot of extra bloatware, then maaaaybe you can reach that. But a clean Win 11, even with 128 GB (it matters how much total you have, as Windows will try to prefetch and cache things if you have extra/spare RAM, which is GOOD) I don't think it reaches that much. My Win 10 was at about 3.6 GB of RAM un startup, and I have 64 GB of RAM in total. And I don't have a clean installation, this Win 10 was never reinstalled, it's still the same (but upgraded to Pro at one point) that came with the laptop, almost 8 (yes, eight) years ago.
    1
  1024. What do you mean 2nd gen 16" Framework ? The first gen isn't even out, was there any talk of a 2nd gen ?
    1
  1025. Theoretically, yes, it will be possible, but when ? Nobody knows.
    1
  1026. Bump for visibility
    1
  1027. That would be the only redeeming part there, investing into future revenue streams. But I'm skeptical.
    1
  1028. OCD much ?
    1
  1029. Someone mentioned in another comment about waypipe. I think it should address the "ssh into my PC and open a GUI app" but I don't really know and I'm too lazy to check, but I hope it's useful information nevertheless.
    1
  1030.  @laundmo  First it's much more different. And if I'm not mistaken there's still things you can do in C++ that you can't do in Go. Or at the same performance.
    1
  1031. Context FYI That's an interesting question. From what I know the GPU is really specialized on very specific instructions (usually math related), while CPU has more diverse instructions. Besides having to rewrite all the software I think it would simply not be efficient. But in theory I think it could work. Going from 8x4GHz to 1000x1.5GHz cores. But you'll then use half of the GPU for CPU-related tasks.
    1
  1032. I didn't, but I saw several comments of people realizing even later that it wasn't a reaction video. So you're not the only one :)
    1
  1033.  @justanothercomment416  Hey, thanks for the reply. I had the same problem multiple times and sometimes you can see the extra comments by using Sort By newest first. YT is trash. In this case, I can see your comment which starts with "have to do the research yourself". The results by stat counter website (which is where we have the 4.45% figure from) isn't simply checking the user agent that people visiting various websites have ? That's bypassing counting installs and things like that. But there's the thing that some might fake the user agent in order to be more anonymous. But I think it's still a rather small percent. Also I really REALLY REALLY doubt Linux is on par with Macos on desktops and laptops. Maybe on desktops alone. Apple hit a home run when they launched the M chips and a lot of people bought into that and are still in it. Apple laptops are much more common. Not even a contest. Yet.
    1
  1034.  @justanothercomment416  You still haven't said (well, wrote) anything resebling a reference. Just mentions that the counts are wrongly made. And you call that facts. Unbelieveable. And just so you know, nothing you said seem to have anything related to the percentages that everyone uses. The Linux marketshare that's being cited everywhere, the one that said that Linux is at 4.45% one months ago and 4.55% this month is Statcounter . Search for "statcounter operating system market share" in any search engine and then filter by Desktop (which includes laptops) and you'll get to the 4.55% figure. Now, statcounter measures this by having a small tracking code in (what they say) 1.5 million websites. From what you say, you're speaking about a totally different thing. Which I still have no idea what that is. And you can see in that stat counter that Linux is nowhere near OS X. And I totally believe that. Everywhere I look that's not a Linux community, there's more Apple laptops that laptops that run Linux. And Linux on Apple laptops is still basically non existant yet, as it's not yet ready for daily use.
    1
  1035.  @Dratchev241  From what I heard, Brave will continue to support v2 going forward (along with v3, of course)
    1
  1036. I'm still waiting for that episode of AWS (played by Biden) vs Azure (played by Trump). Come on Eli, stop slacking!
    1
  1037. @PurePhoenix "if ID software can do it anyone can" - uhm, if the company who trailblazed the 3d games, and had some quite sick optimizations. mostly powered by one of the best programmers of all time can do a thing, surely any other company can do it, right ?? It's true that id Software now doesn't have John Carmack and Michael Abrash anymore, but John did got to work on Doom(2016)
    1
  1038. Brodie, WE ARE in the 21st century!
    1
  1039. Holy crap, I really hate to do this, but the calculations at 9:00 are really off. Let me put it in another way. Let's actually compute the energy needed for a 36 t vehicle going at 60 kmph for 901 km (560 miles for the cavemen out there). Using the computing method as shown by Engineering Explained's video named "Why Teslas Are Bad At Towing (Today)" (search it here on YouTube) from 4th December 2019, and using the following assumptions: drag coeficient is 0.6 (what I found is typical for a truck, after a quick search), the same 3.7 sqm area as in the EE's video (40 sqft for the neanderthals out there that somehow know to read) which is almost 2 by 2 meters, and a rolling resistance coeficient of the same 0.015, which seems actually to be pretty conservative, I've found lower estimates after a quick search on the web. Also these 901 km are on completely flat land. Formulas used: on short, the total force needed is Fa (force to overcome aero drag resistance) + Fr (force to overcome rolling resistance). Fa = 1/2 * p (density of air, in kg/m^3) * v^2 (speed of the vehicle, in m/s then squared) * Cd (coefficient of drag resistance, unitless) * A (area displaced, in 1/m^2) Fr = G (vehicle's weight, which is mass * g, in N) * Crr (coefficent of rolling resistance, depending on tires and the surface, like asphalt, unitless) Then the force is multipled by the distance, to find out the energy in Joules and then I converted it to kWh, since that seems to be used more in these kind of discussions. So, after doing the calculations, the energy needed is 94.94 kWh for the Aero drag resistance and 1325 kWh for the rolling resistance. For a total of 1420 kWh energy needed to move a 36 000 kg vehicle on flat asphalt for 901 km. And taking the current usually used estimate of 0.25 kWh per kg energy density of Li-ion batteries, we end up with a battery which has 5683 kg, so 5.7 tonnes. I wouldn't say I used optimistic numbers. And even for this truly unneeded long range of 900 km, the battery is much lower than "8-16 tonnes" nonsense. If the truck would go at 100 kmph then it would need 1589 kWh of energy, or 6358 kg of batteries. If the truck would go at 60kmph but just for 400 km, then it would need a mere 630 kWh energy or 2523 kg of batteries. As if it wasn't enough, there's one more thing that makes this even better, and can be seen in the Honda Accord vs Tesla Model 3: the car weight, without the batteries. The Tesla one vs Honda is 300 kg less. That's because the electrical engine is smaller and there's other stuff that's simply not needed. I expect this to be the same in a truck, and something like 1000 kg to be shed from a normal diesel truck when getting it to be electrical. So this means that the extra weight will be about 3-5 tonnes. And probably the range a bit smaller. But it's still up for 15 tonnes of payload or 25% less which might be less than the other economies of going electric. In other words, I can totally see this working. Please Thunderf00t stop these cringe calculations and most importantly, stop giving musktards fuel for refuting you or your points and videos. You represent the science community and this 8-16 tonnes of batteries bullshit is just... sad.
    1
  1040. @Fourier21 I don't 100% agree with what TF says, though I'd say I'm like 90%. I like most of his videos. Only other criticism I had for him, but I think was also buried in the thousands of comments, was the total clickbait title of "Why Tesla's batteries suck" or something like that. And in that video it goes to show why batteries in general are not perfect one-size-fits-all solution and that they have lower energy density than gas. Absolutely nothing wrong with Tesla there, but he just had to put it there. Anyway, I do have faith that if TF sees my comment, he won't call me an Elon fanboy. I think it's obvious that I'm not and TF is not that bad.
    1
  1041.  @taiiat0  How the hell is the range only 30-40% bigger, when towing a trailer more than double the Cybertruck's weight ? Does the empty trailer weight in 12000 pounds or something ? What am I missinig ? Shouldn't the range be increased by something like 300-500% ?
    1
  1042. Care to mentiono why ? Not the unsubcribing, but the lost at part.
    1
  1043. Overall I like Tim's involvement and input. Still can't trust Epic one bit. In this case, I'm lucky that I don't play Fornite. Regarding the custom kernels and such... we've come full circle. Now we'll have custom OS installs just to play X & Y games. Like back in the early 80s when we had diskette A: for the OS and diskette B: for the program that we wanted to run (that's why in Windows the C: drive is the HDD/SSD, A: and B: were reserved from the DOS era for the system and program floppy disks). And in some situations, the OS had to be customized specifically for the program, so you had multiple diskettes with the same OS, just customized differently. I feel like we'll going in the same direction now, get an OS just for the exagerrated anti-cheat-ridden games, and another OS for normal use. I guess it's the price to pay in order to be able to not play online vs bots and autoaims and other complete mood killers.
    1
  1044. That's weird, I don't have that problem. Using Gentoo with pipewire and dwm (of course, with X)
    1
  1045. #AskGN would disabling HyperTreading AND cores on a 10900K, coupled with overclocking it, the cache and memory, for specific games (like knowing that game X only uses 8 cores, so disable HT on all of them, while also disabling 2 cores), do you think that using that would significantly increase the performance and/or the power usage & temps of that specific CPU ? If I got your attention, how much do you think that a 10900K with a 4c/8t would compare to a 6700K ? Or in 4c/4t configuration vs a 6600K ? I'm asking in the context of being curious of the overall advancements in the Skylake-generation of CPUs. Just with the cores&threads configuration, the 10900K should perform much better, only from the power budget alone. But I'm also curious if the frequencies would be the same if the power targets are matched. Or vice-versa, if the power usage is the same if they are locked at the same frequencies. In this last scenario I'm curious about the performance too, since I think the power usage will be lower for 10900K, effectively meaning that it has all the same limits, so in this case the IPC can be compared (if there's any improvement). I have to say, I'm very excited about the overclocking improvements that Intel added to this 10th gen (...."gen"....). Too bad they're still a bit too expensive and behind in IPC and power draw. Intel really had a lot of bad luck by not being able to deliver the 10nm manufacturing even now, 3 years later (or is it 5 later than initially annouced?). The laptop CPUs looked interesting, with pretty good IPC increase, only drawn back by limited cores and frequencies. I was hoping they would have something by now, but I think that on desktop 10nm will be skipped entirely. Also #AskGN, how would Intel's 14nm, TSMC's 7nm and the other 7nm variants would be called using the new metrics proposed by ... that consortium that I forgot it's name and I'm too lazy to check ? I even forgot the metrics they proposed to use. I only remember that there were about 3 of them, the main ones, and that one of them would be the transistor density. Anyway, seeing them in your videos and hearing them would get all of us used to them sooner rather than later :) If you read this far, cheers!
    1
  1046. All I took from this video is that now I'm curious to see just how bad Lumina is. From the screenshot, there was nothing horrible there.
    1
  1047.  @serge5046  Someone here mentioned (and DT pinned the comment) that DT edited the wrong make.conf in the beginning, so he basically used the default settings. Which means he didn't used -march=znver1, but he also didn't use -j6. Which means all compilations were single threaded ?
    1
  1048.  @galileo_rs  I'm not so sure, Fair point, but still a lot of "maybes" and "ifs"
    1
  1049. @pong-sx9je What US army ? And what agreement ? The Minsk one where Russia agreed to basically nothing ? Also, you don't get to start a war just on what might happen. You don't go and kill HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of innocent people because you're not sure. You don't annex regions of foreign territory "because you're defensive". The amount of logic in these kind of statements is so lacking, it's not even funny. Russia absolutely did NOT had to intervene, it was totally just their choice and fault. And in your example with Mexico, the same thing - US has absolutely no basis on attacking and annexing 20% of Mexico just because Mexico built some military bases. With or without Russia's help. Get into the 3rd millenium please, we have things like basic human rights here.
    1
  1050.  @attilaedem101  Just because others didn't had the opportunity to ask for "a sugar daddy" in the past, it doesn't mean that one shouldn't ask for help. That's totally irellevant. The hell are you smoking ? When faced with extinction, people do whatever they can to survive. How can you be against asking for help ? In case you're not aware, Ukraine is NOT forcing USA to send help, that might've missed your point of view. And my country is not Ukraine, you tool.
    1
  1051.  @McClainJ  On the preparation argument, fair point. Not so sure about the nuclear arsenal, I'd say it's better to stay off it. Realistically do you think it could've used it in any way, shape or form, without making things much worse for themselves in the long run ?
    1
  1052. By virtual environment you don't mean using Docker or QEMU ? Or Virt Manager ? What do you mean "with VS Code" ?
    1
  1053.  @phaedrus2633  Oh, ok, didn't knew about Python virtual environment. I know about VS Code, but didn't understand its link with a virtual environment. Btw, you might still benefit from something like docker. In case you have, say, Python 3.7 and you need 3.11 or vice-versa. In a container or actual virtual machine, you can have any version you want.
    1
  1054. Those who are responsable for the new USB naming (and even got paid for that)... I hope they die of hunger. And cold. Names are actually very important.
    1
  1055. That Archer2.... 748 000 CPU cores ? 1 570 000 GB of RAM ? That thing can actually run Google Chrome AND Minecraft at the same time! And if you limit yourself on the tabs open and the people in Minecraft, you could squeeze a Minesweeper @ 30fps there too. Surely won't be able to run Crysis though...
    1
  1056. How many ? Because if it's for 50 eggs, then that's not that bad.
    1
  1057. I reeeaaaally don't believe that URK were killing ethnic russians, I'm sure that's russian propaganta. It's well known that Russia will interfere at much MUCH minor things when it can play the "protect our russian people" card. They've done that all the time in the whole last century, including (lots of it) in the last 20 years too. UKR (nor anybody) wouldn't risk it.
    1
  1058.  @mrmoinn  LoL, haven't thought that far. Regarding code that's like all the statements in a single line, eventually also "glued" together by gimmicks like comma or !! in Javascript - these cases I'd say they can simply be ignored. Just have a beautify/code formatting tool do its thing and count the lines of the result. While we're here, any binary operator (binary as in takes two operands) should be counted as a semicolon. Yeah, I agree that attributes/decorators/whatever should also count. This thing is hard! Maybe we should just count the abstract syntax tree size and be done with it, lol.
    1
  1059. I don't know benchmarks for DF, buuut, from what I know, it's actually CPU intensive. The feeble graphics are actually a must-have when so many things are actually taken into account. I think you can play it even with a Pentium 3, but your max speed of the game might be quite low.
    1
  1060. Holy cr@p, really ? Single thread ? I know it was started like 15 ? years ago, but ... sheesh... Well, I guess I shouldn't comment until I make something just as great...
    1
  1061. Oh, I'd like to see the BSD arrogants (not saying all are like that, but they certainly have some folks who have a superiority complex) now argue that BSD supports more CPUs than Linux.
    1
  1062.  @tylerdean980  True, the others still support it.
    1
  1063. Dude, what ? The AVG FPS is the average of all the frame times for all the frames. The 1% LOW is the average of the worst/lowest FPS/highest frame time frames. Similar for 0.1% LOW Also, you can technically call the AVG FPS number to be the 100% LOW (or 100% anything, since it takes all 100% FPS figures). If still in doubt, find out what percentile graphs are. Hope this helps!
    1
  1064. You know what's best ? All that suspection magic and not once have I heard AI in that section! Which, to me, means that it's legit, not hopium BS.
    1
  1065.  @excidium666  Can you tell us the title of that response ? I'm curious (and lazy to search).
    1
  1066. #HeyDT! Why do you have Threadripper ? What led you to pick/choose/get that ? What would be the ideal CPU to upgrade to ?
    1
  1067. Press and keep Shift and double tab Z there you go
    1
  1068. However boring it may be when you see basically the same install for 25th time (not an exagerration on DT's videos), it is important for bringing new users to Linux. We've simply grown out of this phase, I'd say. DT still teaches 6th grade maths, and we're all here because we like DT, even though we're 9th graders now. So getting back to the point, whenever an important distro is released, it's good to have coverage of it. Doesn't matter if other people are doing it, you, as a content creator, should do your thing, your spin on it. Everybody covering it - YT picks it up as an important topic and so it can reach to those outside of the bubble. And when a new-to-Linux user is curious, he should be able to trivially find beginner-friendly videos for exactly the latest versions of whatever he's searching for. And that's exactly what DT is doing. A new user will not know that there are other distros or that the same distro, the version from 5 years ago, installs the same. If you only find old videos in a topic, that gives the impression that topic/thing is abandoned.
    1
  1069.  @papalegba6759  Well, it can work in places where there's not many people needed to be transported and where people don't mind the premium cost (or where somebody else pays it). But yeah, nothing revolutionary here. 40 places in the town, linking multiple cities, uh-hum, right, won't happen.
    1
  1070. :)) So, it was YOU who expected the spanish inquisition!
    1
  1071. I'm surprised by this. Being in Romania, I thought that in all the scandinavian area -20C is like a chilly autumn. Or normal everyday occurrence in winter.
    1
  1072. Holy crap that's... rather low. Unless you have a very low power CPU (5-15W), I don't think that the electricity consumed was less than those $0.02
    1
  1073.  @ishashka  I was thinking of trying it out on my 4,5 yo laptop too. With 6700 HQ. Thing is, the laptop CPUs are actually a bit better on the efficiency than normal desktop CPUs. Sure, lower performance, but much less power draw too. In the end, after seeing what somebody computed in another comment here, and knowing that I don't have a new, efficient (7nm or 10nm) CPU, I realized that I better not waste time trying it. Bottomline, you might have the efficiency, but if you consume $4 of electricity and make $5 of Monero... why bother ? :)
    1
  1074. Hey, nice pointers! I have a question, regarding point 1 & 2. As I was already thinking of using ramfs to handle compiling, so I don't wear out the SSD. And I was wondering if it's possible to do compiling on one or a series of Rasperry Pis. That is, instead of using my beefy laptop for that, delegate it to one/few R Pis to 1) still be able to fully use the laptop with no interruptions or slowdows and 2) use (much) less power. But I worry that R Pis might be too weak or have too little RAM (max 8 GB per Pi) for that, especially if I set it to use the RAM instead of the internal storage. From your experience, is this feaseable ? Or are the Pis too weak/have too little RAM to make it work ? I'm ok if one Pi is only doing a package at a time, even on a single core, and if it takes 20 hours for one of the bigger ones, as overall I'll think I'll still be able to be up-to-date.
    1
  1075.  @Doyyumhwaji  Maybe it's a name thing. If you care about humanity getting better, name your next son Steve!
    1
  1076.  @ayeRiseAi  Fair point.
    1
  1077.  @davidgomez79  Well, hating stupidity is totally normal. I hate Apple cultists too. But I wanted to say/highlight that you hate unreasonably much the RPI 5 & the foundation. And on Jeff by proxy.
    1
  1078. You can't call something the "greatest OS of all time" if it doesn't work in the majority of devices (phones in this case) on the current landscape. Fight me! For real though, I want it, but don't want to buy a Pixel phone, neither new nor SH. And saying it's supported just on Pixel because it has extra hardware security features - bullshit! I mean, I don't challenge that it's not, but I want to point out that it's a very stupid argument. Maybe in alpha and pre alpha stages it would be ok. But on the full release, it's MUCH MUCH more important to have people onboard and even with just like 90% of the privacy and 50% of the security (and still much better than what the original phone has) than to have only one line of phones that limit the exposure to 10% of the potential users. That's bad prioritisation at this point. At least if they care more about raising the global security and privacy. It's not an easy decision to make, and I can't fault them, I'm just saying what I think would be more important (maybe a bit in a harsh matter, but, meh). I do think a lot of people would rather actually be able to use Graphene on their current phone, without the full security suite, than to have the Graphene OS team develop 3 security features extra, but keep the Pixel limitation (which means that people have to wait more until they try it, or switch to a Pixel phone - and maybe lose some features, like Louis does now) Other than that, I agree, it's awesome! Won't try it on a Pixel, sorry. Can't wait for it to become more popular and branch into other models, hopefully Fairphone and Pinephone.
    1
  1079. On your first point, IT IS objectively wrong. That "if the min distance is 7 for very large inputs" is NOT a given, it just so HAPPENS to be in this example. You don't know the input beforehand. If you add another string to the input and get to have two strings 150 characteres long and their distance is 10, but the first 100 chacters are the same, Fortran would say that the min distance is 0, while in reality it is still 7.
    1
  1080. @ Glad to help :)
    1
  1081. Hmmm, this time Brodie is not out...
    1
  1082. The only guy in the world I would trust if he'd say he would pay 10 times more for something or he did read the 90 page EULA is Richard Stallman. And given how overwhelmingly most of the people wouldn't go nowhere near to the lengths he'd go to prove a point, yeah, no way even 0.1% of people would go with priciples first, when the cost is so high. We need more people like Richard Stallman. We need more people like Louis Rossmann. Capitalism needs to be properly regulated in order to not be wild west or ran away by a few sociopathic people. Regulated so people have rights. Like right to ownership. Right to repair.
    1
  1083. Did they do anything shady ?
    1
  1084. But all of his business already have over 5 years ? So this prediction IS a very big deal, especially given how much credit people give Musk ? Do you think Ford or Jeff Bezos will be bankrupt in 5 years ? For some people Tesla or SpaceX or Musk being bankrupt in 5 years is as impossible as for normal people imagining Ford or Amazon or Jeff Bezos being bankrupt in 5 years.
    1
  1085. Have you ever head of subway trains ? They don't cause emissions either, and haven't done so in more than 50 years! What's even better they don't need to recharge or carry heavy, polluting, short-lifespanned batteries. What a time to be alive!
    1
  1086. I'd say it's "casual overclocker" level. Which is high level (not extreme) in the grand scheme.
    1
  1087. That's so blatantly false and wrong (that these kind of pushes are necessary) that I'm doubting the ability to reason. I'm not referring only to the OP comment but many who defend it too. First, there is a GIGANTIC difference between a) forcing users to try something new and giving the option to use the old, which is known to work and b) forcing users to try something new and if they're missing something ... well tough luck ? How is that not OBVIOUSLY irresponsible ? What are they supposed to do, stay on the old one ? Go to a different distro or a different spin (which might be more different than another distro but with KDE) ? Well then, don't be surprised if they don't come back. Second, the reason that "if they don't do that, people would not try or switch to and it will not evolve" is also blatantly false. Wayland now is progressing very nicely and fast. Yet NOBODY forces Wayland as the only option. Proof that removing options and functionality from users is not needed (DUUH). Doing that will only alienate the users and feed the Wayland (or whatever is pushed) haters. It's a lose-lose situation by infatuated people who care more about being/feeling bleeding edge than providing and caring for their users. It adds, I would argue, nothing, while raising all kinds of concern and stress and conflict, like this very thread. While waiting until Wayland is truly ready and then doing the switch, nobody would bat an eye. You can see they're searching for excuses rather than actually caring from that statement that they'd rather do the switch on a major version change. Because it makes sense, it's something to be expected. But they didn't thought (too much of a distance) that removing it now is 10 times the distress than removing it in, say, KDE Plasma 6.4.
    1
  1088.  @deviantsemicolon618  Yes, but without adding new features, is that maintenance that much ? Or that risky to simply label it as "[unmaintained]" so the users use it at their own peril ?
    1
  1089.  @elmariachi5133  "But I don't care what it brings for developers, when I am talking from a user's perspective" Well, Rust will add absolutely nothing to the users, directly. But what you're saying is that you don't want the tree cutters to get chainsaws as an upgrade from simple axes, because they won't bring you better wood for your stove. Yes, it's THAT silly. You could say that lumberjacks with chainsaws will bring more wood, or deliver it faster and probably, on average, cheaper. Well, that's the same with Linux's kernel too. With Rust instead of C, it allows developers to write & get to a secure & stable state faster. But it can't be quantified how much faster, so no promises can be made. For some things it might really be the same time. Maybe even worse, who knows. But on average, it should be faster, as more complex things will be able to have statically-determined memory safety, allowing the developer to not spend many hours checking and testing that (well, where it can, some things in the kernel have to be made in unsafe mode). Or it might allow the developer to release something that is secure, instead of releasing something in the same timeframe that will have bugs.
    1
  1090.  @thelonelyrogue3727  Jeez, 60% capacity loss in just 9 years ? That looks like a lot. Did he do 800 000 Km with that Leaf ?
    1
  1091.  @GamersNexus  Uhm, you didn't mention in the APO segment that you now have the option of turning on APO on 12th and 13th gen CPUs (and I guess the unsupported 14th gen ones). It's just that it's not yet officially supported so Intel doesn't guarantee it will work/be better. Not a huge mention, but pretty nice for 12th and 13th gen users, they can try it out, maybe for some games it works and it's exactly what they needed to get to a sweet spot.
    1
  1092.  @theshyboy  It's intimidation, not persuasion. But, yeah, nat 1 on that.
    1
  1093. June 2024 "Is intel really actually totally screwed ? Round 11" while AMD gets to 96% market share in IoT, phone, tablet, notebook, ultrabook, laptop, desktop, enthusiast, server and supercomputer CPU sales.
    1
  1094.  @proctoscopefilms  Except that all the things that are shown in that Nextcloud window are separate areas in backend. Basically that window does one thing: fetches the status of all internal apps, to say so.
    1
  1095. @Rainbow Capone I think it's the other way around, buddy.
    1
  1096. I have this vague feeling this will happen more and more going forward.
    1
  1097. @hamobu You have no idea what you are talking about. Using a single metric (YouTube videos) is very flawed. You could a lot of stuff in 1998 with Windows 98. Why can't you do even more stuff with a computer from 2009 which has much much better specs than an 1998 computer with Windows 98 ? You can do documents and spreadsheets very very fine. And also most of the browsing needs, with few exceptions, because a lot of websites are terribly bloated nowadays. To get technical, if you need to play videos from YouTube and you Pi or old computer is struggling, it might be that it doesn't use video acceleration. Using VLC (which can be used to watch directly a clip from youtube, no extra download neccessary) should help by a lot.
    1
  1098. Yup
    1
  1099. It's one of the most customizable and most optimizable (if I can say that) OS. With those use flags you can compile the programs you use to a) use your specific processor's architecture (and also things like O3) and b) only have what you want & use. For point b) there are big portions of some programs that you can effectively cut and simply not have them. In some cases it also makes for some apps to use less RAM, but that's usually a very minor concern. Also, since it's source based, it's very free-software friendly. Lastly, you don't really NEED to be on the cutting edge with all apps. Some of them you can do with not updating/recompiling for months, if you don't need the updates. Lastly lastly, to answer your question ... it is suitable for desktop use. If what you mean if it's also usable as a main-computer-daily-driver, yes, that too, but it will take you some time until you can do it effectively. Not recommended until you're familiar and confortable with Gentoo, so you know exactly what to install, when and what to update and how to solve problems and conflicts when they arise.
    1
  1100. Amen! A lot of the hate came from the pre PHP 5 and PHP 5 era and people haven't adjusted to how PHP 8 is today.
    1
  1101. I think I can imagine. About 20% :P
    1
  1102.  @notuxnobux  Don't know about Arcan, but if what you said in the previous comment is true, why not switch to Arcan right now ? What's missing ?
    1
  1103. Wait, that math section at the beginning sounds/looks pretty wrong. First, the theoretical maximum says 1.36kW/m^2, which, if I'm not mistaken is the solar power that hits the top of the atmosphere. On the ground it's more like 1000-1120 W/m^2, of course in very good scenarios. The computation of how much a solar panel would make doesn't include the solar panel efficiency. So, if we multiply that by 25% efficiency, it's something like 300 W/m^2 Next, in the more realistic scenario, 340 W/m^2 THEN multiplied by 55% irradiance (where is that figure from ? I guess that it's the average for the whole day, since the sun can't be at zenith the whole day. That's why the average daily energy taken at sea level is 6200 Wh, which would be only 6 hours of sunlight, but it's actually more hours, but most with reduced efficiency) THEN multiplied by the panel efficiency ? From what I know, usually the figures are around that 340W per panel, which usually are 1.7 square meters, so with an average of 20% efficiency, assuming 1000 W / m^2. I mean, that's what most people have, 300-400W per panel, at around 200 W/m^2 output, not that measily 37.4 W/m^2. If we're taking averages around the day, then it shouldn't be something expressed in hours. All in all, seems it's comparing seeds to apples.
    1
  1104. But maybe that solar panel can be better put to use on a roof of ... anything, to be used every single day in mostly optimal conditions. A solar panel on a car might be parked underground, between buildings, it's inherently not angled towards the sun, easier to get dirty and at times it might be full and not able to contribute to the grid storage.
    1
  1105. Wow, by 90% ? Would you say that the "before" figure was vastly inefficient, even by an average Joe who doesn't care at all about energy consumption ? Because it seems so much. I'd like to know more details.
    1
  1106. Well, maybe next year...
    1
  1107.  @brainwater  Yup, most likely, on both your accounts.
    1
  1108. I was thinking the same thing! If the user is far from India and downloads Uber, can't it be without ALL that India-related things ? And say you somewhere "hey, if you go to India you need to download this module/expansion/DLC/whatever"
    1
  1109.  @Linck192  Oh, interesting, didn't knew that. Thanks for the reply!
    1
  1110. That is an excellent video topic. In case there isn't a video soon, or at all here are some tips for switching to Linux: - some things continue to be a hard NO on Linux. To my knowledge the biggest are: Adobe Photoshop and I think their whole creation suite and games with anticheat (some work, but most don't). If you have to use/play these, just stick with Windows, at least for the foreseeable (1 year+) future. Things evolve pretty fast nowadays, so if Linux isn't viable today, trying again in one year you might find that a lot of issues are solved (not guaranteed, of course). - be prepared that Linux is different and still has some things lacking, for many different reasons: some hardware simply don't have drivers made for Linux, as the manufacturers didn't put the effort to (justifyable or not) and might work subpar or not at all. Or if something just got launched, the drivers for Linux might arrive several months later. In general stuff works, with the only important stuff that might be a blocker being some Wi-Fi cards. The rest is more peripheral or niche products. Same with software, like I said above. Some things have to be done differently. In general, if you search online or on YT, you can find what works and not, and if something doesn't work for you, how to do it. But try to use recent sources when you can. - if the above aren't a big concern (or not at all), the first thing to try would be to make a bootable USB stick (easy to do) and reboot your computer into that Linux and see how it is. Check if all the hardware works, especially Wi-Fi if you're on a laptop. Graphic card drivers might be a nuisance depending on the distro, so if that doesn't work that well, don't give up yet. Then try to install the browser(s) you usually use and then the applications / programs / games you need and use often - that being said, here are some Linux distros worh mentioning. Before that, a Linux distro (short for distribution) is a fully working operating system (OS) that uses the Linux kernel (yes, technically Linux is just the OS kernel. A distro comes with many things on top: how it looks and how it can be customized, what package manager it uses (a package manager is basically the App Store / Google Play you have on a smartphone, you can use it directly to install all/most of the software you use and to keep them updated easily), how it general works and feels. So, here they are: - Linux Mint - stable (doesn't change often, focused on things working and not crashing, is slow/delayed to adopt new things), user & begginer and non-technical friendly. My recommandation to try first - Ubuntu - the OG begginer friendly distro, now fallen a bit out of favor in the community. Still very capable and compatible with many hardware and software, as it was the de-facto most used Linux distro for many years, most hardware and softare devs made sure their stuff works on Ubuntu first (and probably only there). Still, it has some caveats, if something doesn't work, do try other distros. Also pretty stable - Fedora - focused on being quite cutting edge, sleek and for work/workstation usage. Not a personal fan of, but it's also a very popular distro that should work very well in most cases, so it's also worth a try - Pop_OS! and TuxedoOS - made by Linux computer manufacturers. Pretty ok/decent, I'd say similar with Linux Mint. Also worth a try - Manjaro, EndeavorOS - more cutting edge, somewhat less stable, but that doesn't automatically mean your system will crash daily or something. Pretty good as beginner distros - Nobarra, CachyOS - gaming optimized distros, also fairly beginner friendly - ZorinOS - focused on having a very Windows-like look and feel. Solid, but I didn't put it as the first option as I feel it's a bit behind now - Debian - very stable, which also means it sometimes is way behind the latest versions of software and drivers. Not my choice for a beginner, though it's used in many situations, good to know about - Arch - advanced distro, skip it for now (also here would be Gentoo if you hear about it) - NixOS - can't say if it's beginner friendly or not - the rest I either forgot or don't recommend for a beginner. If you're technical you can try the more advanced (aka, any distro after all) ones, preferably in a virtual machine first.
    1
  1111. It was always worse than PHP
    1
  1112. I think the 16 tonnes battery is ... well... bullshit. I actually was curious and did some computations and for a 36 tonnes vehicle to go 901 kms (560 miles) at 60 kmph it would need 1420 kWh or 5683 kg of Li-ion batteries. Even if I was somehow too optimistic, from almost 6 tonnes to 16, that's waay to much. Not to mention that the engine would weight less.
    1
  1113.  @nodvick  Uhm, and ? What I said is that basically I think that an electrical semi should be able to have at least 10 tonnes of cargo.
    1
  1114.  @nodvick  So you're saying that most trucks have 2100 miles range ? That's... much more than I expected. I was thinking that even 560 miles is a bit much on most trips.
    1
  1115. Yup, I wanted to say the same thing. I am for making things cleaner and to a spec/standard. Even for very small things like fgrep and egrep which are now 2 small wrappers, they are still polluting, even if very little in practice. But I also don't want things to break so easily. So given that the warning was "just" added, supporting it for literally 10 more years, until all relevant software has got a change to update, that would not be much to ask.
    1
  1116. Introducing more versions introduces more work for them, makes it harder to maintain. It should not be taken lightly.
    1
  1117. @ I do :))
    1
  1118. Haven't Debian recently voted to include non-free drivers or something like that ?
    1
  1119. Why own a car in the first place if you're driving that rarely ?
    1
  1120. Not that much... Tesla has some top-of-the line things in their cars. None which were invented by Musk, though I give credit to him, him being there and pushing everybody to slave-rate levels of labor and attracting funds certainly made Tesla what it is today. Without him, it would either be a small niche firm, or would've went bankrupt. SpaceX ... I don't know, the claims that rockets will get so reusable and so cheap to launch and so fast to get reused, that you could get a launch every day ... and what we have now... quite the difference. Getting to Mars was supposed to be ... 2024 ? Or even sooner ? Now, if I'm not mistaken it's supposed to be 2029. I would bet that not even in 2030 it won't happen. First because it's stupid to send people there, so early. They'll have nothing to do that a robot like Perseverance can't do already. But maybe we'll at least see SpaceX send a rocket with a robot reach Mars by then, but I'm very skeptical they can do that too, until 2030. But, there's a lot more things that are pure con-man snake oil salesman pitch. FSD ? Keeps coming next year since ... 2015 ? The name should also be illegal, it's so far from full self driving, it's not even funny. Robo taxis ? Yeah, right. Cybertruck ? Nope. Tesla Semi ? Clearly not in 2019. LA hyperloop ? Teslas in tunnels (with drivers) - absolutely not profound. The tunnels themselves were also, short, very small in diameter tunnels, dug at normal prices in not-uncommon time. Absolutely nothing revolutionary. Just from this LA thing alone and Musk should be laughed at away from the room when he starts even mentioning revolutionizing transports. Tesla bot ? Get outta here. Splitting so there's not a giant wall of text. Let me continue. Tesla solar roof aquisition ? Quite scummy. Starlink ? Interesting idea, but extremely polluting and unpractical if you think seriously about it. It will never get to fully roll out because of its inherent problems. In the end, the only companies that border revolutionary technology are SpaceX and, briefly, Tesla. Yawn! Just how much and how many times must someone be proven wrong and/or lying for people to realize it's a conman ? Just because he got involved in some companies who actually have products (even at massive losses, like SpaceX is) doesn't mean he's not a vaporware salesman. He had promised a lot of things that range from somewhat impractical (but who knows, maybe it works, a genius could certainly make it work) to downright bullshit. He straight up lied multiple times about when things will get done/released (and a good bunch of them would never be practical). How is that not vaporware salesman ?
    1
  1121.  @mynameismatt2010  Correct, if you're only saying an incorrect date, it's not vaporwave. But if the product is still not released, there's still no guarantee that it will, so it still has the status of vaporware. Also, in this context, if it announces something which sounds revolutionary, says it's ready next year or in 2 years, and it finally releases it in 10 years, at the same time the other companies also release the same thing, in other words, nothing revolutionary, while technically not vaporware (the product), can we agree that it's also a lie ? And that the promise of delivering something revolutionary in the near future is ... vapor ? That is, it doesn't materialize as advertised ? Prime candidates for what I said above are the Tesla Semi and FSD. Unless they go bankrupt or something, these will surely come to market some day. But if they're at about the same time or even later than the competition, and also years and years later than promised, then I'll still label them as conjob, even though it's not on the same level as the things that never get released. I'd say that having a manned mission to Mars is also here, but it doesn't impact the normal people. Gullible investors... I don't care if they don't do their research.
    1
  1122. This needs more upvotes. It will shown in screenshots in 6-11 years from now when people will start question "Why did we abandon Wayland ?"
    1
  1123. I don't like to play the devil's advocate, but the max cargo can't really be just 5-6 tons. By Thunderf00t own calculation, the battery would weight about 7 tons. And the electric motors are simpler and need less parts than a diesel engine. I'd say we can remove ~1 ton from less engine weight. So the engine+battery means 6 extra tons. If a diesel truck can haul 20 tons, then the Tesla Semi whould be able to haul 20 - 6 = 14 tons. With this in mind, I think there's enough scenarios where this would work. Overnight charging, while the driver sleeps, carrying low-weight-high-volume cargo and you can do 500 to 1000 miles per day. No, it totally doesn't surpass diesel in all areas. And that "beats rail" should get Elon a ticket straight to jail, but alas, the thing is that this Semi is not totally useless either.
    1
  1124. I was thinking about that. They worded that it's something new & blahblah. Maybe it's work on a WSL 3 ?
    1
  1125. I forgot how it's named in other languages, since I remember it's not the same everywhere, but you have something like that with Traits in PHP. A trait in PHP is a class from which you can get specific methods (of the whole trait) and it will be as if you have copy-pasted the code in your class. Except it is only one source of the code, with the added benefits of statically linking and checking the types and all that jazz.
    1
  1126. And that's exactly the problem. I can't say for certain, but to me it does look like we're heading there, 200 mph, no brakes, and there's no talks no real effort put into the societal parts. All of the people that will be laid off, regardless if its for a good reason or not, if a big part of the population does not have a job or an income, things will be baaad!
    1
  1127.  @PerErikKarlsson  Is less expensive in the same way that a sidewalk for pedestrians is less expensive than a 2 lane proper road with all the signals.
    1
  1128.  @zvezdan956  Ok low level troll, let me try to address you - show the curve - before answering this, I have to ask, is this the only way to accept the globe earth ? After seeing how the sun sets and "looks" to be lower than you at sunrise or sunset, would you trust your eyes when you do see a curve ? And if so, why ? Especially if you're looking through a glass, since you won't be able to survive up there ? - Michelson-Morley - what's there to address ? - Ozone - what's there to address ? - flight paths - what's there to address ??? It's the flat earthers who have to address flights like Sydney to Santiago. And many other things in plain sight, while also not providing any working model for the incredibly idiotic idea of a flat earth.
    1
  1129. That would be pretty bloat-y
    1
  1130. What is wrong with you people ? That's exactly what's said in the video. And much simpler than what you try to explain. Am I missing something ? There's other comments like this too, arguing that somehow the video is incorrect, when in fact it is, or at least what they say is the same as what the video says. Which is if the bloom filter says there's no key, you can trust that and skip to the next level.
    1
  1131. LoL @ the people who suggested another OS or "laughs in [insert another OS]". Good job Brodie on finding the exact cause and sharing it. I didn't knew that cards can seat themselves out of their socket, but apparently that's a thing. The more you know!
    1
  1132. @OpenGL4even: you know you can play Dota2 on Linux, right ?
    1
  1133. @OpenGL4ever Sorry, I errored a bit. I thought that since there is a version where the antihack mechanisms couldn't possible work like you described, then it can totally work on ReactOS just the same. Except that the game will think it's on windows, so it will use those anti-hack measures. It took a bit to click. Mea culpa.
    1
  1134. Isn't it proven already that it's practically impossible to have carbon capture without downsizing using fossil fuels to a level in which the CO2 in the atmosphere starts to lower ? Isn't that scientific ? The scale is as ludicrous as literally every single person on earth having its own aeroplane. Theoretically possible, practically impossible (and really dumb too). Just like carbon capture without transitioning away from fossil fuels. Science isn't just physics!
    1
  1135. Isn't the guy behind SerpentOS still looking for funding ?
    1
  1136. Yeah, that makes more sense, on multiple levels. No idea why they went upside down. Fortunately it doesn't detract from the important information in the video.
    1
  1137. Aye! A lot of really ugly stuff were done in the name of "efficiency"
    1
  1138. HaHa, good one!
    1
  1139.  @HentaiWarhol  Lame
    1
  1140. 19:45 The 7zip benchmark is comprised in two parts: compression and humilliation.
    1
  1141. @ Possible. But it's the only way I'd come back, given how easy it would be for them to kick me out on a whim. If not, well, I wish them happy hunting. Of course, it's easy for me to say this, I'm not in that position. I'm not even in the US. Here in Europe, we actually have some laws that prevent against this type of abuse, and largely, it works. Also if an individual is with high debt or really struggling financially for any reason, I guess that, yeah, it would be hard (or too risky) to negociate like that. I hope they're not in this situation though.
    1
  1142. It's still massively more simple than on a public road on the surface where people and cars and animals can always jump in front of you, some masked by other objects. And they had the time to do the model and train it and tweak it. Since the walls are so close, I don't even think there's a need for specific textures on the walls.
    1
  1143. That argument existed long before Alpine existed. And noone argued that Apline too should be called GNU/Linux. You people are really strawmanning this, what the hell. I expected more from you Chris!
    1
  1144. YES! So happy to see this, though I'm a laptop now, with few chances of building a PC anytime soon. But I sooo wanted to see something like this. If the passive cooler is made properly, with good interfacing (to say so), so it's not constrained by a particular board/chipset/CPU, then you can literally use it for 50 years! Now that's ECO, in my view. Rather high initial cost, but 0 cost (power draw) 0 maintenance and 0 landfill for the rest of it's life makes it the best option for long term. It might need a bit of work and resources for new CPU sizes/platforms, but it should still be uncontested. Of course, it's only feaseable for moderate power CPUs. But a R5 5600X is already at 65W and is quite versatile, so it's not so low-end.
    1
  1145. For GN: if you have the time and curiosity... since you can disable HT per individual core, and, if I'm not mistaken, also each individual core can be disabled completely, could you test a handful of games, to see if using these could notificeably increase performance (in a handful of games, theoretically each will differ from the others by A LOT) or decrease power&temp ? For example, in GTA 5, the CPU could be set to only have 8 cores, all without HT. I realize that this game is a pretty bad example, since it has that stupid 187 FPS limit, but you get the idea. Disabling HT should lead to performance because of less resource contention, while disable a core completely should help with power draw & temps and maybe latency ? Related to this, I'm personally very curious how did the skylake architecture/platform/manufacturing did improve after all these years. Could you take a 10900K, set it to have the same a) core & threads, b) power targets, c) clock frequencies and d) all combinations of the before against a 6600K and 6700K ? So, for example, a 10900K configured to match the 4/4 and 4/8 cores/threads of 6600K and 6700K also with the same frequencies of said CPUs, how much less power it consumes ? Does it perform the same ? On another test, with the same cores/threads and the same power limits, what frequencies and performance does it achieve ? Is that also the same ? To remind here that the 10900K should have some security fixes directly in the hardware. I'm not certain if right now for a 6700K the security fixes would be in software or none at all.
    1
  1146.  @serge5046  Interesting! Thanks!
    1
  1147. Awaiting for the new podcast: tech over deck
    1
  1148. Interesting thing about the interest rates. But I have to wonder... the interest rates are low, in order to increase the economy, right ? All those imports are contributing to economic growth, right ? Is there a possibility that Turkey's economy grows enough that it might jump start (well, jump-recover) the ... uhm... situation ? As in, at one point it allows the interest rate to raise, but still benefit from high economic growth, say 5-10% per year, while the inflation gets down to 2%, so in several years, the effective power of the lira is restored, while the country is much stronger economy/industrial-wise ? I guess, I'm simply asking if all this deficit is actual invesment money or not.
    1
  1149. I was asking myself the same thing. I thought initially that I missed something, as I was doing something else on the other monitor. Oh well
    1
  1150. I saw some videos when the i9 throttle thing was new. Even when throttled, it performed better than the i7 counterpart. So at least they had that. But I think the i7 was throttled as well.
    1
  1151.  @NathanaCentauri  The presentation was good, not excellent. Just the browser support slides alone, that have no mention what they're about is enough to not be able to call this presentaiton "excellent". There were other small issues too. I mean, overall it got the point across, but it can certainly be improved upon. And personally, I think she overly complicated the CSS, when the focus was on different things. That CSS was frankly a bit off-putting. The examples should've been simpler, with more focus on the actual important stuff, like the "has()" selector.
    1
  1152.  @NathanaCentauri  Hey, no problem, glad you liked it, anytime I can help, I'll do my best! Regarding how to cook those eggs... just tell your girlfriend to try something different every day, until you can take a different opinion than your own without it appearing to you as offensive. Especially when that opinion has arguments too. And then just iterate on that. Who knows, maybe, some day, you'll even reply with something productive, that actually moves the discussion forward! Cheers!
    1
  1153. Yeah, that video really is stupid.
    1
  1154.  @DerDop  The only thing booming in Romania is the corruption. Though recently there were quite some findings showed in the press. Maybe, juuust maybe, this year people won't vote the same communist-made corrupts that parasite the entire country. Then it will really boom, there's soo SOO much untapped potential.
    1
  1155. @Gamers Nexus In the comparison to RTX 2060, isn't the initial RTX 2060 priced at $349 MSRP, effectively higher than the launch MSRP of RTX 3060 ? (the 2 years of inflation is negligible). The RTX 2060 TU-104-150-KC (what EVGA calls RTX 2060 KO) relaunch (if I can call it like that?) that was in January 2020, at $300 is ... I would say different. It's one year later, which is one year ago, basically with adjusted prices... Also, RTX 3060 has more VRAM which will get to be significant in the following years, if games evolve in the same trend. And I'm not sure if it consumes less power than RTX 2060, as it was missing from your power charts. It certainly consumes much less than GTX 1080 Ti :)) Overall I agree on it being just nice, not wow, but don't fully agree with the stagnation part. It's still better in price/perf and perf/watt, even if by too little. And simply the fact that it was compared to that Jan 2020 release of failed 2080's is... just weird... I feel like it's cherry picked.
    1
  1156. There was no mention - Sweden is testing this too, and I think it is more developed that what Germany has here. I'm curious how it's going on their end. I also think that people are WAAAY to fast to jump to conclusions here. Nobody should expect this to be done over night. Identify some best areas to install the overhead wires, and only do it there. Electric trucks, fortunately, are coming anyway, as they are decent on shipping low-mass high volume items (like chips, lol). So transport companies will get electric trucks anyway. The overhead wires will enable them to use the trucks on longer distances and for heavier loads. Bit by bit, it can help in the decarbonization. It will certainly not be done by 2030, but it will undoubtebly be better than what it's now.
    1
  1157. Finally a sensible comment. In Elon's defense, he is getting nice contracts for his Boring company, so it's not that stupid for him.
    1
  1158. I do feel the same, though I wasn't around at that time. I mean, while unsuccessful and a bit arrogant, I do think that Mir kicked Wayland into getting things done. And I do have the suspicion that Canonical did intent that. It was either Mir takes off either Wayland gets its sh!t together and becomes usable. Win-win.
    1
  1159.  @JohnSmith-dt5lq  Duuude, please use paragraphs. Most of my YT watching is in the evening when I'm a bit tired too (though not always). Right now I actually cannot stand and read what you wrote without losing my line. No ill-will. Peace!
    1
  1160. Then just pipe into sed 's/D/J/g' and all will be fine 😁
    1
  1161. Well said!
    1
  1162. The V-Ray benchmark result is wrong. It should've been 10.600K
    1
  1163.  @MatSmithLondon  Regarding bounce - we mostly seen "good" cases here. For example, if the rainfall is severe, or maybe if the wind is very high, I can imagine the water coming in weird ways down and then the ... balancer thing starts to tip, if the water it holds isn't static, it can "evacuate" faster / earlier and the coming water from above might come with force, and the tip from one side to another might not finish before it tips back again.
    1
  1164. I guess I do have a bit of an uptime fetish. Several things to mention: - in Windows 10, with quite some hassle and at least the Pro version, you can actually control the updates. As I speak I have 99 days of uptime. I didn't actually wanted to reach this high, since effectively I'm behind the updates, I cannot have (most of) the important ones without a restart. But Windows, as I configured it, doesn't pest me neither to do the updaters, nor to restart. And usually between 1 to 3 months I do the updates and restart. - having a high uptime is a sign of a properly configured system. It shows that you don't have weird leakages or simply bad software. As having a system that you don't have to reinstall (and even reformat the drive). I've never understood the people who got to the conclusion that you have to format + reinstall windows once per year. I've always reinstalled because the old one was too old (like from Windows 98 to XP, from XP to 7, from W7 to W10), not because it wasn't running ok. Windows is bad, but not THAT bad. Anyway, I'm going off topic. - for me at least, not restarting isn't the time to reboot. That is below a minute. Is also opening ALL the apps, and in the same exact state that I left them. Still something that should be below 5 minutes, but I simply like not having to. Some apps don't have the "continue exactly where you left off" feature when restarting them. For this reason, I usually hibernate the laptop instead of shutting down most of the times I'm carrying it around (which is less than 1/week since the pandemic started). I do acknowledge that it's mostly convenience on my part, not actual need. - having the computer open 24/7, if on low power (and low heat) will not damage the components that much, if at all. One power cycle actually might do more damage than 50 hours of uptime (as I said, if the uptime is in a non-stressful manner, with no overclocking and no large amounts of heat). As to why you would do that, some have things open, like torrents, folding at home, or mining. In my case, when I leave it running when I'm sleeping or I'm away, and I'm only keeping it open for torrents, I'm putting it in a custom power mode, which is low power, but with everything still turned on, except the display. This way, it consumes quite little, despite still being "on".
    1
  1165.  @BrodieRobertson  Guilty! Though what I had in mind when I said properly configured is that the performance of the system doesn't degrade over time. To this day, somehow, it's still an issue for some. But, yeah, having the system up-to-date (at least security-wise), is neccessary to call it "properly configured".
    1
  1166. "They sold 4.5 million units, or what our commentors would say - paper launch". BUUUURN! I like how none of the about first 100 comments I saw here mentioned this.
    1
  1167. This was an interesting watch. Informative, but also flawed, in multiple points. Before going point by point, I'd like to say that I am a Linux user and, while I don't go out of my way to bash Electron apps, I'm not a fan of it either, and I prefer to not use them whenever I can. At this moment I think I only use one: Postman, which annoys the hell out of me when it hangs for like 30 seconds, and I will change it soon, once I have more time to check the alternatives and settle on one. Still, Postman I think is trash because it is made like that, not because of Electron. And it annoys me for other reasons too. But regardless, it is very much looking and feeling like a much heavier application for what it should be. I do have an 8 yeah old laptop, which was powerful in 2017, not so much now, but it's not trash either. One thing I must point out - I am using apparently a lot of software that has an Electron app. But I don't use the app, I use what is sane to me - a simple browser tab, in my browser. I was using this before Electron was a thing, so I kind of happened to be like that, before deciding to not use Electron if I can. Why not use Electron ? Some time ago MS Teams had a bug which let remote code execution within it, because of bad sandboxing. That's when I knew I'll never install it, as running it in the browser I can be much more sure that it doesn't have access to my system. Especially after finding out that Discord for YEARS used an extremely outdated version of Electron. Imagine how secure that was! And the performance penalty is there, I don't want it. By only having those directly in the browser (seriously, why are people not using this ?) I have almost 0 disk space used, much less security issues / stress, much less RAM used. So I feel quite immune to the "either Electron either nothing" threat, though I do understand it. For me it didn't enable me in any way to use Linux. As IDE I use JetBrains. On the performance side... that example with the SwiftUI and the conclusion that Electron might be faster than native ... I am soooo NOT buying that. I call 100% skill issue or just something related to SwiftUI at that point in time. Even the first update it says it swapped one component from SwiftUI Text to SwiftUI TextEditor. And apparently it does the rendering using the CPU ? Disable hardware GPU accelerated rendering on a browser and watch the same pain there too. You can't really say that native in general might be slower just from one example like that. Chrome, the only way to efficiently render text (without being John Carmack), really ? Talk about blowing things way out of proportion. In the end, I don't like Electron for the same reason I don't like Flatpaks and snaps. Having everything bundled. In case of flatpaks and snaps, I'd rather have a statically-linked executable. In case of Electron I'd rather simply use my browser. Having one embedded will always be a problem to me. Maybe with servo it will get to be less of an issue. Still, I'm not thrilled on having JS either, though for simple applications it is fine. I would still like something that can be more efficient. Not just in CPU usage, but also in RAM usage. A waste is still a waste. Even with the above, I don't hate Electron for existing. I do kind of hate it becoming the norm. It's like AGAIN we forget all the years of lessons we learned before, most of everything we've learnt and built for something that's short-term easier. Maybe PWAs will become a thing in this lifetime, and we can stop shipping an almost full browser with every app.
    1
  1168. LoL wut ?
    1
  1169. Given that it's been like that for ... 5 decades ? More ? and how easy is to write a prompt (compared to what others bothered to add in their programs, which most barely use) I think this is barely, if at all, the issue/reason.
    1
  1170. Interesting to see what others said. I have 2 things to add: 1) in regards to a language being high-level: if it has the ability to abstract implementation (in any way), then it can be considered a high level language. It's not the only defining factor of a high-level language, but it's a very important one. Having abstractions allows you to make the code easier to write, by being more human-readable and more compact, which are clearly (some of) the things that high level languages are wanted for (the reason they were created in the first place). C does have that, in functions. So, for me, it's clearly a high level language. In the grand scheme of languages, yeah, it probably is the lowest high-level language. But because you can abstract things away, it's still a high level language. Hell, if you want it, you could program a runtime for it and make it behave like a higher level language (of course, by limiting yourself to only use what was implemented for the runtime). 2) SQL is not a programming language. The high vs low only applies to programming languages. Ok, scripting languages too, though, by convention they're always high level (no need to create a scripting language to be low level). SQL, HTML, YAML etc do not qualify.
    1
  1171. I guess that I could add that having direct memory access is a low-level feature. If we talk again about C, that would explain why it's said to be a low, high or medium level language. It has both high-level and low-level features. And in the high-level department, it's pretty poor, as the many languages that came after have more abstractions and helpers for the programmer.
    1
  1172. Greed and confort! The vast majority of people which choose confort time and again are enabling the greedy folks to thrive.
    1
  1173. I see this as simply not great examples of what can be done. Like, in multiple occasions, the idea was to show that you can use CSS "has()", but it got filled with lots of grid stuff and other. Which is not mandatory, things can be done differently. It is, I guess, an insight that in some (many?) situations, this can get to gnarly CSS. I would've done these examples by starting with the base html & css already done, and only adding the interactive parts. The toggle and testimonials for example, they could've been done with easier to see/understand HTML and CSS. And actually just focus on the has() and/or checked parts (I think :active could've worked too, if you don't want to use form elements)
    1
  1174. I lost it at Marxism - Stallmanism =))
    1
  1175. I'm going to bet that price/performance for 2080 Ti will be even worse. However, it will be the fastest on the market, so you might want to buy it for that reason.
    1
  1176. I can't wait for the rewrite in Zig
    1
  1177.  @snowe..  Couldn't agree more that Firefox will still continue without Google's money too. Because a lot of that money is wasted on some type of people and useless projects (I'll let the read guess of which kind). Who knows, without Google's money, maybe Mozilla will get rid of those people and have a chance of getting relevant again when it has only engineers and ACTUAL free speech activits. Which might get them more funding in the future, if people see that their money isn't wasted anymore. And/or if they make a separate place/location/category to donate directly to the Firefox and Thunderbird devs, I'm sure it will actually attract enough funding to maintain the current level they have.
    1
  1178. @CrimSun Even if GN did the benchmarks with the delided version, wouldn't the results (fps, times etc) be the same ? Just with worse thermals ?
    1
  1179. The difference isn't only in compiled, JIT and interpreted. JS is also weak typed, while Java is strong typed. Weak typing means you have to check the type at run time, when, say, doing a+2. In Java this will work directly, no other checks done at run time (and a compile time error if the type mismatches).
    1
  1180. Hey, I'm not a teenager! I could use more sleep though...
    1
  1181.  @YeeLeeHaw  What the hell is an EUC ? What does PEV means ?
    1
  1182.  @YeeLeeHaw  Thanks! I searched a bit on wikipedia and found references. Yeah, from what I understood PEV is a umbrella term for segways, e-scooters, unicycles and others like that.
    1
  1183. The negativity is that it won't work, and they know it. Once you scale everything up, nothing will work anymore, the forces are too great to be controlled. In short, it's a scam and they know it.
    1
  1184. If everything is just a blob and all versions of a file is stored separately, what does the "Resolving deltas" do ? It can be seen at 6:37
    1
  1185. A minor correction - what Louis described as "valuing a broken Macbook" is actually "valuing FIXING broken Macbooks". I get the dramatisation, and in the end it doesn't change THAT MUCH the discourse, but there is a non-trivial distinction between a simple object that is trivial to replace (and thus insane to be obsessed about in this comparison) and an occupation,hobby,habit maybe even an ideal (hard to describe exactly). And I do think it matters to underline the distinction. I don't think (I hope) that many people would value a commodity object over something like their own health. (well, some might, either from a lot of emotional attachment or if the object is very expensive, but then the object is no longer commodity IMO). However, there's a lot of people who do identify themselves with their work, what they do, what they provide and who might prioritise that over their personal health. The main idea to take from this is that if you really care about that work, about what you do, what you (can) provide, for the longer term, then you have to take care of your health, otherwise you might "fall" too early and not be able to do what you love most.
    1
  1186. There's a very rare case where you might want to rotate the display but you can't actually rotate the display/monitor itself, so having the ability to rotate through software helps. Think of a hospital patient forced to stay on a side, with the bed leaned at some angle. Ok, probably it won't use 78.3 degrees, but if you do any rotation, it can't fault to have access to do it in any degree.
    1
  1187. Well, at least you got 2080 Ti at launch. So you had 2 full years of top quality. All in all, not the worst choice there.
    1
  1188. Unless you only ordered a beer or a Coke and stayed for an hour, 20% is too f'ing much. I don't live in the USA, but if that's normal, that's insanely stupid.
    1
  1189. I mean, if it's that insecure how are they protected from a former car manufacturer employee giving some information on how to connect to a technically able friend that can easily come near your car and hack it ? And, of course, brutally rape you in some parking ?
    1
  1190. While the Musk fans are annoying as hell (I had to scroll so much on CNBC's video to see some normal people), there are apparently 2 main great/novel things here, though I can't really tell by how much: 1) apparently $53 million for almost one mile of tunnel (+ "stations") IS a very low price. Of course, the tunnels are as small as they can get (can't fit a bus/minivan or any kind of trains). Since apparently tunnels for subways start at $350 million / mile and can go over $1 billion, that $53 is impressive. Unless I'm missing something. 2) they do have drivers for now, but I think that's exactly the point of this tunnel - to jump start (if that term can be used anymore) the autonomous driving. On the tunnels you don't have the possibility of an idiot person running to cross the road, so this will be the fastest way to get approvals and legislation done in the matter. In the long run, Tesla could get to be a major "ride sharing" aka taxi company. Also car as a service.
    1
  1191. Yeah, regarding 3.1 I was thinking the same. They can simply not use all drivers and implement them themselves. Either as a kernel or userland one.
    1
  1192.  @keco185  I know this is one year old, but I can't help myself. Digging a tunnel for a high speed train is not half way towards a hyperloop. It's more like 5%. Yes, 5 (five) percent. The amount of money to build and run a hyperloop is extreme. Getting and maitaining that vacuum ... is insanely hard. As hard as the protection of the tube, be it underground or overground will have to be. And high speed rail is already extremely expensive, making it somewhat work only in very densely populated areas. A hyperloop is easily 10 times the cost of that. I don't think we'll get to 700 km of hyperloop worldwide by 2050, it's that unpractical of an idea. All the fuss about it now is mostly money laundering "raising" investment from other billionaires or corrupt governments.
    1
  1193.  @terrydaktyllus1320  You cannot take the slightest of criticism, but expect to actually have a discussion ? A debate ? You didn't have the bare minimum courtesy of reading what I said (and I didn't wrote a book, to say it's too much) and then you have THE NERVE to tell me to stick to the topic ? Suggesting that you don't go in a full rant when you have no idea of the reasons the other people had is "taking orders" ? How delusional is that ? Are you training for mental gymnastics olympics ? Or you're really that immature ? By fully dismissing my arguments over getting triggered on something really benign shows much about your attitude and communications skills. If you keep it like that, you're wasting your time and the time of those that you engage with. Please stop.
    1
  1194. Neutral or no pronouns sounds like a good idea, in the context of over-the-Internet-in-text-form collaborating. And, yes, whatever side someone votes is indeed irrelevant. That's the "politics" part that people say that it should be kept out. Although FOSS itself is political, whatever else has nothing to do with a software project should be left out. On number #4 ... yes. Pineapple or pizza is totally irrelevant when you develop Firefox. As such is spam and if somebody insists on doing it, it should be booted off the project. For that, it should either be completely outside the project (like here on YT, not in a github issue) or maybe, in a "off-topic, you are on your own" forum section.
    1
  1195.  @BrodieRobertson  Call me pedantic, but not being hip and being obsolete are different things to me.
    1
  1196. Holy moly, the amount of people so SO eager to point out that freedom is political, but never acknowledge / mention that the "political" in the OP (and many other comments) is about the ones that have nothing to do with that particular software and software in general. Like what party is better in whatever country. Or what rights some people should have. Or that some campaign needs support. Or that some kids in Africa are starving. All of those should be off-topic. At most I can see something like raising funds for some humanitarian stuff, but that should be a small thing to the side, not something to be debated.
    1
  1197. Sooo, is there a command to list all the packages installed ? Then also list all the updates available ? Haven't installed Gentoo yet, I want to have several days available for it :D On the topic of not having gentoo installed yet... does anyone know if it's a bad (or impossible) idea to install Gentoo on a bootable USB drive and load2ram at boot ? I have a single NTFS parition and I really don't want to rebuilt it or risk bricking the Windows I have. It's also quite full. I also have plenty of ram, so loading the OS into the RAM while also running a RAMDisk is totally doable.
    1
  1198. Don't know if anyone, especially from GN will see this, but real feedback: too much / too many disclaimers. Too much meta talk. I understand why, but the bottom line is that it's just tiring and all over the place. Just say the disclaimer ONCE, show a worst case scenario why it can be bad, then just go on and do the data / the actual topic of the video. I really feel like this video could've been 10 minutes shorter.
    1
  1199. Hey GN, thank you for the awesome work you do! I have a little request: can you, from time to time, mention other games that use the same engine that you're currently highlighting/speaking about ? I'd say it's useful information, as not everybody knows them by heart. Thank you!
    1
  1200. Well said. I don't agree with Brodie on that statement. He totally missed the point that clamping down harder on tracking will only make the website owners and ad agencies also try harder to get around it, usually by implementing even worse stuff. What the CTO said that if there's an alternative, business can start using the alternative, which will detract from the "finding ways around it".
    1
  1201.  @BrodieRobertson  Of course the companies are interested in not being regulated. But it's not for them to decide that. That's why the regulations exist in the first place, because otherwise they wouldn't be respected. And the idea that's proposed here is exactly the difference between "regulated" and "regulated into the ground". At least perception-wise. I'm sure that any company that does a good job can do so and survive without (very) targeted ads. Still, the proposed solution (which I think is also the only actual solution proposed) allows them to have decently targeted ads. Making ad spending for them somewhat effective. Otherwise it will either be something illegal (bypassing privacy rights or regulations, if they appear) or it will be random targeting, making ads much more ineffective. Which might make them panic. It's normal to first create the means to behave decently, and then to enforce behaving decently, because you have the means to. Without something like this proposed solution, the "behave decently" is to basically not have targeted ads. Which is basically not an option for these companies. Maybe will not be a bad thing, but realistically, that will not happen anytime soon, nobody will come that hard on them.
    1
  1202. In Gentoo's case, I think it's a good indication of things to come. It gets you to the right mindset needed to have using this OS. And I guess it helps a little, since some things you'll know already where to change them from (like the locale, timezone etc).
    1
  1203. It very very sad that this is still solid advice after 50 years of mainstream computers. At least we don't have the horrible horrible fickledness of 90s and prior computers, but it's still a real shame, a sign of immaturity of the industry that it's still not so reliable.
    1
  1204. ​ @APopov  I don't know, in Europe there's a surge in microcars. I'd say that for small cars the price is the barrier, not the battery capacity/range.
    1
  1205.  @willardorwud  Thank you, finally, somebody saying it correctly, that the problem is the other issues (which are mostly political) but which have nothing to do with the project.
    1
  1206. Apparently this was recorded in like august (more or less) last year
    1
  1207. Right! A great video, indeed. This also poses the question of how you can optimize the workload you have. For example, I'm curious how much extra processing power that spreadsheet loading&writing is taking. That could surely been made more efficient by simply appending to a CSV file (using barebones OS functions of open() and write() ) the current uptime, a comma, uptime in hours and a line ending. Or, even better, simply "touch start_time" and "touch time_a; touch time_b" (to have the same "backup") which are simply OS functions which should provide minimal processing. The uptime could then be computed manually by seeing the latest modified time between time_a and time_b and substracting the modified time of start_time. Since this is a test, it doesn't matter that much, you can say that the workload was simply heavier. But for a real application, searching optimized code might provide a really big benefit.
    1
  1208. Of course CSS doesn't do engineering math. That's not the point of this talk. The point is that many clients will ask for some fancy stuff, and the idea is that there's quite many of them that can be done without JS. And knowing when not to use JS is useful, maybe you can have multiple pages or the whole website without JS. That doesn't mean you shouldn't use it when it's clearly the way to go.
    1
  1209. I'm kind of sad that games targeting Proton make the most sense right now, and that's definitely what the majority of developers have to do. Hopefully, with SteamOS gaining popularity in the gaming community, it might make developing native Linux games more worthwhile (both in the market-share department and in the ease/usefulness of developing), you know, to be able to unlock all the resources that the hardware has. And if SteamOS does get big, that means that hardware manufacturers will finally (have to) think about drivers/support for Linux, which will make switching to Linux easier, with less/no concerns about hardware compatibility, which will further increase market share... ok, I'll stop babbling, but I do feel like this will be a big possitive loop and I can't wait to see it unfolding.
    1
  1210. Ideally one would stop caring what others think of it, if they don't care enough to actually make a proper image of it. Or would challenge them if they say something stupid that is based on assumptions. But I have to admit, sometimes it's simply tiresome to deal with it. But I still think that's the good way forward
    1
  1211. Yeah, if they really wanted to let blacks or anyone else have more voice (so to speak), they could've simply SHUT THE F UP for two or three days.
    1
  1212.  @justanothercomment416  Out of curiosity, do you remember when you used it last time ? What version ? What framework/library/CMS (if any) ?
    1
  1213.  @scottdrake5159  Search Brodie Robertson here on YouTube, he has a video called "How to never improve wayland" (or something like that) released about 1 week ago. In there he details how the AppImages main developer is so antiwayland as expressed by it in issues, comments and discussion threads.
    1
  1214. There were videos from some of the big(ish) YouTubers that have Raspberry Pi content, so I wouldn't call it stealth launch.
    1
  1215.  @oggilein1  Damn!
    1
  1216.  @act.13.41  However it is spelled, it distinctly doesn't have a "T" in it. It triggers me everytime I hear Lunduke spell it. :(
    1
  1217.  @act.13.41  I'm interested in the content. And I can survive the annoyance ... every so often.
    1
  1218. Awesome name :))
    1
  1219.  @jeffreysims1249  "small 2 seat model" Are you blind ? How is this small ? It's as big as 4 seat cars.
    1
  1220. Thanks for the replies guys! I only seen/heard the term in Mental Outlaw's videos and I thought it's something Gentoo related :))
    1
  1221. Ok, real question, why is Gentoo clown world ? Or it was just in the early years ? Genuinely interested. I just switched to it several months ago (directly from Windows 10). It's pretty neat, as I expected.
    1
  1222.  @nlight8769  Oh, wow, things got very complicated too fast. The problem is actually much simpler. It's the word "performance". For some people it's not immediately obvious that it's about "something (a task) done in an amount of time". Well, where time is involved. That's the thing, it doesn't explicitly say the metric used. And if the metric is not explicitly said or obvious from the context, people make assumptions and that's how we got into this topic :D But performance is very analogous to speed. In our case the compile time is similar to lap time. And speed is measured in kmph (some use miles per hour, but we've grown out of the bronze age). In our case it would be the not-so-intuitive compiles per hour. One could say that instructions run per second could also be a metric, but it has 2 problems: a) nobody knows how many instructions are run/needed for a particular compile, though I guess it can be found out and b) not all instructions are equal, and they NEED to be equal in order to give predictible estimations. For speed, all the seconds are equal and all the meters are also equal. Here's another tip - degradation implies that it's worse and that the something degraded is *reduced*. If someone tells you something degraded by 80%, you KNOW that it's now at 20% of what it was (and not 180%). And something degraded by 100% would mean it's reduced by 100%, aka there's nothing left. Lastly, correlating to the above - When the performance of anything degraded "fully", so to speak, we say it's 0 performance. Not that it takes infinity time.
    1
  1223. But does Devin have access to coffee and/or Coke/Pepsi ? No ? Then, it can't compete.
    1
  1224. To be fair, the way its day and statues were removed was just wrong. Typical leftards overreach. Yeah, he wasn't a good man, but he's remembered not for his morality (which, for his time, wasn't that bad either) but for his exploratory prowess. Getting these back is a sign for normalcy. It's just that there's 500,000 more important things first.
    1
  1225. The appeal of the game is similar to games like sudoku. A bit of a challenge, a bit of exercise, and a chance to learn new words. Good for times when you have nothing else to do, like when going to work and staying in a bus for 40 minutes, or when you have to attend to your sister's wedding.
    1
  1226. @kaizen8808 Hello Ancient one! How was being in the same math class with Nebuchadnezzar ?
    1
  1227. Well, not 10000x faster. It was 10000x faster than a previously-built graphene chip. But it will be significantly better. And it seems it's not just bluff: https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/164301-graphene-transistors-based-on-negative-resistance-could-spell-the-end-of-silicon-and-semiconductors 400 GHz, that does sound nice. It can still get to 8K 244Hz even though it will be just 100 times faster :)
    1
  1228. I'll be waiting for the based.linux version
    1
  1229. I really hate how the tabs look now. I was on a very classic title bar + menu bar + tabs bar, with lots of tabs. Now, before they were gray, with nice borders and clearly delimitated. Now they're bigger, whiter, much uglyer, shorter on the horizontal scale, things like the playing audio tab is now a stupid text which doesn't even fit, while before it was an instantly recognizable icon. So in the end the whole bar is much uglier, I have less information and it's harder to find stuff in it. Like actually seeing which tab is playing audio when another tab is opened and the whole tab shifts and I have to go back to the tab with the video. I have 0 (read: ZERO) benefits from this change and only headaches. Not huge ones, in the end I can live with it, but the fact that it's all for absolutely nothing makes it 10 times worse. Instead of useless changes, how about separate stop and reload buttons in the address bar that we had before Firefox ?? How about allowing to customize the address bar so things like "bookmark page" and "Reader view" can be taken out and maybe back, forward, stop, reload and home can be added in ? I know, I might be able to change some with themes. I didn't bother.
    1
  1230. Dissapointed that there was no mention that the overflow happens because strcpy has no idea of the "receiving" string/buffer size, so it simply copies the whole string, aka it starts to copy everything from the start of that char* address, until it reaches a null byte.
    1
  1231.  @ghost-user559  Correct. Haven't watched the channels mentioned, but if in a video all it does is to read an article, that's not transformative.
    1
  1232. I take issue with Hollywood's "job" of only providing entertainment (as said at 2:58). When it's about Oscars, it's not just entertainment, but the films that crossed the threshold into the "art" section. Art which is so hard to find nowadays when we ARE flooded by very cheap creative-and-cultural-wise entertainment. Back to the point, Oscar awards should be about art, not entertainment. Hollywood can do whatever they like (that includes NOT doing just entertainment), of course, with the risk of people not giving an ounce of F about it. And, yes, giving (or not giving) an award based mostly (if not fully) on the narrative is ruining the idea of the award. Oh well, they did it to themselves.
    1
  1233. Yup. I know that Sweden is testing that, adding an overhead cable on some highway, on the first lane, so they can have electric-driven trucks. Heard of that about 2 years ago, I think, but haven't heard more yet. To be frank, I haven't searched for either, so for all I know, it might be already in place and used by actual trucks. Also, in these videos, I think they go a bit too much on the idea. Yeah, it's overhyped, because Elon is Elon. But the Semis themselves I think that the can make actual sense in a few scenarios. Like hauling toilet paper or similarly high volume little weight cargo. And for short to medium trips (up to 800 km / 500 miles). One metric that Musk showed was that 80% of hauls are below 250 miles. I haven't seen anyone dispute that. So, there's certainly places where a cheaper fuel, more eco friendly, less noisy, less stinky and locally-polluting truck does make sense, including economically so. What Musk said that it's better than Diesel in all regards... yeah, no, not even close. I think it might get there in 20 years, where Diesel will be required only in quite niche situations (hauling in winter somewhere very high for example. Or actual 2000 miles trips in the middle of nowhere). I do expect that in 20 years the batteries, at worst, will be a bit better, a bit cheaper and there will be enough charging stations or, for these trucks, maybe even battery swap stations, so they don't have to be fast charged which does degrade the battery a bit faster. Unless the actual battery as compared to the usable battery, is much bigger in capacity, which I kind of doubt. Anyway, I expect, at minimum, in 20 years, to have a 500 miles fully loaded truck with, say, only 5 tons of battery and a cargo hold of 3-4 tons less than a diesel truck.
    1
  1234.  @mnomadvfx  I agree with you, but even if magically everybody started investing into trains, trucking won't disappear in 20 years. What if you need a single 15t haul ASAP ? You'd have to be very lucky to have a train ready to go in a timely manner in the same direction. Having an entire train to haul 15 tons will totally not be feaseable. Even so, in practice this won't be the case. Because, collectively, humans are quite dumb, to put it mildly. Just look at the people elected as leaders and you'll see why. People are not able to choose what's best for them long term.
    1
  1235. What is/are the confusion(s) ? Anything we can help to clear ?
    1
  1236. On the bright side, when there's a problem, everybody will have that problem and such, a fix should come quickly.
    1
  1237.  @EngineeringExplained  So that means that Formula 1 is LESS than Formula 2, right ? I should watch more Formula 2... sucks when you don't know math.
    1
  1238. I'm just waiting for the hardware to get better, so when compiling firefox gets down to 1 minute and everything else compiles in several seconds, we'll all switch back to the true best way of distribution: source code.
    1
  1239. I think that waiting for all the releases that this year has to offer in terms of CPU and GPU, and only then do a build video, that would be the way to go. For any type of build.
    1
  1240.  @tandemcharge5114  Thunderf00t is not perfect, but his track record is still much better than Elon's is. For me, his worst video is the one which he titled that Tesla's batteries suck, which he then sets to prove that Li-Ion batteries have inherent limitations and are not a one-size-fits-all solution that some think it is. The video itself wasn't that bad, but the title was 100% bad and clickbait. Other than that, he's quite on point, even though his style might not be so pleasing for everybody. Also, regarding to your initial comments. The Hyperloop is one extremely good example of the MASSIVE bullshit some people like Elon Musk and other billionaires knee-deep in money laundering like to spout. The hyperloop or maglevs-in-near-vacuum-tubes is extremely expensive and unpractical. If you cannot fathom that, it's about the same as every single person on the earth, all 8 billion of us, having a personal airplane and using it daily. That kind of ludicrous. When actual good solutions exist, but are just not implemented. Maglevs without vacuum tubes are already extremely expensive and only really economically viable in extremely high density population areas. Vacuum tubes increase the cost and complexity by an order of magnitude. Why is it so freaking hard to understand this, when it's so easy and in plain sight ????
    1
  1241.  @tandemcharge5114  Hey, thanks for the reply. Sorry if I look like a thread necromancer, but for me 3 months is not that much, and the topic at hand is still relevant. The "everybody gets to have an airplane", I wasn't explicit enough. It's something like: it would make more sense, economically, for every single person to have a plane, than having, say, 10 000 Km of hyperloop (which, of course, wouldn't benefit all people on the world). I guess it's a silly example, but I'm just trying to illustrate just how enourmous the costs are and just how impractical. Also, if it would be practical in, say, 100 years, it should be marketed as such. It totally isn't. The claims are off-the-charts bullshit. On the Tf00t vs SpaceX I'm not very sure. I saw one video of Tf00t which critiqued SpaceX and their claims. I had some doubts about it. Then he made a response, and it made sense to me. But I'm still not so convinced (like I am on Hyperloop), so I won't comment there. Cheers!
    1
  1242. You should try the Airbus A380. Compared to Intel's A380, the Airbus one is so fast, it feels like flying!
    1
  1243. That ship has sailed a long time ago. Too many people just call it that and/or use the term like that, so to a casual, you're really splitting hairs.
    1
  1244.  @L0gicalPsych0  Yup, you are correct. Sadly, convenience often ... who am I kidding, ALWAYS trumps over correctness, when we're talking mainstream public. That's why I'm saying it's a losing battle. To be fair, when the idea is to get across that you're using an OS which is neither Windows, nor MacOS, nor Android, but uses the Linux kernel... simply calling it Linux ... it DOES the job. The contexts where you would say "I'm running Debian" and the other person is like "Oh, Linux. Nice" and you then go "WRONG! It's GNU/Hurd" are really, really niche contexts.
    1
  1245. An educational video you say ... ? Well, knowledge is power ... and power corrupts ... and that is dangerous! You should make content that dumbs down your audience, that's never going to get removed.
    1
  1246. Eventually certainly. But this year I think you'll see it only on Arch and Gentoo. I guess NixOS too
    1
  1247. Here's an idea for the card comparison chart, to get rid of less intuitive negative percentages: make it to basically be 2 graphs, put side to side. So, for 16:45 left side would show "7800 XT better by (%)" while the right side would show "6800 XT better by (%)". And in the left side, say, for Starfield at 1440, instead of -9.4% it would show (78.6 / 71.2) = 10.4% improvement. Do you think this can work ?
    1
  1248. This installer only works if you're in UK
    1
  1249. Yeah, I think that getting Linus Torvalds to adopt a language for the Linux kernel is like the greatest ad a language can have.
    1
  1250.  @NonTrova0101  Security and privacy are not the same thing. And on the privacy front, an open source code base is by definition miles away better than a closed source one. Unless you install the closed source one on a computer with no Internet connection (now nor ever). Yeah, you're not auditing the full code by yourself, but it is still looked at by some people and they usually do shout out when something fishy is there. Look at Audacity for an example.
    1
  1251.  @connorskudlarek8598  Yup! It was visible at other times too. And it's 24th, not 23th.
    1
  1252. Thank you for the computation! If this is used by your desktop computer, I guess it's in the logic of "while I sleep or I'm away, I can put the computer to work!" In this case, the original cost of the CPU can be completely deducted. Still, you won't use it 24/24h, more like 1-8h/24h, in average. So you will get at most 1/3 of those $3.14 a day. Since not everybody has Threadripper, it's more like $0.1 to $2 at most. In theory it's still a profit, in practice it kind of doesn't worth the effort.
    1
  1253. Code compresses really well ? Are you sure ? Do you have a source for that ?
    1
  1254. I do agree that what DoJ proposes is an overreach. And I think it's why it will not pass/continue. However, I totally disagree that it will kill the web or anything remotely close to that. There's plenty of innovation done outside Google. If Chrome disappears today, sites and products won't break, as Chromium can serve them with absolutely no issues. If Chrome disappears today, we won't be stuck in the current version of the web, it will continue to be improved. Maybe slower, but we'll be absolutely fine. I hate this type of argument so much. That if we don't sell our soul to the devil (figuratively) then we won't be able to do anything. Ok, maybe 10 or 15 years ago it might've been closer to the truth, but even then I don't agree that we wouldn't have have the benefits of the modern day browsers without Chrome. It would've taken longer most likely. But nobody would've died because of that. But it's even less of a concern now, with thousands of non-google engineers contributing to web standards and browser code. I wouold also not discount Firefox so quickly. It's true that most of Mozilla's revenue comes from Google, but a lot of the revenue is wasted on useless projects (usually DEI stuff) and on the woke staff itself that managed to get the leadership. Firefox developers don't get a lot of cash. Not getting the money from Google might actually be better for Mozilla and Firefox, as it might be freed from the woke management and steered back into competence and relevancy by engineers and ACTUAL free speech activists. And if they make a dedicated Firefox-devs only donation category, I'm sure that there will be people chiming in (myself included), enough to at least keep the current funding the developers get.
    1
  1255. To perform the same, all of their timings should boil down to the same amount of seconds (well, nanoseconds). Beyond this, I actually don't know if the frequency actually matters anymore, just by itself. Though the bandwidth is estimated solely on it. And there's this thing that if it's DDR it reads/writes both when the signal is rising or when it's going down making me think it does matter. Especially in bulk reading/writing. In any case, in your example, the 3600 MHz has better timings. The CL one is the same, but the others are better for the 3600 MHz kit.
    1
  1256.  @fulconandroadcone9488  Yeah, that can certainly happen. That's why sprints are, theoretically, set in stone. And the stories in it groomed/refined so, again, theoretically, you know what you have to do and there's no change of plans. But management gotta management sometimes...
    1
  1257. It's easy how he got there - 90ms mean response time, meaning you can do about 11 requests in a second. 10 if you round it. So, in order to have 0 extra latency, he just said that you can do 10 requests per second per core. It's true that in reality, that 90ms response time is more like 40ms CPU time and 50ms waiting for stuff to be loaded, like a database query response, or the SSD to return file data and so on. So a core could handle more than a request at a time, but it depends on the CPU time vs iowait time proportions just how much it can do. And after a point, it can do multiple at the same time, but there might be a bit of latency on all of them. Still, it's just easier to compute the way he did it, and also has some headroom, just in case.
    1
  1258. LoL
    1
  1259. Some will come, don't you worry. The Firefox one being a prime example. RedHat had made a terminal bot/helper AI in the newest RHEL. I just hope things will come late enough that the bubble would soften/pop and will actually be less invasive and maybe even useful, not the flustercuck that is now.
    1
  1260. Amen!
    1
  1261. Just saying, an AI would've seen and removed the extra "is" from the thumbnail title, just sayin' ...
    1
  1262. Florida - Whistle is so unsubtle (and uncreative, might I add) it shouldn't even be on this list. There are dozens better picks (read more comments to see them, I'm too lazy to make a list)
    1
  1263. I'm totally ok with putting protections in place so that sneezing on my computers won't blow it up. Or pressing / and Enter by mistaken instead of just / followed by a folder name, when running an rm -rf command. Still, the important part is maintaining control. With an option or two, even extra confirmation promts if they're REALLY neccessary, let me snap the leg out of my system and beat it to death. As long as the control is still there and it doesn't involve things exaggerated requirements like manually compiling instead of simply using the installed program, then I'm pretty ok.
    1
  1264.  @christianbarnay2499  Realistically, there's still a lot of sites that need JS. Or to put it the other way, only a small portion of websites can go full JS-less. The vast majority of them, the actual problem at hand, is the websites that can use 20kB of JS instead of 1.4MB of JS. And learning new tricks like the ones presented here can help with that.
    1
  1265. The way I see it, the main thing, the main advantages of this "do one thing and do it well" is for having easy composition and less/no code duplication. That is, it's not important to follow it to the letter, but it's a nice, short way of conveying the goals of achieving several benefits that I'll try to list below: That program or library has to be small enough so it can be used in a chain of commands or inside a bigger app, with a minimal footprint. If everything follows this philosophy, then it's also easy to replace without having a depency hell, coupling issues and performance struggles. This small enough pushes the developer to try to be as narrowly focused in the thing it's doing, and when it does need more things to do also try to see if it can use another program or library. This also allows projects to have few developers, since they can only focus on their specific program and domain. To give an example (I don't know if the reality is anywhere close to what I'll present, but it seems like a nice example), the Lynx browser. Their devs can simply use internally curl to fetch the resources and only deal with building the DOM and rendering it. Internally curl might also use a ssl library and a tcp library to handle the lower level networking and only focus on the HTTP & related standards. In this example, if HTTP 3 gets released (woohoo) it might get implemented into Lynx with minimal effort, by just updating the curl library (well, usually minimal, there might be breaking changes or new stuff to take care of). Do Lynx developers have to care about HTTP 3? Nope. Do they have to care about available encryption hashes used for HTTPS connections ? Nope. Do they have to care about opening sockets and their timeouts and buffer sizes ? Nope. They can focus on their specific thing. And that means they can also know very little of the underlying features, meaning less experienced developers can start to contribute, the project has a lower barrier of entry. Having a smaller project/library also allows having manageable configurations. I mean, it can be made to be very configurable (including being modular) without getting overwhelming, because it's in the context of a rather small program/library. Another interesting example is ffmpeg. As a program and cli command, it's actually pretty big. But it's still made so it's easy to be used with other tools and programs. Of course, in the real world, the separation cannot be made perfectly. For some developer the big thing A would be split into b, c and d. Another developer would see A split into b, c, d, e and f, and each also split into 2-3 smaller programs, with one of them being used in 2 places (say, program t is used by both b and e). As you can see, technicallly the second split is better from the "do one thing and do it well", but it's also much more complex. This cannot go ad-infinitum. Theoretically, it would be nice if we'd have only system functions and calls and we'd only run a composition of them. But in the real life it's never going to happen. Also in the real life, the example above, a third developer might see the split of program A into B, C, D and E, with B being say 80% of what b does in the vision of the first developer + 50% of what c does in the vision of the first developer. And so on. And there would be arguments for all approaches that make sense. Lastly, doing one thing and well allows for easier optimisation. Especially in the context of a program or library to be used in bigger projects or commands, having it well optimized is important. And because the program/library is rather small and focused on one thing, that is, it's into a single domain usually, it's easier for the developer to go deep into optimisation. Of course in the extreme cases, having one big monolithic program can allow for better overall optimisation, but you'd also have to code everything yourself. Regarding the Linux kernel, I'd say that it achieves the goals of "do one thing and do it well" perfectly because it's modular (and each module does one thing) and all of them play nice with each other and with the userspace. The problem that I see with systemd is that their binaries, while neatly split, are basically talking their own language. They cannot be augmented or replaced by the normal tools we already have (well, sometimes they can be augmented). Somebody would have to create a program from scratch just to replace, say, journald. And this replacement program would be just for that. It's this "we're special and we need special tools" thing that is annoying. Ten years from now if one of the binaries is found with massive flaw, well... good luck replacing it. Oh, and it's critical and you cannot run systemd without it, so you have to replace ALL the system management tools ? Oh well, warnings were shot, those who cared listened...
    1
  1266.  @desecratedredacted5351  Can't tell if you're a troll or that stupid. Good job, I guess ?
    1
  1267.  @istvantorok4819  To be fair, at least in Windows 10, if you tune it just a bit, you can have a very good and fast system too. Before switching to Linux, I had Windows 10 on my laptop. At one moment I reached exactly 100 days of uptime, at which point I made a screenshot then went to install the updates and restart, to not risk being that guy who gets a st pid ransomware or something.
    1
  1268. @ Surely more than on Wayland. Because it was something new that was needed to be developed (and it wasn't a replacement of a big and old codebase, though it was a reimagining of another system, they went over that quite fast. While on Wayland, the need and pressure, and the ease of going forward, much more difficult. Still way slower than normal, but the context of the two couldn't have been much more different.
    1
  1269. Well, LTS means long term support. The "more stable" part is a byproduct of that. Other than that, it's stable by "best effort" not something guaranteed, the way I see it.
    1
  1270. At this point I have to question if these are just lunatics or if somebody or something is behind. Too many attacks and takeovers. That, surprise-surprise, benefit big corpos from have a worse FOSS realm. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if there were several well-paid actors stirring $#!T up by rallying clueless gullible w()kes into attack vectors. (especially easy when a lot of them like to victimise themselves and don't miss a chance to lash out at something or someone for not giving them the attention they crave)
    1
  1271. Just call it Obelisk
    1
  1272. That would actually be best, since that means that China won't suddenly have 60% of the global chip manufacturing in their pockets. If TSMC disappears, then Samsung and Intel will boom in profitability as everybody will fight on getting chips produced. I guess whatever China has in house will also boom in production and profitability. But it will be a huge distruption too, as a lot of chips will simply not be made anymore, smartphones and many industries will suddenly have huge bottlenecks. Trump is crazy enough to welcome a situation like this.
    1
  1273. Enthusiastic idiot!
    1
  1274.  @MrSjengster  you can clearly realise that correcting someone, so it knows from now on how to write properly, it's not something negative. Please take your unconstructive negativity elsewhere.
    1
  1275.  @systemBuilder  Hey, it's true that the Intel chips were not efficient. But the heating part is totally Apple's fault. They had a colossal failure of a cooling system. Literally the worst in the market. I'm even questioning if they did it on purpose in order to justify the switch.
    1
  1276.  @felipematheus853  That's news to me, that the ARM GPU is absurdly efficient. Any sources on that ?
    1
  1277.  @felipematheus853  Pfffff, those comparisons are so off. 5600G is a desktop CPU. Second RX 580 is very old (in other words, meaningless in a comparison of today's state of anything) but also is ... a discreet GPU, which totally throws out of the window the efficiency comparison. Lastly it's ... not x86, lol. Still, if a chip can run CS:GO at 1 W that would be impressive. But I didn't find that. I did find that the M1 GPU runs at about 10 W, which is about as much as I expect. AMD's Z1 will also run at 10W on the lower end. Lunar Lake will be able to run the whole thing at 10W. Technically the others too, but LL should run a bit better when only fed 10W in total.
    1
  1278.  @temp50  Well, not everything will be available from the getgo. If I'm not mistaken there's still some peripherals that are basically unusable on Linux because they don't have drivers and nobody has time or resources to reverse engineer one. So initially it will be just rather basic stuff - CPU, GPU, mouse, keyboard, wired and wireless network, I guess bluetooth too. The rest... well, if what I wrote above will happen, the rest will come too, later, as the need for them will increase. But that's like more than 5 years into the future, I'm afraid.
    1
  1279. $500 milion is the investments put into it, but since everybody knows it's just a scam, you can bet that the actual money thrown to make this seem a legit try at doing it will be only a fraction. Say... $100 milion. You should be totally mad at it. Though I can't prove now, usually with these kind of scams, the source of the money, in the end, is tax-payers money. This is not funded from billionaire's own pockets. This is also a good way to see how much they trust it's own success.
    1
  1280. I think I'm drunk!
    1
  1281. I haven't seen any mention on this, so I have to ask... isn't the cost also a plus for copper ? When I was younger and learned about fiber optics (for networking), there were two main disadvantages: you must be really careful about bending the fiber cable, as it can't tolerate much. And it was MUCH more expensive. (or so they said) So... is fiber optics more expensive than copper for a cable ?
    1
  1282. Ah, a man of culture! Cheers!
    1
  1283. I think that Quake 2 with RTX looks pretty nice. While I can't say it's cartoony, I'd say it's neither that realistic.
    1
  1284. 13:40 :)
    1
  1285. splish, splash, splosh 🤣 good one!
    1
  1286. How about the Drig ? Simply from drag + Stig.
    1
  1287. Ok, found out that they DID recompute (finally) the severity.
    1
  1288.  @MrSGL21  I see what you did there ^^
    1
  1289. Excluding the 60x error, why is that delusional ? Having multiple assembly lines can allow for that. Even if it's one factory you can produce multiple in parallel. If you have 10 lines (which is a gross simplification, I know) you'd need to make a car every 18-19 minutes. They'd need more of course, but seems doable. Unless they'd need like 4000, which would make the factory be too gigantic.
    1
  1290.  @yakojjy  Oh, I wasn't speaking about Elon or Tesla in particular, I was asking theoretically, if 1 million cars / year is doable or not. Warren certainly is delusional. Elon surely isn't, he knows most of the time when things are impossible, just decides to straight up lie about it.
    1
  1291. Brodie, I agree that this being opt-out is bad. However some other things I disagree. Especially the points that the CTO discussed. I fully disagree with your take at 12:05 "This system does not do anything about stopping those economic incentives". And at 14:44 "The way you get this fixed is by talking with the regulators clamping on the advertisers [...] and THEN you can implement the system that gives them very minimal data." With the above, you are suggesting is that for an unspecified amount of time businesses to spend money for completely random ads, instead of targeted ones, basically to throw money in the air and light a flamethrower on it, and then in some mythical future they can get some data so they can be back on targeted advertising. And that somehow they won't be strongly incentivised to find and use ways around these regulations (that often get more and more terrible). Also you're saying that providing the service beforehand, so businesses can switch to it, in a specified window of time until the regulators can come raining down on them is somehow bad or useless. That somehow they'll have the same exact incentive to spend money to find or make ways around this. WTactualF. Please try having a business first, maybe it will be more apparent that what the CTO did and said on this approach makes the most sense. To put it more simply you're asking people that don't have a garage to park their car to first sell their cars, be carless for some time and then buy them back when the authorities built some parking lots. Nobody will do that. And it will be a massive backlash. Learn how things work in a society. Learn to think how is like for the other side. And they ARE doing something about the dystopian state of the web today. So far I haven't heard any other actual solution, something that is actually feaseable to be both useful, to work and also to be implemented. Another thing, at 10:16 "If you're unable to explain to the user in a short form why a system like this is benefical to them, why they would want a system like this running on their computer, you shouldn't be doing it". I agree that they should explain to the user. But I disagree on the "shouldn't be doing it" part. Many things are somewhat complicated and many people wouldn't understand because they're not that interested. Frankly many things are simply very subjective if they're explained or not. It can certainly be summarized quite shortly, but some would argue is not explained enough. And a more proper explanation would then be too long for some people. From "hard to explain" to "don't implement it" is a LOOONG road and the "hard to explain" shouldn't solely be the reason of not implementing something. People receive drugs and medication or even things like surgeries with very little explanation too. You can argue that maybe it shuoldn't be like that, but if you compare it to our case, this is orders of magnitude less damaging in any sense of the word, so in the grand scheme of things it can be explained very shortly and whomever truly wants to understand it can find that in the code or somehwere on the web in a blog post or a video or something.
    1
  1292. You mean boomers like Lunduke ?
    1
  1293. Not quite, since php 8 or 8.1. You can name the parameters when you call a function, so you can have them in any order. Also, frankly, any editor worth its salt should have a way to instantly tell you the parameters of a core function. Can't believe this is somehow still something to complain about to this day when it's at most 0.1% of the hassle you'd have working in PHP. Yeah, it's not great, but it's really not such a giant thing either. Annoying probably the first or second time you encounter it, then you easily get used to it and go past it. If you can't get used to something so benign, then you either have extreme OCD or should simply quit programming, as you'll have much worse problems down the line, no matter what language or framework you choose.
    1
  1294. Because this is how we evolve ? By having talks about how we think we should do things better ?
    1
  1295.  @ponypapa6785  Well, Dave said in the video that he doesn't see the appeal of vim and that, to his knowledge, even experts in vim are not faster/more productive than folks using an IDE. So Devin chimed in to say that he IS more productive in vim than in an IDE.
    1
  1296. Because it's DEFINITELY overused, and that's exactly what she said in the presentation.
    1
  1297. That should not be a COMMON (the C in CVE) use case. They should have a separate channel for that. Don't pollute the main channels for this extremely niche use case.
    1
  1298. @queerdo I think the idea is that the GNU parts and Linux kernel no longer provide an actual full functional system (well, I gues it does, but it's very barebones). And since a lot of extra stuff now exists and is arguably just as important, we should either list all of them, or just use a generic name.
    1
  1299.  @sdwone  Where have you seen that the kid didn't want to go ? I've seen the contrary, that he wanted to go, that's why his mother gave him her ticket. And I'm not defending him like he's a saint. I'm just stating that at least I respect that he put his money where his mouth was. He was willing to bet his life with his decisions. Many MANY other people don't do that. Case in point in video, Elon Musk. Also, stop portraying the rest as innocent civilians who were just peacefully going on with their lives, when the big bad evil engineer-CEO kidnapped them and put them on the submarine. They were aware of the risks. Like you said, there were warning and concerns already.
    1
  1300.  @Alan.livingston  Someone might let a monkey in the server room. Quick, create several articles disclosing the possibility and what to do when a monkey gets in the server room. The issue I take is that experimental is named like that for a reason. YOU THE CUSTOMER decided to use that, it's YOUR full responsability. Saying that they shipped the code is a non-issue here. You can compile nginx without http3, so even a rogue/malice configuration change won't affect you, it's not so easy as just flipping a flag.
    1
  1301. I hope you're prepared for when she'll grow a neckbeard.
    1
  1302.  @davebrowning9290  :))
    1
  1303. To the original message: it depends. A lot of scams are also explained to be (or sound) as simple as possible, just with huge lies, meant to attract people who don't want to get into the details and understand the product/service and realize it's something that's too good to be true.
    1
  1304. I don't use adblockers and never had. And I DO know about them. For me, it's simple: if it's in decent amounts, it's my way of paying for the service. If it's too much (there's some sites which are litered with them) then I simply quit that website, it just doesn't deserve anything. Not having an adblock allows me to see this difference better, while still helping normal websites pay their hosting bill. For YT I have premium for almost a decade, I think. Long before they've gone so insane with ads. Frankly, just knowing how hostile they are with ads, and also knowing other stupid sh!t they've done (like the dislike counter), I am waiting for a platform or way that can have the same reach and interactibility (I do read a lot of comments and write some replies, sometimes I can actually get to some nice micro-conversations) and I think I will jump ship. But it seems that will take some time.
    1
  1305.  @multicat2742  Okay, thanks for the info!
    1
  1306. Aaah, I see a person of culture!
    1
  1307. By my calculations, a 36 tonnes vehicle going 901 km (560 miles) at 60 kmph would need 1420 kWh or 5683 kg of batteries. In other words, I'm either very wrong or TF's napkin calculations are way off.
    1
  1308. Yikes!
    1
  1309. I'm a bit sad that Sabine didn't properly got Dave's message. It's not about censoring yourself. It's not about being a cheerleader for science. It's not about stopping to provide the criticism. It's about how you deliver this information. You can criticise all you want, but make it about what you know about. Always provide context, upfront. And have a bit less click bait in the title+thumbnail for BigBang's sake. "Foundations of physics" and "science" aren't interchangeable. Not even close. I'll still watch Sabine, and I am curious of everything she says about this subject. But this video gets a 100% dislike from me for widely missing the point. Hope she can course-correct (it's really not that difficult) but I thought and hoped that already when I watched Dave's video, so seeing this one makes me much less confident. In the end, I guess this is life, it can never be perfect. Compared to the dystopia forming outside, fortunately this is really minor stuff to be worried about.
    1
  1310. That's exactly what is said in the video
    1
  1311. DT mentioned in the video, but I guess it's not something very obvious: dependencies. You can upgrade a specific app and not have to worry that some library that it uses will also be upgraded and make another program not work anymore, because that program only works with the old version of the library. Also, I think it's easier to the program to only see its own stuff like that and not be able to touch the rest of the system.
    1
  1312. Maybe the pushback from the community will make them reconsider. That's what I hope.
    1
  1313.  @CalcProgrammer1  Don't want to sound negative, but working during lunch seems a bit crazy and, like, bad priorities and/or optimisation. Unless you are forced into having significant wait times where you have your lunch. Otherwise I don't get why you wouldn't focus in finishing eating ASAP so you can go back to the laptop. I do see this as a nice way to work during long commutes, say, in a subway, even when you don't get a seat. Certainly not doable on a laptop, but doable on a phone.
    1
  1314. Curious, do you have an NVidia GPU ?
    1
  1315. Sorry for necroposting but I just HAVE to mention that this was not a deep dive, but quite a shallow one. Not complaining or anything, just stating the fact.
    1
  1316.  @olavrb  What latency ?
    1
  1317. LoL, I made the same comment, only now I saw this one. Yeah, it's a programmer joke, I think I'd miss it too if I wasn't one.
    1
  1318. @Gamers Nexus If you happen to have some spare time... (clearly not now, maybe in december) would you do a review of Quake II non-RTX ? :D It would be nice (scientifically) to see how high FPS can it attain, if you can get it out of CPU bottleneck, total system latency on it and, of course, the true impact of going full path traced vs full rasterization, in raw power required. I suspect that the drop in FPS to be more than 95% going from rasterization to path-traced.
    1
  1319. That sounds dangerous
    1
  1320. @inodeska Unnecessary agressive reply. Not truly adult, you know...
    1
  1321. Can't spell trust without rust...
    1
  1322.  @BitsOfTruth  I think there's a saving grace here - FOSS projects are done basically exclusively online. With text. In places where you can have a pseudonim. In this context, having a custom pronoun is (to me, at least) the same as having a pseudonim. My name is not really Winnetou17, but people call me that if they want to talk with me. In a way, you can say they are forced to do so. But nobody forced them to talk (well, write) to me. Of course, there's a grey area that DT didn't talked about, what do you do when people take same troll names. If I call myself "God Allmight Himself" in the hopes that I'll see someone commenting in an issue "God Allmight Himself said that we should use the integer function" just for a cheap giggle... well, it's blasphemy for same people, and a known one. In these cases I'd say that the owner of such a name/title/pronoun should provide an id or proof that that's its actual name/title/pronoun and if not, to change its name/title/pronoun to one where such an action would not be neccesary.
    1
  1323.  @davidwuhrer6704  "Actually, avoiding Poettering's cruft is super easy, barely an inconvenience" if you work as a sysadmin or devops and the servers you work are RHEL 7 or newer .... can you avoid it then ? I think you can't, but I'm not 100% sure. What I wanted to point out is that for your computer you can absolutely not use it. But you might still be forced to work with it if it's used at work.
    1
  1324.  @terrydaktyllus1320  Was that confirmed or is just what Bryan concluded ? Because the latter is very likely but not guaranteed correct.
    1
  1325.  @kehlercreations  It's versus Intel IPC. It took the Zen2 IPC gains vs Intel and multiplied that to the extra IPC from Zen3 as compared to Zen2, so to obtain the IPC increase of Zen3 vs Intel's 10th gen.
    1
  1326. But this doesn't clone the Microsoft Windows solution. At all. WTF are you smoking ? This just popularizes the containerisation trend that was started with docker and the like on servers (mostly for web sites and development) and that got even more popular on cloud infrastructure. Ok, maybe it wasn't started by docker, vagrant was a thing before that, but it doesn't matter for this discussion.
    1
  1327.  @Maverick56912  Blasphemy!
    1
  1328. I was thinking the same. If you have a base load, consolidate that on dedicated servers, but still have a way to use serverless for extra load and spikes. That would combine the best of both worlds. I wonder who's already doing that out there (surely there is somebody).
    1
  1329.  @rmccombs66  On the usage part, it feels too arbitrary, I don't think you can enforce that. If you specify in the license what is that you disagree (eg "this cannot be used by people who use other pronouns other than "he/him" and "she/her"" instead of "this cannot be used by people who disagree with developer X") then ... that might be interpreted as discrimination and also not enforceable in western countries. And in both cases, in practice it will open up the developer to be massively boycotted for having such a strong opinion. So ... yeah. Oh, and also, this wouldn't be considered free software anymore, if there are usage restrictions.
    1
  1330. Stay strong!
    1
  1331. @Watcher Is that somethink akin to dwm, have a very small core, and simply add what you need extra on top ?
    1
  1332. ​ @BillySBC  Yet that's not a problem in Europe and China and Australia. And USA, for AI datacenters. Curious, very curious... Also, on your original comment - not having the infrastructure developed enough and not having it at all are VERY different things.
    1
  1333. Edit: bad take, kinda off-topic, see next replies. That's the thing, SVG only makes sense in certain contexts. If you have any photo or complex drawing in your website you either can't use SVG or it will be a massive downside using it. Overall, it doesn't make sense to have a website just with SVG, as a general statement, so that's why it's a cross.
    1
  1334.  @hopperelec  Hmm, actually, you're right, sorry about that, got things mixed up in my head. If that were the case I don't think we'd have fonts as vectors for decades now. Though fonts are probably a niche case where more optimisations can be had.
    1
  1335. So that's why my smartphone and my laptop only last for 4 hours. I need liquid air batteries for both, in order for them to last 24h or more. Got it!
    1
  1336.  @Gandalf721  a) that's what they say, that they don't focus on other phones, because they lack security features. And b) many others said that if I want it on my phone, I can take the source code and make it work. From the two above it's obviuos: the devs of Graphene OS decided to not support other devices, not even in a lesser way, say, just a minimal install that works, though there we're getting into the realm of if it's even worth the time. Also, in their FAQ they mention that "Broader device support can only happen after the community (companies, organizations and individuals) steps up to make substantial, ongoing contributions to making the existing device support sustainable." So it's not just "other cell phone companies" (a thing you should've known already, when you replied me). The only valid reason I see so far is that supporting more phones would be too difficult/impossible to do at the moment. But it should have been mentioned in the first place, not the "because it lacks security features". Also, stop assuming somebody is a perfect idiot just because it doesn't want to buy a specific line of phones.
    1
  1337. LoL
    1
  1338. If you would've watched the video, you would've seen the written little notes of metric equivalents
    1
  1339. I'm actually ok/not mad with intel's naming for Ice lake and Cascade Lake-X. Sure it's hard & annoying to pronounce and kinda long/overstays it's welcome. But, unlike many other naming schemes, this one is pretictable and it's not misleading. It's not good, but I can't get mad at it. It could've been much worse. Also do you guys know the monitor names ? If people aren't outraged by that, I don't why they would be outraged by this generation of Intel processors.
    1
  1340. @arizonasean7198 I remember seeing in a flat earth debunking video that IR radiation is why at night it's colder when you're in moonlight. It's not because the moon is something magical, but because earth cools better (via IR radiation) than under the trees (aka, when you're not in direct moonlight). That checks out with your tests. Would be cool to see alpine plants thrive next to a desert or something, yeah!
    1
  1341. By the silence of it, I think they'll launch it close to Alder Lake launch date, sooo... August or later
    1
  1342. Why ?
    1
  1343.  @DavesGarage  Oh, wow, didn't expect a reply from the man itself, thanks! I would like to say, suppose I'm a salty Rust developer, seeing Zig taking the first place. If I see the opposition winning by (what I think is) cheating, I'm not sure that going to cheat myself, to even the playing field, is the right answer. That's kind of the idea of what I said. Any chance for a video detailing the top winners ? How they got to those scores ? It would be very educational.
    1
  1344.  @no_the_other_ariksquad  From what I know, no, though I'm not 100% sure.
    1
  1345. "Just" ... as if it's that simple
    1
  1346. Don't want to play the devil's advocate, but have you checked inflation ? In the last years it has been much higher than the usual 2% per year. In purchasing power terms, the xx70's MSRP increased by only about 5%, as $500 from 2020 apparently is more than $570 now.
    1
  1347.  @Karti200  extra support for Intel ARC cards (and Meteor Lake) is coming in 6.7 ? Or was it 6.8 ? Can't remember correctly. And Mesa 24. But being on Linux Mint, uhm, these things might come later. I can't really tell, I'm not on Mint.
    1
  1348.  @Marlow925  Hmm, yeah, I can see how a modular bendable minibus could be made, so it fits that tunnel and could carry 6-20 people.
    1
  1349.  @Marlow925  Hmm, I read somewhere that this would to the almost one mile in 15 minutes. That would be 4 miles/h edit: no, it's one ride in 2 minutes which is more like 30 mph. Still, a charge could be enough for one day and in the timespan of a day, surely there will be a time to recharge without interfering, even with 62 cars. Didn't knew about the metal pollution and the need for ventilation, that's interesting. Anyway, thanks for actually providing arguments, it's refreshing :)
    1
  1350. Fast paced, competitive shooter Linus: let's play at under 60 FPS no matter what GPU we have Why ? Just why ??? Why the flying f*&%# play Halo at 4K ? You even have a video that says 4K is dumb, and this is the perfect example. If you don't have at least 120 FPS, preferably 300+, don't up the resolution. Just what does 4K give, besides score-ruining performance crippling ? This is not Anno 1800, high FPS is 10 times more important than high resolution.
    1
  1351.  @MaxwellAerialPhotography  But noone gets into those positions by doing nothing. You simply assume that because you don't know what he did, then he must've done nothing.
    1
  1352.  @MaxwellAerialPhotography  Fair point
    1
  1353.  @homfes  lol wut ?
    1
  1354.  @red_ben3487  There is an edit button on it ? Was it behind Brodie, on the right ? I haven't seen it.
    1
  1355. #AskGN: why change the naming scheme of this "generation" of Intel CPUs when it's a refresh of a refresh ? It's a mouthful, but it's known and predictable. It's naming function, that is, to be easy to recognize for what it is and it does, that part still does it's job. The only thing they could've evaded is that stupid 10900X (and maybe that whole "gen" they could've simply not do it). Other than that I'd say to change the naming scheme when something substantially changes. Why struggle to learn something new for a simple refresh ? That would be a greater sin, in my opition, to force the audience to adapt for such small change. It's more effort in this particular case to learn and adapt a new naming scheme that to struggle with this subpar one. Edit: to justify the #AskGN tag: when should naming schemes change ? What would constitute a good opportunity or need for a naming scheme change ? (also, just to add, the 10nm laptop CPUs names are stupid, I'm that not denying)
    1
  1356. Damn, no project escapes that nowadays. Though I have to say, that 6814 PR is a bit silly. And overblown (and it got a recent flood of comments too)
    1
  1357.  @wacesferpit  I love these "something something" tidbits. Thank you for the history/input.
    1
  1358. The % that is preallocated, well, I don't think that it matters in this discussion. Because, if you need 5% of 1000 GB, that's 50GB. If you have 2 partitions, say, 100GB for root and 900GB for the rest, well, then you'll have to sacrifice 5 + 45GB = the same 50GB for the filesystem's overhead. The thing that might matter, is that you also need to leave some free space available. If it's a percentage, that it doesn't matter. But if the partitions get small enough then the actual absolute value might matter. Like, you need, say, 10GB free in any HDD-based partitions, for doing defragmentation. If you have one partition, you can safely make sure you always have 10-15GB free. If you go to 3 partitions... well, now you'll need 30+GB free. Also, like other people noted, if using multiple partitions, the owner should know pretty well in advance how much space it needs for each of them, so it doesn't become a headache that one of them got full and you need more space there. Of course, it's also a blessing, maybe something went haywire and the some app is logging like crazy. If that folder is on it's own separate partition, it won't make you root partition full, bringing a lot more problems.
    1
  1359. @UndeadFleshgod I get the idea of what you're saying, but in this case it was totally fair. The bar graphs from Intel, at least what's shown in this video, all start at 0. The fact that the competition is normalized at 1 is totally normal.
    1
  1360.  @joeyvdm1  Oh wow, you really like this stuff :)) Well, maybe I heard/understood/remembered incorectly. From what I remember (I also watch AdornedTV and CoreTeks?CoreTecks?) there was something that because you only have one CCX, the cache is now available for every core directly, without the need for accessing the other CCX or duplicating the data in the local cache. The thing that might make our communication a bit harder here is that IPC is too broad of a term. Because it can be influeced by many things. Having a lower latency for... anything really, I see that as IPC increase. Don't know why companies wouldn't market it as such. Instead of saying "We got 5% lower latency, 5% better cache efficiency and 5% IPC", they will simply say "We got an average of 16% IPC increase". Because that's a bigger number, and very easy to understand: in average, everything will be 16% faster. It's nerds like us who want to know how is that 16% made of, to better asses which workloads will be impacted more. So, I still stand by my claim that IPC increase will encompass all the improvements, since that's the idea of IPC metric. Not "pure workload, no memory fetching or saving, no shared memory, no multicore communication" metric. And, even if I'm wrong, I want to not be too hyped up. Seeing in some places that Zen 3 will have "only 10-15%" IPC increase, as if that's not great, only makes me sad. Even with 10% IPC increase and absolutely nothing else improved, my quick mind maths tell me that this will be enough for Ryzen CPUs to match Intel in gaming (on average, on some games it will be better), while obliterating them in all other aspects. That's still something that I can't wait to see. Cheers!
    1
  1361.  @roblaquiere8220  The Boston Dynamics one might!
    1
  1362. I was thinking the same! I guess it's easier that way. Does rust have loop unfolding ? Since this program is so small, having 50k * 2 instructions would fit no problem. But then the delay would be too short. Oh well... Having literally only nop would give the same exact run time, right ? The current nop+for overhead, does that give also a completely fixed amount of time to run ? I guess since it doesn't have to access RAM, it should, right ?
    1
  1363. Out of curiosity, if you have the time, what are those features ? I remember that color space is one of them, which I think is improved/addressed with GIMP 3
    1
  1364.  @illdeletethismusic  What do you mean ? Or later what ?
    1
  1365.  @illdeletethismusic  I meant in practical terms, what does GPL3 to fix Android ? If I remember correctly Linus Torvalds specifically didn't like /agree with GPL3
    1
  1366.  @illdeletethismusic  Thanks for the refresher. I think it's hard to judge. Because, if Linux would get GPL3, it will not be funded and contributed upon anymore, as companies will try to find and/or build another GPL2 or less open thing. Like you said, Azure probably wouldn't exist. If the GPL3 would've been active 15 years ago, maybe even Android wouldn't exist. Or it wouldn't've been using the Linux kernel.
    1
  1367. In the Jan-Nov 2021 increase list, you skipped the real #14: Kia Niro EV.
    1
  1368. To Microsoft's defense, the control panel or the settings "app" (?? whatever that should be called now) surely is at least an order of magnitude more complicated than having icons in a file manager.
    1
  1369. While overall I agree with DT, I think this was a rather .... mediocre to poor argumentation. It's a blanket statement that's very lacking in nuances and completely neglects multiple things.
    1
  1370. Crazy cat dude yells at clouds!
    1
  1371. This was quite interesting. I feel like this can be great for single purpose computers when there's no "other applications". And if you think that you need things like apt, ls etcetc, those can simply be available by rebooting into a traditional kernel. I kind of want to build something like this with Gentoo. Have multiple installs for single purpose, like some game. And the init will simply launch the game, no bash, no login, no desktop env, not even a window manager. Updating the game and other things (like opening up a browser) would have to be done by rebooting. Might seem like overkill, but if you know you don't need the other stuff, and you need the performance ... ain't that neat ? Also, I'm thinking it might be a good way to setup the computer so the kids can play game A and B, but have it locked to do other stuff. However the dynamic downloading confused the hell out of me. What does that have to do with exokernels ? Can't that dynamic downloading happen very happily on traditional OS/kernels too ?
    1
  1372. Too bad it's a scam. They can't really go higher/bigger than what they've done already. The engineering just doesn't work. Very very sad that Real Engineering, of all people, felt into this very visible trap.
    1
  1373. #HeyDT! I have a question: I see that there's a lot of recommendations about what would be a beginner's Linux distro. But there's nothing more comprehensive for more intermediate to advanced users. I mean, after you go over that "first distro", after you learn and pass the basics and get confortable with Linux, including a bit of CLI, what should a person, assuming the learning curve is no more of a concern, what should a person look to for the "advanced" distro to "settle" in ? When ease of use is no longer a need, what would be a list of distro that someone should check further, possibly finding the BEST distro for them, and why those distro ? I feel like a more comprehensive guide on that is missing. I use Gentoo btw fyi!
    1
  1374. Thanks!
    1
  1375. I was asking myself the same thing! Whas was proven ? No detail at all in the video. And I'm surprised I had to scroll sooo much to find this content. Everybody else talks about something else. Not to mention a lot of "smart" people commenting that laws of physics cannot be broken.... aargh
    1
  1376.  @laughingvampire7555  ???? what are you smoking ?
    1
  1377. Say whaat ? The ticket to this was $2500 ?
    1
  1378. I can't wait for the book to describe the 10nm crysis. I really hope that in about 5 years an Intel employee will releasee this.
    1
  1379. That storing font information in the XCF for accurate selection, I think it makes more sense when the XCF is opened on a different computer which might have the fonts different, like have the same font but it might be in another path, or have a slightly different name or something like that. I don't know the details.
    1
  1380. Sooo, if it loses 1% the first year and "minimal degrade" (forgot the exact words) after .... I'm not THAT optimistic, so let's say it loses 1% of the current value each year. So after 25 years, it will be at 0.99^25 = 0.778 aka 77.8% of initial output. From a base of 25% efficiency, adding the degradation to 77.8% of that, we get to a net efficiency of 19.45%. The "normal" highend solar panel, if it has 22% efficiency, and the grade of deteoration is 8%, that means that in the end it will be at 22 * 0.92 = 20.24% efficiency. In other words, what the perovskite wins in the first years, the normal solar panel makes up in the later years. Ok, maybe not to the full extent, but to a good one. If we add that the perovskite is more expensive (though I don't know, maybe it won't) and/or requires more maintenance, then ... it feels kind of a moot point. I hope I'm proven wrong though. But it feels that it will be at least 5 years until the perovskites are out, proven, mature and at a good price. Those who can/want to buy solar panels now, shouldn't wait for perovskites.
    1
  1381.  @tdylan  I can slightly, kind of, give a pass to the politicians in this case. They didn't verify the claims by themselves, and we're not expecting to. They have to trust other people, like that president of West Virginia university. Speaking of, that president has absolutely no excuse. That's why you're an university, people have to believe you actually know what you're talking about. And that you don't compromise your integrity for cash grabs. Or at the very least not in so blatant ways.
    1
  1382. Sooooo, the issue was Arch & pacman itself, or the AUR ? I have this feeling that it is the latter, but I don't really know, haven't used any Arch-based system.
    1
  1383.  @Anonymous4045  So neither Arch nor pacman themselves, got it. Poor Arch, receiving hate for no fault of its own.
    1
  1384. To be frank, for today 5700X and 6750 XT are both last generation, so, no, it is not "modern" enough. Because I assume that question, the modern hardware, is about drivers. Which can lag behind hardware launches by several months. Which can turn to a year or even more on some distros. Your CPU and GPU are both 2 year old if I'm not mistaken, even Debian has support for them.
    1
  1385.  @ScoldAudits  True, you're absolutely correct!
    1
  1386. How is that different from having a pseudonim ? My real name is not Winnetou17, yet, in a way, I'm forcing you to call me like that. Isn't this the same thing ?
    1
  1387.  @Chris-oj7ro  Mozilla and Firefox isn't the same though. There are people who hate the stupid things (woke or not) that Mozilla do nowadays but still contribute to Firefox. Firefox absolutely is a competitor to Google, because it is still independent in what it does, in what features it does or doesn't include. Manifest v2 is a perfect example of that. The problem is that what little funding was handed to Firefox from Mozilla (don't remember which one, if it's the corp or the foundation) might be gone if the funding from Google stops. Because Mozilla was stolen by people who .... have other values. I so soooo wish they could be replaced back by people who are aligned with the values that Mozilla stood for 20 years ago, but it might be too late. Because those people surely won't willingly step down and I don't think there's a way left for them to be kicked out by the community.
    1
  1388. Isn't multithreading difficult in FORTH ?
    1
  1389. I'd say Gentoo. But it's really not for everyone.
    1
  1390.  @robinlee5415  Depends if they use AVX or not. For totally AVX-less loads, 9980X is faster. Otherwise it's about the same
    1
  1391. Drink a shot everytime you hear masonry. Then realize this isn't a video about Civ 7.
    1
  1392. In case it helps, I prefer wired over wireless. In general. Nothing to do with that keyboard. A wired peripheral I know it will always work, and have the least latency. And no issues with security, which bluetooth is (was?) full of. Additionally, never have to worry about a battery. Extra extra, even though it barely makes and difference, I'm happy that because there's no battery, it's friendlier to the environment. Current batteries are quite polluting to produce and they are guaranteed to have a quite limited lifetime. As I'm writing this, I'm still using a mouse which is close to 12 years old. Technically Li-Ion batteries can be used more than 12 years, but given how much I paid for the mouse and that I've only used it, and quite a lot (both work + personal), I'm sure that I would've need to have a battery change. Anyway, long story short, the wired part can be a plus for some people.
    1
  1393. You're 100% wrong. Twitter AT THE SCALE of Twitter is very complex! Everything at that scale is very complex.
    1
  1394. I'm on Gentoo. It's a distro that I can't fully recommend to somebody without knowing that person. In general you'd know best if Gentoo is for you or not. That being said, I'm on it for almost one year and a half (from Dec 2023-Jan 2024) and had no significant problems of any sort. No system instability at all. Gentoo is very good for learning and very good for control and customization. Because of the use flags, you can customize what an individual program/app/package has or doesn't, allowing you to enable experimental or esoteric features or remove things you don't want or don't need. It also allows you to have the binaries optimized for your specific CPU, which can help performance. If you happen to want to have patches for some programs, you can streamline that with Gentoo, so those programs are updated with the rest of the programs, while still having your patches applied. One thing I have to add ... the compilations are really exagerrated IMO. The laptop I'm using is almost 9 years old. It's from 2016. It has a 4 core Intel i7-6700HQ CPU. While it was high-end in 2016, now it's equivalent to a dual core CPU. It does help that I have 64 GB of RAM. Still, knowing that I don't have a fast system, the only program that's annoying to upgrade/compile is Chromium. Last compiles took about 14 hours, when not doing anything else (I just left it running while I went out). Everything else, no exceptions, takes up to 2 hours. Firefox is between 60 and 80 minutes. I'd say that, on average, I have about 1 (one) round of updates per week that takes more than 30 minutes (for everything that's new, not just a single program) and that's while I'm doing something else, like watching YT and commenting (which is pretty lightweight, true). I'm sure that if I had more Chromium based browsers, each would take that 14 hours to compile. It's true that I've also been lazy to dig deeper into ways I can speed it up. And I don't have KDE or GNOME, which I know are quite big, so those might add a bit of time compiling too. Still, if you have something low end or simply don't want to deal with the bigger compiles, there's binary packages. Not for all, but the browsers and bigger packages in general have a precompiled binary from Gentoo.
    1
  1395.  @ThePrimeagen  :) Yeah, I got that and it's awesome, we needed that for sooo long ago! I was just making fun of the "CEO of HTML" part.
    1
  1396. Honestly this looks to be the perfect "transition" distro for those who are too stubborn/scared to switch off from Windows. My aunt is like that. She literally said she doesn't want to learn anything new, just wants it to work and to do what she's used to do. She's not much into computers, so I can't say I don't understand her. Having a distro that mimics so well MS Windows is a good start. It would've been nice if it wouldn't have a license and if the clones would've been FOSS, but it's still better than nothing. Hopefully this paves the way into having those clones FOSS at one point.
    1
  1397. Yup. While it sounds neat, given that solar panels aren't cheap, easy to add (say, like a paiting job) and we need them everywhere, I'd argue that any solar panel would be more effective placed properly on a roof than on a car. It won't be shaded by an underground parking, or parking between tall buildings, it will be better angled towards the sun and so on.
    1
  1398. Does NomadBSD have a load2ram on boot option ?
    1
  1399.  @Steyr6500  Wasn't this launched in evening, US time ? Meaning middle of the night in Europe ? I think that contributes to not having a stream too.
    1
  1400. Holy moly, that's quite the difference!
    1
  1401. Depends. It also means a hierarchy. Like bigPart/smallPart. Which, sadly, still wouldn't be a good fit for GNU/Linux. But, I can't say it's wrong to call it like that either...
    1
  1402. The amount of cope is strong in this one. Apparently showcasing a stupid decision or a mistake is somehow hating and wishing the project to fail. This is the same kind of people that say that something they like (like Manjaro) is perfect, and when people are unavoidably disappointed, they say that you hate the project and don't understand its mission. It's why Linux is struggling to get more mainstream because people like this are so disconnected from reality (or refusing to accept it) and cannot tell you an accurate description of X or Y. Or communicate in a productive manner. Sigh
    1
  1403.  @Kadulikan  There are always people who would wreak havoc and there are always people who would never do such a thing. The rest of the 90+% of the people wouldn't normally do bad stuff, but they might given the motive and/or opportunity. In these cases, every deterrent helps. And back to our case, if it was me doing bad stuff, I wouldn't risk it doing it near the police, even if they don't have the duty to do something. You never know when it gets to be that one police officer who DOES intervene. What are you going to do then, sue him ?
    1
  1404. But do you have a neckbeard ? Also, most expensive hardware... are you running on Apple hardware ?
    1
  1405. From what I vaguely know, nowadays systemd is much less monolithic than it used to be. I don't care enough to check in detail. But I know it made efforts to have its executables less tightly coupled (aka dependent on other systemd executables). I wish someone would do a deep dive into that. @themadoneplays7842 and @reeinaldofernandez please stop embarrasing yourselves with "UNIX and its philosophy is 50 years old blabla storage needs". First of all 50 years old is not an argument. Having files and folders is 60 years old, should we stop using that, because the concept is so old ? You realize now how the age alone is not an argument (and dumb) ? Also, if you speak about storage needs ... it means you didn't understand the philosophy at all. The idea is to have multiple small (aka small scope, the storage needs don't matter) programs, so they can be used with other programs or inside other programs! Think of them like system libraries that you can also use directly. By being focused (aka, small) they can be used with or inside other programs with the least overhead. Here's an example of a gigantic program that DOES follow the UNIX philosophy: ffmpeg.
    1
  1406. Ha, didn't knew about it. But I just have to say, I just went to their website, and the latest blog post is from 2021...
    1
  1407. Gravity is pretty nice to watch in actual 3D
    1
  1408.  @tmc6799  Hail damage shouldn't be much different than solar panels installed on roofs. Howerever most of your other points I agree to. A solar panel installed on a roof would serve the migration to fully electric more than the same solar panel installed on a car.
    1
  1409.  @raughboy188  This "I don't care until it's relevant for me" is a pretty bad take. Thing is, one thing leads to another, and by the time it gets to be relevant to you, it might be too late to correct/repair/deal with it. To give a very simpified example, somebody warns you that there's termites in the area and you should be wary. But you don't do anything until it's clear that the termites are actually causing problems. So one year later you see termites existing from one of your wall so you decide to act then. You inspect and see that they indeed crunched at the wall and you promply kill of all them. But the wall is already compromised beyond repair, it will crumble any day now and you have to replace it and you might not have the time and/or resources to do it. It's the same thing here - by the time something directly affects you, the big contributors to GNOME might've been outed already. Other contributors soured and so on. Even if you ditch the Microsoft guy and abolish the CoC comitee, the damage has been done, and it's really difficult to recover, as there's no guarantee that the former contributors will or can return, and finding new ones takes a lot of time. And recovering trust in general (though there can be exceptions, if you have trust-worthy people in lead)
    1
  1410. He said in another comment chain that he would like a new Framework laptop, but he didn't killed this one yet :))
    1
  1411. It's just Java that the problem there. And I say that as someone who hates Java.
    1
  1412. Mouse click, dt, mouse click. Not double click. You'd need to hear the click sound twice for that.
    1
  1413.  @adrianmizen5070  Well, I do agree with his point. But it's still extremely annoying to go along. It's akin with somebody being correct, but saying a curse or a swearword every now and then. Yeah, they're correct, but it's still something you'd wish they stopped doing.
    1
  1414.  @Crackalacking_Z  Oh, ok.
    1
  1415. Mac is a BSD offshoot, which itself is a fork/base from UNIX. All are UNIX-like (and Mac, until recently was actually UNIX certified). That's why the commands are the same. MacOS is NOT based on Linux. At all!
    1
  1416. Windows itself might not ever get open source, but there's the very low chance that ReactOS takes off and actually provides a drop-in replacement, at least for Windows 95 to Windows 7. And given how much Microsoft has fumbled with idiotic searches, imposed telemetry, and other nonsense, they wouldn't even be that behind Windows 11 or whatever the next version after 11 will be named.
    1
  1417. I think he wanted to say 25k lines in a single file. I've seen that several times. Not recently though, but recently I did have the "pleasure" of 5k lines of code files.
    1
  1418. It might actually get to stable 60 FPS :))
    1
  1419.  @motoryzen  9% of what ? That is, in what market ?
    1
  1420. You can use the CLI commands in scripting. So the need for them is real. The find command in particular, except for the most basic of cases, I doubt you can make a gui in which it would be easier to initeract with. You'll have to type just as much, but also have to use the mouse and jump from section to section. And it would look terrible. If you don't want to see the CLI, just use a distro like Linux Mint, I don't get the problem. It and a few others actually have that goal in mind, that no user should be forced to use the terminal. Quite whining about things that don't affect you.
    1
  1421. To add up to what those above said, if I'm not mistaken, the efficiency of the second thread per core matters a lot on how the software is implemented and if the application happens to wait on stuff. If a program is poorly optimized or it frequently has to wait for disk or whatever, that 1 core 2 thread can actually get to 200%, same as 2 core 2 thread.
    1
  1422. The actual contract of buying would've been much different than the stage presentation. It always does. Legally they're pretty well covered.
    1
  1423. I actually hate Java, but WTF does that "JavaScript has Java in its name" has to do with anything ? It's not their (java devs) fault for that.
    1
  1424. Well, Threadripper and server chips do have 4 to at least 12 channels. Which is what this APU uses, 256 bit bus, meaning 4 channels. They certainly could've made it if they wanted, and at most if would've been slightly slower (lower frequency), but still quad channel, which is what matters. Won't deny it would've been expensive and that it would've took a lot of time.
    1
  1425. People have this happened to them multiple times, on the same car ? That's quite some 1% there!
    1
  1426.  @Draco-jk3rb  Says random troll on the internet, against a proven scientist
    1
  1427.  @terrydaktyllus1320  I don't want to seem offensive, but I can't contain myself and have to tell you that, maan, your comment is basically useless.
    1
  1428.  @fluchtigziege3202  "batteries are kinda at their optimum, we know them for thousands of years, we know pretty much all there is to know blabla" (summed-up quote) Clearly the dumbest post of this thread. Maybe even the comment section, but I haven't read all comments. It's not like there's massive-scale research in the battery technology, which did continously improved in the last 2 centuries and continues to do so (easiest example would be the last Tesla battery day). It's not like solid-state batteries are a thing (while you state the vinegar batteries in ancient times as if they were proven). It's ok to not be excited, but to say that we pretty much know all there is to know... sheesh
    1
  1429. Search here on YouTube "TempleOS Down the Rabbit Hole" I think that's the first full length documentary on TempleOS and Terry Davis and it's almost one and a half hour long.
    1
  1430. Easy, two checks, at least one has to be true: - a) have you programmed something non-trivial that can be shown to someone else ? (Like having a project on GitHub, or an executable, or a pull request on GitHub. For the project/executable preferably something that has been used by someone else, or by you in some task that can also be shown. And for the pull request(s) preferably at least one that was accepted) or - b) have you been paid for programming something ? If the answer is yes to either of these questions, then you can say you're a programmer. If not, then I guess it's up to you, but the opinion of other people might differ :)
    1
  1431. 3:15 "Mercurial is great, Git is great. [...] Not merged together" - what if we rebase Mercurial on top of Git ?
    1
  1432. Hey DT! Isn't ChromeOS kind of like having videos on YouTube ? I mean, ChromeOS by itself you can say it's AIDS, but, compared to the cancer that is Windows, you are in Linux ecosystem, so you can get used to it, so LATER you can have an easy transition to a FOSS Linux distro. There's also ChromiumOS ? Also, reviewing I wouldn't say is the same as promoting. You could review it, and compare it to, say, Arch, and note it's shortcomings. Or simply state that it's doing its job ok (theoretically, I have no idea how it runs) but is proprietary and that's bad because X, Y and Z. Someone totally out of FOSS mindset might want to check ChromeOS, if it's ok to be used instead of Windows, land on your video and have more insight overall. Checking the competition from time to time and seeing the exact differences is healty in an honest debate, where you know exactly what Linux does better, and you can also see what Windows does better and can learn and comment that maybe Linux should do aswell. Also, also, regarding GNU/Hurd, you can still review it, to see and show where it stands in terms of support and features. And of course, mention that it's not ready for bare-metal install and daily usage. People have done the same with HaikuOS and ReactOS and nobody complained that it ruined their computer or something. Wait, haven't you reviewed ReactOS at some point ? Why the change of heart ?
    1
  1433.  @lazyh0rse  You didn't understand my point. Yeah, you're telling me to just use Ubuntu, but I'm not the target, since I already know better. But a dad who works in marketing might not have a clue when he searches for a laptop for his son and sees that there's laptops with Windows and laptops with Chrome OS. He knows about Windows, but doesn't about Chrome OS, so he does a quick check online or on YT about ChromeOS. Where will he hear "just use Ubuntu" if DT or other FOSS people don't make a video about ChromeOS ? That was my point.
    1
  1434.  @LokiScarletWasHere  No, we need to push back against irelevant ammo being effective. We shouldn't cave in to malitious, baseless threats.
    1
  1435.  @LokiScarletWasHere  But it wouldn't be exactly defending him, it would be enforcing that his opinions (some for which he also apologized for) on those matters are IRRELEVANT in the context of FSF and as such, off-topic and unable to influence anything. Once this is out of the way, there's no more reasons to attack RMS inside FSF of the GNU project.
    1
  1436. I'm surprised too!
    1
  1437. Oh, almost forgot. What does sudo provide over su using -c option ? It's still a one-time command, so the point about staying logged in as root is completely deflected. And not to mention that you don't need to bother with the wheel group and all that configuration. There's even less ways for hackers to do stuff (since you can't "su" from a bash script file, but you can sudo, if it has the permissions, say, if it's owned by your user). If you have sudo access, I don't know if disabling the root account helps that much (security-wise). You can still keep the nologin shell to keep ssh logins at bay. What am I missing ?
    1
  1438.  @notuxnobux  Okay, fair enough.
    1
  1439. It's rather new.
    1
  1440. I have to say, every now and then I lose more respect about the USA. Take this case: given how there were some absolutely insane cases, people going to court over really stupid things and the people having in general a "court-happy" attitude, seeing now that the big corporations have more and more pass on absolutely evil, obviously wrong, criminal stuff and people doing nothing about it... that's just sad, man. A person can sue some company because it said that the noodles are done in 3 minutes, but it's actually not done in 3 minutes, it's 3 minutes to stay in the microwave oven, you still need about 1 minute to unwrap them and put them in a bowl and such. So, someone can do this, but when there's actually a really big problem, with big consequences, people having DAYS of their very expensive tools offline because they have to wait for the manufacturer to come over with their laptop and fix the problem in 10 minutes, of course with no compensation of any kind for the days when the tractor or whatever was offline. And when they clearly violated a license... like what more do you need ? What a clown world... sigh
    1
  1441. Technically you can lower or limit the CPU clocks on the CM5 to match the power draw of CM4. And I assume it will still be faster (and thus, more efficient) than CM4, though I wish somebody put some numbers to this assumption.
    1
  1442. 6:01 "It's impossible to leave yourself in an unbootable state" - my @s$! Have a "lucky" grub update and then tell me how well that quote aged. I kinda get the reproductibility, but I don't see what it's SUCH a big thing. It's ... nice. Surely not everybody needs it. It does sound good for a dev environment though, I agree. The "every program has its own libraries" aka kind of (or actually, I don't know) statically linked is ... not that good ? I mean, it's very nice to have the ability, when you need two or more libraries at different versions for different programs. But... it's good to also have it like only once if you only need it once, instead of potentially 100 times. And, yeah, in some instances I do prefer it instead of virtualization (like when it's not about security but about making sure it has all the dependencies properly set, with the correct versions). But I don't want this to be the default for all my programs. Feels like waste. That graph with the number of packages and fresh packages ... it smells funny to me (to put it mildly). Any source on that ? I find it hard to believe that nix has so much over all the rest, it's either through a gimmick (like counting each version of a package as individual packages) or some other kind of BS. At least that's what I think. EDIT: ok, I checked a bit, apparently it's just super easy to contribute to it, which at least partially, is a good reason to have high number of packages. So I guess it's legit high number. Neat! So... yeah, I'll stick with Gentoo. It's still the most powerful and configurable/customizable of the bunch. Also cutting edge and stable, mind you. And you can choose if you want a more stable version of an app or a more bleeding edge version. And theoretically you can set automatic updates but it wouldn't be a good idea, sometimes un update needs a bit of manual care, like a configuration change. Gentoo tells you nicely about this, but you won't be able to see it if it's running in the background. But starting the update and seeing if there's extra things to check/do barely takes a minute anyway, after which you can leave it compiling in the background, so I don't see the appeal anyway.
    1
  1443.  @angeldude101  Oh, if it's still shared if it's same version or identical binary, then it's great! Thanks for the info!
    1
  1444. For the async/await, couldn't that be done with Swoole ? It's an official server which can do sync, async, fiber and I think everything inbetween. Haven't used it, but it looks interesting, I can't wait to try it out.
    1
  1445.  @FinlayDaG33k  Oh, ok.
    1
  1446. What the hell, did noone observed that the barcode import/read/whatever it is, was WAY off ? Actual food label: serving size 1 can of 106g serving energy: 230 kCal. About 217 kCal per 100 g of which: total fat: 15g (roughly 9 kCal per g of fat, so 15 * 9 = 135 kCal) of which saturated is 3g Carbohydrate: 6g (roughly 4 kCal per g of carbohydrate, so 6 * 4 = 24 kCal) Protein: 18g (roughtly 4 kCal per g of carbohydrate, so 18 * 4 = 72 kCal) Summing these, we get 135 + 24 + 72 = 231 kCal, which is very close to the shown 230 kCal per serving Extra stuff: 110 mg cholesterol; 330 mg sodium, 30 mg calcium, 10.8 mg iron and 60 mg potassium The app: Says there's two portions/servings, ok 110 kCal - where is this number from ? It's neither the serving energy, neither the per 100g energy. 6g of fat - uhm... totally wrong ? Saturated Fat - 1.5g - uhm, half of per serving ? Carbohydrates: 2g - off Protein: 11g - ??? I assume that since it says there's 2 portions, it simply lists half of what the entire serving (can) is. But those numbers are still off! 7.5g of fat, not 6g 1.5g of saturated fat, this one is correct 3g of carbohydrates, not 2g 9g of protein, not 11g Also, if we sum up the energy from the app's numbers, we get 7.5 * 9 (fat) + 2 * 4 (carbos) + 11 * 4 (protein) = 119.5, aka 120 kCal, not 110 Ok, the numbers are not THAT far off, but still quite far in order to have trust in them.
    1
  1447. Yeah, for simple websites, it's still perfectly ok, no need to complicate things so much. $0 tooling
    1
  1448. On the "I like autocomplete" part. I think it's not done/enabled because it will cost you much more. That is, there would be places/times when you wouldn't want it to spend time, money and resources to autocomplete. So I guess that's why it's prompt only, at least for now.
    1
  1449.  @LifeIsCrazyAsShit  I had this exact problem in a big table in MySQL several years ago. For example, doing SELECT whatever FROM table_name WHERE id > 433453 LIMIT 100 OFFSET 1000000; This killed the performance, because the id column was a clustered index (PRIMARY KEY). It knew to jump to that id immediately, but couldn't compute the offset and also do that jump directly, it had to go through all that one million rows/ids. So the higher the offset, the slower it ran (and that table had between 25 and 35 million rows). The job was to export basically the whole table, but in order, from where it left off. And we had small batches of exports. Once I changed the job to remember the last id, I changed the query to simply be SELECT whatever FROM table_name WHERE id > 124342343 LIMIT 100; And voila! the speed was back. No matter the id, if I was at the beggining, middle or end of the table, the query was fast, in constant time basically. So the lesson is - watch out when using OFFSET. Some indexes allow "jumping", but some don't, and in these cases, high offset values are a performance killer.
    1
  1450.  @shallex5744  Yup, it does. And also, when programming, it's simpler to write if (task_or_function) {handle_error_case();} // and no else or not needed, since if it was successful, you simply continue to the next part While at first a bit unintuitive, it's a convetion that makes perfect sense when you think about it a bit.
    1
  1451. @TheFridayCheckout please fix the chapters. Thank you!
    1
  1452.  @panathatube  Microsoft also has a trackrecord of not properly supporting their hardware, while Hauwei showed extreme resillience. From these alone, I'd give more chances to Harmony OS
    1
  1453.  @panathatube  Where does that "abandon" come from ? They would simply also make their app for HarmonyOS too, alongside iOS and Android. Because they want to have access to the customers who have Huawei. If you're speaking about customers (not app developers) then some are already using Huawei. Even the versions where installing Play Store apps is quite difficult (and some, like banking apps, I think don't even work at all). Though I don't know how much % of the market share they are.
    1
  1454.  @deebil8099  "the AI computing facilities they want to build and that can eat up the electricity of a small city" - that for a single mediocre data center. Combined I think they're already at the scale of a medium sized country, and they want more!
    1
  1455. Not to be pedantic, but the Section 24220 says nothing about the abilities there to be remote. Everything can simply run local. Okay, who am I kidding ? Of course I'm pedantic.
    1
  1456. My several cents, that I haven't seen on other commenters: - asks for unsigned ints but reads them as %hi instead of %hu . But this is a very minor thing, I agree - I don't know for the life of me the requirement to enter the types in order. You can handle all cases TRIVIALLY by simply having something like switch(ptr->type) { case 124: // nobreak or whatever signal you have for your compiler to not see this as a mistake case 142: // nobreak or whatever signal you have for your compiler to not see this as a mistake case 214: // nobreak or whatever signal you have for your compiler to not see this as a mistake case 241: // nobreak or whatever signal you have for your compiler to not see this as a mistake case 412: // nobreak or whatever signal you have for your compiler to not see this as a mistake case 421: arrayCreation(0, 52, 62, 92, ptr); break; } - the example above was the most complex. When there's only two "types" chosen, there's only two cases (12 and 21 or 24 and 42 etc). - while writing the above, I just observed that the "124" case is missing. tsk tsk tsk, -1 point! - I think the main idea for most tips presented here is missing: the whole code I'd say is quite ok and readable and maintainable. Because it's small. When you get into a project with hundred of source files and thousands of lines of code and hundreds to thousands of functions, THEN having comments is important. When you have those "magic" numbers spread in 20 files, THEN you'll be doomed if you have to update them, so using a define for it is better, so it can be trivially updated - especially since it's a small program, I don't like the idea with the enum and the extra parsing, at least not being given as a blanket statement. That's basically overengineering. Feature creep. You're creating extra code, including RUNTIME code (which is why I dislike it) for a POTENTIAL FUTURE. You're making the code more complex and which runs slower just because "it feels right". There should be disclaimers. Like, do you know with decent certainty that this will not be updated (like getting that 5th type) ? If yes, then the current code is perfect. If you know it will be updated, or if you're not sure, THEN, maybe, think of a more extendible solution. Still, it's it's something small, it might still be ok to make it like that and only refactor it when it's needed. Don't fear refactorings, since you cannot avoid them. Instead embrace them and get used to them.
    1
  1457. Regarding the GPU (or anything else) bottleneck... it usually isn't so simple. Let's say that for a particular game, to draw a frame, it needs x CPU work and y GPU work. But, the GPU work can only start after, say, 20% of CPU work is done. So, the frame length then would be computed like 0.2 * x + max (0.8 * x, y). This, is, of course oversimplified. But even so, it can be seen that if the CPU work is done very quick (let's say x is 2ms) compared to the GPU work (let's say y is 20ms), then this will appear as a GPU bottleneck. Because it will take 20.4 ms to finish the frame. And, if you double the CPU speed, it will take.... 20.2 ms to finish the frame. That's why, even though in some scenarios the GPU bottleneck is clearly seen, there's still a smaaall difference between the CPUs. I think we can say that in the scenarios where doubling the [whatever] performance, the net gain is less that 1% of total performance, then we have a hard [whatever-else] bottleneck. If the increase is still too small, but actually visible, like 10%, then we can say there's a soft cap.
    1
  1458. Ooooh, snap!
    1
  1459. I guess, but that wouldn't detect "who" is in the room.
    1
  1460. But isn't decompressing/compressing software (like 7z) both multithreaded and heavily optimised ? I remember that it's usually used as a CPU benchmark, and having faster or more cores always helps. And the difference is quite visible (almost linear in some cases)
    1
  1461.  @neeljavia2965  Except that any normal person will be just as unimpressed. Unemployed nobodies like you make Must richer when it shouldn't. He created and hyped this so he can get nice contracts for his Boring company. Which he totally did, because, yeah, he is very smart. But it's still overhyping something which isn't new nor revolutionary and actually downright worse than the tech we already have: subway trains! Cars work only in pretty small scale like this ALMOST AN ENTIRE MILE of a track when you don't have many people to transport and when they're happy to pay the extra (don't kid yourself, unless there's very very few people travelling, a subway train is more cost effective too). People getting excited that "this is the future" are, sorry to say, stupid.
    1
  1462. I think that what they wanted to avoid (but put 0 effort into explaining it) that's actually understandable, is using the CT to be used as a home battery a lot, and still try to have the 8 years of warranty, because you're driving 0 miles, but degrade the battery as if you drove 1,000,000 miles in those 8 years, then ask for a replacement after 7.5 years. 1,000,000 miles sounds too much ? Let's do some math if it's possible. Let's assume that the battery has 100 kWh energy capacity. It's good to not use 0% to 100%, so let's say the usable capacity is 60 kWh. 11,5 kW, means that if full, it will discharge in, say, 6 hours, rounding up a bit. If recharging from 20% back to 60% again, it would mean it needs 10 hours just for the discharge part to cover 100% of the battery capacity. That means it's totally doable to have a full charge-discharge cycle in a day. Also, that would be like driving about 300 miles What does 7 years mean in terms of days ? 7 * 365.25 = 2556.75 days. Let's round that to 2500 So, 2500 days means potentially 2500 battery cycles. I read somewhere that they officially said that their batteries can be used for 1500 cycles. So that's already over the limit. Also, 300 miles * 2500 = 750,000 miles. Ok, so I was off, but it's still 5 times over what they would've covered, if you used it to drive, not to power a home or whatever. And it is over its expected life time. To put it in another way, 150,000 miles would mean it only needs 150,000/300 = 500 cycles, about 1/3 of the battery lifespan. Still doesn't excuse what they wrote. Or Elon being a gigantic jerk that needs to be jailed, along with the many people that enabled him to go this far.
    1
  1463. Just realized that they're incompetent not only from failing to word up to cover the potential case I explained above, without also including totally BS opportunities to not cover the warranty, but they're also so incompetent that they failed (I think, I didn't read that whole thing, only what Louis showed us) to also exclude another edge case that's not their manufacturing fault (though you can say it's their marketing fault for making the claims, so ... I'm not sad if they get punished). So, here's the thing. The CT can tow about 5000 kg (11,000 of caveman-age freedom units). And from several reviews I've seen, when doing that, the range is only about 100 miles (yeah, I should use km, not miles, but I'm lazy to do the computation when all the given details are already in miles). That means that you can have one full battery cycle for only 100 miles. How many cycles would then 150,000 miles mean ? Exactly 1500, which is the expected life span of the battery, so it's basically guaranteed that it won't still be over 70% of its initial capacity. So they' have to cover its replacement. Though to be frank, they also say that they won't give you / restore you to a brand new battery, just one that is in spec (aka working and above 70% capacity) so they probably aren't losing much on a repair like this. Still, you could theoretically do this multiple times. In reality they'll surely deny service.
    1
  1464.  @azureforks.  I'm not sure what are you referring exactly.
    1
  1465.  @azureforks.  Oh, fair enough. I guess I got carried away a bit :D
    1
  1466. A bit lazy to research, but isn't Cyberpunk 2077 missing just from PS4 (not PS5) store ? Because just on PS4 it had abysmal performance ? Edit: searched for it after all. It was removed from PS5 too, but it will be back on June 21st (just on PS5 if I understood correctly).
    1
  1467.  @InternetDarkLord  He didn't and he said so. He criticised what Sabine puts in her videos, not her book.
    1
  1468. @Gamers Nexus Could you include Battlefield 5 in your gaming benchmarks ? It appears to be quite demanding, and very unforgiving of 4 cores (even 4C8T CPUs)
    1
  1469.  @user-qi9be4lv7l  Well, technically Ryzen 3 series IPC is already better than Intel's 9th gen IPC. If you get a 3700X or 3800X to 5 GHz it will smoke 9900K or 9900KS at 5GHz in every benchmark. But, as it stands now, 9900K and 9900KS still have a significant advantage in clock speeds, so even if their IPC is slightly inferior, overall they get ahead, especially in gaming.
    1
  1470. more details ?
    1
  1471.  @xrafter  The button doesn't show if you're not logged in. And it might not show if you're not on YT Premium.
    1
  1472.  @xrafter  Oh, yeah, of course you're logged in, sorry, brain fart on my part :)) I guess it's region locking then.
    1
  1473. Why isn't there a single mention of RX6500 ? I know it's with problems, and it's most likely not very relevant anyway, quite a different class and pricing (I think, haven't checked). But at least a mention why it's not included would've been nice. You know, if it's not literally the bottom of the barrel, show what's below too, even if it's 40% lower.
    1
  1474. Why wouldn't he ?
    1
  1475. I'm the same, though I'm still very new to Wine. I had multiple times problems with both Lutris and even Steam when I did something wrong and launching some installer or game would endlessly create explorer.exe processes and if I wasn't fast on it, it will totally cripple my system when the RAM is out. I was so happy when I managed to make a fullscreen game (For the Glory) which cannot work windowed (it requires 16bit color) work in a virtual desktop so it thought it was fullscreen, but actually it wasn't. That way I also got back the ability to "Alt-tab" to the browser in the 2nd monitor to change the YouTube video. Without the virtual desktop, after switching out from the game and swithing back on to it, the game would perpetually be a black screen. Winetricks and protontricks are nice. I'll try to slowly learn the inns and outs of wine so I can rely less and less on extra frontends and helpers and such. I usually don't like extra programs to help me. It's nice for those that don't want to bother with the details, but usually in the long run, learning the core program is just better, you get to know exactly what and how it can be done. The helper programs usually are more limited and sometimes introduce extra bugs or sometimes even make things harder.
    1
  1476.  @crocodile2006  70% in 30 minutes my ass. At Semi chargers that don't exist. Get outta here!
    1
  1477.  @crocodile2006  LoL, you're the one coping. I have no problem seeing Thunderf00t making mistakes and he does so from time to time. He's still basically spotless in comparison to Elon Musk though. If USA wasn't a slave-rider-owned 3rd world grade of a country, Elon would've been in jail since long ago. "Beats rail", yeah, no, not even close. "Full self driving" - any normal country would have made that name illegal. Back to the topic. How did Thunderf00t lie, when he gave an estimation ? Why are you not at all concerned that Elon/Tesla were happy to give A LOT of bullshit totally meaningless details, but didn't said the max cargo ? How can you not see that that's the typical sign of a con man (as if he didn't showed plenty of signs already) ? Oh, sorry, you were speaking about the charging time, not the cargo limit. Here's the thing. In the Semi Event they only said that this new v4 supercharger is capable of delivering 1MW and that is uses liquid cooling in the cable so it doesn't require a massive-width cable. There's no mention of 70% in 30 minutes, or anything about the speed of recharding so there's no explanation either. Even so, in practice, I'm not even sure in how many years will those 1 MW stations will get to be plenty enough so you don't have to wait for your turn. 1 MW is no joke, you can't just simply make that everywhere. And it won't be able to simply service 20 trucks at once.
    1
  1478. Just visit her website that's mentioned at 56:44
    1
  1479. 1. How is that different than simply having a pseudonim online ? Do you feel bad in any way that you have to call me Winnetou17, which, let me tell you, is not my real name ? Do you feel like you have to lie about other parts of our conversation because of this ? 2. Stop communicating, as part of the project, on instant messaging, which is more emotion prone. You can still have discussions in github issues and on mailing lists. Where people usually put more thought and effort and aren't simply going to make a bad joke, or other quickly go into a flame war because somebody typed a bit faster than was able to think. It's a bit strict, but I see the value, it should work. 3. How can not joining as a contributor stop you in any way of being interested ? I am a contributor of exactly 0 (zero) FOSS projects, even though I am a developer, and I'm still very much interested in a good bunch of FOSS projects. When I'll retire, I think I'll even start contributing. Are you actually trying to be trolling or do you actually think like what DT said is to stop being interested ? 4. Here DT could've given more examples. The idea is to separate and to have a project about a single thing. Like, a browser is about being a browser, you enter an address, it fetches the data from that addreess and renders it. It should not save the planet, care about the poor kids in Africa and so on. Those should be different projects. This allows the project that is about software to stay apolitical and in general focused and not dwelve into endless talks about inclusivity and other flame wars like that (though a flame war about micro vs monolithic kernel is totally ok)
    1
  1480.  @bakters  Yeah, you're right on the pseudonym vs identity, but I'd say that matters when you are in person. On the internet, on github issues, maybe even on Discord ... does it matter ? As in, is there a context where the difference between just using a name and believing it to be true, is there a context where these are different ? It's true that DT didn't mention that this is only for in-text-over-the-internet collaboration. Given the nature of FOSS projects nowadays, that can be implied, or most would think as such, but it would've been good to be mentioned, to set the stage, so to speak.
    1
  1481. Unless it fits your needs very well, it's basically a donation. Don't buy it, unless a) you know that you'll be able to actually use it (without frustration) or to b) give it to someone who will appreciate it, or c) be ok with the money spent working like a donation, that is, not receinving something in return, other than the warm feeling that you did the right thing and pushed the world in a better direction.
    1
  1482. Can't wait for Linus to watercool it :D
    1
  1483. This really makes you think. If things really get proper multithreading, imagine that for a high-end PC you could have an equivalent of 10 rPis, consuming 10-20 W, instead of big CPU. And if you could have like 1 rPi for the OS alone, 2 rPis for browsing and the rest for whatever game or workload. Of course this idea is kind of impossible now, as having multiple CPUs on a single motherboard is totally not a thing, except 2 CPUs for specific server-grade boards.
    1
  1484. Soooo, the selected B450 boards that can have a BIOS update... will they stop providing Zen2 support, while B550 will happily do so ? Am I missing something ? Other than that, this is great news!
    1
  1485.  @quantumblurrr  Most probably they will.
    1
  1486. Old McDonald had a farm AI AI Iyo
    1
  1487. 22:04 Now I REALLY want to see a video of how/what you did to reduce power consumption of the studio by 16.8 KWh (if I heard that correctly). It might be quite educational for most of us.
    1
  1488. The really nice feature of FOSS and Linux is giving you the choice. The option. The idea that it's your hardware, your system, you do whatever you wish to it, nobody can tell you what you should do. To answer your question, DT, I'd say that having a checkbox somewhere at the top, saying "Include proprietary software" and with a tooltip explaining what it is, and maybe list the main licences that are or aren't free. That would enable everybody to have all the power, while also making it visible and easy to stay FOSS (also easy for someone who has no idea what it is, to learn about it) Though it might be a bit too much work, to list on all software the license it uses would be neat too. Though then it might be a slippery slope of useful information that can be added. Like the version, the release date and so on, it might clutter the visuals a bit. Designs are hard!
    1
  1489. SSDs existed for decades, but were mostly only used in military equipment. And 8GB is very little, even by 2008 standards.
    1
  1490.  @AlfieLikesComputers  Oh, right.
    1
  1491. WTF does it matter that the original GNU tools were upgraded ? Linux was upgraded too, you think Linus made every commit ? How can you spew such stupid bullshit ?
    1
  1492. This would be a legit way to restore the printer to the good settings whenever needed, in a couple of seconds. But how the hell do you find out which Registry keys/entries you need to save ?
    1
  1493.  @DFPercush  Huh, good idea, thanks! Didn't know you can export the whole registry
    1
  1494. You know, your computer not booting properly because of the anticheat is malformed is actually the least problematic of the disasters it can cause. That's like your car no longer starting. It sucks but there's no real damage, just a potentially very annoying situation, depending on the timing. What's much worse, in the car analogy would be for the car to not respond to your input and accelerate by itself into a crowd of people or into a building or off some cliff. Back to the computer, a much worse outcome would be for the anticheat to have a vulnerability (or Riot to get hacked and the hacker pushing a malicious update) and that to get exploited without the users knowing. Suddenly millions of computers can have all the data on their system leaked, or all the computers starting to do stuff on their own like posting really offensive stuff on the internet, it could be part of a gigantic DDoS attack or it can simply be used by a deranjed individual which might simply delete and scramble all the data on the drive, making it unable to be used without a full reinstall, and also all the data unrecoverable from the local drives. The potential for damage is off the charts, really. And just like the Crowdstrike update, it might take for someone to actually do something this disatreous for people to realize what they're doing. Absolute insane dystopian times we're living, jeez.
    1
  1495. Bro, WTF are you smoking ? If you go outside Laravel to do ... what, bare PHP ? The PHP manual (which you can download and have it offline too) is all you need for that. And even so, there are gigantic amounts of documentation on PHP stuff. The problem is that is 1) too much, 2) sometimes outdated (PHP soon will be 30 yo, soo.. yeah) or 3) plain wrong because it's from 2 junior developers trying stuff and geting only a minimal unsafe result that solved their problem (and this is truly a problem, but it slowly getting better). But documentation in general is plenty if you search for it.
    1
  1496.  @Szergej33  For me the syntax was always the strong point. Neither too verbose neither too scriptic / symbolic. And also what I like most is that is multiparadigm and easy to learn. You can literally start learning programming with PHP and grow with it. Technically you can only do PHP, though it's recommended to learn other languages, at least to know what's there and to learn more concepts.
    1
  1497. This needs more upvotes so the bot who copied this comment is buried. While you're here, if you saw the bot comment(s) (the one with a lady-like icon and having \n\n instead of actual new lines) please report it. Thank you!
    1
  1498. He says 30 miles. The pronunciation is a bit off.
    1
  1499.  @ryanstallbaumer  What if you get booted out of your own project for refusing to work with such a person, which only joined the project like 3 months ago ?
    1
  1500.  @protocetid  Yeah, that's a good parallel. I can only wish it also turns true.
    1
  1501.  @lprimak  Unfortunately or not, that's not simply a take, that's the definition of high vs low level languages, even though, indeed, in today's world a low level language is pretty narrow, and there's quite the variance between the high level languages. Because of this, people started using terms like "higher" and "lower" level languages, while still talking about high level languages. And at some point some people simply started to call them "high" or "low" instead of "higher" and "lower". Thing is, a high level language allows abstractions. With good enough libraries, you could have quite some easy time in C too, only calling simple functions. There's also the term of "medium level" language specifically for C class of programs, where it is a high level language, but where you do have access to pointers and high degree of control in general. Like alansaunders1828 said above, we already have multiple levels, not just two, neither 3 and to actually be useful, I'd say that a new definition need to arise, maybe something like that the levels of autonomy of cars. So a level 1 language is assembler aka low level - full access, most likely not portable and all the way up to a level 5 or 10 which would be probably something interpreted, garbage collected and so on.
    1
  1502.  @jayjohn9680  Dude, what the hell, what subway connections ? What you just said had nothing to do with what I said. I was comparing the technologies, because everybody is super hyped over this nothingburger that is this tunnel ride. As if it's some marvelous futurist thing when it totally isn't. The argument was that if INSTEAD of this miniscule completely-lacking-safety-features tunnel with cars was a normal subway tunnel with a subway train (or even buses, truth to be told) it would be able to carry much more and be more efficient. Okay, the top speed would be lower, but not by that much, trains can very well accelerate too. The idea of having individual cars only works for low amounts of people. Which for this ride is okay, 3 whole "stations" and almost one mile. Scaling to a city would be a disaster. I don't get it why people fail to realize this trivial thing.
    1
  1503.  @Ben-ts7ut  Yup. But if you already transplaced the results into text, then it is a bit tedious to change it. Technically you can have in a Word/Google Docs document values from an Excel/Google Sheets spreadsheet, but that's quite tedious to set up as well.
    1
  1504.  @trumpetbob15  Interesting, good to know, thanks!
    1
  1505. Luați de aici, sunt gratis: ă â î ș ț Ă Â Î Ș Ț Cu plăcere!
    1
  1506.  @WhatsACreel  No, it made sense. Having ANDs instead of DIVs (well, mod by 10 I think would've been for taking the digits in base 10)
    1
  1507. Regarding that totally not smooth break, Thunderf00t briefly commented about it in the video.
    1
  1508. Wanted to mention the same thing, but you beat me to it.
    1
  1509. I would have said "thanks captain Obvious", but after seeing a lot of comments, there are actually many people who didn't got the memo.... sigh.
    1
  1510. Yes, the lengths at which 14nm was stretched is quite extraordinary. If we were to compare a 6700K versus, say, a 10700K... I truly wonder, if you take a 10700K or a 10900K and set the clocks to be the same as 6700K, and also disable cores so it's also 4c/8t, how much less power would it consume ? Or how much better it would perform with the same power usage, but with frequencies and/or cores unlocked (including having 8c/8t). Anyhow, I kind of feel bad for Bob Swan. It seems that the company is coming back with Alder Lake, as late as it is. It seems as Intel is getting a new tempo now, and Bob Swan is getting the short stick of it. Of course, at the end of the day, we can all appreciate the engineering part of Intel, while also acknowledge how bad and evil their marketing and some business decisions are. And those didn't get better under Bob Swan. That's what I hope that maybe Pat Gelsinger can change.
    1
  1511. At this rate it might simply make more sense to simply order a cab everytime you need a ride.
    1
  1512. Nope. Joker didn't catch that.
    1
  1513. If I'm not mistaken, the mainframes that IBM still make, that have names starting with Z, those have a UNIX OS or something similar. Certainly UNIX certified (which Linux isn't, though it's mostly compatible). And that OS, from what I've heard, yeah, is proprietary, but not clearly garbage. They're doing very interesting things there. A shame that it's so unknown to the general public.
    1
  1514.  @kristofor1221  I understood what was about, but have you actually checked the quote I gave ? It's factually incorrect, he specifically said that it's 71% of all PCs that run Windows 10.
    1
  1515.  @igoralmeida9136  Or instead of going bankrupt, they might boot off the woke management which are wasting a lot of that Google's money into useless projects (usually DEI) and have the revenue go to the devs. Which might make them get even more revenue later, if people see that they're no longer wasted on propaganda.
    1
  1516. Fortunately, he has a thick enough skin.
    1
  1517. Firm leakage YES
    1
  1518. Functional or procedural ? I have this vague feeling that you're actually referring to procedural.
    1
  1519.  @Morokiane  What censorship ? Also, I REALLY have to ask... is Google better ? Because if firefox dies, we'll have only minimalist browsers and chromium-based browsers for at least several years.
    1
  1520.  @lemonheins2720  Why dog shit ? And care about what ? Because, while I'm worried about Mozilla, I totally do not trust Google, and I know that Google cares much more about power and money than about the normal users.
    1
  1521. For me it's not that unexpected. I didn't knew he was planning (and for so long) to have a new channel. But, he did mention that he's trading a lot in at least one HeyDT videos, so I knew about that part. And the new channel, can't say I'm too surprised even if I didn't knew. Regarding what he's focusing on the FOSS world, he kind of already touched on everything, talked about it, made a video or an answer in a HeyDT video about it. Going forward there would be much rehashing the same things, just with minor changes, especially obvious for the "take a quick look at distro X" when there's new versions. For vim and emacs, there's not much to do/say. A lot of other CLI utilities, not much to say extra. So he's kind of out of new topics (and I say it was a bit visible) unless he forces himself to find new ones.
    1
  1522. Good point! I think you can make a definition that's more precise - if something sounds like its trolling, then the owner should provide some id or some other proof that that is its actual name / title /pronoun. If not, then kindly asked to change it. This will weed out people like you said, to which I can add another one "God Allmight Himself". But if that person can provide proof that its name is actually "Pussy Slayer" (who knows, maybe some jurisdition somewhere allows it) then that can stay.
    1
  1523. Sees the bullet hole in the head... - Yup, died from Covid... damn people, still not wearing masks...
    1
  1524. 11:42 The global market share for electric cars, in 2018 and 2019, was 2%. If I read that correctly, that means that the total number of electric cars in use total at 2%. But what matters is the NEW cars market share. And I have a vague feeling that it's more than 2%. In Norway, in 2019, there were more new electric cars sold that ICE cars. Sure, it's a lower percent in the rest of the world, but I wouldn't be surprized to find it to be 10-15%.
    1
  1525. I would also like to note that GTX 1060 6 GB on mobile HAS THE SAME NUMBER OF CORES as the desktop 1060 6 GB. You know, back then, if you read 1060, you knew what to expect. Nowadays, a 3080 mobile GPU is around desktop 3070 in performance. MUCH LOWER than a desktop 3080.
    1
  1526.  @HamidKarzai  It's true that you'd have to check the news to be safe. But it's also an option. I know that people are not happy with things like this and the general direction. I'm not happy either. But realistically it's still a very good capable browser and it can still be easily made good, fortunately. And what I think most don't... try? is that ditching Firefox won't make them learn the lesson or change. It will simply kill Firefox. Instead you can try to change their ways by participating on the debates and things like that. Not by just boycotting. Who knows, maybe Ladybird will take off and then people will jump on that and Firefox might actually die then. Or Mozilla start being reasonable (though it might be a bit too late). Who knows.
    1
  1527. The rotting argument I feel is waaaaay overblown. Just that it happens to be a bit more production than demand and cars are a bit more accumulated and maybe spent several months in some parking lots doesn't mean they're rotting. I mean, yeah, they're sitting there doing nothing, but they don't decay as if they're a fresh vegetable. I'd say they need at least one year of sitting to be called rotting. Then it will be a significant problem. Right now I feel like it's only a minor hiccup.
    1
  1528.  @frankt2658  Ok, that does sound bad. When I saw the news a couple of weeks ago they were only showing like 50 cars in some random car lot. And overall it felt like it was several hundreds or thousands that aren't sold for a couple of months or so. And that it made a bit of panic because the EV sales are no longer increasing.
    1
  1529. 2-3 and half years ? That's nothing! Hate to be that guy, but my Windows 10 install on my over 7 years old laptop is still doing very fine. Never reinstalled it. And I'm sure that it can still do 100 days uptime just fine, but I can't test that now, I'm dual booting into Gentoo. Hope that by the summer I'll be able to do everything in Gentoo. And I also hope that maybe this year I'll finally find and buy the next laptop that will serve me for another 7, preferably 10 years. Anyway, I'm getting off topic. It's good to see people taking time off to chill, arrange stray ends in their lives, maybe even meditate a bit. And it's very nice to see the massively positive reaction from the comment section. I hope this becomes more common, with people being more responsable and less obsessed about the internet life, especially a ranking algorithm. It's good for the audience too, if they at one point have no videos to watch, they migth be a bit more productive that day (or simply find something new)
    1
  1530. Can we also talk about the TOTAL lack of responsability ? The idea that if X convinces Y of something, it's not Y's fault, it's X's ? You know, the basis of censorship - don't read/listen to A or B, because you're too dumb to realize it's not good, therefore "we" have to restrict your access to it. It's not like this kind of censorship went into really awful stuff 100% of the time... I mean, if someone is converted out of christianity ... why is the random guy on the internet guilty for that ? Maybe it's God's way of testing his subjects, what do you know and care ? And what happens someone comes to the conclusion that God is not real by itself ? We must pray the all-knowing God, but God-forbid us of learning logic, or we might have second-guesses of this all-mighty God and its religion. Does that make sense ? Every input you have, must be considered and it's you alone that comes to a conclusion. And by that, you're solely responsable for that. If the beliefs are so easily challenged... maybe God should up its game ?
    1
  1531. Since 6 years has passed, $200 in 2015 is about $225-230 now when adjusting to inflation. Which is still missing, mind you, but just wanted to make people aware that $200 in 2021 actually is a really low price.
    1
  1532. Nice grooviks cube at the end
    1
  1533. I wouldn't be surprised if for the 4K stream it would use only 15W. Because it's using the hardware decoder, the CPU is barely used (certainly not in 100% as it is in sysbench)
    1
  1534. It's insane how long I had to scroll to see this first (and possibly only) mention of SearX. Not exactly for the general public, but certainly worth a mention.
    1
  1535. I agree a bit with one thing that she said: if you're actually poor and $5 mean a lot to you (in general, paying her entitled ass is out of question here) then you shouldn't spend time on twitch. In general (several days per month can be an exception) if you are not certain of what you're going to eat or do in the next day or month, your priorities should totally not be twich. There's A LOT of stuff to be done in this world. Paying attention to what's needed in the communities that you are part of or care about and trying to help them can get you very far. Not only in getting some extra income (even though it's usually not much, but it's honest) but also respect and goodwill. And you'll definitely have a better time than to watch some arrogant thot spewing her out-of-touch toxic comments.
    1
  1536. DT doesn't have Windows experience (at least not recent one) so how could he make a course for experienced Windows users, if he doesn't know what they know and like ? For that, Chris Titus Tech would be BY FAR the best candidate. He is actually very knowledgeable about Windows, even written software for it, including a debloating tool. And he knows Linux too, on a decently advanced level.
    1
  1537. What, really ?
    1
  1538.  @gc2696  I checked that one and a few others. I'm sorry, but, as much as I dislike China's government, I have to call bullshit on this one. Couldn't find the slightest evidence for that, and I see absolutely no reason for them to do it.
    1
  1539. I'd be really interested to see some numbers about the energy needed to maintain and operate. Being in a vacuum will reduce the energy needed for the train, since it won't need to combat air drag, buuut, on the other hand, maintaining a vacuum requires how much energy ? From what I've seen so far, this vacuum maintenance far exceeds the energy needed for the train & track itself, which will inevitably make it (much) more expensive than maglevs. The solar panels won't cut it. Not even close. (Also as a side note, nothing stops maglev routes to have solar panels too). Since maglevs need a lot of population density to be economically viable, I don't see the Hyperloop being economically viable for normal transport in the next (literally) 100 years.
    1
  1540. LoL! And MOOTools ... whatever version they had + 1
    1
  1541. Thank you for mentioning the motivation for the buyer! I'm not familiar with iCracked, since I'm not from US and didn't see Louis' other videos about them. But immediately when he said they were bought I thought that maybe the ones that bought them actually wanted to buy them just to close them. And be subsidezed in the back by somebody like Apple. It would be a small price for them to pay, to have the repair industry still in the mud.
    1
  1542.  @pcislocked  Are you sure ? From what I know, up until rather recently (1.14?) Minecraft was fairly single threaded.
    1
  1543. I remember, though I might be wrong, that Intel wanted to have a yearly release cycle. For now, Battlemage seems to be arriving at exactly 2 years after Alchemist, but like you said, I think they had to wait to sort the driver issues. The driver is still not perfect, but it's actually usable for a good bunch of people now. What I fear most with Battlemage is that it's again a bit too late. If its top SKU fights with RTX 4060 or RTX 4070 or RX 7700X, at 250W ... and then both NVidia and AMD launch a new xx70 or xx60 class GPU 5 months later ... then Battlemage would have again to be extremely low priced, in order to be competitive ... which might mean very well that it's sold at a cost by Intel. If I'm not mistaken that was kind of the situation with Alchemist. And if it's again with Battlemage, well, Intel isn't exactly doing that good financially, so I'm not sure they can support it, if it doesn't have some profit. The less gloomy part is that the same architecture and drivers will be used in Lunar Lake and the next CPU generation (rumors say that Arrow Lake has Alchemist+, not Battlemage). And those might sell quite well. Right now the MSI Claw is basically the worst handheld, buuut, with some updates and tuning, it can ... get there, so to speak. I don't expect it to win against RoG Ally or Steam Deck, buut, it can get to be kind of on the same level, and with no issues. I'm so curious of seeing a Steam OS (or Holo or whatever it was called) on the MSI Claw, I'm really curious how it would work. Anyway, an MSI Claw 2 might actually be competitive this time. And be launched in time. Still speculation, but there is hope.
    1
  1544. If I may add: the $2800 amount provided by Anandtech is plain wrong. They've converted the original 2999.00 euros ( https://www.caseking.de/detail/index/sArticle/52252 ) completely wrong. It should be something like $3390. No that an extra $590 would mean anything for those who'll buy this :D
    1
  1545. Wait, ES and Redis are closed source now ? Damn! Edit: Though, come to think of it, since ES went IPO, I can't say I'm surprised that much. But I am about Redis. Though I don't follow closely.
    1
  1546. The "just watch the road" argument is justifyable for things that are somewhat predictable, that you can spot and still have some time to react. Like seeing a busy intersection and the car not slowing down. Or that at the next intersection you have green light but there's a car speeding from the left so you have to brake to not crash into it or it into you. Things like that. A sudden command that also requires sudden action to revert or face dire consequences - that should not be in the list of things to watch for. Because it's basically impossible. If that fUlL sElF dRiViNg bullshit is capable of that (or any other system), then it should be shut off. Like not be able to use it, unless you specifically sign for that you can do that and are fully responsable if it happens. How a tier 2 driving assist can be legally called "full self driving" is still beyond me. In a reasonable country/legal system, it should've been illegal. Why does USA insist on being such a sh!thole of a country sometimes ?
    1
  1547. I wish I could like the video for the information it gave, but the skillshare ad was so disgusting, I just couldn't. The amount of BS in it makes me really wonder if I can trust Sabine in other topics.
    1
  1548. What is LTSC ?
    1
  1549.  @xiphoid2011  You're not wrong, but for many, the money they got actually helps them train better. Because many live in countries where there's massive underfunding and the athletes are more of an exception rather than the norm. It's the harsh reality. I know this is the case with my country, Romania, literally all the medals we got are the sole merits of their respective athletes and those very near them, and basically 0% merit for the state/government or the mass-media (which has like 30% football aka soccer news, 30% tennis news, 30% gossips, usually around the people involved in football/soccer, 10% at most all the other sports combined). And Romania is, overall, kind of mid-level in terms of how rich it is, there's certainly countries which are much worse off. So, yeah, $1000 extra can be a significant boost in the revenue, helping with the stress of travelling and having adequate equipment and nutrition and people around the athelte also getting to a decent level of payment and so on.
    1
  1550.  @IvanIvanov-nn9os  Yeah, what I'm saying is that a description of why you'd want to use them is missing. Of course that it's not the fault of the kids / young people that they happen to have only used smartphones and how computers work is as alient to them as it is for those at the age of 90 who lived before the computers were mainstream. At most I'd shame them if they immediately dismiss them or simply don't want to try or learn.
    1
  1551. Somebody here (see the pinned comment) saw that DT edited the wrong make.conf in the beginning, so he wasn't actually compiling using 6 threads. I think that without specifing anything, it's done single threaded, which explains why his times were so big that even he was surprised. But, compiling firefox or chromium (one of the biggest compiles for normal users, bigger than the kernel for some reason) does take hours, unless you have a really good system (16-64 threads). But then again, overnight compiling is a thing too.
    1
  1552.  @bot-h2h  Hence my amazement!
    1
  1553.  @monad_tcp  Strongly disagree. Yes, it needs money. No, Microsoft is not the answer. If Microsoft would've bought them, then it will be no more Firefox period. Feels pretty basic to me.
    1
  1554. The justification that users are human thus human drama is both true and untrue. It is true, but that doesn't mean that all communities are filled with drama. With guidelines and moderation (that is, having moderators) things can be much better. Of course, it's never a guarantee that it's going to be perfect. And large groups will always be chaotic.
    1
  1555. I don't want to sound like apologist, I'm certainly against DRM, but you simply cannot say that DRM was created "just so you cannot share content with your friends". It's so a few people will not share it with the entire world. This is much, much different, and a massive example of a strawman argument. And that is a totally possible, real, genuine concern for the companies that created that content, in regards to revenue. The best solution that I can think of, for everybody involved, is to have some sort of DRM, preferably not as intrusive as they currently are, and release a patch with no DRM 1-2-3 years after the game is launched. Like Id Software did with their engines, releasing them to the world after several years, after they made most of the money from their games anyway.
    1
  1556.  @Fonda-d3x  Oooh, sorry, I though .... you get the idea. Thanks for clarifying!
    1
  1557.  @whiteglitch  But that was totally the right call. Ebuzz is shady af.
    1
  1558. While I find this system totally stupid, I would think that on CO2 scale it would fare just as well as a subway, that is 0. Both are fully electric. Ok, if the electric power is from coal or things like that, then it's not 0. And yeah, a subway is more efficient, unless the number of people riding is really low. In any case, I don't think that the CO2 is actually a problem for this project/thing.
    1
  1559. Holy moly, does that laptop have 20 CPU cores and 67.3 GB of RAM ???? I get the cores, I assume it's an Intel Alder Lake one with 6 P and 8 E cores. But more than 64 GB of RAM ? How come ? Actually, now looking at it, it says 3.3 GB cache, soo... it's actually exactly 64 GB with 3.3 GB cache .... don't know where the cache comes from though. It's clearly not the swap.
    1
  1560. Finally, someone with something reasonable. Yes, instead of converting to EVs, we should make public transport better so walking, bikes, buses and trains are used before an EV. Besides what you said, there's also the big problem of creating that many batteries, and their recycling and simply having a grid able to support that much more (theoretical) demand. Everyone is hyped about EVs without realising what massive infrastructure rework it needs.
    1
  1561. I lost it at the system-d one.... baka! :))
    1
  1562. I'd say that it would be more effective (in general, not just here) to get involved a bit in their discussions and push back against stupid things. Just boycotting is not that effective, because it's rarely done at a big enough scale to work, they might still not learn anything aka, at worst the project will die instead of getting healed and depending on the topic/subject and how much you care, sometimes you actually have no alternative. Actively fighting back is the better long term solution.
    1
  1563. Isn't that only on Intel CPUs ? That would exclude everything ARM and the AMD CPUs. I can't tell who has more machines or (potential) users.
    1
  1564.  @lanatrzczka  Oh. Well, I wouldn't be surprised. I know they have something similar, but I haven't heard of it being Minix based. Though I don't really know.
    1
  1565. It's mostly up to them, the Rust foundation, to get to a solution. The outcry is warranted, somehow they didn't realized how outrageous the claims were, so they have to learn the hard way. In this case, an outrageous (frankly, still of a smaller magnitude than what they've done) wave of negative reviews and criticism. The several YouTubers that I've seen covering this, none passed the mark, so to speak.
    1
  1566. If the money weren't involved in why it's fast or in why it gets the results it gets... then the need for a VC then ? I think you're confusing scope here.
    1
  1567. @random_bit Apparently, as rand0mtv660 said, it DID get magically written for one year, before the VC stuff. To be clear, I totally agree that people need to be paid. I'm just trying to convey that bun getting release, INCLUDING its speed and all its features have EVERYTHING to do with the VC money. It basically took the prototype or, at best, an MVP to a finished product.
    1
  1568. EE: "We don't drive penguins" People running Gentoo Linux (or other distro): say what ? Regarding the theoretical limits, seeing that weight drop by half (maybe by simply having a smaller battery) would still be very neat. With 8kWh per 100km, a battery of 50kWh means basically 600 km range. That's pretty good. And with a less than a ton car, it should be pretty easy to handle, it should require a bit even less power, so less heat and cooling. Over time, we'll hopefully get better batteries. So, the 50 kWh becomes the norm, but the battery will weight, say, only 200 kg. On that front, I can't wait for more advanced Citroen Ami, Renault Twizy etc, really small cars, as much penguin shaped as they can be, with something like 30 kWh batteries, at, say, 500 kg the whole vehicle. For 60 to 80 kmph speed, it could get to 6kWh/100 km. So, 500 km range, which for a go-to-work-then-shopping-then-home car, it would be perfect. Charge it like once per week. Or can keep it sipping power from normal household plugs. Hell, for something like 6 kWh needed per day, it would only need about 4-8 sqm of solar panels installed in your parking lot at home, to charge a battery that the car will refill at night. Also, like others said, can't wait for the similar analysis for Aptera's car. Seemed a bit too good to be true, but it starts getting into the realms of possibility. Having the chassis itself being the heat radiator is a really neat idea.
    1
  1569.  @brunoais  Yeah, I noticed that, from some YT clips a few months ago, and that was exactly what I was referring to. I can't wait for stories to explode in a few years (theoretically it can start from this year, but I think there will be very few) with people wanting to switch but being unable to boot into a Linux install, live or installed. I just hope that in those cases, when people argue that "muh security" somebody shows them that you can use a portable windows install (PE, though I think it's called different now) to boot into your computer with a live USB, with an OS from somebody else, having the same access like a Linux boot would have.
    1
  1570.  @MrGamelover23  I don't think it will be that easy, the infecting part. Still, I expect to happilly browse full Linux by 2024, so by the time 2029 comes, I don't think Windows 10 will matter to me. I wasn't THAT die hard for Windows 7 for example. And who knows, maybe Microsoft will uhm, soften up a bit and make Windows 11 or 12 more digestable. Maybe.
    1
  1571.  @DeeSnow97  If your budget is strained, I'd say to not be an early adoper. Of course, it's totally up to you, how much of an idealist you are or how much you have faith in the thing you're supporting. The way I see it, unless it happens that what you buy is very good or perfect for you, then you're essentially donating to the cause. Which is very nice, but usually it should be done with disposable income. Thing is, if it doesn't suit your needs enough, you'll get to hate it while also hampering you. Better to get the thing you need most, at the best price, go on with your life, be productive, improve your life, and when you're ready to give (aka have disposable income) then give.
    1
  1572.  @DamjanDimitrioski  😄
    1
  1573. #AskGN What actually happens when something like the CPU doesn't get enough voltage ? (Besides the crash/restart) Does having a better efficiency PSU help with safe undervolting ?
    1
  1574. I wouldn't say that it's the worst that in this case Elon didn't lose any money. He just pitched a stupid idea. It's up to the rest to not take it seriously. I hate Elon too, but on this case, it's just a showing of how corrupt (or stupid) the rest of the landscape really is. And how willing others are to chip in to a money laundering scheme.
    1
  1575.  @specialopsdave  Musk came with the Hyperloop idea public in 2012. That's 9 years already. You make a nice point with the ICE engine, except that hyperloop is simply insanely expensive (because it needs insanely high amounts of energy to maintain a near vacuum) and really not that new. Before Musk others had the same idea, and it can be traced up to the begging of the 20th century. Thing is neither MagLevs nor vacuums are new stuff, so I'm totally not optimistic. I see this just as a 1) hyping idea for Musk to get contracts for the Boring company and 2) ways for other players to pump the hype up to do money laundering. Because what we have here and what we'll have in the next decade will be nothing really new. Unless we make a dyson sphere soon, I can bet that we won't have a commercial hyperloop of more than 10 Km in the next 50 (read: fifty) years. That is, it will still be "future" in 2071. Well, maybe then it won't be future for the normal folk, by that time they might realize what it actually is: economically (totally) not viable. Not even close.
    1
  1576.  @specialopsdave  Okay, fair point.
    1
  1577. That guy at the end, presenting Crossover... he seems pretty cool. You should hire him!
    1
  1578.  @FunctionGermany  Yeah, I think the same.
    1
  1579. Clownjaro gotta ... do something I guess :))
    1
  1580. The god of war... against bad power supplies! Very cool video!
    1
  1581.  @alvallac2171  You're doing God's work, thank you!
    1
  1582. Interesting. Hate to burst the bubble a bit, but the line up/down transposition exists in Notepad++ (and I guess notepadqq), and maybe even EditPlus 2 that I've used more than a decade ago. Ctrl+Shift and up or down arrow. Using this for over a decade feels so weird to see DT so happy and something so novel for him. Notepad++ doesn't seem to have the word/selection left/right transposition though. But I never felt like I needed it so... meh. Maybe it has it and I just don't know it because I didn't search for it. Still, the best features for both Emacs and (Neo)vim is that you can have not just custom bindings but custom code/functionality made and tailored exactly how you want it. They're basically Macros++ (I guess Emacs would be Macros#. Or should it be the other way around ?)
    1
  1583.  @dkosmari  Ha, didn't knew that. But I'm not surprised.
    1
  1584. The most sensible thing to do. I'm amazed of how many people are so quick to point out wayland's problems as if it will never be able to solve them. With the recent development speed, it might only need 1-2 years for wayland to be truly useful for most peoples' needs
    1
  1585. You're not wrong, but I find that Wayland not wanting to adopt "Vsync off" is even more stupid.
    1
  1586. My man Brodie keeps saying libfuse2 is dead for 3 years, not realizing that Jan 2019 is a bit over 4 years ago :))
    1
  1587. NVidia themselves will not do that
    1
  1588. Sorry to be negativistic, but I think that nowadays, 9 years later, and given how much capital the big tech companies have (Apple is worth $2 trillion, right ?), I fear that you don't need $5-$20 million, but more like $100-$1000 million. Yup, up to one billion. It's a massive undertaking. Monumental, if you don't want to have the "easy" option of simply getting the money beforehand, so you can spend on whatever comes up. It will take AT LEAST another year until you could start it. Not to mention that after the lockdowns mostly cease, most likely starting from this summer (nothern hemisphere summer), people will be to busy being outside, enjoying not being locked up, to care as much for things like these. I hope I'm wrong though.
    1
  1589.  @thewhitefalcon8539  It's both true and untrue. Yeah, compilers are somewhat (and I think have always been) nondeterministic and unpredictable. But it will never put things like remote API calls in your code. The amount of things an AI can put that's unpredictable is an order or magnitude more. With compilers, the amount of wrong it can do is much more contained.
    1
  1590.  @terrence8634  You said it yourself, download speed. Have you ever checked the upload speed ? Also, the speed is not the same everywhere everytime.
    1
  1591. Free as in free speech!
    1
  1592. 9:30 The case surgeon meets the cycle surgeon
    1
  1593. @Leslie Deana There's little thing that I see noone mentioned: it has internet connection (subscribtion?) included. And a decent one. Though I guess it varies wildly from where you are, if it's WOW or just meh. In any case, that's a non-trivial amount of that money.
    1
  1594.  @junkerzn7312  Hello good sir, and thank you for this awesome thread of discussion. I have one curiosity: if 3990X would've had 8 channel memory support, do you think it would have a meaningful performance improvement for your use case ?
    1
  1595. What's the thing with eating crayons ? Did one of them do that on camera or something ?
    1
  1596. I wanted to say the same thing! With composability, you can have a program do something, and if it does it well, and it's simple, configurable, modular, it can be used for all future projects directly, with no need to code that thing again.
    1
  1597. Yeah, realistically, client side you have only form hints, so the user does not forget or is pushed into providing the correct format(s). Validations is only the one done server-side. But, everybody still calls it form validation for the client-side too. It's not Amy's fault that much here, if basically everybody is wrong here. Hopefully, as an industry, we'll evolve past that sooner rather than later.
    1
  1598.  @tuxlector  Fair enough. I do agree that the talk... well, I got the point, but it could've been done better. The examples especially, way too much outside-of-scope CSS. And, yeah, a lot of minor mistakes or inconsistencies or things left out.
    1
  1599.  @L1vv4n  Thanks!
    1
  1600. LoL at the "it may expose CPU vulnerabilities" ... uhm... it's not a "maybe" it's a definitive "it WILL expose CPU vulnerabilities". I guess the caveat is it depends on your CPU. Skylake (6th gen) are probably the most exposed, and by the 10th gen I think both meltdown and spectre, at least the initial forms, were mitigated in the hardware directly. I think this is a very nice option. Assuming you have some software you trust, you can simply have another kernel with maximum performance and no network support in which you boot to simply run that software you trust, as fast as possible. Of, course, also assuming you don't need internet in that time. And whenever you need the "normal" computing, you just reboot into the normal kernel. What's neat is that with Gentoo, you might even compile the software you use to not have networking support (very niche or rare, but still a bonus). Of course, like others said, you might simply have a dedicated computer for some software which is not connected to the internet at all, in that case, yeah, even better.
    1
  1601. Seeing Jay saying that all the 4 unmatched sticks have tighter timings that the 3200-16-16-whatever stick shows that, unfortunately, Jay doesn't understand those RAM timings. All those timers are based on CLOCK CYCLES. A 2400 "MHz" (actually 1200 MHz and 2400 MT/s) stick, like the Patriot one, at CL of 15 is THE SAME as another stick at 4800 "MHz" with a CL of 30. And they both mean 12.5 ns CAS Latency. A CL 19 5100 "MHz" stick is NOT looser on timings than a CL 16 3200 "MHz" stick. It's actually much faster (lower latencies), while also having much more bandwidth (more transfers per second). 5100 "MHz" with CL 19 means 7.45 ns of latency on CAS. While 3200 "MHz" with CL 16 means 10 ns of latency for CAS. The 5100 "MHz" stick is on another league, as it's much much faster than the... all the others in this video. And 7-8 ns of latency is about as good as you can get, while 10 ns is average to good (on desktop)
    1
  1602. I agree that the supply chain is the motive that they cannot repair in a reasonable timeframe. BUUUT, it's completely their making, their choice, their problem, their mistake for having this. I do not see this as a good enough argument. Legislation should not care about this. If you can produce new cars, then you should be able to provide parts for the SAME FREAKING CARS. If you have "very lean supply chain" that's a you problem not a me problem. Overall, I think that a legislation stating that whatever you make, you cannot have license to sell unless you can provide service in a timely manner and provide replacement parts in a timely manner (I know, I know, timely is too subjective, I'm only saying the idea). If you do not provide them, then you are forced to release the schematics for the product and all of its parts. In case of service, those who still have warranty should be able to get a full refund. If you do not have the ability to fully provide the schematics for the product and all of its parts, then you cannot get the license to sell, easy. Ok, I know what I wrote above is currently impossible. Some parts cannot be made inhouse and also cannot be had with schematics, as they're 3rd party vendors who do not care. In this case there can either initially be made specific exceptions and b) longer term - the manufacturers of those parts be liable under the same as above, if they don't provide the parts for general sale, then they are forced to release the schematics. I think that in both cases, when aquiring a license to sell, the schematics should be provided upfront to the a government entity. So when needed, the schematics can be made public without interference or possible "accidents" from the original company. You know, sometimes I cannot not think how far we'd have reached if we weren't so petty. What I described above is so much extra work just because we cannot have common sense and a bit of moral integrity to not steal and profit from others. Sigh
    1
  1603. What ?
    1
  1604. He mentioned a lot things like "what RHEL promises" or "what X promises" or "a promise has been made". So they seem to care a lot about this social contract of "this distro promises X". However, (please correct me if I'm wrong), I don't remember them caring about promises when they killed CentOS Linux. There were a lot people which were caring about that 10 years of support they promised for CentOS Linux 8. Which amounted for slightly more than 2 years (from sep 2019 when CentOS 8 released until the end of 2021 when they announced that there will be only CentOS Stream going forward). They didn't care about the people that went through the hassle of upgrading to CentOS 8, only to find out that it would've been better to stay with version 7 (as it is supported until 2024) or that they have to migrate AGAIN. They had no notion of a promise when they announced something and then massively changed it afterwards. So while he poses some interesting takes, overall I can't take it serious at all. RedHat BROKE promises. Multiple times. So, maybe they fix that, then I'll listen on how much thought they put into shaping the projects so they meet the communities expectations. All I can see for now is meeting the investors' expectations.
    1
  1605. It is. Though it is from 2011, and Apple was using ARM for the iPhones since 2009, right ? They could've had some input on that, though the wikipedia article about big.LITTLE doesn't say anything about Apple in the initial development.
    1
  1606. PHP pretty much sucks in general ? massively triggered Have you even checked it in the last 10 years ? I'll fight you to death on this bro!
    1
  1607. Same here, as you got me curious and I spent about 30 minutes searching, including the forum. From the name of the PDF it says it is information for repairers and recyclers, so probably you have to be enrolled/registered as a partener of sorts, or simply to their business newsletter or something like that. Or maybe it's shown when you contact the support.
    1
  1608. Yup, that's me! I hate systemd. Don't hate Ubuntu/Manjaro or other popular things mentioned here. And the popularity is partially the reason. I wouldn't hate systemd (everybody is free to create and use what it wants) just for it existing. I hate it because I don't like how it's made and that it's basically shoved down our throats. Which, in a way, is because it's popular. If it wasn't breaking the unix philosophy ( check CVE-2018-16865 to see why. Having journalctl broken and impossible to be replaced is perfect example of what's wrong with not following the unix philosophy) or if it wasn't used so widely, I wouldn't hate it. But these two together make me hate it.
    1
  1609. Soooo, as someone who hasn't seen the best movie ever, is there a timestamp AFTER the spoilers are said ? Or Louis just rambles about it until the end of the video ? I actually want to see the movie, if Louis said it's great and that it made him think.
    1
  1610. So you're not using systemd ? We might be on the same page for once. I'm curious, what's your take on systemd ? Why openrc over systemd ? Especially since systemd is pushed by them very Red Hat.
    1
  1611. You know, theoretically speaking, just because something worked/was used before should not be an argument of continuing doing so. That is, if we have a bad habit and it works (very subjective term) that shouldn't be an argument for us not evolving to a better state. I guess here it's better legally but much worse practically and you have to balance them out. But I think that you, the reader, got the idea. Looking forward for hearing again about this from Manjaro, again. Just because they can :))
    1
  1612.    Yeah, I can understand that, though historically, multiple formats have to be supported/maintained anyway. If it's the same number or less, it's still an improvement over the rpm + deb + I forgot the other one days
    1
  1613. Gentoo FTW!
    1
  1614. But those young people can still hangout in Discord, it's just that there will be no project-owned Discord server. They will have to do it on a personal one. Or a fan one. Or a less related. The thing is that the project will have the github/gitlab issues to report a bug. Or a forum. It is less convenient and slow than using Discord indeed. But I kind of agree with DT, I think it's healthier long-term. Instant messaging can go south quite fast.
    1
  1615. He did try NixOS! That's how I heard about it, seen a video from DT.
    1
  1616. Yeah, that confused the heck out of me too.
    1
  1617. Damn it Alex, just say how many watts did each CPU had budget for.
    1
  1618. If it's something that looks like trolling, like say, calling themselves to be "God Allmighty Himself" then ask to change their name. If they can provide proof (like an id) that that's their actual name (just in case, you never know when some island nation relaxes the law and allows somebody to be called "Pussy Slayer XXX"), then it stays, otherwise it should be changed to one that's ok. Or be booted off the project if they don't want to.
    1
  1619.  @athenasmolls3698  Holy moly, the amount of people so SO eager to point out that politics are everywhere where there's multiple people, but never acknowledge / mention that the "political" in the OP (and many other comments) is about the ones that have nothing to do with that particular software and software in general. Like what party is better in whatever country. Or what rights some people should have. Or that some campaign needs support. Or that some kids in Africa are starving. All of those should be off-topic. At most I can see something like raising funds for some humanitarian stuff, but that should be a small thing to the side, not something to be debated.
    1
  1620.  @bvd_vlvd  Don't mind Terry. He usually likes to tell people what to do, without bothering to properly explain his view. But he can give valuable insight at times. Back to the topic, I'm a systemd hater. To be clear, I don't know in what state it is now, from what I know it is getting better (maybe it even got ok), but for a long period of time it had a monolithic problem. Yes, that thing with "do one thing and do it well", the unix philosophy, that was not embraced. The best example I have of why that is bad, and why systemd, at least at that point, was bad is CVE-2018-16865 . It's a vulnerability that was found in journald in 2018, I think (judging by the CVE id). It was, of course, later fixed. The problem is that it was a high severity vulnerability and ... you couldn't disable/remove journald at that time, without getting rid of systemd completely. Because if was so tightly coupled. Imagine being a system administrator and knowing you have a vulnerability that you are forced to live with until a fix arrives. On a critical part of the system. Not nice. The thing is that we DO know better. We knew that in 2014 too. We know to make things that are smaller and can have parts disabled or replaced (for security, customizability and reusability). And this was pointed out before the CVE happened. That being so big and monolithic is a massive risk down the line. Imagine the same scenario as the above one, but in a uncontested systemd, 5-10 years later, with everybody using it. Another security hole found that cannot be instantly disabled until the fix is ready would pose risk similar to Windows XP-era vulnerabilities that infected countless computers. And the jump from "not for me" or "dislike" to "hate" is the way it was pushed, got mainstream, and the flags raised completely brushed off as inexistant or irrelevant or other stupid excuses. It was the insistance that it was perfect and that those who are against it are somehow against progress or sys-V-init lovers. Systemd is clearly very potent, full of features and capable. And when it appeared it kickstarted people getting out of sys-V mess and in general having better init systems and better service managers. But the hate appeared (rightfully so, I'd argue) because of how ... uhm ... ignorantly it was pushed, so to speak.
    1
  1621.  @jorden9821  It's not completely untrue, though it's more theoretical. If your job, what you want to do, is to be a full time youtuber, and after a sudden crisis your viewership and revenue drop by 90% because suddenly much fewer people have the time to watch youtube, isn't that a situation where it's common sense that you should find yourself a job as an (more) essential worker ? Which might not be something that you want ?
    1
  1622.  @Purpleheart62001  Jesus Christ buddy, put some paragraphs there. Also, I said one thing and you started to rant about another. At no point did I said that there's no fault in the goverment and, well, usually in all the people that rule. I was merely responding to Blues who complained that Cuomo suggested starting to work something you might not want. To which I replied that it's something normal in a crisis. Check my example above, in the reply I did to Jorden, with a hypothetical case where somebody is full-time youtuber and suddenly might find itself with a massive viewer and revenew drop because o a crisis. It's common sense that in this situation you go and find yourself another job, including doing things you might not want or like. That's why it's called "a crisis"! And, to give another example, yeah, in a crisis where people stay at home and have trouble putting food on the table, your job as a bartender for some clubs might be much less marketable, as clubs suddenly have much less revenue. In that last example, it shouldn't take another person to tell the bartender to search for another job, it should be obvious to him/her. And if a complete asshoIe like Cuomo says it, it isn't any less true.
    1
  1623.  @blues4509  Fair point.
    1
  1624. #HeyDT! Not a question, but a comment/answer to what you said. Regarding adblockers, Linus from LTT, did not said that it is bad and immoral to use adblockers. He said that it is (non-debatable to him) piracy to use adblockers. And specifically mentioned that piracy doesn't mean immoral or bad. It's up to you and each case if it is bad or immoral etc or not. It's a very important difference.
    1
  1625. I wonder if it would make the fight with Ceaseless Discharge in Dark Souls more immersive. It would certainly be hotter. Also, I wonder if it can be programmed. Then, for your favourite game, you can make a mod to properly control this thing. No more delayed heating or incoherent fan speeds. If this is controlled properly, it certainly can add to the immersion.
    1
  1626. You heard it here first! 10 is almost twice as much as 2. Which is about the amount of BS that ads contain as compared to the real product.
    1
  1627. Good question! I think trying to boot with the wrong binary actually bricks the chip. Though I don't really know.
    1
  1628. Two mentions: - The NTSync from 6.14 won't help in any meaningful way in gaming anytime soon. First it has to be used by WINE or proton. And second, Steam and many others already use fsync which has basically the same performance - AMD schooled Intel ... with a newer generation processor. Use a Core Ultra 7 2xxH CPU and Intel might win back :)
    1
  1629. I'm not that convinced. First, Google already showed how much they love ads, so that alone is in direct contradiction. At most they can say that Chrome team doesn't have that goal. But something that I haven't seen anyone address (didn't search much, to be honest) is: why the 30k limit ? If it's not in bad faith they should allow a much higher limit. Maybe mention when you install/enable the extension that it has whatever number and it might slow you down. But don't strictly limit it.
    1
  1630.  @jasonthirded  Sorry, I just remembered your comment that I forgot to answer. Apparently there's many problems, mostly in NVidia. Screen capturing when it's something not using Vulkan might be problematic. Global hotkeys for app, I understand, are quite missing. Some people (I think only on NVidia) have quite some stutters and lagging. VSync enabled non optional is also a problem for some. Apparently scaling on monitors with different resolutions might also not work correctly. And there's more. Michael Horn, a channel here on YouTube just relased a video called "Wayland is NOT ready...". His experience was quite bad, below average, but still if you go through the comments there's many other complaints. Apparently most of those which had no issues have AMD cards like RX 570 and RX 580. And use KDE. Also Linus from LTT, he had recently a video, I think on Shortcircuit, about a laptop which was shipped with Ubuntu and NVidia and, strangely, it had all sorts of problems, as if the manufacturer never tested it. I think the video title is something like "I bricked it in less than an hour". And I think that most problems were NVidia + Wayland = bad. (also, while we're here, f**k NVidia!)
    1
  1631. Minor correction at 2:45 - Saudi Arabian Oil is 7 trillion SAR. Which, if I do the math right, means about 1.94 ... let's make it 2.0 trillion US dollars.
    1
  1632.  @peacefroglorax875  But the correct term is "it" not "they" when it's singular. And something being used before isn't a good enough argument to me. A lot of BS or stupid stuff has been done in the past, that alone can't be a reason to perpetuate it.
    1
  1633. If we keep the progression, it would be 0x12d, as it was a difference of 4 between 0x125 and 0x129. And 0x131 would be 8 versions away, not 13... ?
    1
  1634. since the variable is not set as "unsigned" that means that the 2^15 bit (the leftmost one) is a sign bit. If it's 1 that means that the whole number is negative. He explained that there
    1
  1635.  @6681096  The subway is actually cheaper. Don't kid yourself. The figures you saw are for tunnel for subways which are safer and can carry much more than the measly 4400 pph. If you convert the cost to be cost per pph, and include the annual costs of running, the subway will be a clear winner. Because that's how physics work. Having cars only make sense if you want to provide premium, exclusive services (and, of course, expensive). If you need to be actually efficient at getting many people to different locations, trains are the way, both in the cost and space needed.
    1
  1636.  @jeffmorris5802  Well, if those destinations are at most 1 mile in length and they're not connected, then 40 destinations * $50 = $2 billion. Soo... even with this (inefficient and expensive) system, you're talking about billions.
    1
  1637. Agreed
    1
  1638.  @davestagner  I don't really know how much energy is needed to create a wind turbine. Though 8 GWh does sound like A LOT of energy, so, yeah, it should pay itself on that way too, even if it's complicated AF.
    1
  1639. Cringe AF
    1
  1640. No whiteboard ? Who are you, dear alien, and what have you done with Jason ?
    1
  1641. I'm part of this statistic change 😀 Long overdue, this start of the year (well, started just before the year change) I finally installed my first Linux on bare metal and switched to it. I went directly with Gentoo. In these 8 months, I only logged in back into Windows 10 (which still functioned flawlessly, I might add, one of the reasons I switched so late) a total of 3 times, one of which was only to check that it's still working and to do updates, just in case. I'm not surprised that Gentoo isn't in the statistics, it's very niche by its nature, and while I love it and I think it's, by a good margin, the distro with the best customizations possible (in an easy to do manner), I think it will always be niche. I also have to point out (fortunately at least one other comment saw it) the Steam Desktop share is flawed and it is trivially to see it. SteamOS users are Steam Deck users, which, last time I checked, it is not a desktop PC neither a laptop. Even if you keep it on a desktop or in your lap. So the Steam Desktop PCs users is actually about 1%. Which, I do have to admit, is significantly lower than I expected. Steam somehow saw the least Linux increase, even though it should've actually increased the most, since it has two vectors: desktop PCs AND Steam Deck. But then again, the surveys are only on a portion and it's random, so there's always a chance of stats being skewed by how the random picks happened. That's why it's better to wait several months too see a trend, like Bryan said in the video.
    1
  1642.  @collectorguy3919  What what whaaat ? (goblin zeppelin voice)
    1
  1643. Yeah, I was confused about that too. Well, he does say that it's ok in other PHP land, and this is pretty squarely just a Drupal 7 thing. I heard about Drupal 9 several years ago, I'm amazed that Drupal 7 is still a thing on websites that have people working on them. Hopefully all the breaking changes in Drupal 8 are worth it and the next upgrades easier.
    1
  1644. Haven't watched him in a while, but it's something totally different. You can disagree with him / his opinions (really not that hard to do that, lol) but he's just a person voicing his opinion, commenting and giving his arguments. Like Canonical doing a lot of contributions, so the hate on Ubuntu is unwarranted. I don't agree, but he did add something to the discussion plate. So while I don't agree with a lot of his opinions, I'm totally cool with the guy, there's nothing wrong. I'd jump in his aid if, say, YT would censor his channel for no reason.
    1
  1645. Why do people think that suggesting Endeavour is a good answer ? Endeavour is not base Arch with Calamares installer, it has much more extras. That by itself is end of discussion, you're diverging into apples vs oranges territory. If people wanted to install Endeavour they'd install it. If people wanted base Arch, Endeavour is NOT an option.
    1
  1646.  @rameynoodles152  Fair enough
    1
  1647. Eh, if you read the comments, you realize he messed up a lot of details. And I'd say that even the broader picture (pun not intended) is a bit off.
    1
  1648. I wouldn't say it's naive and never working. Let's say we ditch the pronouns. Isn't there the same exact problem if someone joins with the name "God Allmighty Himself" ? Or simply "Jesus Christ" ? Your non-religious open source project will have to check which names are valid or not. I say for all, names, titles and pronouns, if they sound like they are trolling (and this can be a complaint from someone, with arguments why is it trolling, just in case it is not obvious) then that person should provide proof (like an id) that that's their actual name/title/pronoun. If not they have to change it to one that's not controversial. Or be booted off the project if they don't want to.
    1
  1649. 12 pins of 12V for that sweet sweet 144 Hz
    1
  1650. Another easy example of leftover files are game saves. Not every uninstaller gives you option to delete them too, and in this case the saves usually stay. Because they might be a result of a lot of work and you might want them back if you reinstall the game. And they usually take up little storage space. Usually....
    1
  1651. 85% luck my ass, that's what stupid or lazy people say to excuse themselves or make it look better. It's more like 10% luck, 25% skill and 65% hardwork. And in that skill is included to be smart about it, don't work like a horse for an asshole, then complain that you don't have luck.
    1
  1652.  @Demopans5990  Connections come from luck+skill+hardwork too
    1
  1653. Oh maaan, he totally missed the opportunity to show a man working his ass off at that bike for 5 hours to charge his electric car so he can drive for 10 minutes.
    1
  1654. Not only companies
    1
  1655. I don't understand you anti-FOSS guys. Mozilla isn't getting any money from you using Firefox or Thunderbird. It takes like 2 minutes to disable what you don't want. You can make an account and debate and contribute to the projects, it's FOSS, if you actually care you can join the discourse and strengthen the vote when something bad happens. Or you can support a fork. Instead you protest against a FOSS project with trivial workarounds for its flaws by going with proprietary software. Where is the logic ???
    1
  1656.  @monochrome_linux  The one who installed on a Pentium, yes! The other one who installed on a 486 is from a channel named "yeokm1"
    1
  1657. @Chris Purdy You are an Engineering Explained ???
    1