Comments by "" (@just_inker2584) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

Novgorod didn't exist at that time, lol. Novgorod wasn't even part of Rus', and his history is not history of Muscovy.
1
@danutahanyga4834 it's Kyiv, not Kiev. And by archeological data Novgorod wasn't existing at that time. Rurik is a legendary character. The first known ukrainian prince is Igor, and we don't know where did he came from. Rus' wasn't exactly a east slavic state. Ruses/ukrainians were different from an ordinary slavic tribes around them, because they were much more powerful and influential than them, and therefore they conquered them all.
1
@patricofritz4094 it's Kyiv, I don't know "Kiev". It's not West, it's an eastern russian historian. He also said this about those who says Rus' came from Novgorod: "The fascist falsifiers of history in Hitler's Germany, in the USA and in other imperialist countries made the Norman theory their banner, turned the legend of the summoning of princes into a symbol of all Rusian history"
1
@patricofritz4094 he is not a "guy", that's a soviet historian, and he is completely anti west. it's Kyiv, not Kiev. And by archeological data Novgorod wasn't existing at that time. Rurik is a legendary character. The first known ukrainian prince is Igor, and we don't know where did he came from. Rus' wasn't exactly a east slavic state. Ruses/ukrainians were different from an ordinary slavic tribes around them, because they were much more powerful and influential than them, and therefore they conquered them all.
1
@patricofritz4094 he is historian, you are no name. Makes your words nothing, lol.
1