Comments by "m2po" (@m2pozad) on "LOVE has NOTHING to do with RELATIONSHIPS: setting the record straight" video.

  1. Did not watch most because I have my own version, which is- There is the partnership and within that is the relationship. Love is ideally in the relationship component but it is not essential. Lovers know who they are. It helps to be an F-type in the MBTI personality system. *Did watch after all. Yes. I know of what he speaks. Not really fond of surrender being called humiliation, but, fine.
    2
  2. Bible-izing modern world love is a stretch. As is putting the Troubadours in a time machine. Put down your history books long enough engage in firsthand experiences, then decide where your truth lies. Tell me about a love experience, then we have a debate. Without one we don't.
    1
  3.  @amiek9226  Orion’s detaching of the relationship from love is just a discussion technique, not an actual defined structure. Your marriage relationship and shared love are not considered exclusive. Now, he does take it further by defining love as being totally selfless in motivation. I get it, and have experienced creating distance strictly for the presumed potential benefit of another, where there remained the anticipated sense of loss and bitter sweet longing. But there’s no claiming by Orion that love did not exist until the act of self-sacrificing separation. As such, neither marriage nor Christianity require being defended from Orion’s psychological teachings. In my view and lingo, relationships are nested within partnerships. My therapist agrees. I think you will too. lol!
    1