Comments by "m2po" (@m2pozad) on "CNN" channel.

  1. Both women are over their heads here. Not watchable!
    6
  2. The people are absolute idiots, because the intelligent ones no longer provide input, out of fear of offense based litigation or repercussions.
    4
  3. Forget these insanely risky and expensive evacuations from conflict zones. Far superior to not use manned operations as often has humanly possible. Crazy making!
    4
  4. Please use male war veterans as war corespondents and veteran analysts for proper firsthand war knowledge insights.
    4
  5. This poor woman could not get on the topic of, male Psychology in geopolitics and war, of Putin, discussed by Mr. Sweeney.
    3
  6. Please ladies, find another subject for yourselves. War is not a coiffed gossiping head topic.
    3
  7. Fourteen dead is almost nothing for 83 guided missiles.
    2
  8. Tyson avoids responding to NASA cutting DEI propaganda, then flips the form, for Trunp DEI, with his own example about the qualifications to be Chairman of The Joint Chiefs having been lowered for the first 3 star non-minority. To which, the program quickly terminates. lol!
    2
  9. Pfft! Climate change matters!
    2
  10. This alleged broadcast has no idea that the world is not a trial where everything is alleged.
    2
  11. Cut the Talking Head nonsense. Practice shooting these missile overshoots down. Have some common sense and less news cycle Chicken Little catastrophizing.
    2
  12. Female journalists chatting about, 'what is concerning right now', is such a pathetic substitute for credentialed military analysts. Just stop.
    2
  13. WTF! You don't announce submarine presence.
    2
  14.  Marie Lucas  What is wrong with having qualified experts as correspondents? Girl-world psychology of men fighting men is totally insufficient.
    2
  15. Dems following Trump to hell. All is lost, no matter who wins. Go OJ Go! Col. Kurtz would know what to do.
    1
  16. A negro, and woman journalist giving their opinions to a Brig General on what Putin is going to think about contractors on the ground. Why ares these laymen allowed to pose as analysts worth listening to?? Ridiculous!
    1
  17. So sick of female journalists interviewing each other for third hand information summaries and laymen interpretations.
    1
  18. I disagree! If Ukraine can steadily push Russians back, skirmish after skirmish, battle after battle, Ukraine wins the battlefront war. If the Russian resort to retaliating on population centers, heavy standoff weaponry, with technical advisors, goes into Ukraine and takes out all major strategic Russian targets. Crimea is the bargaining chip for keeping things civil. Even then, Russia must buy Crimea and help rebuild Ukraine.
    1
  19. Good Lord, we just don't care about China and Taiwan, nor North and South Korea. Let Asians do what fits them.
    1
  20.  @ShuCarolina  Countries exist and will continue for rather tribalistic reasons, until humans evolve to identifying as fellow earthlings. We are definitely not there yet.
    1
  21. The US has made a career out of misinterpreting the poses and bluffs by communist countries, in service of furthering the relevance careers and industries. The world's policeman role is a substitution for not possessing a defined Culture nor a defined People, which are the very purposes for which countries exist. People are not yet evolved to be able to identify as proud members of planet Earth, as the experiment of the US polyglot society has so clearly proven.
    1
  22. Jeez, girls love gossip-style chit-chat. Please stick to war analysts.
    1
  23. What in the world could Kenya be doing for the, Ukraine Defensive Consultative Group! A Very weird placement of a debtor nation, dependent on foreign aid.
    1
  24. C'mon! Posturing and imaging chat about Putin is irrelevant to battlefield situations. Female journalists have improper war reporting focus, and so little understanding of what matters in determining current outcomes and future impacts. War analysis capability is all that is needed. Producers wake up!
    1
  25. Barbara is not competent to present information on military actions and materiel. The outcomes of upcoming battles will not be decided new weapons. The soldiers themselves are the overwhelming deciding factor.
    1
  26. These female show horses look so inappropriate in their heavy makeup and diamond jewelry, along with their daytime soap opera acting, during shallow devil's advocate styled questioning. Ugh!
    1
  27. What does Susan think the Russian commander is thinking? A preposterously irrelevant exercise, passing as critical evaluation of the battlefield. This kind of girl-gossipy, character judgment journalism has no place in warfare analytics. Clark can only diplomatically smile at his unfortunate pairing.
    1