Comments by "EE Dragon r" (@eedragonr6293) on "James Ker-Lindsay" channel.

  1. There are no poor democratic countries?
    3
  2. This sounds so internationally familiar. Don't think about elections.
    2
  3.  @axinteandrei2407  I hope they all have their luggage packed
    2
  4. And did not have territories under Russian military occupation. Which in fact did not belong to them.
    2
  5. With the recent war I looked one more time at what comes next after this war and systems. The nations and systems of "disappearing", "useless" women where the number of men is bigger than the number of women. Would they be more successful in war?
    1
  6.  @JamesKerLindsay  I am very sorry for them but they must realize that they are Soviet occupants there. Can't be puppets for anyone.
    1
  7. Then you might imagine how shocking are the American political dynasties.
    1
  8.  @TheLocalLt  didn't the belligerent defeated states in the WWI lose their monarchies too? Also the fascist states.
    1
  9.  @Zen-sx5io  ideologically the "democratic popular" refers to the national wealth. Theoretically the national wealth belongs to the people and not to the oligarchs, meaning that the GDP theoretically represents the wealth of the majority of the population and not the billions of profits of %0.20 or whatsoever of the nation. There is no concentration of wealth in the hands of some people.
    1
  10. "classless"
    1
  11.  @MC-yt1uv  it is not about the power. It is about the interest and the capacity of challenging the power.
    1
  12.  @lemokemo5752  there is an older socialism than the Marxism - Leninism
    1
  13.  @lemokemo5752  no existing communist regime could ever separate the party from the state administration because the party ideologically dictates and controls the state administration.
    1
  14.  @dashboardkid21  they were a collectivist ideology addressing large masses of industrially employed national folks, people. That is why "socialist"
    1
  15.  @lemokemo5752  material shaping material. Because the industrial human worker is not shaping the material? This is the socialist humanism.
    1
  16. It seems that everyone forgot that in a family may be a powerful conflict between siblings and parents.
    1
  17. Thanks we don't want to remember how York was reunited to Lancaster.
    1
  18. Do you mean to keep manufacturing and jobs and not to export them? And to ask them to come back? That is socialism
    1
  19. Why doesn't South Korea have nukes?
    1
  20. It is not overloaded. Usually the siblings and the family must decide to support the heir or to fight for power against her/him.
    1
  21. Of course they may do the same with China and arrive at the same conflict. Give some manufacturers back
    1
  22. An heir must receive economic and decisions power from an early age, as a teenager already, to learn administration and to gain authority. Whoever will be the heir will need the political, economic and military support of China. It will need diplomatical skills. I can't imagine a woman in power in China. Must be a paradise for misogynists.
    1
  23. Impossible not to notice that the "vassal" of China is a military nuclear power whilst the democratic "vassals" are not.
    1
  24.  @EdMcF1  it's the right time for Mr. Orban and Hungary to start a war with Romania
    1