Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "" video.
-
3
-
3
-
Why are you cutting and pasting the same garbage on multiple comments sections? Why are you so fixated and obsessed with this?
"Gullible people would believe what they want to believe and if they want to believe that anyone has gone to the Moon then nothing will convince them that it didnt happen."
The unintentional irony of this statement is hilarious.
"Even the fact that the U..S. government strictly forbids anyone else to get any close by ground to these supposed moon landing sites "to preserve the sites" wont convince them that they are hiiding something."
Strictly forbids? How can the US government "strictly forbid anyone" to get close to the moon landing sites? What complete nonsense. The 'One Small Step to Protect Human Heritage in Space Act' would require all future U.S. government licenses related to space to include requirements preserving the Apollo landing sites. It is a preservation act to safeguard the heritage of the moon landings and it is not legally binding nor does it have any standing with other nations. Seriously, why is it even necessary to explain this?
"All what it takes is that someone else, China, Russia, India, Japan, sends a small rover with a miniature camera to take a few shots of the supposed footprints left by the Apollo astronauts to provide definitive proof yet for someone reason the same people who claims to have achieved this feat denies anyone else in the world tthe possibility to complete this essential step in scientific procedure that has existed for thousands of years."
NASA isn't "denying" anyone the opportunity to send a rover to the landing sites - what complete horseshit. When are you absolute goons going to comprehend that the purpose of exploration is to visit somewhere new? There is currently huge interest in the South Pole region and the far side of the moon. NASA, or any other space agency is neither duty bound or obliged to satisfy the childish protestations of a cretinous community of gullible believers in dumb online conspiracy theory who would simply declare any further evidence to be faked too.
The Apollo landing sites have been photographed by the LRO. In addition to this, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe has imaged the landing sites which have also been captured by India's Chadrayaan-2 orbiter which photographed the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage (the orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public on September 3, 2021). They were also confirmed by China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2. South Korea's Danuri spacecraft also photographed the landing sites of the Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 expeditions. The best of those are LRO and Chandrayaan-2. Chandrayaan’s camera has a resolution of 0.25 m per pixel. LRO is at about 0.5 m per pixel.
"NASA is so special WE GOT to trust its word."
Nope, wrong again. The scientific, technical, historical, independent and third party evidence in support of the Apollo moon landings is not only demonstrable, but has a voice of its own.
"The world is not that stupid."
Precisely, which is why entire branches of science and specialist disciplines and fields of expertise worldwide tell us that the moon landings were real.
The likes of you on the other hand...
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
A movie set? Really? Now there's a thought. But where? Most of you say Hollywood, but surely someone would have noticed? Anyway, it was definitely Stanley Kubrick in the UK wasn't it? At Shepperton- Pinewood, Elstree no, wait, without a doubt Twickenham. Hold on, I thought it was supposed to be outside in the desert? Area 51, Groom Lake, Nevada...or maybe it was in a converted hangar? Yes that was it, but definitely Cannon AFB New Mexico, not Nevada...that's what they said. But then what about the deserts of Utah, Arizona, or Death Valley California...or was it Devon Island?
You complete goons can't even make your minds up. I guess it depends upon which dumb online grifter/conspiracy theorist you allow yourself to be duped by.
Got to say though, that must be some 'movie set" to convincingly replicate, uncut, and six times, the 1/6th gravity and the vacuum of the lunar surface - not to mention the precise reconstruction of Theophilus in The Sea of Tranquility; the Head Crater vicinity, Ocean of Storms; the Fra Mauro Formation near Cone Crater; the eastern edge of Mare Imbrium, Hadley Rille; The Descartes Highlands; and the eastern edge of Mare Serenitati in the Taurus Littrow Valley. Shout out to the props department too, that managed to fashion fake moonrock consistent which each of those six landing sites and collectively dupe an entire branch of science called geology for over half a century in the process. Any other rays of insight genius?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@Zander725
"I agree the masses are are gullible and easily manipulated."
That's dumb online conspiracy theory for you I'm afraid.
"it’s well known the masses are easily manipulated and gulible."
Yes, so you already said. And meanwhile, the crap online conspiracy theory that you yourself gullibly allow yourself to be manipulated by is entirely and unfailingly honest, unwaveringly accurate and consistent, not in the least bit intentionally deceptive, misleading, fallacious, exploitative, opportunistic monetised or manipulative and with your best interests at heart is completely free of vested interest and agenda? Righto then.
"do you believe we went to the moon because nasa told you so?"
The scientific, technical, historical, independent and third party evidence in support of the moon landings has a voice of its own and is not a question of belief. Do you believe they didn't because Bart Sibrel told you so?
"Do you also believe the official narrative of 9/11, JFK, CoVID, etc?"
Always hilarious when dimwitted believers in one conspiracy theory use equally ridiculous other ones to justify its validity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1