Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "The New Moon Landing: Beginning The Artemis Program | Zenith | Spark" video.

  1. That'll be entire branches of science such as astrophysics and astronomy, specialist fields including aerospace engineering and rocketry ...versus a random illiterate nobody posting on the comments section of a video entertainment platform. Who to feel sorry for? Tough one that.
    2
  2. And there it is again. Who precisely are the mysterious "they"?
    1
  3.  @KatyWantsToGo  "Do your own research" Appreciating that "research" does not involve self-proclaimed overnight armchair 'expertise' following a squandered evening consuming junk You Tube videos, cherry picked click bait confirmation bias, quote mining, false equivalence and circular self-referencing pseudoscientific conspiracy websites, do feel free to share - how precisely did you do yours?
    1
  4.  @KatyWantsToGo  That you regard research as overnight armchair 'expertise' following a squandered evening consuming junk You Tube videos, cherry picked click bait confirmation bias, quote mining, false equivalence and circular self-referencing pseudoscientific conspiracy websites? That's ok, don't mention it.
    1
  5.  @KatyWantsToGo  Watching conspiracy theorists on the internet that are laughing all the way to the bank at your expense?
    1
  6. You are overlooking Project Artemis in addition to planned unmanned missions - although it can't search for life, Europa Clipper for example will at least answer some very crucial questions about the Jovian moon by the turn of the decade. Then there is also the wealth of research that the agency conducts to consider.
    1
  7.  @BadAtTeaDude  The irony - was it intentional?
    1
  8.  @freudenberg101  "these fools" ...entire branches of science such as astrophysics and astronomy, specialist fields including aerospace engineering and rocketry? Ok. "get their information from the same centralized source." Yes - it's called testing, data, evidence and causality. "There is no planets, space, gravity, black holes or big bang etc." And yet here you are living off the spoils of the scientific method and using a device to share your asinine claims that has been brought to you by science and technology. "Finally the world is starting to wake up to this" If you think that a bunch of freaks on social media and plaguing online comments sections gullibly consuming and regurgitating exploitative conspiracy theory constitutes the 'rest of the world' - then it might by time to pop your internet bubble, step out of your echo-chamber and interact with reality. Be brave.
    1
  9. Twelve astronauts already have.
    1
  10.  @tittyrino  No it isn't real. No technology was lost, why do you people keep parroting that?
    1
  11.  @tittyrino  NASA said no such thing, With the cancellation of Apollo the capability to go to the moon was lost together with the funding, not the technology. Don Pettit phrased it very badly when he termed it as "destroyed", but he was referring to the loss of a heavy lift rocket, and the closure of the plants, the retirement of the expertise and tooling, the cessation of the production processes all associated with Apollo as the direction switched to the shuttle programme and the construction of the ISS. Building it all back has been a protracted and painful process which has been hampered by piecemeal and drip-fed funding from Congress. Artemis has superseded the old obsolete technology of Apollo but it still physically survives, as do all the schematics, mission data and reports as testament to the Apollo era. Appreciating that "research" does not involve self-proclaimed overnight armchair 'expertise' following a squandered evening consuming junk You Tube videos, cherry picked click bait confirmation bias, quote mining, false equivalence and circular self-referencing pseudoscientific conspiracy websites, about subjects you demonstrably have no knowledge of whatsoever, do feel free to share - how precisely did you do yours? Incidentally, your caps lock key appears to be intermittently malfunctioning.
    1
  12. Caps lock...must be true then.
    1
  13. "So, what you keep telling us is that no one has ever actually gone to the Moon and your still trying to figure out how to get out of upper atmosphere." Who keeps telling you that? "Good times. I can't wait for this upcoming Moon mission. I wonder if it will be shown live?" The landing will. "Ya know, like they did a long time ago with super primitive technology compared to today?" Precisely what technology was lacking? "Cause, the Artemis stuff was not live" The key events such as launch TLI, orbital insertion burn, TLE and re-entry were. "and NASA filtered most of it" You expect a continual broadcast for 25 and a half days? "and we have better pics from the Lunar Orbiter missions from 1966." Have you actually looked at the images returned from Artemis 1?
    1
  14.  @SeniorMoostacho  "Have you ever looked at the Lunar Orbitor mission pics?" Yes. The LRO was equipped with high resolution cameras for the purpose of photographing and mapping the moon. Artemis 1 was not fulfilling this purpose. Nonetheless, it has returned some spectacular and impressive images. "And NASA keeps telling us, the Artemis 1 mission was a LEARNING experience" Yes. That's what test flights are. "Has Space changed??" No, but the vessel and the technology inside has.
    1
  15.  @SeniorMoostacho  What on Earth are you talking about? "Space type cpld temps"? Seriously - why do you people do this to yourselves? Utterly bizarre.
    1