Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "The Last Moon Landing: Why Did We Stop Going To The Moon? | Apollo 17 | Spark" video.

  1. Those responsible, the nations that tracked the Apollo missions, in addition to the consilience of evidence presented by the entire fields of physics, engineering and astronomy would beg to differ.
    8
  2. 1/ The moon does spin. It takes approximately 27 days to rotate once on its axis. As a result, the moon does not seem to be spinning because the same side always faces the earth.Moreover, the Apollo stack was in orbit around the moon, so yes of course the earth will rise. 2/ It didn't blow air, but it does exert a force. The descent engine's exhaust is a gas. Although it will eventually disperse into the vacuum, it is momentarily dense enough to hold some dust particles suspended. The gas impacts the lunar surface and displace some dust with it. Even when the gas disperses to the point where it can no longer suspend the dust, the particles will follow ballistic trajectories dictated by the initial impulse from the exhaust gas. You can see in Apollo footage how the dust immediately settles as soon as the engine is turned off.The moon has no atmosphere, so only the dust directly in the path of the rocket exhaust will be disturbed. This is unlike Earth, where the exhaust would drag along the surrounding air, creating a much larger area of influence.
    7
  3. All the Apollo missions were timed to coincide the landing with the lunar dawn. During Apollo 11 for example, the temperature range was between was between 250K and 280K which is −23°C to 7°C. Perhaps you also need to understand the difference between heat and temperature. Atmospheric pressure in a vacuum? 🤣 Always a source of amusements that those insisting on parroting this 'wake up' tiresome trope and cliché are the ones that slept through science classes.
    7
  4. So your proof of the moon landing conspiracy theory, is a series of videos about the moon landing conspiracy theory made by perpetrators of the moon landing conspiracy theory promoting the moon landing conspiracy theory? And you then have the temerity to mention 'an open mind'? At what stage have you objectively critically appraised any of these nonsensical claims yourself? And at what stage have you attempted to learn about the science, technology and history of the Apollo programme instead of gullibly relying upon what these charlatans tell you to believe. "we didnt go, no one has gone, and no one may never go to the moon." Nothing like an "open mind" is there? "Why go find out, compare the facts with the b.s. from nasa.....good hunting" "Facts" - from the 'Apollo Detectives'. Is this actually serious? And of course online conspiracy theory is entirely honest, accurate, informed and consistent, not in the least bit deceptive, misleading, fallacious, exploitative, opportunistic or manipulative and with your best interests at heart is entirely free of vested interest and agenda. Righto then.
    5
  5. "I love the fact NIXON spoke to Astronauts on moon using a dial up landline telephone." And yet another dumb conspiracy believer that doesn't understand that telephone lines can be connected to radio.
    4
  6. "They can’t get through the Van Allen radiation belt" They are belts, two of them, with a third that is transient. Aside from that, could you explain why? In your own words if you can as opposed to parroting some conspiratorial junk off the internet (which let's face it is the only reason that you've heard about the VABs in the first place). "do your research!!!!!" Appreciating that "research" does not involve self-proclaimed overnight armchair 'expertise' following a squandered evening consuming junk You Tube videos, cherry picked click bait confirmation bias, quote mining, false equivalence and circular self-referencing pseudoscientific conspiracy websites, do feel free to share - how precisely did you do yours?
    4
  7. "We never landed on the moon." Incorrect. There were six landings in total. Would have ten were it not for the cancellation of the Apollo programme and the failure of Apollo 13. "And that has been really proven now when we are actually trying to do it and sending first probes, then dummy vehicles to test radiation very carefully and maybe after all of that we can land a human there." What on earth are you talking about? The first probe was sent to the moon in 1959. If you are referring to the 'dummys' in the Orion capsule, that is not the sole purpose of the mannequins. They are wearing the first-generation Orion Crew Survival System suit – a spacesuit astronauts will wear during launch, entry, and other dynamic phases of their missions. These are fitted with sensors to record gs and acceleration. Engineers will compare Artemis I flight data with previous ground-based vibration tests with the same manikin, and human subjects, to correlate performance. Accelerometers inside Orion will provide data for comparing vibration and acceleration between the upper and lower seats. It also evaluates the integration of the newly designed systems with an energy dampening system that the seats are mounted on. In terms of radiation, Orion is a completely different craft to Apollo designed for longer duration and distance The longest Apollo mission was Apollo 17 at 12 days - Artemis 1 is 42 days in comparison and unlike Apollo reaches an apogee around the moon of 40,000 miles. One of the mannequins is testing a new radiation shielding vest, called the astrorad. Also the mission coincides with peak solar activity which is a tremendous opportunity to gain more data in respect of the crew cabin and its systems. "Come on, we still gonna talk about this fantasy?" Tens of thousands of academic publications have done; discussing and analysing the science, the technology, the history and the findings of the Apollo missions. Why don't you falsify them instead of wasting your time on the comments section You Tube? You clearly think you know better. "I don't know if we can even do it now in 2022, apparently not based on all precaution and not being there for 50 years" The main barrier has actually been the funding - not the science and technology. "Moonlanding is joke stop it." Nothing gets past you does it?
    4
  8. I can explain the physics to you if you promise to turn your caps lock key off.
    4
  9. "I don't engage with fraudsters." Said the gullible believer in online conspiracy theory.
    3
  10. Your life or your partner's orgasms? ("lol")
    3
  11. Your caps lock is intermittently malfunctioning.
    3
  12. The moon is actually 4.5 billion years old, Lunar regolith is formed by the impact of meteorites on the body's surface. In contrast with the uncertainties associated with earth-based methods of estimating cosmic dust concentration, satellites in space can measure it directly. Using data from dust penetration of satellites, direct measurements of cosmic dust influx rates are: To the earth 4 x 10-9 grams/per square centimeter (22.6 thousand tons) per year, and to the moon 2 x 10-9 grams per square centimeter (11.3 thousand tons) per year. Assuming a constant influx rate (even though it certainly wasn't) the earth would collect a layer of dust only 60 millimeters (2.4 inches) thick in 4.5 billion years and the moon half that. However, scientists estimate that the lunar regolith extends down 4-5 meters in some places, and even as deep as 15 meters in the older highland areas.
    3
  13. There were nine Apollo missions that journeyed to the moon. Of these, six landed on the lunar surface. Incidentally, your caps lock key appears to be jammed.
    3
  14. That's not what was said: - "almost like it's waving in the breeze'.
    3
  15.  @brotherb5747  Thanks 'brother' - attended to.
    2
  16. And no one noticed barring a self-appointed community of armchair internet experts over half a century later.
    2
  17.  @davidkeenan5642  Or mixed footage of Saturn V launches.
    2
  18. What 'tin foil' lander?
    2
  19. Said the Man from Atlantis.
    2
  20. And you still don't understand why.
    2
  21. Speak up. I can't hear you.
    2
  22. Any further copy and paste conspiratorial clichés?
    2
  23.  @SpaceTime773  I think you may have replied to the wrong person as opposed to the OP.
    2
  24. "Only the MOST GULLIBLE would buy into this ludicrous hoax. Please kids, use common sense." The irony, was it intentional?
    1
  25. Why? The comment upon positioning the flag was: "that's almost like it's waving in the breeze".
    1
  26. Is this actually serious?
    1
  27. It's even more hilarious than Kaysing and similarly with no scientific credentials whatsoever - and this is the junk that you mindlessly parrot which makes it even funnier.
    1
  28. The moon is not "ten times bigger that the Earth." With a diameter of 2,159 miles, it is about one quarter of the size of the Earth.
    1
  29. Caps lock - fuck yeah! Has to be true.
    1
  30.  @brotherb5747  Oh Brother. I suggest you take another look at your OP.
    1
  31. What?
    1
  32.  @PWSongMan  "The moon is a source of light and nothing more"???
    1
  33. "So fake and stupid, so wicked and deceitful! Who believes in this circus anymore?! Prepare for the return of our Lord, Jesus Christ before it’s too late!" Is unintentional irony a national sport in America?
    1
  34.  @luizotavio5241  Known science is not a question of 'belief' - that would be baseless online conspiracy theory.
    1
  35. Keeping the Faith. Hahahaha 😆 😂 😆 😂 😆
    1
  36. That's the nature of conspiracy theorists for you.
    1
  37.  @sekainiheiwa3650  And yours is an anagram of Asia Hewie Ink - so what?
    1
  38.  @sekainiheiwa3650  - Acosta gastronomic shakedown
    1
  39. Your letter 'o' key appears to be jamming.
    1
  40. Assuming engineers can find a solution to the chilldown problem. It may be systems induced and not the engines. I have a nasty feeling that we're going to see a roll back.
    1
  41. That's a very long list you supposedly have there, containing millions of people and entire branches of science worldwide.
    1