Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "The Life Guide" channel.

  1. A camera stowed in one of the equipment bays of the lunar landing module was deployed by a lanyard pulled by Armstrong prior to his descent down the ladder.
    4
  2. What? You are obviously unaware that Russia was amongst many other nations that tracked Apollo to the moon, several space agencies have photographed the landing sites and that Artemis 3 will return man to the moon.
    4
  3. "Buzz Aldrin must go through polygraph to prove he is not lying." Yet you make no such demands of the conspiracy theorists that you mindlessly parrot.
    4
  4. "He is kicking up dirt/dust when he is "hippidy hoping" along. The dirt quickly falls back to the surface. Wouldn't the fine dust/dirt stay airborne much longer due to the lack of gravity?" There is 1/6th gravity on the moon and no atmosphere to suspend the dust. "The light joking dialog dose not seem to fit with what would be the seriousness of such a heavy moment in history. Would a person be joking and singing as they are walking on the edge of all that is known? Or would the monumentous weight of the moment spur a more soloum reaction?" If you think that's jovial, check out Apollo 16 or Apollo 12. Apollo 17 was dour in comparison. Nonetheless, these are human beings, with emotions - and all twelve astronauts that walked on the moon have spoken of their elation whilst doing so. Also, Apollo 17 logged the longest stay on the Moon at 74 hours, 59 minutes, 38 seconds. Are you suggesting that there shouldn't be some light hearted moments during this? "Everything about the footage (dialog, actions and the actual film) all has a low budget sci-fy feel to it." One of the reasons that you know it was real is because it looks like it was faked. "They bring a car and golf clubs instead of a drill and other equipment to take scientific samples?" Apollo 14 did not "bring a car", the lunar rover was part of the later J missions and meant that they could explore a wider range of the lunar surface in a shorter time. During Apollo 14 Alan Shepherd, a keen golfer, attached a clubhead to a retractable teflon shaft ordinarily used on a device to collect soil samples and hit two golf balls. During all EVAs, the astronauts were burdened with a very heavy mission schedule, you are referring to around 70 seconds of two EVAs lasting 4 hours, 47 minutes and 4 hours, 34 minutes. I suggest you look up the scientific experimentation that was deployed and the tasks the astronauts undertook during that time. Also, Apollo 15 did take a drill which proved to be arduous in the attempt to obtain a core sample of lunar rock. "I always assumed that the moon landing was real until now. Seeing the footage(the full footage)has really put a question mark on the whole event for me." Then I suggest that you watch more in addition to learning about the history, the science and the technology of the Apollo programme.
    3
  5.  @xrpsurfing9875  "me naive..... Haha...ok dude...." Says that, said this.... "have you not seen the outtakes of the fake landing....???"
    3
  6. 🤡
    2
  7.  @chrisrosenkreuz23  Thanks for the reply Chris.
    2
  8. "Take that you sad twat!" Buzz Aldrin
    2
  9. "I don't engage with fraudsters." Said the gullible believer in online conspiracy theory.
    2
  10. No - money and political will. A heavy lift capability is expensive and with the cancellation of Apollo it was abandoned, together with the tooling, the production plants and processes, the r&d, facilities and the capability were all retired and left to lie fallow due to a lack of political will and a retraction of funding. Attention turned to low earth orbit, the development of the shuttle and construction of the ISS. Project Aretmis has superseded the defunct and obsolete technology, production processes and materials of Apollo.
    1
  11. That's conspiracy theory for you I'm afraid.
    1
  12.  @neilarmstrongsson795  You mean more profitable bullshit conspiracy theory to be contrived and made up online that you can then parrot too?
    1
  13.  @neilarmstrongsson795  It doesn't do science very well either.
    1
  14. Are you speaking metaphorically? because the SPS engine wasn't "going".
    1
  15.  @chrisrosenkreuz23  I wasn't intending to 'nit-pick' or be in the slightest bit pedantic. There are many on here that don't understand the physics of spaceflight and assume that a rocket engine must continually be burning to maintain propulsion. Very likely due to the way that this is portrayed in science fiction movies. Apologies.
    1
  16. No one. The only camera that filmed the actual landing of Apollo 11 was fixed on a special mounting in on of the LM’s Ascent Module’s windows. This was a Maurer 16mm cine camera without sound and running at a very slow frame rate to save film.
    1
  17.  @xrpsurfing9875  I think you meant to type 'bored' - ad you neglected to apostrophise or capitalise 'I'm'. But then you're a conspiracy believer that fell for an 'out takes video' of the first moon landing failing to realise that it was a spoof - you're not that bright are you. Bye then.
    1
  18. Apollo conspiracy theory - Kaysing and Sibrel. Say no more.
    1
  19. 💰- Or rather it didn't.
    1
  20. It isn't a failed attempt though. The SLS is a new rocket on its maiden flight. This is absolutely to be expected. The chilldown problems were caused by a defective/erroneous sensor, the subsequent hydrogen leak was nothing unusual in spaceflight whatsoever and the launch scrubbed as a precaution. It needed to be rolled back because the termination system required re-recertification beyond that week, and this can only be done in the VAB. Apollo 16 was also rolled back in from the pad and delayed a month. When it does launch and Orion orbits the moon, you will simply claim that is faked too. And what does being unmanned have to do with anything?
    1
  21.  @neilarmstrongsson795  It isn't a failed attempt though. The SLS is a new rocket on its maiden flight. This is absolutely to be expected. The chilldown problems were caused by a defective/erroneous sensor, the subsequent hydrogen leak was nothing unusual in spaceflight whatsoever and the launch scrubbed as a precaution. It needed to be rolled back because the termination system required re-recertification beyond that week, and this can only be done in the VAB. Apollo 16 was also rolled back in from the pad and delayed a month. When it does launch and Orion orbits the moon, you will simply claim that is faked too. And what does being unmanned have to do with anything?
    1