Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "Paul Joseph Watson" channel.

  1. 1
  2. "So you have an open mind?" Yes enhanced by a critical faculty - but not to the extent that my brain falls out. I've noticed that conspiracy theorists tend to mistake their innate impressionable suggestibility, arguments from ignorance and incredulity for an "open mind". "You don't believe everything that is taught you." As I said, if it is measurable, testable, demonstrable and independently verifiable as has been invariably the case throughout my education - then there is no cause to do otherwise. However in cases of conflicting evidence objective critical enquiry and the scientific method has served me well. "For all I know (and by the rapidity of your response you could hardly have watched any of the links I posted)" Links that have been batted endlessly about the echochamber of YouTube conspiracy theory for years. "What in the World are they Spraying" has been comprehensively debunked, The ludicrous Carnicom Institute does not stand up to independent scientific scrutiny and Ccrow777 is a certifiable lunatic. Find me some legitimate hard data evidencing your chemtrails outside your internet bubble published by a reputable atmopsheric scientist. Good luck with that "you are just somebody who wants a fight." On the contrary, I am simply someone challenging your baseless conspiracy addled claims over the comments section of YouTube which I am at perfect liberty to do. "So you get on with your life and pretend that "Agent Orange" never happened." The deployment of Agent Orange as a defoliant during the Vietnam War is well documented - chemtrails are not. What does this have to do with an exhaust contrail six to eight miles above your head, the wake vortices featured in this footage or Stratopsheric Aerosol Injection which as I explained would take place in the mid stratosphere and be invisible to ground based observation? "You seem to be one of those people who will only take notice when your kid has taken in so much wonderful Aluminium that their body and mind are breaking down." Aluminium is the third most abundant element on the planet and it is impossible to avoid contact in our daily lives through anthropological and natural origin. Not even extreme cases of occupational exposure would wreak the physiological effects that you refer to. "You sir are a being given life. Live your life and breathe deep of the fresh air around you. I hope to god you don't live near Mt.Shasta." I do...I have alpine climbed since the age of nine and worked on four continents as a mountain guide. I also lived for a short period of time in Lassen and having climbed Mt. Shasta three times can testify to the excellent natural mountain spring at Horse Camp. However I would advise iodine treatment, filtration or boiling of any snow of meltwater due to natural microbial content. "Please do not reply. You pull up racing videos to support your argument!!!!! Hahhahahahahaha" Indeed - an F1 car producing an aerodynamic contrail - precisely the mechanism accounting for the phenomenon captured in the video that you are trolling. Would you like me to explain it to you?
    1
  3. Please don't take this personally, because I have no doubt that your intentions are benign Greg - but you are without rival the most inept and incompetent wannabe conspiracy theorist that think I have ever encountered online - and on the comments section of YouTube that really is quite an achievement. "The link has evidence on the aluminium count on Mt.Shasta snow. It is ten years old. I'm sure there are newer reports." Unbelievably, your link is taken from "Contrail Science" which is a chemtrail debunking site set up by Metabunk's Mick West. Your confirmation bias is so desperate you didn't even bother to check your source. Here is their full summary of "What in the World are they Spraying" containing your extract in its full context which completely demolishes the Mount Shasta pond tests - one of the cornerstones of the movie. http://contrailscience.com/what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/ And why Mount Shasta? - simply because chemtrails conspiracy protagonist Dane Wigington lives a few miles down the road in his seven acre ranch. You'll find that there is also a discussion about the ubiquity of aluminium, but allow me to explain a few things to you myself in the hope that you will avoid future humiliation. Please read the following carefully. Aluminium and its compounds comprise about 8% of the Earth’s surface; aluminium occurs naturally in silicates, cryolite, and bauxite rock. Aluminium has combines with other elements to form compounds. Natural processes account for most of the redistribution of aluminium in the environment. Acidic precipitation mobilises aluminium from natural sources, and direct anthropogenic releases of aluminium compounds associated with industrial processes occur mainly to air. Certain uses also lead to the presence of aluminium in drinking water and foodstuffs. Worldwide, the largest source of airborne mineral dust is the Sahara Desert, which produces up to 200 million tons per year. The second largest source is the Gobi Desert of China. These mineral dusts are composed mainly of silicon and aluminium oxides. None of these supposed chemtrails tests have ever found aluminium in its "free form" as conspiacy theorists claim. On the few occasions that samples have been submitted to analytical laboratories (for example the pond sludge given to Basic Laboratories, Redding CA), they have simply done what they were tasked to do. It's also important to stress that the results do not mean that there is metallic aluminium present in the water. The international standard test method used is a technique called ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry). This works is by turning the sample into a plasma (essentially a very hot ionised gas, up to about 10,000 degrees C). This breaks down all the substances in the sample into their constituent atoms (ions, to be precise) and then analyses them according to their individual mass. So any substance containing aluminium, whether that is aluminium oxide, or clay, or granite rock, or whatever, will be broken down and give a signal for aluminium ions. This should only be used for (relatively clean) water samples. It is obviously not designed for such samples containing large amounts of solids and sludge. Further, rainwater can have random amounts of aluminium in it, depending on how much dust there is in it, and the type of dust. Plus the collection methods are crucial. If done poorly as in the case of the Shasta tests, then the majority of the aluminium can actually come from deposition - i.e. the settling of dust, and not from the rain. Again, to reiterate, Basic Laboratories simply tested what they were given....they are not privy to the flawed sampling, nor the diabolical methodology and the lack of adherence to the scientific method. The link that you provided shows the analytical report which has subsequently been annotated by conspiracy theorist and fellow charlatan Francis Mangels. Would you like to discuss his abortive rainwater samples while we're on the subject? If you were to allege that "these" findings are a consequence of chemtrails which the perpetrators of this hoax do, you would not only need to demonstrate cause and effect but you would also need to detail the robust methodology to not only ensure discrimination of your samples but to differentiate them from existing sources of both anthropogenic and natural origin. Not one of them has. "This is the end of my correspondence with you. I wish you the best. Thank you." I think it is for the best given that all you have accomplished on this page is to humiliate yourself. However, I also wish you well and genuinely commend you on your courtesy throughout and civil replies.
    1
  4. "Your opinion. Live and die by It." Science is not a matter of your opinion or mine. Rather it is testable, measurable and independently verifiable. And yes, I do live and die by the scientific method. Are you still seriously suggesting that this video is capturing inadvertent chemical spraying???? "What do Chemtrails have to do with Geoengineering? Maybe you missed something" I can assure you I didn't. Chemtrails are the erroneous claim that contrails, either aerodynamic as in this footage, or exhaust are evidence of a programme of global chemical spraying. The inception of this nonsense can be traced back to Coast to Coast AM and the sensationalist whim of late night shock DJs such as Art Bell on a brief to increase listeners and raise advertising revenue. Since the advent of the internet, proponents on the coattails of this racket have duped the gullible and the scientifically illiterate with clickbait confirmation bias and in the process intentionally conflated this conspiracy theory with areas of geoengineering in order to gain legitimacy for their ludicrous claims. Geoengineering is a broad umbrella term encompassing strategies as diverse as marine cloud brightening, carbon sequestering and albedo modification. Most funding and attention goes into ocean fertilisation however in March of last year Harvard rolled out their $16m project intended to research SAI aiming to understand the cooling effects of a volcanic eruption should a last ditch solution to global warming ever be required. Small scale trials commence this summer and will involve as little as 1kg of material - initially water, but if successful - likely calcium carbonate and aluminium oxide. As is the case with volcanic aerosols, these would be invisible and released in the mid stratosphere at double the height of the contrails that you are observing. This would also likely be in equatorial regions to utilise the Brewer Dobson circulation patterns. Once again, what does SAI/SRM have to do with the fallacious claim that a contrail is evidence of chemical spraying? "and why not watch "What in the world are they spraying" for a start." Because I am a meteorologist and atmospheric scientist and Michael J Murphy is an unscrupulous conspiracy theorist duping the gullible and naive with a series of baseless pseudo-scientific nonsense. "If you are still angry at me (one has to wonder why)" I bear you no ill feeling - rather pity. "then check out Clifford Carnicom." Cliff Carnicom? Why? - Like I said, I'm not interested in online self referencing profiteering conspiracy theorists. Got any real and reputable scientists and legitimate analytical studies/hard data in respect of your chemtrails? (This should be amusing). "Also I might add that there are numerous craft landing in different weather conditions. Some of which produce contrails." And you have established this how? You mean these? https://youtu.be/dfY5ZQDzC5s It appears that you don't understand the difference between an exhaust and an aerodynamic contrail. Look, "chemtrails"... https://youtu.be/ZlDnd3B1rhs You then bizarrely posted this.... "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe_9gSO6TZA" So you link me to a You Tube chemtrails conspiracy theory video, made by a proponent of the chemtrails conspiracy theory, about the chemtrails conspiracy theory as evidence of the chemtrails conspiracy theory? Genius. So so far, your recommendations are the following...chemtrails conspiracy theorist, Michael J Murphy , chemtrails conspiracy theorist Clifford E Carnicom and chemtrails conspiracy theorist Ccrow 777 - an individual who will also have you believe that the moon is a hologram.
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1