Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "Joe Rogan u0026 Mick West on the Origins of Flat Earth Theory" video.

  1. ????? Now state your flight school, your instructor and the aircraft that you have trained in together with your hours flown. This is a defunct, obsolete model that is no longer used. It is a mathematical description of a very simplistic FLIGHT MODEL, that is all. Have you actually bothered to read it, the model doesn't include an atmosphere either and assumes no wind. Does that mean wind doesn't exist? It doesn't model the ground either. It does not factor in the ground, does that not exist either? Nor does it factor in he effects of the craft on the atmosphere around it (no wingtip vortices, etc). Does that mean these things don't exist too? It describes a model with three sets of reference frames. These are interconnected and to avoid overcomplicated mathematics (it is already very complicated as it is) the three frames are taken to be euclidic ("traditional" x,y,z-frames). This is applicable for movements within a limited space range. It is a bit like assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium in star models, or free fall calculations assuming "no air friction"; both are not really true but they can give good approximate results for some domains of application.
    1
  2. Established science is accessible to all, fully testable and you benefit from the understanding of it every day. The fact that it has eluded and can take years of study is likely the reason that you subscribe to online conspiracy theory and junk YouTube videos that you can watch in an evening.
    1