Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "Joe Rogan - Moon Landing Footage Was Faked!" video.

  1. It wasn't 1955 technology. The first orbit of the moon was 1968. And so what if it was? Newsflash - radio transmission. It's a thing. A bloke called Marconi, 1895. Live broadcasts had been happening for 40 years prior to the moon landing. Just because you don't understand something and think that mankind was hunter gathering and rubbing sticks together to make fire prior to the advent of the iPhone does not make it untrue. Your personal incredulity is irrelevant.
    2
  2. "We all know the moon landing was fake." Who precisely do you mean by "we"? Could you be referring to entire branches of science, specialist fields of expertise such as aerospace engineering worldwide, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, Nobel Prize winning physicists and each of the 76 other space agencies on the planet? Or perhaps you mean the gullible Dunning Kruger afflicted believers in dumb online conspiracy theory with zero knowledge of the subject whatsoever. "Like nearly everything else the government is telling us. I'm getting so tired of it..." The moon landings have nothing to do with what "the government is telling" you. The scientific/technological, independent and third party evidence in support of their authenticity is irrefutable. Should we trust our governments? No. Patriotism, as far as I am concerned, involves distrusting the government. Keep them in check. They are our employees...they are to represent us, yet they are frequently self-serving. But that distrust is pointless if we're fooled into thinking that our government is always up to something and yet we can't discern when it is, and when it isn't - or detracts from genuine corruption or duplicity. Of course governments lie, deceive and conspire. No one in their right mind would suggest otherwise. But simply because they do that does not then logically follow that claims of a moon landing hoax or any random conspiracy theory of one's arbitrary choosing, devising or consequence of personal bias/agenda should automatically be assumed to be true. A lazy syllogistic fallacy. And meanwhile, the crap online conspiracy theory that you yourself place your faith in is entirely and unfailingly honest, unwaveringly accurate and consistent, not in the least bit intentionally deceptive, misleading, fallacious, exploitative, opportunistic monetised or manipulative and with your best interests at heart is completely free of vested interest and agenda? Righto then.
    1
  3.  @DrCash7  You mean he stopped saying what you wanted to hear?
    1
  4. Faking it would have been impossible.
    1
  5.  @pj-vq3by  "they didnt go to the moon" Incorrect. Between 1968 and 1972 there were nine manned missions to the moon and six landings. "they reckon they had a phone call from the president using copper wire lines to the moon.....yea fooking right" Nobody "reckons" that - only exceptionally dim conspiracy believers. Newsflash - radio transmission, it's a thing! A bloke called Marconi, 1895 - may well have passed you by. Phone call from Whitehouse landline + existing microwave network to Houston + patch to Deep Space Network = S Band signal sent from giant f**k off radio dish. Why is it even necessary to explain this to someone in the 21st century? "also say they "lost the technology to go back" At no stage has anyone said any such thing. Why are you lying? "think about how illogical that statement is with technology then in 60s to now....our tiny cellphones now have more ability than the entire NASA computer systems back then...." Just a thought, but perhaps it would be an idea to exercise some humility and actually learn about the workings of the Apollo Guidance Computer and the capability of the IBM System/360 mainframe 7090 computers on the ground in Houston before commenting on subjects that you clearly have no knowledge about whatsoever? Processing power does not send man to the moon, purposed capability does. iPhones do not send man to the moon. "also the moon samples recently collected from the chinese who sent some robot thing up look nothing like the old US or russian samples..." Guess what? I collected sand from a beach in the Seychelles and it doesn't remotely resemble the sand I once scooped up at Monterey Bay.
    1
  6. Yes there are. Nature although chaotic is replete with them.
    1
  7. So instead of watching the entire interview in which he discussed subsequent moon landings including his own experiences during Apollo 11, you allow a quote mined conspiracy video to tell you what to think as opposed to having the will or the capability to place what he said into its intended context?
    1
  8. Really? In what way was it "dubious"?
    1
  9. Like von Braun, Debus was a member of the SS which was almost enforced in order to maintain support and funding into their research and very different to embracing Nazi ideology which both abhorred. He became director of launch facilities through Operation Paperclip. What's your point?
    1