Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "neo"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Oh Jeez. What device are you referring to? Why are you making arrogant statements about something that you have absolutely no knowledge of whatsoever?
"yet these men didn't cook to death in their tin foil capsule"
Well firstly, it wasn't a "tin foil capsule". The purpose of MLI is to provide a lightweight insulation system with a high thermal resistance in vacuum. MLI blankets are utilised to reduce heat loss from a spacecraft, or to prevent excessive heating through heat dissipation. They provide passive thermal control to a variety of spacecraft, launch vehicles, and instruments in vacuum - which is why you see them on satellites. You also seem to be unaware that in a vacuum, there is no convection and objects take time to reach their equilibrium surface temperature through the radiative heating of the sun. The LM itself was also cooled and thermally regulated by porous plate sublimation. You could have ascertained this for yourself - that is assuming that you had the will, the intelligence, or the capability, which you clearly don't. Personal incredulity and ignorance is not a valid argument.
"please. If anyone still believes this crap"
Said the gullible believer in dumb online conspiracy theory.
So that'll be entire branches of science such as astrophysics and geology, the associated specialist fields/cognate disciplines such as aerospace engineering, orbital mechanics and rocketry, Nobel Prize winning physicists and Pulitzer awarded investigative journalists, historians, independent nations, private sector enterprise and each of the the other 76 space agencies on the planet? Or should we listen to a random nobody on the internet with absolutely no relevant knowledge of the subject whatsoever that regards junk online conspiracy theory as a substitute for an education? Tough one that.
And no, known science is not about 'belief'. Yours in the meantime have zero bearing on reality.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"So if these items are still on the Moon, why hasn't there been any new footage in all these years"
What do you mean footage? Why should there be? The purpose of space exploration, which is obscenely expensive, is not to visit the same regions. The emphasis upon future manned missions is to land on the South Pole where they is believed to be large reserves of water ice and the far side of the moon. NASA, private sector enterprise or any of the 76 other space agencies are neither duty bound or obliged to satisfy the inane protestations and insistence from incredulity of a cretinous community of scientifically illiterate gullible believers in dumb online conspiracy theory. Even if a lander was to return to the any of the six Apollo landing sites and photograph them, you goons would simply brand that as faked too.
The Apollo landing sites have been photographed by the LRO. In addition to this, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe has imaged the landing sites which have also been captured by India's Chadrayaan-2 orbiter which photographed the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage (the orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public on September 3, 2021). They were also confirmed by China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2. The best of those are LRO and Chandrayaan-2. Chandrayaan’s camera has a resolution of 0.25 m per pixel. LRO is at about 0.5 m per pixel.
"nothing tangible has been produced to verify the landing...its all here say"
Yet another conspiracy believer that doesn't know that there were six landings. And I'd suggest that the third of a ton of moon rock which was returned by them, examined by an entire branch of science called geology, mineralogists, independent analytical laboratories and petrological techniques the world over certainly is tangible.
Incidentally, I think you meant "hearsay".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Hollywood? Fascinating. Not Shepperton, Elstree or Pinewood UK? And what about Cannon AFB New Mexico? No wait, Area 51 Nevada? Hold on, shouldn't that be the Utah or Arizona deserts? No, no, Devon Island Canada surely? You absolute goons can't even get your stories straight. I guess it depends upon which dumb conspiracy theorist that you allow yourselves to be duped by.
Got to say though, that must be some 'Hollywood backdrop" to convincingly replicate, uncut, the 1/6th gravity and the vacuum of the lunar surface - not to mention the precise reconstruction of Theophilus in The Sea of Tranquility; the Head Crater vicinity, Ocean of Storms; the Fra Mauro Formation near Cone Crater; the eastern edge of Mare Imbrium, Hadley Rille; The Descartes Highlands; and the eastern edge of Mare Serenitati in the Taurus Littrow Valley. Shout out to the props department too, that managed to fashion fake moonrock consistent which each of those six landing sites and collectively dupe an entire branch of science called geology for over half a century in the process.
Clever lad!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
American Moon'??? Is this serious?
Assuming that you have absolutely no knowledge about the Apollo programme or the science, technology and history of spaceflight whatsoever then I can see why it seems superficially plausible. If however you do, it's immediately obvious that it is full of ridiculous assumption, inference, deception, scientific and historical inaccuracies and tenuous correlation. The producers of this know exactly what they are doing, because it is their stock in trade and there is a market for it. I knew it was farcical, but I hadn't appreciated quite how bad it actually is until watching it again recently. It's an appalling supposed 'documentary', one sided, dishonest, deceptively edited, badly researched and aims to bombard the lay audience with a farrago of falsities, erroneous claims and supposition so as to bamboozle and misinform. I was astonished by the level of inaccuracy and intentional misrepresentation. Amazingly, it even incorporates the David Percy scam. Clearly you lack the will or the capability to independently verify what you are told. You only have to look at the fact that it's made by Massimo Mazzucco, a particularly vile breed of professional con artist and a cheat. After all, nothing says trustworthy like a man that killed people for money shilling fake medical treatments.
Seriously, why don't you independently and objectively learn about the actual science, technology and history of the Apollo programme, then you won't allow yourself to fall victim to these charlatan's claims?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Jimmy-tq8dk
"No, allow me to translate since English apparently isn't your forte"
Coming from someone that can't even punctuate a sentence properly.
"He believed in fairy tales as a kid, though as an adult, knows better"
Right. So that'll be those entire branches of science, specialist fields of expertise such as aerospace engineering worldwide, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, Nobel Prize winning physicists, private enterprise contractors and each of the 76 other space agencies on the planet? In short, domains, disciplines and individuals far cleverer and more informed than an insignificant, random, gullible Dunning Kruger afflicted believer in dumb online conspiracy theory with zero knowledge of the subject whatsoever.
As an adult, knows better because Bart Sibrel told him so? Righto then.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nodarkthings
It's ok, dumb online conspiracy theory just told you that.
There were actually nine manned missions to the moon and six landings. It would have been at least ten had it not been for the near catastrophe and aborted landing of Apollo 13 and the premature cancellation of the programme and with it, Apollo 18, 19 and 20. There have also been a multitude of unmanned landings. Six nation's space agencies, Interkosmos, NASA, CNSA, ISRO, JAXA and ESA, have reached the Moon with uncrewed missions.
the Apollo landing sites have been photographed by the LRO. In addition to this, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe has imaged the landing sites which have also been captured by India's Chadrayaan-2 orbiter which photographed the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage (the orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public on September 3, 2021). They were also confirmed by China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2. The best of those are LRO and Chandrayaan-2. Chandrayaan’s camera has a resolution of 0.25 m per pixel. LRO is at about 0.5 m per pixel.
Hope this helps.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1