Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "'MythBusters' moon landing" video.

  1. You actually think that Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage were contracted by NASA to make this television appearance? Seriously, how dumb does it get?
    5
  2.  @robinroberts7398  Honestly, where to start with this? "They are as dumb as fuck" To clarify, you think that there is no thrust in a vacuum? "they say they did all these tests, well didn't they think it would have been a good idea to film them all" They filmed what was pertinent to that particular edition of Mythbusters which concerned lighting. "i have seen many tests proving their is no thrust in a vacuum, only nasa shits can show you otherwise" Nope, nothing to do with NASA, that would be an entire branch of science known as physics, Newton's third law of motion together with mathematical axioms which have a voice of their own. What you have seen are a series of pseudoscientific junk videos on You Tube designed to dupe the uneducated, the gullible and the scientifically illiterate. "Who the fuck gets on tv to spout their unproven beliefs" Unfortunately, everyone from populist agenda driven anchormen and supposed pundits to evangelists to conspiracy theorists to politicians. No different to social media in that regard depending upon the editorial policy. Some favour free speech for all the pitfalls associated with it. Even lunatics such as Bill Kaysing were offered multiple television appearances. In this instance, they are substantiating claims with evidence. Known science is not a question of 'belief' - that would be junk online conspiracy theory. "how did they get the slot and why?" The network would have booked them through their agent to fill a slot deemed to be topical discussion. They doubtless made multiple TV appearances to promote their series, which is completely the norm.
    3
  3. Whilst you rely on junk online conspiracy theory to tell you what to think. You then have the audacity to brand others more knowledgeable than yourself as "a joke".
    3
  4. The Chinese have already confirmed the veracity of the moon landings and photographed landing sites. You need to understand that the rational world is neither obliged nor duty bound to conform to the insistence and demands of a cretinous and credulous community of scientifically illiterate online conspiracy believers. The scientific, independent and third-party evidence in support of the moon landings is demonstrable.
    2
  5. I'm assuming that you preferentially defer to the likes of the ludicrous Apollo Detectives and their ilk because they tell you what you want to hear? And while we're at it, who the f**k are you?
    1
  6. Is this serious?
    1
  7. I think you'll find that they were paid by 'Beyond Television Productions' and 'Discovery'.
    1