Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. Firstly, Wigington isn't a scientist. Secondly the farcical soil and water supposed tests that he peddles are based upon flawed conclusions and a complete lack of methodology. Moreover do you even understand what ICP-MS is and what it actually does?
    1
  2.  @cubabound2049  "Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry??" Excellent - you have a search engine...we just need to teach you how to use it responsibly. Now, given that this is the international test method standard, what do you think will happen if you hand a pile of pond sludge to an analytical service such as Basic Laboratories just as Wigington did?...think carefully now. "Yes, the USGS has a plethora of information." In respect of what precisely? Naturally occurring elements in their compound form? "Dane is a geoengineer" No, prior to becoming a career conspiracy theorist, Wigington was a contract worker for Bechtel installing solar panels. Wigington has no scientific qualifications or credentials whatsoever. A "Geoengineer"? - Geoengineering is a multidisciplinary field inviting expertise in atmospheric physics, chemistry, aerospace engineering and climate science. Wigington has no such expertise. "who works with many scientists." Another appeal to authority. No he works with many conspiracy theorists which he loves quoting on his self-referencing website...if you hadn't noticed, post 9-11 "trutherism", - conspiracy theory is big business. Oh wait... "I follow the money" Where did it lead you? David Icke's million pound Isle of Wight Mansion? Alex Jones' $53m estate? or Wiginton's seven acre Shasta ranch? You evidently missed the donation tab that features prominently on the geoengineeringwatch website. "I tend to look a little deeper." Then look into the Dunning Kruger syndrome and the Downing effect. You see, as much as you people like to consider yourself to be superior cognitive individuals with a special ability to question the government and mainstream media, in reality you are nothing more than a collective of gullible clowns who believe any cherry picked clickbait confirmation bias your're fed just so long as the words "government conspiracy" are placed before it. To those at the top of the tree that perpetrate this nonsense, you are the low hanging fruit ripe for the plucking. As much as I am an advocate of free speech, I am rapidly arriving at the conclusion that internet access should be both licensed and means tested.
    1
  3. Not convinced about what precisely?
    1
  4. This is former Director of the CIA John Brennan as a guest speaker to the Council on Foreign Relations on the subject of potential transitional global threats. Brennan discussed future issues that may result in worldwide instability. An SAI program, if ever implemented, could generate conflicts and security threats if misused. It is within the remit of the CIA to consider a range of initiatives and their associated potential future international implications and threats, including science oriented concepts - he also broaches anti ageing. Brennan is discussing SRM in the future abstract sense from the analytical perspective of a PESTLE framework. Research proposals and concepts that may however never be put into practice. Please cite the precise passage in which John Brennan "admits" that geoengineering, (or chemtrails as the deceptive titles of these videos would have you believe), are currently in progress. Here is the full transcription of Brennan's speech to help you... https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html What do research proposals in the form of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection have to do with the misidentification of contrails upon which the chemtrail hoax is predicated?
    1
  5. You mean you replied to someone that challenged your misconceptions over the comments section of an entertainment platform. Actually no he didn't did he. You are referring to the ex-Director of the CIA and his appearance as a guest speaker at the Council for Foreign Nations in which his chosen theme was transitional threats to global security. https://www.cfr.org/event/john-brennan-transnational-threats-global-security During his address Brennan discussed future issues that may result in worldwide instability. An SAI program, if ever implemented, could create international conflict and security threats if misused. It is within the remit of the CIA to identify a range of initiatives and their associated potential future international implications and threats, including science oriented concepts. Brennan was discussing SRM in the future abstract sense from the analytical perspective of a Political, Environmental Sociological and Technological framework. He explored research proposals and concepts that may however never be put into practice. He also covers the possibility and implications of anti ageing technologies. Please cite the precise passage in which John Brennan "admits" that geoengineering, (or chemtrails as the deceptive titles of these videos would have you believe), are currently in progress. Here is the full transcription of Brennan's speech to help you... https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html What does SAI have to do with persistent contrails anyway?
    1
  6. You'll find that all your questions are answered in the following link (Australian Air Services) http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/aircraftnoise/aircraft-operations/9518-2/ https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017%3C1671:CCTAC%3E2.0.CO;2 "The largest concentrated increases occurred over the northern Pacific and Atlantic and roughly correspond to the major air traffic routes reflected in the ECON distribution (Fig. 2c). Increased CC over the United States and around Australia and Japan coincides with relatively well-traveled routes."
    1
  7. Brands someone an idiot over the internet. Can't spell liar.
    1
  8.  @kevashton2783  What "research"?
    1
  9. "Its called Geo Engineering and its real." And what precisely do you mean by "geoengineering"? It is a very broad term divided into two branches you see; GGR (or negative emissions technology) involves such practices as carbon sequestering, biochar and aforestation...most geoengineering funding is channeled into one branch of this, ocean fertilisation. Then you have SRM, or albedo modification which encompasses research strategies such as SAI, marine cloud brightening and space reflectors. I'll wager, (given the desperate attempts by the perpetrators of the chemtrails conspiracy theory to conflate geoengineering with this online hoax), that you are referring Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. Such a strategy would attempt to reproduce the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols. Such aerosols are produced by the reaction of gaseous H2S and SO2 with water to form aqueous sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and are also naturally present in the Junge Layer. Aerosols are efficient scatterers but only weak absorbers at solar wavelengths - so currently there is no agreement which material will best serve this purpose. SAI currently exists in the form of paper based research and in the province of computer modelling. Fortunately, the formidable challenges in respect of logistics, geo-politics, governance and the appreciable opposition both within and outside scientific circles mean that it is very unlikely that even in a last ditch attempt to address climate change, that it would ever be used. There is not even an agreement upon the materials that would best be employed to simulate the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols - indeed, later this year an experiment involving a balloon and mere kilos of calcium carbonate - chalk - will take place in the Arizona desert to measure dispersion and perturbation. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/keutschgroup/scopex "But 30 years ago these trails used to disappear in srconds. Those are contrails" The appearance or duration of a contrail is entirely dependent upon the the prevailing atmospheric conditions. Thirty seconds? Now explain why summoning known physical meteorological laws and citations to support your answer. When you've done that, explain why the same arbitrary time scale doesn't apply to a cirrus cloud. "These are different. They linger for hours and spread out, eventually it cretes a haze. In much the same way that condensed atmospheric water vapour does? How coincidental. "Please just look up Geo Engineering. Its the "offical (sic) term" Except that SAI doesn't exist beyond research paper and computer model, would not form a trail and would take place at double the altitude of the contrails that you are seeing - may I ask you what precisely is your point?
    1
  10. Why?
    1