Comments by "DriveInFreak" (@DriveInFreak) on "Tampa to require vaccines for city employees, Mayor Jane Castor’s office confirms" video.

  1.  @GodBlessedAmerica  You conveniently skipped over the "most of" part, so let me fix that for you, dipshit: "Can[sic] please tell me how [most of] the Taliban survived a year and a half..." I have no idea how many of them have died from COVID, but it is safe to say that more of them survived it than did not. And? BTW; not I did not miss the idea that a christofascist asked about the Taliban as if you're any different. Same bullshit, different book. The did exactly what you anti-Amercan idiots want to do; turn the nation you're in into a theocratic shithole.
    4
  2. If it was just a case of stupid people doing themselves in with their own stupidity and ignorance, that would not only be just fine, but good for all of mankind and the gene pool, but that's not the case here. There is collateral damage including the hospitals being packed out.
    3
  3. Look up Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) as that's your proof.
    2
  4.  @beachbetty2060  Yes. they do. Again: Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905).
    2
  5.  @beachbetty2060  Again with the lawsuit bullshit. How many time to I have to point out Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905)?
    2
  6. Sorry, but attempting to use a slogan that's used to fight off christofascists that want to turn women into incubation slaves to perpetuate the very thing that's responsible for the pandemic not having ended by now (i.e. outright ignorance and stupidity) is not going to cut it. If anything it just makes it obvious that you're a part of the problem.
    2
  7.  @aries37  Like the flu shots that most people have been taking every year for decades?
    2
  8.  @crazyflboy8727  That coming from a christofascist? Seriously?
    2
  9.  @beachbetty2060  Oh..and: "it’s against the Nuremberg codes. Which, [sic] came after your cited lawsuit." Nope. E.G. Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995). Would you like more cases that held up the Jacobson ruling after Nuremberg?
    1
  10.  @beachbetty2060  Anti-vax imbeciles are 29X more likely to get hospitalized, and they're literally jamming up the hospitals to the point that other people that need medical care can;t get it. The world does not revolve around you.
    1
  11.  @joiathomas6982  You contradicted yourself.
    1
  12. If you're stupid enough to be scared of the vaccines, you're too stupid to be employed.
    1
  13. How is it that so many of you are unaware of Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)? The cases won't even be heard.
    1
  14. For about the 5,000th time; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). Yes. they can. You do not have the right to kill people with stupidity. ignorance and/or bullshit. Get over it.
    1
  15.  @thereveredunderstanding  How many rulings that held up the Jacobson decision would you like? Here's one to get you started: Ryan Klaassen, et al., Applicants v. Trustees of Indiana University (2021)
    1
  16. Because anti-vax imbeciles are keeping the pandemic alive, and the shots work at a rate of 90%. It's also a dumbass filter. If you're too stupid to take the shots you're too stupid to be employed.
    1
  17.  @crazyflboy8727  And again: I too will do absolutely nothing for you...only I'll skip over the mental masturbation that is talking to myself to trick my ego into thinking I've actually done something good.
    1
  18.  @GodBlessedAmerica  Translation: "I have no deference for my bullshit whatsoever."
    1