Youtube comments of Ameni0 (@Layde36).
-
110
-
107
-
57
-
41
-
40
-
36
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
26
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
15
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Nerwesta well it is better to have a smaller number of people who can use sufficient resources and lavish lifestyle than having millions who all want the same lifestyle that the rich live, the modern European ideology is based on the fact that countries from third world have large numbers of population and all that numbers wouldn't be enough to sustain them for a long time especially when people will fight for resources, the issue with this thinking is the fact that European leaders can't admit the fact that this overpopulation issue was created by the rich in the first place and had been continuing for centuries especially when the poor desperate for money and better lifestyle breed as much as possible to have kids who could provide them the lifestyle they didn't get, its very common in South Asian countries and even if it is a positive thing about family sticking together it still is completely reliant on each other as if anything happening to the breadwinner will lead to all them in poverty and the cycle continues, this could all have been avoided in the 19th century especially when modern liberalism which is based on a scientific and socio-cultural understanding of things in the world compared to the old system of superiority complex among the elite started coming up and people from the colonist countries at least started having souls and remorse for their actions and started to better the lives of those they had ruined, but now there's an issue with how things have been going, similar to a person who has been wronged for many years who will want revenge which is understandable from a certain point of view, now countries will want the same thing against European countries and will go far as to harm the citizens of those respective countries to satiate their revenge which will just continue the cycle of who will come at the top and bottom, history throughout time has been around the fact that humans lived their lives without any proper understanding or care about the world they are living in, only recently we started progressing in proper understanding of the world around us compared to those days stuck with placebo effects like religion and other things which satiated ourselves and kept us from progressing further, modern times could be better and not a repeat of the old century ways which the few select are desperate to hold onto which wages war on those who are poor and steal from them, even in those old century there were kings who actually cared for the welfare of their citizens something that modern times doesn't look for even from a profitable business perspective, by having a better understanding to the people in poorer countries towards scientific and socio-cultural understanding and respecting their culture and bettering way of life is how you can prevent them from taking drastic measures like overpopulation which they had no choice to take especially even now poorer nations are forcibly breeding offsprings as a way to survive like in Russia where this war is escalating day by day
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Well that's the issue, think of those times during slavery and when the average citizen was indifferent towards those slaves and just thought of them as lowlifes and untouchables but there were some who did want to help them but were powerless as it was the culture to consider slaves as lowlifes, good people feel the same way towards the poor and while there are some who do want to help and they are powerless to do so, the worlds more about survival and nothing else, people rather look after themselves first than others and not all people are like this, even from a personal experience there are people who do feed the poor and try when they get the opportunity to help them, the worlds about survival and just like in the wild where you will get eaten by predators or starve if you don't go after food our world is kind of similar when it comes to resources and yes even if there are people who do help the poor at some point it's unlikely they will sacrifice their own well being, the rich are in the fact that they are superior and have more than what they have and if an average person had the same wealth at least the good person they will surely help those around who are poor or help them provide jobs and other things necessary, it's not about superiority complex as you claim at least for many good folks as even rich people some will help but not enough as to let go of their luxuries or end up in the middle class, some rich do help in the sense they live in the same way middle class do but keep that wealth for their offspring instead of spending it but it's different for those rich who have everything at their disposal yet don't help and only seek after more and live in that old century mentality like almost religious thinking that their way of life should stay the same, that is evil no matter how much you put it here, the materialistic desire for more instead of using it sufficiently and smartly is killing the rich and in their stupidity they are costing the lives of others to achieve that want, there are all sides of good and evil doesn't matter but claiming they are not evil is just a fallacy especially when they have that potential but they rather live in their egoism and arrogance as to further themselves as superior
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
But one thing no matter what system is applied to all sectors should be understood and is the fact that corruption in these systems will be inevitable something that people should start to accept instead of praising one system while berating the other which I kinda feel has many flaws, i like this channel but can't get over the fact how much they try to claim communism will solve everything but it also need to be understood that people if they eat the rich will become the rich and there will be no difference as people will just elect few others as large masses can easily be swayed by people looking for power, so i feel each systems flaws should be addressed as it will make for better discussion and ways to improve or even make a new system altogether different from the previous predecessors, and not to mention how each system on the countries being applied also is completely dependent on how much resources the country has or the culture that the country has, eg : Cuba due to being sanctioned by the US had no way of sustenance as they had been outdated on technological and sociological aspects and it became increasingly harder for them to have a foothold in the global market and also corruption played a big hand in the decline many countries in the global south, but many countries now are becoming self reliant thankfully and establishing their own foothold through their own resources instead of other countries consuming their products, it also plays in hand of how with self reliance other countries are more binded together culturally as compared to consuming other countries culture instead of their own, so globalisation you could say has stereotyped countries into jobs they are meant to do for eg - Saudi Arabia and Russia as oilmen or China or other Asian countries as the production factory worker or manager and many of these countries are tired of being stereotyped for certain roles and are now wanting their own roles in how they will manage for their own citizens compared to being completely reliant on other nations like the US or Europe for healthcare which the west has a massive global control over, it is understandable how countries geography and culture also plays into how they have each roles to be assigned off but this is something that should not be their only identity, something that the west continually wants to stick them to their roles, there needs to be a balance in what flaws each countries have and how they can cover up their flaws like say most countries don't have enough oil reserves but can rely on other countries while keeping a positive relationship but if in case a catastrophe happens in a nation and be self reliant for their citizens instead of the whole system falling apart with being excessively reliant
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Time4Peace @Andy Roid well, I kinda agree with that last statement really but I do feel the US system is more draconian than that of the Chinese, the fact that people in the west claim freedom of speech yet censor various controversial topics and discussions which are meant to be had but kept under wraps for the sake of people is problematic especially for the people, so no people in these systems do not trust the government here, and the issue also pertains of the fact that the west unlike China looks to force surveillance on every country and their systems onto catching any US citizens who are expats or have taken refuge in different countries due to various reasons like whistleblowing or exposing classified government secrets, hell Snowden was an example and he was persecuted for it regardless of the fact that corruption in the government was exposed, I say these ideas of censorship and other concepts from governments exposed by various other figures like Julian Assange or Snowden is used against foreign countries who unlike the west aren't willing to force their concepts onto others, I said so the system the Chinese implemented is relatively new and it will take time before things can be stable, unlike the west which wants every country to adopt the same systems they want them to and even gain control over any of their expats who defected from the US, I do agree with Asian countries overall having a familial based philosophy and many nations are already adopting such a system which suits them to their convenience is better than having a system being against the citizens like the west is doing, I see the bigger problem being the west especially with its aggressive approach on its policies towards its people and always favouring the elite, and overall western ideas and culture should stay in the west which I agree with
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@awpetersen5909 well it was the USSR which used to held these practices and those times of the Tsars and many of them shared slavic lineages if you know the history of their cultures, if Russia is slowly taking those territories over we would have seen more more asian or European countries under Russian rule which wasn't the case, if anything it's more like inverse with European countries like Germany, France, Portugal, Netherlands trying to do the same with even erasing the history and culture of the countries they colonised, many of the ethnicities in Russia still keep their identities despite living in the same state, that claim of mistrust among Russians has been fed by westerners for centuries especially when Russians were regarded as lower class among countries like Germany or France or other countries which formerly had monarchy, Russia even if the history wasn't pleasant probably isn't looking to conquer as you westerners claim, if you known the history of Donbass where there are indeed Neo Nazis in Ukraine and the west did nothing to cull or get rid of Nazism or even bother to report anything about their crimes in the mainstream media as doing so will lead to them now having to reveal their history of working with Nazi Germany in Ukraine with Banderites fascists led by Stephen Bandera former nazi collaborator
If you claim that Russia invaded the country despite the fact that the west did nothing against the conflict with the Donbass being constantly threatened by Azov forces and Banderites which there were a large number of which western sources used to report on but didn't show enough coverage, you westerners still keep that old colonial mentality and think countries are the same whereas never questioning your own country imperialistic ways which is still continuing with how the US steals Syrian oil reserves, there's a reason why many countries still support Russia especially when many of them know exactly the history between the Baltic states and Russia and Russia being constantly threatened with NATO expansion on these Baltic states which it has no jurisdiction towards leaves Russia no choice here, you claim Russia invaded Ukraine under the pretext of liberating ethnicities yet can't say the same thing that US did with Iraq which it has no reason to actually invade using false claims of weapons of mass destruction as a claim to ruin millions of lives which it still couldn't provide any evidence of, Russia at least has a valid reason which the West hasn't solved in Ukraine and chose to allow far right groups to carry out genocide against Donbass and Russia also being threatened with NATO expansion
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Well the logic is to give away power to more corporate lobbyists who were formerly the people themselves? What difference is there between the corporate and the people really? Your idea of a free market may work for a single person but the competition mentioned only causes more problems than actually collectively work for betterment, the government is inefficient because the people working in the government are incompetent or work with corruption and trying to seize power, the corporate elements are no different from the mafia which ironically was created from the average person gaining power and climbing up the ladder, the idea of a free market can work only if the government allows enough control over resources instead of having people who will look for their own interests and seek power, the problem is corruption overall and the handling of power which happens in both people and the government, let's say a person who has a small business and eventually grows it into a bigger one and in that self preservation tries desperate measures to prevent competition from others who want that same status and this leads to infighting and even smaller underlings working under them are considered casualties, the mafia system is no different from the corporate system but instead of gaining resources through monopoly they use brute force or other factors and even try legalising their businesses, the arguments for a free market is understandable but even among people there are bad eggs which will try sinking other businesses to gain power to the top and the nature of competition itself which does involve violence will be harmful overall, and added the fact that corporate practices involve absolute control and revision over the rules they provide leads to even more problems like healthcare being privatisated which is worsening the conditions of the people seek healthcare, the current system that China or Russia i believe has is a hybrid system i believe where companies are present but are controlled by the state and don't have full control over their businesses, if they were US led systems they wouldn't have functioned well especially when for example cloud companies companies can revise rules around surveillance and the government will be unable to gain access to a costumers information if a customer has a criminal record or is endangering others and this leads to a loophole where some companies are more reluctant and massive lawsuits take place over them, the autonomy that businesses have is dangerous if not handled well and rogue companies have been an issue overall especially when it comes to healthcare again where corporate practices of reducing basic food and water needs is seen, the issue with capitalism is the fact that even if people do gain power some use it for malice and to get to the top like Amazon which still has human rights issues with how workers are treated and this reckless power distribution where there are thousands if not millions of companies where some end up rogue is a major issue which the ordinary people are suffering from, problems with communism is also understood well as the wealth is concentrated to the state and people get sufficient pay to their hard work accordingly but at least it will be less likely that problems will occur with such a system if managed well, it's all upon numbers and how much people are likely to face problems under respective systems and the way i see it in capitalism resource distribution comes at the cost of fewer people as most people will have enough resources if the government were to fail but also creates the problem of one person gaining more and more resources till they gain power which they can have full autonomy over their company and the people working under it via their work hours etc which companies have exploited in the past, i argue with communism if damages are caused it will be a big dent for sure but will fix things up if enough attention is given to it, compared to companies which if damaged can go under dragging the people who worked under it too, it's all upon the people whether they choose to have a big dent if some problems arises (communism) or to have smaller holes which eventually grows big (capitalism), under communism there will be less autonomy but also less risks compared to capitalism which has more autonomy but higher risks which could be devastating or be benefiting but playing on a balance here, i rather prefer a hybrid system which takes i to account how resources are managed and compared to the past system which didn't allow any research on how things could be managed due to corruption which should be curbed the newer system could look to how they can incorporate elements of both systems and apply those which are beneficial instead of being one sided and out of a lack of understanding cause even more issues, whatever the system there should be a unbiased research put forth as to avoid interference
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Time4Peace sorry for the paragraphs tbh it's tedious typing it on a phone or even pc especially with YouTubes UI being terrible especially the arrangement of the comments
About geopolitics, if I'm honest it really is a complicated mix of things and what our leaders do and decide is something that for the most part is beyond our control, I mean even the withdrawal in Vietnam war is arguable especially when North Vietnam had major support from the USSR in the past and the US wasn't willing to continue fighting Russian forces, if anything it's more similar to the Ukraine war now and back in the day Soviets had better technology and weaponry which the US didn't want to risk so I doubt that peoples support alone was enough for the military engine to stop involving in wars, hell even during their final years of the war they still left Vietnam scarred with agent Orange and various other herbicide warfares thus literally starving the population which wasn't even reported in the mainstream media back then , yeah I do agree with the expenditure which comes and also the people's support too at some degree but these are situations which are really rare especially when your talking about powerful people here who even today have a huge influence especially with the immigration policy pushed against Mexican immigrants or the 9/11 which involves the war in Afghanistan in the first place which they completely failed and only withdrawed the troops to avoid pointless losses
The US Empire doesn't listen to public opinions out of sympathy here my guy and if I'm honest y'all are quite naive in thinking that, wars are only stopped only if it doesn't work in their favor, look at the Iraq war and how troops are still present there despite multiple protests and the Syrian war which is still continuing and Syria even struck with an Earthquake and it's people in turmoil and the war continues, many wars which are still continued by the US across the globe isn't going to stop with people alone here and the propaganda machine is surely working on Americans long enough, I don't wish for hatred to be continued but overall I'm just saying all of this with observing the current situation and the times we are living in, I don't wish hatred upon anyone ofc but overall don't see how the common people can convince their overlords to come to an understanding, especially when this war ends another will continue at another side of the planet as long as the military industrial complex keeps going, something I feel isn't just easy to stop especially with how much influences they have over others
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@louissosa1535 I'm not a fan of conservative ideologies especially when westerners ironically use a mix of such ideologies which we don't accept, let us allow our own ideologies and what we believe in and not just force it down like the west does, conservatives were the same people who colonised the Red Indians and still carry that colonial mindset and carry that toxic culture with them but set standards onto others, why don't westerners just leave and give back what they stole especially when they stole too much and talk about their media being corrupted while possessing many of the blood oil from foreign countries, look at many conservative presidents like Donald Trump whom you people support who basically wanted to kick out any migrant or immigrants who had their lands stolen from the west and such western ideologies which are labelled such as conservative or liberal are all the same for us foreigners and we don't care about what ideology westerners want for themselves especially when that colonial mindset still remains within the west and we get both sides of the extreme either our systems become extremely conservative or liberal without having any scientific research or understanding towards these ideologies which the west were ironically good at in the past but now are more unscientific than ever, we at least had some hope with liberals since they shown to care for migrants but only do so if they are westernised and the same things continued, the west and it's people have just too much reckless power for them to dictate such ideologies without thinking about any consequences that will happen with traditional cultures and systems which clash with these western ideologies, we just believe the west has done enough and should leave foreign countries and stop spreading their influences everywhere and pay reparations for what they done and give back the lands they stole especially from Mexico and various other lands they stole in the past, America and the west brings up it's history of conservative vs liberal ideals onto foreigners who would just focus on improving their peoples lives first and respect any ideology no matter how controversial it is as the west only feels it should solve it's problems with violence whether it's conservative or liberal without thinking how much damages they do, we are afraid of that violent and forceful culture not what ideology you westerners follow, hell i support some conservative ideas but also support liberal ideas based on scientific research and understanding towards such concepts and not just blind faith and abandoning science like the west does and we foreigners only see more harm being on how these ideologies are introduced into our systems without proper understanding or rules which is the main issue we foreigners have, the west has too much power like I said which is used recklessly and both sides which we see a civil war happening as westerners would like to claim but still don't change their foreign policies against fellow superpowers and countries, that's the main crux is why we foreigners don't want westerners anymore especially when they are always at both sides of the extreme and don't have a proper understanding of even themselves or the world around them
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@weatheranddarkness the western Empire isn't the world police westerner that they can go invade others lands cause they can, Cuba isn't even nearly as close as Ukraine and again Russia had Turkey near their proximity to face nuclear threats so no colonizer stop justifying and acting like we foreigners haven't forgotten your colonialist history and propaganda as to delude us into taking your oligarchs sides
Literally you westerners are hypocrites here acting like your oligarchs didn't influence Ukraine and turn it into their puppet state, spare us foreigners your falsehoods colonizer as it's obvious Ukraine had their people already westernized by various political figures like Victoria Newland who btw were directly on Ukrainian lands influencing their people against Russia, regardless of what happened the west's influences are surely no lie and we foreigners surely do know as most of the world is westernized for your westerners to come enjoy our slave labour products and services in a cheaper value
don't delude us into believing that this is the cold war again and we need to take the sides of your colonial oligarchs, we would rather take no sides and call out western hypocrisy and kick out western influences and our people who are westernized as puppets for your oligarchs than support your colonial oligarchs again,
and yes hypocrite westerner Ukraine does have Nazis like the Germans had (another colonizer) and Russia although are colonialists themselves at least have a good reason to stop western influences from invading their lands again as they would stop their neighbours from being westernized again and turning Ukraine against them
"Fascist administration of Putin" 😂, please as if we foreigners don't see westerners as colonizers too, your people are worse than anything Putin has done, remember Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti, Guatemala Armenia, Cuba, Libya and various other countries in the list westerner? Or maybe you will feed us nonsensical western rhetorics as to have us believe your oligarchs were "saving" them, don't delude us into that cold war nonsense colonizer, the idea that Russia has some problems with racists isn't laughable colonizer, your people seem to forget how they treated migrants whom your oligarchs invaded their lands from,you forgot or it's just hypocrisy?
Finland, France, Denmark all these European countries are just colonialist nations for us foreigners obviously and we obviously know colonizers never learnt from their ancestors atrocities and carry on their legacy as colonialists, Finland and it's people are just dooming themselves and their future generations into another war cause their oligarchs can't stop being colonizers and continue their legacy as colonialists again never learning from their past
we don't give a crap about western rhetorics like right wing, left wing and other nonsensical rhetorics that western colonizers used in the cold war as to potray themselves as heroes of the world, this isn't the cold war westerner so don't delude us foreigners
Russia surely is a colonialist nation like your country westerner,we foreigners just view both of your sides as colonizers who invade others lands cause your oligarchs have the power to do so and steal their resources and lands from us foreigners, Israel is another colonialist nation so we foreigners don't even bother defending them let alone the Palestinians who themselves are paid by your western colonizers to go cause conflict cause western colonizers need their billions from the arms industry which you westerners hypocritically enjoy from, "specious", "fundamental", "disingenuous" all typical western rhetorics used to sound smart cause colonizers obviously will act all mighty and use such words cause they are the "saviors of the world"
Russia invading other countries surely doesn't solve anything but fight back against western colonialism which Russians are surely doing for their country, for us foreigners we would rather prefer countries like Ukraine never have gotten involved with your westerners in the first place let alone allow their lands for your oligarchs who obviously took all the advantages they have especially the oil and gas reserves in Ukraine which western colonizers obviously will exploit selling it at a cheaper value for you westerners to hypocritically enjoy the slave labour and blood oil from Ukrainians, Russia surely is colonialist but western Empire is much worse, Ukraine should have never even abandoned their nuclear capabilities but that would have also meant your westerners would have invaded their lands culturally and westernized their people like your oligarchs did with our countries,
colonizers especially superpowers who are influenced by western ideals are surely causing all the troubles for your oligarchs to be the "saviors ", while we foreigners obviously know who's the culprits here, we would rather rid of all foreign colonizers especially westerners and their influences kicking out anyone who abides by western ideals
1
-
@weatheranddarkness the western Empire isn't the world police westerner that they can go invade others lands cause they can, Cuba isn't even nearly as close as Ukraine and again Russia had Turkey near their proximity to face nuclear threats so no colonizer stop justifying and acting like we foreigners haven't forgotten your colonialist history and propaganda as to delude us into taking your oligarchs sides
Literally you westerners are hypocrites here acting like your oligarchs didn't influence Ukraine and turn it into their puppet state, spare us foreigners your falsehoods colonizer as it's obvious Ukraine had their people already westernized by various political figures like Victoria Newland who btw were directly on Ukrainian lands influencing their people against Russia, regardless of what happened the west's influences are surely no lie and we foreigners surely do know as most of the world is westernized for your westerners to come enjoy our slave labour products and services in a cheaper value
don't delude us into believing that this is the cold war again and we need to take the sides of your colonial oligarchs, we would rather take no sides and call out western hypocrisy and kick out western influences and our people who are westernized as puppets for your oligarchs than support your colonial oligarchs again,
and yes hypocrite westerner Ukraine does have Nazis like the Germans had (another colonizer) and Russia although are colonialists themselves at least have a good reason to stop western influences from invading their lands again as they would stop their neighbours from being westernized again and turning Ukraine against them
"Fascist administration of Putin" 😂, please as if we foreigners don't see westerners as colonizers too, your people are worse than anything Putin has done, remember Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti, Guatemala Armenia, Cuba, Libya and various other countries in the list westerner? Or maybe you will feed us nonsensical western rhetorics as to have us believe your oligarchs were "saving" them, don't delude us into that cold war nonsense colonizer, the idea that Russia has some problems with racists isn't laughable colonizer, your people seem to forget how they treated migrants whom your oligarchs invaded their lands from,you forgot or it's just hypocrisy?
Finland, France, Denmark all these European countries are just colonialist nations for us foreigners obviously and we obviously know colonizers never learnt from their ancestors atrocities and carry on their legacy as colonialists, Finland and it's people are just dooming themselves and their future generations into another war cause their oligarchs can't stop being colonizers and continue their legacy as colonialists again never learning from their past
we don't give a crap about western rhetorics like right wing, left wing and other nonsensical rhetorics that western colonizers used in the cold war as to potray themselves as heroes of the world, this isn't the cold war westerner so don't delude us foreigners
Russia surely is a colonialist nation like your country westerner,we foreigners just view both of your sides as colonizers who invade others lands cause your oligarchs have the power to do so and steal their resources and lands from us foreigners, Israel is another colonialist nation so we foreigners don't even bother defending them let alone the Palestinians who themselves are paid by your western colonizers to go cause conflict cause western colonizers need their billions from the arms industry which you westerners hypocritically enjoy from, "specious", "fundamental", "disingenuous" all typical western rhetorics used to sound smart cause colonizers obviously will act all mighty and use such words cause they are the "saviors of the world"
Russia invading other countries surely doesn't solve anything but fight back against western colonialism which Russians are surely doing for their country, for us foreigners we would rather prefer countries like Ukraine never have gotten involved with your westerners in the first place let alone allow their lands for your oligarchs who obviously took all the advantages they have especially the oil and gas reserves in Ukraine which western colonizers obviously will exploit selling it at a cheaper value for you westerners to hypocritically enjoy the slave labour and blood oil from Ukrainians, Russia surely is colonialist but western Empire is much worse, Ukraine should have never even abandoned their nuclear capabilities but that would have also meant your westerners would have invaded their lands culturally and westernized their people like your oligarchs did with our countries
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@professorcheckmate well that's where the issue of your opinion has been around, the fact that you claim one system is bad while the other is lesser bad is just biased sorry, socialism hasn't worked in a country due to the fact that any country implementing such systems will lead to chaos not due to them being failures and more about the fact that people just can't see a successful system being applied, your making this all about being anti socialistic despite the fact i never even mentioning anything about socialism being bad, my point is that both systems needs to be understood and instead of just considering socialism as bad and not implementing any system at all maybe try to understand why people think socialism has benefits which weren't explored enough due to the fact that countries following such systems were often sanctioned by the west which directly pose a challenge to its capitalist ideas, I'm sorry but I'm not going to remain biased here and like with any system that requires criticisms doesn't mean they should be just taken in as a failure, especially when these systems were never applied on a country which has the sufficient economic wealth and technologically developed like the US was, Soviet Union failed in this due to the amounts of corruption that ensued which directly challenged the oligarchy system that it had in the past i.e the Tsarists who still had some wealth and contacts with Europe in the late 18th century, i seen enough criticisms about socialism which doesn't explain the flaws of it properly and all i get answers are they failed despite the fact that countries like Cuba were already considered a terrorist nation by the US even before communism was introduced there, the cold war was just the west using communism as a pretext to carry out and gain hegemony over the global market and they have been successful and all i see are comments like yours which doesn't offer any basis without western bias, there are already new hybridized system which is applied in Russia with its state resources being nationalized unlike the US which doesn't allow any government control and left entirely on private companies which make billions off fracking and various other unethical practices, you do make a point of how a socialist system is very vulnerable to corruption and it is obvious why as the wealth distribution isn't something that corporatists would prefer to be equally distributed, please don't confuse me with being capitalist as it has done enough damages already with various countries like South Korea with corporatists fueling the debt crisis among the youths or the countries from Global South and Africa in the past which had been run by private oil corporations like Shell or Exxon which had subsidized the oil from these nations leaving the government of those nations with almost lower resources for people to sustain, socialist countries like the Soviet Union were doomed from the start especially with leaders who recklessly carried on those ideals on sectors which were used to monarchy based understanding like Britain was in the past and also with the fact that there was a massive cold war which the west wanted to prevent any form of labour unions which actually looked to get rid of concentration of power into a few hands with all these factors the USSR was bound to fail, ironically the west in the 50s had better lifestyles which obviously was from the spoils of war created on foreign countries after the aftermath left by the British Empire and even if the systems were capitalist still allowed people sufficient resources as the wealth supply was significantly larger from cheap labour from foreign countries, and those times are now gone especially with the Empire not having enough monopoly now that foreign countries have nationalised their resources, modern times are more based on hybridized systems which take in different aspects of each system and no matter which system is applied any system even capitalism or communism will be bound to fail if they do not have enough connections with the rest of the world in terms of technology or resources and now those failures are used as a pretext for people to base a system as a failure instead of seeing which aspects of those systems would work for the people
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeremydevor7004 wow so you westerners will bring up your media and judge how history of foreign nations is ? Please I'm neither from the US or Russia here and the way i see it the west is the aggressor here expanding its influence everywhere across the globe, i mean how can any foreigner believe anything you westerners say if the history of the west has been living off the poor especially in the 50s where westerners enjoyed all the prestiges as much as they could, you claim me as supporting a lesser evil than a true evil yet it's obvious this is nothing but geopolitics at play, western propaganda has obviously worked with them sugarcoating their actions across the globe and claiming how Russia or China has been the aggressor and now you westerners come claiming as if foreigners are programmed ? Please maybe stop that bias as all you are doing is fueling the fires of war which your oligarchs had created and still can't leave foreign nations alone, the fact of the matter is Russia is sanctioned by the US and it's people are suffering due to the sanctions and here you come claiming how Russia is evil and instead of setting aside differences and negotiate for once you westerners will still keep that animosity towards Russia and it's progress, let's be real the west has been living off the spoils of war for too long and it's time it's people and oligarchs ruling them come crashing down if they continue to be antagonistic towards foreign nations, this lesser evil crap is overdone and people would rather set aside differences instead of continuing to call each other evil as it's obvious everyones hands is stained with blood, but i guess you westerners obviously don't want to let go and still "support" Ukraine despite the obvious facts, this cold war which continues from the old century mentalist ideals that you westerners can't let go off and other countries forced to take drastic actions to defend their own territory just shows the exceptionalism that westerners have and this will only be their downfall for good, you claim im a monster yet can't even look at the oligarchs you support, and the fact that you are complicit in fueling this war just like everyone in this war, love how these facts still doesn't change the fact that the west still has its military across the globe and i bet you would still come up with some justification like you westerners always did with 9/11 but I guess being disingenuous does work especially with western propaganda at display, love how you claim that people need to be deprogrammed as if they can't see through the reality of the situation, but i guess it does seem convenient, the fact that you bring up western sources to back up anything you westerners say just looses any trust people would have as it's obvious western propaganda has been built upon the foundations of lie and deceit towards the people, even if these countries have propoganda as you claim declaring them as enemies does nothing but ruin the lives of the people who want nothing from this war, whichever war crimes committed by people will come up eventually and be noticed in history as is the nature of war but instead of ending it for good and setting aside differences for our future generations to survive, the west would rather plunge itself deep into chaos out of conserving its own Empire at the expense of its own citizens
1
-
@zhivago6 well ridiculous idea? Please which nation in this world has the largest amount of military bases installed throughout? Please it's obvious NATO is still expanding its military bases and conducting proxy wars throughout the globe and Russia is stuck with foreign nations which have previously had better relations with countries like Ukraine continue to get rid of ethnic Russians population which were left behind after the Soviet Union collapse, Ukraine was directly allowing western western intervention in the 2000s with multiple organisations like NED (national endowment for democracy) and various other pro western organizations around the world, this slow burn from Ukraine which continued to cut relations with Russia in 2014 after it's democratically elected leader was ousted in the maidan coup lead by pro western political parties especially with Victoria Newland playing a huge part and her conversations of Ukraine's elected leader being leaked proves it and relations being strained especially when Syria and other middle Eastern countries which had better ties with Russia as a bridge for Euro-Russian relations which is sabotaged by the US as well the US does not want any superpowers to have equal prominence as itself, this war is something that the US does not want any foreign countries like China or Russia having equal footing as them and you are just talking out of emotions not seeing the slow burn which was there in Ukraine even before this conflict began years ago with Ukraine and Ukraine literally had Neo Nazis like Stephen Bandera in the past who supported Nazi Germany against Russia in WW2 and his followers who are Banderites continue to be a part of the armed forces in Ukraine,you claim Russia carrying out mass murder of civilians yet don't seem to mention anything about the atrocities committed by your own nation in the past and how Ukraine ousted any pro Russian supporters and caused a civil war to the point where pro Russian supporters had separated themselves from Ukraine in the Donbass region, you have been taking sources from western media which obviously will show Ukraine being a victim in this war yet not mentioning anything about Ukraine's Neo Nazis which are still fighting the war and then being right next to Russian borders which clearly doesn't give Russia any room for their military or control over their borders, you claim any wars can be justified by flimsy reasoning yet i ask your same question to you too, China hasn't invaded Phillipines for the same reason they are already having problems with Taiwan especially when the US military is right next to their waters and not mentioning anything about the fact that Phillipines has maintained better relations with China compared to Ukraine which it's government had already started censorship via removing the Russian language in schools and institutions throughout Ukraine and the fact that bombings in Donbass aren't mentioned and Russia's multiple warnings which the US ignored on purpose or westerners not even bothering to see it let alone lecture others about invasion, It's obvious you would use words like critical thinking as if for people to forget the main objectives behind these wars and how they were caused in the first place and this game of geopolitics which westerners constantly try to forget yet are loud and complain about how foreign nations like Russia or China are imperialistic while forgetting about how the west invaded the middle East and in South America and Africa, please it's obvious NATO would not attack Russia as all they will be asking is mutual destruction from nuclear war which we all know how it ends, and now please don't claim these are all Russian propaganda as it is obvious which nation is at the top with its military bases compared that to China or Russia which are cornered in their own borders and get lectured by westerners while hiding their hypocrisy, no nation is waging wars on purpose other than the US and Russia has nothing to gain from this other than lose its trade partners in Europe which EU continued to cut relations with Russia and sabotaging them again like they did with the cold war which you westerners obviously forget as history books will sugarcoat any actions taken by the US Empire, even if you claim Russia is evil doesn't mean the west needs to supply weapons to Ukraine especially to Neo Nazis which in the past have committed various atrocities towards Russian ethnics and Russo-Ukrainians threatening their culture and way of life and instead of negotiations we are seeing more economic sanctions against the people of Russia instead of going after the oligarchs which worsens the lives of people and forcibly drags them to this war, but it's obvious in this game of geopolitics the west could care less especially when they have already done enough damages to the middle East and South America and various other continents yet you westerners never will mention anything about that and not see how your oligarchs continue to sabotage foreign nations and interfere in their affairs for their own agenda
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeremydevor7004 i mean hell im sure many of things about countries you mentioned probably must have been from mainstream media alright? So how can you be sure of anything really? It's obvious that westerners will use this as a pretext to justify their actions on the world instead of staying away from other countries affairs altogether which obviously has been the case throughout history, claims of countries having dictatorship yet the country is progressing sounds contradictory especially when people would rather see their country progress and their lives away from poverty which nations have shown significant progress overall, let's just say about the Iran situation where Sharia law has suppressed women, yes it is understandable that it is unethical but it does not mean the west needs to interfere with their policies especially when it's obvious it shown how disastrous it is, the same people i.e Taliban whom the west were supporting in the 70s against Russia now are deemed terrorists for western convenience and justifying the war on terror despite being the west's fault, or invading iraq for the sake of removing a dictatorship like Saddam Hussein yet can't do the same thing with Saudi Arabia which is a dictatorship itself, please the double standards for the definition of dictatorship is warped here, if a country has issues with human rights the people of those nations should be the one to bring that change and not with western interference here especially when it's obvious how much economical harm it will cause to the US if it stops it's wars as it provides the blood oil that you enjoy surely, the people of those nations should be able to eventually understand their needs and what they will find better especially when foreign interference only shows to be a disaster especially with corporate practices involved on peoples resources and the old cultural and socio-economic model they had and which they benefitted from is ruined by western meddling, your definition of dictatorship is based on western media which obviously should not be a source of reason especially when you don't even visit the nations themselves and see the fact itself, I'm in no way supporting any form of suppression but if ideas which are meant to cause economical and social harm to the people are freely allowed then it is a issue too, and if nations have unethical practices continuing doesn't mean western countries should interfere this destroying the countries cultural and socio-economic development, people in modern times have ideas which are positive and some will eventually look to improve peoples lives as it is an innate feeling that will eventually come up especially with human nature
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@junjunsnow1139 that first statement which you claimed about power shifts i feel is a huge issue, i mean people like Biden only have been in the office for less than a year and look at the damages he's done, i believe people who are incompetent towards the people of a nation should never get any tenures and the way that the US Empire system works is basically a trial and error system where people will choose their leaders who manipulate them with promises and do the opposite and in all that time cause chaos and exploitation as much as possible, i do agree on the power shifts but really in the wrong hands especially corporatists it's only chaotic and many are powerless towards this no matter what system they implement, i mean these people who are powerful carry out all kinds of dirty tricks and manipulation and some even have understood the behavioural patterns of people accurately, if I'm honest it will really be a naive thinking such a system will not face any form of corruption especially when good people will slip up at some point and those cracks are something that people in power will take advantage off especially in this world where people themselves are selfish and self centred instead of maybe thinking about everyones well being, i didn't mean that a person should always stay in power for long, but the fact that the wrong side will gain ground is the issue here, i mean it's a cycle of good fighting the bad and this cycle is something that would be chaotic i say, i mean like you said we could either pray the leader does not turn out to be a scumbag and this trial and error process which the US government has continued is only causing more chaos while the real people in power are running the show as to benefit themselves in the end, i mean people in history overall have learnt to be in suffering and will accept anything nowadays like a toxic relationship and this is what I'm seeing with the US Empire, honestly in history suffering is something that will be there and people will make decisions which will be beyond others to change but at least we can try mitigating things as much as possible as people in the end overall do share a common goal as to survive and have better lives and this is something that could be taken advantage off or used for good
1
-
@junjunsnow1139 the way i see it any system will have people at the top even communism and even if people think that they will get replaced the power they held at that time does cause enough damages if say some rogue elements pop up, i mean in any system there has to be someone who would have to be leading the cultural and social economic ideas that people share, it was the basis for any system even kings have to lead their people at some point or say kings who will be replaced i.e a tenure, let's just say we bring the change yet we do have to choose people who will speak for us in this case the second thought channel which is implementing these ideas, i mean he talks about being against western interests yet he's also against Russia or China for their systems which he claims to be capitalist which makes it hard to take him seriously especially when China and Russia companies are state owned and they usually have nationalized their resources and adopted a hybridized system based on communism and capitalism i believe, communism does create more middle classes yet does not allow people to progress into upper classes as those people running the system well would want to preserve their status, overall there should be a proper scientific and research based understanding without any bias from sources for systems like these to be implemented properly, the west has been basing it's system to be at the top and even if it was communist it still would cause wars and prevent any competitors from gaining equal position or surpass the US, i feel that system implementation in current times is secondary especially when countries are having this cold war which they will use these ideologies to create wars and admittedly the USSR did play a part in, the reality is any system with power will do anything to preserve it even if it's equally distributed among the people, i mean there comes a point where people will run out of resources too and who do you think they will go after then, overall my basis is the west should stop interference in foreign countries affairs for good and leave nations to sustain for themselves as they rather not be controlled by another nation like with the British Empire, systems like capitalism or communism or any other systems needs to be well researched and learnt about (in case of communism how long can a elected leader can enjoy material wealth or continue that position as they will have to be replaced and wealth redistributed) instead of just accepting it recklessly as i believe any system even communism implemented without proper understanding does lead to chaos, as like with a riot which goes around there will be people looking for malicious intent too in that chaos trying to take advantage off people as much as possible
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@juliankraus1011 1. Alright we will talk about the 80s Afghanistan war which the west interfered in
2.well it does look like you are defending western intervention especially when talking about how just because Russia invaded Afghanistan so the west is the world police and has intervened in return
3.well you talk as if it was the only way it would have happened despite the fact that the west really didn't need to intervene in these conflicts, so maybe not sugarcoat it please
4.you talk as if the west didn't have anything to do with the conflict beforehand and that the west never had any contacts with the Mujahideen as to justify the Soviet invasion, either way regardless of historical "facts" it is obvious for us foreigners that the west and the Soviets were surely involved in the political disputes in Afghanistan even before the Soviet invasion, otherwise your painting this picture of the Soviets being the villians who invaded a foreign country and the west had no hand in Afghanistan's internal affairs which we know those "facts" would never be disclosed
as we already know in the past how the west has toppled governments and installed client regimes by backing the opposition party in a country's political affairs which still this practice continues in Haiti and other countries in the global South
5. Please we know it's all a lie especially when western forces were covertly involved in these conflicts and the same with the Soviets which these superpowers obviously will withhold information about it, please don't try to convince us foreigners about "facts" which already has been proven throughout history to be false, it has been documented the west from time to time intervened in global politics for its own interests (like replacing Guantemala's president with a fascist regime or US backed coup in Bolivia and many other regions across the world, even in Ukraine where the current president Zelensky has shown to have multiple shares in Wall Street and had western democrats like Victoria Newland directly backing the opposition party Zelensky worked under or say the wests successful coup in Haiti and the endless list goes on) as to secure as many countries under its faction and with NATO expansion of every country which seemingly "choose" to join western powers it is obvious for us who's the enemy here, so this claim of the only foreign troops being the Mujahideen who were obviously backed by covert western factions and mercenary groups which the west hires like Blackwater which got involved in Iraq so it's not safe to assume the west would obviously use such methods as to ascertain the Mujahideens victory, so please don't just pretend we foreigners don't know anything about this wars history especially when the history told by you and the western Empire you defend is obviously false all written by victors of a war
6. You call me building up a strawman yet you come here bringing western "facts" which are obviously warped as to convince others how right the west was at that time, we all know by this point what the west and it's oligarchs are committing themselves to and it's high time the west and other factions like Russia and China never will continue to interfere in global politics as countries have already taken strict measures to avoid foreign meddling like how it happened in the past, but hey i guess your western counterparts will find a way to destabilize other smaller nations, Ukraine was surely successful as it was already doomed since the western intervention in the dissolution of the USSR, the west and all these other factions are surely involving other countries who would rather isolate themselves away from their senseless wars and putting this narrative as there being only one enemy seems very convenient for the west obviously
i even wonder whether you are even from the global South my friend cause it surely doesn't look like an average citizen from any of the countries of the global South would agree with foreign interference in their countries in the first place especially since the Spanish or Portuguese invaded their countries
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@costinhalaicu2746 well I may try to take some steps to avoid that but it would surely be flawed in many and it may be doubtful for even newer countries which may be doomed but it would be worth a try or maybe not
1. Smaller countries would have to cut themselves off from the west completely and look to sustain themselves economically via nationalizing their resources instead of relying on the world trade or the open market (which we know would be devastating for the people in the small country but honestly I would see no option to guarantee freedom), about the knowledge of nuclear weapons countries like Iran had already taken steps to ensure they would have had maintained relations with other fellow superpowers so smaller countries could try something similar and may try to gain knowledge of nuclear power via third parties ( I know the steps which will be required will be hard if not impossible but smaller countries in the past had managed to gain access to nuclear technology before like Iran from the Soviets so it may be worth a shot for countries to try something similar with China but even that's doubtful as China would obviously want something in return and probably would be even worse dealing with them than the west ), about military intervention like I said so the above steps must be taken as soon as possible or in the past should have taken steps so if your like a new country which wants to stave off western hegemony then ur kinda doomed as really you could do nothing about countries which are hellbent on making your resources free for everyone, really Ukraine in the past actually could have been free by not giving up any nuclear weaponry they possessed from the Soviets, that way they could have actually ensured no invasion whether from the west or the Soviets could have taken place
I do agree the steps here would be flawed and if not impossible to pull off but if done so then countries could have guaranteed their own self preservation
2. Second part really I can't refute other than trying to cut off your country from the rest of the world but we already seen from North Korea as an example of how devastating that could be and the irony is that a country like North Korea is run by corrupt leaders with selfish interests who only put their own people under the bus as the rich would rather enjoy with the remaining wealth with what they have than ever provide for their own people, so there really wouldn't be any feasible solutions for this for sure unless your nation would have to end up giving something else in return for power and in fact may be worse dealing with countries which wouldn't be as "kind" as the west, not to mention the west really has their eyes and influences everywhere across the globe and your point about corruption is also true enough that even an attempt of wanting to gain access to nukes would be quickly shut down by the west as justification of terrorism not to mention their propaganda which works really well towards westerners who will believe everything anyway as long as they get fed enough, the west really engineered plans to avoid countries from being self sufficient enough with the steps you mentioned about corruption or foreign interference all these factors can lead countries trying to hey away from foreign hegemony into destabilization
Final point I do agree with many of the statements as the west has just too much power and influence for them to ever allow other self sufficient countries to be free from influences or doing better than their people, especially when it's not just the west and other countries are also wanting the same thing to not allow any other nations being prosperous, a bunch of power hungry maniacs running these superpower nations who wouldn't even allow other countries to have their own autonomy or self sufficiency for their peoples sake and won't even improve their own country as they rather would want no country to have control of their own resources, maybe countries could have taken steps to avoid western hegemony and other foreign forces especially in the 50-60s where they could have had the time gap to gain access to nukes but that time is gone sadly with the UN i.e US Nations using the fear of nukes and basically getting rid of any form of resistance countries could have shown against foreign invaders
1
-
1
-
1
-
@costinhalaicu2746 well about these topics really here's the thing, my country has a different history from whatever history your country went through and as far as our country is concerned we are very anti western and for very good reasons and although the west may have done some positives the negatives like our culture being completely desecrated and warped in convenience for the west and not to mention our country being lead by corrupt leaders whom the west continues to support and endorse them, all these factors is what leads to us being anti western in the first place, idk about your country and whether it was in the Soviet era which we foreigners don't have any knowledge about, regardless of what your countrys people think for us the west has been a negative influence and we would rather want the west gone along with other Empires, and whatever history your people are exposed to for us all these countries like Iran Russia or the west including the US are the enemies really, all foreigners have done in our nation is replace and warp our culture into unrecognisable things and is why we have such contempt against any nation, so don't be mistaken into believing I would support any country even the west for us is our enemy and any other countries support their regime, same goes with China or other superpowers, about Iran and other countries you claim from what we understood is that they are no different than the west at least for my country people and we wouldn't want to get involved in any of their histories let alone the west whom we wish give back all they stole from our lands instead of living off our wealths, but sadly the people in my country are just too stuck up worshiping westerners as saviors yet never see them as the colonizers they are
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@costinhalaicu2746 please westerner don't delude us with western facts and claim sympathy for European countries, in fact the country you mentioned Poland had allied with the west many times against Russia and has allied with many other European powers in the colonial era, we foreigners aren't deluded to just believe that some countries in Europe are innocent despite the fact that those countries had allied with NATO in their expansion, it would be naive for us to not consider European nations as not sharing colonial ties
same goes with every other nations in the past and the only nations which we could sympathize with are nations which were essentially colonial outposts for colonizers like many Asian countries or many of the global South or many African nations which are still colonial outposts for the west and for China
please don't try to bring up alternative historical facts as to ascertain us foreigners about how colonialism worked especially when it was broadly understood by countries across the globe that the western world had and still was better developed than the rest of the world, even China which was a colonial power in the past never expanded beyond their borders unlike western powers like Europe and Russian Empire from the Tsar Era which expanded to many different continents and continued their colonial expansion and although it could be argued Empires from foreign lands were colonial too they never did expand beyond their lands as much as the west had done, every country has their history written with blood but knowing human history it was never as peaceful as people expect, but what's different from today and in modern times is that countries are no longer in control over their systems, like the Mayans whose descendants i.e Mexicans, Guatemala and other central American countries were colonised by the Spanish and now the US and even if their history was violent there were multiple revolutions and coups as to leave their culture unchanged, but with the western world monotonizing their culture and essentially alienating the newer generation from the history of their countries and in turn worshipping the west which in turn discriminate against them only as long as they don't follow their western ideals, it is making things obvious that times are changed for the worse now that countries are essentially becoming the same as the west with selective ways of running their country all in convenience for the west to monopolize their resources for their self interests
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@xuto2693 well the reality is the fact that the capitalist system only benefited the few and the so called positives that people had from capitalism were from at the expense of other countries which were suffering from imperialism and former colonialism i.e the people in the US and European countries used globalisation as a way for their companies to be placed on foreign nations where they will have their monopoly over the natural resources of those nations and if those nations fight back in this case the global south you get the cartel and right wing puppets from those respective countries who basically loot their own country and its people and live in the west, westerners have lived their lives thinking their system is perfect and works yet never questioned how they get resources in the first place and how much do they get and whether there's a limit to how much they can earn, you get these multi-billion dollar oligarchs which some of them ironically were ordinary people who sometimes don't even know how to spend their money when they grew old or if their offsprings and future generations even managed that wealth or blew it all up on materialistic pleasure, there's also the fact that western culture overall does not look on a scientific understanding and basis for what's right and doesn't seek to improve its culture, look at those auctions and how people buy up things which are extremely expensive but have no actual value to its use and only is present as to showcase their egos something that even we ordinary people have at some point like owning something which has no materialistic value but only is expensive in name sake and some people held onto it as to even risk their own assets financially and social relations being ruined due to debts or other things, it's this reckless spending on things and demand which we continually ask for which we do not have any proper understanding of whether it's required or not or even in modern culture the fact that we only selectively think about one thing while not bothering with the other or finding any relations to how the issue could b solved is why those who are privileged aren't taught to be humble and have a proper understanding of whats is required and what isn't, we should first look to improve ourselves first instead of improving the system which is an innate fault of our own way of life, any country can work under a system correctly if they are provided with enough ample resources, manpower and time to understand implementation and remaining skeptical, but modern times have demanded the need of a few benefits the many which is itself inherently flawed as the many will fight back and they are surely doing, even from a corporatist standpoint the practitioner would not think to cause conflict on its own consumer base, and capitalism also encourages unethical practices on putting a price tag on things even on people like with the healthcare system which is notorious on this one, capitalism is a system which is designed for the needs of the people in the sense of their materialistic needs and pleasure and not like from a survivalistic needs i.e to stay alive, under a capitalist system you could own anything as long as you got enough money but also the reality is many people buy things which on the long run do not benefit i.e owning a sports car not considering the maintenance and demand to buy newer version which also planned obsolescence comes into play i.e reducing the products functionality which if done without obsolescence would have been miles better than just distributing nerfed versions of the product, it's also noted that compared to capitalism which has the resources distribution in the hands of the people who have the potential to become an oligarch and not have affiliations to the state, communism has the wealth distribution under a single company i.e the state which eliminates other people who try to gain power which could be seen as a good thing depending upon subjectivity i.e whether other people can have a monopoly over the rest or everyone to be under the same monopoly under the state which people or other oligarchs are at the complete mercy of the state, the issue is the fact that people rather prefer having an opportunity to have a monopoly over others or remain independent i.e stay rich and not be touched by the state, people got to look from a individualistic perspective and in this case a person who seeks to be rich could have the potential to help or ruin other peoples lives, same thing with the state which the people running it can decide whether to help their people or hoard all that wealth for themselves, the reality is that if you take into account all the people in this world i.e nearly 8 billion it would not be enough for all the people in the world to have the same average life i.e middle class and some will have to fall under poverty for the others to survive especially when you take into account how we use resources and what we use it for and also the fact that many will want to live the same lavish lifestyle as others, the issue is the fact that we in modern times are still scientifically deprived and could have achieved much more if the imperialistic in the past decided to actually set aside their differences and actually look to help develop poor nations scientifically and technologically instead of having this disparity where the poor breed like rats understandably to survive,the reality is that conflicts make money as the balance of power and control that people have off their resources gets shifted and in that orderly chaos oligarchs find the opportunity to slowly surplus all that wealth, capitalism also has ties with western culture overall and how they live their lives and many of our lifestyles still haven't changed from the way we lived half a decade, yes technology is developed but still the overall lifestyle is largely the same and this stagnancy is only killing the west and also dragging the rest of the world and the same system which never was revised or even thought of adding some socialist elements which would benefit the people and in turn them is never implemented, it is obvious that in any system we people will have leader whom we choose to oversee as people can't be like the wild west i.e every person on their own and the people are at the mercy of their leaders whether they choose to do good or bad and benefit themselves
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sourdough6490 your last point about insistence on building socialism in an agrarian country is literally just dismissal of the fact that in developed countries, socialism was met with fascism like the video you see there, you seem to use the argument of socialism in all countries and claim that the Soviets should have kept waiting for the Germans and other Scandinavian countries to be successful in their socialist revolution, but the reality was far from what was idealised and only the Soviets went ahead with building socialism in one country as Marxism still never had a true answer towards Fascism
Expecting socialism to be developed on advanced countries is still a pipe dream which socialists still fail to understand as Fascism at those times in every country crushed any serious revolutionary potential that was carried, ask the Paris commune how their revolution went and the German revolution too, they were met with fascists who completely dismantled their organisation all because they never built up any serious organisation and a sufficient military force or created any dictatorship of the Proliteriat to enact these forces
Lenin and the Soviets were successful as they had developed a proper organisation which was harsh enough to combat Fascism which was exactly the solution back then and the same thing done by Stalin who implemented the teachings of Lenin into practice,Fascism crushed any serious Marxist movement and still does to this day put out any working class movement, and making concessions with the bourgeois never ended well for the revolutionaries and even small scale attacks towards the bourgeois is pointless especially when the bourgeois has always had enough military power to put them down too
The Soviets had a stricter police force and anti capitalist ideology as they understood that any form of monopoly created by opportunists within the working class itself has in the past led to many socialist states collapsing like with Vietnam which turned revisionist after Ho Chi Minh died
but even then their policies towards those arrested was not nearly close to being as worse as the US Empire which still to this day employs prison labour with no benefits, insufficient healthcare as prisoners usually die of curable diseases and serious gang violence within the prisons themselves which is encouraged by law enforcement within as to justify harsher sentences while for the Soviets the so called "Gulags" the sentencing did not even last 10-20 years and only worst offenders of the state actually got serious sentences and all the while they received free healthcare, education systems being employed and other stuff which never gets mentioned in the "horrors of the Gulags"
The Soviets only had poorer conditions in the Gulags during the times of the famine or during ww2 where there was serious food shortages and thousands of prisoners died cause of it which these separate incidents are obviously propagandized to make the Soviets obviously look like the boogeyman, sure there were some serious flaws within the Soviet policing systems but considering the situations they were in and then claiming they should be held completely accountable for circumstances beyond their control is just false rhetoric used by the capitalists obviously to demonize any socialist states from the past
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alicec6459 if I'm honest overall it's more about the fact that people are separated by cultural and social differences with each nations, i don't like the Sharia law in Iran and restrictions put on women but that politics is used as a guise to invade foreign nations and I see this tactic applied everywhere almost and in history throughout, yes cultural differences are something that will be there but instead of trying to understand all the aspects and analysis of that culture we just don't accept it overall and wage war like we did with Iraq or Afghanistan or other middle Eastern countries, i mean if those countries have flaws which harm their populace the people of those nations are the ones to change their culture not foreign powers who have no proper understanding of that culture, but we still waged a war anyways and the people gained nothing but their nations in turmoil in a worse situation than before, let's be real people in modern times when it comes to survival aren't going to associate themselves with culture or ideology or any sorts of ideas, many just want their economic condition to be better as possible and culture comes secondary here, and this financial war is something that is the main crux here which countries are trying to get a hold of, people are controlled in the sense that those who never think out of their heads or incentivised to think about controversial topics are used for their voices as to carry out actions which benefits the rich and those who are smart enough to understand or maybe remain critical are censored off social media and their voices clouded under the voices of the illiterate masses, like with the Ukraine war which those who are smart and know about rising Nazism never talk about it as doing so will either get their position they enjoy in life stripped or censored if they talk about it, modern times don't live for expressing ideas which even if controversial are discussed regardless and they only live for convenience and fear of losing that position
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@majeedp8760 well you are talking about regime change which at this point in time where nuclear escalation is at a all time high and yes i do know about Sharia law and all other middle Eastern countries are usually monotonous on that idealogy, but your approach of trading one demon for another which actually looks to erase your culture altogether isn't something that is ideal here, look at what happened to Iraq and with the pretext of Saddam Husseins regime the US government destabilized the entire country will millions dead and their culture permanently damaged especially with the US invasion of Iraq or Afghanistan is another example with culture clashes leading to the country now led by the Taliban which despite claims of giving equal rights is still following the same Sharia law, also foreign countries do not want western culture either as the culture clearly had multiple flaws and the scare of radical feminism also does not help them either but there are positives too but foreign countries can't risk suffering the same radicalization, and tell me is it really worth risking your country for another demon which basically looks to exploit your nation? Especially when the power vacuum left behind will just be filled by another dictatorship, whatever happened to the people and women in Iraq face is unfortunate but willing to gamble your nation for another corporatist is just as worse especially when you risk your culture being completely erased even the positives that Iranians wish to present to the world, culture clashes are something that will happen in history but modern times are geared towards resources more than culture and some really powerful people will do anything even erase their culture and every identity about them just to gain access to their resources, Syria is another example with how its oil is stolen by the US without any legal consequences and about Canada the times were as recent as the 90s and even still today the indigenous have the potential to face something similar especially with right wing groups and Nazism increasing in large numbers in Canada and other western countries so your quite naive on thinking your western friends will help them, whatever culture each respective countries carry doesn't mean their entire country should be at risk for war, i mean have you even seen how the US military treated Iraqis in the invasion? You are only fed sugarcoated versions of the events which probably will never be fully disclosed especially with the massive censorship that the west is notorious for, Iran faces persecution and any culture revisions are something that should be carried out by the people of that nation instead of foreign interference which the rest of the world has had enough especially when everyone at this point knows how that will end up for the nation being invaded, culture change comes from proper understanding and compromises between both sides instead of outright waging war against each other which does nothing but harm your culture and the younger generation which doesn't want anymore conflicts, you think it was fine for that 16yo kid to burn her hijab and only anger the old traditions which many still follow in Iran and instead of trying to have peaceful protests which does not involve cultural harm or use of weapons or anything which leads to both sides attacking each other, that kid was involved in something big and it's unfortunate extremism took over and many are angry at western interference in their culture, the point I'm trying to make is that we the average citizens don't get to choose between both leftist and right wing ideals correctly and either approach towards their extremes instead of trying to be in the middle and create a sufficient balance which benefits everyone regardless of sex, race or ethnicity, but now we are divided with identity politics by corporatism which only seeks for resources as to subjugate control over the people even if it means erasing their culture and way of life, we should have a pragmatic and emotional understanding of cultures and you can't just change a culture overnight it takes decades for people to come to terms of their traditions being challenged and they usually are afraid their entire culture will be at risk which isn't the case but they don't like to take risks, we should be more humanizing instead of having the same aggressive approach which only causes misery to families and children throughout generations
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@motherlandbot6837 well i didn't make comparisons between East Asian countries and the industrial revolution which was one of the worse times for the poor overall, East Asian countries progress overall is much better than compared to industrial revolution but still there were labour issues in China which is acknowledged by China overall especially during the 70s where devastating famines occurred and since then they have learnt from the mistakes that the west committed in the industrial revolution, they have even acknowledged those periods as the century of humiliation and since then drastically improved the lives of millions of Chinese people since the 2000s, labour laws were surely much better than in the 1900s but still a large amount of cracks followed even in that system which was largely controlled by the west, another example I'll make is the issue of slave labour of Indians in Dubai where they were given promises of better housing and welfare overall but stuck in poor living conditions and worse with crippling debt which piled up for the expenses to even enter the country, China since then has been self reliant and many of their companies are state owned instead of relying on foreign companies like Apple, Samsung and other tech companies and in other sectors they have done the same throughout, these are factors that needs to be acknowledged of the fact that most of these nations still were suffering from post colonial effects where power vacuums were filled by western proxies from those nations selected by the west and large numbers of corruption started continuing in those nations, China and Russia even acknowledge this in fact and they have improved things since then, if you think I'm just spreading western propaganda i can't help then, im overall sceptical on all nations and how they carry out their progress and their history without any biases, the fact of the matter is many of the nation's progress isn't without struggle and it is something that needs to be acknowledged and other factors like corruption needs to be brought up instead of having a subjective opinion and biases, the current system of these countries are something that needs to be acknowledged and how they approach on these matters whether it benefits the populace of those nations or exploited should be brought up, eg: i don't fully agree with China's system of censorship and surveillance even if it brings safety to the people with less crime and terrorism and also preventing western influences which are known to have its populace against the nation but with full control over the people who it is still seen as a demonising move by westerners who also are sceptical of their own country like the US which is famous for censorship too, Russia's approach on this war is something that is also seen as demonising by westerners even if it shows their western hypocrisy like with the Iraq invasion which they fully supported and many people who have a neutral stance on this like India or other nations like Hungary still do think this war could have been avoided if west stayed away from Ukraine and other Baltic states overall instead of Russia making compromising choices with the war and having no choice but to get dragged alongside to fight off NATO expansion and i also mentioned about Nicaragua's approach on censorship which you didn't fully read and even if their approach is to avoid small scale influences from the west which western countries have done in the past destabilizing nations by influencing them it will still be seen as a demonising move by the average person, every country in this world will have flaws and positives which needs to be addressed instead of having one sided arguments which in fact just gives proof for westerners to believe the countries as bad and more reason to recklessly pick the side waging war against other nations without having both sides perspectives and choosing the one which benefits them, i rather see people who would have criticism towards all sides and addressing their flaws and taking their positives into account too instead of one dimensional black and white biased thinking, in the end this is a battle between the rich and the average person dragged into these wars which some don't want to not have any part of and only want peace and to prevent any escalation into a nuclear war
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well the cartels never got rich out of nowhere you know, many of them work under corporate legitimate businesses who carry out their supplies and import-exports and many have had ties with western companies and corporate lobbyists working with the US government, even the drugs do not originate from the US and literally grown from the global south under the cartel and sent illegally or bribery from those countries respective governments as there's large scale corruption with those who look to make money in a poor country, the US literally seizes and steals resources from poor nations by seizing drugs and money under the pretext of war on drugs and taking up millions of dollars worth of cocaina leaves which should be returned back to the countries where it originated but i guess they just resupply all the drugs back to poorer communities in their own states allowing corporatists to run their Empires and catch them again for more money, literally stealing from their own people and people wonder why the US is seen as this evil, the agricultural lands of those poor nations are taken over by the cartel and the government those who are good and want to put an end to all of this have virtually no power in trying to stop their lands from being ruined, also added the fact that even the people are powerless against the cartel as seen by the massacres they carry out, really the good people have no choice but to run with it while their lands are occupied by money makers who themselves are backstabbed by the west who gain from a lot, i mean the DEA literally earns more than the expenditure that they get funded and many there are corrupt too and even those who are good unknowingly carry out violence on people i.e the cartel who are meant to be betrayed by the US as a scapegoat, it's not surprising the west gets involved into proxy wars and resources grabbing as they did the same thing with the mafia, the mafia, cartel and other organisations are nothing more than disposable tools for the corporatists who use them as scapegoats for them to loot from the people and destabilize foreign countries as much as possible, i mean look at what Nicaragua and other countries which were strucken by the war on drugs have to do especially with after getting rid of western media or influence via censorship which arguably even if controversial led to less intervention from the western media and culture influences which is the same thing China is doing but now stuck to it for other arguments which are controversial too, the case is Nicaragua now has to deal with the remaining drugs and the cartel that was left behind by western interferences and now either has to stick around to sustain its own citizens via the drug trade which westerners find a reason to claim the nation is a authoritarian regime yet can't see the fact that they got all the remaining drugs which was left behind by the cartel and now the way these drugs will be used is something that Nicaragua could decide whether for good or bad as it would seek to get rid of all of it and also the cartel as they will surely seek to monopolise as western powers left the global south and the country should seek for better control over it's agricultural lands which formerly were taken over for drug production, honestly the west all it managed to do is ruin the agricultural lands of the global south and even Mexico which it did the most damages towards all in an attempt to gain money and possession of drugs which were meant to be returned to the global south, the way i see it drugs production is environmentally destroying the lands as only a single crop is grown with no diversity causing massive food shortages for the people which they now need to take control over their lands, really the global south did better in getting rid of western influences for good and get rid of imperialism and should have more control over its land and do better to improve the lives of its people and control the leftover mess left by the west or proxy cartel, in this case better research needs to be done to avoid such corruption and provocation for good
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrispercival9789 are you even hearing yourself ? Just because you have the ability to talk about things doesn't mean you get to enact your ideas on them successfully, especially when a lot of white noise and controversies are created like the so called sexual assaults allegations against Julian Assange which almost completely shifted the narrative about the wikileaks and many working in the site were under scrutiny of it later on as to hamper their operations
A fair trial ? Are you serious? You really think the US corporate lobbyists will ever allow Assange to be free especially after exposing many secrets about world leaders internationally and causing billions in damages and same thing with Snowden who would have zero chances seeing the light of the day especially with so called military secrets which in another word is just imperialistic plans being exposed, it's honestly laughable with how you claim they will ever get a legal trial as if in the US things are legal, this is the same country in the past which was imperialistic and carried out nuclear tests on sovereign countries and despite media coverage was forgotten by the rest of the world till the internet, no amount of media coverage means that they will get what they want and again it's embarrassing when you claim the west has more freedom which is just given to us for name sake as to not get enough backlash for censorship
You are naive thinking that there will be no elites in power in any country, it is known the west does the same thing that you claim CCP dictatorships do using the war on terror as a justification to invade sovereign nations, you westerners just don't want to see China at the top or even it's people successes being ruined by foreign intervention which is obviously the case, you call me CCP apologist being a complete infantile person throwing words at me but can't vene realise the fact that despite all the claims you make the US still has GDP and military bases around the world higher than China does, the people are already aware of the dictatorship you claim which carries out censorship and like i said you don't even bother to debate between the topic of censorship in China which i said many countries have the same approach like Nicaragua and Cuba recently but understandable reasons as to avoid western influences in their country especially among the youth who are the main target, but having this childish and aggressive approach is going to get you nowhere and even justifying the so called freedom of speech which the US has is just halfassed for the sake of not creating a revolution which is already happening wouldn't sit well with people especially the rest of the world which knows in the past the same nation talking about freedom and everything used to enslave many countries and still does in the past and these anti China rhetoric which you make is only appearing as an attack on the Chinese people like how it was with Russia when westerners started attacking Russian people for supporting Putin, instead of calling me names why not actually bring legitimate criticisms which doesn't look like an attack on others on the opposite spectrum which is exactly what it looks to us with your approach
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@liberaltears1714 well if you known some history between Ukraine and Russia you would know it's not just solely annexation as you westerners read in propagandised media, Ukraine was already a hotspot for the West to have control over Russian aerospace, not to mention the amount of former cold war weaponry Ukraine had inherited from the USSR and many of it being on the hands of the West would have been a huge risk for Russia and it also didn't help with how many people in Ukraine had developed facistic elements from the past and allied with Nazi Germany against Russia in WW2, even if Ukraine was annexed in the past by the Tsars the cultural and social relations that Ukrainians had with Russia wasn't something that can be abandoned here especially with how the far right in Ukraine tried to remove the Russian language in the Eastern regions of Donbass and had threatened any Ukrainians with Russian ethnicity in the past, it isn't just solely for annexation especially when the western media in the past reported on these incidents and took no action against it despite many outcrys, it isn't a real threat and is made to do so by the West which is obviously working like how it did with 9/11 and the cold war tactics which are still continued for western convenience
Countries which are supposed to be defending their territories and had past cultural ties with countries which look to reunite due to outside interferences are being demonised for western convenience and called regimes, as if the West never was a regime in the first place where it has installed its multiple military bases in various corners around the world giving fellow superpowers no authority over their own airspace
You talk about annexation done by foreign countries and make comparisons to the annexations done by the West, let me ask you a question here then, what cultural or borders ties does the US have with countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yugoslavia, Vietnam, North Korea and various other nations which the West bombed and caused wanton destruction towards ? Yes it could be argued about the USSR as it in the past was considered a regime but is modern Russia or China be really considered in the same lines as the US or its western Allies here who have done discriminatory harm towards multiple nations
In the end I say do I justify the invasion here ? Of course not but the reasons for those actions and their seeds were already sowed by the West which is also continuing in Taiwan too where Taiwan has been radically westernised for them to be coerced into war against China in the near future which the West still continues to push for and cutting ties with China like they did with Russia
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@loinaluks2251 well the first point is quite interesting, I did say there were other factors in the culmination of those great wars like the great depression which may have put a huge dent on the world economy at that time which may have put them into desperation but the fact of the matter was the pre conflicts that happened in multiple colonies in Africa and Asia were reaching a turning point,the West really puts this propaganda that Germany and the Axis powers are at fault but really the seeds of war were right there since the beginning, powers like Britain and France had to set aside differences they had from the colonial wars to ally against Germany which under the Kaiser had annexed a significant number of African colonies
I do think WW2 was a failure by Germany to continue gaining back it's lost position and various colonies which they lost under pressure from the Allies and having all these facistic ideals which Germany strived for under an attempt similar to the British Empire, the elements of fascism was already present in the West especially with various political parties like the BUF lead by Oswald Mosley and many others who rallied up many labour unions across Britain giving promises to fix the damages caused by the Great Depression and for Britain to gain back it's power in world politics and sufficient control over it's colonies once the internal politics is taken care off, they also had multiple fundings from Nazi Germany and the Italian fascist block but knew such a system would still continue the power struggle they will have in the near future so the Parliament didn't take any risk against it especially with Germany's past with the Kaiser, really WW2 had many elements where things could have gone differently if not for these powers to expend themselves and their military into losing control over their colonial outposts, so you could say their greed for power lead to their own doom especially when it they would have cooperated at least have had their Empires intact even if under submission, i believe that Hitler's ideology is stemmed from resurrecting the previous Empire led by the previous Chancellor Kaiser Wilhelm II and building a Neo capitalist order which bases itself on ultranationalist ideals which they learnt from the consequences of the Industrial revolution, the rapid rise in technology especially with the cost did not resonate with the people who were forced under extreme work hours and their negative sentiments towards their oligarchs who didn't favor them anymore were used as a pretext for war
I do agree Nazi Germany's invasion of Russia is certainly not well understood especially when Russia already had gone through with regime change and by the 1930s they already had established sufficient military power taken from the previous Tsar so I do say it was a bold and reckless move especially when the Allies already had been flanking them from the West, but what I seen throughout western interpretations of WW2 is really how much credit they would like to give to themselves for ending Hitler's reign but really the history of the Soviets who fought off against Nazi Germany in the eastern front is completely forgotten almost for western convenience, I do think these topics need to be discussed and understood well for those who are tainted by western culture and believe in extreme nationalist ideals
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well Ben Norton talking points were too repetitive with him continuously mentioning the coups carried by the US which westerners probably do not care about and the way that western propagandists work is by targeting convenient information selectively, they keep focusing on the current affairs of Nicaragua and how the President is carrying out censorship of other opposition parties on the state and to be fair it's working for those elites as people in modern times will focus on their current situation instead of the past, and what the President is doing even if for good intentions as to avoid western intervention among the masses will still be seen as a dictatorship trying to censor others even if those are evil, the point is the interview in the eyes of the average person will be seen as Nicaragua as a dictatorship which is censoring all controversial figures and the act itself is what the west is focusing and demonising the president for and trying to have the world against them, that person Manuel who was on the debate clearly never mentions any of the past history and focuses on the present which is a perfect way of manipulation for the masses who could care less about the past and focus on current affairs and the people watching the interview will rather not care about the west's wrongdoings and will focus on Nicaragua's issue with tackling western disinformation, the west's way of disinformation campaigns they carry on foreign soil is seen and they often will use manipulation tactics like these to try to make the opposition as evil as possible while trying to preach their culture, it's seen throughout history with how Europeans had convinced the indigenous people of better lifestyle that what they were getting from their tribes only for the colonizers to betray the populace who were helping them destroy each other, these are wartime tactics which are obviously manipulative and works well especially among the average public which has zero understanding of their country and are extremely individualistic which the west has created this culture around the world. Even if being selfish is positive sometimes doesn't mean abandoning your own kin which is what western culture is famous for, the way that Nicaragua is carrying out censorship is something that people will find relation with their own country and will now find a reason to demonise Nicaragua even if they can't see the fact how their western disinformation campaigns work, the interview on a pragmatic standpoint will not support Norton's viewpoints as they only focus on the past issues and not current ones which we aren't getting a full picture off, Nicaragua's approach towards this is surely getting them demonized by westerners and unless they allow opposition parties around like how the US does but have better control as to allow freedom of speech even if disinformation will at least put Nicaragua in a good light as they wouldn't be stooping down low as the US proxies and opposition parties do, hopefully they stop the censorship as people need to get all viewpoints for them to decide which one is right and why the west's ways are clearly dooming then, the point is people should get all viewpoints even if controversial and then decide what is the better way for Nicaragua to progress which doesn't involve war or chaos and economic prosperity and social development
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1941blkwidow well I'm pretty sure South America did not belong to the US anyways and it is better Nicaragua maintaining relations with China especially unlike the west which wants regime change and westernises almost every country it tries trading with even Saudi Arabia to some extent although not in the way they wanted, China only maintains economic relations with its fellow countries,not invade their politics and install client regimes on their country and sanction them if they feel like it
yeah voice on how our government works ? Are you even hearing yourself buddy? You do realise their regime change failed here and that Taliban already started gaining grounds due to how pointless the reforms were, and that the west didn't just choose because they wanted to and had "freedom of speech" on their side or something, you westerners are completely in ignorance thinking that you can just invade a country and involve yourselves in their politics without having any proper relations or understanding between them, its no different from the colonial era where the west chose whichever country they can invade and decide which leaders should be in control but at least i argue the colonisers were more honest and open about it unlike the US which uses soft power to hide all its dirty work, your government has no voice or anything here especially when it comes to foreign policy and just chooses to invade another country if it didn't work in their favor and you westerners just use that as a pretext to claim they have a voice or something,
yeah do not push the American people? Are you westerners ignorant or just can't see the fact your military is in our soil pretending to defend against China or Russia? Does China or Russia even have any military bases near the US or its allies as we are pretty sure it's the opposite, the west has had enough privileges here especially when your oligarchs are the ones who bomb our country without you people ever trying to stop it, why didn't you westerners speak about it huh? Is it because it was more convenient for countries to be in economic sanctions and be leveraged if they don't comply and westerners gained cheaper priced goods from foreign countries due to their currency being less valued than the USD due to obvious western bias ? Please using indirect threats against the rest of the world does not work like that buddy
we are past the days where conventional weapons could colonise a country now we got nuclear capabilities which could end all life on this planet and we foreigners would rather prefer to live than invade the west or something which you westerners fear and only wish to have our countries in our control away from western influences, we just want our countries back and westerners leave our country for good especially when coercion by the west towards our people does not work at least not without people abandoning their identity which is harmful to our systems
i don't see common ground with you westerners too due to how aggressive expansionistic your countries approaches are and various cold war tactics like soft power which is used on our countries and our youths being manipulated into joining the west and abandoning our country for Western conveniences, it seems nothing but leverage by the west here and we don't wish to cause wars over this but at least let us live and the west live too, and with that power which your oligarchs stole return it and let us rebuild our countries instead of putting your military on foreign soil, we foreigners just want to live in the same way the west is doing and under our terms not for western conveniences, that's all I ask especially when the threat from China or Russia is only exaggerated by the west for no reason other than fear of losing their control over the world like they did for many years now, the west can work as economic partners but nothing more no cultural exchanges as to harm our country especially when we have seen the consequences of it already, you may try to understand or not but we foreigners just don't want wars anymore and lose more people to proxy wars especially when any further push will only lead to mutual destruction, it will be only be beneficial for both sides if we look for our own interests and not each other like the west is doing as such a thing is only causing our countries and people to harbor hatred towards the west and wish they pay reparations for the damages caused
On a side note I don't even wish for any invasion or something like you westerners fear and wish for countries to have their sovereignty and build other countries economies especially paying back all the damages caused by the west which will obviously be a lot especially including the colonial era where countries are still suffering from poverty due to how much trauma European powers caused and westerners are willing to forget all that even recent damages they are still causing?
If you think I'm xenophobic or anti western or something I do have some positives about western culture and i do like some of the countryside culture overall as they maintained themselves in the past but sadly city culture ruined their lands too and even among the cityside there are a few positives but really the negatives outweigh them all really if I'm honest and is one of the main reasons why we foreigners don't want our people to be following the same negatives, it's upon westerners to improve it and again we foreigners would be better off if westerners left their culture from our countries if they aren't willing to acknowledge our culture and fix their problems and economically too which the west has introduced systems which doesn't work in our countries which westerners aren't willing to acknowledge
if westerners are still going to remain the same without having any understanding towards our side and why we feel the way we do towards the west then really there's no helping then and if they are willing to change and leave our systems alone then we would be better off as at least there will only be better economic trade relations like how it was during the pre-colonial era where China and other Empires had respected others borders and didn't seek expansion across all parts of the world unlike the west is doing now
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1941blkwidow yeah concentration camps, mind remind you of what those Guantanamo camps were? Or those reeducation camps for native Americans were for? Please westerners can't just stop claiming themselves as saviors or the world while spilling blood and using soft power to sugarcoat their actions, just stop we foreigners know exactly what westerners have done to the rest of the world and here you come claiming about dictators well how about warmongers like Churchill, the Queen during the British Empire, Truman the man who allowed the only usage of nuclear weapons on civilians, Bush with 9/11, Biden with bombing Belgrade Syria and arming Neo Nazis in Ukraine, Trump with war on Syria prosecution of migrants with violence, Bill Clinton, Obama, Nixon and various other warmongers in the list who have allowed invasion of various foreign countries across the globe, if thought there must be some consideration from westerners for what their oligarchs are doing to the rest of the world and how much damages they have caused to the rest of the world and it's masses, if the common folk do not get rid of western hegemony which they are leveraged via cultural and socio-economically they will continue to be subjugated to the propaganda you westerners put out pretending to be the world police, the west is one of the most genocidal, imperialist expansionist alliances who have committed various crimes against humanity in their colonial past and still continue to do so
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well how do you think corruption comes from really? Especially when a system which is run by multiple entities have multiple differences each with their own agenda to gain power or try to monopolise the system in their own way, this creates differences which cause chaos among the public and some rich stooges resort to try make as much money as they can to survive or for their future generations to have the same lavish lifestyle that they have, capitalism also encourages inheritance which in the wrong hands causes more problems to the people via bribing or anyone at the top position who is rich to make changes against the publics interests, corruption is something that will be existent due to the nature of power and how it's used and under a system which is divided by various people looking for power it creates more problems than actually fixing it, i mean what arguments can you bring up to help the people against a corporatist who is obsessed with making more money whether for the sake of his family and his future generations or for material gain, the concentration of power should be evenly distributed instead of having one side have more than the other, there are arguments for the fact that the people at the top will have full control over the people but really this is something that has been going on throughout history and the least we can do is to have people who actually look from a longer term for humanity instead of having individualistic mentality, even from a business perspective a corporatist needs the people to get to the top position which doesn't cause problems on the long term, the idea behind communism is the fact that there will be neither rich or poor but again this system is relatively new like a hundred years ago compared to capitalism and corporatism which existed centuries ago, i do agree whatever system is present imperialistic ideals is something that will be present but it all depends upon how power is distributed whether in multiple hands where there's disparity of power some being high or some low or a group which all have the same amount of power, any system can work if it's done properly even dictatorship or monarchy where there were some good kings in the past too
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidc9214 so you seriously compared Brian to a vlogger? You do know hes been doing this for years now and probably has better insight on military affairs than "vloggers", he's been in the military and knows how military operations are conducted and has a better analysis than so called professional commenters like you westerners, how is it really a disaster for Russia when their main objective always is securing the Donbass region which they have been successfully completed and what's remaining is to denazifying Ukraine, you westerners just make it a serious issue and surely provide disinformation as to confuse the remaining public here, what proof or arguments do you have that Russia has suffered heavy losses despite the fact that Ukraine is suffering many times more losses as documented many times with how much infantry and artillery Ukraine possesses which Brian proved many times its way lower than what Russia has fired in a single day, it has been proven Ukraine suffered heavy losses in the so called " Kherson Offensive" which failed spectacularly and only gained a significant gains in Kharkov which Russia already evacuated many citizens and it's military from there in the first place, really it's more like westerners exaggerating this victory as to even make ridiculous claims that Ukraine will claim Donbass and Crimea back which is a pipe dream at best with what Russia has on its arsenal, nobody is sugarcoating it other than you people who claim Ukraine hasn't lost any of its brigades which to any military expert will be a laughable statement, Brian has already put out not just theory but legitimate statements from Pentagon sources which itself is far as legitimate as it goes really, it's embarassing how you westerners act so loud and make outlandish statements while being out of reality of the situation with Russia still in control of Donbass and will probably create a buffer zone around the region as to prevent any further NATO forces from interfering in the war which you westerners of course will provide weapons to Nazis which you always do,
It's embarassing how wrong you westerners are really when the rest of the world knows exactly how the west operates it's hegemonic ways onto foreign nations and Ukraine is just next on the long line of countries to destabilize, really all the west has managed to do is put EU in a economic suicide with sanctions which EU were completely dependent on Russia whether they liked it or not and EU will suffer the Winter hard while Russia will make deals with foreign nations like China and Iran, etc. and will increase its economic value on the global market having a positive image of denazifying Ukraine and you westerners will continue living in your delusions creating regimes while you sit in your comfort zone whining about your own economic conditions while being isolated from the rest of the world due to hegemonic ways held onto for centuries
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@louissosa1535 well you misread my point, I said that your government is using their culture as a weapon to have full financial leverage and getting rid of other foreign cultures and desecrating anything they find inconvenient or spiteful, the people of the west are at full fault here too but unknowingly and due to ignorance which they continue especially when their culture is used to convince us foreigners that their culture is better and to abandon their own culture to have better lives like westerners have, example I say is with Brian and other westerners who are speaking on behalf of foreigners against western hegemony instead of foreigners speaking it themselves and representing themselves and not others, we foreigners don't just want a repeat of the same things where you westerners win but our systems and culture are abandoned and desecrated for westerners convenience, we don't want a win which will not give us freedom over our own country and our traditions which now have been bastardised due to western thinking, and many westerners especially those believing in propaganda aren't just going to listen based on idealism here, we foreigners expect a change from you westerners to stop involving with our matters and leave our culture alone but we don't see any of that happening and all we get is more of our systems and traditions harmed for western conveniences, we want to see changes not just words which are just simple to say
i don't hate you westerners or possess any hatred towards anyone but just the western culture which we are forced to live in due to new generation with power are making their people abandon their culture to replace it, i don't harbor any hate and would like to see changes here not just words which we have seen enough of it, you should see how bad it is in various countries here and maybe understand how much harm is caused to
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1