Comments by "ricardo kowalski" (@ricardokowalski1579) on "ColdFusion"
channel.
-
2
-
By confounding "sentient" with "human" and "intelligent" an agenda can/is being pushed
Not mattering how much (or IF) a program is "sentient" or "intelligent" , it is not human. That means two things:
a) it does not automatically receive the same rights as a human;
b) humans have to act humanely towards all entities, ie not be cruel, but nothing else . We should act humanely because of what WE ARE, not because of what we are acting UPON.
There may be different forms of sentience. So what? We have no tools to identify them or measure them. If we are ignorant or oblivious to forms of sentience different than our own, we must conclude that recognizing other forms of sentience is not a requirement for survival of our species. It may be fun. useful, entertaining, but not a need.
There is no need to use "sentience" as reason to be "humane'. The attempt to declare something as "sentient", and by this declaration force a change in behavoir is putting the cart in front of the horses.
The objective here is to create a new dimension to further restrict liberties...24/7 surveillance of the individual by AI. An AI that does not sleep or grow tired, but can denounce the individual for breaking the "rules". Unknown rules, non-legislated rules, buried in the code that is "propietary secret"... and enforced by law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1