Comments by "ricardo kowalski" (@ricardokowalski1579) on "UnHerd" channel.

  1. "lead to tyranny" how naive. Tyranny is here, it never left.
    418
  2. they are keying cars and setting car dealerships on fire... but the "right" is the threat.
    25
  3. "free Palestine"? Yes. But how do you free a people from their elected "leaders"?
    23
  4. Ms Shiva walks a fine line to avoid falling into a luddite trap. This is noted and respected. Even if you disagree with her comments, there is an happy vital component to her delivery. This is a welcome change from the doom and gloom everywhere else.
    8
  5. “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile—hoping it will eat him last.” Sir Winston Churchill True then. True now. Sweden just figured out that it was next in line to be eaten.
    8
  6.  @bhz8947  so, what is YOUR definition?
    5
  7. 10:30 Everything this man says can be knocked down by a single question: If the objective, and the solution, was the DONBASS (Donetz and Luhanzk) Why did Russia advance on Kiev?
    4
  8. Socialists then: We should be more like Sweeden Sweeden: No lockdowns Socialists now: Never mind Sweeden! We must be lockedown... like China
    3
  9. Radical-ANYTHING is the issue. Respectfully.
    3
  10. YTube is hiding the new videos from the subscriber feed
    2
  11. Listen up people, the cheap labor pool of China and all Asia has now dried up. The same way it dried up in Japan post war. Large flows of goods made by low cost labor are no longer the driving force of trade or economy. Do not confuse free trade and globalization with offshoring
    2
  12.  @peterhardie4151  please get your story straight You can only pick one: 1-Ukraine was/is a threat to Russia 2- Ukraine was/is weak and a three day special millitary operation will wipe it out Pick your lies carefully
    2
  13.  @peterhardie4151  why yes it is! You are smarter than you let on! Good for you Now understand that this false dichotomy is not mine ... It is RT, Pravda's and Russia's special operation battle plan. Be a dear and go argue with them.
    2
  14.  @peterhardie4151  sorry. You disagree with the people that created the false dichotomy. Go argue with them. Not me. Once you are clear in which lie you want yo put forth, and quit "speculating"... Only then we may know if we "disagree"
    2
  15.  @Two_Tier_Britain  AI has made me realize that "natural" intelligence is scarce. Respectfully 👍🙂👍
    2
  16. there is no choice if the choice is "automatic enrollment". If democracy is the government of the people, then a government nudging behavoir from the people is not democratic
    2
  17. words for the wise
    1
  18.  @ClownCarCoup  👍
    1
  19.  @casteretpollux  "There was never any Battle of Kiev." if you say so.
    1
  20.  @jackistooloud  yeah. I do. Does the government sell cars? Is the capitol "private property"? There is a difference
    1
  21. kevin27 Because the "right" is a boogey man. There is no "right" on planet earth, but for the house of Saad and the Kims
    1
  22. This woman is NOT "stateless". She choose to be a citizen of the "islamic state". Her decision has consequences. There is no case FOR Ms Begum. There is always a case for keeping politics from interfering in justice. A known criminal must not be allowed to wrap herself on the later.
    1
  23. Teddy Roosevelt: Talk softly and carry a big stick D Trump: Forget the talking, carry a HUGE stick 👍
    1
  24. 9:15 "asymptomatic form" Another "killer" illness that has NO SYMPTOMS!!! Hollywood is known for the RE-makes....now public health is also rehashing scripts
    1
  25. This is the kind of data that was needed to achieve "informed consent" MANDATING a medical intervention while the data required for consent is unavailable (or supressed) is criminal activity The failure is not that cowards yielded to terror, the failure will be if we leave the criminals unpunished
    1
  26. She may end up convicted to death in the UK. The risk and harm of death is greater than being left "stateless". Also, she is stateless because she became a citizen of an "islamic state"
    1
  27.  @SamuelBlackMetalRider  we just came out of two years where we couldn't travel, yutube censored videos, medical profesionals were thrown in jail for making prescriptions... And there is no investigation nor consequences to the abuses of government. That is the "f🤘ck" I'm talking about.
    1
  28.  @leightaft7763  ai leads to...?
    1
  29.  @guilhermehx7159  yes it can.
    1
  30.  @timfool  so name calling. Kindergarden level debate champion
    1
  31.  @primeryai  did you read the tittle?
    1
  32.  @primeryai  i judge the tittle. The content is worthless, not going to judge or comment on it
    1
  33.  @skoto8219  we have not overthrown the tyranny we already have. So we don't have to wait for a "better" tyranny that cannot be overthrown.
    1
  34.  @therainman7777  strawman argument: I never said "we shouldn't care". Go project and hallucinate somewhere else. As to your "demonstration", bad analogy. The "doctor" is also wrong. A widely prescribed drug may cause MORE cancer cases, or cause WORST cancer cases.... But never was the "lead" of cancer. Cancer existed even before any prescription drugs.
    1
  35.  @tonysaint353  you can't mitigate. Just let natural selection play it's hand. Some social circles or families will be inmune from these attacks. We must stop "saving" and "equalizing" people.
    1
  36.  @therainman7777  so your argument is calling me "silly"? Who appointed you judge of "pseudo-anything"? Bring and argument, or go home.
    1
  37.  @therainman7777  "what he is clearly saying"... Kathy Newman much? Now you speak for Mr Bostrom.... So are you saying that Bostrom can't tittle his video "AI will bring a WORSE tyranny"?
    1
  38.  @therainman7777  as for the medicine causing MORE cancer. Or making cancer WORST, the analogy does not work. The discussion is never that THIS new medicine "leads to cancer"... is that we already have cancer, and it will make it worse/ more/ agressive.
    1
  39.  @abhinavmenon9140  I don't tolerate tyranny. Not even "light" , nor "moderate". Tyrants always pretend THEIR brand of tyranny is " better" or "with sprinkles".
    1
  40. abhinavmenon9140 Why should I tolerate tyranny that is less than "absolute"? I don't want ANY tyranny. Tyrants say their brand of tyranny is "better" or "with sprinkles".
    1
  41.  @abhinavmenon9140  you confuse "law of the jungle" with tyranny. All fish get eaten small and large alike. But no fish, no matter how large, controls and punishes other fish. There is no government among fishes, so there can be no tyranny.
    1
  42.  @abhinavmenon9140  you do know tyranny predates cities and concrete jungles by several centuries. You confuse cause and effect, control does not cause tyranny, tyranny causes control.
    1
  43. Paul shows to be well meaning, but naive and full of hubris. You cannot reject freedom, freedom is a curse. Even when you choose your prision and your master, you are excercising your freedom. He appeals to giving life meaning, to believe in something, beyond the material (not shopping)...but he doesn't understand that his freedom to believe in that requires that he allow others the freedom to "fail" and believe in ("empty" according to him) materialism. People NEED NOT be saved from freedom. Not by you Paul. Not by anybody. Letting your neighbor fail because of his own choices is the true measure of will. ---- I am not rich enough to pity you
    1