Comments by "ricardo kowalski" (@ricardokowalski1579) on "Turns out, Anarcho-Capitalism ISN'T "Anarchy" (RE: LiquidZulu)" video.

@KoleKojot 1- No, it cannot be done without bloodshed. The collectivists are many and they are willing to use violence. 2- An-Caps do approve to the right to self defense, against violent impostion from people that use violence first. AnCaps are not against violence, just against initiating violence. This is an important point. AnCaps don't turn the other cheek. Respectfully
21
@maurices5954 yes 👍
8
@MisterBoggins you fail to understand there is nothing to "enforce' Ancapstan is completely voluntary. There is no need to enforce anything.
3
@MisterBoggins again, you are mistaken. There is government: SELF-government. The ONLY moral government is to govern thy self. Also, Anarchism is literally "no government" So saying "no-government" is impossible is denial a priori. Your argument cannot be your desired conclusion. Try again!
3
@MisterBoggins no I am not Me as an individual am my own government. There is no contradiction. I have control and monopoly of violence over myself. If I am to delegate or elect representatives, I must first be able to self-govern. A slave cannot vote, delegate, or elect an external government. Do slaves vote for their masters? But a free man can choose self-government. Or choose to associate volutarily, to delegate to representatives. In all cases, it is voluntary because it is the expression of the will. "by the *conscent of the governed*... remember?
3
13:35 BINGO Government ≠ State When a country has elections... the GOVERNMENT changes.. but the STATE remains the same. Until the dictator starts messing around with the institutions. What is STATE? State is a collection (constellation? that would be poetic) of institutions: common law, bill of rights, carta magna, guilds, cooperatives, private arbitrers, private companies, people that speak the same language, people that live in the same territory, the territory itself, traditions, even intagibles as regional food or festivities. What is GOVERNMENT? An institution hellbent on applying violence to control any and all aspects of the STATE. (What is the objective of this control is irrelevant, sometimes is for economic profit, sometimes is just lust for power itself) AnCAPs have a problem with GOVERNMENT, because by definition it cannot be voluntary. 14:19 " politics are the affairs of the people" This is where we get "res publica" => republic ----Res publica (also spelled rēs pūblica to indicate vowel length) is a Latin phrase, loosely meaning 'public affair'. It is the root of the word 'republic', and the word 'commonwealth' has traditionally been used as a synonym for it; however, translations vary widely according to the context. Solid content. Respect and regards.🎩
2
@MisterBoggins There is no consent under a certain age. We can argue about the age, but once there is an "underage" there is no consent. Your strawman failed. Self sacrifice is a personal decision. If you want firemen to run into burning buildings, you must accept "occult practices" to be morally consistent. So far you failed: 1- attempted to deny self goverment exists 2- attempted to make "enforcement" part of anarchy Please stop running, changing the subject will not retroactively validate your previous comments. You already failed.
1
@MisterBoggins My will is the only way I take things. Stating the obvious is indeed boring. Yes, yawn. 🥱
1
@MisterBoggins "against" what? are you hallucinating that either of us is a spokeman for TIK? This is between you and me, buster.
1
@MisterBoggins In your hallucination you make comments but I initiated the argument. Don't cast a stone, or a message with a facepalm, if you are going to pretend you didn't start it.
1
@MisterBoggins geez. you can't keep your own word? You just said you stopped! Which one is it? stop or go? Make up your mind.
1
@MisterBoggins I am so sorry that your will depends on the actions of others. I have made no claims to stop. YOU DID. And now you backtrack upon YOURSELF I would feel sorry for you, but your contradictions are delicious and I am not prone to mercy.
1
17:50 communicate not ofuscate The collectivists have been successful in fusing the concepts of leader-party-government-state-fatherland into a single entity to suit their needs. This is where the confusion between state and government comes from. The colectivists created this confusion over decades from academia and newspapers. They shaped the debate, debased the words of meaning. This fusing is the keystone of all the forms of name calling and propaganda leader-fatherland allows you to call any opposition traitors and spies (North Korea huche) leader-state allows you to call any oppositon as violent "anti-system" (Italian Facism) leader-government allows you to call any opposition as "terrorists" (Fauci covid) leader-party allows you to call any oppositon as radical and reactionary (Chavez "escualidos")
1