Comments by "Kate S" (@KateeAngel) on "Why Musk Is Wrong About Mars" video.

  1. Also a city with million people on Earth relies on SO MUCH agricultural area, which grows food for it. There aren't any "self-sustaining cities" by definition, that is impossible.
    12
  2. How many of them would remain after experiencing Mars conditions for 6 months? 😂
    10
  3. Not cold enough! But there is Antarctic as well
    7
  4. Also, underground deep bunkers on Earth would be much cheaper, could use geothermal energy, and would be able to save more people in cases of asteroid fall or nuclear war
    5
  5. Terraforming Mars is a huge meaninless waste of resources , money, effort and time. And would take more than 1000 years anyway. Our current civilization can hardly plan anything for 10 years let alone 1000. And you are talking about millions of years as if anything can be predicted on such time scale.🤦🤦🤦🤦 The great example of how public was deluded by popular mass media and sci-fi
    3
  6. Lmao delulu! He over promises and under delivers all the time. You should have been under a rock last decade
    2
  7. ​ @dvv18  what for? There is no reason for any human to live their whole lives outside of Earth in the next 3-5 centuries at least. Ok if you really want, you can do it, but forcing that on other people, including kids, should be illegal
    2
  8. Musk is a liar not a dreamer
    2
  9. ​ @charliekempf  its geological history and opportunity to study its past, maybe even ancient life forms which lived there. Introduce flowing water and atmosphere - introduce weathering - destroy ancient geological and palaeontological remains
    1
  10. They wanted to colonize and steal everything from indigenous people. Here, fixed it for you! If that is your inspiration, please leave Earth as soon as possible. I don't want to share a planet with you
    1
  11. ​ @bigmock141  which would take more than a 1000 years, and so many resources and money that you can bankrupt whole civilization 😂
    1
  12. ​ @TheGingerjames123  lmao you don't know much about biology hun if you think it can have a significant amount of fossil fuels
    1
  13. And if that falls to the surface? Lmao. Just as much of a useless speculation as terraforming Mars at this point. Focus on parts of space exploration and habitation which can be realistically achieved in the next 50 years. Otherwise you are just engaging in idle fantasies pretending to think about important things
    1
  14. Not all, just the existential threats we created ourselves. Also, we don't really need to go anywhere else. We can, and we want, but don't NEED that
    1
  15. There is no reason for humans to populate everything. Including other planets. The population will stabilize, we won't need more area than we already have. Ideas like space colonization and even deep ocean colonization were being spread like crazy in the 60s and 70s when global population growth was on its highest. And people, like 5 year olds couldn't realise, that trends change and such huge population growth won't continue forever.
    1
  16. ​ @pleasedontwatchthese9593  most regular subs don't go very deep. There are only few subs in existence which can go to deepest parts of oceans
    1
  17. Musk takes a lot of government subsidies. A lot of taxpayers' money
    1
  18. There is also Greenland 😏
    1
  19. Want before they actually experience living there for at least half a year
    1
  20. ​​ @SpaceAdvocate  the machinery would be a part of self-sustaining habitat, dungus. If something doesn't rely on living natural biosphere it is a self-sustaining habitat by definition
    1
  21. ​ @FringeWizard2  depends on which part of India 😂
    1