Comments by "Kate S" (@KateeAngel) on "PBS Terra" channel.

  1. People still speak about it as if it is some revolutionary idea. While my grandma figured it out in 1952, when she had one child when she was 25, and stopped after that
    21
  2. ​ @TheDanEdwards  same horrors are happening right NOW. If you didn't notice
    18
  3. ​ @358studios  yup, the few richest people take half of all wealth of the world. We would have enough to sustain growing elderly population if they didn't hoard all wealth.
    6
  4. ​ @tjpprojects7192  they were raised in a different culture, indigenous to some Pacific island. Maybe their culture doesn't teach boys and men toxic ideas as much as our own does
    6
  5. It's all due to vitamin D availability. Before transitioning to agricultural diets, low in vitamin D, Europeans and Asians were still darker than today. Weather has nothing to do with it, UV yes, but certainly not temperature or rain LMAO
    5
  6. ​ @ochotunes nature has recovered from Permian extinction. So it can recover from any current crisis for sure. Humans should worry about themselves, we are destroying our own future, not all of life or the planet
    4
  7. Most women always worked actually. Only rich and upper middle class didn't. But, in the past many families lived in extended family household and grandparents could take care of grandkids
    3
  8. I have seen streets in small towns in Russia without sidewalks, but they usually also don't have many cars either
    3
  9.  @ImJef  lol, what a fool, they didn't need a wheel in their habitat and lifestyle, but they knew enough about how their habitat functioned, because they depended on it for survival
    2
  10. ​ Music-wu5de we would have enough money to support elderly if the richest few percent didn't hoard half of all wealth
    2
  11.  @ImJef  you have never heard about Mississippian culture or Anasazi? You are the only "cave man" here, ignorant and foolish
    1
  12. The current economy is a ponzi scheme, addicted to false idea of endless growth. And that also destroys our environment, the situation which can ACTUALLY kill us. That is the only reason why "population always needs to grow" - to keep this terrible status quo
    1
  13. 👍
    1
  14.  @alejandromartinez3475  no, grassland carbon sequestration is better. The most of their biomass is in the roots, it is stored in the soil afterwards, while trees fall and decompose and carbon is released back
    1