Comments by "robs2020" (@sbor2020) on "GBNews" channel.

  1. Why are the parent preaching "save the children" the most offensive people? It's fair to say that in the future their kids will be in therapy, reflecting on over-demanding parenting leading to maladaptive traits, such as the avoidance of threats; substance abuse, self-harm. Don't make your children what Reich called "living machines".
    4
  2. The ECHR ensures that governments, including the UK, uphold the human rights they committed to protect. Do you remember the "Justice for Hillsborough 96" campaign? The ECHR helped bring justice to the families of victims of gross negligence after decades of failure by UK institutions. Was that 'interfering,' or was it ensuring justice for those who had been let down? Holding governments accountable isn’t interference - it’s safeguarding fairness and rights.
    4
  3.  @Mini-c137  That refugees that cross the channel are illegal, that Brexit would be easy when clear in the knowledge that he had not political elected power whatsoever; that he had no knowledge of Russian interference, that the EU is unelected, and that the EU made laws, and that the UK was not a sovereign country. That’s six for starters. Now can you give me ONE tangible benefit of Brexit?
    4
  4.  @anyatranter5588  Is this the beginning of providing evidence to support a claim, or ignoring the evidence and conspiracist nonsense?
    4
  5. If you are talking about the loss of lives on both sides, then- you can't feel cold hard indifference . Not everyone lacks empathy.
    4
  6. You didn't listen to him, did you? Ignore resoning and evidence and jump to a conclusion.
    4
  7. Great interview.
    4
  8. “When one watches some tired hack ... one often has a curious feeling that one is not watching a live human being but some kind of dummy, the appropriate noises are coming out of his larynx, but his brain is not involved” ― George Orwell, Politics and the English Language
    4
  9. "They" don't ruin your fun: you can pick up Chubby Brown DVDs at any Service Station.
    4
  10. Brand is right-wing? One of yours?
    4
  11. Why do Reform UK voters often claim to speak for the entire country when, in reality, you represent only a small and unpleasant minority? Referring to "our" country as if your views encompass everyone is misleading and divisive. You don’t speak for the vast majority of people who reject your populist rhetoric. Please speak for yourselves and your fellow populists, but stop co-opting the rest of "us" who don’t align with your narrow and confrontational worldview.
    4
  12.  @philgriff586  OK now which of those cases you point are to do with EU policy?
    4
  13.  @philgriff586  I can only surmise that the answer to the question is ‘nothing’. As Carl Sagan said, ‘extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’.
    4
  14. Ironic comment?
    4
  15. WHAT WILL REFORM UK 🤡🤡🤡🤡DO FOR MENTAL HEATH IN THE NHS? LAST YEAR, REFERRALS TO ADULT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ROSE BY SOME 11% ON THE PREVIOUS YEAR. WE DON'T WANT "CULT OF PERSONALITY", 🤡🤡🤡🤡YOU SHOULD BE DEMANDING TO KNOW WHAT REFORM 🤡🤡🤡🤡WILL DO . 🤡🤡🤡🤡
    4
  16.  OldEnglish Ale  If I'm not mistaken, we are considering the notion that the EU is run by 'unelected bureaucrats'. I point out that there are fewer unelected officials in the EU than with the management of major cities like London Paris, and Berlin.
    4
  17. On a serious note, would you call Pope John Paul II woke? His Catechism from the mid 1980's seeks to outline the main ideas and beliefs of Catholicism. Deum humanam sexuum transcendere distinctionem. Ille nec vir est nec femina, Ille est Deus (God transcends the distinction between male and female, he is God) . As both the CoE and the Catholic Church've gone woke, maybe think of going Russian Orthodox!
    4
  18. She considers herself a British Muslim. Explain the problem you have with British Muslims.
    4
  19. Which paintings were these?
    4
  20. And losing freedom of movement makes it even more difficult now. Who would vote for such thing?
    4
  21. What do you mean not executed properly ? Do you mean The EU - UK Withdrawal Agreement or The EU - UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement ? And how are these different from the non-existent agreement that you voted for in June 2016?
    4
  22. Over two years since exiting, how have the people of the UK benefited? Give us just one tangible benefit.
    4
  23. People here are able to make rash generalisations, misconceptions and stereotyping that is rather dismaying. Perhaps that is where we are, with social media you can engage your opinions, but not engage your humanity. As in Dante's Hell, Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate (Give up all hope, you who enter) Of course, you're not going to LIKE this comment as it takes thinking . You would clearly rather engage your opinions than your humanity. Circularity.
    4
  24. Mogg dressing his disdain up in Swiftian allegory. If this is the disdain you have for your "honourable members", what total disregard you have for your GB News viewers. £800 per hour for this? YAHOO!
    4
  25.  @christinewilkinson2424  No. Starmer has an authoritarianism that is concerning. However, courts can now use Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, and Liz Truss' Public Order Act 2023, neither of which I repeatedly showed concern about the implications. It was a shame that no one on GB News or its viewers took these seriously when I said that the Tory government is stripping your civil rights.
    4
  26. Paul Burgess is a a retired Chartered Water Resources Engineer.
    4
  27. @ Bone spurs! Trump was a draft dodger!
    4
  28. You can always demonstrate. Oh no, you won't be able to if the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is passed into law. If you do demonstrate, you could face a four-year prison sentence. GB News is not interested in this.
    3
  29. Maybe because people vote for them! People like you voted for Brexit, and you thereby pushed for a a Brexit government to carry out your "democratic will", even though you had no Idea what the plan was, because no plan or agreement was drawn up. This government knew all along that Brexit would cause economic self-harm and make people and business worse off yet it intentionally acted to make people poorer. Even though you voted for government to make you worse off, you think that it hasn't gone far enough, and anyone deviating from the Brexit script is denounced as disloyal, and as traitors! You try to shift the blame it lay with the leaders you voted for.
    3
  30.  @davidmiller4078  Explain, if Blair is Trotsky, who is Stalin, and who is Lenin?
    3
  31.  @trixiek942  NFashisum
    3
  32. Look, let's be honest these people who are supposed to HATE Britain do not exist. They only exist in the minds of grifters to make you all angry. Patrick, and Darren are grifters, and GB News are funded to stoke anger and division. GB News is a mouthpiece of the oligarchs and the off-shore billionaires that control the Sunak government, and the ones that benefit from Brexit's deregulated disaster capitalism.
    3
  33. @Dagoth_Ur_1 I bet you don't understand anything about Marxism, nor have you read a word of Marx's work. Why would you when you can dog whistle?
    3
  34. Liz Hurley, or Kay Burley?
    3
  35. So Alan, if you think it is bollocks, then explain how this is NOT good for the UK . How this is not good for scientific research and development for the UK. And how this is not good for the knowledge base of universities and of the population at large , in terms of science literacy and improvements to technology in everything from cars and mobile phones to energy and bio-technology.
    3
  36.  @davfree9732  Why should we now take any notice of people like you who want to strip yourselves of your human, civil and labour rights? Get your priorities right!
    3
  37.  @pirateswamp9219  It's like a sociopath making false analogies.
    3
  38. Simple -ton
    3
  39. What specific, peer-reviewed evidence can you provide that shows UK fracking would significantly lower domestic energy prices in the short term ? If fracking is such a beneficial solution, why have so many UK communities, geologists, and even former energy ministers raised concerns about its environmental and seismic risks ?
    3
  40. Yrs, but not in Brussels, but Santiago. Will the UK have the all important veto?
    3
  41. These people had meetings with Cabinet ministers. Who might the Tories have been protecting? Lubov Chernukhin: Wife of Vladimir Chernukhin, a former Russian minister under Putin. She has donated millions to the Conservative Party. Alexander Temerko: A former senior executive in Russian energy firms and now a British citizen, Temerko has donated large sums to the Conservatives and is linked to the UK energy sector. Vladimir Chernukhin: Former Russian minister and husband of Lubov Chernukhin. While his wife is the formal donor, there are significant ties to Russian political circles. Who might have influenced the last government's energy policy? Michael Hintze: A major Conservative donor and a prominent figure in the hedge fund world, with investments in energy companies, including fossil fuels. Ian Taylor: Former CEO of Vitol, one of the world’s largest energy trading companies dealing in oil and gas. He was a notable Conservative donor. Ayman Asfari: CEO of Petrofac, a major player in the oil and gas services industry. He has made significant donations to the Conservative Party. Who might have been influencing you during the Tory government, and who might still be influencing you now? Jonathan Harmsworth (Viscount Rothermere): Owner of the Daily Mail and General Trust, which has been criticized for its use of offshore tax arrangements. The Rothermere family has made donations and has been supportive of Conservative policies. Lord Ashcroft: Former Conservative Party deputy chairman and significant donor. He has been linked to offshore tax arrangements and has media interests. David Rowland: A property tycoon with extensive business interests in offshore jurisdictions. Rowland has been a key donor to the Conservative Party and close to senior figures within the party. Christophe Harborne: A major donor who has been linked to various business ventures, including aviation fuel. He has donated substantial amounts to the Conservative Party and Reform UK.
    3
  42.  @jonesyjones7626  This is a false equivalence. Large donations from oligarchs and fossil fuel investors can influence national policies and undermine democracy, which has serious consequences for everyone. In contrast, a prime minister receiving a suit or his wife wearing nice dresses is more about optics, not policy decisions or democratic integrity. Comparing these two issues ignores the massive difference in scale and impact.
    3
  43.  @Doggle85  In what ways does it eschew democracy? The elections for the European Parliament was more democratic than the FPTP in the UK parliament. How elects those sitting in the house of Peers?
    3
  44. "Farage has turned utter entitlement in victimhood"! Emily Maitlis Explain what is factually incorrect about this. Her poor journalism or you poor critical thinking skills?
    3
  45. ​ @bwilliams572  Where is Labour Party Limited registered? Is it at Company House where Reform (UK) Limited registered? It is a business not a political party, nor indeed is there any democratic control by its members or democratic responsibility of its leaders. My point is that it is a sham of a party and a scamming business model. Is that clear enough for you?
    3
  46. to pork fat munching, Daily Express reading Gammonati
    3
  47. Don't worry about punctuation .
    3
  48. So pointing out that P&O’s trade has been adversely affected by the UK being outside the Customs Union, together with the ending of freedom of movement makes me an idiot, does it? Sure, the sacking of the 800 workers would have still happened had the UK been in the European Union. Well, take France; they have a labour code ( Code du travail ) that protects employees from the fire and rehire, the same kind of protection that the Conservative government voted against. It is the domestic sovereignty of UK government that allowed the sacking of those workers! What is more, allowing the breaking up of the P&O company and for it to be eventually owned by a UAE based investment company is the disaster capitalism that Farage himself supports . You cannot support this and also say you are for regulation that supports workers’ rights. Afterall, deregulation was the highest priority of the brexiteers in the capitalist class and those politicians that were supportive of it. In fact, the Brexiteers in the Conservative Party voted against the Employment and Trade Union Rights (Dismissal and Re-engagement) Bill that would have protected P&O workers. The deregulation of labour laws was one major reason for Tory politicians to support Brexit. Not knowing this or making this clear to viewers Nigel makes you either an idiot, or a liar. And I don't think for one second you are an idiot!
    3
  49. What about Mogg's mates (Mone etc,)?
    3
  50. @ I hear your frustration, and I agree that leaders – especially spiritual ones – have a responsibility to speak clearly and compassionately in the face of violence and suffering. But I don’t think Pope Francis was “against Jesus’s people.” His role is often to be a bridge-builder, not a politician or a judge. Meeting with representatives of groups in conflict, even terrible ones, isn’t always endorsement – it can be a path to diplomacy, pressure, or peace, however imperfect. He has consistently condemned violence and called out cruelty on all sides, including the horrors of war and terrorism. And while symbolism matters – yes, Easter Monday has deep resonance – I’d be cautious about drawing conclusions without clear evidence. In times like these, we need less division and more moral clarity rooted in compassion, not fear or vengeance.
    3