Comments by "robs2020" (@sbor2020) on "Patrick Christys: Does it come as a shock that this may well have come from a Wuhan laboratory?" video.

  1. Propagandist for right-wing conspiracy theories The whole interview from GB News referenced here has a real conspiracist agenda. This was a total misrepresentation of Dr. Chan’s work, the Harvard/MIT scientist cited in this polemic. Dr. Chan is an independent scientist doing rigorous evidence-based science, and she is interested in how Chinese scientists and authorities dealt with the virus before and after the outbreak. As for her findings, there is a need for rigorous investigation. The evidence for the laboratory leak is circumstantial, as is the evidence for a natural outbreak. For the natural theory, we are dealing in probability: of bats flying to markets. Therefore, no conclusive evidence one way or the other. Dr. Chan does not take the attitude of a GB News hack or posters: “oh, it’s all too much of a coincidence.” She is looking for conclusive evidence and is not tainted by bigotry or political posturing. She is clearly not interested in the GB News hack’s question on the credibility of the WHO. Her 3 minute answer reasserted the need for independent investigation, not ‘’No!” as the GBN hack assert elsewhere. Journalism like this is as credible as the Sun, the Express and all other tabloids. Scientists like Dr. Chan deserve better! One question remains: how was this virus manufactured? In spite of the hack’s attempt, there is not conclusive answer to this.
    1
  2. Coincidence is not causation.
    1
  3. OK then, you're the genius: provide the evidence. Isn't that the point; that Dr. Chan is unable to find conclusive evidence. You can either support evidence-based science, or you can go the way of the Nazi propagandist: ''if China says it didn't leak it, then that just proves it did.''
    1
  4.  @MsJackcool69  Where is the evidence? When a climate change denying Tory peer cannot find conclusive evidence, perhaps it's harder to come by. Perhaps in ten, twenty, fifty years it will be revealed. Explain what are the smoking guns ....
    1