Comments by "robs2020" (@sbor2020) on "'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up" video.

At least you think Hitler was more a threat, which makes you a "moderate" by the GB Numpteriate standards!
2
@davidmiller4078 Explain, if Blair is Trotsky, who is Stalin, and who is Lenin?
2
@robertthomas3777 🤡🤡
1
@catherinedart4777 Pathetic.
1
Two-tier Tommy and his underlings?
1
What has he said that is evidence of a willingness to go to war with Russia?
1
There are no credible reports that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is calling for a war with Russia. This claim seems to misinterpret his stance on Ukraine. Starmer has condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine, stating that Russia started the conflict and Ukraine has a right to defend itself. However, he has clarified that the UK does not seek direct conflict with Russia. His focus is on supporting Ukraine through military aid, not provoking a broader war.
1
@dennisr476 Come on Putinista, explain with verifiable evidence to support any claim you make. I believe it's important to base arguments on facts rather than engaging in distractions.
1
@paulmason329 Starmer is the PM, Liz Truss is not. Get your facts right.
1
@paulmason329 OK Mr Pendantic, Liz Truss is not Foreign Secretary. Don't be tiresome, and explain with verifiable evidence to support the claim that Starmer wants war with Russia.
1
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
1
@labouraredangerous Why Stasi? Does Starmer keep records of smells of his opponents? You are a 🤡 just repeating the words of your fellow right-wing numptariate. Conformity! Your idea of patriotism is superficial, dogmatic, and harmful to the broader values of freedom and individuality that the countries of the UK stand for. So yes, you are a 🤡
1
Well done for being "liked". However neither you nor any of those who "liked" you comment - over 1,000 - can provide a shred of evidence to support this claim, can you?
1
@jeanbrown8295 Obvious???? Evidence!!!!
1
@spencergregory8049 "Just because it comes from 'your side' doesn’t mean you should believe everything you read. This is a classic example of someone semi-educated spreading misinformation. You have no evidence to support your claims. I’ll ask you to supply the evidence, but I doubt you’ll reply. You people just keep posting the misinformation, unaware it seems that you’re being preyed upon by populists.
1
@chrisstokie2361 Yes, I knew that would be your evidence: a clipped interview. Did you see the full context of that interview in which Emily Maitlis asks him the question? Of course you didn't, your mind is just swimming in the right-wing social media manipulation. Starmer: Davos Maitlis: Why? Starmer: Because Westminster is too constrained. And you know, it’s closed and we’re not having meaning … Once you get out of Westminster, whether it is Davos or anywhere else, you can actually engage with people you can see working with in the future. Westminster is just a tribal shouting tribal place . Is Starmer's answer: *evidence that we're being ruled from Davos now, not Westminster_ ?
1
@chrisstokie2361 OK so your first piece of evidence didn't really count because it is based on a clipped video to manipulate people into thinking Starmer is pro-WEF and anti-UK. You right-wingers whinge about the "Westminster bubble" but when Starmer makes the same point, you claim that the WEF is ruling the UK. Ludicrous. Once again, what specific evidence can you provide to support the claim that the UK government is being directly controlled by the WEF? When you have provided the evidence, you can also tell give us the answer to my follow-up question. How do the mechanisms of democracy and parliamentary accountability in the UK align or conflict with the idea that a non-governmental organization like the WEF is ruling the country ?
1
@chrisstokie2361 No! I didn't vote for Labour, or support them. Terrible PM, so far. You however made an unstantiated claim, So back it up! With the evidence you have, is there really a need to attack me personally? Keep to the issue. Do NOT divert, distract, divide!
1
@chrisstokie2361 OK so your first piece of evidence didn't really count because it is based on a clipped video to influence people into thinking Starmer is pro-WEF and anti-UK. You people whinge about the "Westminster bubble" but when Starmer makes the same point, you claim that the WEF is ruling the UK. Ridiculous. Once again, what specific evidence can you provide to support the claim that the UK government is being directly controlled by the WEF?
1
@DeniseBond-cc9ce The living descendant of Harold Godwinson is a Polish bloke. Since Charles III is anointed by God, would you like to the Polish bloke - Marcin Zamoyski - to claim the the rightful throne of England? Why do we need rulers? Kings? Capitalist funded political parties? Isn't freedom more valuable, and can't we organise society without the existence of authoritarian structures? Will I get an intelligent answer?
1
@seritamaclellan1991 From the Numpterian's Book of Alternative Facts ?
1
@chrisstokie2361 You have absolutely no evidence other than citing a doctored clip you saw on social media. Neither can any of your right-wing brethren. This is when you admit that you have no evidence, and that your claim is totally unsubstantiated.
1
@chrisstokie2361 That is how capitalism could be ended, but you reactionaries are on the wrong side.
1
@chrisstokie2361 How did I insult you? And how is Brethren an insult? Is even right-wing an insult? Should I have said, over 1,200 "free-thinkers" that think exactly the same as you, without a shred of evidence to support such your claim . Anyway, enough of your attempts to divert, distract, and divide! It is not too late to provide evidence to substantiate your claim. Otherwise, admit you have nothing, zero, zip, zilch, nada .
1
@chrisstokie2361 Dezinformator.
1
@chrisstokie2361 You’re presenting claims without offering any verifiable evidence to support them. Could you provide credible sources for your statements? I believe it's important to base arguments on facts rather than engaging in distractions or emotional appeals.
1
@chrisstokie2361 What is this if it is not preaching: we're being ruled from Davos now, not Westminster ? Explain what you mean with evidence. Simple! This is basic, even before the follow-up question.
1
@chrisstokie2361 Good, thank you. Now do you have a source for this quote? Speech? Book? Where can I cross reference it? Schwab did say that the WEF "penetrate the cabinets", he was referring to alumni of the Young Leaders Program, including Trudeau. But creating international co-operation in an NGO is very different from your claim of control and "being ruled". So you are part-way there, just the source of the quote. Cheers.
1
@7pinky791 Why don't you provide some evidence for the claim that we're being ruled from Davos now, not Westminster ?
1
@chrisstokie2361 1.3k likes! Now, aren't you forgetting something? Like providing credible sources and verifiable evidence for your statements!
1
@htlein As I wrote on GB News post in October 2022: The Public Order Bill that is going through Parliament seeks to take away your freedom of assembly . No one took any notice . As I wrote, again on GB News post in December 2021: You can always demonstrate. Oh no, you won't be able to if the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is passed into law. If you do demonstrate, you could face a four-year prison sentence. GB News is not interested in this No one took any notice . People are only now taking notice when their freedom to demonstrate is now curtailed, but were not paying attention to the fact the previous government’s zealous attempts to crush environmental activism is now being used against political demonstration . Again, as I wrote in June 2021, again on GB News post: Because of class society, there is a need for dictators of some form, actual or corporate (economic, political or corporate media). There is a need to change the conditions of class divided society . _No one will take any notice_.
1
@chrisstokie2361 So you have given up finding concrete evidence to support you claim. So 1.3k like your conspiracist comment. In my opinion, the issue of creeping authoritarianism cannot be solely attributed to the World Economic Forum (WEF). While the WEF may seem shadowy, it functions primarily as an interest group for global capitalists. Isn’t the real problem global capitalism itself, rather than just this organisation? Capitalism prioritises profits over human and environmental needs. The problem with right-wing figures like Farage and Tice is that they tend to scapegoat élites while maintaining the existing economic system. This approach is similar to what Viktor Orbán does in Hungary, where he attracts oligarchs who promote capitalism at the expense of civil liberties and workers’ rights. This strategy of persuading working people to vote against their economic interests is the whole basis of economic liberty .
1
🤡🤡
1
You 🤡 speaks 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
1