Comments by "robs2020" (@sbor2020) on ""We Have A Communist Government" | Caller Barry REACTS To Labour's 2024 Budget" video.

Freedom is down Freedom for whom? Not everyone benefits from the privileges you enjoy – like multiple properties, private education, or private healthcare. Many people in the UK don’t have these options and may feel that these inequalities actually limit freedom, especially when essential services and opportunities aren't accessible to all. As we saw with 14 years of Tory government, when policies benefit only the wealthier portion of society, inequality grows, which can restrict overall freedom by creating barriers to advancement and opportunities for those less well-off. In a more equal society, everyone has a fairer chance to succeed, which ultimately strengthens freedom and opportunity across the board. A budget that seeks to address these disparities isn't necessarily bad; instead, it can aim to balance freedoms and resources so more people can pursue their goals and improve their quality of life.
13
@ojn8819cd know or no? Get it right if you are to call people stupid!
5
@jasonbuksh2958 Can't even get grammar right 🤣Can't even address my comments 🤣Resorts to football analogy 🤡🤣
4
@j3488 Indeed, recent laws introduced by the previous Conservative government – the Public Order Act and the Online Safety Act – have definitely raised concerns about free speech limits. The Public Order Act gives police more power to restrict protests deemed 'disruptive,' while the Online Safety Act increases online monitoring, which some argue threatens privacy and expression. Human rights groups like Amnesty have criticised these laws and are urging the current Labour government to reconsider or repeal them to protect free speech and the right to protest. It’s sparking a big debate on balancing public order and freedom! Interestingly, Boris Johnson the "exemplar of freedom" initiated both bills. An advocate of personal freedoms and less government intervention, he initiated both the Public Order Bill and the Online Safety Bill - legislation that many view as increasing state powers and oversight.
4
Here’s something to consider: If you don’t want to pay taxes, remember that taxes fund essential public services that benefit everyone, including you. Our roads, parks, libraries, and public transport systems all rely on taxpayer money. Imagine the world without these services! Taxes allow us to build infrastructure, create community spaces, and provide resources that everyone can access, whether or not they’re wealthy. When we pay taxes, we’re not just funding services for ourselves but contributing to the collective well-being of society. So, if you use these services, it makes sense to help support them through your taxes. If you don't want to pay, then leave this country!
2
@TheEverest72 Is that an argument for not funding services through taxation?
2
@janebruce6625 It's concerning to see calls for exclusion reminiscent of 1933 when the Nazis targeted and expelled groups deemed "enemies of the state." History shows us that such actions can lead to severe consequences.
2
@robertrae4867 First of all, what analogy did I make? Secondly, how does your question logically follow? Clearly, you not a thinker but a cheerleader for the radical right.
1
@ramalama9650 I don't respond to sweeping generalisations made by conspiracists because you lack evidence and fail to consider the complexity of the issues at hand. You oversimplify reality and dismiss the nuanced perspectives that are necessary for a meaningful discussion.
1
@lyndamayfield1913 As I wrote on GB News post in October 2022: The Public Order Bill that is going through Parliament seeks to take away your freedom of assembly . No one took any notice . As I wrote, again on GB News post in December 2021: You can always demonstrate. Oh no, you won't be able to if the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is passed into law. If you do demonstrate, you could face a four-year prison sentence. GB News is not interested in this No one took any notice . People are only now taking notice when their freedom to demonstrate is now curtailed, but were not paying attention to the fact the previous government’s zealous attempts to crush environmental activism is now being used against political demonstration . Again, as I wrote in June 2021, again on GB News post: Because of class society, there is a need for dictators of some form, actual or corporate (economic, political or corporate media). There is a need to change the conditions of class divided society . No one will take any notice .
1
@chrismaddock5790 I totally get where you're coming from, especially if it feels like the current budget may be discouraging individual success and comfort. However, it’s worth considering that a balanced budget, even one with certain tax increases, doesn’t necessarily mean punishing hard work or success. Historically, there are strong examples where raising taxes in strategic ways has actually strengthened economies, improved public services, and fostered a society where more people can succeed. Take, for example, the New Deal in the U.S. during the 1930s, where increased taxes on the wealthiest funded infrastructure projects and job programs. This approach not only pulled the country out of the Great Depression but laid the groundwork for long-term economic resilience. Similarly, in post-1945 Britain, higher taxes supported the creation of the welfare state, introducing universal healthcare, education, and social security. These initiatives enabled generations to access quality healthcare and education, empowering more people to lead comfortable lives. In Sweden, progressive tax policies have consistently funded high-quality public services like healthcare and education, contributing to a strong middle class. And in post-reunification Germany, tax policies helped bring East Germany up to a comparable standard with the West, leading to a unified, prosperous country. These successful examples demonstrate that a commitment to a better society for all can harness taxation to fuel inclusive growth and societal progress. These weren’t quick fixes, but they eventually helped create a more secure and fair society. It’s fair to be critical and demand transparency in how funds are used. Taxes should genuinely work for the public’s benefit, addressing long-term needs like healthcare, education, and infrastructure that will pay off over time. And yes, people need to see that their hard work can still lead to a stable, comfortable life. That’s a fundamental part of trust in the system. While it might not feel like it today, the hope is that by strengthening the social fabric, these investments will help build a foundation for a fairer, more resilient society. It’s not a fast track, and the government has to deliver real results to earn back people’s confidence. But ideally, these efforts aim to create a future where success isn't limited to a few but accessible to anyone willing to work for it – without losing sight of those who need help along the way. And take it from me as someone who neither supports nor voted for this Labour government.
1
@rebeccaconlon9743 Didn't you vote to strip people of their freedom of movement in 2016? Anyway, you should read Isaiah Berlin's "Two Concepts of Liberty" to understand freedom from and freedom to.
1
@jackjohnson6230 The idea that progressive taxation is about punishing success misunderstands its purpose. It's not about targeting people who work hard but about addressing systemic inequalities. A significant portion of wealth at the top isn't a result of individual hard work but rather inherited wealth or profits generated by the labour of others. Workers who produce value often don't see a proportionate share of the wealth they create. Taxes help fund essential services and infrastructure that enable everyone to have a fair shot at success, not just those who start off wealthy.
1
@jackjohnson6230 Also the idea that most tax revenue goes to people who don't work is a common misconception. In reality, a significant portion of taxes funds infrastructure, healthcare, education, and services that benefit everyone, including roads, public transport, emergency services, and more. Additionally, many people who rely on social support are either working low-wage jobs, unable to work due to disability, or temporarily between jobs. Rather than supporting “dole bludgers,” social safety nets help ensure that all members of society can contribute and thrive, which ultimately strengthens the economy and community as a whole.
1
Also the idea that most tax revenue goes to people who don't work is a common misconception. In reality, a significant portion of taxes funds infrastructure, healthcare, education, and services that benefit everyone, including roads, public transport, emergency services, and more. Additionally, many people who rely on social support are either working low-wage jobs, unable to work due to disability, or temporarily between jobs. Rather than supporting “dole-bludgers,” social safety nets help ensure that all members of society can contribute and thrive, which ultimately strengthens the economy and community as a whole.
1
@jackjohnson6230 Ah yes, the classic trope – blame society's problems on the most vulnerable while turning a blind eye to corporate welfare, tax evasion, and inherited wealth. Funny how the “hard-working wealth creators” never seem to include nurses, teachers, or anyone who actually keeps society running. If life is all about choices, maybe we should start by choosing to tax billionaires properly instead of punching down at people struggling to get by.
1
@jackjohnson6230 Reactionary politics conveniently shifts blame to vulnerable individuals for systemic issues, reducing complex social and economic realities to simplistic moral judgments that treat wealth as proof of virtue and poverty as a personal failing – making reactionaries the least credible voices on accountability.
1
@Wizard-c3q So you don't think Brexit has made the country poorer by the electorate making a bade decision?
1
@m0o0n0i0r True, but it's worth noting that since 2008, average house prices in the UK have increased significantly, around 60-70% depending on the region. Many people are just trying to keep their homes' value up in a volatile market. How could people have 'wised up'? What party should they have voted for to achieve lower house prices and higher wages? It’s tough when the economy pushes prices higher while wages haven’t kept pace!
1