Comments by "robs2020" (@sbor2020) on ""Puritanical BULLYING" In Starmer's Two-Tier POLICE STATE Says Bernadette Spofforth" video.

  1. The were made by the governments you lot voted for. Public Order Act 2023, and the Police, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022.
    3
  2. Incitement is not the same as "having the wrong opinion". Surely you are clever enough to understand that.
    2
  3. Which government passed the Online Safety Act 2023 under which Spofforth was charged?
    2
  4. Don't be so unpatriotic, similar psychological techniques have been used by the British Army, particularly during high-profile conflicts. For example, during "The Troubles" in Northern Ireland, psychological methods were often employed to break down detainees' resistance.
    1
  5.  @bettyswollocks4255  Read again. Understand what the Stasi is. Understand the British Army also has similar torture tectniques to the Stasi. I am not your reading teacher!
    1
  6.  @bettyswollocks4255  I'll tell my ex-students, one of whom works for the European Court of Justice in Den Haag.
    1
  7. ​ @bettyswollocks4255  Maybe so, but there is so much nonsense here. BTW, do you now know what Sir "Ministerium für Staatssicherheit" Starmer is?
    1
  8. ​ @MrTudwud  I copied and tweeted. I put if this is true and and then I went outside and left my phone … Spofforth claimed to have copied and pasted a fake name, supposedly belonging to an immigrant on the MI5 watchlist, from a 'reliable source.’ However, this information turned out to be untrue, and no such source could be verified. She then asserted that the information only went viral a minute later and didn’t delete the tweet for another six hours, suggesting she knew what she was doing. She could not, I believe, provide the "reliable source". Such a contradictory defence, though she was released without charge due to insufficient evidence. If you are saying there is no evidence for incitement, then I have got some magic beans I could sell you!
    1