Comments by "robs2020" (@sbor2020) on "“Labour Actually HATE Voters” Government’s ‘Sin Tax’ Raid To Hit Pubs, Drinkers And Smokers" video.

  1.  @Starmerispureevil  This is a textbook example of Orwellian language. "Islamawareness" is a manipulative way of rebranding "Islamophobia" to make bigotry sound acceptable or even positive. It distorts reality by downplaying the prejudice inherent in Islamophobia and tries to frame it as something neutral or educational. This kind of language stops people from thinking critically and recognising discrimination for what it really is. It’s a way to mask intolerance, which is why it’s so dangerous and despicable.
    2
  2. I know you were being Islamophobic, but if the government were to tax Church of England land then this would generate a sizeable amount in tax revenue. The Church owns about 260,000 acres and if the land were worth £10 billion, a 1% tax could generate £100 million annually.
    1
  3. You’re presenting a claim without offering any verifiable evidence to support it. Could you provide credible sources for this statement?
    1
  4.  @Kentish9494  For one thing, I am not a Labour supporter, and didn't vote for them. Secondly, why do you numpteriate never provide evidence? Because you have nothing , but conspiratorial nonsense. If you think the WEF controls and rules the UK government, you are an absolute right-wing loon.
    1
  5.  @Kentish9494  ​ For one thing, I am not a Labour supporter, and didn't vote for them. Secondly, why don't you provide specific evidence that the UK has a "WEF government"? So without petty name-calling, let's stick to the facts and substantiate your claim. Simple!
    1
  6. EVIDENCE!!
    1
  7. A Sun reader connects two dots!
    1
  8.  @DanRyan-v5y  As a Sun reader you revert to type: a playground return "Takes one to know one! Ha, ha!" Any more Islamophobic slurs? Or are you going to support claims with evidence?
    1
  9. Yes, government is bad for, so why is there no discussion of anarchy? In an anarchist society, there would be no centralised government or formal hierarchy. Instead, communities would self-organise through voluntary cooperation, mutual aid, and decentralised decision-making. People would collectively manage resources and services through local assemblies, cooperatives, or federations, with a focus on equality and direct participation. Dispute resolution would be based on consensus, restorative justice, or community-based systems rather than state-imposed laws. The goal is a society based on autonomy, freedom, and solidarity without coercive authority.
    1
  10. For those who think one Lord donor to Labour equals corruption, consider this: the Conservative Party has received millions from Russian-linked figures like Lubov Chernukhin and Alexander Temerko, who have ties to Putin’s regime. Major fossil fuel investors like Michael Hintze and Ian Taylor, as well as offshore media tycoons like Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail) and Lord Ashcroft, have also funnelled large sums into Tory coffers. If we're talking corruption, it's important to look at the bigger picture across all parties.
    1
  11. "destructive demographic" = that's a new dog-whistle. I should compile a dictionary: An Islamophobe's Thesaurus .
    1
  12. What is "middle class wine"?
    1
  13. The culture war is only there to distract us from the class war .
    1