Comments by "Morgan King" (@MorganKing95) on "Top 10 Supporting Actors That Stole The Show" video.

  1. Did you watch the intro? No antagonists permitted
    42
  2. Watch the intro
    8
  3. No antagonists permitted
    5
  4. Antagonist
    5
  5. +Christian Manoilov No antagonists!
    4
  6. No antagonists permitted
    3
  7. Dusty Songs​ I'm stupid? You're the one who obviously didn't watch the intro. And we speak English here.
    3
  8. Dusty Songs You're just mad because I'm right
    3
  9. No antagonists permitted
    3
  10. No antagonists permitted
    3
  11. Antagonist
    3
  12.  @haleylynn1369  If they're gonna be included solely because they're women and/or POC, and not because of actual merit, then yes, that's radical feminism Have you ever considered that the reason they aren't here is simply because they didn't steal the show? Of course you haven't, because you're all "Down with the patriarchy!"
    3
  13. +Osvaldo Jimenez No antagonists!
    3
  14. Hadn't come out yet, but I definitely agree. It seems like it's mostly the supporting characters in Tarantino's movies that often receive the most attention and acclaim
    3
  15. "If you have to shoot; shoot, don't talk!"
    2
  16. +Muffin Top cough no antagonists permitted cough
    2
  17. Sandra Schmidt Criteria: no antagonists
    2
  18. Villains are not permitted
    2
  19. Because antagonists are not permitted on this list
    2
  20. If you're talking about the Joker, then he's not elegible because of the "no antagonists" criteria
    2
  21. +TaxiDriver 101 Because practically every spot will be taken by antagonists since they tend to be most popular anyway
    2
  22. +Miss Cellaneous Somebody hasn't learned to watch intros
    2
  23. +Jack Anderson Did you watch the intro? No antagonists!
    2
  24. Except in "Ray" where he was the star
    2
  25. Didn't you watch the intro? No antagonists!
    2
  26. +Juan Camilo Albarracin No antagonists!
    2
  27. +PrinceTrexus Leo was hammy and whiny and reminded me of an overgrown teen with a superiority complex, and his death scene looked staged. I can't even remember any good gestures, viewpoints, or tableaus from him. Compared to villain performances like Marlon Brando in "A Streetcar Named Desire", Heath Ledger in "The Dark Knight", Anthony Perkins in "Psycho", Daniel Day-Lewis in 'Gangs of New York", Joe Pesci in "GoodFellas", Ralph Fiennes in "Schindler's List", Forest Whitaker in "The Last King of Scotland", and J.K. Simmons in "Whiplash", Leo doesn't grasp villain portrayals.
    2
  28. You mentioned a bunch of antagonists here
    2
  29. He was the main character in those
    1
  30. No antagonists permitted
    1
  31. Brando is the main character
    1
  32. Callum Smart I think they are quite equal in that movie
    1
  33. He was born in Oklahoma though
    1
  34. He was the antagonist
    1
  35. The two people you wanted are antagonists
    1
  36. 1. If antagonists were permitted, then almost every entry would consist of them since they tend to steal the show anyway, and the list could just have been a "Top 10 movie antagonists who stole the show" 2. It's Tommy Lee Jones, not Cooper
    1
  37. He was the antagonist
    1
  38. No antagonists permitted
    1
  39. +paul daniel Richard Harris was better
    1
  40. Daniel Day-Lewis definitely didn't have his show stolen
    1
  41. Navneet Ojha I know, but in order to steal the show, you kinda have to make a better impact than the other actors, and DDL was by the far the one who made the biggest impact
    1
  42. If you're talking about Robin Hood, then he is the main antagonist, and they're excluded
    1
  43. No antagonists permitted on this list
    1
  44. Wasn't he an antagonist?
    1
  45. He was the hidden antagonist
    1
  46. No antagonists permitted on this list
    1
  47. +zoopertrooper Acting abilities are not measured by how much of a chameleon you are
    1
  48. +C.C No antagonists
    1
  49. +3abdo No antagonists! (Plus that I found him hammy as fuck)
    1
  50. She's played a lot of lead roles too
    1
  51. He's arguably the antagonist
    1
  52. No antagonists permitted
    1
  53. Antagonist
    1
  54. Brando and Pacino didn't get the show stolen in "The Godfather"
    1
  55. Nate​ Al Pacino's performance in "The Godfather part II" made a lot bigger impact As for the Genie, I think they excluded animated films
    1
  56. Antagonist
    1
  57. EgyptianMinor I’m impressed that you actually used a book source instead of the internet, but even then I stand by my word. If my choice is to use books that are specifically meant for theatre concepts (in this case protagonist, antagonist, etc.) and an encyclopedia or dictionary that is meant for anyone, I’ll definitely go for the former. Similarly, if I want to learn about method acting and I have a choice between using the internet or to read Lee Strasberg’s personal notes, I will not even consider going for the former. And if you have to be all linguistic with me, then the etymology of “protagonist” is “protos” (first) and “agonistes” (Combatant, pleader, actor), while “antagonist” comes from “anti” (against) and “agonistes” (combatant, pleader, actor). “Deuteragonist” and “Tritagonist” come from “deuter” (second) and “trit” (third) respectively.
    1
  58. +Captain Mutato He didn't really steal the show from Daniel Day-Lewis
    1
  59. Captain Mutato It's pretty clear who has made the biggest impact out of the two
    1
  60. Captain Mutato I think that's more the direction of the film; it's not uncommon to deliberately make a character dominant. As soon as Daniel Day-Lewis is allowed to be himself again, he is the one who dominates Paul Dano. Plus that Eli Sunday is pretty static and one-dimentional compared to Daniel Plainview
    1
  61. Captain Mutato From an acting perspective, Paul Dano simply doesn't bring anything that hasn't been seen before. The only time he really shines is the church scene, but even then, speeches with that power has already been seen in movies like "The Great Dictator" (Charlie Chaplin), "On the Waterfront" (Karl Malden, whom also played a priest), and "Scent of a Woman" (Al Pacino), and he doesn't really use his voice correctly. I've watched the film a handful of times, but Daniel Day-Lewis is still the one who's leaving the most impression for me
    1
  62. Antagonists are not permitted
    1
  63. +JG95 Did you watch the intro? No antagonists!
    1
  64. He's arguably the antagonist, so he's excluded
    1
  65. The definition of an antagonist is someone who opposes to the protagonist
    1
  66. No antagonists permitted
    1
  67. Banned from this list because he's an antagonist
    1
  68. He is considered the main character (I know Michael Corleone has the most screen time, but Vito Corleone is still the main character)
    1
  69. No, you're the antagonist. You have no access
    1
  70. No villains allowed
    1
  71. He was the villain
    1
  72. no antagonists permitted
    1
  73. They say it's a list for another day, so let's just hope it will come out some day
    1
  74. No antagonists permitted
    1
  75. Well, Al Pacino is the one who made the biggest impact in the sequel, so I wouldn't say that De Niro stole the show
    1
  76. No antagonists permitted
    1
  77. Rashaan Holloway That's called self-righteousness, and it's a typical trait of antagonists. In addition, Fletcher only trains his students out of selfish reasons, he manipulates them, he verbally abuse them, and he is clearly meant to represent the abusive teacher the society doesn't want
    1
  78. Kevin Spacey played a villain
    1
  79. Tom Hanks*
    1
  80. no antagonists permitted
    1
  81. He's not very much of an antagonist to Henry Hill though
    1
  82. He was the antagonist
    1
  83. Because he's an antagonist, and they're disqualified
    1
  84. deeke471​ Main characters can still be antagonists
    1
  85. deeke471​​ "Verbal Kint/Keyzer Soze is the primary antagonist of the 1995 Academy Award-winning film 'The Usual Suspects"-villains wiki Besides, "GoodFellas" is a movie with no clear antagonist, while "The Usual Suspects" has police interrogations and police officers trying to solve a crime
    1
  86. The entire list would be consisting of antagonists then since they mostly steal the show anyway
    1
  87. No antagonists permitted on this list
    1
  88. No problem :)
    1
  89. Would definitely make my list
    1
  90. He's a villain and mostly considered the main character at the same time
    1
  91. Because antagonists are not permitted on this list
    1
  92. no antagonists permitted
    1
  93. +Max Dostor I definitely agree with you on the Oscar thing, but since he was the male lead (and is somewhat of an antagonist as well), he cannot be on this list
    1
  94. Billing is a marketing tool or a formality. If you're a much more established actor than the main actor, then you will get billed before him. Marlon Brando and Gene Hackman for example were billed in that order in "Superman" despite Christopher Reeves being the main actor
    1
  95. No antagonists allowed
    1
  96. No antagonists!
    1
  97. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  98. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  99. Somebody didn't watch the intro
    1
  100. +aceventuraify No antagonists!
    1
  101. +Drake Chisam Somebody hasn't learned to watch the intro
    1
  102. No antagonists allowed
    1
  103. +tony montana No antagonists!
    1
  104. +Stadvis Somebody didn't watch the intro
    1
  105. +Brian Fogel No antagonists!
    1
  106. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  107. Watch the intro! No antagonists!
    1
  108. Here we go again with the radical feminism!
    1
  109. No antagonists
    1
  110. Somebody didn't watch the intro
    1
  111. No antagonists allowed, so no Joker!
    1
  112. +LIV C10 Leo: no antagonists!!! (Plus that he was hammy as hell)
    1
  113. +ElliottGreen02' No antagonists!
    1
  114. +Michael Kitchens No antagonists!
    1
  115. +joe lozano No antagonists!
    1
  116. No antagonists!
    1
  117. +Shibashish Choudhury Watch the intro! No antagonists!
    1
  118. No antagonists!
    1
  119. No antagonists!
    1
  120. +Arthur Cook No antagonists!
    1
  121. +8 Ball Maniac Superstar Bardem and Simmons played antagonists.
    1
  122. +8 Ball Maniac Superstar If you're gonna comment on this video, then at least follow the criteria
    1
  123. No antagonists!
    1
  124. I guess you didn't watch the intro since they clearly said "We're excluding antagonists" (and yes, Norton's character in "Primal Fear" is the overall antagonist of the film since he's revealed to be the culprit after all)
    1
  125. No antagonists!
    1
  126. You also had one job to check the criteria; no antagonists!!!
    1
  127. +Lisa D Nah, nobody can steal the show from Daniel Day-Lewis
    1
  128. No antagonists!
    1
  129. You didn't watch the intro, did you? No antagonists!
    1
  130.  @acapavlovic8524  Because from the movies' point of views, the morally upright would be the antagonists. "Antagonist" isn't synonymous with "villain"; it means the one who opposes the protagonist (and the protagonist is the point-of-view character)
    1
  131. No antagonists!
    1
  132. +Habla Sabla Watch the intro
    1
  133. +Habla Sabla You idiot! I said "watch the intro" so that you could learn that they excluded antagonists!
    1
  134. They said no antagonists. There's a difference!
    1
  135. +Blake Pavey Antagonists tend to steal the show anyway, and there are a bunch of lists already dedicated to them
    1
  136. No antagonists!
    1
  137. They clearly said it in the intro
    1
  138. +Mohamed Fadel No antagonists
    1
  139. +Mohamed Fadel No antagonists/villains allowed on this list
    1
  140. No antagonists allowed
    1
  141. No antagonists!
    1
  142. +christopher rembert No antagonists!
    1
  143. +Marina Dzhavadyan No antagonists
    1
  144. No antagonists
    1
  145. +Daniel Retamal He was hammy as hell and had the personality of an overgrown teen
    1
  146. No antagonists!
    1
  147. +Tee Smith No antagonists!
    1
  148. The characters in "GoodFellas" are the protagonists from the perspective the movie shows its angle from. Do you even know what "antagonist" means? It definitely doesn't mean "villain"
    1
  149.  @ashoikiesaunders721  Query: what is an antagonist?
    1
  150.  @ashoikiesaunders721  Yes, the adversary of the protagonist. And what kind of person was the protagonist Henry Hill? He was someone who said he always wanted to be a gangster, who let gangsters beat up postmen, who pointed guns towards the temple of wounded people, who laughed at Tommy's sadistic stories, who got arrested, and who was selling drugs. Tommy really isn't opposed to that since he's a violent psychopath from the same Mafia family. Henry becoming an informant for the FBI is on one hand not really different from an antagonist reforming, but since Henry is the point-of-view character and he's obviously amoral and part of a universe that glorifies violence, drugs, and prostitution, then it's more comparable to someone joining the bad guys since the police are the antagonists to the Mafia. Of course I know that "GoodFellas" is meant to be ironic; they're all violent criminals, but from their perspective and the angle the film has chosen, they're the good guys, so it's ironic because their definition of "goodness" is the opposite of the general definition, and their views of the word only appear when looking at the twisted world they're part of. Bringing up the real-life Tommy DeSimone is irrelevant since it all depends on what angle the film chooses. Hitler is the protagonist of "Der Untergang" because of the angle the film is shown from even though Hitler is more commonly portrayed as the antagonist in media where the protagonist represents the opposition to the Nazi party
    1
  151.  @ashoikiesaunders721  No, that just makes Henry someone who joins the bad guys because the movie's angle is that the Mafia represent the heroes and the police the bad guys. If you think that being a protagonist means to be the morally upright one, then you're an imbecile (and probably a libtard too. I bet you believe that George Lloyd was a hero and the police the bad guys, despite the black people actually being the bad guys since the Western civilization was not built upon the principles of black people, but the white males)
    1
  152.  @ashoikiesaunders721  I knew that you were just some politically correct person who thinks that "protagonist" means "good guy" when that really isn't the case. An obvious proof that you haven't read about "deconstruction"
    1
  153. +Julius Eckmann No antagonists!
    1
  154. No antagonists! (plus that Leo was hammy as hell. He's simply too feminine and baby-faced to be taken seriously as a villain)
    1
  155. You mentioned a lot of antagonists here
    1
  156. No antagonists!
    1
  157. He's considered a supporting character in the sense that Luke is the point-of-view character and the one who goes through an arc, so Han Solo's function in the story is related to Luke's character arc
    1
  158.  @Solo_Traveling  What is the additional title to the original Star Wars? A New Hope. Who represents that hope? Certainly not Han Solo
    1
  159.  @Solo_Traveling  Of course he is, you brainless bimbo! He's the protagonist!!!! He's the one who goes through the Jedi training! He's the one who has a direct connection to Darth Vader!! Everyone would be doomed if it wasn't for him!!!! End of story! I don't want anymore bullshit replies from you!!
    1
  160.  @Solo_Traveling  What did I say? I don't want to hear anything from you!
    1
  161.  @Solo_Traveling  Did I say you could talk?
    1
  162.  @Solo_Traveling  Mentally challenged people have no right to speak. You're also just embarrassing yourself further; that's why you should just be locked-up in an asylum
    1
  163.  @Solo_Traveling  You insulted me by not taking the discussion seriously and not being of a cultural elite. Why can't you be more like Lindsay Ellis?
    1
  164.  @Solo_Traveling  The "arguments" you presented was not taking the discussion seriously; they were the equivalent of seeing a small child writing a book report
    1
  165.  @Solo_Traveling  You don't need to write an essay to not having the critiquing skills of a child
    1
  166.  @Solo_Traveling  I am civilized with those who take discussions seriously, are of a cultural elite, and give me real arguments
    1
  167.  @Solo_Traveling  Good for you, but I'm only looking for the best and don't think people from outside the cultural elite belong in the practice of art criticism, simply because they're causing bad influence and are pissing all over David Hume and Roger Ebert's graves, disgracing their legacy
    1
  168.  @Solo_Traveling  YouTube has multiple movie critics available, such as Doug Walker, Lindsay Ellis, Big Joel, Schaffrillas Productions, Jenny Nicholson, and Musical Hell, so YouTube isn't just YouTube and therefore not an excuse. What David Hume's got to do with this? Multiple things! If you've actually have read "The standard of taste" (which you obviously haven't), you'll know that his main philosophy was to present requirements for the art critic in order to have the authority to say what's good or bad art, and that we should listen to him in order go get a satisfactory art community . You on the other hand are breaking the rules of recognizing the artistic aspects in the piece of art by not knowing what a point of view character is, the rule of being experienced and well-trained which you clearly aren't, and having common sense which you lack since you're not very intelligent. You're also obviously not of a cultural elite which David Hume was. See? You can't even read relevant literature!
    1
  169.  @Solo_Traveling  Doing a critique includes analyzing a piece of art and positioning yourself against the consensus and established standard, and that's what you're doing by a analyzing Star Wars and positioning yourself against the consensus of Luke being the PoV character. In other words, you're a critic Being of a cultural elite includes being critical to other people of the same field and practice, and margalizing those who are from the outside and are infecting the perfect world the cultural elite is striving for. I'm looking down on you so that I can give my full love and attention to those who actually matter, for example Lindsay Ellis. Similarly, me and my associates discovered that our University was bleeding money and trying to shut down the theatre program, so what we did was convincing them to cut one staff shorter in the history program and shutting down several insignificant master programs, all so that we could survive and grow stronger. We also convinced our government to shut down an Opera organization so that we could use their locations for our theatre. Long live the cultural elite!
    1
  170.  @Solo_Traveling  No, I'm serious. And what's wrong with embracing the cultural elite and those who actually care about art and have worked hard for it?
    1
  171. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  172. Nobody can steal the show from Marlon Brando
    1
  173. +Crimson Sky Watch the intro
    1
  174. +Jazz G NO ANTAGONISTS!
    1
  175. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  176. No antagonists!
    1
  177. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  178. +michael winkler Leo was over-the-top and both looked and sounded like an overgrown teen, and his subtext was non-existent. Yelling doesn't automatically make a performance great.
    1
  179. You really should watch the intro first just to find out the criteria
    1
  180. No antagonists!
    1
  181. +Jawf94 Supporting characters don't need to be those characters with a screen time of 15 minutes and lower; the deuteragonist is considered a supporting character simply because he/she affects the protagonist's goal and development.
    1
  182. No antagonists allowed
    1
  183. No antagonists!
    1
  184. +Dc watcher He's the main character, and if you're gonna throw in the "screen time" argument at me, then you obviously don't understand the movie
    1
  185. No antagonists!
    1
  186.  @shenard6222  Did you watch the intro?
    1
  187. He was hammy as hell. Plus, no antagonists allowed here
    1
  188. To me, both are foreigners, and Rylance is considered one of the most talented stage actors of his generation. Theatre is a medium too, you know!
    1
  189. +Miguel Lee Antagonist
    1
  190. +Sam Kresil Well, well, well. Isn't it the same guy who tried to disgrace Lee Strasberg's name?
    1
  191. +Sam Kresil In WatchMojo's video for "top method actors", you tried to disgrace Strasberg's name by contributing with the same misconceptions and misleading information that method actors and academics have fought against for God knows how long.
    1
  192. +Sam Kresil I named my account after him because I felt I was the only one in my environments who had actually read Strasberg's notes and theories about method acting, and had to defend him from stupid conservative acting snobs who discredit him based on misconceptions people like you spew out. It reached its peak last year when I had to write an entire bachelor thesis to clear up misconceptions my professors believed in
    1
  193. No antagonists!
    1
  194. +Nikola Mudronja No antagonists!
    1
  195. +TheDaveMaybe Tommy DeVito was not an antagonist to the characters in "GoodFellas"; everybody was bad there, so the antagonists would either be the police or rivalling mobsters.
    1
  196. No antagonists!
    1
  197. +Ensy No antagonists!
    1
  198. +Adolfo Pena No antagonists!
    1
  199. No antagonists!
    1
  200. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  201. Leonardo isn't eligible since he played an antagonist
    1
  202. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  203. +Carolina Ureña No antagonists!
    1
  204. Michael may have the most screen time, but Vito is the point-of-view character and the one the intrigues are connected to. Let's break it down: - What's the main function of Vito? He's the Don of the Corleone family, the biggest Mafia family in the city, and the one everyone comes to for advice or deal with a lethal business. However, the other Dons have grown jealous despite Vito wanting to live in peace. - What's the inciting incident? Vito refuses to buy drugs from Sollozzo because it can ruin his contacts with the police and politicians. This refusal leads to Vito getting almost assassinated, and it's first then that Michael decides to be there for his family (he's literally supporting them). - Michael goes out on his own to kill Sollozzo and McCluskey to avenge his father, and he then starts a war. This tension however is resolved when Sonny gets murdered and Vito calls for a truce and a compromise between him and the other families. - The other families are convinced that Vito is growing weaker and won't live much longer, but that Michael is someone that will make the Corleone family stay on top. Vito predicts this and gives Michael this information. The climax is a direct result of Vito dying and the Corleone family thinking two steps forward when they kill the other Dons before they can even carry out any conspiracy against Michael. The overall resolution isn't Michael becoming Don per se, but the legacy of Vito being carried on further, as well as the Corleone family winning the "war". Michael being a family outsider is also more of a subplot and not something that has a connection to the other families wanting to weaken the Corleone family; it's more comparable to an army getting a new ally, but then the ally gets too much attention for what narrative function he serves. Overall, Vito is always present even when he's absent, and his function moves the plot forward You could potentially remove Michael from the story and still have a cohesive narrative, but remove Vito and you really don't have a plot. Michael really is a supporting character; his function is to help Vito come to peace with the other Dons (later win over them) so that the family remains powerful
    1
  205. 1. Antagonists are excluded 2. DiCaprio was like a whiny and over-the-top teenage bully who became a plantation owner, his accent was awful, his subtext is lacking, and he just doesn't have the authority to justify his character's status. Samuel Jackson had way better villain portrayal
    1
  206. +Joe S No antagonists
    1
  207. Probably one of the few actors who can also make me laugh when he's being angry
    1
  208. Because they explicitly said that they're excluding antagonists
    1
  209. +ilovefood Did you watch the intro?
    1
  210. Richard Kiel played an antagonist
    1
  211. +Carson Brown s No antagonists!!!
    1
  212. Antagonists are excluded if you would actually watch the intro
    1
  213. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  214. +Sebastian Caunin NO ANTAGONISTS! Pay attention to the freaking intro!
    1
  215. +Father Leo No antagonists!
    1
  216. No antagonists allowed!
    1
  217. No antagonists!
    1
  218. +Pavelescu Sabin-Stefan No antagonists!
    1
  219. Nobody can steal the show from Daniel Day-Lewis
    1
  220. +Giftson Johnson No antagonists! Pay attention!!!
    1
  221. Somebody didn't watch the intro
    1
  222. +Richárd Kéri Somebody hasn’t learned to check the intro
    1
  223. +Richárd Kéri They CLEARLY said "no antagonists" in the intro
    1