Comments by "0IIIIII" (@0IIIIII) on "The Guardian"
channel.
-
133
-
85
-
65
-
41
-
35
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
19
-
18
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FreekinEkin2 You are making a big deal out of trivial stuff. The Chilean Coup happened decades ago and is no longer relevant. The Iraq War is not evidence of corruption. How is it? How could Bush or the US have benefited from the Iraq War? The Iraq War costed trillions of dollars, US gives billions of dollars to Iraq every year, and all this was expected when the war started. Nobody started the war thinking the US would extort Iraq, take their oil, and leave with a tidy profit. That is a fantasy. Your claim that the Iraq War is proof of American corruption is flawed. And the thing is, even if you're correct, it's not even that damning. It doesn't make the US corrupt, it just makes the US imperfect.
You are also making a big deal out of lobbying. Lobbying is not bribery nor is it election fraud. Lobbyists cannot buy votes, and at the end of the day, politicians need votes to get in power, not lobbyist dollars. Therefore, politicians are still bound to honor their campaign promises and serve their constituents. They may be compromised by lobbying to an extent, but not to the extent that it ruins democracy or comes at everyone else's expense. Therefore your claim that lobbying makes the US corrupt is flawed.
You also have illogical doubts about the Index. The Corruptions Perceptions Index measures corruption in countries, and that's it. It does not list illusions of corruption, nor do countries have the ability to conceal widespread corruption. Therefore you attacks on this NGO are baseless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Looncan OK well if the term 3rd World doesn't suit you, call it something else. The point is, living under authoritarian and conservative culture breeds extremism, not studying a holy book. The Koran and the Bible are quite similar. In fact the Koran being newer, has less extreme restrictions on women, though it is still archaic by modern standards, the Bible is worse. So, if the Bible isn't inspiring wife-beating and such in the traditionally Christian countries, then it is something else, culture. Likewise, it is culture in the Middle East and other dictatorships that are inspiring this misogyny. Islam is irrelevant. They could all be Christians and the place would largely be the same, all else equal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1