Comments by "0IIIIII" (@0IIIIII) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.

  1. I liked Jedi Rocks, and the CGI is objectively better than puppets
    8
  2. Griner did not “break the law” in a fair way. The law was arbitrarily applied and she was sentenced to disproportionate amounts of punishment, purely as a hostage, and that’s assuming of course Russian officials didn’t plant it on her. As for Viktor Bout, he’s no longer a danger. His arms dealing business is now dried up.
    6
  3. It's the *Wilhelm Scream. Windhelm is a city in The Elder Scrolls V Skyrim. The Wilhelm Scream is named after a character in a movie, although it was used before that.
    5
  4. She was a hostage held by Russia for leverage. What she did, assuming she did it and wasn’t framed by the Russian authorities, doesn’t justify years in hard prison.
    5
  5. Tandem puppets are not better than CGI. You are blind lol
    4
  6. Yes, all American doctors are bought and paid for by...who exactly? Maybe some people believe that dick cheese is gross and there is no bad
    3
  7. The Joker sad that being pro-science, pro-democracy, and being pro-human rights makes you a liberal.
    3
  8. It is part of the government’s job to serve and protect the citizenry
    3
  9. Sylvia Rohge FGM unlike male circumcision causes real harm.
    2
  10. Jonathan Campos if both are bad then why is male circumcision legal? And FGM illegal?
    2
  11. The gun homicide rate and the general murder rates are higher in the US than in Western Europe.
    2
  12. Daniel Thawley Yeah I did think of that before.  
    2
  13. My doctor said I had Asperger's. I told him that he'd be having my foot in his face if he didn't retract.
    2
  14. Try working on yourself instead of blaming others
    2
  15. Successful Minds Zelda is my city
    2
  16. Buy a case
    2
  17. It’s regrettable but justified. Viktor Bout isn’t dangerous anymore
    2
  18. Less dickcheese on circumcised dicks
    1
  19. Jonathan Campos where is the proof that circumcised men enjoy sex less? If that were true then most American, South Korean, and Middle Eastern men all enjoy sex less. Seems farfetched. Regardless there are hygienic benefits which you acknowledge
    1
  20. Kragatar look at all these MGTOWs getting triggered over trivial shit lol
    1
  21. Kragatar dude...chill. Put down the pitchfork. Dude there is no proof that male circumcision on baby boys reduces the pleasure of sex. So chill
    1
  22. Kragatar is there any hygienic or aesthetic benefit to removing my earlobes? And can you guarantee me a successful surgery without any complications, since I am no longer an infant? If so, I will say yes. do you all come from the same place? Last year I heard the same analogy from different users on different videos.
    1
  23. Jonathan Campos yes but that is because as you say, they were circumcised later in life, as adults you mean, I assume. But when done on babies the procedure has no harm
    1
  24. Kragatar the risks are minute and the hygienic benefits are deemed worthwhile. Yes there is a teensy risk but it's so small among legit doctors that it's not statistically relevant. If that is the risk, and there was a tangible benefit and no downsides I'd accept your hypothetical.
    1
  25. Sylvia Rohge if that were true then why is it condemned and illegal yet male circumcision is not? I read sources on Wikipedia from medical journals saying that male circumcision does not affect sexual activity or sensitivity
    1
  26. Kragatar why are you making mountains out of molehills? And why do you distrust the scientific journals?
    1
  27. Jonathan Campos nice copout
    1
  28. Jonathan Campos no citations? A lot of what you say is anecdotal, conjecture, or generalizing, like "most men" or many men complain". Ultimately if it's so important than why is circumcision legal around the world, whereas FGM is illegal? Why do medical studies conclude that circumcision on babies does not affect sex? You are calling all doctors and all medical texts wrong? Why should I trust you? You're just some know-nothing online, so is your little source
    1
  29. Jonathan Campos what makes you think their word is equal to the entire American medical community?
    1
  30. Sylvia Rohge can you give an example of how it is harmful or how the hygienic benefits are unproven? What also are lower value estimations of males?
    1
  31. Kragatar there's nothing to complain about. You're not missing anything, there is no data to show that circumcision disables you in anyway, if you are circumcised as an infant. And when you're an adult, it's too late. Surgery will affect you unlike how it does not affect infants. So in order to give men better hygiene and aesthetics it's ✂️
    1
  32. Sylvia Rohge FGM is not comparable to male circumcision. That is why throughout the developed world, circumcision is legal and FGM is illegal.
    1
  33. Jonathan Campos no because those countries that support FGM are not comparable to the US. They are developing and the US is developed.
    1
  34. Sylvia Rohge None of that makes sense. Babies need hands and cant live proper lives without them. The foreskin is meaningless. Male circumcision does not disable men when they undergo it as infants. Plus there are hygienic benefits.
    1
  35. Kragatar You and I know that those bodyparts, unlike the foreskin, each serve an actual purpose and losing them is debilitating. The benefits of removal don't exist for your nose unlike the foreskin
    1
  36. Jonathan Campos ok well there's a benefit
    1
  37. Kragatar your quality of life will be negatively affected without your nose and so on. But you and I both know, removing the foreskin from infants causes no harm, risks are minute, and the procedure gives modest but significant hygienic benefits. To some that's worth it
    1
  38. Jonathan Campos nucleargrizzly?
    1
  39. Jonathan Campos that is so you isn't it? Don't lie
    1
  40. Jonathan Campos there are no studies that show that circumcision on infants causes harm. So what're you complaining about?
    1
  41. Kragatar see a doctor dude most people don't have problems with their circumcised dicks
    1
  42. Sylvia Rohge if it were true that female circumcision was harmless and imparted positive benefits then I'd consider supporting it, but that's not the case. The point about teeth makes no sense. You can't live comfortably without your teeth, unlike your foreskin. You can't compare male circumcision to FGM or amputation
    1
  43. Kragatar your problem is probably caused by other factors
    1
  44. Kragatar I have no idea. You should ask your doctor
    1
  45. Sylvia Rohge there is no proof that circumcision on infants negatively affects your life your argument is invalid
    1
  46. Kragatar your anger doesn't necessarily make a lot of sense. If you choose to be angry for no good reason, that's only your fault
    1
  47. Jonathan Campos tell them to stop being angry? Ok sure why?
    1
  48. Jonathan Campos circumcision is not comparable to rape because circumcision is harmless and is surgery
    1
  49. Jonathan Campos less dickcheese and better hygiene justified the minute risks
    1
  50. Jonathan Campos the point is circumcision makes your junk a little cleaner and apparently hardier, since you can't get infected from soaps either. That's worth the minute risks of surgery.
    1