Comments by "0IIIIII" (@0IIIIII) on "The Infographics Show" channel.

  1. This quote has been misinterpreted by the gun crowd as an endorsement of the 2nd Amendment. It’s not, it’s an endorsement of the US’s military might. Nothing to do with civilian gun owners
    31
  2. You can easily get a job without college, most of them though don’t pay well. Enjoy being poor.
    20
  3. XMaster34 the US went in to help South Vietnam, just like in the Korean War when the North invaded
    13
  4. True, the GOP right wingers are spending money on Trump golfing trips and corporate welfare. Vote Democrat to stop this Republican abuse
    12
  5. This is an urban legend not actual history. Ghosts aren’t real.
    11
  6.  @williewilson2250  -_- brilliant analysis. The quote is not about the American civilians being armed, it’s about the US being a large and developed nation that would be impossible to invade. True regardless of the 2A
    10
  7. Amerifat gun owners will never win against a profesional military. Not even the Viet Cong or the Taliban could win a battle against a professional military, and they were rugged survivalists.
    9
  8. Evan Olson you are naive. Civilians with guns are no match for a professional military. Civilians will not give up their comfortable lives to organize in the wilderness
    9
  9. Leo O'Ryan Civilians don’t have the money and supplies for a protracted war. You bought 1 anti tank rifle. Great. How’s that going to stop a column of tanks?
    7
  10.  @williewilson2250  the quote was said in contemplation of Japan invading the US. Japan was not planning on invading any other large nation at that time, it had already invaded China, and other Asian nations were tiny in comparison. So the reason it wasn’t said to any other country is because Japan was not seeking to invade any other comparable nation. This does not prove that the 2A is important
    7
  11. It happens all the time
    6
  12. You are uneducated. The US has huge costs and salaries to Bureaucrats are a small faction
    6
  13. Dr.Whiteboy it was a joke chill out
    6
  14. speedy01247 bribes? There is no bribery in the US. Lobbying is not bribery, lobbying is exclusively spent on campaigning. Politicians do not get rich from using lobbyist money
    5
  15. Armando Acosta That may be true but I suspect there is always a catch, no such thing as easy money. I bet those jobs likely require something special, like connections, past experience, or are competitive. In other words, a skill set equivalent to a Bachelor’s.
    5
  16.  @williewilson2250  Yes, yes you are done.
    5
  17. Americans do not have stockpiles for an army of rebels. They have personal guns and small stores of ammo. They are overweight and untrained. They are living on the grid and can be killed easily by cutting off water and power. Red Dawn is a dream.
    4
  18. True, Texas and other GOP states are drains on liberal states
    4
  19. meh G You are wrong. Lobbyist dollars do not go into politicians’ pockets. It goes into their re-election campaigns. That’s an important distinction.
    4
  20. MarquisVonMonster college is a smart idea. You can easily make way more money with a degree in STEM than without
    4
  21. 1. Cuz they have to be to cover costs of expensive batteries. Once costs fall, so will price. 2. All these cars are new. Once used cars start floating around they will be more common and thus cheaper 3. Things are worth what people are willing to pay. So as long as people are willing to buy luxury and luxury-lite cars, that’s what Tesla will sell.
    4
  22. Winning means defeating the enemy. So I take it that means that all organized nations besides the US are destroyed. The US would annex land closest and geographically isolated (Mexico, Canada, Greenland). The US military would occupy strategic areas to prevent anarchy, like Japan and Western Europe. But not annex due to distance. Then the US would establish friendly regimes in the rest of lands too distant or difficult to control directly.
    3
  23. Wow so you will sit back and let the US protect the world for you?
    3
  24. Warped Gecko they also appeared in the Weimar Republic, which was not socialist. Corruption and mismanagement are not exclusive to socialism.
    3
  25. innocenty1bystander it will never happen and you know that. Most gun owners have zero survival skills and can’t function away from society
    3
  26. AbeusMaximus the US thoroughly thrashed the Viet Cong. Viet Cong suffered 900,000 deaths. Adjusting for the US’s population, that means millions of Americans would die if they launched a similar insurgency. Is that a realistic price that anyone’s willing or able to pay? How about you?
    3
  27. Desu Vult Biden does not sniff kids or forget speeches.
    3
  28. SeaJay Oceans Russia is being sanctioned too. Do you see Russians starving? Clearly sanctions are not the cause of Venezuela’s poverty.
    3
  29.  @williewilson2250  “The rifles” are a reference to US service members. It is not a reference to armed civilians or the Second Amendment. The reason why Yamamoto does not ascribe this quote to other nations is because Yamamoto was not discussing other nations, he was discussing the bleak possibility of an invasion of the Lower 48. Has nothing to do with armed civilians or the 2nd Amendment.
    3
  30.  @edforres1984  You are wrong. Democrats are the only party that makes sense. The Republicans are proven wrong in every major area, like universal healthcare, gun control and climate change, other nations are proof.
    2
  31. Stenky what does that have to do with current events?
    2
  32. Eman Rodr The US didn’t win the war anywhere yet. Withdrawing troops from the Middle East is a victory for dictators
    2
  33. Hi. I’m here to tell you that you are not smart. It’s more nuanced than socialism. It’s specific government policies that aren’t exclusive to socialism.
    2
  34. Ben when have civilians defeated the US military? The Viet Cong and the Taliban have never won a battle against the US. And these guys were rugged farmers and survivalists, NOT civilians
    2
  35. Jim Johnson you have no training and will never organize into a threat, stop dreaming
    2
  36. Hubris the gun nuts don’t have stores of supplies, or allies to fund their efforts. They would give up quickly they’re no Taliban or Viet Cong
    2
  37. Andrew Baldi there’s more to being a soldier than target practice, fat gun nuts will never last a real war
    2
  38. N. Word Scissorhands I have not served in the military but I know bs when I smell it. Gun owners fighting Red Dawn style is bs
    2
  39. Walker Nicholas Barr Americans will never form guerrilla warfare. American civilians have no skills necessary to live off the grid. If a nation has the power to defeat the US military and invade the country, they have power to destroy our grid.
    2
  40. His mouth is open and he has a mustache and a beard
    2
  41. Children like you should not be on the Internet
    2
  42. Haha no. I’m in college and this blows
    2
  43. Sweden, not really socialist but still. This isn’t simply a case of “socialism is bad”, it’s more nuanced. Hyperinflation isn’t a socialist problem. It happened to other nations like the Weimar Republic.
    2
  44.  @Jayo8six0  I can ask you for proof that the Japanese knew and feared armed civilians. There’s no indication that they did.
    2
  45. Hysterical witnesses. That woman who “saw a face” is an idiot who shouldn’t have spoken up.
    2
  46. Amerifats gun owners are no match for a professional military. If the US is invaded, most likely citizens would be drafted, so there’ll be no militias anyways.
    1
  47.  @cruzzindodge  false, veterans are not well trained for a guerrilla war. -Most aren’t trained even in combat. -Veterans are required to to retake boot camp if they’ve been out for 2 years or more. Meaning their skills quickly deteriorate. -The veterans are meaningless and do not prove the 2nd Amendment will deter a foreign invasion.
    1
  48.  @amightyshade  yes, but if it were to, the 2nd Amendment would be USELESS
    1
  49.  @gamemastersully8074  if true, it is likely due to other factors. The mountain of evidence from other developed nations, year after year, is indisputable
    1
  50. Come on man study harder. Hire a tutor or stay after to get help. You’ll thank yourself later
    1
  51. Sabgin becuase it’s wrong?
    1
  52. Most Kamikaze pilots survived as they were shot down and taken prisoner by American Sailors
    1
  53. Fake
    1
  54. Republican states
    1
  55.  @gypsyfreak7934  :P
    1
  56. George Allen in the same way US was able to supply its forces to Iraq and Afghanistan, far from the homefront and in hostile territory, any superpower able to invade the US would have similar capabilities. This fictional supperpower would have no need for the American grid, and would not be starving as you claim. The grid would be something they’d target to sow chaos. Furthermore it’s unlikely that your average American gun owner can function apart from society. Most Americans get their water and power from utilities and without these, there’s no guerrilla movement. US civilians don’t have the skills that guerrillas like the Viet Cong and Taliban had.
    1
  57. Kuro Usagi you can call that socialism. But I caution you to not generalize or apply this to other nations.
    1
  58. Warped Gecko Venezuela has corruption and hyperinflation, those aren’t socialist problems
    1
  59. US sanctions have no bearing on agriculture. Russia is being sanctioned, do you see starving Russians? Clearly US sanctions aren’t the problem.
    1
  60. Pickled Sausages Venezuela can produce bread and corn, there’s plenty of land to grow food, there always has been. Chavez and Maduro have caused this crisis by setting price ceilings on food. Wow, suddenly nobody wants to make food. And on top of that the nation is corrupt and causes things like blackouts. US sanctions only amount to so much.
    1
  61. North Koreans think a women will be given easier treatment on a world stage. I think they are correct, populists are easily swayed by stereotypes
    1
  62. Jim Johnson I live in Massachusetts go to college and vote Democrat
    1
  63. Denon Servo I live in Massachusetts I dislike civilians owning guns and don’t think gun owners are any match for a real war
    1
  64. Helen Bell my point was civilians are always outmatched by professional militaries.
    1
  65. Nick Call This proves that the 2nd Amendment is not relevant to defend the country from an invasion. It’s the military, police, and smart politics that kept the US safe
    1
  66. asteinmann I am not pro China I support Western globalism and civil rights for all. But I am against delusions of 2nd Amendment types who think they will repel anyone
    1
  67. Christa Lorenz Free I am American but it’s funny reading nutty theories by uneducated people who think they will die fighting an imaginary war. They are delusional
    1
  68. Not Normal uneducated. Millions of Vietnamese died fighting the US. Do you want millions of Americans to die fighting foolish guerrilla tactics? Think
    1
  69. SamuraiAtlas TSM that’s a fantasy ignoring real life. Who’s gonna fund these Red Dawn style rebels? What are they going to eat? Where are they gonna live? Are American gun owners prepared to die in huge numbers to fight an invasion? Doubtful
    1
  70. Big bobby H the Taliban are weak but they are enduring. And unlike Amerifat gun owners they know how to be a threat to other militaries and live off the grid. They are actual guerrilla fighters and Amerifats with guns don’t compare
    1
  71.  @americanpatriotism1776  not simple at all, real life is not Call of Duty
    1
  72. Desu Vult Where is the proof? I found no evidence
    1
  73. INSECT BITE - An article by Vanityfair cites a Trump official who stated Trump allowed and wanted the Coronavirus to spread in coastal liberal states, as it would embarrass the Democrats ruling there. Trump has blood on his hands, and I hate him for it. Trump is the reason why US has highest rate of COVID-19 deaths worldwide, and hasn’t flattened the curve unlike in Europe. This recession, 200,000 dead, and billions spent on relief, are all Trump’s fault due to his willful negligence.
    1
  74. INSECT BITE - where is the proof that Democrats support China?
    1
  75. Joseph Fujioka Not possible since Congress passes taxes, pretty sure
    1
  76. fuji808 _ Biden if he became president, cannot raise income taxes
    1
  77. fuji808 _ That is a false dichotomy. The OECD reports that the US spends the most % of GDP on healthcare of any developed nation, in spite of the fact that healthcare is not universal. This is because there is too much deregulation and for profit bloat, which Medicare and Medicaid pay for. Healthcare would be cheaper if the US passed sweeping regulations on the drug and other such industries, and then made healthcare universal
    1
  78. Blaming socialism for Venezuela’s problems is naive. Hyperinflation has happened to other countries, it’s not unique to socialism.
    1
  79. Colonel Stalin there’s no tropical equator on a flat earth model. Real life Greenland is cold because the Earth is both round and tilted.
    1
  80. Not everyone who enters Supermax has a life sentence. So rehabilitation is the goal.
    1
  81. @ lobbying might be problematic, but it is much much more clean than bribery. Nobody is making money off lobbying besides spending it for campaigning. Lobbyist aren’t giving politicians gifts or money generally, that is still very much illegal and strictly enforced. They’re giving them money for campaigning and getting elected. So it’s not personal enrichment. That’s what makes it far less sinister.
    1
  82. This is a joke right? American gun owners are untrained, overweight, and have no means to survive outside off the grid in a drawn out war.
    1
  83. Nope
    1
  84. He should’ve sought a pardon from the governor.
    1
  85. Waltiswicked yes he is not smart
    1
  86. Vladislav the military doesn’t kill civilians in any significant amount
    1
  87.  @williewilson2250  you make no sense to me
    1
  88.  @verdebusterAP  where is the proof that the 2A has ever mattered in a modern war? Waiting...
    1
  89.  @davidsalinas676  Pearl Harbor was not an invasion though as no troops landed
    1
  90.  MFromThaWOOD Show  How can a bot argue with such intelligence as mine? Even I cannot create such fine code
    1
  91.  @tfcjon  where is the reasoning to support this nonsense? Why would Yamato fear armed American 4Fs and women?
    1
  92.  @gorilladisco9108  The ROC was weak and easier to invade than the US. The US was developed and more powerful than the ROC. There is zero proof that the 2A had anything to do with deterring a Japanese invasion of the US or the Lower 48.
    1
  93.  MFromThaWOOD Show  you know it is Putinist Russia that supports the NRA right? Remember the spies they sent in the Trump era? They support the NRA because they know gun rights hurts the US.
    1
  94.  @eane1275  dude it was reported by the news multiple times how the Kremlin under Putin wanted to build ties to the NRA. Kremlin bots also spread pro-NRA and mass shooting conspiracy theories online, proof that enemies want gun rights because they are known to hurt the US
    1
  95.  @gustini2146  of course Russia knows US Gun rights are bad for the US. why else would Russia, a hostile regime, support Trump and the NRA?
    1
  96.  @GFWoodchuck  I want you to re read your comment and ask if it makes sense. Then I want you to delete it. Thank you, and vote Democrat
    1
  97.  @espada9  in 1938 the US had a large economy and a large population, this is what Yamamoto was afraid of. He was not afraid of civilians armed with guns. He was aware, correctly, that the US was a superpower beyond Japan’s strength.
    1
  98.  @Meinan4370  lol equating untrained and unfit civilians to professional soldiers. Are you serious
    1
  99.  @101mazz  even more dumb is a fool who ignores decades of data across dozens of developed nations. Gun control saves
    1
  100.  @mappsmappings4025  what you said makes no sense, is unproven, and doesn’t pertain to gun rights at all
    1
  101.  @mappsmappings4025  yes and I am correct
    1
  102.  @mappsmappings4025  false, US had a large economy and population, so even if at the time the US military was weak, the potential was obvious, and it did materialize
    1
  103.  @mappsmappings4025  let’s think about this. This idea that the Japanese would invade the US and fight civilians is absurd. US gun owners then and now are weak and untrained. Furthermore any resistance against the Japanese would be organized by the US government and so the 2A would be irrelevant. Look at actual partisan groups in WW2. The successful ones were equipped by foreign powers like the UK and the US.
    1
  104.  @mappsmappings4025  if they did have guns, and they often did have guns by the way, it wouldn’t have mattered. Their civilian guns would’ve been ineffective. Secondly it is demonstrably unnecessary
    1