Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "Why Russia Can NEVER Use a Nuclear Weapon" video.

  1.  @PaulJWarburg  You seriously don’t believe half the stuff you say. .? You are at least 30 years behind in your knowledge of the Russian military. Time for an upgrade
    9
  2. @ You know nothing about Russian infrastructure. Russia has high speed rail America doesn’t . Russia has hypersonic missiles America doesn’t . NASA was using Russian rockets on its space shuttle
    8
  3. @ Times Radio . lol . Russia may be using donkeys . But they are also using hypersonic missiles , su 57 s400, t90m tanks , advanced electronic warfare . And have the most advanced nuclear forces in the world The German army in 1940 also used horses the Japanese army used bikes to take Singapore off the British So what is your point ?
    6
  4.  @pierresaelen3097  What empire what colonies . You talk nonsense. And Russia is not the Soviet Union
    5
  5.  @MichelleLopez-u9m  Russian nuke forces are the most advanced in the world and well maintained . You have a soviet mindset
    5
  6.  @eltororist3366  A country that can develop hypersonic missiles , advanced air defences , the su 57 are very advanced scientifically
    5
  7. @ Russia doesn’t need nukes to deal with Ukraine or nato . Oreshnik
    5
  8. @ Both sides suffer losses in a war that is war . Difference is Russia can easily replace its losses Ukraine cannot . What happened to all the “ game changer “ NATO weapons given to Ukraine that changed nothing ? Shall I name a few eg leopard tank , Abrams tanks , Bradleys , f16 , patriot etc .
    4
  9. @ Ukraine was not an independent country but part of the Soviet Union . Saying Ukraine has all the best scientists is like all the best American scientists come from Texas
    4
  10.  @MichelleLopez-u9m  a few might work ? How about all of them
    4
  11.  @sid35gb  Russia maintains its own nukes
    4
  12. @ Russia has the largest railway network on Earth . Works pretty well . In America bridges collapse for no apparent reason and helicopters fly into passenger planes
    4
  13. @ They have no energy what will that lead too . Freezing as a start
    3
  14. @ A very good comparison seeing they were two of the best armies in the world at the Time and they used rather basic transport means sometimes . If Russia is using donkeys and I have yet to see evidence so what . Does that mean they don’t have advanced weapons too . .?Illogical
    3
  15. @ Russia gained manpower from the four new areas they now own . If Russia was short of manpower they would mobilise more than once . Russian losses are much lower than Ukraines . It is they who have the manpower shortage Russian economy grew 4% in 2024. Their army is three times bigger now than in 2022. Nato is falling apart it is obvious You are misinformed
    3
  16. @ A disaster for who ?
    3
  17. @ where are the f16s . .? The SU57s have long range missiles no need to be close to the front lines . Where are the Nato carriers as well ? A long way away
    3
  18.  @rockets4kids  Russia makes its own trains plenty of spare parts . It is the EU which is reliant on Russian energy . Good luck next winter
    3
  19. @ That is all you have . A laugh with nothing to back it up
    3
  20. @ 80% of the population live in the cities . Those areas are modern and as advanced as any western areas. In Russia people don’t live under bridges . Russia has a much smaller population than the US and nowhere near the amount of debt . You seem to be unable to realise that over 30 years ago the entire Russian system collapsed . I think their recovery is remarkable
    3
  21.  @slavcpanigaz846  Got anything else to offer that I can respond too ? Or shall I just laugh back 😂😂😂
    3
  22. @ It’s not a massive drain on the workforce . Russian only spends 6% of its GDP on the war The drain is in Ukraine and Nato
    2
  23. @ I don’t have to try at all when dealing with Low quality opponents who don’t know anything
    2
  24.  @PaulJWarburg  Russia gave warnings not threats . Luckily Putin is cool headed otherwise we would all be gone . Now Russia has Oreshnik that can inflict massive damage with radiation . American minuteman is obsolete by comparison
    1
  25.  @kiabtoomlauj6249  Russia has hypersonic missiles that don’t even need warheads . The kinetic force is enough to cut an aircraft carrier in two . Russia is not the Soviet Union you need to upgrade your knowledge America cannot compete with Russia in weapons production . And then the Americans have to try and get men and equipment across the ocean as Russian ships and subs wait armed with long range hypersonic missiles . Good luck with that
    1
  26.  @kiabtoomlauj6249  Russia is not the Soviet Union. Please upgrade your knowledge
    1
  27.  @vforwombat9915  But easy to get the truth out of Ukraine and the west ? 😄
    1
  28.  @kungfujoe2136  Russia doesn’t need nukes they have Oreshnik hypersonic missile . Just like a nuke but no radiation
    1
  29.  @LucianoCantabruel There is no nuclear threat . Russia has weapons ( Oreshnik ) that make nuclear weapons unnecessary
    1
  30. What are the wests nuclear weapons used for ? Striking fear into the people is my guess
    1
  31.  @PaulJWarburg Money and effort ? Where is the evidence ? You mean the 100,000$ Russians spent in FB posts .
    1
  32.  @pierresaelen3097 what empire . You mean Russias two bases outside of Russia ?
    1
  33.  @pierresaelen3097 Russia is not an empire it is one country with virtually no bases outside of Russia. There are no internal colonies there is only Russia . And no one wants to break away . The opposite actually . You are very misinformed As for nuclear warnings I don’t see how they are relevant. Is Russia going to nuke itself ?
    1
  34.  @Greatshadowfighter 9 billon when using ppp is around 30 billion . Russia concentrates on a smaller number of hypersonic missiles which cannot be stopped
    1
  35. Ever heard of missiles ? Russia is way ahead in missile technology. Hypersonic missiles regardless of what the propaganda says cannot be shot down . Basic physics . Even Biden admitted that . . Way to fast and they manoeuvre Most of American weapons including their carriers are obsolete . The Americans also cannot match Russia in raw materials and manufacturing capacity . My advice to America is to stay in America
    1
  36. @ They have never been knocked out of the sky . Not physically possible . Too fast and unpredictable . No evidence of shoot down at all . Russia is generations ahead in missiles and air defence Have you seen the state of Ukraine . Patriots are doing nothing . The ones that haven’t already been destroyed that is
    1
  37. @ Hypersonic weapons cannot be shot down. Certainly not by a patriot
    1
  38. Russia has far superior advanced weapons than America . Most American weapons are obsolete . Ukraine never had nukes The ones in Ukraine were soviet and then passed on to Russia . The nuclear codes were in Moscow As we can now see with the USaid scandal what America says it’s spends money on is not true This man knows nothing about the subject . Propaganda
    1
  39.  @saiyanofsteel  High failure rate ? Tell that to the Ukrainians
    1
  40.  @ImperialDiecast  What is happening in Kursk is s disaster for Ukraine
    1
  41. @ Russian produces all its own spare parts . Not dependent on the west for anything . However the EU is dependent on Russian gas and oil . Good luck next winter . Hypersonic missiles are a joke ? That’s why America has been trying to get them for years and failed . They are no joke of you are on the receiving end
    1
  42.  @matthewhuszarik4173  The Russian rail system is 105,000 miles long . 60% is electrified . Modern by any standard
    1
  43.  @matthewhuszarik4173  Have you been there ?
    1
  44.  @Danielsoda83  I would say it doesn’t matter they are all American . No evidence that the best scientists in the Soviet Union were Ukrainian Russian scientists in 2025 are among the best in the world. That’s why Russia has hypersonic missiles and the west doesn’t
    1
  45.  @Danielsoda83  I would say it doesn’t matter they are all American .
    1
  46. @ I’m not trying hard at all . Your speculation about my motives is irrelevant you are guessing .how about addressing the points I made if you can? Russia is fifteen years ahead in missile and other technology . It has been physically demonstrated on the battlefield
    1
  47. @ All the UK weapons are obsolete and old . They would be ineffective against Russia to a large degree . Either on a conventional or nuclear level . Britain acting like a serious military power is laughable . They need to be quiet
    1
  48. @ Russian air defences defeated ? After ten of thousands of drone and missile attacks over the last three years Russian infrastructure remains almost 100% intact . That indicates very good air defence
    1
  49.  @pete_lind  Keep believing all that nonsense if it makes you feel good . But the reality is the opposite. Russia produces more weapons than all of Nato put together according to Rutte head of nato
    1
  50.  @davidsnyder3799  One “ possible “ hypersonic missile ? You haven’t really been paying attention have you?
    1
  51. @ whose winning ? 😊
    1
  52.  @davidsnyder3799  Russia has 14 million males between the ages of 18 and 34. Why would they have to use old people in the army . Can you explain ?😊
    1
  53.  @davidsnyder3799  Any drone footage of NK troops in combat in Ukraine ? Of course not 😄
    1
  54.  @slavcpanigaz846  I’ll raise you 5000
    1
  55.  @slavcpanigaz846  My name is Svetlana not Ivan
    1
  56. @ I’m actually Ivan’s brother
    1
  57. @ The reason is that close to all Russians own their own homes . That is why no bridge dwellers
    1
  58. @ Zircon is a hypersonic cruise missile already used in combat . Mach 10 .Oreshnik was used for the whole world to see several months ago . All these missiles also manoeuvre. Which clearly defines what a hypersonic missile is
    1
  59. American victory ? Pardon me but it was Russia that won the war . America entered the war when the worst of it was over
    1
  60. Russia doesn’t need nukes they have conventional weapons such as Oreshnik and hypersonic missiles like Zircon to inflict nuclear type damage without fallout
    1