Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "Target Europa: Russia's Next Geopolitical u0026 Propaganda Target in Europe." video.

@ But Zimbabwe doesn’t have the fourth biggest economy in the world , is not a commodities superpower, and has no global influence at all Inflation on electricity in America is 31%. Inflation is running amok in the west Give me the economic data on areas outside of Moscow and St Petersburg to prove your claim that poverty is rife in those places Otherwise you are just talking empty words
3
You are spinning a conspiracy theory . There is no evidence Russia wants to invade Europe . How would they benefit . Europe has no natural resources , no manufacturing and a hostile population. If they wanted to invade Europe they wouldn’t go through Ukraine they would march to the polish border via Belarus . Very easy . Your contradiction is that you claim Russia is on the verge of collapse and its army weak and yet somehow they are a danger to Europe and the world . That doesn’t add up
2
You never mention BRICS . If you do your narrative that Russia is isolated would collapse. Russia is weak , isolated its army poor . And yet they are a threat to Europe and the world . None of that adds up You also fail to mention that when using PPP Russia has the fourth biggest economy in the world . Its army has just been named the worlds best by Firepower You also never mention Americas drive to control the world and be the number one power .
2
@ They are not trying to capture Kiev . And Russia has taken 1000 square kms of land in the last two months . And they are only using a fraction of their army in Ukraine
2
@Ma-official_ And what do they say Ukraine losses are using those methods ? Let me guess 31,000 ?
2
@ ? The clown army has made a clown out of nato
1
@ but it is a very important 1000 square kms in Ukraine strategically and economically. And what troops Russia has lost Ukraine has lost far more
1
@ How did you guess I am Indian that is amazing ? . You are true racist oracle
1
@Ma-official_ just a slight alteration Russian deaths 72,000. Confirmed by mediazona and the BBC Nato deaths 0 ? Comedy gold
1
@Ma-official_ about 150,000 casualties is the truth
1
@ Well Mediazona and the BBC calculated Russian deaths by going on death notices throughout Russia . What methods do you use ? Obviously if there were massive Russian deaths it would be impossible to cover up that many funerals . It would be all over social media and it isn’t North Korea asked to be part of the war to give their troops battle experience. 10,000 Korean troops would make no difference. Russia has hundreds of thousands of reserves why would they need North Koreans? Just being logical
1
@Ma-official_ where is your evidence for your claims ? The American institute of war is a neoconservative group and biased . What methodology do they use to calculate their numbers . ? What numbers do Orynx give for Ukraine losses ? And what is their methodology ?
1
@Ma-official_ The American institute of war is a neoconservative group and not especially objective ? What was their methodology for reaching their conclusions If Russian losses were that hight they would have to mobilise again and they haven’t What does oryx say Ukraine losses are Mediazona whose numbers are also confirmed by the Pentagon papers calculate numbers based on funeral notices across Russia . Obviously in the day of social media and phone cameras it would be impossible to cover up mass funerals .
1
@Ma-official_ when America invaded Iraq they did so with 39 other countries . North Korea is a Russian ally . Their presence doesn’t mean anything
1
@Ma-official_ estimates based on what ? And what are their estimates for Ukraine losses ? The pentagon papers put Ukraine casualties at seven times higher than Russian
1
@Ma-official_ I asked what methodology they use for calculating casualties ? Pretty simple question
1
@Ma-official_ I got the name wrong but my description of who they are is correct . Who funds them ? I can tell you I just want to know if you know
1
@Ma-official_ open source is not a totally reliable source . And what are their calculations for Ukraine losses using the same methods Or don’t they mention Ukraine losses . ? Logic would say that Russia would have had to fully mobilise if those losses were true . And they haven’t . Mediazona uses death notices across Russia to calculate losses . And also the Russians have the same access to the methods used by your sources as well, including satellite and drone footage
1
@Ma-official_ Social media ? Where are all those Russian funerals taking place. Hundreds of thousands of excess funerals would be all over social media. And guess what they aren’t . That’s a big hole in your argument Your argument against Mediazona and the claim that Russian losses are not declared comes with no evidence at all
1
@ Of course all Russian losses are declared . It’s called death notices and funerals . That sounds like a conspiracy theory that Russia is keeping troop deaths a secret from their families . Absurd You offer no evidence that any of that is true As I said if it was true Russia would have to mobilise and they haven’t
1
@ increasing wages is a sign that the Russian economy is doing well . 10,000 North Korean troops will make no difference . 500,000 yes . The troops are there for training and battle experience Russia has been on the defensive for most of the war
1
@ Inflation in the west has higher inflation . Electricity 31% in America . Russia has inflation lower than the west, but It is not hyperinflation America has a 35 trillion debt with American debt growing by a trillion dollars every 100 days . No eat it can be paid back . Russia has no debt . I wouldn’t worry about Russia I would be more concerned about your own country if I were you
1
@Ma-official_ in the last six months they have been on the offensive . The war is three years long nearly . So most of the time Russia has been on the defence. So Ukraine must have the higher losses going by your claim .
1
@ Their lines didnt collapse they withdrew . There was never major clashes in Kherson or Kharkov . Early in the war Russias didn’t have enough troops . They have enough now that’s why they are advancing They were using active defence . Defend and move forward when the opportunity arises. You have no understanding of manoeuvre warfare Read a book on it
1
@Ma-official_ which Russian analysts would disagree with me . Name them ? The satellite images even show no major battles in the Kherson and kharkov regions . The Russians simply moved out of those regions because of troop shortages and the Ukrainians moved in If there were major battles there would by physical evidence of it and there isn’t . The Russians made a strategic withdrawal all part of manoeuvre warfare They left a small number of troops to hold the lines while the manoeuvre was accomplished . Ukraine had huge losses before the withdrawal
1
@philippeovart3654 Now Trump is in the funding will end . The end. And it’s KIEV
1
@Ma-official_ Iraq had no air defence , airforce , navy or modern tanks and a conscript army . And the fighting was in non fortified open desert . Of course America took Bagdad in 22 days . Any modern army could have . lol You can’t seriously compare the Iraqi army with Ukraine army . Don’t be absurd
1
@Ma-official_ taking Bagdad did not win the war . That’s when the war started. You can’t seriously be comparing the Iraqi army with the Ukraine army .? Don’t be absurd. The poorest country in the world is Afghanistan . How did America go there ? And Vietnam
1
@ K I E V
1