General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Trevor Crook
OriginalHuman
comments

Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "OriginalHuman" channel.

@sseltrek1a2b American weapons eg Himar , patriot , Bradley , Abram. in Ukraine were supposed to be “ game changers “ They performed poorly
18
@MichaelScheele The su57 air to air missiles have double the range and speed of the f22 Aim130. Do you seriously think any aircraft can just fly around the combat zone without being noticed ..? They will be noticed very early and shot down by either the su57 or the s400
12
@sseltrek1a2b Do you think the f22 is stealth ? A 20 year old fighter ( f22 ) with obsolete air to air missiles isn’t going to cut it against advanced air defence
11
If you compare six su57 to six f22 the su57 with its much better weapons systems eg faster ,longer range would win . Especially if supported by ground air defences s400
10
@DrenoshGaming Russia well ahead of the west now in so many departments . Eg missiles , air defense , and tactics. You need to research more . You are basing your view on old information
10
@DrenoshGaming Stealth does not exist . S400 s500 can track any aircraft . They have been doing it in the Middle East in regard to f35 F22 is obsolete though a good aircraft when fighting inferior opponents. But Russian missiles are far superior in speed and range F22 and f35 will not be entering any war with Russia .
9
Trident 2 is obsolete . Ballistic and doesn’t manoeuvre . Predictable path . Advanced air defence can shoot it down . Sarmat ( Russian ) range 18,000 kms . New technology .hypersonic . Unstoppable That clip is old Ballistic missiles only reach hypersonic speed “ outside “ of the atmosphere. Hypersonic like Sarmat and zircon reach that speed “ within” the atmosphere and hit target at full speed , hence the huge kinetic energy they create on impact which has been measured . There is no drag as some misinformed people think Biden admitted that American has no defence against hypersonic missiles . They have never been shot down though there was an unverified claim one had . Which has since been debunked
6
Very old tank but still has a big gun . Ukraines losses are many times higher than Russias BTW
6
@MichaelScheele How do you know the su57 cant get a target lock on a f22…..? Perhaps Research the subject more
6
@hitmixhyepock9405 Russian hypersonic missiles can hit anywhere against any target and easily out distances any missile the Americans have . The f22 and f35 can be seen by Russian radar .
6
@ethanashley2141 Russia was dropping 150 glide bombs a day and hundreds of sorties . There was no fly zone except the one created by Russia
6
@procommunistdestruction2318 Four days for everything ? It took you 20 years to fight and lose to the Taliban
5
@loftiestchaf423 They are using them in Ukraine . A lot more than one with more coming
5
@MichaelScheele Don’t worry they can do it .Do the airfields and carriers the f22 uses stealthy ? Because they will be the first things targeted in a war. Fighting Iraq or Libya is not like fighting Russia . Nato made a huge mistake
5
Yes they are using it in Ukraine . The question is has the f22 and f35 been tested in high intensity war ? No America makes weapons for profit Russia makes them to work . Russian weapons manufacturing capacity inherited from the Soviet Union is massive . Manufacturing in the west is tiny by comparison. eg . American production of artillery shells 200,000 a year . Russian production of shells 4.5 million
5
America is way behind in missile technology
5
Russian missiles and air defence systems s400 s400 more than 10 years ahead . In Vietnam the Vietcong were using Russia air defence . End result America lost 10,000 aircraft . Ukraine had an airforce of 300 planes before the war . How many now ? 0
4
It didn’t work in Afghanistan
4
@Nihilianth America lost few troops because the enemy was weak with no serious weapons . No air defence ! Airforce , navy , tanks , missiles etc Ukraine is different . The biggest nato army in Europe . With every conceivable type of weapon , full support of 40 countries including AWAC And satellite intelligence And in two years of high intensity conflict Russia has lost 60,000 troops according to the pentagon while inflicting massive losses in men and equipment on the Ukrainians while using only a fraction of its army and with great restraint You need to reassess your position
4
The f22 uses the Aim120 air to air missile . Speed Mach 1. Range 160 kms SU57. Uses R37m. Speed . Mach 6. Range 400 kms The f22 won’t even get close
4
@DrenoshGaming How do you know if they are superior ?
4
@hitmixhyepock9405 The f22 will not reach the battle field . S400 s500 will see it
4
Russia is years ahead in missile technology and air defence technology
3
The Ukrainians have ( or had ) Russian air defence the s300 .A very capable system even though it’s old . If su57 had problems with the s300 and it’s possible . So would the f22 and f35
3
This is all stemming from the 2014 Maiden coup .
3
@hitmixhyepock9405 How do you “ sneek up “ up on an aircraft with double the range . And ground air defence with even longer range
3
@chugachuga9242 Sarmat and zircon are way ahead technologically . Who’s your source Walt Disney ..
3
@procommunistdestruction2318 Not that good ? Military experts disagree
2
@procommunistdestruction2318 Poor analogy
2
@gawainethefirst it absolutely did work ? 😆😆😆
2
@arcadiusdrathalas6007 Ukraine is not quite a rump state yet . It still has access to the Black Sea . But not for long
2
@teleguy5699 They are not a weak enemy . They have or had thousands of tanks , 600,000 troops, hundreds of air defence systems , missiles and fighting In very fortified area . And supported by 40 countries , trained , armed and given targeting information and satellite intelligence They were not the Taliban Russia could also have gone in with maximum power obliterated Ukraine killed a million people . But they chose a limited operation to limit infrastructure damage and casualties on both sides You know nothing about the subject
2
@chugachuga9242 So hypersonic missiles are the same as ballistic. .?Why are countries including America spending millions trying to develop them then ?
2
@Darktiger01 Russia has the biggest land army in the world. Plenty of troops . And Russia is not “ occupying Ukraine . What they have taken is now theirs by the will of the people in a referendum. Best if nato gets off the Russian border that’s what is fuelling the conflict
2
Most Abrams sent to Ukraine are no more . An old tank
2
The British military is not ready for a “ minor “ war
2
Because the propaganda is actually based on reality and physics not wishful thinking. The reality is that Russia has better weapons and a better army than America . Americans are butt hurt over that but probably recognise that fact
2
@boomman1349 what laws of physics have I got wrong .? One thing is for sure the Russians haven’t got it wrong
2
Forget what Ukrainians say about shoot downs . They never substantiate anything . Fantasists
2
@willracer1jz but fiction
2
@Texas.T What wars? Wars against countries eg Afghanistan , Iraq , Libya with no air defences
2
@chugachuga9242 Who were the f15 flying against ? We are talking fifth generation versus fifth generation . In 2023 Russia produced 230 aircraft . How many did America produce ? American doctrine is all about fighting low intensity war . A war with Russia will not be low intensity. America totally unprepared for such war
2
@pooferfish2850 the f22 and f35 have never been tested against quality air defence . Su57 not needed in Ukraine same for Russian advanced weapons . That is why they are not used much . Any American aircraft fifth generation or fourth will not survive against advanced air defence . And their platforms airfields and carriers easily targeted by missiles .
2
@pooferfish2850 Who have the American fighters fought of late ? Countries with no air defence and in most cases no airforce either So what is you get a 100 to 0 kill rate against a poor opponent. Proves nothing Russia fighting a country ( Ukraine ) that has good air defence . America has never done that . During the Vietnam war America lost 10,000 aircraft
2
Overhyped over priced and carries below par weapons like the Aim120 air to air missile . It won’t get close to its target against any Russian aircraft ( su57 ) or air defence ( s400 s500 ) another PR exercise
1
@dpelpal how can it be a threat then, as we are constantly told . If Russia is so weak no need for nato eh? See the inconsistency In your statement ?
1
@arcadiusdrathalas6007 It’s not a rump state of the Soviet Union . Different politics , different economic system and a leading world power in if’s own right After the war Ukraine will be cut off from the sea its economy in ruins 50% of the population gone . That is the definition of a rump state
1
@mrgrinch837 Nato is insurance of disaster . Look at the disaster that is Ukraine Now let’s talk of Americas military record when fighting wars against fourth rate armies and never winning .Incompetence on steroids As far as equipment goes all of western equipment sent to Ukraine had no effect. Most was either destroyed or paraded in Moscow The proof in Ukraine seems to show Russia winning
1
@mrgrinch837 America isn’t very good at either historically . Drew with North Korea in conventional war . Lost to insurgents in Vietnam And Afghanistan. Their proxy wars in Syria , Georgia and Ukraine were and are disasters . As for weapons , Americas are the most expensive
1
@mrgrinch837 America uses proxies to fight their wars these days. Syria Libya ,Georgia and now Ukraine . They seem to lack confidence With good reason I think
1
@mrgrinch837 America 20 years in Afghanistan and left in humiliation. Russia in Ukraine 2 years and winning . If the Russians are so poor and their weapons second rate why does anyone need insurance? 😆😆
1
@mrgrinch837 Nato insurance ? If Russias Military is so poor and its weapons second rate why does anyone need insurance ?😆😆
1
@teleguy5699 They are stifled by the fact that they are not that good . Only fighting weak defenceless countries like Iraq , Afghanistan, Libya etc in low intensity war does not prepare them for high intensity war against a peer power like Russia or China
1
@teleguy5699 Name the nations America has built ….?
1
America only fights defenceless people and third world armies . Then acts the hero
1
@paladinsix9285 I am talking beating a major military power. . The Phillipines , Cuba , South Korea are not major powers and those wars are years ago . And america lost to Cuba in the Bay of pigs invasion America lost badly in Vietnam , Afghanistan, Korea was a stalemate, Iraq remains unfinished
1
@Tlyna1952 The Americans could not win in Korea and Vietnam . And they were not hampered they used every available means to destroy the enemy ( civilians mainly ) including chemical weapons. In Iraq they used shock and awe . Stop making excuses for their ineptitude Hypersonic missile, s400 s500 , nuclear submarines, most advanced nuclear forces in the world . If Russia is a joke it has a killer punchline
1
@chrisd4432 hypersonic missiles , s400 s500 ,nuclear submarines. . If Russian army is a joke it has a killer punchline
1
@chrisd4432 Fourth biggest economy in the world with the number one army ( rated by firepower) . That makes it a global power
1
@chrisd4432 They have a lot more than nukes
1
@ Excuse me Wagner Is infantry only . They were ambushed by the Americans who used artillery and air strikes . Hardly a fair fight Russia is the fourth biggest economy in the world when using PPP And Russian economy is based on the commodities market which includes oil and gas. But they export many things . Oil and gas is but one aspect. Important yes but not the only thing they produce What is the American GDP based on . .? Consumerism . I’ll take oil and gas thanks very much
1
@chrisd4432 Russia doesn’t need nukes. Their latest hypersonic missile the Oreshnik has the power of a tactical nuke but is a conventional weapon . Range 5000 kms . Try and cope with that . What’s America got ? Very sinkable aircraft carriers , aircraft like the f35 and f22 that have never been tested in real combat against advanced air defence and a rather small land army that has no experience in modern warfare
1
@ Fourth when using PPP ( purchasing power parity ) .Thats the gauge the IMF uses . Sorry to disappoint you 😁
1
@PartOfTheGame The US only fights weak opponents . They are not keen to go into Ukraine directly are they ? They hide behind Ukraine
1
@Nihilianth Look at the countries you fought . Countries without advanced weapons or air defence . In Afghanistan case not even an army Of course America took low casualties . Like any other modern army would . Try your luck in Ukraine
1
@chugachuga9242 True hypersonic missiles have manoeuvre and are hypersonic “ within “ the atmosphere. Zircon is a hypersonic cruise missile for instance , never leaves the atmosphere . America has no such missiles Patriot never shot down a hypersonic missile. Data showing the alleged downing not released seeing that it never happened I have heard an explanation of how hypersonic glide missiles work . There is no drag it hits target at maximum speed , hence the kinetic energy . If hypersonic missiles work the way you say there would be no advantage in having them
1
@chugachuga9242 true hypersonic missiles have manoeuvre and are hypersonic within the atmosphere. Ballistic missiles are hypersonic “ outside “ of the atmosphere only and move in a straight line only Hypersonic missiles are impossible to shoot down . Biden admitted this There is no drag hence the huge kinetic energy when they hit which is measurable
1
@chugachuga9242 So hypersonic missiles are pointless seeing that 50 year old ballistic missiles are superior ? So why is America trying to produce one ? That makes no sense. All of your points are at odds with the physics True hypersonic missiles manoeuvre and reach speed “ within “ the atmosphere. Ballistic missiles cannot travel at hypersonic speed within the atmosphere or manoeuvre The kinetic energy when a hypersonic missile hits target is massive indicating it doesn’t slow down as it approaches target as some claim
1
@boomman1349 No using physics which has no bias. Hypersonic missiles reach that speed “ within “ the atmosphere. Ballistic missiles cannot . Otherwise no point having them . Russia s500 the only air defence system that can shoot down hypersonic missiles Glide breaker is theory. Comparing a zircon missile to a V2 is beyond absurd
1
@boomman1349 Obviously there is no problem with drag otherwise as you say the missiles would break apart . And they don’t
1
@lostbutfreesoul Americans hate being second .But they are not second . More like fourth or fifth lol
1
@boomman1349 There is drag normally but the Russians have worked out an answer. It’s called scientific progress
1
@boomman1349 If there is drag it would slow the missile down from Mach 9 to Mach 6 ( 4500 mph) a little faster than the tomahawk ( 500 mph
1
@boomman1349 With drag the missile slows from Mach 9 to Mach 6 . A little faster than Tomahawk
1
@boomman1349 The way around it possibly would be to vary speed throughout the flight . Obviously if hypersonic missiles were not superior they wouldn’t bother them . May as well stick with v2 I would like it explained by an impartial expert The Tomahawk has a top speed of 500 mph . Zircon is a little faster than that
1
@boomman1349 the difference is the air defence systems . S400 s500 are light years ahead of anything the west has . America put is money into offensive weapons and the Russians took the much cheaper option of defensive weapons . Ukraine has been a good testing ground for Russian hypersonic missiles . They do work
1
@boomman1349 Russia also has short range systems .eg Buk Pantzer and others . The have a multilayered defence The patriot has a success rate of 36% which is abysmal. Many patriots have been destroyed in Ukraine . All of them maybe. Two in Kiev were filmed getting it .The Ukrainians are screaming they need more . Why is that Also ammunition is very expensive and manufacturing limited The s400 uses multiple task radar and missiles by the way including short range. comparing it to binoculars😂😂 . It’s streets ahead of anything the Americans have You know little
1
Obsolete . Freedom ? 🤭
1
Who are they going to fight , the abominable snowman ?
1
@greenhighlander7 permanent presence of US army in your country makes it permanent target . Is that improving national security ? Stupid idea
1
@AncestorEmpire1 because they didn’t have the body
1
We will never surrender ? Yes you will
1
Russians don’t need stopping they aren’t coming . Another waste of money
1
@Darktiger01 New rifles not much good against hypersonic missiles . Forget war . It is not a video game
1
@Darktiger01 🤭🤭
1
@Darktiger01 You are such an expert . You must be a General ? Here you need one of these 🧠😁
1
@Darktiger01 Russian army at present 1.6 million plus 2 million reserves . Add 25 million inactive reserves who have had 12 months Military training . Largest number of tanks , armoured cars and artillery in the world . Largest number of missiles on earth More than all other countries combined , including America . Massive manufacturing base to produce more and a never ending supply of ammunition. America 460,000 troops . 1 million reserves . Tiny manufacturing base . Not big enough to sustain high intensity war for more than a few weeks Russia using glide bombs everyday . 150 a day . Air Dominance obvious 40 Ancient f16 s will make no difference . They will be shot down in the first week or destroyed on the ground Ukraine in retreat all across the front . Even Ukrainian maps show this Russia KIA 50,000 according to the BBC and Mediazona Ukraine KIA 500,000 according to most analysts How did you get so misinformed . You have a PHD in it lol The war is over . Get used to it
1
@ scrap metal
1
@ it was a Russian trap
1
@ Ukraine took 1500 square kms of territory. Russia 18 million square kms in size . Kursk really was a nothing burger
1
@ why do I need to cope if my side is winning ? You only have to cope when your side is losing .. Everyone is on the internet where so you get your information from The Dead Sea Scrolls ? lol
1
@ Advances ? lol . They have just lost 1000 square kms of territory out of the1500 square kms they had . And a small and temporary advance with huge losses is good . Goodness me
1
But one battle doesn’t make a war . The war is very one sided in Russias favour
1
Sweden collaborated with Nazi germany during WW2 even though they were officially neutral . A shameful history
1
The Russians aren’t coming
1
@Ashan581 Most drones were shot down and they are pinpricks that don’t affect the battle situation at all . If my memory serves me a Chinese weather balloon defeated the entire American air defences a while back? A jet fighter a little easier to see Can you compare drone damage to Russia with what’s going on in Ukraine at the moment as far as damage goes ?
1
@Ashan581 What happened on 9/11 ? Where were American air defence ? Nowhere
1
@Ashan581 What damage done to kremlin ….?
1
@Ashan581 What I’m saying is that no air defence is 100%. What damage has been done to Russia in air attacks and what damage has been done to Ukraine by comparison by the Russians ? Chalk and cheese America has a poor record in war even against weak enemies . So they are in no position to judge another countries war effort
1
@Ashan581 drones are harder to spot on radar than aircraft because they fly low . But 99% of drones have been shot down by the Russians . On a Military level it made no difference .
1
@Ashan581 But if America was at war the Chinese weather balloon could have been something more sinister . And the incompetence by American air defence on 9/11 was way worse than a tiny drone flying over the kremlin .
1
@Ashan581 America lost 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam to an enemy with no airforce . The British lost 6 warships in ten weeks in the Falklands war . America just lost a war in Afghanistan to an enemy with virtually no weapons at all
1
@thatonecrackhead2728 War is politics . You fight a war to achieve a political goal . If you don’t achieve that you have lost. The Americans were also there to protect poppy fields The retreat from Afghanistan by the Americans chaos and Disaster with troops being killed . It looked like military defeat to me
1
You will be in for a shock in a real war . You are basing your view on war games lol . When you have hypersonic missiles no need for stealth They can’t be stopped .zircon Sarmat are not hypersonic ballistic missiles ,wrong Pinocchio
1
@dominickleonardi True hypersonic missiles don’t leave the atmosphere . So they are not ballistic arch. But Russia has zircon , Sarmat that are not ballistic hypersonic . They are new technology true hypersonic . More advanced than anything America has . Kinzhal is more advanced than anything America has. It is classified as hypersonic by other countries too
1
If they were patriotic they wouldn’t have joined NATO. It will ruin their country
1
@callsigndisciple626 You can work it out easily . Main deaths are from artillery . Russia has a 10 to 1 advantage in artillery. Plus Russia has air power . Russia has mobilised once in 2022. If they had serious losses they would have to have mobilised more than once . Ukraine by Comparison has mobilised many times and have serious manpower shortages . There are other indicators but the ones I mentioned are enough to paint a picture BTW Ukraine never had nuclear weapons . They were Russian nukes deployed to Ukraine by the soviets. The nuclear codes were in Moscow not Kiev
1
@dennissvitak5475 They never had nuclear weapons . They were Russian nukes deployed to Ukraine . The codes were in Moscow Part of the Budapest memorandum was that Ukraine be Militarily neutral . Nato has been in Ukraine since 2014. That was a breach of Ukraines neutrality
1
@dennissvitak5475 Nato has been in Ukraine since 2014. That was a breach of the memorandum
1
@ Russia had lease on the port in Crimea until 2043 with the previous government . .
1
@ Modern day Russia is a different animal than the Soviet Union . Advanced weapons the soviets didn’t have , satellites , hypersonic missiles , advanced air defence etc . Russia doesn’t have an incompetent military and uses contract soldiers not conscripts . They are well trained and use 21st century tactics that you know nothing about. You are very short on facts and evidence
1
@callsigndisciple626 Russia doesn’t use conscripts on the front line. They use professional volunteers and they are well trained in modern warfare . And are hardly incompetent . Your view is misinformed
1
@chugachuga9242 No one is stealthy .. all aircraft can be seen by modern Russian radar
1
V2 was hypersonic only when outside of atmosphere. True hypersonic missiles reach that Speed “ within” the atmosphere. Laughing doesn’t help you . Best get more informed
1
Ukraine occupied 1500 square kms of territory several months ago . They now occupy less than 500 square kms of territory . And the area they have is getting smaller by the day
1
Nato is the threat not the solution. Increasing the chances of WW3 not a smart idea
1
There’s two military super powers lol if Sweden hadn’t joined nato no need for more military spending . Russia has no intention of invading Europe . No benefit . Massive propaganda
1
No evidence he was killed . No body no case
1
@bevinboulder5039 that doesn’t prove the story only that they had contact with him . If the DNA claim is true and I doubt it The evidence point to him not even being involved in the attack . The whole narrative doesn’t add up No one believes the official 9/11 story anymore
1
The twin towers could not have collapsed that way without help. The third law of motion makes the official explanation impossible .
1
@Onezmhu Russian missiles still faster Mach 6 . And far longer range. S400 range 400 kms s500 600 kms also . F22 and f35 won’t get close to target . And the platforms they use eg airfields and carriers will be targets Stealth is overrated . The Russians have been tracking f22 or f35 in the Middle East for some time . Stealth is a sales pitch
1
@Texas.T The s300 is still very capable . Whatever the su57 is vulnerable too all other fighters would be as well .
1
@chugachuga9242 Russian radar would pick up the f22 very quickly . When Israel f35=flies near Russian bases in Syria they are easily tracked . Stealth is nonsense when flying against advanced air systems
1
@Ashan581 su57 air to air missiles Mach 6 . And 400 kms range . F22 good but will get taken out from a distance . Luck not needed
1
@thatonecrackhead2728 Russia has way more advanced air systems than s300 . But it was saying that even an old soviet system from the 80s can still be effective
1
@pacmon5285 why don’t you argue with my numbers ? You can’t so you have to resort to name calling
1
@loftiestchaf423 You are wrong and going on old information . Russia uses Russian made parts including computer chips What else it needs it get from China . You don’t think Russia would launch an operation while being dependent on the west for anything militarily, economically do you ? No one is that stupid A true winning army doesn’t take more losses than the opposition . You are correct . That is why you know russia is taking less losses . Because they are winning
1
The US military fight weak enemies . And lose every war
1
@MJ19438 Did America keep the gloves on when they killed one million Iraqis , three million Vietnamese , three million North Koreans Americans have scant regard for human life They fight countries that can’t defend themselves like Iraq or Libya and then play the hero . Pathetic America cannot sustain wars with Russia or China . No manufacturing base to make weapons and ammunition. Not enough troops without bringing in conscription . No way to ship weapons across the oceans to the war theatres without their convoys being sunk by Russian or Chinese long range hypersonic missiles . And not enough raw materials . You live in a movie .
1
@Nihilianth But America doesn’t have to seize territory. They use bases , economic war , colour revolution, assassinations and the UN to control their interests globally . No need to physically be in countries
1
I can’t believe Americans boast about winning this war ( only the first part of it ) Iraq was an army of poorly trained conscripts With old soviet tanks that had no night vision no reactive armour . Iraq had no air defence , navy , airforce , satellite targeting or reconnaissance , no allies Goodness me it was like beating up a child
1
The Asovs are actual neonazis complete with swastikas . It shows how morally decayed the west is to support them
1
America is 34 trillion in debt . They can’t afford a bicycle in reality . Just print money while they are bankrupt
1
Never been tested against advanced air defence . Now the f22 is pretty old
1
Wagner is only infantry . American forces had artillery and air power . And it Syrian soldiers who died not Russian
1
@Onezmhu Su57 longer range and faster air to air missiles . Will take out the f22 at long distance The days of dog fights are over
1
@Ashan581 A few drones which were shot down in most cases are irrelevant . Most of the damage ( insignificant damage ) was downed drones hitting residential areas . No Military significant at all . America lost 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam war . And the Serbs brought down an American supposed stealth bomber with an old s200 in 1999 People in glass houses
1
@pooferfish2850 let’s face it America chooses it enemies eg Iraq , Afghanistan ,Libya . And always chooses countries that can’t fight back They have made a big mistake with Russia
1
@maeckknox6535 The f22 would have to worry about getting past the s400 first . Which it won’t
1
@maeckknox6535 The f22 will be noticed early on by the s400 and s500 . The su57 will not be needed
1
@chugachuga9242 You need to learn more about Russian weapons . They are superior on many levels . The platforms the f22s use ( airfields and carriers are not stealthy . They will be easily seen and destroyed .
1
@chugachuga9242 The American airfields and carriers the f22 take off from are not stealth and can been seen well enough to destroy . Which will be the case in a war . If Russia sinks a carrier it will destroy dozens of f22s and f35s in one hit
1
@chugachuga9242 . But Russia has far superior air defence and are fighting on their own land . A massive advantage . How do you think the woke American people will take to being under direct attack for the first time in their history . It will make 9/11 look like a tiff
1
People forget that Russia has hypersonic stealth missiles like the Khinzhal. The west has no match for these missiles . Many more variants too.
1
@Onezmhu out of those 1000 f35s only 300 are serviceable . Su57 long range high speed Mach 6 ) air to air missiles easily outperform any air to air missiles in speed and range the f22 f35 have .. max range for aim120 is 160 kms. Longest range for r37m that the su57 carries is 400 kms F22 f35 have to fly 240 kms to even get within range . All the time wide open to attack from Russias s400 and s500 on the ground If I was an American pilot I would refuse to fly . Pure suicide
1
@chugachuga9242 Khinzhal 10 Mach . Iskander 6 Mach . Not the same missile
1
@chugachuga9242 what study ? You are making things up . The patriot the Saudis had couldn’t shoot down old scuds fired from Yemen .let alone hypersonic missile . Patriot success rate 36% . Very poor Where as it proven itself ? Certainly not in Ukraine the Russians are bombing the hell out of it
1
@chugachuga9242 I looked it up . Propaganda . No evidence to prove it was a Khinzhal . They showed wreckage of the supposed Kinzhal shot down on CNN . It was clearly not a Khinzhal The war between Saudi Arabia and Yemen was quite recently not in the 70s Hundreds of successful intercepts ? Where . Most countries America has fought in the last decades have had no missiles . The odd scud maybe . America is still using old rubbish like tomahawk cruise missiles and minute man missiles from the 60s. They are way behind Russia in the missile technology
1
@chugachuga9242 The patriots are brilliant.Goodness knows how the Russians are able to bomb the hell out of Ukraine . I don’t get it
1
@chugachuga9242 Yes the patriot is brilliant . And I know it shot down a hypersonic missile because CNN told me . And they never lie 🤣🤣
1
@chugachuga9242 I listen to everyone . And where is your evidence for any of your claims ? The Saudi Yemen war was just recently not in the 90s. If patriots work how come Ukraine is being bombed into oblivion?
1
@chugachuga9242 what studies and what successful intercepts ? Lol
1
@chugachuga9242 A 10 Mach missile . hypersonic glide vehicles are not ballistic arch weapons. They are brand new technology and have no counter. Far too unpredictable and too fast to intercept Chuga. Ukraine is being devastated by the Russian missiles as we speak Chuga Where are all those patriots and calculus? Lol
1
if your sources are telling you that all the top missiles are American I’m afraid your sources lack validity
1
The f35 has been fraught with problems . It’s a lemon and badly designed aerodynamically Russia plans on having nearly 200 of them at some point. And with Russian massive manufacturing capacity it won’t be that long I have heard they have 80 of them . Hard to verify anything
1
F22 use Aim 120 air to air missile . Range 160 kms speed Mach 1. SU 57 use R37 air to air missile range 400 kms Mach 6
1
The Americans have yet to use any of their aircraft in high intensity war . Whatever problems the Russians are having in Ukraine in regard to air defence the Americans would have . If the Ukrainians can shoot down a su57 they can shoot down a f22
1
Russian air to air missiles that su57 carries are generations ahead of anything the Americans have
1
Doesn’t matter what Europe does they will never be in a position to fight any war . No manufacturing, no natural resources , manpower shortage without conscription , well behind in technology and soft and woke
1