Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "Royal Marine Reacts To Su-57: Russia's Stealth Fighter Competing with US F-22 and F-35" video.

  1.  @sseltrek1a2b American weapons eg Himar , patriot , Bradley , Abram. in Ukraine were supposed to be “ game changers “ They performed poorly
    18
  2.  @MichaelScheele The su57 air to air missiles have double the range and speed of the f22 Aim130. Do you seriously think any aircraft can just fly around the combat zone without being noticed ..? They will be noticed very early and shot down by either the su57 or the s400
    12
  3.  @sseltrek1a2b Do you think the f22 is stealth ? A 20 year old fighter ( f22 ) with obsolete air to air missiles isn’t going to cut it against advanced air defence
    11
  4. If you compare six su57 to six f22 the su57 with its much better weapons systems eg faster ,longer range would win . Especially if supported by ground air defences s400
    10
  5.  @DrenoshGaming  Russia well ahead of the west now in so many departments . Eg missiles , air defense , and tactics. You need to research more . You are basing your view on old information
    10
  6.  @DrenoshGaming  Stealth does not exist . S400 s500 can track any aircraft . They have been doing it in the Middle East in regard to f35 F22 is obsolete though a good aircraft when fighting inferior opponents. But Russian missiles are far superior in speed and range F22 and f35 will not be entering any war with Russia .
    9
  7.  @MichaelScheele  How do you know the su57 cant get a target lock on a f22…..? Perhaps Research the subject more
    6
  8.  @hitmixhyepock9405  Russian hypersonic missiles can hit anywhere against any target and easily out distances any missile the Americans have . The f22 and f35 can be seen by Russian radar .
    6
  9.  @ethanashley2141  Russia was dropping 150 glide bombs a day and hundreds of sorties . There was no fly zone except the one created by Russia
    6
  10.  @procommunistdestruction2318  Four days for everything ? It took you 20 years to fight and lose to the Taliban
    5
  11.  @loftiestchaf423  They are using them in Ukraine . A lot more than one with more coming
    5
  12.  @MichaelScheele  Don’t worry they can do it .Do the airfields and carriers the f22 uses stealthy ? Because they will be the first things targeted in a war. Fighting Iraq or Libya is not like fighting Russia . Nato made a huge mistake
    5
  13. Yes they are using it in Ukraine . The question is has the f22 and f35 been tested in high intensity war ? No America makes weapons for profit Russia makes them to work . Russian weapons manufacturing capacity inherited from the Soviet Union is massive . Manufacturing in the west is tiny by comparison. eg . American production of artillery shells 200,000 a year . Russian production of shells 4.5 million
    5
  14. Russian missiles and air defence systems s400 s400 more than 10 years ahead . In Vietnam the Vietcong were using Russia air defence . End result America lost 10,000 aircraft . Ukraine had an airforce of 300 planes before the war . How many now ? 0
    4
  15. The f22 uses the Aim120 air to air missile . Speed Mach 1. Range 160 kms SU57. Uses R37m. Speed . Mach 6. Range 400 kms The f22 won’t even get close
    4
  16.  @DrenoshGaming How do you know if they are superior ?
    4
  17.  @hitmixhyepock9405  The f22 will not reach the battle field . S400 s500 will see it
    4
  18. Russia is years ahead in missile technology and air defence technology
    3
  19. The Ukrainians have ( or had ) Russian air defence the s300 .A very capable system even though it’s old . If su57 had problems with the s300 and it’s possible . So would the f22 and f35
    3
  20.  @hitmixhyepock9405  How do you “ sneek up “ up on an aircraft with double the range . And ground air defence with even longer range
    3
  21.  @procommunistdestruction2318  Not that good ? Military experts disagree
    2
  22.  @procommunistdestruction2318  Poor analogy
    2
  23. Forget what Ukrainians say about shoot downs . They never substantiate anything . Fantasists
    2
  24.  @Texas.T  What wars? Wars against countries eg Afghanistan , Iraq , Libya with no air defences
    2
  25.  @chugachuga9242  Who were the f15 flying against ? We are talking fifth generation versus fifth generation . In 2023 Russia produced 230 aircraft . How many did America produce ? American doctrine is all about fighting low intensity war . A war with Russia will not be low intensity. America totally unprepared for such war
    2
  26.  @pooferfish2850  the f22 and f35 have never been tested against quality air defence . Su57 not needed in Ukraine same for Russian advanced weapons . That is why they are not used much . Any American aircraft fifth generation or fourth will not survive against advanced air defence . And their platforms airfields and carriers easily targeted by missiles .
    2
  27.  @pooferfish2850  Who have the American fighters fought of late ? Countries with no air defence and in most cases no airforce either So what is you get a 100 to 0 kill rate against a poor opponent. Proves nothing Russia fighting a country ( Ukraine ) that has good air defence . America has never done that . During the Vietnam war America lost 10,000 aircraft
    2
  28.  @Ashan581  Most drones were shot down and they are pinpricks that don’t affect the battle situation at all . If my memory serves me a Chinese weather balloon defeated the entire American air defences a while back? A jet fighter a little easier to see Can you compare drone damage to Russia with what’s going on in Ukraine at the moment as far as damage goes ?
    1
  29.  @Ashan581  What happened on 9/11 ? Where were American air defence ? Nowhere
    1
  30.  @Ashan581  What damage done to kremlin ….?
    1
  31.  @Ashan581  What I’m saying is that no air defence is 100%. What damage has been done to Russia in air attacks and what damage has been done to Ukraine by comparison by the Russians ? Chalk and cheese America has a poor record in war even against weak enemies . So they are in no position to judge another countries war effort
    1
  32.  @Ashan581  drones are harder to spot on radar than aircraft because they fly low . But 99% of drones have been shot down by the Russians . On a Military level it made no difference .
    1
  33.  @Ashan581  But if America was at war the Chinese weather balloon could have been something more sinister . And the incompetence by American air defence on 9/11 was way worse than a tiny drone flying over the kremlin .
    1
  34.  @Ashan581  America lost 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam to an enemy with no airforce . The British lost 6 warships in ten weeks in the Falklands war . America just lost a war in Afghanistan to an enemy with virtually no weapons at all
    1
  35.  @thatonecrackhead2728  War is politics . You fight a war to achieve a political goal . If you don’t achieve that you have lost. The Americans were also there to protect poppy fields The retreat from Afghanistan by the Americans chaos and Disaster with troops being killed . It looked like military defeat to me
    1
  36. You will be in for a shock in a real war . You are basing your view on war games lol . When you have hypersonic missiles no need for stealth They can’t be stopped .zircon Sarmat are not hypersonic ballistic missiles ,wrong Pinocchio
    1
  37.  @dominickleonardi  True hypersonic missiles don’t leave the atmosphere . So they are not ballistic arch. But Russia has zircon , Sarmat that are not ballistic hypersonic . They are new technology true hypersonic . More advanced than anything America has . Kinzhal is more advanced than anything America has. It is classified as hypersonic by other countries too
    1
  38.  @chugachuga9242  No one is stealthy .. all aircraft can be seen by modern Russian radar
    1
  39.  @Onezmhu  Russian missiles still faster Mach 6 . And far longer range. S400 range 400 kms s500 600 kms also . F22 and f35 won’t get close to target . And the platforms they use eg airfields and carriers will be targets Stealth is overrated . The Russians have been tracking f22 or f35 in the Middle East for some time . Stealth is a sales pitch
    1
  40.  @Texas.T  The s300 is still very capable . Whatever the su57 is vulnerable too all other fighters would be as well .
    1
  41.  @chugachuga9242  Russian radar would pick up the f22 very quickly . When Israel f35=flies near Russian bases in Syria they are easily tracked . Stealth is nonsense when flying against advanced air systems
    1
  42.  @Ashan581  su57 air to air missiles Mach 6 . And 400 kms range . F22 good but will get taken out from a distance . Luck not needed
    1
  43.  @thatonecrackhead2728  Russia has way more advanced air systems than s300 . But it was saying that even an old soviet system from the 80s can still be effective
    1
  44.  @pacmon5285  why don’t you argue with my numbers ? You can’t so you have to resort to name calling
    1
  45.  @loftiestchaf423  You are wrong and going on old information . Russia uses Russian made parts including computer chips What else it needs it get from China . You don’t think Russia would launch an operation while being dependent on the west for anything militarily, economically do you ? No one is that stupid A true winning army doesn’t take more losses than the opposition . You are correct . That is why you know russia is taking less losses . Because they are winning
    1
  46. America is 34 trillion in debt . They can’t afford a bicycle in reality . Just print money while they are bankrupt
    1
  47.  @Onezmhu  Su57 longer range and faster air to air missiles . Will take out the f22 at long distance The days of dog fights are over
    1
  48.  @Ashan581  A few drones which were shot down in most cases are irrelevant . Most of the damage ( insignificant damage ) was downed drones hitting residential areas . No Military significant at all . America lost 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam war . And the Serbs brought down an American supposed stealth bomber with an old s200 in 1999 People in glass houses
    1
  49.  @pooferfish2850  let’s face it America chooses it enemies eg Iraq , Afghanistan ,Libya . And always chooses countries that can’t fight back They have made a big mistake with Russia
    1
  50.  @maeckknox6535  The f22 would have to worry about getting past the s400 first . Which it won’t
    1
  51.  @maeckknox6535  The f22 will be noticed early on by the s400 and s500 . The su57 will not be needed
    1
  52.  @chugachuga9242  You need to learn more about Russian weapons . They are superior on many levels . The platforms the f22s use ( airfields and carriers are not stealthy . They will be easily seen and destroyed .
    1
  53.  @chugachuga9242  The American airfields and carriers the f22 take off from are not stealth and can been seen well enough to destroy . Which will be the case in a war . If Russia sinks a carrier it will destroy dozens of f22s and f35s in one hit
    1
  54.  @chugachuga9242  . But Russia has far superior air defence and are fighting on their own land . A massive advantage . How do you think the woke American people will take to being under direct attack for the first time in their history . It will make 9/11 look like a tiff
    1
  55. People forget that Russia has hypersonic stealth missiles like the Khinzhal. The west has no match for these missiles . Many more variants too.
    1
  56.  @Onezmhu  out of those 1000 f35s only 300 are serviceable . Su57 long range high speed Mach 6 ) air to air missiles easily outperform any air to air missiles in speed and range the f22 f35 have .. max range for aim120 is 160 kms. Longest range for r37m that the su57 carries is 400 kms F22 f35 have to fly 240 kms to even get within range . All the time wide open to attack from Russias s400 and s500 on the ground If I was an American pilot I would refuse to fly . Pure suicide
    1
  57.  @chugachuga9242  Khinzhal 10 Mach . Iskander 6 Mach . Not the same missile
    1
  58.  @chugachuga9242  what study ? You are making things up . The patriot the Saudis had couldn’t shoot down old scuds fired from Yemen .let alone hypersonic missile . Patriot success rate 36% . Very poor Where as it proven itself ? Certainly not in Ukraine the Russians are bombing the hell out of it
    1
  59.  @chugachuga9242  I looked it up . Propaganda . No evidence to prove it was a Khinzhal . They showed wreckage of the supposed Kinzhal shot down on CNN . It was clearly not a Khinzhal The war between Saudi Arabia and Yemen was quite recently not in the 70s Hundreds of successful intercepts ? Where . Most countries America has fought in the last decades have had no missiles . The odd scud maybe . America is still using old rubbish like tomahawk cruise missiles and minute man missiles from the 60s. They are way behind Russia in the missile technology
    1
  60.  @chugachuga9242  The patriots are brilliant.Goodness knows how the Russians are able to bomb the hell out of Ukraine . I don’t get it
    1
  61.  @chugachuga9242  Yes the patriot is brilliant . And I know it shot down a hypersonic missile because CNN told me . And they never lie 🤣🤣
    1
  62.  @chugachuga9242  I listen to everyone . And where is your evidence for any of your claims ? The Saudi Yemen war was just recently not in the 90s. If patriots work how come Ukraine is being bombed into oblivion?
    1
  63.  @chugachuga9242  what studies and what successful intercepts ? Lol
    1
  64.  @chugachuga9242  A 10 Mach missile . hypersonic glide vehicles are not ballistic arch weapons. They are brand new technology and have no counter. Far too unpredictable and too fast to intercept Chuga. Ukraine is being devastated by the Russian missiles as we speak Chuga Where are all those patriots and calculus? Lol
    1
  65. The f35 has been fraught with problems . It’s a lemon and badly designed aerodynamically Russia plans on having nearly 200 of them at some point. And with Russian massive manufacturing capacity it won’t be that long I have heard they have 80 of them . Hard to verify anything
    1
  66. The Americans have yet to use any of their aircraft in high intensity war . Whatever problems the Russians are having in Ukraine in regard to air defence the Americans would have . If the Ukrainians can shoot down a su57 they can shoot down a f22
    1
  67. Russian air to air missiles that su57 carries are generations ahead of anything the Americans have
    1