Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

  1.  @autobootpiloot wrong . Russia is getting 30,000 / 50,000 volunteers a month . That is the bulk of the army not conscripts . Russia only conscripted 300,000 a year ago . And only those with previous military experience
    20
  2.  @brucewayne363  that wasn’t a war . Iraq had no air defence , airforce or modern weapons . A child could have beaten them
    9
  3.  @JoannDavi America showed how good they were in Afghanistan . Humiliating retreat like in Vietnam . Russias showing how patient they are
    8
  4.  @Art-is-craft  Britain is a non player in military matters . 70,000 troops. 250 tanks . 400 obsolete aircraft . 60 ships half in dry dock because of no spare parts . It’s laughable . And they want to fight Russia lol
    7
  5.  @BigAlCapwn Britain WW2 is a far cry from Britain 2024 militarily
    6
  6.  @Taskandpurpose Poland and Germany are also poodles with a poor military
    5
  7.  @coltonconner782  But with inferior delivery systems and air defence . And if you are in the Uk a country so small one missile could take it out . Best not to contemplate such silliness It’s touching to see you think Ukraine is worth dying for and destroying the planet . When dialogue would end the nato provoked conflict in a day . Let’s face it is Russia on your border or are you on theirs ? The west is on theirs they are the aggressor
    5
  8.  @captainawesome9458  They haven’t won a World Cup for 58 years . They can’t play that either
    5
  9.  @Youtube_is_Trash  It would make no difference . Ukraine is done
    4
  10.  My_pfp_beats_all_dog_breeds.  you lost 50 battles in Vietnam and lost control. You retreated in panic and humiliation . Your people are not against war . They have funded and cheerled many more after Vietnam . And lost all of them
    4
  11.  @swann67000  Britain 60 ships 30 are in dry dock because of no spare parts . Russia 600 ships including 70 submarines armed with hypersonic long range missiles ( 10,000 km range ) Britain has 400 aircraft with obsolete technology . Not powerful when facing s400. Incapable of enforcing air superiority Britain and France need to forget the idea .
    4
  12. The Russians have been “ messing “ pretty well against American made technology . Especially Himars , ATACMs and patriot Also a nice selection Abrams and Bradley’s on display in Moscow too
    3
  13. The trouble with the “ plan “ is that America can never out produce Russia and China in weapons , ammunition , raw materials and manpower . Next America has no way of getting men and equipment across the Atlantic without their convoys being sunk with Russian and Chinese Long range hypersonic missiles fired from either surface ships or submarines. Back to the drawing board
    3
  14. A third of Russias Black Sea fleet sunk .? That would be 13 ships . Can you name them ?
    3
  15.  @JoannDavi  The war is a land war not a naval war . No need for ships hence their limited use . Ask the Ukrainians how poor the Russian airforce is 😁
    3
  16.  @apterachallenge Nato couldn’t beat the Taliban and their nukes and delivery systems are obsolete
    3
  17.  @brucewayne363  Proportionate escalation that failed badly . And America had to flee in disgrace
    3
  18.  @BlatentlyFakeName  Russian national debt 380 billion . America national debt 34 trillion . Russian household debt 500 billion. American household debt 17.3 trillion . Who’s in trouble ? Not Russia
    3
  19.  @simpleviewer1334  The Russian tanks in the Ukraine army come from when Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union . lol
    2
  20.  @Aito_porojääkäri  The Ukrainian war was a civil war at one point before the SMO
    2
  21. France is not prepared for war . They just got kicked out of Africa now they want a war with Russia . They need to get medical help
    2
  22. 200,000 shells are about a weeks supply in a high intensity conflict . Where the Russians are firing 50,000 on a busy day
    2
  23.  @America-mf7tf  nato couldn’t beat the Taliban
    2
  24. Only a fraction of the aid will go to Ukraine and even less on weapons . Another scam for the weapons industry
    2
  25. But the su22 is 60 years old. How can anyone boast about the outcome of the dog fight . In fact the su22 pilot was the one with all the courage
    2
  26.  RifleEyez  who said three days ? Give me a link 😅😅
    2
  27.  @Art-is-craft  the S400 is the most advanced air defence in the world. Success percentage 91%. Patriot success rate 36%. Britain has no Military 70,000 men, 250+ tanks 250 pieces of.artillery , 60 ships 400 aircraft is not a serious military Russia 1.2 million soon to be 1.5 million . 14,000 pieces of artillery, 13000 tanks 600 ships 4000 aircraft . That is a serious army Russia 7000 nukes . Russian army is largely professional soldiers and volunteers . Russia has hypersonic missiles the west does not . Su 57 more than a match for f35. British planes are just going to fly around killing Russians ? This is not Iraq where there was no air defence . Such delusions by the British could lead to WW3. As Putin said “ TRY IT “
    2
  28.  @swann67000  What could match Russian SU 57 . Zircon hypersonic missiles. S400, s500 . The answer is nothing Britain or France has Britain and France have never experienced high intensity war . Fighting the Iraqi army and the Taliban don’t count Britain just got kicked out of Afghanistan along with the Americans . France just got the boot from Africa
    2
  29.  @coltonconner782  Except Russia is not losing . Name your 22 nd century tech and equipment..? Why didn’t they use it in Afghanistan The American weapons you see in movies aren’t real you know …… And american leadership and tactics are definitely 20th century And remember name those 22th century high tech American weapons . Give me two air defence systems , one so called sixth generation aircraft and one tank . Oh and a hypersonic missile .Weapons that have been tested in combat🤭🤭
    2
  30.  @BlatentlyFakeName  Yes Britain is impregnable . The Romans , Normans and Vikings never invaded and occupied Britain for centuries 🤣🤣
    2
  31.  @BlatentlyFakeName  it would actually be easier to take now . The UK has no serious military anymore
    2
  32.  @BlatentlyFakeName  Russia defaulted because the sanctions closed down payment routes for them. They got around the sanctions by paying in roubles . Nothing to do with them being unable to pay .. Americas is merely paying the interest off their debt . They are not paying back anything . The debt continues to rise
    2
  33.  @BlatentlyFakeName  Russia still has 500 billion dollars in western assets in Russia . They can seize them if necessary. Many corporations still do business in Russia . A million ways to get around the sanctions. Companies pulling out are replaced by local companies. Increasing Russias economic independence. Another backfire Credit ratings are nonsense . America had a triple A rating just weeks before the 2008 crash Russia is no longer part of the system they don’t have a credit rating
    2
  34.  @andytomhall6006  They will mark no difference . Russia has already won
    2
  35. YES AND AMERICA RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF THEM
    1
  36. There is no civil war in Russia . One in America though
    1
  37.  @Aito_porojääkäri  To the Russians it’s not full scale war . If it was the Ukraine government would be dead .all government buildings , command and control centres , electric grid , rail system and telecommunications all destroyed . And Russia would have used its entire army not just a fraction of it
    1
  38.  @TheGBaltar  The source of my idiocy is my own commonsense. . And I know the difference between what Russia actually did and what they are capable of . And they could have taken zelenski out anytime they liked . ( and still could ) but why do that . He may be replaced by someone better And I know the size of the Russian army and know how much they used .( 10% Now give me source of your idiocy ..
    1
  39. I think China and North Korea will be happy to supply Russia a few million troops if needed . What did Clint Eastwood say “ make my day punk “
    1
  40. The Poles are totally unprepared for serious war with anyone
    1
  41. There are no defences because the money for them was frittered away by corruption . The war is one big scam ,money laundering
    1
  42. Guaranteed a nuclear response from Russia . Though 800,000 woke troops in make up , high heels and safe spaces is the equivalent of about 10,000 “ orthodox “troops
    1
  43.  @JoannDavi The west showed how Hopeless their “ game changing “ weapons are . Himars, patriot , leopards , Bradley , Abrams, and soon f16s. All ended up as scrap metal . No country will be buying western weapons in a hurry
    1
  44.  @JGM1800  Russia is not at war this is a limited operation using a fraction of the Russian army within the confines of Russia law . Nato as neither the troops , , ammunition , manufacturing , logistics , weapons , battle field experience in modern warfare and political will to go to war with Russia . It would be over very quickly . The surrounding countries have Little to threaten Russia . Nato is 90% America . Forget the surrounding countries they wouldn’t last two weeks in a war with Russia
    1
  45.  @Youtube_is_Trash  There are no weapons or ammunition . Just money to be laundered
    1
  46. And how did it end for Germany ?
    1
  47. Nato has neither the weapons , ammunition battle experience or manufacturing to sustain a war for more than a few weeks Also I think China and North Korea would be happy to loan Russia a couple of million troops if needed
    1
  48.  @juicymelodic  Finance doesn’t matter nato weapons are heavily over priced . Russian weapons very cheap to make . When you say nato you mean America . .Take America out and there is no nato . Russia has the biggest land army on Earth and the most advanced missiles , air defence and nuclear forces Most of nato strength is in America . Try and get men and equipment across the Atlantic during a war . Good luck with that Nato doesn’t have the manufacturing capacity of Russia , China and North Korea to sustain high intensity war for more than a few weeks But America has no experience in modern high intensity war . In past wars against weak enemies the Americans just bombed everything That will not work against modern air defences
    1
  49.  @juicymelodic  Expensive doesn’t mean better weapons . Ukraine has the help of 40 countries and Russia is not using its full forces . The SMO is a limited operation . Russian missiles are useless ? 75 % of the Ukrainian grid and infrastructure is down and its army decimated . Seems the missiles work just fine America has little manufacturing . 700 missiles produced in a year 150 tanks . 500,000 artillery shells . Russia 7800 missiles a year 1500 tanks and three million artillery shells . And America is 90% of nato “ stealth missiles “ lol . Americans use aim 120 air to air missiles range 160 kms spreed 1 Mach . Russian R37 missile range 400 kms . Mach 6 . Game over
    1
  50.  @leonardgmiller8924  A million troops without equipment, ammunition , fuel , which would take a year to prepare are just infantry You had better worry about what Putin says . He could wipe out any army that enters Ukraine with either conventional or nuclear weapons Do you think western leaders are going to risk that ? lol
    1