General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Trevor Crook
Military Summary
comments

Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "Military Summary" channel.

@benjammin3381 ukraine is destroyed how is that helping ? You want to help you make Ukraine negotiate two years ago . Nato was using Ukraine to try and destroy Russia . They failed
43
Evil homosexual
26
@ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub Nato attacked Russia using Ukraine as its proxy . Bad move
22
@MegaAsmodey the Russians are saving their best troops for Kiev. Those prisoners are kicking ass though
21
@redscope897 But the Kherson front was when Russia only had 160,000 troops in Ukraine at the time . Now they have 600,000 and total air dominance . Russia has not declared war on Ukraine this is a limited operation only In a war things would be different . Much more destruction . Ukraine would be flattened
19
@eliascharisis9556 Ukraine had 40 million now 18 million . People have fled to avoid the war
17
@vrijsenwouter Virtually all reputable analysts accept Russian sources more likely true than not . That Russia is winning is very obvious
17
@duncansmith7576 why would Russia break the Minsk agreement . It was between ukraine and the Donbass regions not Russia ? If Ukraine is of no value to nato militarily why were they in Ukraine and bringing in weapons training the Ukraine army . Nothing you say adds up
16
@S1nuDTFY America air to air missile Aim 120 used by all American advanced fighters range 160kms speed Mach 1 RT37 air to air missile used by Russian advanced fighters . Range 400 kms speed Mach 6 Does that look like western weapons are superior ? Next we can compare air defence systems and surface to Surface missiles if you like ? 😁
12
@Nothing_to_write0 Russia acts within the Geneva convention . Ukraine breached the Minsk agreement and now suffer the consequences
12
The patience of Russia is unbelievable with all this provocation
9
@Jin-1337 Ukraine breached the Minsk agreement breached the Istanbul treaty . Of course Ukraine is to blame
8
@BENDEL420 Russia didn’t attack nuclear facilities
8
@user-jg6bd7se8u If the Russians were occupying the nuclear plant how can they attack it ?😁
8
@mikael.wilhelm Memorandums are not legally binding The fact that German reunification happened, one condition of the agreement that you say never existed, that was concrete evidence that there was a verbal agreement . But only Russia honoured the agreement The declassification of the documentation from that meeting confirms it
7
⁠ @dWFnZWVr According to an American general Russia is much stronger now than before the war . The Russian army now has 1.2 million troops expanding to 1.5 million by the middle of 2024 Weapons production has massively increased already replacing weapons lost on the battle fired Also the Russian economy is stronger You fail to see that Russia has not declared full scale war and only had one part mobilisation They have only used 10% to15% of its military power in theSMO Why hasn’t nato entered the war directly if Russia was weaker now . .? What you say doesn’t add up
7
Russia has the overwhelming advantage in fire power and air power . War is very mathematical and your numbers don’t add up You can say anything but if it’s not true it makes absolutely no difference to the facts on the ground . Like believing you have a million dollars in the bank but you have $ 3.00.
6
The storm shadows are totally ineffective
6
@mikael.wilhelm It was a verbal agreement which was recorded in print . You can read the meeting text online. Verbal agreements are legally binding . Even without an agreement moving towards Russia is a stupid idea and threat to the world Part of the agreement between Russia and the west was that Russia allow Germany to be reunified . German reunification is proof there was an agreement Even when something is in writing it isn’t necessarily legally binding . The Budapest memorandum for instance was not legally binding according to the Americans . Written memorandums are not legally binding. Whereas verbal agreements are BTW . The first ones to breach the Budapest memorandum were the Americans when they breached Ukrainian sovereignty by staging a coup in 2014
5
@RobinHarris-nf4yv Russia is losing ? 🤭
5
Russia doesn’t seem to be doing much in Kursk
5
@Daniel-vw7mw It is a Russo nato war
5
How much further to the Dneiper ?
4
Well it’s about time Russia woke up
4
The Americans only get off the couch when they want a beer or a doughnut
4
Nato can’t save itself let alone Ukraine
4
@michalzajic2555 The Istanbul agreement is established fact . The details of it are online. . The losses of both sides were in the leaked pentagon papers confirmed by Mediazona. Ukraine losses according to the pentagon seven times higher than Russias
4
@MegaAsmodey it was part of the Istanbul peace agreement. There was no major battle in Kiev
4
@exyugo made it home safely after achieving nothing
4
@andyglastonbury6032 Memorandums are not legally binding . The Budapest memorandum was based on Ukraine being a peaceful neighbour . Which they were obviously not . So Russian invasion can be interpreted as legal
4
@ Nato will not take one step eastwards . The words are written down in black and white. You can find the documents online These days Nato doesn’t have the manufacturing capacity, raw materials , advanced weapons , tactics or political will to be a serious threat to Russia
4
@oconnem1 Deaths of civilians in this conflict very low . 10,000 according to UN. Ukraine should have abided by the Istanbul agreement then know war
4
@TheRealBillBob Wagner was supported by Russian artillery and air power and were under the orders of Russia . Without that they wouldn’t have taken Bahkmut . They are just infantry
3
@thestealisreal3734 Putin just got voted in . Not dictator . Maybe the west should mind their own business
3
@FBugle Political prisoners in America Jan 6 protestors . Persecution of Trump . Assange
3
So that justifies liras murder ?
3
Ukraines negotiating position is weaker now than it was a year ago
3
I think it is obvious that Russia are fighting Nato forces directly . Sheep dipped Nato troops dressed as Ukrainians
3
@Valarmorgolis German reunification is actually concrete evidence that there was an agreement. Russia fulfilled its part of the agreement the west did not Wilhelm brings up that old chestnut the Budapest memorandum which was a written agreement but not legally binding . So Wilhelms claim that only written agreements are legally binding is nonsense Verbal agreements are binding . The fact that half of the agreement was actually carried out ( German reunification ) is evidence that an agreement was not only reached but partially implemented. Wilhelm will never accept this because it destroys his false narrative about Russia being in the wrong . Russiaphobia on full display
3
The west is truly evil
3
Russia could have done this two years ago
3
@JayBirdal-bs5lz About 70,000 Russia dead . Over 600,000 Ukraine losses . So your number is correct but attributed to the wrong side . Russia was willing to give all the land they had taken back through the Istanbul agreement. So your claims about Russian imperialism is nonsense . Imperialists don’t give land back The Istanbul agreement is established fact its details easily accessible Russian losses were 60,000 according to the leaked Pentagon papers confirmed by Mediazona. Pentagon also said Ukraine losses seven times higher than Russias Michael Zajic
3
@michalzajic2555 The Pentagon is my source for the respective losses of both sides . and the details of the Istanbul agreement freely available online
3
@atsstaaatsssatss4501 I will tell you the difference . In a war Russia would have taken out the Ukraine leadership . There would have been no foreign politicians or celebs visiting Kiev . All government buildings , all command and control centres , electric grid , telecommunications Water supply , bridges , rail system would have been destroyed . And instead of going in with 200,000 troops Russian would have gone in with 750,000. See the difference to what has actually taken place ?
3
@andyglastonbury6032 The main working language in Ukraine is Russian . All major cities Kiev , Odessa were founded by the Russians . Lvov was Polish
3
@Daniel-vw7mw if Putin wanted all of Europe he wouldn’t be in Ukraine he would have gone through Belarus straight into Poland . Much easier route. Your claim is nonsense
3
@Daniel-vw7mw Ukraine can Punch back but there will be consequences. Remember Russia is being very restrained in this conflict that could change
3
The new Argentina president is a fraud . Pro globalist and WEF
3
What are you basing that view on . .?
3
@ussindianapolis487 There is already a no fly zone over Ukraine
2
The fall of the fourth Reich
2
@blasuswelshcakes2595 Because Russia is no danger to Russia
2
So you are saying that Ukraine is no better than Russia ?
2
The little green men were Ukraine troops who changed sides
2
nothing substantiated . Just numbers they make up
2
When do the fortified areas stop and there is open terrain ?
2
@joethekinghawk7514 So Russia could make a clean sweep
2
@jackburgess8579 What they are doing now is active defence . A recognised military tactic . And they have done it quite well Certainly better than the American tactics in Afghanistan
2
Dead man talking
2
@atsstaaatsssatss4501 That is easily explained . Only an idiot would think that Russia or anyone else could take an entire country in three days . Especially a large country with a large army . And whoever said they were going to do that . Names and sources please ? There was no major battle in Kiev . Russia only had 40,000 troops around Kiev . It would take 200,000 to take a city that big . Russia withdrew its troops as part of the Istanbul agreement Russian troops withdrew from Kherson and kharkov because they were short of troops . You could call it tactical retreat or a tactical defeat But as you see they are slowly taking that territory back
2
@buzby78 The Ukrainians did it three times
2
@andyglastonbury6032 Ukraine was part of the Russian empire and then the Soviet Union . It has always been dependent on Russia and now it’s dependent on the west
2
@upstairs1307 Well it was very unfair that the Indians etc were dispossessed and they have a moral right to have their land back . But that will never happen . Even more unfairness . But that’s life Life is survival of the fittest regardless of all the virtue signalling .
2
@randysavage1 500 years ago the Incas had an empire . What does that have to do with anything . Crimea was given to Ukraine in 1954 by the Russians . He that giveth can also take it back Ukraine was totally dependent on the soviets . After the break up of the Soviet Union Ukraine became dependent on Russia . Now they are dependent on the west . Parasitical
2
@randysavage1 As an independent state it only 33 years old . It will soon be a failed state and divided up between Russia , Poland and Hungary . They should have abided by the Istanbul agreement
2
@carlbervin8183 Russia has the legal right to protect Russian citizens even if they are in another country. That is in keeping with the UN charter. Was it legal for nato to destroy Libya ..? . The west is in no position to point the finger at anyone It was Ukraines Choice to tear up the Istanbul peace treaty . They bare full responsibility for the position they are now in
2
@carlbervin8183 They didn’t invade Georgia they made an incursion and quickly left when the Job was done . Georgia was the aggressor Law can be interpreted any way you like .
2
@carlbervin8183 According to the UN charter preemptive attack is legal in certain situations on a countries border . Russia acted within that UN law
2
What point crossing a river with no heavy weapons . Stupid idea
2
@duncansmith7576 Russia has allies like America . America has more allies than Russia . Russia produces most of its own weapons and ammunition . Russia is giving the countries you mention weapons actually . Especially Iran ( it was in even the western media ) so you have it the wrong way round . Russia is a massive weapons manufacturer. It has no real need for weapons from elsewhere
1
@nuggetella I lived as usual . Never wore a mask . Never took a PCR test. Never took the junk . Never believed a word governments or media said about anything . I’m still here . Sadly some people I knew who believed the BS aren’t
1
@thestealisreal3734 The communists are a bigger threat to Putin than anyone else . Navalny had no support
1
@HagueFugitive America jailing Jan 6 protectors , Persecution of trump ,torture of Assange are hallmarks of fascism
1
@FBugle Bugle . You never explained how America and Canada are going to transport raw materials , men and equipment across the Atlantic during your fantasy war with Russia . Please explain kiddo?
1
@ClimateScepticSceptic-ub2rg actually according to the BBC Russian deaths are 38.000. Russian economy one of the few countries who have economic growth this year America and Europe officially in recession You don’t know much mate
1
@SpringGrom Slowly waking up. When they are fully awake Nato better run
1
Russia has been pussy footing around for far too long . That is the reason for attacks like this they are perceived as weak . This encourages more attacks
1
@ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub it was effective in Ukraine losing hundreds of troops
1
@lordfeeda9627 . They will have throw that ammunition at the Russians they’ll be out of weapons soon
1
@Thagorraki they will be known as the couch people
1
@joethekinghawk7514 agreed
1
@Driver-ur9mf The Murder Brigade in Moscow versus The Murder Brigade in Washington . If Russia was into killing civilians they could have killed a million by now not the 10,000 that have actually died ( UN numbers ) When you break peace agreements what do you expect the other side to do .? It has escalated because the west escalated it by sending more weapons and not urged negotiation . Russia warned the west that nato expansion to the Russian border would result in conflict but they didn’t listen
1
@Driver-ur9mf War is not murder legally . Russia was forced into defending their strategic interests and border caused by nato expansion
1
@TheRealBillBob denied by Russia
1
What is Russia doing leaving that city vulnerable to attack . Pussy footing around for two years is the cause of this disaster
1
Nato troops are fighting with Ukraine troops . Where are all the drones coming from ..? Russia has a long way to go for victory. They are disappointing
1
@atsstaaatsssatss4501 . I can’t see that I have anything to cope with . Maybe you can tell me?
1
@atsstaaatsssatss4501 I wouldn’t call it an invasion more of an intervention or policing action. And BTW Russia would have needed five times the number of troops they had to take Kiev . That’s how you know they never intended to take it
1
@chrissmith7669 Oh my . Temporarily occupied territory by the Russians for at least a 1000 years
1
@andyglastonbury6032 What treaties gave Ukrainians ownership of anything . It’s boundaries were not even recognised Russia will take the land they need . In time Ukraine will go back to Russia voluntarily. As Ukraine will be a failed state and no way to survive
1
@andyglastonbury6032 whose going to take territory away from Russia ?what they take they will keep and incorporate into Russia . No one can prevent it West Ukraine will be divided up between Poland and Hungary with Russias blessing
1
@carlbervin8183 Georgia attacked Russian peace keepers in South Ossetia . A naked act of aggression. Russia like in Ukraine only used a fraction of its army and then left when the job was done . Ukraine was hosting nato and shelling Russian speakers in the east since 2014. According to the UN charter ( responsibility to protect ) resolution . Now would you like a list of American illegal wars ?
1
@carlbervin8183 Putin tried for peace but was given no choice . Ukraine breached the Minsk agreement and tore up the Istanbul peace treaty . Now they are doomed . Whether the invasion is legal or not is purely a matter of opinion
1
@buzby78 Because the Donbass is pro Russian . We know this because during past elections in Ukraine ( pre 2014 coup ) that area voted overwhelmingly for pro Russian candidates
1
Russia has shown itself to be weak in the Syrian conflict . Very poor indeed . They should leave Syria before they are over run They have shamed themselves
1
@benjammin3381 The Americans were building biological weapons labs on the Russian border. Same if not worse than nukes
1
nato has neither the manpower, weapons , weapons manufacturing capacity, raw materials , political will or leadership to be a serious threat to any major power
1
If there is no change in government Germany is kaput
1
@schepvogelk5971 America is a two party dictatorship . The term is meaningless . There is no such thing as true democracy in the west
1
Trump ok’d the money to Ukraine. He is a lying douche
1
@JayJay-ky6dd According to the BBC based on death notices since the start of the war Russian losses KIA stand at 40,000. Ukraine losses are over 400,000 KIA. Russias goal isn’t to move west . What would they gain by invading a bankrupt EU with no natural sources or manufacturing It’s pure conspiracy theory
1
@Daniel-vw7mw he was trolling on Twitter . Russia has no need for Europe . It lacks natural resources ,manufacturing and is bankrupt with a hostile population . Why would anyone want it ? And the repeated claims by the west that the Russian army is weak ,most of it destroyed .how is Russia going to invade anyone ? 😁
1
@Daniel-vw7mw Why would he want Europe ? No manufacturing, no natural resources , bankrupt with a hostile population. And if Russia wanted to invade Europe they wouldn’t go through Ukraine . Going through Belarus be much easier . Look at a map
1
Everything by Paul Craig Roberts about escalation because of Putins slow operation seem to be spot on
1
@Daniel-vw7mw They can punch back but there will be consequences. And when you “ punch back “ deliberately targeting civilians as Ukraine does you are committing war crimes. If Ukraine was smart they would have abided by the Minsk agreement or gone through with the Istanbul agreement. And then there would have been no war . They foolishly chose war. Now they are doomed
1
@dWFnZWVr They are stronger materially they have increases production in all areas . In 2023 they produced 230 aircraft . Easily replacing losses . Compared to the west who has outsourced its manufacturing . That is why Ukraine is low on ammunition . The west doesn’t have the means to supply it Russia is using older equipment mainly because why use your newer stuff when you don’t have too The west has neither the weapons ,men nor manufacturing to sustain high intensity conflict for more than a few weeks . And no experience in such war
1
@dWFnZWVr Russia produces many more than three a day . 1500 tanks a year . Refurbished and new They have the biggest tank factory on earth in the Urals They have lost 39 ships in the Black Sea then .. ? name 10 that were sunk . Ships have names you know Russia produces its own ammunition . 4.5 million a year . Some from North Korea . But the majority are from Russia Russia cranked up production capacity after the war had started not before it . According to the pentagon Russia is stronger now than before the war You must also remember that Russia is only using a small part of its army in Ukraine . 10% . The rest remain in Russia And remember give me the names of 10 of the ships out of your claim that the entire Black Sea fleet was sunk . You should be a comedy writer
1
@dWFnZWVr Aid won’t matter , Ukraine needs men and weapons . Which they will never get to any meaningful level
1
@dWFnZWVr A year or so ahead ? Make that 10 in some areas eg air defence , missiles and man power
1
@dWFnZWVr Hypersonic missiles are new so any used will of course be new . Russia is stockpiling all kinds of weapons including modern missiles . That’s why they use so few in Ukraine . No need to use them it would be a waste Ukraine is not the enemy nato is. That’s who Russias advanced weapons are for The west is well behind in modern weapons . Lumbering and very sinkable ships are obsolete , especially carriers American planes would not survive the s400 s500 etc either . And American missiles are mostly subsonic . And try and get anything across the ocean with Russian subs armed with hypersonic missiles everywhere
1
@dWFnZWVr What are you basing your views on Russian stockpiles on . .? What are your sources . The same sources that told you the Black Sea fleet no longer exists ..? And you still cannot name any of the Russian ships sunk . If the 39 ships of the Black Sea fleet are no more . Name a few ?
1
@banta-pd8zj who predicted that . Not Russia . It would have been better for Ukraine if the war had finished then . Now they are doomed
1
Russia needs to do thing every night for a few weeks
1