Comments by "" (@efghggdxlmfn33) on "NEW Tactic! Musicians Rolling Through BAKHMUT" video.

Why are you clowns repeating the same outdated narratives?
3
@Ofasia777 clown butthurting lol
2
Why are you clowns repeating the same outdated narratives?
2
@GaGProds LOL who said about 3 days? Idiots lol
2
do not cry, NAFO clown
1
@odxvntr7302 its looks like you butthurting
1
@Ofasia777 lie, clown
1
@Boom.Desjardins We often see questions in the comments why the capture of Artyomovsk (Bakhmut) is being delayed and the city allegedly cannot be captured. 1. It is more convenient to beat the enemy on your own terms. Here, the Armed Forces of Ukraine throw precious reserves into battle and transfer to Artemovsk a lot of units that were previously protected, including the elite and the units understaffed after the defeat in Soledar. In addition to this, almost everyone who can shoot or at least hold a machine gun is being driven under Bakhmut. But the narrower the “bottleneck” (golden bridge) becomes, into which these reinforcements and ammunition must be squeezed, the more equipment and people are lost by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Losses are on delivery, on the road, on unloading, during transfer and transportation directly to Artyomovsk. At the moment, there is not a single road that would not be under the fire control of the “orchestra” or the RF Armed Forces. with the destruction of not only the regular army, but in general any armed units of Ukraine in Artyomovsk, the “orchestra” successfully copes. Once this task is solved, it will be clear which goal will be next. 2. Artyomovsk is not only a city. There are dozens of settlements around, and for each of them there is a fierce squabble with a hundred different Ukrainian units. No matter what anyone says, the flank support of the RF Armed Forces for the "orchestra" fighters operating inside is incredibly important, since the Wagner Group can focus on storming the city. 3. At the moment, the Armed Forces of Ukraine ran into the last three microdistricts of the city in the west - Cheryoma, Novy and the border section between Artyomovsk and Khromov. But the speed with which the "orchestra" is moving through the city blocks, and the very fact that the enemy is actively squeezed out and forced to crowd into a small area by relatively large forces (several battalions), hint that the denouement of this battle (at least for the city itself) is already close. 4. Does the PMC have losses? This question is often asked, but it was rhetorical from the very beginning. In operations of this magnitude, it is simply impossible to do without losses.
1
 @KSmithwick1989 so WHAT? know since what year the Russian military has been destroying militants and American terrorists in Syria?
1
@KSmithwick1989 even the most complete degenerates have already understood that the Russians made a fire bag out of bahmut into which Zelensky constantly fills with his best soldiers, but you sit under your sofa, analyst, think further
1
@KSmithwick1989 None of the official military men called the terms of demilitarization; let me remind you, for example, that Russian troops have been in Syria since 2016 and practically drove the terrorists and the American military out of this country and the situation in it has stabilized; the same generals who are engaged in Ukraine are doing this, no one has ever named and was not going to take Kiev in 3 days, schizos :face-blue-smiling:
1
@KSmithwick1989 the speed of demilitarization is measured not in kilometers and not in days, but in the destroyed equipment and manpower of the enemy, which Wagner does best in the world :face-blue-smiling:
1
@GaGProds the speed of demilitarization is measured not in kilometers and not in days, but in the destroyed equipment and manpower of the enemy, which Wagner does best in the world
1
@GaGProds :face-blue-smiling::face-blue-smiling::face-blue-smiling:it is surprising that there are still clowns who believe in narratives about the time frame for demilitarization and about the capture of Kiev in 3 days. Although none of the official Russian military or officials named any terms for demilitarization, let me remind you that the same Generals Surovikin and Gerasimov have been successfully conducting a military campaign in Syria since 2016 and practically kicked out terrorists supported by the United States
1
@GaGProds "The armor system has passed tests under an expanded program: not only against planned targets simulated by Russian-made ammunition, but also foreign trophy munitions seized by Russia. The armor suite has proven its efficiency," the Group said. Preparations are currently at the final stage for accepting the Arena-M reactive armor suite for service as part of T-72 tanks, it said. "The Russian Defense Ministry is interested in outfitting armored troops with the Arena-M suite as quickly as possible," the Group’s press office said. They report the intention to arm Russian T-72’s and T-80’s with the system in the future ‘as soon as possible’. We’ll see if and how that actually materializes.
1
@GaGProds Remind me how many Ukrainians had tanks at the beginning of the war Or even last August??
1
@GaGProds Book your tickets for the Kubinka tank museum early. September is a good time to visit, should be a number of new exhibits by then... Leopard, Challenger, Bradley, Marder, AMX-10.
1
@GaGProds from these documents, Ukraine’s prewar tank park is almost completely gone. Ukraine went to war with about 800 of its workhorse T-64, but the NATO combat power build notes only 43 now on hand. There are others, of course, that are currently being operated by Ukrainian frontline units, but the build plan indicates that Ukraine has virtually none in reserve to equip this vital attack package, on which all their hopes will depend.
1
@GaGProds One other issue is the Pentagon’s estimate of Russian vehicle losses. It seems that here too they are copy-pasting external estimates. In this case, they appear to be using the “documented” vehicle losses from the Oryx project. Oryx is… interesting. In theory, they are tabulating visually documented equipment losses, which sounds very scientific and hard to dispute. Furthermore, the sheer mass of pictures they have accumulated is something of a verification deterrent - nobody really wants to sort through thousands of pictures and keep score. However, Oryx has been audited and found wanting. There are a variety of issues that cause them to overcount Russian losses, in some cases drastically. These include double counting (multiple pictures of the same vehicle), wrongly identifying Ukrainian vehicles as Russian losses, counting as lost vehicles that have no apparent damage, accepting images that have obviously been photoshopped, and so on. In one particularly egregious case, a picture of a Ukrainian Msta howitzer had its crew photoshopped out and was marked as destroyed Russian artillery piece.
1
@KSmithwick1989 pathetic foreign aid? delusional
1