Comments by "" (@efghggdxlmfn33) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6.  @rogerlevy57  epic b.s go and collect firewoods. "Russia will run out of money sooner." 😂 IMF: GDP Growth Russia 3.2%  | Germany 0.2% World Bank has noted since the war started that Russia passed both Germany and Japan in economic size Russia's budget deficit in 2023 was a mere 1.9% and forecasted to be only 1% in 2024. Meanwhile the US deficit was 6.3%, Germany 2.1%, UK 4.2 %, France 5.5%, Italy 7.4% Russia's National Wealth Fund (NWF) is growing again in 2024 after being reduced by $70B from its peak but again remember much of these are paper losses owing to valuations in Russia's private industries being lower. Russia's income tax rate of a flat 13% has been adjusted to a progressive tax rate that will range from 13% to 22%. Increasing the tax burden for the rich but still being very low compared to much of the world. The increased tax revenue ensures fiscal stability in case of a fall in commodity prices. So what are the Russian problems they cite?. So they argue that since Gazprom lost $7.1B in 2023 that the Russian economy will collapse, ignoring that this is a trivial number in a massive economy or that Gazprom paid over $8B in taxes to the Russian government. Gazprom has about $18B cash in the bank and sells natural gas on the domestic markets for a pittance. Raising gas prices slightly would return Gazprom to profitability and consumers would still pay some of the lowest prices in the world. Russia's fiscal position is vastly superior to any country in the West, having little debt and running small deficits.
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36.  @bobbysox897  Creating an external enemy or "red menace" often serves various political, social, and psychological purposes: Unification and Control: Presenting an external threat can unify a country or group by directing public attention and anger towards a common enemy. This can make it easier for leaders to consolidate their power and control the population, as internal differences and conflicts might be minimized in the face of a perceived larger threat. Justification for Policies: Governments or leaders might use the fear of an external enemy to justify certain domestic or foreign policies that otherwise might be unpopular or controversial. This can include increased military spending, surveillance, and other measures that restrict civil liberties. Distraction from Domestic Issues: By focusing on an external threat, leaders can divert attention away from domestic problems such as economic downturns, corruption, or social unrest. This tactic can reduce public scrutiny of the government’s performance on internal matters. Legitimization of Leadership: In times of perceived threat or conflict, people often rally around their leaders. By emphasizing the danger of an external enemy, leaders can enhance their legitimacy and support, appearing as necessary protectors of the nation or group. Social Cohesion: The idea of a common enemy can foster a sense of solidarity and social cohesion among the populace, reinforcing a collective national or group identity. Economic and Political Gains: On a broader scale, the concept of an external threat can be used to influence international relations and support economic or military objectives, such as gaining access to resources or strategic territories. Overall, the creation of an external enemy is a powerful tool that can be used for multiple purposes, ranging from maintaining power to manipulating public opinion and behavior. However, it also raises ethical questions and can lead to significant consequences, both domestically and internationally.
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1